A Career Exploration Program For Learning Disabled High School Students

ED 321 197
'AUTHOR
TITLE
SPONS AGENCY-
PUB -DATE
NOTE
PUB TYPE
EDRS PRICE
DESCRIPTORS
ABSTRACT
"DOCUMENT RESUME
CG 022 641
Moser, Rosemarie Scolaro
A Career-Exploration Program_for Learning-Disabled-
High School Students.
American Association for Counseling. and Human
Development Foundation, Alexandria, VA.
87
48p.
Reports - Descriptive (141) -- Reports -
Research /Technical (143)
MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage.,
*Careet Exploration; Careet Guidance; Computer Uses
in Education; Counselor Attitudes; Counselor Teacher
Cooperation; Grade 11; Grade 12; High Schools; *High
School Students; *Learning Disabilitie6; *School
Counselors; Special Education; Student Attitudes
A nine-session career exploration program was
presented by special education teachers and guidance counselors to a
group of learning disabled high school 11th and 12th graders in New
Jersey. The program included the use of DISCOVER, a computerized
career guidance system. Thirty-six students comprised- the initial
treatment and control groups. The Self-Directed Search, Career
Decision Scale, Self-Esteem-Inventofy, ant: a program evaluation form
were completed by the students. Teachers and counselors also
completed evaluation forms and submitted logs containing program
notes. The following variables were examined: self - esteem,- career
indecision, congruence, differentiation, number of identified job
potsibilities, and perceived usefulness of the proaraM. It appeared
that the program May have impacted'congruence, number of identified
job possibilittes, and career indecision. Students seemed to view the
program positively. Interestingly, counselors chose to-participate
minimally in the program and rated it least positively. It is
speculated that counselors may lack the competence to serve these.
students and may not see such activities as part .of their roles.
(Author)
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made
from the original document.

Career Exploration 1
A Career Exploration
Program for Learning Disabled
High School Students
Rosemarie Scolaro Mosey-, Ph.D.
Helene Fuld Medical Center
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Educational Research end Improvement
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION
CENTER (ERIC)
'ilia document has been reproduced as
received from the person or orgenizahon
onginating
0 Minor changes have been made to improve
reproduction qualify.
Points Of viewer ocemonsatated on this docu-
ment do not necessarily represent official
OERI Position or policy
"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS
MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
Sand i V1< <u ttz.
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)."
Running head: A CAREER EXPLORATION PROGRAM
2 BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Career Exploration
Abstract
A nine session career exploration program was
presented by special education teachers and guidance
Counselors to a group of learning disabled high school
eleventh and twelfth, graderd. The program included the
use of DISCOVER, a computerized career guidance system.
Thirty-six students comprised the- nitial treatment and
control groups. The Self-Directed Search, Career
Decision Scale, Self-Esteem Inventory, and a program
evaluation form were completed by students. Teachers
and counselors also completed evaluation forms and
submitted logs containing program. notes. The following
variables were examined: self-esteem, career indecision,
congruence, differentiation, number of identified job
possibilities, and perceived usefulness of the program.
It appgared that the pro4ram may have impacted
congruende, number-of identified job possibilities, and
career indecision. Students seemed to view the program
positively. Interestingly, counselors chose to
participate minimally, in the program and rated
it least positively. It is speculated that
counselors may lack the competence to serve these
students and may not see such activities as part of their
roles.

Career Exploration. 3
A Career Exploration Program for Learning
Disabled High School Students142'
With the advent of Public Law 94-!742, a
strong commitment was made to address the educational
needs of all students. Initially, efforts were
focused on identifying young, disabled children and
providing them with, appropriate academic
remediation. 'The greatest energies were invested in
areas of the greatest perceived need.
Disability, however, does not necessarily end in
the elementary school years. Thus, in high school,
this special population continues to demonstrate
educational needs which may be different from those of
nonexceptional students.
In particular, during the' high school years,
career education and exploration become a significant
area of concern for all students (Super, 1983). Yet,
little attention has been given to the career
development needs of students not the mainstream,
specifically, learning disabled students (Mori, 1980).
As a, result, few of these students are fortunate
enough to receive any structured career planning
(Biller, 1985).
Guidance counselors provide much of the available
career counseling tn high,school students. Their work
often focuses on scheduling classes and matching
students' to the best post-high school training programs.
Use of computerized career information programs
(Harris -Bowlsbey, 1984) has exted counselors in the
4

Carder Exploration 4
provision of career services. Yet the counselors
tools and the typical strategies they provide may not
be best suited for the learning disabled student.. In
order to identify the career planning needs of this
student, a number of factors should be considered.
First, the term "learning disability" may
indicate a wide range of learning difficulties which
are the result of weak selective attention skills' and
related characteristics such as hyperactivity,
distractibility, perseveration, and impulsivity (Ross,
1976). Choice of tools and strategies must be based
on the particular student's perceptual strengths and
weaknesses. For example, employing an interest
inventory which relies heavily on reading skills may
prove disasterous for a dyslexic student.
Second, guidance counselors, as well as school
systems, may assume that the special services
department should provide all educational services to
classified students. may result in special
education and resource room teachers bearing, the
burden of providing both academic training and career
counseling to these students.
Third, the self-esteem or self - concept, of
learning disabled children may be somewhat weaker than
that of other children (Ross, 1976). Bryan (1977)
revealed that learning disabled children tend to
receive more negative evaluations and experience more
negative social interactions than non-learning
disabled children. Self-esteem is a critical
component in the development of a self-concept.
5

Self-concept is key to the development of vocational
maturity (Super, 1983). Thus, for learhing disabled
students, addressing self - esteem issues may be a
significantly crucial factor of any vocational
guidance service.
The program desctibed below attempted to address
the above career concerns and needs of learning
disabled high school students. Specifically, a nine
session career exploration program was adopted by a
central New Jersey high school. The program was
entered into the curriculum of junior and senior high
school students identified as "perceptually impaired"
and attending "resource room" classes.
The program_included exercises and homework
focusing on self-esteem, interests, decision-taking:
skills, values clarification, knowledge of the World
of Work, and exploring occupations. Also integrated
into the program was a computerized career guidance
tool, DISCOVER (ACT, 1987).
The integration of career program, for a special
population, into existing guidance and special services
was promoted. Both Directors of Special Services And
Guidance Departments acknowledged the need of such career
programs. The Directors looked forward to the
cooperation of both departments, of guidance counselors
and special education teachers working together to serve
this population. The Directors hoped that such a program
would encourage greater involvement Of guidance
counselors in serving learning disabled students.
Thus, this study was executed and is presented
6

here as an exploration, as a look At what might or
might not,be effective in' a public-high school career
education program fok learning disabled students.
Specifically, the following variables were
examined: (1) how the program impadted (a) student's
self-esteem, (b) career indecigion, (c). congruence
(degree of correlation between a student's choice of
occupation and results on a career assessment tool),
(d) degree of differentiation (degree to which a
student exhibits Specific, clearly identified
interests and skills), and (e) the number of
identified job possibilities; (2) whether or not the
prograk was considered of benefit or usefulness to
students and faculty; (3) ho* such a program might
fit into the system of a public high school's
guidance and special education departments.
A research design was employed which simply
compared treatment and control groups after the
administration of the program to the treatment, roup
only. This research design although frought with.
Many threats to validity (Cook & Campbell, 1979) was
chosen as it appeared to be practical, feasible, and
least invasive, considering this particular field
setting.
Method
participants
The participants included thirty-two randomly
chosen eleventh and twelfth grade high,school
students identified as perceptually impaired. They
were attending the Lawrence High SchoOl in

Lawrenceville, New Jersey in the Fall of 1987. The
group was randomly divided into treatment and
control groups, each containing eighteen students.
Mean grade point averages (GPA'S-) of the two
groups, were comparable (Treatment = 1.65';
Control = 1.86, based on a 4.0 scale; t(27) = .56
p>.35). Most recent available achievement scores
of the Comprehensive 'Test of Basic Skills revealed no
significant .differences between the groups in the
areas ofreading, t(27) = 1.98,, ip.05, language,
t(27) = 1.08, g>.05, and math,
t (27) = .02, Al2.05.
Four guidande counselors, and four resource room
teachers participated in the implementation of
the program. These faculty members described the
students as having weak reading skills, exhibiting
behavioral difficulties, and lacking greater motivation
than the nonexceptional eleventh and twelfth graders.
Materials
Counselors and resource room teachers received a
manual entitled, Career Exploration ur thl Resource Room
,;Appendix A) which outlined the entire program. These
faculty members were also given notebooks in which to
keep personal logs of the class sessions, of guidance
use, and of computer use. Students received folders
in which they maintained their class handouts, notes, and
computer printouts.
DISCOVER, a computer -based career planning
system. (ACT, 1987) was employed throughout the program
and ,used diming classes as well as on an individual

basis. Although, students were encouraged to explore
DISCOVER as they wished,, specific modules were reviewed,
including: "1-Beginning the Career Journey", "2-Knowing
About the World of Work", "3-Knowing About Yourself",
"4-Knowing About Occupations to Explore", "5-Knowing
About Occupations"', and "6-Making Decisions About
Education".
Once the treatment group completed the program,
these students, teachers and guidance counselors
were asked to complete a general program ,evaluation
(Appendices B & C). Student Program Evaluations were
Written in simple language to facilitate easy reading.
Also at that time, all treatment and control group
students completed: (1) the Self Directed Search (SDS)
(Form E) (Holland, 1985), a vocational counseling tool
which assesses an individual's personal and job-related
interests, competencies; and perceived abilities.
The SDS form E provides an indiVidual with a 2 letter
occupational code. This code is-based on Holland's
model which categorizes all occupations into one,or
more of six categories: R(realistic),
I(investigative), A(artistic), S(social),
E(enterprising), and C(conventional). Form E provides
an easier reading level than the standard form;
(2) the Career Decision Scale (CDS) (Osipow, 1987),
an-inventory which measures indecision about one's career
path; and (3) the Culture-Free Self-Esteem Inventory
(SEI) (Form AD) (Battle, 1981), which assesses, levels of
self-reported self-esteem.
Procedure
9

Prior to the implementation of the program, the
project coordinator, counselors, and teachers met twice
formally for the purpose of introduction, orientation,
and training. At these meetings, roles were discussed,
materials were reviewed, and DISCOVER was presented and
demonstrated. These faculty members were requested to
practice accessing the DISCOVER system and familiarize
themselves with its use prior to the program
implementation. The Manual outlining the class sessions
(Appendix,A) was discussed in detail.
Counselors were notified that they were to meet
individually with students at least twice during the
program, after Session 5 and between Sessions 8 and 9.
They were also asked to give career library tours and
be present during Session 3. Teachers were asked to
present the program on at least a weekly basis during
scheduled class time. They were also reminded to
present the program only to>treatment,group students.
The project coordinator distributed her work and
home phone numbers encouraging faculty to call with
feedback, questions, and consultation. The coordinator
also met with faculty and the Director of Guidance both
fcrma4y and informally throughout the program.
Control group students were informed that they would
be participating in the program after it had been
completed by the first group of studefits. Data selection
was scheduled to occur during the ninth session. After
the tredtment group completed the program and data were
collected by the teachers, the program and DISCOVER were
offered to the control group.
10

-Career Exploration 10
Results and Discussion
According to teachers and guidance counselors,
program implementation and data collection for a number
of students proved difficult. Reasons included, high
absenteeism, non-compliance, And student transfers,, to
other school districts. One student dropped out of
school temporarily to serve time in jail. As a result,
complete data was available for only twenty-five of the
thirty-six students comprising both treatment and control
groups.
Due to small sample sizes and the inconsistent data
collection (some students completed the SDS but not the
CDS and vice-versa), use of statistical analysis was
questionable. Nevertheless, descriptive data were
reviewed for possible trends with the above reservations
in mind.
Each teacher incorporated the program into the
weekly curriculum in her own way. Generally, one to two
sessions were covered every week during class periodi.
Due to high absenteeism in this group of students,
teachers attempted to present material to absent students
on an individual basis.
Mean scores of the treatment group and control
groups were calculated. Table 1 presents the means
Insert Table .1 about here
derived from available data and consequently.- different
sample Sizes.
TWo variables appear of interest, congruence
11

and number of jobs the students considered exploring.
Congruence is the extent to which an individual's original
occupational choice is'consistent with his/her occupational
score on the SDS. For example, an individual may state that
he wants to become a social worker, an occupation which is
primarily "social" in nature. Yet, on the SDS Form E, his
two letter occupational code is clearly "RA", "realistic"
and "artistic". In this case, the degree of congruence is
low.
The SDS Menial (Holland, 1985) demonstrates how a
numerical value can be computed resulting in a
congruence score. The Iachian Index was employed with
only two letters, as opposed to the standard three
letters; as Form E resulted in two letter codes.
Table 1 reveals that the control group with a lower
n evidenced what seemed to be a visibly, greater degree
of congruence than the treatment group. Using the two
letter code, the congruence score displays a possible
range of 0 to 20. Here, the control group mean of 17
was the closest to the upper limit of 20-. One may
speculate why those who had not yet participated in the
program exhibited a more congruent mean score. The SDS
is a self-administered tool based, primarily one
self-perceptions. Could the Program have changed the way
the treatment group students perceived themselves, thus
promoting less congruence between self-perceptions and
what students had always-thought they would do?
A case in point was noted by a teacher and a
counselor. They each described how one male student had
always planned to work in construction. Yet, to his
12

surprise, his classroom career exploration and
use of DISCOVER resulted in an assessment of values and
interests that led to other avenues of work. Perhaps
this program served to challenge students' perceptions
and expectations.
On the average, treatment stddents considered
exploring more jobs than control group students. It
may be that the program provided more career information
and job possibilities to the program participants than
available to the other learning disabled students.
The program did not appear to have much of
an impact on self-esteem, career certainty, or
differentiation, as determined by the SDS code.
Thus, treatment group students felt no more
confident in themselves than control group
students. This is not surprising as self-esteem is
multidetermined. A short, one-time career
program may result in little or no change in
self-esteem. Treatment students seemed no- more
certain about their career paths than controls.
Finally, both groups displayed almost equal
levels of differentiation, indicating that there was
almost no difference in the degree to which all the
students exhibited specific, clearly identifiable
interests and skills. Perhaps a continuous program of
career exploration integrated throughout the high school
curriculum might have a greater impact on these areas.
Students were also assessed as to their perceived
need for career intervention or assessment as measured
by the CDS. Table 2 reveals that 3 out of 12 treatment
13

Insert Table 2 about here .
students felt little need for further intervention
compared to 0 out of 13 of the controls. None of the
treatment students indicated a high likelihood of need
for intervention whereas one of the control students did.
These data, although based on a restricted sample, may
support a trend which demonstrates that the program
helped meet a need for career exploration.
Only nine student program evaluations were collected
by teachers. Mean ratings are displayed in Table 3.
On a scale of one to five, where 1 = not at all and
Insert'Table 3 about here
5 = a lot, students revealed that they tended to enjoy
the career classes. Working with DISCOVER was perceived
as almost average in terms of enjoyment. Overall,
students rated the amount they learned about careers
(Item #3) about average, indicating they appeared to
acquire new knowledge. They further indicated that
they felt they received some help from the career
program. They also tended to recommend that other
students have a chance to participate in the program.
Student written comments revealed that the greatest
benefit of the program was gaining information about the
variety of occupations and about specific jobs. One
individual felt the program could have been condensed.
Another found the computer "confusing". This may well
14

have been a result of reading difficulties.
Counselor evaluations and logs communicated some
interesting findings. Only three of the four counselors
returned their evaluations and logs. Of the 18 students
in the treatment group, only seven ever met with
a counselor. Three of these students met only once with
a counselor. The program had been designed so that
students would meet with their counselors individually on
at least two occasions.
According to logs and counselor/teacher interviews,
little consultation occurred between teacher and
counselor. Counselors did not visit classes or give
career library tours as instructed at the orientation
and as documented in Sessions 3 and 6.
Meetings with counselors during the program revealed
frustration with students for not attending scheduled
appointments. They also communicated their feelings of
being overworked and burdened with deadlines for student
college applications.
One counselor wrote, "I don't think the special
education population was a good one to use." Another
repeatedly referred to DISCOVER as DISCOVERY, revealing
an obvious unfamiliarity with the guidance system.
In contrast, teachers appeared to carry the
program. They also echoed the counselors' frustrations,
indicating that it was generally difficult getting this
group motivated, compliant, and in attendance for any
school subject.
Overall, teachers tended to rate the program more
highly on the teacher/counselor program evaluations
15

(Table 4). Ratings for teachers averaged 3 and above
Insert Table 4 about here
for all items. Counselors exhibited average item ratings
of 3 and below.
Teachers recommended condensing the program to a two
or three day intensive workshop with no interruptions,
thus allowing these students, to focus their attention
without the distraction of other classes, holiday breaks,
and multiple absences. The teachers also thought that
such a workshop might provide more individualized
interactions with teachers.
The teachers noted that the use of DISCOVER
should be better tailored to meet individual student
needs. For some students, the reading level was too
difficult. Most needed much direction while using it.
Yet some felt quite comfortable at the computer and
couldn't wait to use it.
With respect to specific exercises utilized in this
career exploration program, teachers noted that the
values auction, decision- making skills, and coat of arms
exercises tended to be well-received (See Appendix A).
The values, action in particular seemed to challenge
students toward more realistic expectations about their
futures. Students also expressed their enjoyment of
the Self-Directed Search which was part of the data
collection.
Impressions and Conclusion
As so aptly phrased by Chubson (1985), "At this
16

time, career exploration, guidance, and counseling for
children with disabilities is as1641phan art as it is a-
science (p. 49)-" Career development tneoryi has, for the
most partd'been based on the nondiiabled population
(Conte, 1983). Consequently, adapting such theory and
associated knowledge to any disabled population may often
result in a hit or miss state- of affairs.
The present study was an attempt to further our
knowledge and experience in this area as well as to
provide career services to a specific disabled
population in a public school setting. It revealed-the
difficulties of implementing a new program in a field
setting. Significant factors often affecting outcome, in
this case counselor participation, teacher- data gathering
techniques, school schedules, and student absenteeism,
were often beyond the control of the researcher.
Importantly, we must be reminded that the data
collected here and the observations made in the present
study are based on a small sample of students, teachers,
and counselors, in one school. Furtheimore, the
particular research design (post-test only
measurement) employed and its accompanying
threats to validity must be seriously considered
when examining any possible between group
differences. Thus, one must be cautious in making
generalizations to other populations and educational
settings.
Nevertheless, a number of comments made by teachers
and students supported the value-of repeating such a
program. Teachers unanimously remarked that having

presented the program for the first time, they were
now better prepared and more confident to present it to
future students. Repeatedly emphasized was the
observation that what was effective for one student may
not have been for another. Whereas one teacher reported
that her students experienced difficulties understanding
DISCOVER because of their weak language skills, another
stated that DISCOVER was greeted with much enthusiasm.
Overall, teachers expressed interest in learning new
techniques and strategies to reach their students. For
these teachers, the program offered the opportunity to
acquire a variety of new tools which they could
selectively access and tailor to meet their students'
career needs.
Student reactions to the program may not have been
all too different from their reaction to any other newly
presented educational project. Yet it appe:ars that
students who participated increased their knowledge base
of occupations and were beginning to consider more job
possibilities. They may have felt less needy in their
career concerns than those students who had not yet
participated. They tended to rate the program
positively and recommend its use for other students.
Specific program exercises, such as the values auction,
were well received. Student expectations and perceptions
were challenged. Midprogram, one teacher wrote, "When
the students work with the computer and have to identify
their strengths and weaknesses..-.there is a lot of denial
on their part."
It was further recognized that many of the learning
-18

disabled students were expected to be safely taken-under
the wing of their family businessei. Thus, career
exploration served to present possibilities where few had
been previously considered. Perhaps this is why the
treatment group students appeared pOsSibly less congruent
thap their control group counterparts. A similar result
was documented by Rosenthal (1985).in a' career
deveippment program for learning disabled college
students. He noted that as a result of the program,
students were- less likely to be influenced by faiily F.nd
peer pressures.
A critical observation, hoWeVerl-concerned.the roles
Of the guidance:Counselors and teachers in the career
education of this special population. Understandably,
the resource room teachers felt-most comfortable ,with
-their Students-and were most likely better. able to cope
with and accept the frustration Of serving them. Perhaps
these teachers-dte more realistic in their expectations
than the guidance counselors who have had relatively
little experience with these students.
Chuben (1985) has-noted how guidance counselors have
typically lacked the competence to serve this group. In
this study, counselors' minimal participation may have
been_a function of such a lack in competence.
Furthermore, the counselors' expectations may have been
unrealistic. Although they seemed to know that this
group exhibits high absenteeism and noncompliance, they
continued to interact with them as they would with other
students. For example, when students were abtent for
appointments,- they did not actively seek-them or even
19

visit their classes for follow-up. They also openly
asserted to the project coordinator that they did not
want to be expected to do so.
Learning disabled students experiende multiple
failures in school. It is not uncommon for them to
exhibit accompanying behavioral and emotional
difficulties, especially during the adolescent years
(Santrock, 1986). Self-esteem levels are often quite
low. Counselors may need to alter their approach in
order to reach these students: Perhaps one cannot expect
these studentsto respond like other counseleei.
Counselors would do well to take a more active, direct
approach, coma out of their offices and join special
education teachers and their students in -the classrook.
Greater Consultation efforts-must occur between
these two groups of school personnel. Such efforts
would promote the spirit of thiiederal legislation of
P.L. 94-142 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Such programs might help(1) introduce counselors to
the special needd of such students, (2) emphasize an
active, direct. approach, (3) encourage consultation, (4)
provide counselors with specific career tools and
strategies, and (5) educate counselors about their role
as adVocates for the welfare of disabled individuals.
Future efforts might well focus on developing programs to
prepare counselors for career exploration with the
learning disabled.
20

References
American College Testing Program (1987). Discover.
Hunt Valley, Maryland.
Battle, J. (1981). Culture-tree self-esteem inventory.
Seattle, Wash.: Special Child Publications.
Biller, E.F. (1985). Understanding Ana guiding thl
career development gf adolescents Ana young adults
with learning disabilities. Springfield, Illinois:
Charles C. Thomas.
Bryan, T.H. (1977). Learning disabled children's
comprehension of nonverbal communication. Journal
gf, Learning Disabilities. jQ (8), 501-506.
Carney, C.G. & Wells, C.F. (1987).. Career Planning.
Monterey, California: ,Brooks/ColePublishing Co.
Chubon, R.A. (1985). Career-related needs of school
children, with severe physical disabilities. Journal
o Counseling and-Development, 64 (1), 47-50.
Conte, L.E. (1983). Vocational development theories and
the disabled person: Oversight or deliberate
omission. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulleten. 2.,
316-328.
Cook, T.D. & Caipbell, D.T. (1979). Ouasi-experimentation:
Lod= Ana analysis issues for field settings.
Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Harris-Bowlsbey, J. (1984). The computer and career
development. journal 9.1 Counseling And Development.
ga (3), 145-148.
Harris-Bowlsbey, J., Spivack, J.D., & Lisansky, R.S.
(1977). Personal life and career planning.
Towson, Md: Towson State University Counseling
21

.Career Exploration 21
Center.
Ho4and, J.L. (1985). Self - directed = search. Odessa,
Fla.: Psychalogical Assesspent Resources, Inc.
Mori, A.A. (1980).. Career education for the learning
disabled-where are we now? Learning Disabilities
Quarterly. 3 (1), 91-101.
Osipow, S.H. (1987). Career decision scale. Odessa,
Fla.: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Rosenthal, I. (1985). A career development program for
learning disabled college students. 2prnal of
Counseling And Development. ga (5), 308-310.
Ross, A.O. (1976)., Tsychological aspects 2f learning
disabilities And reading disorders. New York:
McGraw Hill.
Santrock, J.W. (1984). Adolescence. Dubuque, Iowa:
Wm. Brawn Publishers.
Super, D.E. (1983). Assessment in career guidance:
toward truly developmental counseling. Personnel
And Guidance Journal. §1 (9), 555-561.
22

'Footnotes
1This program was funded by an American Association
fok Counseling and Development Professional Enhancement
Grant. The use of DISCOVER was made possible for
this study free of charge, by the ACT Discover Center.
2
The author wishes to thank Terry Rosenthal,
Director of Special Services, Lawrence Township, NJ,
John Machulsky, Director of Guidance, Lawrence High
School, their personnel and students for their
cooperation and support.
23

Table 1
Summary 21 kean Scores g2r Treatment And Control Groups
Measure Treatment Control
SEI total score 25.60 (n=15) 25.40 =14)
CDS certainty 34.15 (n=13) 34.92 (n=14)
SDS
congruence 13 (n=12) 17 (a=10)
differentiation 19.15 (n=12) 19.38 (n=13)
# of jobs students 3.66 (n=13) 2.83 (n=12)
considered exploring
24

Table 2
perceived Need Igr Intervention gn og (n=25)
Treatment Control
Little felt need
for intervention
3 0
Further need for
assessment
9 11
High likelihood of
need for
intervention
0 1
Possible invalid
test data
0 1
n 12 1.3
25

Table 3
studeilt Emu= Valuation mun Ratinos (a=9)
Quest ionb Mean :Score
1. How much did you enjoy the 3.5
classes on careers?
2. How much did you enjoy working 2.8
with DISCOVER?
3. How much more, do you know 3.0
about careers as a result of
this program than before?
4. How much did the career 3.0
program help you?
5. Would you recommend that other 3.2
students have a chance to take
this program?
a. Ratings ranged from 0-5, 5 being the most
positive rating.
b. See Appendix B.
26

Table 4
Teacher/Counselor Program Evaluation Ratingsa
Counselorsc
Teachers
itemsb A B C A B C -D
1. overall value 2 3 2 3 3 4 4
of program
2. effectiveness 2 2 1 3 3 3 2
of DISCOVER
3. recommendation 2 2 1 3 3 2 1
for similar
students
4. program w/o 1 2 1 1 4 2 2
DISCOVERa
5. recommendation 3 4 2 3 3 4 4
for integration
into curriculum
6. student interest 2 1 4 4 3 3
in classes
7. student interest 2 2 2 2 3 3 3
in DISCOVER
a. Ratings ranged from 0-5, 5 being the most
positive rating (except for item #4, see
Appendix C).
b. See Appendix C.
c. Counselor D never returned evaluation.
27

Appendix A
CAREER EXPLORATION PROGRAM
for the
Resource Room
NOVEMBER - DECEMBER, 1987
Rosemarie Scolaro Moser, Ph.D.

Session 1
INTRODUCTION TO COURSE AND DISCOVER
1. Explain the idea of career exploration and the purpose of
this program: to think about and learn about career
possibilities. Not necessarily to find a job or make an
absolute decision.
2. Definitions:
JOB - a particular position you hole to earn money.
OCCUPATION - a field or area of work.
CAREER - the sum total of all your life experiences, work,
and nonwork.
3. Preent LIFE-CAREER RAINBOW.
Discuss the roles each of us occupies. Illustrate with
examples of friends, family.
4. Briefly present DISCOVER and encourage its use.
Take students through introduction.
5. Distribute folders in which to keep work.
HOMEWORK: Part or all of Module 1. Tell students they may or
may not wish to complete the CAREER JOURNEY.
29

Career Rainbow Sin wary Sheet
Son/Daughter Your relationship to your parents or guardians
and the time and energy spent in it.
Student The time and energy spent in education or
training at any time in your life.
Worker The time and energy spent in work for pay at
any time in your life.
Spouse Your relationship with your husband or wife and
the time and energy spent in it.
Homemaker The time and management spent in taking
responsibility for home maintenance and
management.
Parent Your relationship with your children and the
time and energy spent in it.
-Leisurite The time and energy spent in leisure
activities.
Citizen The time and energy spent in civic, school,
church, or political activities.
Annuitant ..... The role in which replaces iorker, that is, the
time in life when individuals receive social
security, pension, and/or other types of
retirement income.
*From Personal Life & Career Planning (Bowlsbey, et al. 1979).
30

CAREER DECISION-MAKING
1. Decision-Making Styles
Present Planful Decider
Agonizing Decider
Impulsive Decider
also Delaying
Discuss and employ all examples. Describe how this can
apply to all decisions, especially occupational.
2. Complete "Coat of Arms" exercise..
Discuss in class. May complete as homework.
31

PLANAR.
DECIDER
Career Exploration- 31
Identify
the decision
to be made
Gather
information
Identify
alternatives
Take
action
From Personal Life / Career planning (Bowlsbey et al. 1979).
32

MAUI%
DECIDER Career Exploration 32'
Review
decision
sad consegoonoto
From Personal Life i CareerPlannina (Bowlsbey et al. 1979).
33

IMPULSIVE
DECIDER Career Exploration 33
Choose
among
alternatives
From personal Life j Career Planning (Bowlsbey et al. 1979).
34

Directions for PERSONAL COAT OF ARMS
Long ago, families made personal coats of arms to identify
themselves to others. These coats of arms often showed some of
the family history and beliefs that were important to the
family.
In this exercise, you will'make your own coat of arms.
Attached to these directions is a blank coat of arms divided
into 6 parts. In parts 1 through 5, use only drawings to
express your thoughts. Follow the directions below.
Part 1: Make a drawing of one of the most important things
you've ever done.
Part 2: Make ,a drawing of one of the most important things your
-family has ever; done.
Part 3: Draw one or two things that people who care about you
say you should do for a living.
Part 4: Draw the thing you like most about yourself.
Part 5: Make a list of the tings you want most from.work.
Adapted from Carney & Wells, Career Planning (1987).
35

A Career Exploration Program For Learning Disabled High School Students

Career Explorationl 36
Session 3
WORLD OF WORK
1. Present World of Work Map.
Show 4 work task areas
12 regions
25 job families
2. Guide clais through Module 2 on DISCOVER:
3. Stress availability of Guidance Counselors to discuss career
exploration throughout this program.
HOMEWORK: Complete Module 2.
***Note: Recommend Guidance Counselors to be present for
introduction/presentation.

0
_JP
si~wel
Plasm
sk Woo Como bon
C. Novi Imo
vs Won
TUD WALD off* MOAK MAP
*Ain with
DATA
PO 3
S. roves Naives%
ssmapft
V. too
us
X. to
04.04".
°Van
a. Good orb
80411440 isso
. Mow Ovovibee
t ave ashoon
olsoolo011
ammo
Misr. 4.. To $0400401
GPOOOs
C.moolAmboo4
Ikoosoom
0
2
tel. Num% sob
Ma
73 v. Mossios Gas sa
3 Goal Gowns
ti V. hole kavosowvo
2
4 sea
(10
WAIN sot
koota
vied;
1
4
MN
I-
&woof tot twos 60
Alsolaraosio-
I' II &Osamu
4.140w441.
0. woos/ . Ximoolomo t asoloo.
booms go""*"1119 11):
Colo w00. j.
e.
c
t osompoo ma Moo 0
loaroisos
4;r
i. Alevho Are
Wawa
lag witguatda.com/cmx.p210...0.41
WAS
From personal LifeA Career planning (Bowisbey et al.. 179).
0
38 .BES EVALIMI jui."

Session 4
VALUES CLARIFICATION
LEARNING ABOUT YOURSELF
Values Auction Exercise
Each student is given $500.00. Bids begin at $50.00 with
minimum increase of $10.00.
Give students a few moments to plan their bidding strategies
and choose values before beginning the auction.
Discuss the results of exercises.
Did they get what they wanted?
What was most important for them?
Relate values to how one makes choices.
HOMEWORK: Begin Module 3.
39

Values Auction
You,have a total of $500.00 to bid for any or all of the
following "work values ". "Work values" are things which people
might think are important toihave in a job. Bidding begins at
$50.00. When you bid over someone, you must bid at least
$10.00 more than the last bid. The list of values is below.
Think about what might be important to you in a future job. To
help you plan your strategy, you may put a number "1" next to
the most important work value, a number "2" next to the second
most important, and so on. REMEMBER, you can only spend
$500.00.
1. AMOUNT OF PAY
2. FRIENDLY WORKERS
3. PRESTIGE is IMPORTANCE
4. BEI }G YOUR OWN BOSS
5. PLEASANT WORK ENVIRONMENT
6. JOB SECURITY - little or no chance of being fired
7. PAID VACATION TIME
40

Session 5
SELF-EXPLORATION
1. Discuss Module 3 results, printouts.
2. Assist with difficulties or questions.
3. Schedule guidance appointments.
HOMEWORK: Continue Module 3.

Session 6
FINDING OCCUPATIONS
1. Trip to Career Library.
2. Introduction-to Directory of Occupational Titles &
Occupational Outlook Handbook.
HOMEWORK: Begin Module 4.
42

Session 7
FINDING OCCUPATIONS (CONTID)
1. Discuss Module 4.
What occupations have students come across?
2. Have students choose at least 1 occupation to research and
present next time.
HOMEWORK: Research an occupation in Module 5 to present to
class.

Session 8
CLASS REPORTS & WRAP UP
1. Students describe researched occupations to class.
2. Schedule appointments with Guidance Counselors.
3. General discussion about where students are now, compared to
the beginning of the program, with respect to thinking about
their futures.
HOMEWORK: Explore Module 6 and/or any other modules.

Career Exploration 44-
Session 9
DATA COLLECTION
1. Testing of Treatment and Control Groups.
Program Questionnaire (Treatment only)
Career Indecision Scale
Culture-Free SEI
SDS
2. Collection of folders and logs.
3. Background data.on students. including
name
sex
grade
teacher
acle
birthdate
GPA
achievement scores
**This session must occur after second, scheduled guidance
appointment.
Control students must not use DISCOVER until after testing.

Appendix B
Name Teacher
Date
Circle one number for each question.
1. How much did you enjoy the classes-on careers?
1 2 3 4 5
/NOT AT ALL A LOT
2. How much did you enjoy working with DISCOVER?
1 2 3 4 5
/NOT AT ALL A LOT
3. How much more do you knbw about careers as a
result of this program than before?
1 2- 3 4 5
/NOTHING A LOT
4. HoW much did tie career program help you?
1
/NOT AT ALL
3 4 5
A LOT
5,. Would you recommend that other students have a
-chance to take this program?
1 2 3 4 5
,/NOT ALL DEFINITELY
6. What did you like most about the program?
7. What did you like least about the program?
8. How could this program be improved?
46

Appendix C
Teacher/Counselor-
Date
1. Overall, how would you rate the value of this career
exploration program?
1 2 4 5
/LOW VALUE
2. How effective was the use of DISCOVER
students?
1 2
.HIGH VALUE
with your
4 5
/NOT AT ALL
EFFECTIVE
EXTREMELY
EFFECTIVE
3. Would you recommend this program for similar students?
1 2 3 4 5
/DO NOT RECOMMEND
RECOMMEND HIGHLY
4.. To what degree do you think your students would have
benefitted from the individual use of DISCOVER without
classroom support?
1 .2 3 4 5
/WOULD NOT WOULD BENEFIT
BENEFIT HIGHLY
5. To what degree would you recommend that such a career
exploration program, with the use of computerized
guidance, become integrated in the standard educational
curribulum?
2 3 4 5
/VERY LOW VERY HIGH
DEGREE DEGREE
6. How interesting did your students find the career
classes?
1 2 3 4 5
/NOT AT ALL
INTERESTING
47
EXTREMELY
INTERESTING

Appendix C (cont'd)
7. How interesting did your students find DISCOVER?
1 2 3. 4 5
/NOT AT ALL EXTREMELY
INTERESTING INTERESTING
8. What did you like most about the program?
9. What did you like least about the program?
10. How could this program be improved?
48

A Career Exploration Program For Learning Disabled High School Students

More Related Content

Similar to A Career Exploration Program For Learning Disabled High School Students (20)

More from Scott Donald (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

A Career Exploration Program For Learning Disabled High School Students