FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Lecture# 6
Civil Engg. Dept. - PTUT Lahore
Email: shahidameen682@gmail.com
Bearing Capacity of
Shallow
Foundation
In situ Tests
Several in-situ tests define the stratigraphy
and obtain direct measurements of soil
properties and geotechnical parameters.
The common tests include:
Standard penetration test (SPT)
Cone penetration test(CPT)
Vane shear test(VST)
Borehole Shear Test (BST)
Piezocone test (CPTu)
Flat dilatometer test (DMT)
Pressuremeter test (PMT)
Plate Load test (PLT)
6._Bearing Capacity tests.pptx shallow f
Standard Penetration Test, SPT
SPT is the most widely used test procedure to
determine the properties of in-situ soils
63.5 kg
Drill rod
0.15 m
0.15 m
0.15 m
Number of blows = N1
Number of blows =
N2 Number of blows =
N3
Standard penetration resistance (SPT N) = N2 + N3
Number of blows for the first 150 mm
penetration is disregarded due to the
disturbance likely to exist at the bottom
of the drill hole
The test can be conducted at every 1
0.76 m vertical intervals
Various correlations have been developed to determine soilm
strength parameters (c,  q) from N
Standard Penetration Test, SPT
SPT (Manual operation)
Standard Penetration Test
(SPT)
 140 lb (63.5 kg) Hammer
 30in (76 cm) free fall
 Drive sampler over 18 inches
 Record no. of blows per each 6 inch
penetration
 SPT blow count=blows for 2nd 6 inch
penetration + blows for 3rd 6inch penetration
Standard Split Spoon Sampler
(SPT)
 Thick wall (0.25in) cylinder
 Sampling tube is split along the length
 Hammered into the ground
Standard Split
Spoon
Sampler
Standard
Penetration Test
(SPT)
Types of SPT Hammers
SPT
: Automatic Trip
Hammer
6._Bearing Capacity tests.pptx shallow f
6._Bearing Capacity tests.pptx shallow f
6._Bearing Capacity tests.pptx shallow f
6._Bearing Capacity tests.pptx shallow f
6._Bearing Capacity tests.pptx shallow f
6._Bearing Capacity tests.pptx shallow f
1. Points to note
If number of blows for blows for 150 mm
drive exceeds 50, it is taken as refusal and
the test is discontinued
Standardization of
SPT
The validity of the SPT has been the
subject of study and research by many
authors for the last many years.
The basic conclusion is that the
best results are difficult to
reproduce.
Some of the important factors that
affect reproducibility are:
Variation in the height of fall of the drop
weight (hammer) during the test
The number of turns of rope around the
cathead, and the condition of the manila
rope
Length and diameter of drill rod
Diameter of bore hole
Overburden pressure
Corrections to SPTBlow
Counts
Factors affecting SPT blow count:
 Hammer Efficiency
 Borehole diameter
 Type of sampler
 Rod length
qu for cohesionless soil from SPT
After knowing value of angle of internal
friction, use bearing capacity equation
Peck et al. 1974
is a proportionality factor. Bowles (1996)
suggested the value of 12 for this
Peck et al. 1974
qu for cohesive soil from SPT
After knowing value of qu (Unconfined
compressive strength), use Skempton Equation.
qnu
 CNc
 qu 
Df
Skempton’s Bearing Capacity Factor NC
Skempton (1951) for Saturated clay soils and strip
foundations suggested
qu  CNc  Df
C is half of unconfined compressive strength
(Recall unconfined compression test)
Notes on SPT
The standard penetration test (SPT) is
performed during the advancement of a soil
boring to obtain an approximate measure
of the dynamic soil resistance, as well as a
disturbed drive sample (split barrel type).
The test was introduced by the Raymond Pile
Company in 1902 and remains today as the
most common in-situ test worldwide.
The procedures for the SPT are detailed in
ASTM D 1586 and AASHTO T-206.
The SPT involves the driving of a hollow thick-
walled tube into the ground and measuring the
number of blows to advance the split-barrel
sampler a vertical distance of 300 mm (1 foot).
A drop weight system is used for the pounding
where a 63.5-kg (140-lb) hammer repeatedly
falls from 0.76 m (30 inches) to achieve three
successive increments of 150-mm (6-inches)
each.
The first increment is recorded as a seating,
while the number of blows to advance the
second and third increments are summed to
give the N-value ("blow count") or SPT-
resistance (reported in blows/0.3 m or blows
per foot).
If the sampler cannot be driven 450 mm, the
number of blows per each 150-mm
increment and per each partial increment is
recorded on the boring log.
For partial increments, the depth of
penetration is recorded in addition to the
number of blows.
The test can be performed in a wide variety of
soil types, as well as weak rocks, yet is not
particularly useful in the characterization of
gravel deposits nor soft clays.
The fact that the test provides both a sample
and a number is useful, yet problematic, as
one cannot do two things well at the same
time.
The SPT is conducted at the bottom of a soil
boring that has been prepared using either
flight augers or rotary wash drilling methods.
At regular depth intervals, the drilling process
is interrupted to perform the SPT.
Generally, tests are taken every 0.76 m (2.5
feet) at depths shallower than 3 meters (10
feet) and at intervals of 1.5 m (5.0 feet)
thereafter.
The head of water in the borehole must be
maintained at or above the ambient
groundwater level to avoid inflow of water
and borehole instability.
In current U.S. practice, three types of drop
hammers (donut, safety, and automatic) and four
types of drill rods (N, NW, A, and AW) are used in
the conduct of the SPT. The test in fact is highly-
dependent upon the equipment used and
operator performing the test. Most important
factor is the energy efficiency of the system.
The theoretical energy of a free-fall system
with the specified mass and drop height is 48
kg-m (350 ft-lb), but the actual energy is less
due to frictional losses and eccentric loading.
A rotating cathead and rope system is
commonly used, and their efficiency depends
on numerous factors including type of
hammer, number of rope turns, conditions of
the
sheaves and rotating cathead (e.g., lubricated,
rusted, bent, new, old), age of the rope, actual
drop height, vertical plumbness, weather and
moisture conditions (e.g., wet, dry, freezing),
and other variables.
Trends in recent times are towards the use of
automated systems for lifting and dropping the
mass in order to minimize these factors.
Cone Penetration Test
Cone Penetration Test (CPT)
(ASTM D 3441 and D 5778: )
Originally Developed in Netherlands
1930s Further developments in 1950s
“Dutch Cone”
Types of CPT devices
–mechanical cone
–electric cone
–piezocone
Cones
60 degree apex
cone
Standard
cone φ =
35.7 mm
Area = 10
cm2
Measures:
Tip resistance (qc)
Sleeve friction
(fs) Pore pressure
(pw)
Shear wave
Cone Penetrometer (CPT)
6._Bearing Capacity tests.pptx shallow f
CPT Truck
Crawler Type CPT Truck
CPT Truck; Interior
Mechanical Cone
Penetration Test.
The idea for the mechanical cone penetration
test is similar to the SPT except that instead of
driving a thick-walled sampler into the soil, a
steel cone is pushed into the soil.
The most common type of mechanical
penetrometer is the Dutch mantle cone,
This test is often referred to as the Dutch cone
test or the cone penetration test
MECHANICAL CONE
PENETROMETER
The cone is first pushed into the soil to the
desired depth (initial position) and then
force is applied to the inner rod, which
moves the cone downward into the
extended position.
The cone is pushed into the soil at a rate
of about 2 to 4 ft/min (10 to 20 mm/sec).
6._Bearing Capacity tests.pptx shallow f
Static Cone
Penetrometer
test
penetrometers
Cone
with pore water
pressure measurement
capability are known
as piezocones
40 mm
40 mm
40 mm
40 mm
6._Bearing Capacity tests.pptx shallow f
6._Bearing Capacity tests.pptx shallow f
Cone 60o
Base Area10cm2
For obtaining cone resistance, the cone is pushed down at a
steady rate of 10 mm/sec through a depth of 40 mm each time
Area of Sleeves: 150cm2

More Related Content

PDF
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation SPT
PDF
Geotechnical testign methods ii as
PDF
م.36-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.محمد حسنين ربيع - إستكشاف التربة بالطرق المتقدمة
PDF
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
PPTX
Soil Bearing Capacity of soil and foundationSBC.pptx
PDF
INSITU TESTING Foundation Engineering Lecture Notes
PPTX
SPT and VST- By Daanyal Umar.pptx
PPTX
Presentation on standard penertation test
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation SPT
Geotechnical testign methods ii as
م.36-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.محمد حسنين ربيع - إستكشاف التربة بالطرق المتقدمة
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Soil Bearing Capacity of soil and foundationSBC.pptx
INSITU TESTING Foundation Engineering Lecture Notes
SPT and VST- By Daanyal Umar.pptx
Presentation on standard penertation test

Similar to 6._Bearing Capacity tests.pptx shallow f (20)

PPTX
CVEN 440_540 Classnotes (6) --- Static analysis of pile foundation.pptx
PPT
Applications of Vane Shear Test in Geotechnical soil investigations
PPTX
Site investigation
PDF
SPT Field Test.pdf
PPT
lecture_Exploration.ppt shear strength ppt soil mechanics and ppts
PPTX
cone Penetration test
PPTX
Standard penetration test (spt)
PPTX
Pile Integrity Test by mudasir beigh.pptx
PPTX
Subsurface Exploration Methods in Geotechnical Engineering
PDF
soil exploration in geotechnical engineering.pdf
PDF
CHAPTER 2 - SITE INVESTIGATION OF SOIL
PPTX
GI MOD 3.pptx
PPTX
Site inveswtigation vandana miss
PPT
10570216.ppt
PPT
74CD7287-9848-426D-966F-ADE2BF37611C.ppt
PPTX
FIELD TEST FOR BEARING CAPACITY-revised for BC.pptx
PDF
Unisoft software bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
PPTX
Standard Penetration Test for soils
PPTX
Cone Penetration Testmade by hassan iraq.pptx
CVEN 440_540 Classnotes (6) --- Static analysis of pile foundation.pptx
Applications of Vane Shear Test in Geotechnical soil investigations
Site investigation
SPT Field Test.pdf
lecture_Exploration.ppt shear strength ppt soil mechanics and ppts
cone Penetration test
Standard penetration test (spt)
Pile Integrity Test by mudasir beigh.pptx
Subsurface Exploration Methods in Geotechnical Engineering
soil exploration in geotechnical engineering.pdf
CHAPTER 2 - SITE INVESTIGATION OF SOIL
GI MOD 3.pptx
Site inveswtigation vandana miss
10570216.ppt
74CD7287-9848-426D-966F-ADE2BF37611C.ppt
FIELD TEST FOR BEARING CAPACITY-revised for BC.pptx
Unisoft software bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
Standard Penetration Test for soils
Cone Penetration Testmade by hassan iraq.pptx
Ad

More from ShahidAmeen10 (7)

PPTX
Slope Stability lecture 1 Lecture-1.pptx
PPTX
3._Foundation_Design_Requireme 11nts.pptx
PDF
2._Types_of_Foundations.pdf shallow foundation
PDF
L19.pdf advance geotechnical engineering
PPTX
Foundation Engineering Lecture 1 Introduction.pptx
PPTX
Lecture 5. Mixing water for Concrete ppt
PPTX
MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTH WALLS AND REINFORCED SOIL SLOPES (1).pptx
Slope Stability lecture 1 Lecture-1.pptx
3._Foundation_Design_Requireme 11nts.pptx
2._Types_of_Foundations.pdf shallow foundation
L19.pdf advance geotechnical engineering
Foundation Engineering Lecture 1 Introduction.pptx
Lecture 5. Mixing water for Concrete ppt
MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTH WALLS AND REINFORCED SOIL SLOPES (1).pptx
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Unit1 - AIML Chapter 1 concept and ethics
PDF
Design of Material Handling Equipment Lecture Note
PDF
20250617 - IR - Global Guide for HR - 51 pages.pdf
PPTX
ai_satellite_crop_management_20250815030350.pptx
PDF
Accra-Kumasi Expressway - Prefeasibility Report Volume 1 of 7.11.2018.pdf
PPTX
wireless networks, mobile computing.pptx
PPTX
Graph Data Structures with Types, Traversals, Connectivity, and Real-Life App...
PPTX
Measurement Uncertainty and Measurement System analysis
PPTX
Amdahl’s law is explained in the above power point presentations
PPTX
Module 8- Technological and Communication Skills.pptx
PDF
Soil Improvement Techniques Note - Rabbi
PDF
Applications of Equal_Area_Criterion.pdf
PDF
Prof. Dr. KAYIHURA A. SILAS MUNYANEZA, PhD..pdf
PDF
Computer System Architecture 3rd Edition-M Morris Mano.pdf
PDF
UEFA_Embodied_Carbon_Emissions_Football_Infrastructure.pdf
PPT
Chapter 1 - Introduction to Manufacturing Technology_2.ppt
PPTX
CyberSecurity Mobile and Wireless Devices
PDF
August -2025_Top10 Read_Articles_ijait.pdf
PPTX
CONTRACTS IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS: TYPES
PPTX
Management Information system : MIS-e-Business Systems.pptx
Unit1 - AIML Chapter 1 concept and ethics
Design of Material Handling Equipment Lecture Note
20250617 - IR - Global Guide for HR - 51 pages.pdf
ai_satellite_crop_management_20250815030350.pptx
Accra-Kumasi Expressway - Prefeasibility Report Volume 1 of 7.11.2018.pdf
wireless networks, mobile computing.pptx
Graph Data Structures with Types, Traversals, Connectivity, and Real-Life App...
Measurement Uncertainty and Measurement System analysis
Amdahl’s law is explained in the above power point presentations
Module 8- Technological and Communication Skills.pptx
Soil Improvement Techniques Note - Rabbi
Applications of Equal_Area_Criterion.pdf
Prof. Dr. KAYIHURA A. SILAS MUNYANEZA, PhD..pdf
Computer System Architecture 3rd Edition-M Morris Mano.pdf
UEFA_Embodied_Carbon_Emissions_Football_Infrastructure.pdf
Chapter 1 - Introduction to Manufacturing Technology_2.ppt
CyberSecurity Mobile and Wireless Devices
August -2025_Top10 Read_Articles_ijait.pdf
CONTRACTS IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS: TYPES
Management Information system : MIS-e-Business Systems.pptx

6._Bearing Capacity tests.pptx shallow f

  • 1. FOUNDATION ENGINEERING Lecture# 6 Civil Engg. Dept. - PTUT Lahore Email: shahidameen682@gmail.com
  • 4. Several in-situ tests define the stratigraphy and obtain direct measurements of soil properties and geotechnical parameters. The common tests include: Standard penetration test (SPT) Cone penetration test(CPT) Vane shear test(VST) Borehole Shear Test (BST) Piezocone test (CPTu) Flat dilatometer test (DMT) Pressuremeter test (PMT) Plate Load test (PLT)
  • 6. Standard Penetration Test, SPT SPT is the most widely used test procedure to determine the properties of in-situ soils 63.5 kg Drill rod 0.15 m 0.15 m 0.15 m Number of blows = N1 Number of blows = N2 Number of blows = N3 Standard penetration resistance (SPT N) = N2 + N3 Number of blows for the first 150 mm penetration is disregarded due to the disturbance likely to exist at the bottom of the drill hole The test can be conducted at every 1 0.76 m vertical intervals Various correlations have been developed to determine soilm strength parameters (c,  q) from N
  • 7. Standard Penetration Test, SPT SPT (Manual operation)
  • 8. Standard Penetration Test (SPT)  140 lb (63.5 kg) Hammer  30in (76 cm) free fall  Drive sampler over 18 inches  Record no. of blows per each 6 inch penetration  SPT blow count=blows for 2nd 6 inch penetration + blows for 3rd 6inch penetration
  • 9. Standard Split Spoon Sampler (SPT)  Thick wall (0.25in) cylinder  Sampling tube is split along the length  Hammered into the ground
  • 12. Types of SPT Hammers
  • 20. 1. Points to note If number of blows for blows for 150 mm drive exceeds 50, it is taken as refusal and the test is discontinued
  • 21. Standardization of SPT The validity of the SPT has been the subject of study and research by many authors for the last many years. The basic conclusion is that the best results are difficult to reproduce. Some of the important factors that affect reproducibility are:
  • 22. Variation in the height of fall of the drop weight (hammer) during the test The number of turns of rope around the cathead, and the condition of the manila rope Length and diameter of drill rod Diameter of bore hole Overburden pressure
  • 23. Corrections to SPTBlow Counts Factors affecting SPT blow count:  Hammer Efficiency  Borehole diameter  Type of sampler  Rod length
  • 24. qu for cohesionless soil from SPT After knowing value of angle of internal friction, use bearing capacity equation
  • 25. Peck et al. 1974
  • 26. is a proportionality factor. Bowles (1996) suggested the value of 12 for this Peck et al. 1974
  • 27. qu for cohesive soil from SPT After knowing value of qu (Unconfined compressive strength), use Skempton Equation.
  • 28. qnu  CNc  qu  Df Skempton’s Bearing Capacity Factor NC Skempton (1951) for Saturated clay soils and strip foundations suggested qu  CNc  Df C is half of unconfined compressive strength (Recall unconfined compression test)
  • 29. Notes on SPT The standard penetration test (SPT) is performed during the advancement of a soil boring to obtain an approximate measure of the dynamic soil resistance, as well as a disturbed drive sample (split barrel type). The test was introduced by the Raymond Pile Company in 1902 and remains today as the most common in-situ test worldwide. The procedures for the SPT are detailed in ASTM D 1586 and AASHTO T-206.
  • 30. The SPT involves the driving of a hollow thick- walled tube into the ground and measuring the number of blows to advance the split-barrel sampler a vertical distance of 300 mm (1 foot). A drop weight system is used for the pounding where a 63.5-kg (140-lb) hammer repeatedly falls from 0.76 m (30 inches) to achieve three successive increments of 150-mm (6-inches) each.
  • 31. The first increment is recorded as a seating, while the number of blows to advance the second and third increments are summed to give the N-value ("blow count") or SPT- resistance (reported in blows/0.3 m or blows per foot). If the sampler cannot be driven 450 mm, the number of blows per each 150-mm increment and per each partial increment is recorded on the boring log.
  • 32. For partial increments, the depth of penetration is recorded in addition to the number of blows. The test can be performed in a wide variety of soil types, as well as weak rocks, yet is not particularly useful in the characterization of gravel deposits nor soft clays. The fact that the test provides both a sample and a number is useful, yet problematic, as one cannot do two things well at the same time.
  • 33. The SPT is conducted at the bottom of a soil boring that has been prepared using either flight augers or rotary wash drilling methods. At regular depth intervals, the drilling process is interrupted to perform the SPT. Generally, tests are taken every 0.76 m (2.5 feet) at depths shallower than 3 meters (10 feet) and at intervals of 1.5 m (5.0 feet) thereafter.
  • 34. The head of water in the borehole must be maintained at or above the ambient groundwater level to avoid inflow of water and borehole instability. In current U.S. practice, three types of drop hammers (donut, safety, and automatic) and four types of drill rods (N, NW, A, and AW) are used in the conduct of the SPT. The test in fact is highly- dependent upon the equipment used and operator performing the test. Most important factor is the energy efficiency of the system.
  • 35. The theoretical energy of a free-fall system with the specified mass and drop height is 48 kg-m (350 ft-lb), but the actual energy is less due to frictional losses and eccentric loading. A rotating cathead and rope system is commonly used, and their efficiency depends on numerous factors including type of hammer, number of rope turns, conditions of the
  • 36. sheaves and rotating cathead (e.g., lubricated, rusted, bent, new, old), age of the rope, actual drop height, vertical plumbness, weather and moisture conditions (e.g., wet, dry, freezing), and other variables. Trends in recent times are towards the use of automated systems for lifting and dropping the mass in order to minimize these factors.
  • 38. Cone Penetration Test (CPT) (ASTM D 3441 and D 5778: ) Originally Developed in Netherlands 1930s Further developments in 1950s “Dutch Cone” Types of CPT devices –mechanical cone –electric cone –piezocone
  • 39. Cones 60 degree apex cone Standard cone φ = 35.7 mm Area = 10 cm2 Measures: Tip resistance (qc) Sleeve friction (fs) Pore pressure (pw) Shear wave
  • 45. Mechanical Cone Penetration Test. The idea for the mechanical cone penetration test is similar to the SPT except that instead of driving a thick-walled sampler into the soil, a steel cone is pushed into the soil. The most common type of mechanical penetrometer is the Dutch mantle cone, This test is often referred to as the Dutch cone test or the cone penetration test
  • 47. The cone is first pushed into the soil to the desired depth (initial position) and then force is applied to the inner rod, which moves the cone downward into the extended position. The cone is pushed into the soil at a rate of about 2 to 4 ft/min (10 to 20 mm/sec).
  • 49. Static Cone Penetrometer test penetrometers Cone with pore water pressure measurement capability are known as piezocones 40 mm 40 mm 40 mm 40 mm
  • 52. Cone 60o Base Area10cm2 For obtaining cone resistance, the cone is pushed down at a steady rate of 10 mm/sec through a depth of 40 mm each time Area of Sleeves: 150cm2