SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Ed Hightower
IEEE-CVT Dallas,TX
September 29, 2015
 Brief history of M2M and the Internet of Things (IoT)
 Key Components of the IoT
 Devices / remote terminals / objects
 Wireless Networks: now and in the future
 Cellular
 WiFi / Bluetooth / Mesh / Short Range Devices / etc.
 Low PowerWANs:Weightless / LoRaWANs / NB-LTE / SIGFOX
 IoT Backend: infrastructure, platforms, databases
 Software Defined Networking
 Network FunctionVirtualization
 Q&A
 These are my personal
observations
 Not speaking on behalf of
BlackBerry or any other
entity
 Thanks to these companies
and groups for the public
information they provided
 Logos shown in this
presentation are
copyrights of their
respective owners
1926: NikolaTesla in an interview with Colliers
magazine:
"When wireless is perfectly applied the whole earth
will be converted into a huge brain, which in fact it is,
all things being particles of a real and rhythmic
whole.........and the instruments through which we
shall be able to do this will be amazingly simple
compared with our present telephone. A man will
be able to carry one in his vest pocket."
1832: An electromagnetic telegraph was
created by Baron Schilling in Russia, and in
1833 Carl Friedrich Gauss andWilhelmWeber
invented their own code to communicate over
a distance of 1200 m within Göttingen,
Germany.
1844: Samuel Morse sends the first Morse
code public telegraph message "What hath
God wrought?" fromWashington, D.C. to
Baltimore.
 Telemetry
 SCADA
 Industrial Automation
 Telematics
 Wireline
 Microwave
 Private Radio
 Wi-Fi
 Satellite
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
 Digitize
 Deceptive
 Disruptive
 Dematerialize
 Demonetize
 Democratize
Peter Diamandis of
- X Prize Foundation
- Singularity University
 Integrated circuit is invented in 1958
 Jack Kilby and Robert Noyce changed the
world
 Basis for all electronic devices we have today
 1984 - Bell telephone monopoly was
disbanded
 Early 80’s – personal computers
 Early 90’s – the Internet became
available to the masses
 2007 – Apple introduced the iPhone
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
The Internet ofThings will:
 Become the nervous system for the planet
 Help optimize our planet:
 smarter power distribution
 more efficient cities
 digital battlefields
 self-optimizing supply chains
 hyper-targeted products
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
DEVICES IOT BACKEND
SYSTEMS
NETWORKS
 Sensors / Actuators
 Processor / Memory
 Transceiver
 Embedded Application
 Embedded Operating
System (OS)
EMBEDDED OS / SOFTWAREAPPS / SYSTEMS INTEGRATION
 QNX
 Wind River
 LynxWorks
 Green Hills Software
 DDC-I
 Linux
 Mentor Graphics
 Windows CE & NT Embedded
 ENEA AB
 Sysgo
 Samsung
 SierraWireless
 Telit
 NetconnWireless
 Kontron
 Novatel Wireless
 Devices in the future will become:
 More ubiquitous
 More intelligent
 Smaller
 Economical
 Like dust
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
 Wireline
 Microwave
 Private Radio
 Cellular (2G, 3G, LTE)
 Wi-Fi / Mesh / ZigBee / SRD
 Satellite
• Cellular is very expensive, power
hungry and complex to implement and
manage
• Wi-Fi, mesh, ZigBee, Bluetooth, etc.
suffer from short range and complexity
to manage large scale deployments
• Private radio, microwave are not
ubiquitous
• Satellite is expensive and impractical for
many applications.
22
Projected by Type
Lo Power
WAN
Internet of objects
LAN
BT
Cellular
 Per Machina Research:
• More than 50% of IoT/M2M
connections need only a few bytes of
data transmitted to and from the
remote device periodically
• Real-time communications not needed
i.e. some latency is acceptable
• Long battery life required
• In-building coverage/penetration
desired
Connected Devices: Access
Short Range
Communicating Devices
Long Range w/ Battery
Internet of Objects
Long Range w/Power
Traditional M2M
 Well established
standards
 Good for:
• Mobile devices
• In-home
• Short range
 Not good:
• Battery life
• Long range
 Well established
standards
 Good for:
• Long range
• High data-rate
• Coverage
 Not good:
• Battery life
• Cost
 Emerging PHY
solutions / Undecided
 Good for:
• Long range
• Long battery
• Low cost
 Not good:
• High data-rate
Cellular
Lo Power
WAN
LAN
 Narrow band vs Spread spectrum
 Unlicensed frequencies vs Cellular spectrum
Key approaches to LPWAN implementation:
 Typical LPWAN Protocols:
 WeightlessW
▪ Spread spectrum inTVWhite Space
 Weightless N and P
▪ Ultra narrow band
 LoRa protocol standards
▪ Spread spectrum – ISM bands
 SIGFOX
▪ Ultra narrow band
 NB-LTE (Nokia-Intel-Ericsson)
▪ 3GPP approved on Sept. 14, 2015
 NB-CIoT (Huawei-Vodafone-China Unicom)
Internet of Objects
80% of volume
Requirements:
 Connect battery operated low
cost assets?
 Outdoor & harsh environments
 Low cost communication
 Low cost infrastructure
 Low power technology
 Robust communication
 Permits mobility
 Scalable system
• White Space refers to frequencies allocated to
a broadcasting service but not used locally
• FCC Approved use of White Space in Sept.
2010
– Geolocation database must be queried
to confirm frequency is available in that
area
– No spectrum sensing sensor required in
device (WSD)
• VHF/UHF TV Channels 7 - 69 (174-800 MHz)
of particular interest due to propagation and
global harmonization
– VHF/UHF travels far and penetrates
buildings well
– TV channels are same around the world
 ISM (Industrial, scientific & medical radio
bands) and Short Range Device (SRD):
• 902 – 928 MHz in US
• 868 - 870 MHz in Europe (telemetry)
• 169, 433, 470 – 510, 780 MHz
 Unlicensed WiFi frequencies in both the
US and Europe
• 2.4 / 5.8 GHz
 Cellular frequencies (dedicated channels,
subcarriers / guard bands)
• FCC / Ofcom under pressure to make
additional frequencies available
 Open Standard
 Ultra Narrow Band
 One-way communications
 Differential binary phase shift keying
 Sub 1-GHz unlicensed spectrum
 Frequency hopping
 128 bit AES shared secret key regime
 High performance
 Adaptive data rate - 200 bps to 100kbps
 Two-way communication
 169, 433, 470 – 510, 780, 868, 915 MHz
 Long range
 2km in urban environment
 Ultra-low-power
 Ultra-low-power <10uA/node : <10% of BT or
ZigBee network
 Adaptive data rate from 200bps to 100kbps
 Using common PHY (GFSK, oQPSK, 802.15.4)
 Ultra-large network
 Easily-scaled up to 50,000 wireless clients
 Consistent energy efficiency across all clients
 Smart networking for easy maintenance
 - Reliable wireless
 Interactive radio using sub-1GHz ISM bands
excellent coverage and penetration
 FDMA+TDMA modulation in 12.5 kHz channels
 AES-128 encryption for security
www.weightless.org/about/weightlessP
For more info
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
 Proprietary protocol
 Spread spectrum technology
 Long range / Two-way comm.
 Low power consumption
 Three classes of device endpoints:
 Class A – each endpoint transmission is followed by
two short downlink receive windows / long battery life
 Class B – Class A functionality plus extra receive
windows at scheduled times
 Class C – continuously open receive windows closed
only when the endpoint is transmitting
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
 Proprietary protocol
 Ultra Narrow Band
 Added two-way communications recently
 Head start – deployed in 8 countries
 Plan for 60 countries in 5 years
 Will provide global cellular-IoT connectivity
 Significant ecosystem/investment partners
 Samsung, Telefonica, SKTelecom, NTT Docomo, GDF
Suez, Air Liquide, Eutelsat, Elliott Mgt., etc.
 Received over $145 in investments as of mid 2015
 About to launch in 10 US cities
 LoRa utilized a spread spectrum based modulation
Advantages
 Demodulate below noise floor – 30dB better than FSK
 Better sensitivity than FSK (better Eb/No)
 More robust to interference, noise, and jamming
 Spreading codes orthogonal – multiple signals can occupy same channel
 Tolerant to freq offsets (unlike DSSS)
LoRa Overview
 NB-CIoT (Narrow Band – Cellular IoT)
 Promoted by Huawei (purchased Neul)
 A variation of theWeightless-W by Neul
 Support fromVodafone and China Unicom
 Needs clean slate, i.e. an overlay network
 Low power consumption
 Low cost modules
 Support for massive number of devices
 Low delay sensitivity
 NB-LTE (Narrow Band – LTE)
 Accepted by 3GPP as standard Sept. 14, 2015
 Pushed by Nokia, Ericsson and Intel
 Can be fully integrated into existing LTE networks
 Backward compatible with existing LTE networks
 Works within current LTE bands and guard bands
 Does not need an overlay network
 Low power consumption
 Low cost modules
 Support for massive number of devices
 Low delay sensitivity
 Alcatel-Lucent
 Alcatel-Lucent
Shanghai Bell
 AT&T
 CATT
 DeutscheTelekom
 Ericsson
 Huawei
 HiSilicon
 Intel
 Interdigital
 LG Electronics
 Nokia Networks
 OPPO
 Panasonic
Qualcomm Incorporated
Samsung
Sony
SouthernLINC
Sprint
Telecom Italia SPA
Telefonica
TeliaSonera
T-Mobile US
u-blox
US Cellular
Verizon
Vodafone
ZTE Corporation
• SigFox – (UNB)
• NwaveTechnologies – (Weightless-N)
• Semtech – (LoRaWAN - proprietary)
• M2Communications(Weightless-P)
• Huawei (formerly Neul) – (Weightless)
• On-Ramp is now Ingenu – (Total Reach /
RPMA - Utilities)
• Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) /
Cellular Carriers – (NB-LTE a 3GPP std., Release 13,
product expected 2018)
• Entrepreneurs / startups
 pCell/pWave radios transmit signals that
deliberately interfere with each other, combining
to synthesize tiny pCells, each just one cm in size
 pCell is a pure software-defined radio C-RAN
 Steve Perlman and team have worked on this
over a decade
 Recently announced pCell IoT and pCellVR
 Artemis web page:
 http://www.artemis.com/
 Stanford University lecture/demo:
 http://www.artemis.com/pcell
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
 Software-defined networking (SDN)
is an approach to computer
networking that
allows network administrators to
manage network services through
abstraction of higher-level functionality.
This is done by decoupling the system
that makes decisions about where traffic
is sent (the control plane) from the
underlying systems that forward traffic
to the selected destination (the data
plane).
 Experts say that SDN, through its ability to intelligently route
traffic and use underutilized network resources, will make it
much easier to prepare for the data onslaught of IoT.
 SDNs will eliminate bottlenecks and induce efficiencies to
help the data generated by IoT to be processed without
placing a larger strain on the network.
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
OpenFlow protocols & SDN
 SDN is much more than
just OpenFlow
protocols
 Whole eco-system:
 SDN Apps
 Network OS
 Network Elements
 Interfaces in between
Control Plane
Data Plane
Applications
API
Network Operating
System
API
API
Switch/Network
Element
API
SDN
 Network-function virtualization (NFV) is a
network architecture concept that uses the technologies of IT
virtualization to virtualize entire classes
of network node functions into building blocks that may
connect, or chain together, to create communication services.
 NFV focuses on optimizing the network services themselves.
NFV decouples the network functions, such as DNS, Caching,
etc., from proprietary hardware appliances, so they can run in
software to accelerate service innovation and provisioning,
particularly within service provider environments.
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
 Together, in fact, they represent
a path toward more generic
network hardware and more
open software, where the
centralized control and
management decreed in SDN can
in part be realized through the
virtualized functions and
capabilities that come from NVF.
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final
Q&A
Ed Hightower
www.linkedin.com/in/EdHightower
Ed.Hightower@IoTandBeyond.com
IEEE-CVT, Dallas,TX
September 29, 2015

More Related Content

PDF
LPWAN Technologies for Internet of Things (IoT) and M2M Scenarios
PDF
Cellular lpwan paris nov 2015
PPTX
PDF
Overview of Low Power Wide Area Networks
PPTX
An Overview of LoRA, Sigfox, and IEEE 802.11ah
PDF
Networks for Smart cities Joy Rajan Cheruvathoor iet
PDF
LoRa WAN - Connecting the Internet of Things
PDF
Lpwa 2016 amsterdam endetec keynote 20160607_e03
LPWAN Technologies for Internet of Things (IoT) and M2M Scenarios
Cellular lpwan paris nov 2015
Overview of Low Power Wide Area Networks
An Overview of LoRA, Sigfox, and IEEE 802.11ah
Networks for Smart cities Joy Rajan Cheruvathoor iet
LoRa WAN - Connecting the Internet of Things
Lpwa 2016 amsterdam endetec keynote 20160607_e03

What's hot (20)

PDF
LPWAN for IoT
PDF
LPWAN for IoT
PDF
Get started on SIGFOX
PDF
NWave Platform Overview
PDF
LPWAN technology overview
PDF
R&s 10 juin 2015 sigfox christophe
PDF
NB-IoT: a sustainable technology for connecting billions of devices
PDF
Low-Power Wide Area - Overview
PDF
Cnam2015 m2 m -iot - course 2 - warming - v(0.2)
PDF
Sigfox Technology Overview (nov 2017)
PDF
Comarch BLE & LoRa devices
PDF
LoRaWAN101_What is it
PDF
[2015] LPWAN - Overview & use cases
PDF
[2014] Sigfox - Why all the fuss
PDF
The increasing need for low power, long range communication and localization ...
PPTX
Brief LoRaWAN Overview
PDF
Intro Lora - Makers.ID Meetup
PPTX
Link Labs LPWA Webinar
PDF
LoRa vs Sigfox vs LTE-M
LPWAN for IoT
LPWAN for IoT
Get started on SIGFOX
NWave Platform Overview
LPWAN technology overview
R&s 10 juin 2015 sigfox christophe
NB-IoT: a sustainable technology for connecting billions of devices
Low-Power Wide Area - Overview
Cnam2015 m2 m -iot - course 2 - warming - v(0.2)
Sigfox Technology Overview (nov 2017)
Comarch BLE & LoRa devices
LoRaWAN101_What is it
[2015] LPWAN - Overview & use cases
[2014] Sigfox - Why all the fuss
The increasing need for low power, long range communication and localization ...
Brief LoRaWAN Overview
Intro Lora - Makers.ID Meetup
Link Labs LPWA Webinar
LoRa vs Sigfox vs LTE-M
Ad

Viewers also liked (15)

PPTX
IoT and Low Power WANs Can Enable Smart Cities and Smart Health 4-8-17
PDF
X Sector Disruption | CIO Leaders Summit 2015 | The Propell Group
PDF
Health IT & Smart Hospitals (October 19, 2016)
PDF
Powering the Future of Healthcare in Asia Pacific | Baker McKenzie | The Prop...
PDF
Capital Raising for MedTech SMEs | MedTech Forum 2015 APAC | ApacMed | The Pr...
PDF
WORKSHOP 4: Susan Wilburn_procurement_2017
PDF
Powering the Future of Healthcare in Asia | Propell | Media Exploits
PDF
Powering the Future of Healthcare in Asia - ETPL "IOT FOR HEALTH" PROGRAM | T...
PPTX
Smart health v4
PDF
Modular architectures
PDF
Customer focused product positioning (By David Pas & Alexander Frimout)
PDF
Industry 4.0, big industrial transformation (By Paul Poelmans & Joris Vanders...
PDF
Design thinking for organizational change (By Frans Joziasse, Director at PARK)
PDF
Smart health, driven by human factors engineering (By Bart Penninger)
PDF
The Future of Healthcare | Smart Health coLAB
IoT and Low Power WANs Can Enable Smart Cities and Smart Health 4-8-17
X Sector Disruption | CIO Leaders Summit 2015 | The Propell Group
Health IT & Smart Hospitals (October 19, 2016)
Powering the Future of Healthcare in Asia Pacific | Baker McKenzie | The Prop...
Capital Raising for MedTech SMEs | MedTech Forum 2015 APAC | ApacMed | The Pr...
WORKSHOP 4: Susan Wilburn_procurement_2017
Powering the Future of Healthcare in Asia | Propell | Media Exploits
Powering the Future of Healthcare in Asia - ETPL "IOT FOR HEALTH" PROGRAM | T...
Smart health v4
Modular architectures
Customer focused product positioning (By David Pas & Alexander Frimout)
Industry 4.0, big industrial transformation (By Paul Poelmans & Joris Vanders...
Design thinking for organizational change (By Frans Joziasse, Director at PARK)
Smart health, driven by human factors engineering (By Bart Penninger)
The Future of Healthcare | Smart Health coLAB
Ad

Similar to 9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final (20)

PDF
Low power wireless technologies for connecting embedded sensors in the IoT: A...
PDF
Introduction to IoT Technologies - The need to know basics
PDF
ConnectingSmartObjects..........................pdf
PDF
Global Azure Bootcamp 2017 - Azure IoT Hub with LoRa Connectivity
PDF
DCCN 2016 - Protocols and technologies for IoT
PDF
Overview of Wireless Sensor Networks
PPTX
IOT Protocols
PDF
Enabling Internet-of-Things application on a large scale
PDF
IoT connectivity and solutions
PDF
20180204 wf iot tutorial - small
PPTX
Iot trends and technologies development in terms of Machine Learning
PDF
Understanding the IoT Connectivity Landscape – A Contemporary M2M Radio Techn...
PDF
Radio Frequencies for IoT
PPTX
IOT_PPT.pptx
PDF
Talking with Things: What's Hot in Low-Power Long-Range IoT Connectivity
PPTX
LookingAroundCorners-DAS Simplified-final- BICSI Sept 2015
PPTX
UNIT 1 Nan mudhalvan how tofaefjlnajlncjlanjlcnajknfjkanjkfnajnfj
PPTX
Introduction to IoT
DOCX
Nb iot (naik hetvi)
Low power wireless technologies for connecting embedded sensors in the IoT: A...
Introduction to IoT Technologies - The need to know basics
ConnectingSmartObjects..........................pdf
Global Azure Bootcamp 2017 - Azure IoT Hub with LoRa Connectivity
DCCN 2016 - Protocols and technologies for IoT
Overview of Wireless Sensor Networks
IOT Protocols
Enabling Internet-of-Things application on a large scale
IoT connectivity and solutions
20180204 wf iot tutorial - small
Iot trends and technologies development in terms of Machine Learning
Understanding the IoT Connectivity Landscape – A Contemporary M2M Radio Techn...
Radio Frequencies for IoT
IOT_PPT.pptx
Talking with Things: What's Hot in Low-Power Long-Range IoT Connectivity
LookingAroundCorners-DAS Simplified-final- BICSI Sept 2015
UNIT 1 Nan mudhalvan how tofaefjlnajlncjlanjlcnajknfjkanjkfnajnfj
Introduction to IoT
Nb iot (naik hetvi)

9-29-15 IEEE-CVT Presentation by EH-Final

  • 2.  Brief history of M2M and the Internet of Things (IoT)  Key Components of the IoT  Devices / remote terminals / objects  Wireless Networks: now and in the future  Cellular  WiFi / Bluetooth / Mesh / Short Range Devices / etc.  Low PowerWANs:Weightless / LoRaWANs / NB-LTE / SIGFOX  IoT Backend: infrastructure, platforms, databases  Software Defined Networking  Network FunctionVirtualization  Q&A
  • 3.  These are my personal observations  Not speaking on behalf of BlackBerry or any other entity  Thanks to these companies and groups for the public information they provided  Logos shown in this presentation are copyrights of their respective owners
  • 4. 1926: NikolaTesla in an interview with Colliers magazine: "When wireless is perfectly applied the whole earth will be converted into a huge brain, which in fact it is, all things being particles of a real and rhythmic whole.........and the instruments through which we shall be able to do this will be amazingly simple compared with our present telephone. A man will be able to carry one in his vest pocket." 1832: An electromagnetic telegraph was created by Baron Schilling in Russia, and in 1833 Carl Friedrich Gauss andWilhelmWeber invented their own code to communicate over a distance of 1200 m within Göttingen, Germany. 1844: Samuel Morse sends the first Morse code public telegraph message "What hath God wrought?" fromWashington, D.C. to Baltimore.
  • 5.  Telemetry  SCADA  Industrial Automation  Telematics  Wireline  Microwave  Private Radio  Wi-Fi  Satellite
  • 8.  Digitize  Deceptive  Disruptive  Dematerialize  Demonetize  Democratize Peter Diamandis of - X Prize Foundation - Singularity University
  • 9.  Integrated circuit is invented in 1958  Jack Kilby and Robert Noyce changed the world  Basis for all electronic devices we have today  1984 - Bell telephone monopoly was disbanded  Early 80’s – personal computers  Early 90’s – the Internet became available to the masses  2007 – Apple introduced the iPhone
  • 11. The Internet ofThings will:  Become the nervous system for the planet  Help optimize our planet:  smarter power distribution  more efficient cities  digital battlefields  self-optimizing supply chains  hyper-targeted products
  • 16.  Sensors / Actuators  Processor / Memory  Transceiver  Embedded Application  Embedded Operating System (OS)
  • 17. EMBEDDED OS / SOFTWAREAPPS / SYSTEMS INTEGRATION  QNX  Wind River  LynxWorks  Green Hills Software  DDC-I  Linux  Mentor Graphics  Windows CE & NT Embedded  ENEA AB  Sysgo  Samsung  SierraWireless  Telit  NetconnWireless  Kontron  Novatel Wireless
  • 18.  Devices in the future will become:  More ubiquitous  More intelligent  Smaller  Economical  Like dust
  • 20.  Wireline  Microwave  Private Radio  Cellular (2G, 3G, LTE)  Wi-Fi / Mesh / ZigBee / SRD  Satellite
  • 21. • Cellular is very expensive, power hungry and complex to implement and manage • Wi-Fi, mesh, ZigBee, Bluetooth, etc. suffer from short range and complexity to manage large scale deployments • Private radio, microwave are not ubiquitous • Satellite is expensive and impractical for many applications.
  • 22. 22 Projected by Type Lo Power WAN Internet of objects LAN BT Cellular
  • 23.  Per Machina Research: • More than 50% of IoT/M2M connections need only a few bytes of data transmitted to and from the remote device periodically • Real-time communications not needed i.e. some latency is acceptable • Long battery life required • In-building coverage/penetration desired
  • 24. Connected Devices: Access Short Range Communicating Devices Long Range w/ Battery Internet of Objects Long Range w/Power Traditional M2M  Well established standards  Good for: • Mobile devices • In-home • Short range  Not good: • Battery life • Long range  Well established standards  Good for: • Long range • High data-rate • Coverage  Not good: • Battery life • Cost  Emerging PHY solutions / Undecided  Good for: • Long range • Long battery • Low cost  Not good: • High data-rate Cellular Lo Power WAN LAN
  • 25.  Narrow band vs Spread spectrum  Unlicensed frequencies vs Cellular spectrum Key approaches to LPWAN implementation:
  • 26.  Typical LPWAN Protocols:  WeightlessW ▪ Spread spectrum inTVWhite Space  Weightless N and P ▪ Ultra narrow band  LoRa protocol standards ▪ Spread spectrum – ISM bands  SIGFOX ▪ Ultra narrow band  NB-LTE (Nokia-Intel-Ericsson) ▪ 3GPP approved on Sept. 14, 2015  NB-CIoT (Huawei-Vodafone-China Unicom)
  • 27. Internet of Objects 80% of volume Requirements:  Connect battery operated low cost assets?  Outdoor & harsh environments  Low cost communication  Low cost infrastructure  Low power technology  Robust communication  Permits mobility  Scalable system
  • 28. • White Space refers to frequencies allocated to a broadcasting service but not used locally • FCC Approved use of White Space in Sept. 2010 – Geolocation database must be queried to confirm frequency is available in that area – No spectrum sensing sensor required in device (WSD) • VHF/UHF TV Channels 7 - 69 (174-800 MHz) of particular interest due to propagation and global harmonization – VHF/UHF travels far and penetrates buildings well – TV channels are same around the world
  • 29.  ISM (Industrial, scientific & medical radio bands) and Short Range Device (SRD): • 902 – 928 MHz in US • 868 - 870 MHz in Europe (telemetry) • 169, 433, 470 – 510, 780 MHz  Unlicensed WiFi frequencies in both the US and Europe • 2.4 / 5.8 GHz  Cellular frequencies (dedicated channels, subcarriers / guard bands) • FCC / Ofcom under pressure to make additional frequencies available
  • 30.  Open Standard  Ultra Narrow Band  One-way communications  Differential binary phase shift keying  Sub 1-GHz unlicensed spectrum  Frequency hopping  128 bit AES shared secret key regime
  • 31.  High performance  Adaptive data rate - 200 bps to 100kbps  Two-way communication  169, 433, 470 – 510, 780, 868, 915 MHz  Long range  2km in urban environment  Ultra-low-power  Ultra-low-power <10uA/node : <10% of BT or ZigBee network  Adaptive data rate from 200bps to 100kbps  Using common PHY (GFSK, oQPSK, 802.15.4)  Ultra-large network  Easily-scaled up to 50,000 wireless clients  Consistent energy efficiency across all clients  Smart networking for easy maintenance  - Reliable wireless  Interactive radio using sub-1GHz ISM bands excellent coverage and penetration  FDMA+TDMA modulation in 12.5 kHz channels  AES-128 encryption for security www.weightless.org/about/weightlessP For more info
  • 33.  Proprietary protocol  Spread spectrum technology  Long range / Two-way comm.  Low power consumption  Three classes of device endpoints:  Class A – each endpoint transmission is followed by two short downlink receive windows / long battery life  Class B – Class A functionality plus extra receive windows at scheduled times  Class C – continuously open receive windows closed only when the endpoint is transmitting
  • 35.  Proprietary protocol  Ultra Narrow Band  Added two-way communications recently  Head start – deployed in 8 countries  Plan for 60 countries in 5 years  Will provide global cellular-IoT connectivity  Significant ecosystem/investment partners  Samsung, Telefonica, SKTelecom, NTT Docomo, GDF Suez, Air Liquide, Eutelsat, Elliott Mgt., etc.  Received over $145 in investments as of mid 2015  About to launch in 10 US cities
  • 36.  LoRa utilized a spread spectrum based modulation Advantages  Demodulate below noise floor – 30dB better than FSK  Better sensitivity than FSK (better Eb/No)  More robust to interference, noise, and jamming  Spreading codes orthogonal – multiple signals can occupy same channel  Tolerant to freq offsets (unlike DSSS) LoRa Overview
  • 37.  NB-CIoT (Narrow Band – Cellular IoT)  Promoted by Huawei (purchased Neul)  A variation of theWeightless-W by Neul  Support fromVodafone and China Unicom  Needs clean slate, i.e. an overlay network  Low power consumption  Low cost modules  Support for massive number of devices  Low delay sensitivity
  • 38.  NB-LTE (Narrow Band – LTE)  Accepted by 3GPP as standard Sept. 14, 2015  Pushed by Nokia, Ericsson and Intel  Can be fully integrated into existing LTE networks  Backward compatible with existing LTE networks  Works within current LTE bands and guard bands  Does not need an overlay network  Low power consumption  Low cost modules  Support for massive number of devices  Low delay sensitivity
  • 39.  Alcatel-Lucent  Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell  AT&T  CATT  DeutscheTelekom  Ericsson  Huawei  HiSilicon  Intel  Interdigital  LG Electronics  Nokia Networks  OPPO  Panasonic Qualcomm Incorporated Samsung Sony SouthernLINC Sprint Telecom Italia SPA Telefonica TeliaSonera T-Mobile US u-blox US Cellular Verizon Vodafone ZTE Corporation
  • 40. • SigFox – (UNB) • NwaveTechnologies – (Weightless-N) • Semtech – (LoRaWAN - proprietary) • M2Communications(Weightless-P) • Huawei (formerly Neul) – (Weightless) • On-Ramp is now Ingenu – (Total Reach / RPMA - Utilities) • Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) / Cellular Carriers – (NB-LTE a 3GPP std., Release 13, product expected 2018) • Entrepreneurs / startups
  • 41.  pCell/pWave radios transmit signals that deliberately interfere with each other, combining to synthesize tiny pCells, each just one cm in size  pCell is a pure software-defined radio C-RAN  Steve Perlman and team have worked on this over a decade  Recently announced pCell IoT and pCellVR  Artemis web page:  http://www.artemis.com/  Stanford University lecture/demo:  http://www.artemis.com/pcell
  • 45.  Software-defined networking (SDN) is an approach to computer networking that allows network administrators to manage network services through abstraction of higher-level functionality. This is done by decoupling the system that makes decisions about where traffic is sent (the control plane) from the underlying systems that forward traffic to the selected destination (the data plane).
  • 46.  Experts say that SDN, through its ability to intelligently route traffic and use underutilized network resources, will make it much easier to prepare for the data onslaught of IoT.  SDNs will eliminate bottlenecks and induce efficiencies to help the data generated by IoT to be processed without placing a larger strain on the network.
  • 48. OpenFlow protocols & SDN  SDN is much more than just OpenFlow protocols  Whole eco-system:  SDN Apps  Network OS  Network Elements  Interfaces in between Control Plane Data Plane Applications API Network Operating System API API Switch/Network Element API SDN
  • 49.  Network-function virtualization (NFV) is a network architecture concept that uses the technologies of IT virtualization to virtualize entire classes of network node functions into building blocks that may connect, or chain together, to create communication services.  NFV focuses on optimizing the network services themselves. NFV decouples the network functions, such as DNS, Caching, etc., from proprietary hardware appliances, so they can run in software to accelerate service innovation and provisioning, particularly within service provider environments.
  • 53.  Together, in fact, they represent a path toward more generic network hardware and more open software, where the centralized control and management decreed in SDN can in part be realized through the virtualized functions and capabilities that come from NVF.
  • 56. Q&A

Editor's Notes

  • #7: Thanks to Moore’s law, the cost of sensors, processors, memory and all things electronic has to dropped significantly while doubling its capability every two years or so.
  • #8: Break up of Bell Telephone Monopoly in 1984; creation of integrated circuits in the 70’s; personal computers in early 80’s; internet in early 90’s; iPhone in 2007.
  • #14: Thanks to Moore’s law, the cost of sensors, processors, memory and all things electronic has to dropped significantly while doubling its capability every two years or so.
  • #18: A lot of focus on reliability (hard real-time OS important for some apps), Security and robust environment important as well.