SlideShare a Scribd company logo
FMP
EVALUATION
RESEARCH
 I think my strengths of my research was analysing the
different front covers and double page spread I managed to
pick out all of the different conventions of a magazine and
double page spread. I then was able to add all of these
common conventions into my own front cover and double
page spread, this really helped me think about what I was
going to add in to my own work.
 I think the weakness of my research was been able to fill in
and collect information for my audience profile, this is a key
part to the research as you need to know who you want your
audience to be for you to decide on colour schemes, plug,
buzzwords, masthead etc.
PLANNING
 My strengths of my planning will be drawing and drafting my two
layouts by doing this it helped me plan out how I wanted my front
cover and double page spread to look by including all of the
conventions that I found out in my research. This then helped my
when it cam to making my final product as I already have an idea of
how I wanted it to look, I changed a few this like the way some of the
text was placed but I still included a lot of what I have drafted.
 My weaknesses of planning would be making my schedule for the
next 8 days of production, as I had no idea what was going to
happen when my work corrupted so I went of schedule a little bit but
I managed to get all of my work done I just didn’t have time to go
extra pages for my magazine. Also filling in the contingency planning
and props & locations as it is very hard to think of every potential
issue that could happen and think of how you can resolve the
problem if something does happen I also forgot to add things in so I
had to back and make sure that they was all full and all correct.
TIME MANAGEMENT
 I think I managed my time well and I managed to get
everything in on time, I don’t think I would as I lost my
Photoshop files so I had to re-do them again but I managed to
get it all in on time and get the magazine front cover and
double page spread finished. From getting a head of research
and planning I was able to do the Photoshop files if I was
behind I don’t think I would have managed to get them in on
time.
TECHNICAL QUALITIES
Similarities
They isn’t much that is the same between my magazine and the
existing product but the main headline are in the same place across
the image this is telling use who the main headline is about and who it
is as they is an image of the, the way that its placed on the models is
like they are telling the audience themselves what they are going to
be talking about. They have also got the issue number in the same
place, this is easy for the audience to see but small enough so I
doesn’t takeover.
Differences
They is a lot of differences in these two magazines and that’s not a bad
thing because every magazine needs to me original and if every
magazine was the same then everyone would get bored of seeing the
same lay out etc. They expect to see something new when buying a
magazine even if it’s the smallest thing.
For example my magazine has a barcode, price, plug and more I have
a lot of cover lines, give a ways and my image is small but big enough
where as the existing magazine has a bigger image taking up half of
the space so no room for loads of text, they is a little near her hand but
not as much as I’ve added in.
TECHNICAL QUALITIES
Similarities
From these two double page spread you can see that
they both have a main image covering one half of the
double page spread of the singer that the article is
talking about, this then shows the audience who its
about and gives them an idea what the article is
going to be about as the one that i have produced
shows her holding two awards and the article is about
her getting two awards. They both also use drop
letter at in the article this then indicates where the
article starts and is easy for them to find.
Differences
They is many differences in these two articles as
every article lay out cant be the same every article
has their own features. The double page spread
that i created has a pull quote across the main
image that i have take from the article whereas the
other article has nothing. over the image. I have
also not got background as such where as the
other double page spread has she is in a kitchen
and i just have a few flowers.
AESTHETIC QUALITIES
o I think my work looks good, I think this is because I have used all of
the common conventions making it clear that I have created a
double page spread and a front cover, the think I like the most about
my magazine front cover will have to be how I have created the
masthead ‘SMASH’ and made it look like it have been smashed I
think this just gives it a bit more of an effect. The thing I like the most
about my double page spread it how I have created the pull line and
placed the flowers behind the model, I think these little things just
make the double page spread with out them it look plain and boring.
This also is a common convention for a double page spread to have
a pull line that has been take out on the article that will interest the
audience.
AUDIENCE APPEAL
o I have made sure that I have met my audience criteria by making sure
the language, fonts, colour scheme is all suitable for teenagers girls aged
15 to 24. I have done this by researching into what this age range are
interested in and what they expect to see on a music magazine. I have
used pinks for the main colour on the magazine this is a stereotypical
colour for girls and fits I well with the model as she is wearing a dress
with pink flowers on. I have also used a variety of fonts I have used
mainly handwriting fonts I think this opens up to the audience and its
almost like Katy Perry her self has wrote it making it more personal.
PEER
FEEDBACK
FEEDBACK 1
 What did you like about the product?
 The main image is a high quality which makes it professional. It is also a mid
shot which works well with the cover layout.
 The fonts chosen are effective and work well with the genre of the magazine
and the artists.
 The cover lines are catchy and well worded with effective use of buzz words.
 The DPS ties well with the image and headline with the repetition of ‘grabbing
two’
 The article is well written and the pull quote and drops caps make the whole
piece tie together.
 What improvements could have been made to the product?
 More variety of images (models) could have been used to show variety.
 Spacing in between the article sections would allow the reader to
navigate through the article easier.
 Editorial line could have been keyed to the right for professional
conventions.
FEEDBACK 2
 What did you like about the product?
 You seem to have a high level of photography skills and brilliant eye for
colour.
 The font that is used on this magazine is very effective in the way of
attracting the audience.
 The layout of the magazine is well planned out and has all the common
conventions of what a magazine should have.
 The title of the magazine is a interesting font grabbing the attention of the
audience.
 What improvements could have been made to the
product?
 Try and introduce more images, not just of celebrities but of anyone.
 You might find it effective if you used more of a variety of colours to
contrast with the beautiful pinks and peaches.
FEEDBACK 3
 What did you like about the product?
 What I like about this product is that the front cover is
very eye catching and I think it will attract your target
audience and I think the front cover tells you a lot about
the magazine before you even open it, and also the font
and background fit really well together.
What improvements could have been made to the
product?
 I think improvements that could be made are that you
could add a flower on to your double page spread and
on the front cover where it says “Katy Perry” is a
different colour on the double page spread so they could
both be the same colour.
PEER FEEDBACK SUMMARY
 What do you agree with from your peer feedback?
 I agree with mostly everything that people have said I
think that they is little things that I could improve but this
wouldn’t stop my magazine been viewed by the public.
 What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
 I disagree with adding in flowers on the front cover as it
is already full with information and looks fine with out. I
also disagree with making Katy Perry the same colour
on my front cover as in my article I have taken how she
shows her name off on the internet and albums and
used it for the article to add in some personal touches.
PEER FEEDBACK SUMMARY
I think if i was to do this magazine front cover and double page
spread again i would take in to count that i should add more
images of different people and not just stick to one model this is
the only main this that i would change other little bits i would also
change like making sure the spaces in between the articles was
the same making sure its all in the right place. apart from them
little bits i wouldn't change anything i think that it has all of the
common conventions of a magazine and they isn't also that you
can change. its just little bits but these wouldn't effect it been put
on the market.

More Related Content

PPTX
Evaluation 7
PPTX
EVALUATION - QUESTION I
PPTX
7. evaluation(1)
PPTX
Evaluation
PPTX
Evaluation question 7
PPTX
Evaluation
ODP
EVALUATION - QUESTION 7
PPTX
Evaluation question 1
Evaluation 7
EVALUATION - QUESTION I
7. evaluation(1)
Evaluation
Evaluation question 7
Evaluation
EVALUATION - QUESTION 7
Evaluation question 1

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Evaluation question 1
PPTX
Evaluation question one
PPTX
Magazine design evaluation
PPTX
Evaluation h – skills development
PPTX
Evaluation
PPTX
As media evaluation – question 7
PPTX
Magazine design evaluation
PPTX
7. evaluation
PPTX
Question 1
PPTX
Evaluation j – addressing an audience
PPTX
Evaluation (4)
PPTX
Final
PPTX
Magazine design evaluation
PPTX
Magazine Evaluation PowerPoint
PPTX
Evaluation (1)
PPTX
Fl evaluation
PPT
Media Evaluation
PPTX
7. Evaluation
PPTX
Fmp evaluation real
PPTX
Media evaluation
Evaluation question 1
Evaluation question one
Magazine design evaluation
Evaluation h – skills development
Evaluation
As media evaluation – question 7
Magazine design evaluation
7. evaluation
Question 1
Evaluation j – addressing an audience
Evaluation (4)
Final
Magazine design evaluation
Magazine Evaluation PowerPoint
Evaluation (1)
Fl evaluation
Media Evaluation
7. Evaluation
Fmp evaluation real
Media evaluation
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
1. initial plans(2)
PPTX
5. pre production(2)
PPTX
1. communication methods pro forma(1)
PPTX
DST 251 Chapter Expert Peters 6
DOCX
Current resume
PPTX
Study in singapore
PPT
Glosarium card teks biografi heni dan lailatul a.x tkj 2 vocsten malang
PDF
Jak probíhal vývoj platformy pro vývojáře
DOCX
Propuesta para la inversion del sector publico
PPTX
7. evaluation(4)
PPTX
5. pre production
PPTX
7. evaluation
PPTX
3. production experiments(3)
PPTX
Theory Audience
PPTX
6. production reflection
PPTX
3.production experiments
PPTX
3. production experiments
PPTX
1. initial plans
PPTX
1. initial plans(4)
DOCX
4. proposal(3)
1. initial plans(2)
5. pre production(2)
1. communication methods pro forma(1)
DST 251 Chapter Expert Peters 6
Current resume
Study in singapore
Glosarium card teks biografi heni dan lailatul a.x tkj 2 vocsten malang
Jak probíhal vývoj platformy pro vývojáře
Propuesta para la inversion del sector publico
7. evaluation(4)
5. pre production
7. evaluation
3. production experiments(3)
Theory Audience
6. production reflection
3.production experiments
3. production experiments
1. initial plans
1. initial plans(4)
4. proposal(3)
Ad

Similar to 7. evaluation(3) (20)

PPTX
7. evaluation(3)
PPTX
7. evaluation(3)
PPTX
7. evaluation final
PPTX
7. evaluation unit 5
PPTX
7. evaluation(3)
PPTX
Evaluation
PPTX
7. evaluation
PPTX
7. evaluation(3)
PPTX
7. evaluation
PPTX
7. evaluation(3)
PPTX
7. evaluation
PPTX
7. evaluation(3)
PPTX
7. evaluation (1) (1)
PPTX
Main task evaluation
PPTX
7. evaluation(1)
PPTX
7. evaluation(3)
PPTX
7. evaluation
PPTX
7. FMP Evaluation
PPTX
7. evaluation
PPTX
Media work - Sarah Hindle.
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation final
7. evaluation unit 5
7. evaluation(3)
Evaluation
7. evaluation
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation (1) (1)
Main task evaluation
7. evaluation(1)
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation
7. FMP Evaluation
7. evaluation
Media work - Sarah Hindle.

More from Jordannekay99 (20)

PPTX
5. pre production(3) 2
PPTX
2. fmp research 2
DOCX
4. fmp proposal 2
PPTX
7. fmp evaluation 2
PPTX
6. fmp production reflection 2
PPTX
5. fmp pre production 2
PPTX
3. fmp production experiments 2
PPTX
1. fmp initial plans 2
DOCX
3. formal proposal advergame
DOCX
Formal proposal 2
DOCX
4. proposal(3) 2
PPTX
1. communication methods pro forma(1) improved 2
PPTX
6. fmp production reflection
PPTX
5. fmp pre production
DOCX
4. fmp proposal
PPTX
3. fmp production experiments
PPTX
6. production reflection(3)
PPTX
5. pre production(3)
PPTX
7. evaluation(2)
PPTX
6. production reflection(2)
5. pre production(3) 2
2. fmp research 2
4. fmp proposal 2
7. fmp evaluation 2
6. fmp production reflection 2
5. fmp pre production 2
3. fmp production experiments 2
1. fmp initial plans 2
3. formal proposal advergame
Formal proposal 2
4. proposal(3) 2
1. communication methods pro forma(1) improved 2
6. fmp production reflection
5. fmp pre production
4. fmp proposal
3. fmp production experiments
6. production reflection(3)
5. pre production(3)
7. evaluation(2)
6. production reflection(2)

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
ANTIBIOTICS.pptx.pdf………………… xxxxxxxxxxxxx
PPTX
master seminar digital applications in india
PDF
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PPTX
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
PDF
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
PPTX
Week 4 Term 3 Study Techniques revisited.pptx
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
Basic Mud Logging Guide for educational purpose
PPTX
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
PDF
FourierSeries-QuestionsWithAnswers(Part-A).pdf
PPTX
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx
PDF
Physiotherapy_for_Respiratory_and_Cardiac_Problems WEBBER.pdf
PDF
Mark Klimek Lecture Notes_240423 revision books _173037.pdf
PDF
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
PDF
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
PDF
Insiders guide to clinical Medicine.pdf
PDF
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
PDF
Origin of periodic table-Mendeleev’s Periodic-Modern Periodic table
ANTIBIOTICS.pptx.pdf………………… xxxxxxxxxxxxx
master seminar digital applications in india
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
Week 4 Term 3 Study Techniques revisited.pptx
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Basic Mud Logging Guide for educational purpose
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
FourierSeries-QuestionsWithAnswers(Part-A).pdf
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx
Physiotherapy_for_Respiratory_and_Cardiac_Problems WEBBER.pdf
Mark Klimek Lecture Notes_240423 revision books _173037.pdf
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
Insiders guide to clinical Medicine.pdf
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
Origin of periodic table-Mendeleev’s Periodic-Modern Periodic table

7. evaluation(3)

  • 2. RESEARCH  I think my strengths of my research was analysing the different front covers and double page spread I managed to pick out all of the different conventions of a magazine and double page spread. I then was able to add all of these common conventions into my own front cover and double page spread, this really helped me think about what I was going to add in to my own work.  I think the weakness of my research was been able to fill in and collect information for my audience profile, this is a key part to the research as you need to know who you want your audience to be for you to decide on colour schemes, plug, buzzwords, masthead etc.
  • 3. PLANNING  My strengths of my planning will be drawing and drafting my two layouts by doing this it helped me plan out how I wanted my front cover and double page spread to look by including all of the conventions that I found out in my research. This then helped my when it cam to making my final product as I already have an idea of how I wanted it to look, I changed a few this like the way some of the text was placed but I still included a lot of what I have drafted.  My weaknesses of planning would be making my schedule for the next 8 days of production, as I had no idea what was going to happen when my work corrupted so I went of schedule a little bit but I managed to get all of my work done I just didn’t have time to go extra pages for my magazine. Also filling in the contingency planning and props & locations as it is very hard to think of every potential issue that could happen and think of how you can resolve the problem if something does happen I also forgot to add things in so I had to back and make sure that they was all full and all correct.
  • 4. TIME MANAGEMENT  I think I managed my time well and I managed to get everything in on time, I don’t think I would as I lost my Photoshop files so I had to re-do them again but I managed to get it all in on time and get the magazine front cover and double page spread finished. From getting a head of research and planning I was able to do the Photoshop files if I was behind I don’t think I would have managed to get them in on time.
  • 5. TECHNICAL QUALITIES Similarities They isn’t much that is the same between my magazine and the existing product but the main headline are in the same place across the image this is telling use who the main headline is about and who it is as they is an image of the, the way that its placed on the models is like they are telling the audience themselves what they are going to be talking about. They have also got the issue number in the same place, this is easy for the audience to see but small enough so I doesn’t takeover. Differences They is a lot of differences in these two magazines and that’s not a bad thing because every magazine needs to me original and if every magazine was the same then everyone would get bored of seeing the same lay out etc. They expect to see something new when buying a magazine even if it’s the smallest thing. For example my magazine has a barcode, price, plug and more I have a lot of cover lines, give a ways and my image is small but big enough where as the existing magazine has a bigger image taking up half of the space so no room for loads of text, they is a little near her hand but not as much as I’ve added in.
  • 6. TECHNICAL QUALITIES Similarities From these two double page spread you can see that they both have a main image covering one half of the double page spread of the singer that the article is talking about, this then shows the audience who its about and gives them an idea what the article is going to be about as the one that i have produced shows her holding two awards and the article is about her getting two awards. They both also use drop letter at in the article this then indicates where the article starts and is easy for them to find. Differences They is many differences in these two articles as every article lay out cant be the same every article has their own features. The double page spread that i created has a pull quote across the main image that i have take from the article whereas the other article has nothing. over the image. I have also not got background as such where as the other double page spread has she is in a kitchen and i just have a few flowers.
  • 7. AESTHETIC QUALITIES o I think my work looks good, I think this is because I have used all of the common conventions making it clear that I have created a double page spread and a front cover, the think I like the most about my magazine front cover will have to be how I have created the masthead ‘SMASH’ and made it look like it have been smashed I think this just gives it a bit more of an effect. The thing I like the most about my double page spread it how I have created the pull line and placed the flowers behind the model, I think these little things just make the double page spread with out them it look plain and boring. This also is a common convention for a double page spread to have a pull line that has been take out on the article that will interest the audience.
  • 8. AUDIENCE APPEAL o I have made sure that I have met my audience criteria by making sure the language, fonts, colour scheme is all suitable for teenagers girls aged 15 to 24. I have done this by researching into what this age range are interested in and what they expect to see on a music magazine. I have used pinks for the main colour on the magazine this is a stereotypical colour for girls and fits I well with the model as she is wearing a dress with pink flowers on. I have also used a variety of fonts I have used mainly handwriting fonts I think this opens up to the audience and its almost like Katy Perry her self has wrote it making it more personal.
  • 10. FEEDBACK 1  What did you like about the product?  The main image is a high quality which makes it professional. It is also a mid shot which works well with the cover layout.  The fonts chosen are effective and work well with the genre of the magazine and the artists.  The cover lines are catchy and well worded with effective use of buzz words.  The DPS ties well with the image and headline with the repetition of ‘grabbing two’  The article is well written and the pull quote and drops caps make the whole piece tie together.  What improvements could have been made to the product?  More variety of images (models) could have been used to show variety.  Spacing in between the article sections would allow the reader to navigate through the article easier.  Editorial line could have been keyed to the right for professional conventions.
  • 11. FEEDBACK 2  What did you like about the product?  You seem to have a high level of photography skills and brilliant eye for colour.  The font that is used on this magazine is very effective in the way of attracting the audience.  The layout of the magazine is well planned out and has all the common conventions of what a magazine should have.  The title of the magazine is a interesting font grabbing the attention of the audience.  What improvements could have been made to the product?  Try and introduce more images, not just of celebrities but of anyone.  You might find it effective if you used more of a variety of colours to contrast with the beautiful pinks and peaches.
  • 12. FEEDBACK 3  What did you like about the product?  What I like about this product is that the front cover is very eye catching and I think it will attract your target audience and I think the front cover tells you a lot about the magazine before you even open it, and also the font and background fit really well together. What improvements could have been made to the product?  I think improvements that could be made are that you could add a flower on to your double page spread and on the front cover where it says “Katy Perry” is a different colour on the double page spread so they could both be the same colour.
  • 13. PEER FEEDBACK SUMMARY  What do you agree with from your peer feedback?  I agree with mostly everything that people have said I think that they is little things that I could improve but this wouldn’t stop my magazine been viewed by the public.  What do you disagree with from your peer feedback?  I disagree with adding in flowers on the front cover as it is already full with information and looks fine with out. I also disagree with making Katy Perry the same colour on my front cover as in my article I have taken how she shows her name off on the internet and albums and used it for the article to add in some personal touches.
  • 14. PEER FEEDBACK SUMMARY I think if i was to do this magazine front cover and double page spread again i would take in to count that i should add more images of different people and not just stick to one model this is the only main this that i would change other little bits i would also change like making sure the spaces in between the articles was the same making sure its all in the right place. apart from them little bits i wouldn't change anything i think that it has all of the common conventions of a magazine and they isn't also that you can change. its just little bits but these wouldn't effect it been put on the market.

Editor's Notes

  • #3: What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product? What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  • #4: What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product? What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  • #5: Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time? What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
  • #6: Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences Put your final piece(s) in the center of a page alongside an existing product Use text boxes and arrows
  • #8: Does your work look good? Was it creative? What aspects of your game’s visuals do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses Put your final piece(s) in the center of a page and analyses them Use text boxes and arrows
  • #9: How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience. Refer to your findings from your questionnaire. Put your final piece(s) in the center of a page and analyses them Use text boxes and arrows
  • #15: What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?