SlideShare a Scribd company logo
01-02-2012




               Reliability                                      Reliability Function
• A relative frequency definition of reliability can   • Let us put some N items under life test under the
  be stated as follows:                                  same environmental conditions and observe the
  If a large number of independent systems/              number of failures at a predetermined interval of
  subsystems/components are operated at the same
       y            p            p                       time, regularly. Obviously the number of failures
  time, the R(t) can be estimated to be the ratio of     would go on i
                                                               ld         increasing until all th N it
                                                                                 i      til ll the  items putt
  systems/subsystems/ components still running           under test have failed. The test is terminated only
  over time t         and the initial number of          when all the items have failed. Let us consider that
  systems/subsystems/components put to operation.        we are considering catastrophic failures only. Let us
                                                         assume that the number of failures over a time t are:
                                                         nf (t). Naturally, the survivals shall be:
  Systems/subsystems/components can be called, in        ns(t) = N- nf (t).
  general, as items.
                                                   1                                                       2




          Reliability Function                                   Reliability Function
• From the definition of probability, we can            • The item unreliability likewise can be
  define reliability as:                                  defined as:


• Obviously this definition requires that the           • In fact Q(t) shall also be the cumulative
  test is conducted for a large value of N                distribution (cdf) or F(t) if the random
  under identical conditions of tests and the             variable, t , is taken as time-to-failure for
  tests are conducted independently.                      the observation, in this test.
                                                   3                                                       4




                                                                                                                   1
01-02-2012




    Reliability and Unreliability                            Reliability Function
• Cumulative distribution function can also be
  defined as:                                        • The cumulative distribution function
                                                       increases from 0 to 1 as the random
                                                       variable, t increases from zero to its highest
                                                               ,                                g
                                                       value towards infinity. Since at t = 0, the
                                                       item was operating, Q(t)=F(t)=0, but as
• Reliability (Survival Function) is given by:         t, F(t) 1. Also, at t = 0, R(t)= 1 and
                                                       R(t) 0 as t. We also know that the
Density Function would be defined by:                  derivative of cdf of a continuous rv provides
                                                       probability density function or f(t).
                                                 5                                                      6




        Reliability Function                                 Reliability Function
                                                     • By dividing both sides of equation (1), we can
                                                       define what is known as hazard rate, viz.,



                                                     • Realizing that,
                                                     we obtain an important relationship:


                                                 7                                                      8




                                                                                                                2
01-02-2012




                                                                     Hazard Rate
         Reliability Function
                                                            In other words, the hazard rate is the
• It is important to highlight at this stage the
  difference between rate of failing and hazard            conditional     probability    of    an
  rate. At two different points of time, say at t1 and
                          p            , y                 instantaneous failure given that the
                                                                           f       g
  t2, we can have the same rate of failing but as the      component is surviving upto time t,
  number of survivals would go on reducing the
  hazard rate would not remain the same even if the
                                                           divided by the length of the short time
  rate of failing is the same. Hazard rate is a better     interval involved.
  indicator of how hazardous a situation is at a given
  point of time.
                                                     9                                                       10




         Reliability Function                                     Reliability Function
• It is obvious from the foregoing expressions that
                                                         • Now reverting to an expression derived earlier, we
  f(t) is the rate of failing normalized to the
                                                           have:
  original population put to test whereas h(t) is the
  rate of failing normalized to the number of
  survivals. The difference forms of f(t) and h(t)       • We can solve this first order differential equation
  that can be used to obtain them from the histogram       by separable variable technique with initial
  of life-test data, is given by:                          condition that at t = 0, R(0) = 1. We then obtain a
                                                           very important relationship in reliability studies:


                                                    11                                                       12




                                                                                                                     3
01-02-2012




             Reliability Function                                                                 Characterizations
        Reliability Characteristics of a Unit
                                                                                          A probability distribution is completely
                                                                                          characterized by each of the following
                                                                                          entities:
                                 Hazard Rate                                            • Density function (f(t))
f(t), h(t)                        h(t)=f(t)/R(t)                           f(t1)        • Cumulative distribution function (F(t))
                                                                                        • Reliability (R(t))
                                                                                        • Hazard rate (h(t))
                                                               R(t1) Area
             Q(t1) or
             F(t1) Area
                                                                                        In other words: if one of these entities is known, we
                                     t1
                                                                                           can compute the other entities from it.
                                                                                   13                                                           14
                          Fig. 3.1: Reliability Characteristic of a Unit




       Case I (Density Function is known)                                                 Case II (Distribution Function is known)
                              t                                                                    f (t )  F ' (t )
             F (t )   f ( x )dx
                             0                                                                    R(t )  1  F ( t )
                            
             R(t )   f ( x )dx                                                                                   F ' (t )
                             t                                                                    h( t ) 
                            f (t )                                                                              1  F (t )
             h(t ) 
                            R( t )                                                 15                                                           16




                                                                                                                                                        4
01-02-2012




             Case III (Reliability is known)                                    Reliability and MTTF
                                                                                                  t
                                                                                                   h(u)du
                     f ( t )   R' ( t )                                           R( t )  e    0
                                                                                                      t

                    F ( t )  1  R( t )                                Th function
                                                                         The f   i        (t ) 
                                                                        cumulative hazard rate.
                                                                                                       h( u)du
                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                                  is called the
                                                                                                                  i    ll d h

                                       R' ( t )                        The expected lifetime is often called Mean Time To
                   h(t )                                               Failure (MTTF).
                                       R( t )                             It is dangerous to make decisions based on MTTF
                                                                        only; never cross the river based on average depth.
                                                                        Consider the variance as well!
                                                               17                                                                 18




                                  MTTF                                              Reliability Expressions
The mean-time-to-failure in case of a continuous                         •   Using the expression:
random variable such as time- to- failure, t ,is given                   •   We can obtain the reliability of a unit, which
by:                                                                          follows a given failure distribution or has a
                            t                                          i    h     d      F
                                                                             given hazard rate. For example:l
                                
MTTF 
            tf ( t )dt 
                            
                             
                                
                                 
                                             
                              du f ( t )dt 
                                                           
                                                  f (t )dtdu  R(u)du    1. For h(t) = , we have :
         0                  00               0u             0          2. For linearly increasing hazard rate, h(t) =
This applies equally well to component MTTF,                                 a+bt , we have:
subsystem MTTF or even to system MTTF. We
must, however, take appropriate reliability of the
                                                19                                                                                20
entity.




                                                                                                                                          5
01-02-2012




            Reliability Expressions                                        Reliability Expressions
3. If the hazard rate is increasing non-linearly, i.e.,         • Therefore, if we know the variation of
   the failure distribution is Weibull or so, with                hazard rate with time,we can obtain the
   hazard rate given by:
                g        y                                        expression for component reliability using
                                                                  the very versatile general expression:

   The reliability expression would be given by:


                                                                      Where T is the mission time.
                                                           21                                                          22




                   Phases of Life                                        Typical Bathtub Curve
• There are three phases of life of any unit. These are:         Bathtub curve describes the variation of hazard rate with
                                                                 time, which is generally taken as life of a unit.
• Early Life or Infancy Period
• Useful Life or Prime of Life
• W
  Wearout Phase or P i d
          t Ph       Period

• Each phase has a particular type of failure dominant
  and has respectively over these three phases of life
  either decreasing, constant or increasing hazard rate
  characteristic. These failures result in an overall
  characteristic over the life time, which apparently looks
  like a bath tub . Hence the name.
                                                           23                                                          24




                                                                                                                               6
01-02-2012




                      Early Life                                                    Useful Life
• Early life has predominantly Quality failures, which         • During this period, the hazard rate is very often small
  show up in early life of a unit and can be traced mainly       and approximately constant. It is during this period
  to the manufacturer’s carelessness and can be                  that a unit is put to effective use and usefully employed
  attributed to defective designs, use of substandard            during the entire life time. During this period, early or
  material, poor workmanship or poor quality control.            quality failures as well as wear out failures are
  These failures result in a very high hazard rate in the        negligible. O l sudden or catastrophic f il
                                                                     li ibl Only       dd                 hi failures can
  beginning and keeps decreasing as the time passes.             occur, which are primarily caused by sudden and step
  Early failures can be eliminated through the use of            increase in the stress level beyond the design strength.
  debugging process which consists of operating a unit           These failures occur randomly and unexpectedly.
  under conditions of use for a period of time                   However their frequency over a long period of time is
  corresponding to the preponderance of early failures.          constant. One cannot eliminate these failures but their
  The length of debugging period is decided by observing         probability can be reduced by improving reliability at
  the failure distribution and by following a specific           the design stage.
  debugging procedure. This is also known as burn in
  period.                                                25                                                              26




                   Wearout Life                                            Other Hazard Models
• As the unit reaches the end of its life, parts begin to       • Next slide provides a list of some of the distributions
  wear out and the hazard rate of the unit begins to rise         that are extensively used in reliability studies. But one
  rapidly. Early or quality failures are very rare during         must lose sight of the practicability and not fit a
  this period and stress related failures occur with the          complicated model where it is not actually necessary.
  same frequency as they occur in other phases of life.
  The failures that occur d i
  Th f il        h          during this period are aptly
                                     hi      i d         l
  called as gradual or wearout failures and are dominant
  in old age or towards the end of the life time. These
  failures keep increasing slowly over the life as the
  deterioration increases with age and the age at which
  these become predominant depends on the
  environment, a unit is operated. It is advisable that the
  replacement of a unit should be done about the point tw
  in time. Otherwise the sudden failure may be costly in
                                                          27                                                             28
  consequences.




                                                                                                                                 7
01-02-2012




                                                                          Constant Hazard Rate
                                                                 The useful life period of bath tub curve during which
                                                                 catastrophic failures are dominant is often characterized
                                                                 by constant hazard rate thus is best modeled by the
                                                                 exponential failure distribution. The failure process is
                                                                 memoryless and does not recognize the time already
                                                                 elapsed already during the life span.




                                                         29                                                            30




Decreasing /Increasing Hazard rates                           Decreasing /Increasing Hazard rates
  • Decreasing or increasing hazard rates can be modeled       Decreasing/increasing hazard rates can also be modeled using
    by Weibull distribution by suitably choosing the value     Gamma distribution. When  < 1, decreasing hazard rates
    of parameter . When  < 1, we get reliability function    would be described whereas for  > 1, we can obtain
    corresponding to decreasing Hazard rate. However, if      increasing hazard rates with the help of Gamma distribution.
    > 1, we get reliability function corresponding to
       ,    g             y                p     g
    increasing Hazard rate.




                                                         31                                                            32




                                                                                                                               8
01-02-2012




Thanks

         33




                      9

More Related Content

PPT
Perils of an Old Metric: MTBF
DOCX
Overview of verilog
PPTX
DOCX
レポート深層学習前編
PPS
Sem1 plt xp_03
PPS
Sem1 plt xp_02
PDF
ThinkBayes: Chapter 9 two_dimensions
PDF
Impact of censored data on reliability analysis
Perils of an Old Metric: MTBF
Overview of verilog
レポート深層学習前編
Sem1 plt xp_03
Sem1 plt xp_02
ThinkBayes: Chapter 9 two_dimensions
Impact of censored data on reliability analysis

Similar to 2. reliability function (20)

PPTX
BASIC RELIABILITY MATHEMATICS.pptx
PDF
Introduction of Queue Theory. The Basics
PPT
Intro to ecm models and cointegration.ppt
PDF
IJCER (www.ijceronline.com) International Journal of computational Engineerin...
PPT
FE3.ppt
PPTX
ders 3.3 Unit root testing section 3 .pptx
PDF
Cointegration and Long-Horizon Forecasting
PDF
CDS and Loss function: CDO Tranches
PPTX
Reliability.pptx related to quality related
PPT
StewartCalcET7e_05_04.ppt
PDF
A05220108
PDF
Fundamentals of reliability engineering and applications part3of3
PPTX
Topic 2b .pptx
PDF
Effecient reliability demostration tests
DOCX
Measures of Similaritv and Dissimilaritv 65the comparison .docx
PPT
Autocorrelation Function Nature and Characterstics ppt 2.ppt
PDF
Impact of Derivative Trading on the volatility of the underlying asset
DOCX
Common Mistakes with MTBF
PDF
International Journal of Engineering Inventions (IJEI),
PDF
A generic method for modeling accelerated life testing data
BASIC RELIABILITY MATHEMATICS.pptx
Introduction of Queue Theory. The Basics
Intro to ecm models and cointegration.ppt
IJCER (www.ijceronline.com) International Journal of computational Engineerin...
FE3.ppt
ders 3.3 Unit root testing section 3 .pptx
Cointegration and Long-Horizon Forecasting
CDS and Loss function: CDO Tranches
Reliability.pptx related to quality related
StewartCalcET7e_05_04.ppt
A05220108
Fundamentals of reliability engineering and applications part3of3
Topic 2b .pptx
Effecient reliability demostration tests
Measures of Similaritv and Dissimilaritv 65the comparison .docx
Autocorrelation Function Nature and Characterstics ppt 2.ppt
Impact of Derivative Trading on the volatility of the underlying asset
Common Mistakes with MTBF
International Journal of Engineering Inventions (IJEI),
A generic method for modeling accelerated life testing data
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
PPTX
20250228 LYD VKU AI Blended-Learning.pptx
PDF
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
PDF
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
PDF
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
PDF
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
PDF
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
PDF
The Rise and Fall of 3GPP – Time for a Sabbatical?
PDF
gpt5_lecture_notes_comprehensive_20250812015547.pdf
PDF
Accuracy of neural networks in brain wave diagnosis of schizophrenia
PPTX
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
PDF
MIND Revenue Release Quarter 2 2025 Press Release
PPTX
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
PDF
Optimiser vos workloads AI/ML sur Amazon EC2 et AWS Graviton
PDF
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
PDF
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
PDF
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
PDF
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
PDF
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
PPT
Teaching material agriculture food technology
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
20250228 LYD VKU AI Blended-Learning.pptx
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
The Rise and Fall of 3GPP – Time for a Sabbatical?
gpt5_lecture_notes_comprehensive_20250812015547.pdf
Accuracy of neural networks in brain wave diagnosis of schizophrenia
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
MIND Revenue Release Quarter 2 2025 Press Release
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
Optimiser vos workloads AI/ML sur Amazon EC2 et AWS Graviton
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
Teaching material agriculture food technology
Ad

2. reliability function

  • 1. 01-02-2012 Reliability Reliability Function • A relative frequency definition of reliability can • Let us put some N items under life test under the be stated as follows: same environmental conditions and observe the If a large number of independent systems/ number of failures at a predetermined interval of subsystems/components are operated at the same y p p time, regularly. Obviously the number of failures time, the R(t) can be estimated to be the ratio of would go on i ld increasing until all th N it i til ll the items putt systems/subsystems/ components still running under test have failed. The test is terminated only over time t and the initial number of when all the items have failed. Let us consider that systems/subsystems/components put to operation. we are considering catastrophic failures only. Let us assume that the number of failures over a time t are: nf (t). Naturally, the survivals shall be: Systems/subsystems/components can be called, in ns(t) = N- nf (t). general, as items. 1 2 Reliability Function Reliability Function • From the definition of probability, we can • The item unreliability likewise can be define reliability as: defined as: • Obviously this definition requires that the • In fact Q(t) shall also be the cumulative test is conducted for a large value of N distribution (cdf) or F(t) if the random under identical conditions of tests and the variable, t , is taken as time-to-failure for tests are conducted independently. the observation, in this test. 3 4 1
  • 2. 01-02-2012 Reliability and Unreliability Reliability Function • Cumulative distribution function can also be defined as: • The cumulative distribution function increases from 0 to 1 as the random variable, t increases from zero to its highest , g value towards infinity. Since at t = 0, the item was operating, Q(t)=F(t)=0, but as • Reliability (Survival Function) is given by: t, F(t) 1. Also, at t = 0, R(t)= 1 and R(t) 0 as t. We also know that the Density Function would be defined by: derivative of cdf of a continuous rv provides probability density function or f(t). 5 6 Reliability Function Reliability Function • By dividing both sides of equation (1), we can define what is known as hazard rate, viz., • Realizing that, we obtain an important relationship: 7 8 2
  • 3. 01-02-2012 Hazard Rate Reliability Function In other words, the hazard rate is the • It is important to highlight at this stage the difference between rate of failing and hazard conditional probability of an rate. At two different points of time, say at t1 and p , y instantaneous failure given that the f g t2, we can have the same rate of failing but as the component is surviving upto time t, number of survivals would go on reducing the hazard rate would not remain the same even if the divided by the length of the short time rate of failing is the same. Hazard rate is a better interval involved. indicator of how hazardous a situation is at a given point of time. 9 10 Reliability Function Reliability Function • It is obvious from the foregoing expressions that • Now reverting to an expression derived earlier, we f(t) is the rate of failing normalized to the have: original population put to test whereas h(t) is the rate of failing normalized to the number of survivals. The difference forms of f(t) and h(t) • We can solve this first order differential equation that can be used to obtain them from the histogram by separable variable technique with initial of life-test data, is given by: condition that at t = 0, R(0) = 1. We then obtain a very important relationship in reliability studies: 11 12 3
  • 4. 01-02-2012 Reliability Function Characterizations Reliability Characteristics of a Unit A probability distribution is completely characterized by each of the following entities: Hazard Rate • Density function (f(t)) f(t), h(t) h(t)=f(t)/R(t) f(t1) • Cumulative distribution function (F(t)) • Reliability (R(t)) • Hazard rate (h(t)) R(t1) Area Q(t1) or F(t1) Area In other words: if one of these entities is known, we t1 can compute the other entities from it. 13 14 Fig. 3.1: Reliability Characteristic of a Unit Case I (Density Function is known) Case II (Distribution Function is known) t f (t )  F ' (t ) F (t )   f ( x )dx 0 R(t )  1  F ( t )  R(t )   f ( x )dx F ' (t ) t h( t )  f (t ) 1  F (t ) h(t )  R( t ) 15 16 4
  • 5. 01-02-2012 Case III (Reliability is known) Reliability and MTTF t   h(u)du f ( t )   R' ( t ) R( t )  e 0 t F ( t )  1  R( t ) Th function The f i (t )  cumulative hazard rate.  h( u)du 0 is called the i ll d h  R' ( t ) The expected lifetime is often called Mean Time To h(t )  Failure (MTTF). R( t ) It is dangerous to make decisions based on MTTF only; never cross the river based on average depth. Consider the variance as well! 17 18 MTTF Reliability Expressions The mean-time-to-failure in case of a continuous • Using the expression: random variable such as time- to- failure, t ,is given • We can obtain the reliability of a unit, which by: follows a given failure distribution or has a   t    i h d F given hazard rate. For example:l   MTTF   tf ( t )dt         du f ( t )dt   f (t )dtdu  R(u)du 1. For h(t) = , we have : 0 00  0u 0 2. For linearly increasing hazard rate, h(t) = This applies equally well to component MTTF, a+bt , we have: subsystem MTTF or even to system MTTF. We must, however, take appropriate reliability of the 19 20 entity. 5
  • 6. 01-02-2012 Reliability Expressions Reliability Expressions 3. If the hazard rate is increasing non-linearly, i.e., • Therefore, if we know the variation of the failure distribution is Weibull or so, with hazard rate with time,we can obtain the hazard rate given by: g y expression for component reliability using the very versatile general expression: The reliability expression would be given by: Where T is the mission time. 21 22 Phases of Life Typical Bathtub Curve • There are three phases of life of any unit. These are: Bathtub curve describes the variation of hazard rate with time, which is generally taken as life of a unit. • Early Life or Infancy Period • Useful Life or Prime of Life • W Wearout Phase or P i d t Ph Period • Each phase has a particular type of failure dominant and has respectively over these three phases of life either decreasing, constant or increasing hazard rate characteristic. These failures result in an overall characteristic over the life time, which apparently looks like a bath tub . Hence the name. 23 24 6
  • 7. 01-02-2012 Early Life Useful Life • Early life has predominantly Quality failures, which • During this period, the hazard rate is very often small show up in early life of a unit and can be traced mainly and approximately constant. It is during this period to the manufacturer’s carelessness and can be that a unit is put to effective use and usefully employed attributed to defective designs, use of substandard during the entire life time. During this period, early or material, poor workmanship or poor quality control. quality failures as well as wear out failures are These failures result in a very high hazard rate in the negligible. O l sudden or catastrophic f il li ibl Only dd hi failures can beginning and keeps decreasing as the time passes. occur, which are primarily caused by sudden and step Early failures can be eliminated through the use of increase in the stress level beyond the design strength. debugging process which consists of operating a unit These failures occur randomly and unexpectedly. under conditions of use for a period of time However their frequency over a long period of time is corresponding to the preponderance of early failures. constant. One cannot eliminate these failures but their The length of debugging period is decided by observing probability can be reduced by improving reliability at the failure distribution and by following a specific the design stage. debugging procedure. This is also known as burn in period. 25 26 Wearout Life Other Hazard Models • As the unit reaches the end of its life, parts begin to • Next slide provides a list of some of the distributions wear out and the hazard rate of the unit begins to rise that are extensively used in reliability studies. But one rapidly. Early or quality failures are very rare during must lose sight of the practicability and not fit a this period and stress related failures occur with the complicated model where it is not actually necessary. same frequency as they occur in other phases of life. The failures that occur d i Th f il h during this period are aptly hi i d l called as gradual or wearout failures and are dominant in old age or towards the end of the life time. These failures keep increasing slowly over the life as the deterioration increases with age and the age at which these become predominant depends on the environment, a unit is operated. It is advisable that the replacement of a unit should be done about the point tw in time. Otherwise the sudden failure may be costly in 27 28 consequences. 7
  • 8. 01-02-2012 Constant Hazard Rate The useful life period of bath tub curve during which catastrophic failures are dominant is often characterized by constant hazard rate thus is best modeled by the exponential failure distribution. The failure process is memoryless and does not recognize the time already elapsed already during the life span. 29 30 Decreasing /Increasing Hazard rates Decreasing /Increasing Hazard rates • Decreasing or increasing hazard rates can be modeled Decreasing/increasing hazard rates can also be modeled using by Weibull distribution by suitably choosing the value Gamma distribution. When  < 1, decreasing hazard rates of parameter . When  < 1, we get reliability function would be described whereas for  > 1, we can obtain corresponding to decreasing Hazard rate. However, if  increasing hazard rates with the help of Gamma distribution. > 1, we get reliability function corresponding to , g y p g increasing Hazard rate. 31 32 8