FAST AND E-FAST
Tilahun Jiru MD
Asst prof of EM & CC
Clinical Case
 GR is a 62 y male who hit his right torso when he
slipped on an icy sidewalk. He denies head trauma,
and can walk without a limp. Two hours later the pain
in his lower chest has increased he comes to the ED.
Clinical Case
 PE: BP 80/50, pulse109, RR 24 , SO2 88%
 There is a minor abrasion to right lateral chest, which is
tender to palpation. Diffuse mild abdominal tenderness.
 Meds: warfarin for irregular heartbeat (AF)
Clinical Case
 2 large IV’s placed, CXR
done. Blood tests sent.
 Bedside ultrasound done.
 CXR revealed lower rib
fractures, no HTX or PTX
In trauma patients, we don’t consider neurogenic, obstructive, or distributive shocks
without first ruling out presence of hemorrhage.
Areas in our body where we can bleed and go into shock include:
-intraperitoneal, retroperitoneal, thorax, pericardial space, pelvis,
external bleeding, femoral triangle/long bones, skull (very rare &
not common in adults; but in pediatrics, especially infants can develop
Shock from skull bleeding)
The retroperitoneal space can accumulate up to 3 liters of blood.
Blood in Morison’s pouch
Clinical Case
 Blood ordered and OR notified.
 He is found to have a liver laceration and 1500 cc of blood
in the peritoneal cavity.
Diagnostic Modalities in Blunt
Abdominal Trauma
 Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage (DPL)
 CAT Scan
 Ultrasound (FAST exam)
DPL
 When we suspect an intra-abdominal collection
 Initially, we try to tap with dry needle. If we take out 10 ml of
fresh blood => Positive (intra-abdominal collection)
 If nothing comes out into the needle (and needle remains dry)
=> we flush with ~1000 ml of NS, take it back with the needle,
and analyze the fluid => if we get >100,000 RBC => Positive
(intra-abdominal collection)
 Usually done around the umbilicus
 Cannot identify specific viscus injuries (it just identifies whether
there is collection or not, without knowing the origin)
 DPL is an old method and it is outdated – replaced by US
Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage
 Advantages
 Very sensitive for
identifying intra-
peritoneal blood
 100,000 RBC/mm3
approx or 10 ml fresh
blood
 Can be done at the
bedside
 Can be done in 10-15
minutes
 Disadvantages
 Overly sensitive, may result in too
high a laparotomy rate
 Invasive
 Difficult in pregnancy, or with
many prior surgeries (because it is
a blind procedure, we can
puncture intra-abdominal organ)
 Can not be repeated (we cannot
puncture again and again)
 Does not help to examine for
retroperitoneal collection
CT-SCAN
 The gold standard for examining for an intra-abdominal
injury.
CT Scan
 Advantages
 Identifies specific
injuries
 Good for hollow viscus
and retroperitoneal
injury
 Best for retroperitoneal
collection
 High sensitivity and
specificity (gold
standard)
 Disadvantages
 Expensive equipment
 30-60 minutes to
complete study
 Only for stable patients
 Not for pregnant patients
(unless a must, where we
have to give priority for
mother’s life)
 We may use contrast,
which can cause AKI.
 There are 2 types of organs in the abdomen – solid and
hollow. The presentations from the injuries of these different
types of organs is different.
 Solid organ injury => blood collection
 Hollow viscus injury => peritonitis; (there would not be an overt
collection; even if there is collection, instead of RBC, WBC and GI
content would be detected). Thus, for such injury, DPL is not helpful.
CT advantageous for such occasion.
FAST
Has 4 components (Dependent areas that should be
scanned):
- Pericardium (sub-xiphoid view) – to look for
pericardial collection. Pericardial collection can
cause obstructive shock. 50-150 ml of acute
bleeding into the pericardium can cause
obstructive shock. We visualize the pericardium
under the xiphoid.
- Right upper quadrant (hepato-renal view) – to
look for collection in Morison’s pouch.
- Left upper quadrant (spleno-renal view) –
- Pelvis
Focused Abdominal
Sonography in Trauma
 The most common intra-abdominal organ to be injured by
blunt trauma is the spleen.
 By penetrating trauma => liver
FAST
 Advantages
 Can be performed in 5
minutes at the bedside
(the equipment is very
portable)
 Non-invasive (no
radiation; no contrast)
 Repeat exams
 Sensitivity and
specificity for free fluid
almost equal to DPL and
CT
 Disadvantages
 Operator dependent
 May not identify specific injury (we cannot tell
which organ is injured)
 Poor for hollow viscus or retroperitoneal injury (air
is an enemy of US wave)
 Poor for diaphragmatic, duodenal, and pancreatic
injuries (CT good for these, but still not the best. For
diaphragmatic injury the best diagnostic modality is
laparoscopy. For pancreas => CT still best)
 Obesity, subcutaneous air (from a concomitant chest
injury) may interfere with exam
 We cannot differentiate whether the collection is
blood or another type of fluid (e.g., urine)
FAST Principles
 Detects free intraperitoneal
fluid
 Blood/fluid pools in
dependent areas
 Pelvis
 Most dependent
 Hepatorenal fossa
 Most dependent area in
supramesocolic region
FAST- principles
 Intraperitoneal fluid may be
 Blood
 Preexisting ascites
 Urine
 Intestinal contents
FAST – limitations
 US relatively insensitive for detecting traumatic abdominal
organ injury
 We cannot estimate the volume of fluid collected
 Fluid may pool at variable rates
 Minimum volume for US detection (250 ml)
 Multiple views at multiple sites
 Serial exams: repeat exam if there is a change in clinical
picture
 If our initial scan is normal, it doesn’t rule out collection.
Because, blood collection is an ongoing process; it doesn’t
collect at one time.
 Operator dependent
Protocol:
+ Pericardial fluid OR
Stable CT
+IP fluid
unstable OR
 There are CT indications for laparotomy. If patient has stable VS
with positive FAST, we have to identify and grade the injury with
CT. There are gradings of hepatic, renal, splenic… injuries.
FAST
Perform during
 Resuscitation (in ATLS, we
can do FAST at C
(circulation) or at E
(exposure)).
 Physical exam
 Stabilization
Equipment
Curved array
 Various “footprints”
 Small footprint for thorax
 Large for abdomen
 Variable frequencies
 5.0 MHz: thin, child
 3.5 MHz: versatile
 2.0 MHz: cardiac, large pts
 There are different types of probes:
 Abdominal/curved probe – used to visualize
for deep collection. The resolution is poor.
High-depth-low-resolution.
 Vascular/straight probe – low-depth, high-
resolution
Time to Complete Scan
 Each view: 30-60 seconds
 Number of views dependent on clinical question and
findings on initial views
 Total exam time usually < 3-5 minutes
Focused Abdominal Sonography for
Trauma (FAST)
 Consists of 4 views
 Subxiphoid
 Right Upper Quadrant
 Left Upper Quadrant
 Pouch of Douglas
FAST
 Increased sensitivity with
increased number of views
 Will identify pleural effusions
 Reliably detects as little as
50-100cc in the thorax (CXR
– 200 to 250 ml). US is more
sensitive in detecting both
pneumo- & hemo-thorax than
X-ray.
Clinical experience with FAST
 Intraperitoneal fluid
 Sensitivity 82-98%, specificity 88-100%
 Increased sensitivity with
 Increasing number of views
 Trendelenberg
 Serial examinations
 Can detect as little as 250cc of free fluid
RUQ
 Probe at right thoraco-
abdominal junction
 Liver : used as a large acoustic
window (bc liver is filled with
parenchyma and blood, which
are good in transmitting US
wave)
 Probe marker/indicator should
be pointing upward (cephalad)
or to the right side.
 Rib interference? (avoid)
 Rotate 30° counterclockwise
Scan Plane
 Same image if probe
positioned
 Anterior
 Mid axillary
 Posterior
RUQ
 Image on screen:
 Liver cephalad
 Kidney inferiorly (hyper-
echoic medulla + hypo-
echoic cortex + renal sinus
+ capsule)
 Morison’s Pouch*: space
between Glisson’s capsule
and Gerota’s fascia
*
*
*
*
Normal RUQ
 Image kidney
 Longitudinally
 Transversely
 Two toned structure
 Cortex/medulla
 Renal sinus
Appearance of blood
 Fresh blood
 Anechoic (black)
 Coagulating blood
 First hypoechoic
 Later hyperechoic
Normal
Morison’s Pouch
Free fluid in
Morison’s
Pouch
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
Always, before ruling out collection, we have to check the inferior
border of the kidney, because that’s the most dependent area.
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
All Fluid is not Blood
 Ascites
 Ruptured Ovarian Cyst
 Lavage fluid
 Urine from ruptured bladder
Pitfalls
 RUQ
 Not attempting multiple probe placements
 Not placing the probe cephalad enough to use the
acoustic window of the liver
 Scanning too soon before enough blood has accumulated
 Not repeating the scan
LUQ
 Probe at left posterior axillary
line
 Probe indicator should be
place upward
 Near ribs 9 and 10
 Angle probe obliquely (avoid
ribs)
 More posteriorly than for
RUQ
LUQ Scan Plane
 More difficult
 Acoustic window
(spleen) is smaller than
liver
 Mild inspiration will
optimize image
 Bowel interference is
common
LUQ Scan
spleen
kidney
*Splenorenal fossa – a potential space
*
*
*
*
Normal
Spleno-renal
view
Free fluid
around spleen
More of sub-diaphragmatic than spleno-renal
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
To Evaluate the Thorax (E-
FAST)
 Move probe
 cephalad
 longitudinal
 Image
Liver
Diaphragm
Pleural space
Hemothorax
liver
diaphragm
fluid
Spine should not extend beyond the diaphragm.
bc above diaphragm, normally there is
air/lungs. If fluid collection in thorax => US
wave can pass => spine can be seen (Spine
Sign)
Small Pleural Effusion
Large Pleural Effusion
Lung Scanning for Pneumothorax
“
“Bat” Sign
Bat” Sign Comet tails
Comet tails
Air accumulates anteriorly in the pleura. Therefore we use the vascular/
straight probe.
We place the probe longitudinally.
Normal findings:
•Pleural movement (lung sliding) – movement of the pleural line
•Comet tails – short vertical lines arising from pleura. When patient
breaths, these lines move.
•M-mode tracing – Sea-shore appearance
Pleural
line
Normal Lung
Comet tails
Pneumothorax
No comet tails. Plus there would be no movement.
M-mode tracing
04/25/25
fast and ED radiography
52
There is a key/button for M-mode on the machine. After placing the
probe, when we touch the mode, we’ll find the above tracing.
In the normal tracing, the horizontal lines do not continue up to below,
Whereas in pneumothorax M-mode tracing, the lines continue downward.
Normal - Sea-shore Pneumothorax – Barcode or stratosphere
sign
Pelvic View
 Probe should be placed in
the suprapubic position
 Either can be transverse or
longitudinal
 Helpful to image before
placement of a Foley
catheter
Pelvis (Long View)
Full bladder is the acoustic window
Pelvis: Transverse
Normal
Transverse
pelvic
Fluid in pelvis
Blood in the Pelvis
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
Penetrating Cardiac Trauma
 Pericardial effusion
 May develop suddenly or surreptitiously
 May exist before clinical signs develop
 Salvage rates better if detected before hypotension
develops
Clinical Case
 QD is 37 year old male brought in by EMS for ingesting
entire bottle of unidentified red and white pills. In the
ambulance bay he pulls out a knife and stabs himself in the
left nipple.
Clinical Case
 Initial BP 116/72, pulse 109 RR 24. IV’s placed.
 No JVD, Clear breath sounds, non tender abdomen
 As CXR is about to be done, pulse increases to 134.
 Bedside ultrasound is done while cartridge is developed.
Clinical Case
Clinical Case
 Patient is taken to the OR
 Penetrating cardiac wound is repaired
Subcostal View
Most practical in
trauma setting
Away from airway
and neck/chest
procedures
Also called Sub-
Xyphoid view
Subcostal View
Subcostal View
We expect fluid bn epicardium (visceral pericardium) and
parietal pericardium.
A single normal US finding doesn’t rule out injury. We’ve to do it
serially.
normal
Pericardial Fluid
fluid
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS
Avoid Pitfalls
 Normal echo does not definitively rule out major
pericardial injury
 Repeat echo with  clinical picture
 Epicardial fat pad may easily be misinterpreted as “clot”
 Hemothorax may be confused with pericardial effusion
 The most important preoperative objective in
the management of the patient with trauma is to
ascertain whether or not laparotomy is needed,
and not the diagnosis of a specific organ injury”

More Related Content

PPT
29 us trauma
PPT
Emergency Ultrasound In Trauma
PPT
Fast faroe islands 2019 sudhir
PPTX
Imaging in abdominal trauma
PPTX
Imaging of blunt abdominal trauma.pptx
PPTX
Abdominal Trauma and FAST scan (Dr. Derhim Afaqeeh , Yemen )
PPTX
Abdominal trauma
29 us trauma
Emergency Ultrasound In Trauma
Fast faroe islands 2019 sudhir
Imaging in abdominal trauma
Imaging of blunt abdominal trauma.pptx
Abdominal Trauma and FAST scan (Dr. Derhim Afaqeeh , Yemen )
Abdominal trauma

Similar to 2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS (20)

PPTX
Fast scan presentation.pptx what is fast scan?
PPTX
Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) in 2017
PPT
Blunt trauma abdomen
PDF
Imaging of Abdominal Trauma
PPTX
6- Abdominal Trauma and FAST Scan.pptx
PPT
Abdominal trauma
PPTX
Extended focus assessment with sonography for trauma
PDF
fast-sherifali.pdf
PPTX
2020 FAST...........................pptx
PPTX
FAST focused assessment with sonography for trauma
PPT
abdominal trauma.ppt
PPTX
Blunt abdominal trauma.ppt0021.pptx
PPTX
ppt Abd trauma Present.pptx
PPTX
Abdominal trauma : an overview
PPTX
Abdominal ultrasound for midwifery students .pptx
PDF
Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma
PPTX
Abdominal Injury.pptx
Fast scan presentation.pptx what is fast scan?
Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) in 2017
Blunt trauma abdomen
Imaging of Abdominal Trauma
6- Abdominal Trauma and FAST Scan.pptx
Abdominal trauma
Extended focus assessment with sonography for trauma
fast-sherifali.pdf
2020 FAST...........................pptx
FAST focused assessment with sonography for trauma
abdominal trauma.ppt
Blunt abdominal trauma.ppt0021.pptx
ppt Abd trauma Present.pptx
Abdominal trauma : an overview
Abdominal ultrasound for midwifery students .pptx
Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma
Abdominal Injury.pptx
Ad

More from HashimHussein6 (7)

PPTX
10. Adult Cardiac Arrest Algorithms (ACLS).pptx
PPT
19. Mechanical Ventilation.ppt in icu training
PPT
9. Chest Pain and AMI.ppt main night mare
PPTX
4. Case Discussion on Emergency Radiology.pptx
PPT
5. Shock (Edited) (2).ppt general concept
PPTX
7. Case Scenario - Types of Shock.pptx 4
PPT
1. Approach to Trauma (3).ppt for c1 medical students
10. Adult Cardiac Arrest Algorithms (ACLS).pptx
19. Mechanical Ventilation.ppt in icu training
9. Chest Pain and AMI.ppt main night mare
4. Case Discussion on Emergency Radiology.pptx
5. Shock (Edited) (2).ppt general concept
7. Case Scenario - Types of Shock.pptx 4
1. Approach to Trauma (3).ppt for c1 medical students
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PPTX
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
PDF
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PDF
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
DOC
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PDF
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
PPTX
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
PDF
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
advance database management system book.pdf
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf

2. FAST (Edited).ppt introductory lecture on FOCUS

  • 1. FAST AND E-FAST Tilahun Jiru MD Asst prof of EM & CC
  • 2. Clinical Case  GR is a 62 y male who hit his right torso when he slipped on an icy sidewalk. He denies head trauma, and can walk without a limp. Two hours later the pain in his lower chest has increased he comes to the ED.
  • 3. Clinical Case  PE: BP 80/50, pulse109, RR 24 , SO2 88%  There is a minor abrasion to right lateral chest, which is tender to palpation. Diffuse mild abdominal tenderness.  Meds: warfarin for irregular heartbeat (AF)
  • 4. Clinical Case  2 large IV’s placed, CXR done. Blood tests sent.  Bedside ultrasound done.  CXR revealed lower rib fractures, no HTX or PTX In trauma patients, we don’t consider neurogenic, obstructive, or distributive shocks without first ruling out presence of hemorrhage. Areas in our body where we can bleed and go into shock include: -intraperitoneal, retroperitoneal, thorax, pericardial space, pelvis, external bleeding, femoral triangle/long bones, skull (very rare & not common in adults; but in pediatrics, especially infants can develop Shock from skull bleeding) The retroperitoneal space can accumulate up to 3 liters of blood. Blood in Morison’s pouch
  • 5. Clinical Case  Blood ordered and OR notified.  He is found to have a liver laceration and 1500 cc of blood in the peritoneal cavity.
  • 6. Diagnostic Modalities in Blunt Abdominal Trauma  Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage (DPL)  CAT Scan  Ultrasound (FAST exam)
  • 7. DPL  When we suspect an intra-abdominal collection  Initially, we try to tap with dry needle. If we take out 10 ml of fresh blood => Positive (intra-abdominal collection)  If nothing comes out into the needle (and needle remains dry) => we flush with ~1000 ml of NS, take it back with the needle, and analyze the fluid => if we get >100,000 RBC => Positive (intra-abdominal collection)  Usually done around the umbilicus  Cannot identify specific viscus injuries (it just identifies whether there is collection or not, without knowing the origin)  DPL is an old method and it is outdated – replaced by US
  • 8. Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage  Advantages  Very sensitive for identifying intra- peritoneal blood  100,000 RBC/mm3 approx or 10 ml fresh blood  Can be done at the bedside  Can be done in 10-15 minutes  Disadvantages  Overly sensitive, may result in too high a laparotomy rate  Invasive  Difficult in pregnancy, or with many prior surgeries (because it is a blind procedure, we can puncture intra-abdominal organ)  Can not be repeated (we cannot puncture again and again)  Does not help to examine for retroperitoneal collection
  • 9. CT-SCAN  The gold standard for examining for an intra-abdominal injury.
  • 10. CT Scan  Advantages  Identifies specific injuries  Good for hollow viscus and retroperitoneal injury  Best for retroperitoneal collection  High sensitivity and specificity (gold standard)  Disadvantages  Expensive equipment  30-60 minutes to complete study  Only for stable patients  Not for pregnant patients (unless a must, where we have to give priority for mother’s life)  We may use contrast, which can cause AKI.
  • 11.  There are 2 types of organs in the abdomen – solid and hollow. The presentations from the injuries of these different types of organs is different.  Solid organ injury => blood collection  Hollow viscus injury => peritonitis; (there would not be an overt collection; even if there is collection, instead of RBC, WBC and GI content would be detected). Thus, for such injury, DPL is not helpful. CT advantageous for such occasion.
  • 12. FAST Has 4 components (Dependent areas that should be scanned): - Pericardium (sub-xiphoid view) – to look for pericardial collection. Pericardial collection can cause obstructive shock. 50-150 ml of acute bleeding into the pericardium can cause obstructive shock. We visualize the pericardium under the xiphoid. - Right upper quadrant (hepato-renal view) – to look for collection in Morison’s pouch. - Left upper quadrant (spleno-renal view) – - Pelvis Focused Abdominal Sonography in Trauma
  • 13.  The most common intra-abdominal organ to be injured by blunt trauma is the spleen.  By penetrating trauma => liver
  • 14. FAST  Advantages  Can be performed in 5 minutes at the bedside (the equipment is very portable)  Non-invasive (no radiation; no contrast)  Repeat exams  Sensitivity and specificity for free fluid almost equal to DPL and CT  Disadvantages  Operator dependent  May not identify specific injury (we cannot tell which organ is injured)  Poor for hollow viscus or retroperitoneal injury (air is an enemy of US wave)  Poor for diaphragmatic, duodenal, and pancreatic injuries (CT good for these, but still not the best. For diaphragmatic injury the best diagnostic modality is laparoscopy. For pancreas => CT still best)  Obesity, subcutaneous air (from a concomitant chest injury) may interfere with exam  We cannot differentiate whether the collection is blood or another type of fluid (e.g., urine)
  • 15. FAST Principles  Detects free intraperitoneal fluid  Blood/fluid pools in dependent areas  Pelvis  Most dependent  Hepatorenal fossa  Most dependent area in supramesocolic region
  • 16. FAST- principles  Intraperitoneal fluid may be  Blood  Preexisting ascites  Urine  Intestinal contents
  • 17. FAST – limitations  US relatively insensitive for detecting traumatic abdominal organ injury  We cannot estimate the volume of fluid collected  Fluid may pool at variable rates  Minimum volume for US detection (250 ml)  Multiple views at multiple sites  Serial exams: repeat exam if there is a change in clinical picture  If our initial scan is normal, it doesn’t rule out collection. Because, blood collection is an ongoing process; it doesn’t collect at one time.  Operator dependent
  • 18. Protocol: + Pericardial fluid OR Stable CT +IP fluid unstable OR  There are CT indications for laparotomy. If patient has stable VS with positive FAST, we have to identify and grade the injury with CT. There are gradings of hepatic, renal, splenic… injuries.
  • 19. FAST Perform during  Resuscitation (in ATLS, we can do FAST at C (circulation) or at E (exposure)).  Physical exam  Stabilization
  • 20. Equipment Curved array  Various “footprints”  Small footprint for thorax  Large for abdomen  Variable frequencies  5.0 MHz: thin, child  3.5 MHz: versatile  2.0 MHz: cardiac, large pts  There are different types of probes:  Abdominal/curved probe – used to visualize for deep collection. The resolution is poor. High-depth-low-resolution.  Vascular/straight probe – low-depth, high- resolution
  • 21. Time to Complete Scan  Each view: 30-60 seconds  Number of views dependent on clinical question and findings on initial views  Total exam time usually < 3-5 minutes
  • 22. Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma (FAST)  Consists of 4 views  Subxiphoid  Right Upper Quadrant  Left Upper Quadrant  Pouch of Douglas
  • 23. FAST  Increased sensitivity with increased number of views  Will identify pleural effusions  Reliably detects as little as 50-100cc in the thorax (CXR – 200 to 250 ml). US is more sensitive in detecting both pneumo- & hemo-thorax than X-ray.
  • 24. Clinical experience with FAST  Intraperitoneal fluid  Sensitivity 82-98%, specificity 88-100%  Increased sensitivity with  Increasing number of views  Trendelenberg  Serial examinations  Can detect as little as 250cc of free fluid
  • 25. RUQ  Probe at right thoraco- abdominal junction  Liver : used as a large acoustic window (bc liver is filled with parenchyma and blood, which are good in transmitting US wave)  Probe marker/indicator should be pointing upward (cephalad) or to the right side.  Rib interference? (avoid)  Rotate 30° counterclockwise
  • 26. Scan Plane  Same image if probe positioned  Anterior  Mid axillary  Posterior
  • 27. RUQ  Image on screen:  Liver cephalad  Kidney inferiorly (hyper- echoic medulla + hypo- echoic cortex + renal sinus + capsule)  Morison’s Pouch*: space between Glisson’s capsule and Gerota’s fascia * * * *
  • 28. Normal RUQ  Image kidney  Longitudinally  Transversely  Two toned structure  Cortex/medulla  Renal sinus
  • 29. Appearance of blood  Fresh blood  Anechoic (black)  Coagulating blood  First hypoechoic  Later hyperechoic
  • 30. Normal Morison’s Pouch Free fluid in Morison’s Pouch
  • 32. Always, before ruling out collection, we have to check the inferior border of the kidney, because that’s the most dependent area.
  • 36. All Fluid is not Blood  Ascites  Ruptured Ovarian Cyst  Lavage fluid  Urine from ruptured bladder
  • 37. Pitfalls  RUQ  Not attempting multiple probe placements  Not placing the probe cephalad enough to use the acoustic window of the liver  Scanning too soon before enough blood has accumulated  Not repeating the scan
  • 38. LUQ  Probe at left posterior axillary line  Probe indicator should be place upward  Near ribs 9 and 10  Angle probe obliquely (avoid ribs)  More posteriorly than for RUQ
  • 39. LUQ Scan Plane  More difficult  Acoustic window (spleen) is smaller than liver  Mild inspiration will optimize image  Bowel interference is common
  • 40. LUQ Scan spleen kidney *Splenorenal fossa – a potential space * * * *
  • 42. More of sub-diaphragmatic than spleno-renal
  • 46. To Evaluate the Thorax (E- FAST)  Move probe  cephalad  longitudinal  Image Liver Diaphragm Pleural space
  • 47. Hemothorax liver diaphragm fluid Spine should not extend beyond the diaphragm. bc above diaphragm, normally there is air/lungs. If fluid collection in thorax => US wave can pass => spine can be seen (Spine Sign)
  • 48. Small Pleural Effusion Large Pleural Effusion
  • 49. Lung Scanning for Pneumothorax “ “Bat” Sign Bat” Sign Comet tails Comet tails Air accumulates anteriorly in the pleura. Therefore we use the vascular/ straight probe. We place the probe longitudinally. Normal findings: •Pleural movement (lung sliding) – movement of the pleural line •Comet tails – short vertical lines arising from pleura. When patient breaths, these lines move. •M-mode tracing – Sea-shore appearance Pleural line
  • 51. Pneumothorax No comet tails. Plus there would be no movement.
  • 52. M-mode tracing 04/25/25 fast and ED radiography 52 There is a key/button for M-mode on the machine. After placing the probe, when we touch the mode, we’ll find the above tracing. In the normal tracing, the horizontal lines do not continue up to below, Whereas in pneumothorax M-mode tracing, the lines continue downward. Normal - Sea-shore Pneumothorax – Barcode or stratosphere sign
  • 53. Pelvic View  Probe should be placed in the suprapubic position  Either can be transverse or longitudinal  Helpful to image before placement of a Foley catheter
  • 54. Pelvis (Long View) Full bladder is the acoustic window
  • 57. Blood in the Pelvis
  • 60. Penetrating Cardiac Trauma  Pericardial effusion  May develop suddenly or surreptitiously  May exist before clinical signs develop  Salvage rates better if detected before hypotension develops
  • 61. Clinical Case  QD is 37 year old male brought in by EMS for ingesting entire bottle of unidentified red and white pills. In the ambulance bay he pulls out a knife and stabs himself in the left nipple.
  • 62. Clinical Case  Initial BP 116/72, pulse 109 RR 24. IV’s placed.  No JVD, Clear breath sounds, non tender abdomen  As CXR is about to be done, pulse increases to 134.  Bedside ultrasound is done while cartridge is developed.
  • 64. Clinical Case  Patient is taken to the OR  Penetrating cardiac wound is repaired
  • 65. Subcostal View Most practical in trauma setting Away from airway and neck/chest procedures Also called Sub- Xyphoid view
  • 67. Subcostal View We expect fluid bn epicardium (visceral pericardium) and parietal pericardium. A single normal US finding doesn’t rule out injury. We’ve to do it serially. normal
  • 74. Avoid Pitfalls  Normal echo does not definitively rule out major pericardial injury  Repeat echo with  clinical picture  Epicardial fat pad may easily be misinterpreted as “clot”  Hemothorax may be confused with pericardial effusion
  • 75.  The most important preoperative objective in the management of the patient with trauma is to ascertain whether or not laparotomy is needed, and not the diagnosis of a specific organ injury”

Editor's Notes

  • #49: Bat sign represents rib – pleura – rib. Looking for 2 things….lung sliding and comet tails. Comet tails are reverberation artifact when ultrasound waves bounce between 2 reflective surfaces (like the visceral and parietal pleura)
  • #50: Chest wall, point out pleura, sliding and comet tails…