6. Process: ocp cfops capacity mgmt and optimization
- 1. Coromatic Academy Open Compute Project, Critical Facilities Operations Framework Process: Capacity Management & Optimization Rev 2020-08-03 Information classification: Public
- 2. Contents • Process overview • Lessons learned / customer experiences • Final notes
- 3. CAPACITY MGMT & OPTIMIZATION OCP Critical Facilities Operations Framework
- 4. Site Operations Integration Terms & Conditions OCP CFOPS Delivery model Incidents Work Orders & Projects On-site Access Service Levels Organization KPI Monitoring & Reporting Lifecycle & Financial Mgmt On-site services Security & Access Maintenance In / outdoor FM Site assistance Site Inspection Audits and Compliance Site Management Delivery Support Service Level Mgmt Lifecycle & Financial Mgmt WO & Project Mgmt Monitoring & Reporting Governance and BCP Advisory and Benchmarking Supply Chain and Sourcing Service Desk 24/7 Incident Mgmt Team & Suppliers Capacity Mgmt & Optimization Document Mgmt Compliance Mgmt Service Improvements Asset List Border List Customer Managed Operating Center Source: OCP CFOPS 2019 v1.4
- 5. Capacity Management and Optimization MindMap Overview Process Summary Capacity management and optimization aims to secure optimal usage and reliability of the site’s provisioned capacity and performance. Therefore, it should analyze, manage and plan: • Availability • Resource and Energy • Risk • Quality There is a strong relation between the level of redundancy, the provisioned and the used capacity. Overloading the provisioned capacity leads to a loss of redundancy. This increases risks of failure, but not necessarily to an actual failure. To reduce resource and energy consumption, especially under part load conditions, only enough site systems should be installed to provide sufficient capacity for a pre-agreed future period, e.g. 18 months. Additional site systems or services to bring the site to increased capacity, to mitigate risks or quality issues should be put in place in time to meet the forecasted requirements. Source: OCP CFOPS 2019 v1.4
- 6. Lessons learned / Customer experiences “A System Optimization Assessment was performed at a customer site. It concluded that the energy use for keeping temperatures low in the Primary Area was too high. The suggested solution consisted of constructing a partition wall to make the Primary Area smaller (and thus less space to cool) and to adjust the Site Configuration Procedure (SCP) for the site system accordingly. After a Service Request was created, executed and approved, the savings were measurable eight weeks later…”
- 7. Final notes • The process relies on reporting from the Process “Monitoring & Reporting” and follows the same site system categories • Optimization should follow Plan-Do-Study-Act • It should not be confused with on-site Services, e.g. projects to improve performance
Editor's Notes
- #10: Clear market leader in turnkey data centers and other critical facilities Highly skilled and experienced workforce operating out of 20 locations Unrivalled experience as a full-service provider of turnkey critical facilities solutions Proven international delivery capabilities Strong Nordic customer base across a wide range of industries