Can Coached PTSD be detected with the MMPI-2?
December 24, 2006
Stuart J. Clayman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
181 Lake Shore Road
Brighton, MA 02135 USA
Tel. (617) 782-8355
Fax: (617) 254-9053
Email: jay@braindoctor.org
Website: www.braindoctor.org
Blog: http://symptom-magnification.blogspot.com/
I often find that the diagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has been assigned
to claimants in disability, personal injury and workers compensation cases. My
experience is that some claimed instances of PTSD are genuine though some are
exaggerated or faked.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) specifically states
that malingering must be ruled out before the diagnosis of PTSD can be made.
Psychologists, aware that some litigants may exaggerate or fake psychological disorders
such as PTSD, have developed psychological tests containing special scales or strategies
that are used to detect faking. One such test is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality
Inventory, also referred to as the “MMPI-2”. The MMPI-2 contains special “validity
scales” that have been scientifically shown to be effective in detecting exaggeration or
faking of psychological symptoms. The MMPI-2 is probably the most often used measure
of psychopathology that also assesses malingering.
An important question is whether tests, such as the MMPI-2, can distinguish between
faked and genuine PTSD when test-takers are given specific information about PTSD and
about the MMPI-2.
How do litigants obtain information about PTSD? One way that litigants may learn
about PTSD is through exposure to the media. There are more articles in the newspapers
and on TV about PTSD today than in past. This may be especially true at the present
time, during a war, because combatants may be exposed to severely traumatic situations
that can potentially cause mental disorders such as PTSD. In addition, the specific
diagnostic criteria for PTSD and a variety of other information about this disorder is
available on-line. Some litigants may also learn about PTSD and specific techniques to
improve the chances of successful faking PTSD from their attorney. In a study of 70
practicing attorneys and 150 law students conducted in 1995 and published in
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Wetter and Corrigan found that more
Can Coached PTSD be detected with the MMPI-2?, Page 2
Stuart J. Clayman, Ph.D.
than one-third of law students and almost one-half of lawyers believed they were
responsible “to inform the client of scales on psychological tests that are designed to
detect exaggerated or faked responses”.
Utilizing MMPI-2 scales to distinguish between faked and genuine PTSD among
research subjects: Coaching subjects about the symptoms of PTSD or about the validity
scales contained within the MMPI-2 has been employed in investigations of whether the
MMPI-2 can distinguish between faked and genuine PTSD. Bury and Bagby published
such a study in the journal Psychological Assessment in 2002. Investigators in this study
randomly assigned 131 research subjects to one of four groups: “uncoached”, “coached
about PTSD symptom information”, “coached about MMPI-2 validity scales” and
“coached about both symptoms and validity scales”. Following the coaching instructions,
subjects were asked to simulate PTSD on the MMPI-2 test. Results from the MMPI-2
tests of coached subjects were then compared to those of individuals who had developed
genuine PTSD following workplace accidents. Results of this study were similar to those
of previous studies which showed that giving research subjects information about the
symptoms of a mental disorder (in this case, PTSD) did not help them to avoid detection
as fakers. As in previous investigations, individuals who were taught about the validity
scales demonstrated a degree of success in avoiding detection while faking a mental
disorder (PTSD in this study).
Conclusions: The MMPI-2 validity scales demonstrate somewhat reduced capacity to
identify faking when test-takers are provided with validity scale information. However,
the Bury and Bagby study, which provided research subjects with specific information
about avoiding detection by the Fp scale of the MMPI-2, showed that Fp remained
effective in distinguishing between genuine and faked PTSD.
Recommendations: When insurers and attorneys are concerned that a claimant may be
faking PTSD and, especially when there is reason to fear that a claimant may have been
coached in techniques for malingering of PTSD, the MMPI-2 can be very helpful in
differentiating between faked PTSD and the real disorder. For more information about
PTSD and malingering, click on the “articles” button at my website.

More Related Content

PDF
Sfu fitnesselämäntapa ja terveys
DOCX
Final contents page
PPS
en ce moment au cinéma bis
DOCX
Magazine feature article final image
DOCX
Doc12
PPT
Presentacion Diplomado
PDF
MattTabish Resume 2
PDF
Macaroons
Sfu fitnesselämäntapa ja terveys
Final contents page
en ce moment au cinéma bis
Magazine feature article final image
Doc12
Presentacion Diplomado
MattTabish Resume 2
Macaroons

Similar to 2006-12-24 (20)

DOCX
Neuropsychological assessmentKevin Atkinson, Bella Baron, Shon.docx
DOCX
Neuropsychological assessmentKevin Atkinson, Bella Baron, Shon.docx
PPTX
minnesota multi phasic disorder with a disorder ppt.pptx
PPTX
PERSONALITY INVENTORIES
PPTX
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
DOCX
NIMH Fact SheetPost-Traumatic Stress Disorder ResearchWh.docx
DOC
Knowledge Of Applied Psychology
DOC
Research Skills
PPTX
MMPI-3.pptx
PDF
Somatoform and related disorders an update
PPT
Consideration of symptom validity as a routine component of forensic assessme...
PDF
Utility of Cervical Sympathetic Block in Treating Post-Traumatic Stress Disor...
DOCX
Screencast-o-matic link for reviewing Ms. S results httpssc.docx
DOCX
College of Social Sciences .docx
Neuropsychological assessmentKevin Atkinson, Bella Baron, Shon.docx
Neuropsychological assessmentKevin Atkinson, Bella Baron, Shon.docx
minnesota multi phasic disorder with a disorder ppt.pptx
PERSONALITY INVENTORIES
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
NIMH Fact SheetPost-Traumatic Stress Disorder ResearchWh.docx
Knowledge Of Applied Psychology
Research Skills
MMPI-3.pptx
Somatoform and related disorders an update
Consideration of symptom validity as a routine component of forensic assessme...
Utility of Cervical Sympathetic Block in Treating Post-Traumatic Stress Disor...
Screencast-o-matic link for reviewing Ms. S results httpssc.docx
College of Social Sciences .docx
Ad

2006-12-24

  • 1. Can Coached PTSD be detected with the MMPI-2? December 24, 2006 Stuart J. Clayman, Ph.D. Licensed Psychologist 181 Lake Shore Road Brighton, MA 02135 USA Tel. (617) 782-8355 Fax: (617) 254-9053 Email: jay@braindoctor.org Website: www.braindoctor.org Blog: http://symptom-magnification.blogspot.com/ I often find that the diagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has been assigned to claimants in disability, personal injury and workers compensation cases. My experience is that some claimed instances of PTSD are genuine though some are exaggerated or faked. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) specifically states that malingering must be ruled out before the diagnosis of PTSD can be made. Psychologists, aware that some litigants may exaggerate or fake psychological disorders such as PTSD, have developed psychological tests containing special scales or strategies that are used to detect faking. One such test is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, also referred to as the “MMPI-2”. The MMPI-2 contains special “validity scales” that have been scientifically shown to be effective in detecting exaggeration or faking of psychological symptoms. The MMPI-2 is probably the most often used measure of psychopathology that also assesses malingering. An important question is whether tests, such as the MMPI-2, can distinguish between faked and genuine PTSD when test-takers are given specific information about PTSD and about the MMPI-2. How do litigants obtain information about PTSD? One way that litigants may learn about PTSD is through exposure to the media. There are more articles in the newspapers and on TV about PTSD today than in past. This may be especially true at the present time, during a war, because combatants may be exposed to severely traumatic situations that can potentially cause mental disorders such as PTSD. In addition, the specific diagnostic criteria for PTSD and a variety of other information about this disorder is available on-line. Some litigants may also learn about PTSD and specific techniques to improve the chances of successful faking PTSD from their attorney. In a study of 70 practicing attorneys and 150 law students conducted in 1995 and published in Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Wetter and Corrigan found that more
  • 2. Can Coached PTSD be detected with the MMPI-2?, Page 2 Stuart J. Clayman, Ph.D. than one-third of law students and almost one-half of lawyers believed they were responsible “to inform the client of scales on psychological tests that are designed to detect exaggerated or faked responses”. Utilizing MMPI-2 scales to distinguish between faked and genuine PTSD among research subjects: Coaching subjects about the symptoms of PTSD or about the validity scales contained within the MMPI-2 has been employed in investigations of whether the MMPI-2 can distinguish between faked and genuine PTSD. Bury and Bagby published such a study in the journal Psychological Assessment in 2002. Investigators in this study randomly assigned 131 research subjects to one of four groups: “uncoached”, “coached about PTSD symptom information”, “coached about MMPI-2 validity scales” and “coached about both symptoms and validity scales”. Following the coaching instructions, subjects were asked to simulate PTSD on the MMPI-2 test. Results from the MMPI-2 tests of coached subjects were then compared to those of individuals who had developed genuine PTSD following workplace accidents. Results of this study were similar to those of previous studies which showed that giving research subjects information about the symptoms of a mental disorder (in this case, PTSD) did not help them to avoid detection as fakers. As in previous investigations, individuals who were taught about the validity scales demonstrated a degree of success in avoiding detection while faking a mental disorder (PTSD in this study). Conclusions: The MMPI-2 validity scales demonstrate somewhat reduced capacity to identify faking when test-takers are provided with validity scale information. However, the Bury and Bagby study, which provided research subjects with specific information about avoiding detection by the Fp scale of the MMPI-2, showed that Fp remained effective in distinguishing between genuine and faked PTSD. Recommendations: When insurers and attorneys are concerned that a claimant may be faking PTSD and, especially when there is reason to fear that a claimant may have been coached in techniques for malingering of PTSD, the MMPI-2 can be very helpful in differentiating between faked PTSD and the real disorder. For more information about PTSD and malingering, click on the “articles” button at my website.