4182017 Assignment Print Viewhttpezto.mheducation.com.docx
- 1. 4/18/2017 Assignment Print View http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 1/5 1. Award: 10 out of 10.00 points Score: 10/10 Points 100 % Self-Assessment 8.3: Evaluate (Your) Team Member Effectiven ess To assess your own team member effectiveness, complete the as sessment answering each item in terms of the extent you agree t hat you do each. Calculate your overall team effectiveness score and compa re it to the norms listed below to gauge your general team memb er effectiveness. Next, calculate the subtotal for each competency and compare y our subtotals to the arbitrary norms listed below to assess your effectiveness on each competency. Then, to determine which co mpetencies are the strongest and weakest for you, calculate your average for each and compare them. The averages are computed by takin g the subtotal for each and dividing it by the number of items fo r that competency. This will show you the relative strength of your tea m competencies.
- 2. Improve the value of this measure further still by evaluating yo urself in terms of your effectiveness in a particular team (school , work, or other organization). Then, have a member of that same team eva luate you. Compare your scores with those given by your teamm ate, identify the consistent scores and those that differ, and use this feedback to improve your own team member effectiveness. St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee Di sa gr ee So m ew ha t A gr ee Ag re
- 3. e St ro ng ly Ag re e N/ A - N ot A pp lic ab le. .. * 1. Did a fair share of the team's work. * 2. Fulfilled responsibilities to the team. * 3. Completed work in a timely manner. * 4. Came to team meetings prepared. * 5. Did work that was complete and accurate. * 6. Communicated effectively. * 7. Exchanged information with teammates in a timely manner. * 8. Provided encouragement to other team members.
- 4. * 9. Accepted feedback about strengths and weaknesses from teammates. * 10. Used teammates' feedback to improve performance. * 11. Let other team members help when it was necessary. * 12. Stayed aware of fellow team members' progress. * 13. Assessed whether the team was making progress as expected. * 14. Provided constructive feedback to others on the team. * 15. Made sure that everyone on the team understood important 4/18/2017 Assignment Print View http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 2/5 Contributing to the Team’s Work 0 - 10 pts. Feedback: Low contribution Interacting with Teammates 0 - 12 pts. Feedback: Low level of interaction Keeping the Team on Track 0 - 10 pts. Feedback: Not very skilled at keeping on track Expecting Quality
- 5. 0 - 6 pts. Feedback: Low quality expectations Having Relevant Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs) 5 - 7 pts. Feedback: Moderately relevant knowledge and skills 0 - 42 pts. Feedback: Less effective team member Source: Adapted from M. W. Ohland, M. L. Loughry, D. J. Woe hr, L. G. Bullard, R. M. Felder, C. J. Finelli, R. A. Layton, H. R . Pomeranz, and D. G. Schmucker, “The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectivenes s: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Se lf- and Peer Evaluation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2012, pp. 609–630. Score : 7 pts. Score : 9 pts. Score : 8 pts. Score : 5 pts. Score : 5 pts. Feedback score: Score : 34 pts. Range-based Feedback: * 15. Made sure that everyone on the team understood important information. * 16. Helped the team to plan and organize its work.
- 6. * 17. Expected the team to succeed. * 18. Believed that the team should achieve high standards. * 19. Cared that the team produced high-quality work. * 20. Had the skills and abilities that were necessary to do a good job. * 21. Had enough knowledge of teammates’ jobs to be able to fill in if necessary. rev: 03_16_2016_QC_CS-44758 Self-Assessment 8.3: Evaluate (Your) Team Member Effectiven ess To assess your own team member effectiveness, complete the as sessment answering each item in terms of the extent you agree t hat you do each. Calculate your overall team effectiveness score and compa re it to the norms listed below to gauge your general team memb er effectiveness. Next, calculate the subtotal for each competency and compare y our subtotals to the arbitrary norms listed below to assess your effectiveness on each competency. Then, to determine which co mpetencies are the strongest and weakest for you, calculate your average for each and compare them. The averages are computed by takin g the subtotal for each and dividing it by the number of items fo r that competency. This will show you the relative strength of your tea
- 7. m competencies. Improve the value of this measure further still by evaluating yo urself in terms of your effectiveness in a particular team (school , work, or other organization). Then, have a member of that same team eva luate you. Compare your scores with those given by your teamm ate, identify the consistent scores and those that differ, and use this feedback to improve your own team member effectiveness. St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s. Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s. So m ew
- 8. ha t A gr ee | 3 pt s. Ag re e | 4 pt s. St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5 pt s. 4/18/2017 Assignment Print View http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 3/5 Contributing to the Team’s Work Interacting with Teammates
- 9. Keeping the Team on Track This question accepts all answers. St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s. Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s. So m ew ha t A gr ee | 3
- 10. pt s. Ag re e | 4 pt s. St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5 pt s. N/ A - N ot A pp lic ab le. .. | 0 pt s. * 1. Did a fair share of the team's work. (1wt.)
- 11. * 2. Fulfilled responsibilities to the team. (1wt.) * 3. Completed work in a timely manner. (1wt.) * 4. Came to team meetings prepared. (1wt.) * 5. Did work that was complete and accurate. (1wt.) St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s. Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s. So m ew ha t A
- 12. gr ee | 3 pt s. Ag re e | 4 pt s. St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5 pt s. N/ A - N ot A pp lic ab le. .. | 0
- 13. pt s. * 6. Communicated effectively. (1wt.) * 7. Exchanged information with teammates in a timely manner. (1wt.) * 8. Provided encouragement to other team members. (1wt.) * 9. Accepted feedback about strengths and weaknesses from teammates. (1wt.) * 10. Used teammates' feedback to improve performance. (1wt.) * 11. Let other team members help when it was necessary. (1wt.) St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s. Di sa gr ee
- 14. | 2 pt s. So m ew ha t A gr ee | 3 pt s. Ag re e | 4 pt s. St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5 pt s. N/ A
- 15. - N ot A pp lic ab le. .. | 0 pt s. * 12. Stayed aware of fellow team members' progress. (1wt.) * 13. Assessed whether the team was making progress as expected. (1wt.) * 14. Provided constructive feedback to others on the team. (1wt.) * 15. Made sure that everyone on the team understood important information. (1wt.) St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s.
- 16. Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s. So m ew ha t A gr ee | 3 pt s. Ag re e | 4 pt s. St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5
- 17. pt s. N/ A - N ot A pp lic ab le. .. | 0 pt s. 4/18/2017 Assignment Print View http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 4/5 Expecting Quality Having Relevant Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs) Feedback: Contributing to the Team’s Work 20 - 25 pts. 11 - 19 pts. 0 - 10 pts.
- 18. Interacting with Teammates 24 - 30 pts. 13 - 23 pts. 0 - 12 pts. Keeping the Team on Track 20 - 25 pts. 11 - 19 pts. 0 - 10 pts. St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s. Di sa gr ee | 2 pt
- 19. s. So m ew ha t A gr ee Ag re e | 4 pt s. St ro ng ly Ag re e N/ A - N ot A pp lic ab le. ..
- 20. * 16. Helped the team to plan and organize its work. (1wt.) St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s. Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s. So m ew ha t A gr ee | 3 pt s.
- 21. Ag re e | 4 pt s. St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5 pt s. N/ A - N ot A pp lic ab le. .. | 0 pt s. * 17. Expected the team to succeed. (1wt.) * 18. Believed that the team should achieve high standards.
- 22. (1wt.) * 19. Cared that the team produced high-quality work. (1wt.) St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s. Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s. So m ew ha t A gr ee | 3 pt
- 23. s. Ag re e | 4 pt s. St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5 pt s. N/ A - N ot A pp lic ab le. .. | 0 pt s. * 20. Had the skills and abilities that were necessary to do a good job. (1wt.)
- 24. * 21. Had enough knowledge of teammates’ jobs to be able to fill in if necessary. (1wt.) FEEDBACK: High contribution FEEDBACK: Moderate contribution FEEDBACK: Low contribution FEEDBACK: High level of interaction FEEDBACK: Moderate level of interaction FEEDBACK: Low level of interaction FEEDBACK: Highly skilled at keeping on track FEEDBACK: Moderately skilled at keeping on track
- 25. FEEDBACK: Not very skilled at keeping on track 4/18/2017 Assignment Print View http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 5/5 Expecting Quality 12 - 15 pts. 7 - 11 pts. 0 - 6 pts. Having Relevant Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs) 8 - 10 pts. 5 - 7 pts. 0 - 4 pts. Range-based feedback: 0 - 42 pts. 43 - 83 pts. 84 - 105 pts. Source: Adapted from M. W. Ohland, M. L. Loughry, D. J. Woe hr, L. G. Bullard, R. M. Felder, C. J. Finelli, R. A. Layton, H. R
- 26. . Pomeranz, and D. G. Schmucker, “The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectivenes s: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Se lf- and Peer Evaluation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2012, pp. 609–630. FEEDBACK: High quality expectations FEEDBACK: Moderate quality expectations FEEDBACK: Low quality expectations FEEDBACK: Highly relevant knowledge and skills FEEDBACK: Moderately relevant knowledge and skills FEEDBACK: Not particularly relevant knowledge and skills FEEDBACK: Less effective team member FEEDBACK:
- 27. Moderately effective team member FEEDBACK: Highly effective team member rev: 03_16_2016_QC_CS-44758