SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Cover slide Utilization of Genetic Resources Prediction of agricultural traits in plant genetic resources with ecological parameters June 13, 2007, IPK Gatersleben Dag Terje Filip Endresen , Nordic Gene Bank (NGB), Sweden Michael Mackay ,  Australian Winter Cereals Collection (AWCC), Tamworth Agricultural Institute , NSW DPI, Australia Kenneth Street , Project Coordinator, Genetic Resource Unit, ICARDA
TOPICS Utilization of genetic resources: Prediction of agricultural trait values with ecological parameters Distributed information network, data standards, data exchange tools
Utilization Utilization of genetic resources Strategies to improve the utilization of the accessions in the genebank collections are of high priority to increase the genetic diversity of the food crops for enhanced food security. Data access, interoperability Data mining tools
Utilization, data access Utilization of genetic resources, data access Access to user-friendly, interoperable documentation on genetic resources across genebank collections could be a constraint for wider use of the genetic resources conserved in genebanks. Today no global one-stop data portal to access genebank accessions from all parts of the world exists. In Europe the EURISCO search catalogue was developed. Methods to improve data exchange with web services and enhanced interoperability with data standards and ontologies will be explored further. (Examples: TDWG, GBIF, BioCASE, Bioversity International)
Utilization, tools Utilization of genetic resources, data mining tools Perhaps the availability of powerful tools to analyze and find (mine) accessions with a higher probability to have attractive phenotypes for further crop improvement is another constraint for wider utilization. The new methods under development for prediction of agrobotanical traits will be the main topic of this study. This will involve the building of ecological niche models based on the ecological parameters of the site of origin for the genetic resources included in a study. (FIGS, openModeller, GBIF-MAPA)
Trait mining Trait mining with ecological parameters Landraces and other cultivars have been created during cultivation over centuries. The ecological parameters of this culture landscape takes part in forming the cultivated plant material. When searching for suitable genebank accessions for a specific crop improvement program, a breeder may have thousands of candidate accessions. Often only a small number of the candidate accessions have previously been screened for the relevant phenotypic trait characters. Based on the assumption that these trait characters are correlated to the ecological attributes of the site of origin, trait values can be predicted in accessions not yet screened.
Trait mining Trait mining with ecological parameters A subset of accessions with known character expression are used to build a “habitat signature” (niche model) to rank the probability of the different “habitats” to “produce” a valuable phenotypic trait. This niche model is then applied to the ecological parameters of the origin sites to predict desired trait values. The first studies within the FIGS project proved this assumption and generated very interesting results.
Ecological Niche The fundamental ecological niche of an organism was formalized by Hutchinson [1]  in 1957 as a multidimensional hypercube defining the ecological conditions that allow a species to exist. Full understanding of all the environmental conditions for any organism is a monumental task [2] .  Extrapolating of the occurrence localities together with selected associated environmental conditions such as rainfall, temperature, day length etc., an approximation of the fundamental niche can be made. Some popular software implementations for modeling the ecological niche include BioCLIM, DesktopGARP, MaxEnt, etc.
Ecological Niche Ecological niche, trait mining In this study of agrobotanical trait mining, correlation between the trait and this fundamental niche is assumed. The distribution of the studied traits in the spatial space will be correlated to an approximated fundamental ecological niche, or “distribution in the ecological space”. The ecological niche of a trait will be used to predict trait values in the studied dataset of genebank accessions.
Biological status of sample Types of plant genetic resources: Wild relatives of crop species  (MCPD: 100, 200) Landraces , traditional cultivars  (MCPD: 300) Research material, genetic stocks  (MCPD: 400) Modern varieties, advanced cultivars  (MCPD: 500) Multi-Crop Passport Descriptors (SAMPSTAT). FAO, IPGRI (Alercia  et al.  2001) Genetic Resources in Plants (Frankel, 1984, 1970) It is more often the  landraces and non-cultivated types  of plant genetic resources that are targeted as sources of novel genetic variation for breeding activities, especially for overcoming biotic and abiotic stresses.   (Mackay  et al. , 2005; Harlan, 1977)
FIGS Focused Identification of Germplasm Strategy The  FIGS  technology takes much of the guess work out of choosing which accessions are most likely to contain the specific characteristics being sought by plant breeders to improve plant productivity across numerous challenging environments. The development of FIGS was a joint project involving  The  Australian Winter Cereals Collection ( AWCC ),   Tamworth , Australia,  the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas ( ICARDA )  in  Syria, and the N .  I .  Vavilov Research Institute of Plant Industry ( VIR ) in St .  Petersburg, Russia.   [ http://www.figstraitmine.org/ ] [ http://www.bwldb.net/ ]
FIGS The Focused Identification of Germplasm Strategy (FIGS) exploits the relationships between genotype and environment to select sets of collected germplasm containing specified genetic variation.  The coordinates of the collection sites provide the link between germplasm and the environment where it evolved over millennia.  Using geographic information system (GIS) technology, each collection site can be individually profiled for available environmental parameters such as precipitation, humidity, temperature, ago-climatic zoning, and soil characteristics.
http://www.figstraitmine.org
Long-term average precipitation for all collection sites
Logical process Select Parents Identify the Problem Understand  Problem Information & Knowledge Identify Likely Accs. Evaluate Sub Set Breeding & Selection Cultivar
VIR ICARDA AWCC ? USDA ? Database GIS Traits specific selection Figs Set Figs Set Figs Set Figs Set Figs Set Evaluation VIR ICARDA AWCC ? USDA IPK? Database GIS Trait-specific selection Figs Set Figs Set Figs Set Figs Set Figs Set Evaluation
FIGS salinity set
Core and FIGS drought sets    Core accessions    FIGS accessions
After M C Mackay 1995
Distribution of 17,000 bread wheat landraces ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria VIR, St Petersburg, Russia  AWCC, Tamworth, Australia A virtual collection  from these gene banks: www.figstraitmine.com
Origin of Concept : Boron toxicity of wheat and barley example of  late 1980s FIGS What is  F ocused   I dentification  of  G ermplasm   S trategy
Online web application A similar project of inspiration for the PhD research is the GBIF-MAPA. The trait mining methods to be developed in the PhD study will be implemented as a public online web application as well as a downloadable desktop tool. Users will be able to extract occurrence data from the GBIF index and environmental parameters for the sites in a similar manner as with the GBIF-MAPA application.
GBIF-MAPA GBIF-MAPA  Mapping and Analysis Portal Application Survey Gap Analysis .   The survey gap analysis (SGA) tool helps you design a biodiversity survey that will best complement the existing survey effort by identifying those areas least well surveyed in terms of environmental conditions.  Species Richness Assessment .   Use this tool to provide an estimate, from GBIF data, of the number of species recorded in an area; and to gain insight into the adequacy of sampling based on abundance distributions for those species. Environment Values Extraction .   Query a range of environmental layers (e.g. climate) using GBIF species record point data to create a table showing the environmental values at those points. This data can then be used in your own statistical analyses. The main target of the GBIF-MAPA is  users who have a  focus on  conservation planning and habitat conservation . GBIF-MAPA is developed by  researchers from  the Australian Museum, the University of Colorado  (Boulder, Colorado, USA) and the New South  Wales Department of Environment and Conservation [http://gbifmapa.austmus.gov.au/mapa/]
openModeller The openModeller project aims to provide a flexible, user friendly, cross-platform environment where the entire process of conducting a fundamental niche modeling experiment can be carried out. The software includes facilities for reading species occurrence and environmental data, selection of environmental layers on which the model should be based, creating a fundamental niche model and projecting the model into an environmental scenario.   [ http://openmodeller.sourceforge.net/ ] The project is currently being developed by the Centro de Referência em Informação Ambiental  (CRIA) , Escola Politécnica da USP  (Poli) , and Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais  (INPE)  as an open-source initiative.
openModeller openModeller was initiated in 2003 by CRIA (Brazil). Developed in C++ and cross-platform, MS Widows, Mac OS X, and Linux. Open Source freely available under the GPL license. A plug-in architecture and have today plug-in for a number of fundamental niche modeling algorithms.  (Bioclim [ Bioclimatic Envelopes] , GARP, CSM [ Climate Space Model] , Environmental Distance and others) There is a user-friendly desktop version, a web service API based on SOAP, a CGI application and a console interface for the command line. Occurrence data can be retrieved directly from GBIF in the openModeller Desktop application to start a new experiment. openModeller Desktop comes with a mapping module to visualize the predicted niche model (species) distribution on a map view.
Phenotype  agricultural traits
Phenotype data NGB has developed a tool to preview evaluation and characterization data.  © NGB, 2003, GPL 2.0, (Morten Hulden, 2001) Dynamic Evaluation Data Analyzer:   [http://www.nordgen.org/sesto/index.php?scp=ngb&thm=observations] When an individual trait character is selected the results are displayed split on variation by observation site  variation by observation year  variation in observed tax on   variation in observed  biological status of sample  (wild relative, landrace, advanced cultivar…)   variation by country of origin  variation in observed accessions   …  or any other useful categories  as defined by the responsible  administrator.
Phenotype
http://barley.ipk-gatersleben.de/genres Template slide
http://barley.ipk-gatersleben.de/genres …  screen dump cropped  Screen dump continued…
Data Standards
TDWG :: SDD Structured Descriptive Data In taxonomy, descriptive data takes a number of very different forms.  Natural-language descriptions are semi-structured, semi-formalised descriptions of a taxon (or occasionally of an individual specimen). They may be simple, short and written in plain language (if used for a popular field guide), or long, highly formal and using specialised terminology when used in a taxonomic monograph or other treatment.  The goal of the SDD standard is to allow capture, transport, caching and archiving of descriptive data in all the forms shown above, using a platform- and application-independent, international standard. Such a standard is crucial to enabling lossless porting of data between existing and future software platforms including identification, data-mining and analysis tools, and federated databases.  Hagedorn, G.; Thiele, K.; Morris, R. & Heidorn, P. B. 2005. The Structured Descriptive Data (SDD) w3c-xml-schema, version 1.0. [ http://www. tdwg .org/standards/116/] . [Retrieved 05-May-2007 ]  [ http://www.tdwg.org/standards/116/ ]
Crop Descriptors The Bioversity International (IPGRI)  crop descriptors  are developed to standardize characterization and evaluation data – called “descriptive data” in TDWG context. The MCPD (Multi Crop Passport Descriptors) is designed to standardize "passport  data" across crops. It enables compatibility with the crop specific descriptor lists and the FAO World Information and Early Warning System (WIEWS) and serves as a  basis for data exchange. The  MCPD  descriptor list was made fully compatible with ABCD 2.06
Taxonomic Database Working Group Darwin Core 2  - Element definitions designed to support the sharing and integration of primary biodiversity data".   [http://darwincore.calacademy.org/] Access to Biological Collection Data (ABCD) 2.06  - An evolving comprehensive standard for the access to and exchange of data about specimens and observations (a.k.a. primary biodiversity data)“. [http://www.bgbm.org/TDWG/CODATA/Schema/]
ABCD   A ccess to  B iological  C ollection  D ata ABCD  is a  common data specification  for data on biological specimens and observations  (including the plant genetic resources seed banks). The design goal is to be both  comprehensive  and  general   (about 1200 elements). Development of the ABCD started after the  2000  meeting of the TDWG. ABCD was developed with support from  TDWG/CODATA , ENHSIN, BioCASE, and GBIF. The  MCPD  descriptor list is completely mapped and compatible to ABCD 2.06
Generation Challenge Programme,  GCP_Passport_1.04 The Generation Challenge Programme is a research and capacity building network that uses plant genetic diversity to produce better crop varieties for resource-poor farmers.  In the context of the GCP (Generation Challenge Programme), the  GCP  Passport  data exchange schema was developed.
W3C :: RDF Resource Description Framework Scenario: You have a dataset of genebank accessions with pointers to the source datasets of the holding genebanks. You produce phenotypic evaluation data on accessions in this dataset. You find evaluation data from other sources on some of the accessions in your dataset. Some of the evaluation data are produced in areas of different day length, rainfall, soils… Some of the accessions in your dataset originate from areas of higher population densities; other accessions originate from more natural habitats. Unfortunately most of the different sources of information are located on different web sites and it is difficult to bring the information together. You  would need to go through more or less the same process  as other researchers in many domains  of gathering heterogeneous data from multiple sources, combining and analysing it. This is the challenge that faces the web as a whole and is being addressed by the  Semantic Web  project.  RDFs can assist you to relate information from different sources. A RDF triplet looks like this:  subject-predicate-object  <rdf:Description rdf:about=&quot;http://www.example.org/index.html&quot;>   <dc:creator>John Smith</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> anytime   approximate   case study   diagnosis   inconsistent   kads banana  apples   stem color  knowledge based systems   knowledge level   knowledge management   knowledge representation   LSID   accession number   GUID  unitID  ontology   owl  parametric design  Full Scientific Name   peer to peer systems   problem solving  landrace   traditional cultivar   300  methods   rdf   rdf  WEB2  ABCD  SDD  semantic web   semantics   specification languages   web based   web ontology   INSTCODE  plant genetic resources  germplasm  agricultural traits  Aegilops
Life Science IDentifiers LSID is a digital name tag. LSIDs are GUIDs, Global Unique Identifiers. [http://lsid.sourceforge.net/] Structure  urn:lsid: authority : namespace : object : revision Example (fictive)  urn:lsid:eurisco.org:accession:H451269 The LSID concept introduces a straightforward approach to naming and identifying data resources stored in multiple, distributed data stores . LSID  define s  a simple, common way to identify and access biologically significant data ;  whether that data is stored in files, relational databases, in applications, or in internal or public data sources, LSID provides a naming standard  to support  interoperability. Developed by OMG-LSR and W3C, implemented by IBM. W3C/TDWG :: LSID
Biodiversity data exchange tools
Data Provider Software DiGIR ,  Di stributed  G eneric  I nformation  R etrieval.   [http://digir.net] PyWrapper,  based on the BioCASE Python wrapper software. [http://www.pywrapper.org/]
Decentralized model
Outlook The compatibility of data standards between PGR and biodiversity collections made it possible to integrate the worldwide germplasm collections into the biodiversity community. Using GBIF technology (and contributing to its development), the PGR community can easily establish specific PGR networks without duplicating GBIF's work. Use of GBIF technology and integration of PGR collection data into GBIF allows PGR users to simultaneously search PGR collections and other biodiversity collections, and to  get access to the data (and possibly the material) of relevant biodiversity collections.  The same data sharing methods can also be applied to germplasm trait data. Agrobotanical phenotype characters could be described by common global standard and shared with the same data exchange tools as the accession passport data.
Thank you for listening!

More Related Content

PDF
GBIF-Norway at NMBU, January 2015
PDF
GBIF BIFA mentoring, Day 4b Event core, July 2016
PPTX
Intro to GBIF: Infrastructures and Platforms for Environmental Crowd Sensing ...
PDF
#HepaticaWeek April 2016, GBIF data publishing
PDF
GBIF and Open Science
PDF
GBIF towards 2030 (November 2018)
PDF
European agrobiodioversity, ECPGR network meeting on EURISCO, Central Crop Da...
PDF
GBIF BIFA mentoring, Day 1 GBIF intro, July 2016
GBIF-Norway at NMBU, January 2015
GBIF BIFA mentoring, Day 4b Event core, July 2016
Intro to GBIF: Infrastructures and Platforms for Environmental Crowd Sensing ...
#HepaticaWeek April 2016, GBIF data publishing
GBIF and Open Science
GBIF towards 2030 (November 2018)
European agrobiodioversity, ECPGR network meeting on EURISCO, Central Crop Da...
GBIF BIFA mentoring, Day 1 GBIF intro, July 2016

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Germplasm data exchange, CGIAR SINGER (2009)
PDF
GBIF and Biodiversity informatics for museums, 15 March 2021
PDF
2016-10-12 MUSIT & GBIF - Dataset portals
PDF
Global Biodiversity Information Facility - 2013
PDF
Museum collections as research data - October 2019
PPT
Web services for sharing germplasm data sets, at FAO in Rome (2006)
PDF
BioDATA capacity enhancement curriculum at GBIF GB26 Global Nodes Meeting in ...
PDF
Introduction to GBIF. GBIF seminar in Bergen. 2016-12-14
PDF
GBIF data portal, ECPGR working group (2017-03-16)
PDF
FAIR and open biodiversity collection data management
PDF
Darwin Core extension for germplasm (11th December 2013)
PDF
GBIF and reuse of research data, Bergen (2016-12-14)
PDF
GBIF BIFA mentoring, Day 2 Publish data, July 2016
PDF
GBIF BIFA mentoring, Day 5a Data management, July 2016
PDF
The Biodiversity Informatics Landscape
PDF
GBIF data publishing. GBIF seminar in Bergen. 2016-12-14
PDF
Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) - 2012
PDF
2021-01-27--biodiversity-informatics-gbif-(52slides)
PDF
GBIF & GRScicoll, Høstseminar Norges museumsforbunds Seksjon for natur, 2021-...
PDF
TDWG VoMaG Vocabulary management workflow, 2013-10-31
Germplasm data exchange, CGIAR SINGER (2009)
GBIF and Biodiversity informatics for museums, 15 March 2021
2016-10-12 MUSIT & GBIF - Dataset portals
Global Biodiversity Information Facility - 2013
Museum collections as research data - October 2019
Web services for sharing germplasm data sets, at FAO in Rome (2006)
BioDATA capacity enhancement curriculum at GBIF GB26 Global Nodes Meeting in ...
Introduction to GBIF. GBIF seminar in Bergen. 2016-12-14
GBIF data portal, ECPGR working group (2017-03-16)
FAIR and open biodiversity collection data management
Darwin Core extension for germplasm (11th December 2013)
GBIF and reuse of research data, Bergen (2016-12-14)
GBIF BIFA mentoring, Day 2 Publish data, July 2016
GBIF BIFA mentoring, Day 5a Data management, July 2016
The Biodiversity Informatics Landscape
GBIF data publishing. GBIF seminar in Bergen. 2016-12-14
Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) - 2012
2021-01-27--biodiversity-informatics-gbif-(52slides)
GBIF & GRScicoll, Høstseminar Norges museumsforbunds Seksjon for natur, 2021-...
TDWG VoMaG Vocabulary management workflow, 2013-10-31
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPSX
Genetic Resources, The role of the egyptian deserts gene bank to Conservation...
PPT
2012. Ruaraidh Sackville Hamilton. International treaty on plant genetic reso...
PPT
A global information portal to facilitate and promote accessibility and ratio...
PDF
Home Gardens & In Situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources in Farming Sys...
PDF
Impact of germplasm conservation
PPT
The sustainable maintenance and utilization of plant genetic resources in Egy...
 
PPTX
Plant genetic resources and climate change
PPT
EcoPhysiology
PPTX
Ecogeographic core collections and FIGS
PPTX
National PGR Strategy for Jordan
 
PPTX
Experiment 9 plant growth regulation
PPTX
Tilling and Ecotilling for crop improvement
PPTX
The strategic action plan to strengthen the conservation and use of Mesoameri...
PPTX
Allele mining
PPT
Plant Germ Plasm Resource And Its Utilizations.
PPTX
Biodivarsity ppt
PPTX
Allele mining, tilling and eco tilling
PPT
PPTX
Conservation and availability of plant genetic diversity
PPTX
Next generation plant growth regulators in horticulture production
Genetic Resources, The role of the egyptian deserts gene bank to Conservation...
2012. Ruaraidh Sackville Hamilton. International treaty on plant genetic reso...
A global information portal to facilitate and promote accessibility and ratio...
Home Gardens & In Situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources in Farming Sys...
Impact of germplasm conservation
The sustainable maintenance and utilization of plant genetic resources in Egy...
 
Plant genetic resources and climate change
EcoPhysiology
Ecogeographic core collections and FIGS
National PGR Strategy for Jordan
 
Experiment 9 plant growth regulation
Tilling and Ecotilling for crop improvement
The strategic action plan to strengthen the conservation and use of Mesoameri...
Allele mining
Plant Germ Plasm Resource And Its Utilizations.
Biodivarsity ppt
Allele mining, tilling and eco tilling
Conservation and availability of plant genetic diversity
Next generation plant growth regulators in horticulture production
Ad

Similar to Trait data mining using FIGS (2006) (20)

PPTX
NOVA PhD training course on pre-breeding, Nordic University Network (2012)
PPTX
Predictive association between trait data and eco-geographic data for Nordic ...
PPTX
Presentation1 - Basis of application of Ecogeography in PGR
PPTX
Presentation1 ecogeographic basis
PDF
Castaneda2009 Modelamiento Distribucion Especies
PDF
Trait data mining using FIGS, seminar at Copenhagen University (27 May 2009)
PDF
Trait data mining at European pre-breeding workshop at Alnarp (25 Nov 2009)
PPTX
FIGS workshop in Madrid, PGR Secure (9 to 13 January 2012)
PDF
Trait data mining seminar at the Carlsberg research institute (CRI) (4 Nov 2009)
PPTX
Castaneda2013 capfitogen
PPTX
Conservation and monitoring of pgrs and gene banks
PPTX
Searching for traits in PGR collections using Focused Identification of Germp...
PPTX
Análisis de vacíos en parientes silvestres
PPTX
Approach in Plant Genetic Resource Management
PDF
01 pgr data base management
PPTX
Castaneda2013 capfitogen bases_de_datos
PPTX
New predictive characterization methods for accessing and using crop wild rel...
PPT
Plant genetic resources their utilization and conservation in crop improvement
PPTX
GERMPLASM CONSERVATION: CONSERVING DIVERSITY
PPT
Amman Workshop #2 - M MacKay
NOVA PhD training course on pre-breeding, Nordic University Network (2012)
Predictive association between trait data and eco-geographic data for Nordic ...
Presentation1 - Basis of application of Ecogeography in PGR
Presentation1 ecogeographic basis
Castaneda2009 Modelamiento Distribucion Especies
Trait data mining using FIGS, seminar at Copenhagen University (27 May 2009)
Trait data mining at European pre-breeding workshop at Alnarp (25 Nov 2009)
FIGS workshop in Madrid, PGR Secure (9 to 13 January 2012)
Trait data mining seminar at the Carlsberg research institute (CRI) (4 Nov 2009)
Castaneda2013 capfitogen
Conservation and monitoring of pgrs and gene banks
Searching for traits in PGR collections using Focused Identification of Germp...
Análisis de vacíos en parientes silvestres
Approach in Plant Genetic Resource Management
01 pgr data base management
Castaneda2013 capfitogen bases_de_datos
New predictive characterization methods for accessing and using crop wild rel...
Plant genetic resources their utilization and conservation in crop improvement
GERMPLASM CONSERVATION: CONSERVING DIVERSITY
Amman Workshop #2 - M MacKay

More from Dag Endresen (19)

PDF
Joint GBIF Biodiversa+ symposium in Helsinki on 2024-04-16
PDF
Iliad webinar 2024-03-13, Accessing and publishing marine biodiversity data i...
PDF
Modelling Research Expeditions in Wikidata: Best Practice for Standardisation...
PDF
Ontologies for biodiversity informatics, UiO DSC June 2023
PDF
Evacuation of the Kherson herbarium
PDF
2023-05-08 GLIS SAC Rome
PDF
BioDT for the UiO Science section meeting 2023-03-24
PDF
Data and Stats Forum at MINA NMBU - 2023-04-26
PPTX
BioDATA final conference in Oslo, November 2022
PDF
GBIF data mobilisation for the Nansen Legacy, Tromsø, 2022-09-20
PDF
GBIF at Living Norway Open Science Lab 2022-03-03
PDF
Råd fra GBIF-Norge til datainfrastrukturutvalget i dialogmøte 2021-11-19
PDF
The role of biodiversity informatics in GBIF, 2021-05-18
PDF
GBIF-Norway node story lightning talk at GB26 in Leiden, October 2019
PDF
Open science curriculum for students, June 2019
PDF
Event core and new datatypes in GBIF - 10th European GBIF Nodes Meeting in Ta...
PDF
GBIF/OBIS hackathon in Brussels January 2018
PDF
Reuse of biodiversity data published in GBIF, November 2017
PDF
GBIF lunch seminar at UiO Natural History Museum in Oslo, 2017-03-30
Joint GBIF Biodiversa+ symposium in Helsinki on 2024-04-16
Iliad webinar 2024-03-13, Accessing and publishing marine biodiversity data i...
Modelling Research Expeditions in Wikidata: Best Practice for Standardisation...
Ontologies for biodiversity informatics, UiO DSC June 2023
Evacuation of the Kherson herbarium
2023-05-08 GLIS SAC Rome
BioDT for the UiO Science section meeting 2023-03-24
Data and Stats Forum at MINA NMBU - 2023-04-26
BioDATA final conference in Oslo, November 2022
GBIF data mobilisation for the Nansen Legacy, Tromsø, 2022-09-20
GBIF at Living Norway Open Science Lab 2022-03-03
Råd fra GBIF-Norge til datainfrastrukturutvalget i dialogmøte 2021-11-19
The role of biodiversity informatics in GBIF, 2021-05-18
GBIF-Norway node story lightning talk at GB26 in Leiden, October 2019
Open science curriculum for students, June 2019
Event core and new datatypes in GBIF - 10th European GBIF Nodes Meeting in Ta...
GBIF/OBIS hackathon in Brussels January 2018
Reuse of biodiversity data published in GBIF, November 2017
GBIF lunch seminar at UiO Natural History Museum in Oslo, 2017-03-30

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Spectroscopy.pptx food analysis technology
PDF
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
PPTX
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
PPTX
Tartificialntelligence_presentation.pptx
PPTX
Machine Learning_overview_presentation.pptx
PDF
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
PDF
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
PDF
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
PDF
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
PDF
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
PDF
Video forgery: An extensive analysis of inter-and intra-frame manipulation al...
PPTX
1. Introduction to Computer Programming.pptx
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II
PDF
A comparative analysis of optical character recognition models for extracting...
PDF
Accuracy of neural networks in brain wave diagnosis of schizophrenia
PDF
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
PDF
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
PDF
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
PDF
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
PPTX
SOPHOS-XG Firewall Administrator PPT.pptx
Spectroscopy.pptx food analysis technology
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
Tartificialntelligence_presentation.pptx
Machine Learning_overview_presentation.pptx
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
Video forgery: An extensive analysis of inter-and intra-frame manipulation al...
1. Introduction to Computer Programming.pptx
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II
A comparative analysis of optical character recognition models for extracting...
Accuracy of neural networks in brain wave diagnosis of schizophrenia
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
SOPHOS-XG Firewall Administrator PPT.pptx

Trait data mining using FIGS (2006)

  • 1. Cover slide Utilization of Genetic Resources Prediction of agricultural traits in plant genetic resources with ecological parameters June 13, 2007, IPK Gatersleben Dag Terje Filip Endresen , Nordic Gene Bank (NGB), Sweden Michael Mackay , Australian Winter Cereals Collection (AWCC), Tamworth Agricultural Institute , NSW DPI, Australia Kenneth Street , Project Coordinator, Genetic Resource Unit, ICARDA
  • 2. TOPICS Utilization of genetic resources: Prediction of agricultural trait values with ecological parameters Distributed information network, data standards, data exchange tools
  • 3. Utilization Utilization of genetic resources Strategies to improve the utilization of the accessions in the genebank collections are of high priority to increase the genetic diversity of the food crops for enhanced food security. Data access, interoperability Data mining tools
  • 4. Utilization, data access Utilization of genetic resources, data access Access to user-friendly, interoperable documentation on genetic resources across genebank collections could be a constraint for wider use of the genetic resources conserved in genebanks. Today no global one-stop data portal to access genebank accessions from all parts of the world exists. In Europe the EURISCO search catalogue was developed. Methods to improve data exchange with web services and enhanced interoperability with data standards and ontologies will be explored further. (Examples: TDWG, GBIF, BioCASE, Bioversity International)
  • 5. Utilization, tools Utilization of genetic resources, data mining tools Perhaps the availability of powerful tools to analyze and find (mine) accessions with a higher probability to have attractive phenotypes for further crop improvement is another constraint for wider utilization. The new methods under development for prediction of agrobotanical traits will be the main topic of this study. This will involve the building of ecological niche models based on the ecological parameters of the site of origin for the genetic resources included in a study. (FIGS, openModeller, GBIF-MAPA)
  • 6. Trait mining Trait mining with ecological parameters Landraces and other cultivars have been created during cultivation over centuries. The ecological parameters of this culture landscape takes part in forming the cultivated plant material. When searching for suitable genebank accessions for a specific crop improvement program, a breeder may have thousands of candidate accessions. Often only a small number of the candidate accessions have previously been screened for the relevant phenotypic trait characters. Based on the assumption that these trait characters are correlated to the ecological attributes of the site of origin, trait values can be predicted in accessions not yet screened.
  • 7. Trait mining Trait mining with ecological parameters A subset of accessions with known character expression are used to build a “habitat signature” (niche model) to rank the probability of the different “habitats” to “produce” a valuable phenotypic trait. This niche model is then applied to the ecological parameters of the origin sites to predict desired trait values. The first studies within the FIGS project proved this assumption and generated very interesting results.
  • 8. Ecological Niche The fundamental ecological niche of an organism was formalized by Hutchinson [1] in 1957 as a multidimensional hypercube defining the ecological conditions that allow a species to exist. Full understanding of all the environmental conditions for any organism is a monumental task [2] . Extrapolating of the occurrence localities together with selected associated environmental conditions such as rainfall, temperature, day length etc., an approximation of the fundamental niche can be made. Some popular software implementations for modeling the ecological niche include BioCLIM, DesktopGARP, MaxEnt, etc.
  • 9. Ecological Niche Ecological niche, trait mining In this study of agrobotanical trait mining, correlation between the trait and this fundamental niche is assumed. The distribution of the studied traits in the spatial space will be correlated to an approximated fundamental ecological niche, or “distribution in the ecological space”. The ecological niche of a trait will be used to predict trait values in the studied dataset of genebank accessions.
  • 10. Biological status of sample Types of plant genetic resources: Wild relatives of crop species (MCPD: 100, 200) Landraces , traditional cultivars (MCPD: 300) Research material, genetic stocks (MCPD: 400) Modern varieties, advanced cultivars (MCPD: 500) Multi-Crop Passport Descriptors (SAMPSTAT). FAO, IPGRI (Alercia et al. 2001) Genetic Resources in Plants (Frankel, 1984, 1970) It is more often the landraces and non-cultivated types of plant genetic resources that are targeted as sources of novel genetic variation for breeding activities, especially for overcoming biotic and abiotic stresses. (Mackay et al. , 2005; Harlan, 1977)
  • 11. FIGS Focused Identification of Germplasm Strategy The FIGS technology takes much of the guess work out of choosing which accessions are most likely to contain the specific characteristics being sought by plant breeders to improve plant productivity across numerous challenging environments. The development of FIGS was a joint project involving The Australian Winter Cereals Collection ( AWCC ), Tamworth , Australia, the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas ( ICARDA ) in Syria, and the N .  I . Vavilov Research Institute of Plant Industry ( VIR ) in St . Petersburg, Russia. [ http://www.figstraitmine.org/ ] [ http://www.bwldb.net/ ]
  • 12. FIGS The Focused Identification of Germplasm Strategy (FIGS) exploits the relationships between genotype and environment to select sets of collected germplasm containing specified genetic variation. The coordinates of the collection sites provide the link between germplasm and the environment where it evolved over millennia. Using geographic information system (GIS) technology, each collection site can be individually profiled for available environmental parameters such as precipitation, humidity, temperature, ago-climatic zoning, and soil characteristics.
  • 14. Long-term average precipitation for all collection sites
  • 15. Logical process Select Parents Identify the Problem Understand Problem Information & Knowledge Identify Likely Accs. Evaluate Sub Set Breeding & Selection Cultivar
  • 16. VIR ICARDA AWCC ? USDA ? Database GIS Traits specific selection Figs Set Figs Set Figs Set Figs Set Figs Set Evaluation VIR ICARDA AWCC ? USDA IPK? Database GIS Trait-specific selection Figs Set Figs Set Figs Set Figs Set Figs Set Evaluation
  • 18. Core and FIGS drought sets  Core accessions  FIGS accessions
  • 19. After M C Mackay 1995
  • 20. Distribution of 17,000 bread wheat landraces ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria VIR, St Petersburg, Russia AWCC, Tamworth, Australia A virtual collection from these gene banks: www.figstraitmine.com
  • 21. Origin of Concept : Boron toxicity of wheat and barley example of late 1980s FIGS What is F ocused I dentification of G ermplasm S trategy
  • 22. Online web application A similar project of inspiration for the PhD research is the GBIF-MAPA. The trait mining methods to be developed in the PhD study will be implemented as a public online web application as well as a downloadable desktop tool. Users will be able to extract occurrence data from the GBIF index and environmental parameters for the sites in a similar manner as with the GBIF-MAPA application.
  • 23. GBIF-MAPA GBIF-MAPA Mapping and Analysis Portal Application Survey Gap Analysis . The survey gap analysis (SGA) tool helps you design a biodiversity survey that will best complement the existing survey effort by identifying those areas least well surveyed in terms of environmental conditions. Species Richness Assessment . Use this tool to provide an estimate, from GBIF data, of the number of species recorded in an area; and to gain insight into the adequacy of sampling based on abundance distributions for those species. Environment Values Extraction . Query a range of environmental layers (e.g. climate) using GBIF species record point data to create a table showing the environmental values at those points. This data can then be used in your own statistical analyses. The main target of the GBIF-MAPA is users who have a focus on conservation planning and habitat conservation . GBIF-MAPA is developed by researchers from the Australian Museum, the University of Colorado (Boulder, Colorado, USA) and the New South Wales Department of Environment and Conservation [http://gbifmapa.austmus.gov.au/mapa/]
  • 24. openModeller The openModeller project aims to provide a flexible, user friendly, cross-platform environment where the entire process of conducting a fundamental niche modeling experiment can be carried out. The software includes facilities for reading species occurrence and environmental data, selection of environmental layers on which the model should be based, creating a fundamental niche model and projecting the model into an environmental scenario.   [ http://openmodeller.sourceforge.net/ ] The project is currently being developed by the Centro de Referência em Informação Ambiental (CRIA) , Escola Politécnica da USP (Poli) , and Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE) as an open-source initiative.
  • 25. openModeller openModeller was initiated in 2003 by CRIA (Brazil). Developed in C++ and cross-platform, MS Widows, Mac OS X, and Linux. Open Source freely available under the GPL license. A plug-in architecture and have today plug-in for a number of fundamental niche modeling algorithms. (Bioclim [ Bioclimatic Envelopes] , GARP, CSM [ Climate Space Model] , Environmental Distance and others) There is a user-friendly desktop version, a web service API based on SOAP, a CGI application and a console interface for the command line. Occurrence data can be retrieved directly from GBIF in the openModeller Desktop application to start a new experiment. openModeller Desktop comes with a mapping module to visualize the predicted niche model (species) distribution on a map view.
  • 27. Phenotype data NGB has developed a tool to preview evaluation and characterization data. © NGB, 2003, GPL 2.0, (Morten Hulden, 2001) Dynamic Evaluation Data Analyzer: [http://www.nordgen.org/sesto/index.php?scp=ngb&thm=observations] When an individual trait character is selected the results are displayed split on variation by observation site variation by observation year variation in observed tax on variation in observed biological status of sample (wild relative, landrace, advanced cultivar…) variation by country of origin variation in observed accessions … or any other useful categories as defined by the responsible administrator.
  • 30. http://barley.ipk-gatersleben.de/genres … screen dump cropped Screen dump continued…
  • 32. TDWG :: SDD Structured Descriptive Data In taxonomy, descriptive data takes a number of very different forms. Natural-language descriptions are semi-structured, semi-formalised descriptions of a taxon (or occasionally of an individual specimen). They may be simple, short and written in plain language (if used for a popular field guide), or long, highly formal and using specialised terminology when used in a taxonomic monograph or other treatment. The goal of the SDD standard is to allow capture, transport, caching and archiving of descriptive data in all the forms shown above, using a platform- and application-independent, international standard. Such a standard is crucial to enabling lossless porting of data between existing and future software platforms including identification, data-mining and analysis tools, and federated databases. Hagedorn, G.; Thiele, K.; Morris, R. & Heidorn, P. B. 2005. The Structured Descriptive Data (SDD) w3c-xml-schema, version 1.0. [ http://www. tdwg .org/standards/116/] . [Retrieved 05-May-2007 ] [ http://www.tdwg.org/standards/116/ ]
  • 33. Crop Descriptors The Bioversity International (IPGRI) crop descriptors are developed to standardize characterization and evaluation data – called “descriptive data” in TDWG context. The MCPD (Multi Crop Passport Descriptors) is designed to standardize &quot;passport data&quot; across crops. It enables compatibility with the crop specific descriptor lists and the FAO World Information and Early Warning System (WIEWS) and serves as a basis for data exchange. The MCPD descriptor list was made fully compatible with ABCD 2.06
  • 34. Taxonomic Database Working Group Darwin Core 2 - Element definitions designed to support the sharing and integration of primary biodiversity data&quot;. [http://darwincore.calacademy.org/] Access to Biological Collection Data (ABCD) 2.06 - An evolving comprehensive standard for the access to and exchange of data about specimens and observations (a.k.a. primary biodiversity data)“. [http://www.bgbm.org/TDWG/CODATA/Schema/]
  • 35. ABCD A ccess to B iological C ollection D ata ABCD is a common data specification for data on biological specimens and observations (including the plant genetic resources seed banks). The design goal is to be both comprehensive and general (about 1200 elements). Development of the ABCD started after the 2000 meeting of the TDWG. ABCD was developed with support from TDWG/CODATA , ENHSIN, BioCASE, and GBIF. The MCPD descriptor list is completely mapped and compatible to ABCD 2.06
  • 36. Generation Challenge Programme, GCP_Passport_1.04 The Generation Challenge Programme is a research and capacity building network that uses plant genetic diversity to produce better crop varieties for resource-poor farmers. In the context of the GCP (Generation Challenge Programme), the GCP Passport data exchange schema was developed.
  • 37. W3C :: RDF Resource Description Framework Scenario: You have a dataset of genebank accessions with pointers to the source datasets of the holding genebanks. You produce phenotypic evaluation data on accessions in this dataset. You find evaluation data from other sources on some of the accessions in your dataset. Some of the evaluation data are produced in areas of different day length, rainfall, soils… Some of the accessions in your dataset originate from areas of higher population densities; other accessions originate from more natural habitats. Unfortunately most of the different sources of information are located on different web sites and it is difficult to bring the information together. You would need to go through more or less the same process as other researchers in many domains of gathering heterogeneous data from multiple sources, combining and analysing it. This is the challenge that faces the web as a whole and is being addressed by the Semantic Web project. RDFs can assist you to relate information from different sources. A RDF triplet looks like this: subject-predicate-object <rdf:Description rdf:about=&quot;http://www.example.org/index.html&quot;> <dc:creator>John Smith</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> anytime approximate case study diagnosis inconsistent kads banana apples stem color knowledge based systems knowledge level knowledge management knowledge representation LSID accession number GUID unitID ontology owl parametric design Full Scientific Name peer to peer systems problem solving landrace traditional cultivar 300 methods rdf rdf WEB2 ABCD SDD semantic web semantics specification languages web based web ontology INSTCODE plant genetic resources germplasm agricultural traits Aegilops
  • 38. Life Science IDentifiers LSID is a digital name tag. LSIDs are GUIDs, Global Unique Identifiers. [http://lsid.sourceforge.net/] Structure urn:lsid: authority : namespace : object : revision Example (fictive) urn:lsid:eurisco.org:accession:H451269 The LSID concept introduces a straightforward approach to naming and identifying data resources stored in multiple, distributed data stores . LSID define s a simple, common way to identify and access biologically significant data ; whether that data is stored in files, relational databases, in applications, or in internal or public data sources, LSID provides a naming standard to support interoperability. Developed by OMG-LSR and W3C, implemented by IBM. W3C/TDWG :: LSID
  • 40. Data Provider Software DiGIR , Di stributed G eneric I nformation R etrieval. [http://digir.net] PyWrapper, based on the BioCASE Python wrapper software. [http://www.pywrapper.org/]
  • 42. Outlook The compatibility of data standards between PGR and biodiversity collections made it possible to integrate the worldwide germplasm collections into the biodiversity community. Using GBIF technology (and contributing to its development), the PGR community can easily establish specific PGR networks without duplicating GBIF's work. Use of GBIF technology and integration of PGR collection data into GBIF allows PGR users to simultaneously search PGR collections and other biodiversity collections, and to get access to the data (and possibly the material) of relevant biodiversity collections. The same data sharing methods can also be applied to germplasm trait data. Agrobotanical phenotype characters could be described by common global standard and shared with the same data exchange tools as the accession passport data.
  • 43. Thank you for listening!

Editor's Notes

  • #2: 13-JUN-2007 10:00 AM . Seminarraum der Genbank . Vavilov-Seminar . Pr ediction of agricultural traits in plant genetic resources with ecological parameters ; Dag Terje Filip Endresen Nordic Gene Bank, Alnarp, Sweden . Host: Dr. H. Knüpffer [http://www.ipk-gatersleben.de/Internet/Veranstaltungen/KolloquienSeminare]
  • #3: Some keywords; the main topics of the talk
  • #4: Image:
  • #5: Image: Wine grapes, field trip during a PGR Forum workshop at the Azores (2004). Photographer Dag Terje Endresen (NGB Picture Archive, image 003869)
  • #6: Image: A field of sugar beet at Alnarp. Sugar B eet ( Beta vulgaris L.) . Photographer Dag Terje Endresen (NGB Picture Archive, image 003896)
  • #9: [ 1 ] Hutchinson, G.E. (1957). Concluding Remarks. In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 22: 415-42. [2] Sutton, T., R. de Giovanni, M. F. de Siqureira (2007). Introducing openModeller . OSGeo Journal volume 1, May 2007. [ http://www.osgeo.org/journal/ ] Image: Söderåsen, Sweden, June 24 2006, Dag Endresen.
  • #11: * Alercia A., Diulgheroff S., metz T. (2001). Multicrop Passport Descriptors. FAO, IPGRI. * Frankel O.H. (1984). Genetic perspectives of germplasm conservation. In Arber W., Illmensee K., Peacock W.J., Starlinger P. (eds.): Genetic Manipulation: Impact on Man and Society. Cambridge University Press, for ICSU Press, Cambridge U.K., 161-170. Frankel O.H. (1970): Preface. In Frankel O.H., Bennett E. (eds.): Genetic Resources in Plants – Their Exploration and Conservation. Oxford &amp; Edinburgh, Intrnational Biological Programme &amp; Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1-4. * Mackay , M. C., Von Bothmer R., &amp; Skovmand B. 2005 . Conservation and utilization of genetic resources - what will happen in the future? 5th Triticea Symposium, Prague, Check Republic. * Image Centers of origin, This image is a work of a United States Department of Agriculture employee, taken or made during the course of the person&apos;s official duties. As a work of the U.S. federal government , the image is in the public domain .
  • #12: Image: Wheat spikes, Dag Endresen, 2004-07-20 [ http://www.nordgen.org/sesto/index.php?scp=ngb&amp;thm=pictures&amp;mod=det&amp;id=002855&amp;img_size=768x512 ] Illustration: Distribution of the FIGS core set . Yellow dots represent collection sites - 700 sites, 750 accessions, 52 countries represented. [ http://www.bwldb.net/images/coreset.gif ]
  • #15: We can actually begin to introduce “layers” of information for a range of environmental and geographic parameters. Here we can see precipitation data for collection sites. P
  • #16: Just quickly explain the diagram.
  • #18: These layers of information can be in the form of continuous surfaces of, for example, temperature, humidity, precipitation, salinity problems, and soil types. In this example we are looking at the probability of salinity being a problem based on soil types. This is recent work undertaken by ICARDA scientists, and the collection sites are for bread wheat landraces held by the AWCC. The great thing about GIS technology is that, in this case, we can directly assign a ‘salinity probability index’ on germplasm collected at each individual site. P
  • #19: Here we can compare the two approaches geographically. As I said earlier, this is a work in progress - and we hope to have much more information about the results that the FIGS approach can produce within a few years. But it certainly represents a new way of combining biological and environmental information to benefit PGR utilization and plant improvement.
  • #20: We can then use these layers of information as sieves, through which we can filter our accessions to identify those most likely to contain the genetic variation we are seeking. We can “tune in” the environments from which we want to sample germplasm. For example, we can specify annual precipitation, temperature during heading, humidity at another growth stage - and so on. Then we tip our collection of accessions in the top of the FIGS machine and wait for those that filter out the bottom. These ones we evaluate thoroughly.
  • #21: OK , we have different types of PGR and a range of these are likely to provide the resources we need to breed cultivars in the future. The next question to ask is - Do we have sufficient PGR? Is our coverage of the available genetic variation good enough? Ex situ gene banks were a growth industry in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. Collecting missions were conducted in many parts of the globe, including Vavilov’s centres of diversity, and thousands of landraces and wild relatives were sampled and put into long term storage. But there does not seem to be a collated central register of what was sampled - at the accession level. So, it is still difficult to make definitive statements about how well we have achieved the goal of conserving genetic variation before it is displaced by modern cultivars. One way we can get an idea of how well we have sampled genetic variation is by using GIS, or geographic information system, technology. By mapping the sites where primitive varieties and wild relatives were collected we can quite easily provide an overview of the coverage achieved. It is also possible to include different layers of information, using this technology, to make decisions about collection coverage on an environmental basis as well as geographically. Dr Valkoun also demonstrated the value of GIS in his lecture on wild cereal relatives yesterday. This example shows how several gene banks can collaborate to build a ‘virtual’ primitive varieties (landraces) germplasm distribution map.
  • #22: Text
  • #24: Image: GBIF-MAPA banner (rotated 90°) [http://gbifmapa.austmus.gov.au/mapa/images/ui/home_banner2.png] Illustration: PYXIS grid system [ http://www.gbif.org/images/IMG_B_STORY1137509545 ]
  • #25: The images are from the openModeller web site [ http://openmodeller.sourceforge.net/ ]
  • #26: Image: Barley accession from NGB, EURISCO and SINGER as input to the MaxEnt Niche Modeling algorithm, prediction of occurences, displayed with ArcView (created by Dag Endresen during the GBIF workshop on Niche Modeling, December 2004 in Kansas, US).
  • #27: Image: Rheum x hybridum Murray , 2004, Photographer Gitte K. Björn . [ http://www.nordgen.org/sesto/index.php?scp=ngb&amp;thm=pictures&amp;mod=det&amp;id=003672 ]
  • #28: Dynamic Evaluation Data Analyser [http://www.nordgen.org/sesto/index.php?scp=ngb&amp;thm=observations] Image: Solanum tuberosum L. Potato. Light sprout. Photographer NGB (NGB Picture Archive, image 001289).
  • #30: Dynamic Evaluation Data Analyzer [ http://barley.ipk-gatersleben.de/genres/index.php?scp=barley&amp;thm=matobs&amp;prorecnum=1 ] The original version is developed in SESTO [ http://www.nordgen.org/sesto/index.php?scp=ngb&amp;thm=matobs&amp;ampr=305360601 ]
  • #31: Dynamic Evaluation Data Analyzer. When a trait character is selected the results are displayed split on Site, Year, Taxon, Biological status of sample, Country of origin … or any other useful categories as defined by the responsible administrator. [ http://barley.ipk-gatersleben.de/genres/index.php?scp=barley&amp;thm=matobs&amp;prorecnum=2&amp;dscnum=254&amp;top=&amp;cur_group= ]
  • #32: Photo: Field been from Boreal, accession NGB11518, 2005-03-05, Dag Endresen [http://r142b.ngb.se/ngb/2005-03--the-making-of-seeds-pictures/index.php?offset=19&amp;size=medium&amp;stp=1]
  • #33: Image: Rheum x hybridum Murray Rhubarb (2004). Photographer Gitte K. Björn (NGB Picture Archive, image 003683) Image: Rheum x hybridum Murray Rhubarb (2004). Photographer Gitte K. Björn (NGB Picture Archive, image 003714) Image: Brassica nigra (L.) W. D. J. Koch Black Mustard . Photographer Dag Terje Endresen (NGB Picture Archive, image 003840) [ http://www.nordgen.org/sesto/index.php?scp=ngb&amp;thm=pictures ]
  • #34: * IPGRI Descriptors lists [http://www.ipgri.cgiar.org/system/page.asp?frame=programmes/inibap/home.htm] (119 descriptor lists, 2005) * MCPD [http://www.ipgri.cgiar.org/publications/pdf/333.pdf] * UPOV - International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) [ http://www.upov.int/] * UPOV - The International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants or UPOV (French: Union internationale pour la protection des obtentions végétales) is an intergovernmental organization with headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UPOV] * COMECON - The Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (COMECON / Comecon / CMEA / CEMA), 1949 – 1991, was an economic organisation of communist states and a kind of Eastern European equivalent to the European Economic Community. The military counterpart to the Comecon was the Warsaw Pact. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comecon] * Multi-crop Passport Descriptors (MCPD) [http://www.ipgri.cgiar.org/publications/pdf/124.pdf] F AO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations) - IPGRI (International Plant Genetic Resources Institute). This is a revised version (December 2001) of the 1997 MCPD List. * FAO World Information and Early WarningSystem ( WIEWS) [http://apps3.fao.org/wiews/] * 19 Plant Uses Categories based on categories developed for the Working Group on Taxonomic Databases (TDWG) (Cook, Frances E.M., 1995. Economic Botany: Data Collection Standard. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew). [ http://www.ecpgr.cgiar.org/epgris/Training/MCPD-1998.doc] * The mapping of MCPD to ABCD was started in 2004 by Helmut Knüpffer and Walter Berendsohn, and continued by Javier de la Torre and Dag Terje Filip Endresen in 2005. [ http://ww3.bgbm.org/MCDPH] [ http://www.bgbm.org/TDWG/CODATA/Schema/Mappings/EURISCO-2-ABCD.pdf ]
  • #35: * Illustration: Corn earworm pupae that will be used to produce control parasites for release in the field. Photo by Scott Bauer. [http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/graphics/photos/k5554-2.htm] * UBIF is an attempt to define a common foundation for several TDWG/GBIF standards like SDD (see SDD WIKI), ABCD (see ABCD content schema homepage) or TaxonConceptNames (see Taxonomic Concept Transfer Schema WIKI). * Unified Biosciences Information Frameword (UBIF) XML schema for data exchange and integration across knowledge domains. The schema has been design for biological data, but is applicable to other knowledge areas as well. It is based on work of the TDWG SDD and ABCD subgroups and currently jointly authored by the SDD, ABCD, TaxonName subgroups and by GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility). The framework may be used without changes for new schemata, no registration is necessary. * Complex Types are part of the UBIF infrastructure (TDWG common complex type for several schemas, ABCD, SDD, TCS, Lnnean Core, etc.)
  • #36: * The mapping of MCPD to ABCD was started in 2004 by Helmut Knüpffer and Walter Berendsohn, and continued by Javier de la Torre and Dag Terje Filip Endresen in 2005. [ http://ww3.bgbm.org/MCDPH] [ http://www. bgbm .org/TDWG/CODATA/Schema/Mappings/EURISCO-2-ABCD. pdf ]
  • #37: GCP_Passport v 1.03 [http://tor.ngb.se/dev/temp/gcp_passport_01_03.xsd] The GCP Passport 1.03 descriptor standard is based on the MCPD and ABCD standards and implemented for the PyWrapper/BioCASE data exchange software. A mapping for automatic “upgrade” between ABCD 2.06 and GCP_Passport_1.03 is also included in the PyWrapper/BioCASE software. The Generation Challenge Programme is a research and capacity building network that uses plant genetic diversity, advanced genomic science, and comparative biology to develop tools and technologies that enable plant breeders in the developing world to produce better crop varieties for resource-poor farmers. [http://www.generationcp.org]
  • #39: OMG-LSR, Object Management Group – Life Science Research [http://www.omg.org/lsr/]
  • #42: http://apps3.fao.org/wiews/wiews.jsp
  • #43: Solanum tuberosum L. Potato. Light sprout. Photographer NGB (NGB Picture Archive, image 001289).
  • #44: Image: Field of wheat at Alnarp. Photographer Dag Terje Endresen (NGB Picture Archive, image 002981) Image: Spider in a spiderweb Image: Dag Terje Filip Endresen in Benin Image: Michael Mackay Michael Mackay: &lt; michael.mackay@agric.nsw.gov.au&gt;