A modification for copernicus kepler model

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
The Solar System Geometry (Part 5)
The Copernicus-Kepler Model Modification
By Gerges Francis Twadrous
2nd course student – Physics Department - physics & Math faculty –
peoples' friendship University – Moscow – Russia
gergesfrancis@yandex.ru /mrwahei1@yahoo.com /+201022532292
Abstract
The Copernicus-Kepler Model Modification:
1- The sun is on the vertical level relative to the Earth.
2- All solar planets are found on the horizontal level relative to the Earth
3- The Sun is higher than the Earth, and higher than all solar planets
4- The straight line from the Sun to the Earth is the main line in the solar
group
5- The planets revolve around this line, and not around the sun herself..
6- i.e. the Planets revolve around the line connected between the Sun and
the Earth…
7- That means when the planet revolve around the sun, he will revolve
around the Earth also because both of them connected by this same one
line
8- That's why, the Ptolemy model lived very long time, because it was
correct
9- So if the planet revolve around the sun or around the Earth the result
will be the same, because both of them contributed to create the main
line in the solar group
10- And because the sun is higher than the Earth, we see the sun hesitating
motion to forward and backward with angle 63.7 degrees yearly, as a
circle motion
11- So the sun circle motion is NOT true, but resulted from our wrong
vision for the sun motion…
12- I claim, the planets from the Earth to Pluto move toward the sun, but
Mercury and Venus move in the reverse direction
13- The Earth daily displacement toward the sun = 1 km
14- The previous modification can give us some explanation for the
Egyptian astronomical phenomenon 2737, in which Mercury, Venus and
Saturn were perpendicular on the Earth on 3/12/2012(on the Egyptian
pyramids heads-appendix No.1),
15- Which proves, that the planets Not only revolve around the sun but also
revolve around the Earth, supports this modification.
Keywords: Copernicus Kepler model- Sun nature – matter definition
S. Virgin Mary Assumption into Heaven.
Written in Cairo – Egypt
22nd
September 2017

I do this research
2nd
2
Planetary Fact Sheet - Metric
MERCU
RY
VEN
US
EART
H
MOO
N
MAR
S
JUPIT
ER
SATU
RN
URAN
US
NEPTU
NE
PLUT
O
Mass (1024
kg) 0.330 4.87 5.97 0.073 0.642 1898 568 86.8 102 0.0131
Diameter (km) 4879 12,104 12,756 3475 6792 142,984 120,536 51,118 49,528 2390
Density (kg/m3
) 5427 5243 5514 3340 3933 1326 687 1271 1638 1830
Gravity (m/s2
) 3.7 8.9 9.8 1.6 3.7 23.1 9.0 8.7 11.0 0.6
Escape
Velocity (km/s)
4.3 10.4 11.2 2.4 5.0 59.5 35.5 21.3 23.5 1.1
Rotation
Period (hours)
1407.6
-
5832.5
23.9 655.7 24.6 9.9 10.7 -17.2 16.1 -153.3
Length of
Day (hours)
4222.6 2802.0 24.0 708.7 24.7 9.9 10.7 17.2 16.1 153.3
Distance from
Sun (106
km)
57.9 108.2 149.6 0.384* 227.9 778.6 1433.5 2872.5 4495.1 5870.0
Perihelion (106
km)
46.0 107.5 147.1 0.363* 206.6 740.5 1352.6 2741.3 4444.5 4435.0
Aphelion (106
k
m)
69.8 108.9 152.1 0.406* 249.2 816.6 1514.5 3003.6 4545.7 7304.3
Orbital
Period (days)
88.0 224.7 365.2 27.3 687.0 4331 10,747 30,589 59,800 90,588
Orbital
Velocity (km/s)
47.4 35.0 29.8 1.0 24.1 13.1 9.7 6.8 5.4 4.7
Orbital
Inclination (deg
rees)
7.0 3.4 0.0 5.1 1.9 1.3 2.5 0.8 1.8 17.2
Orbital
Eccentricity
0.205 0.007 0.017 0.055 0.094 0.049 0.057 0.046 0.011 0.244
Axial
Tilt (degrees)
0.01 177.4 23.4 6.7 25.2 3.1 26.7 97.8 28.3 122.5
Mean
Temperature (
C)
167 464 15 -20 -65 -110 -140 -195 -200 -225
Surface
Pressure (bars)
0 92 1 0 0.01
Unknow
n*
Unknow
n*
Unknow
n*
Unknown
*
0
Number of
Moons
0 0 1 0 2 67 62 27 14 5
Ring System? No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Global
Magnetic Field?
Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Unkno
wn
MERCU
RY
VEN
US
EART
H
MOO
N
MAR
S
JUPIT
ER
SATU
RN
URAN
US
NEPTU
NE
PLUT
O
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/

I do this research
2nd
3
Contents
Subject Page No.
Abstract 1
Planetary Fact Sheet - Metric 2
Contents 3
1- Introduction 4
2- Research Methodology 6
3- The Relationship between the Planet diameter and his orbital
distance
8
3-1 the planet diameter and orbital distance 8
3-2 The Discussion 9
3-3 The Multiple Relationships 10
3-4 The Solar Group Two Heads 12
4- The Matter definition 13
4-1 The Planets Diameters Relationships 14
4-2 The Solar Group Mass Distribution 15
4-3- The Sun Gravity 16
4-4 The Matter Creation 17
5- The Copernicus – Kepler Model Modification 19
5-1 The Light is produced by Earth motion 19
5-2 How the Sun velocity = 1/366 times Earth velocity? 22
5-3 The Copernicus – Kepler Model Modification 23
(The image which describes the new solar system model is mine,
I created it)
Appendix No. 1 The Planets alignment in December 2012 25
Author Curriculum Vitae 34
The Author Other Papers 40

I do this research
2nd
4
1- Introduction
In my previous paper
"the Earth moves with the light velocity relative to the sun"
http://vixra.org/abs/1709.0331
I claimed that the sun light which we see daily is produced by the Earth motion,
where the earth transforms her motion mechanical waves into light waves
producing the light beams, based on a different rate of time.
These light beams travel and reflect on the sun because the sun is just a mirror.
Also I explained that, the Earth motion (Earth loaded velocity)= all solar
planets daily velocities total divided by a different rate of time
Please review my previous paper for full details
This paper argument.
There are 3 questions we need to discuss
1st
question
Based on this new description of the solar group, do we need to modify
Copernicus Kepler Model?…
And the answer yes, and the modification will be discussed in Point No. 5 of
this paper..
2nd
question
"How that can be possible"?
How such great gape can be found between what we know about the solar
system and what's his truth?
This problem is resulted from the wrong vision
We see wrongly the solar system geometrical description!
As Einstein learnt us, the particle curve or straight trajectory depends on the
observer situation, means the direct observation is not enough to define the
particle trajectory, but we need to analyze each particle motion to see its truth
trajectory explanation…
Let's consider one example to explain,
What's the darkness? Someone said it's the absence of light!
No light = darkness!
Is it true?
What we have learnt from Young Experiment (double slit Experiment)
The light coherence can produce bright and Dark fringes (spots)..
So the darkness can be produced by the light coherence….
This information is told even by Newton before….
But
Can we claim that all darkness around us is found by the light coherence or
there's another way to create the darkness?
I'm trying to explain that, The Wrong Vision Is Our Problem

I do this research
2nd
5
3rd
question:
What's the main mistake in our vision?
…………It's the matter definition………..
What's the matter? How it's created? Why the matter is created?
The matter is created by some mystery, without any known measurements or
procedures!
Let's study the moon diameter … as example
What's the moon diameter ? a distance = 3475 km !
A distance made of rocks or land, hard and can't change easily…!!
As we see we know very little about the matter!
And if we study the moon diameter alone we will reach to the distance 3475
km only… nothing is distinguished here!
But let's look at the following:
diameterMoon
cedismoonEarth
diameterEarth
diameterSunthe
diameterSunthe
cedisorbitalEarth







 tantan
(Eq. 1)
The previous equation is he reason, why the people one Earth sees the moon
disc = the sun disc (spite in fact the sun diameter = 400 moon diameter)
That enables the total solar eclipse to be occurred…
Spite of that, no geometrical reason behind!
Let's see another equation
periodorbitalMars
periodorbitalEarth
cedisMarsEarth
cedisorbitalEarth
diameterMoon
diameterMars
diameterMars
diameterEarth











tan
tan
(Eq.2)
The previous equation tells us new information about the planet diameter
generally.
The Planet Diameter Is A Rate Between 2 Values
The hard planet diameter is just outer feature, but the inner planet diameter is a
rate between 2 values!
The Matter Is A Rate
(The Research Hypothesis)
Now we have new information
- The Motion is A relative and no meaning for "the absolute motion"
And
- The Matter is A rate between 2 values and no matter is independent
Actually the Matter is A rate is our basic argument in this paper…
- Point No. 3 discuss the Relationship between the Planet diameter and his
orbital distance
- Point No. 4 discuss the Matter definition and Creation
- Point No. 5 the Copernicus Kepler model modification.

I do this research
2nd
6
2- Research Methodology
I use the Solar planets data analyze to understand the solar system geometry…
My argument is …
Based on the planet data analysis we'll see the planet motions from different
perspective which change our vision toward the solar system geometry…
Let's discuss one example to explain…
The Moon Orbital Cycle
We know the moon revolves around the Earth once each 27.3 days (moon
orbital period)… So the current theories tell us that the moon moves daily
around 88000 km to complete his orbit (2.41 million km) in 27.3 days…
Let's me provide another description for this same Moon Cycle, by using the
planets data analysis provided that…
- No physics Law I'll violate
- The final observatory motion I'll perform
So, I provide another theory for this same moon Cycle & Motion, and I follow
the same rules and produce same motion…. Why my theory is mistaken?
Let's see this theory as following
My Theory for the Moon orbital period (27.3 days)
The moon apogee radius = 406000 km
The lunar apogee circumference = 2.58 million km (mkm)
Earth rotates daily around her axis with all this circumference (supposition)
i.e.
Earth rotates daily holding with her the moon orbit!
That means the moon orbit rotates with the Earth daily around the Earth
Axis complete rotation (360 degrees)
Let's see that deeply:
- The outer line of the moon apogee orbit radius 406000 km is the base
line of the Earth motion, the Earth uses this line as a road to walk on it.
- The Earth body connected with the moon orbit completely as her own
body and the Earth moves with this orbit as her vehicle
- The Earth rotates the Moon orbit on the outer line till the moon orbit
rotates completely (360 degrees) and at this point the Earth daily
rotation be completed.
- For that reason the moon orbit circumference = the Earth
motion distance daily.
So, why the moon himself doesn't rotates with the Earth daily?! If his orbit
rotates completely with the Earth daily rotation?!
- The Moon himself rotates completely in the opposite
direction to his orbit motion, and for that the moon
doesn't be taken in his orbit motion with the Earth

I do this research
2nd
7
- The Moon rotates his orbit completely daily, and just because the Moon
rotates in the opposite direction of his orbit motion direction, the moon
has the ability to catch his position in the sky, otherwise he would be
taken by his orbit rotation with the Earth..
- The Moon can't move always with the apogee orbit radius (406000 km)
for that reason his total distance daily is not equal the Earth motion, but
only 2.41 m km that because the moon rotates with the average orbit and
not the apogee orbit
- The apogee orbit motion with the Earth = 2.58 mkm but the moon
motion in the opposite direction = 2.41 mkm, So the difference is 0.17
mkm, which causes The Daily Actual Displacement For The Moon…
- The Actual Moon Displacement Daily Is 88000 km, which equal 1/2
of the velocities difference. That because the opposite directions of the
motions causes friction for the moon pulling process by his obit velocity,
resulting an actual distance = 1/2 the velocities difference.
This simple explanation gives us some answer for the question
Why the moon orbit apogee circumference = The Earth daily motion distance?
i.e.
Why The moon apogee radius = 1/366 of the earth orbital distance?!
Note please/
The Moon orbit motion is known fact, where Metonic Cycle is based on it, So I
don't create motion for the moon orbit, I just use the facts.
So, the research methodology can be summarized in following:
1- I use NASA Planetary Fact Sheet – Metric – found in page No. 2 of my
paper with its link.
2- The solar planets data are my treasure, I depend on them completely..
3- No previous concepts I believe in, just I try to reach The Suitable
Geometrical Structure Of The Solar Group, through this process we
may support concepts or disprove others, that depends on the final solar
geometrical structure.
4- I suggest ideas and extend my thinking with Each Relationship
Contains Only Solar Planet Data, and these suggested ideas will be in
waiting to find more support.
5- I accept only The Supported Meaningful ideas and gather them
together to form the general solar system Geometry…

I do this research
2nd
8
3- The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
Because
"Matter Is A Rate"
We can easily conclude such relationship to be exist … so let's try to prove that
3-1 the planet diameter and orbital distance
This relationship is suggested by the eclipse equation, let's remember it here
diameterMoon
cedismoonEarth
diameterEarth
diameterSunthe
diameterSunthe
cedisrbitalEarth







 tantan
(Eq. 1)
Because of this equation we see the sun disc = the moon disc, spite in real the
sun diameter = 400 times the moon diameter!
The equation tells us that,
The diameters rate = the distances rate!
So, the idea was easy to be suggested, that there's some relationship between
the planet diameter and his orbital distance….
Actually I have already equation expresses this relationship
"Gerges Francis Tawdrous Equation"
D = R x (109)2
x Пn
Where
D: is the distance between the planet to the sun or to another planet
R : is the planet diameter or radius
n=0 for planets (Mercury – Earth- Mars- Saturn-Jupiter- Pluto-Neptune)
n=2 for planets ( Venus – Uranus)
one exception: Neptune uses (109)3
let's see to what extent this is accurate..
Table No. 1
"The Planet diameter & orbital distance relationship"
The Relationship Error
Group
I
Mercury orbital distance = Mercury diameter x (109)2
-
Earth orbital distance = Earth diameter x (109)2
1.3%
Saturn orbital distance = Saturn diameter x (109)2
-
Mars- Earth distance = Mars diameter x (109)2
3%
Jupiter– Mars circumference = Jupiter diameter x (109)2
1.8%
Group
II
Venus orbital circumference = Venus radius x П2
x (109)2
4.4%
Uranus –Pluto orbital = Uranus radius x П2
x (109)2
-
Pluto orbital distance = Neptune diameter x П2
x (109)2
1%
GroupIII Neptune –Saturn distance = Pluto diameter x (109)2
1.1%

I do this research
2nd
9
3-2 The Discussion
The equation is Not completely consistent…
But is the concept saved from the Equation problems we faced?
The Equation defines
- The planet position in the solar group
- Depends almost only on the planet diameter & (109)2
That tells us the concept is saved but the equation is inconsistent!
So why? If the relationship is found in truth, why the equation is inconsistent?
There are 2 reason for that let's provide them here
1. The Multiple Relationships
2. The Solar Group 2 Heads
Let's discuss them in following

I do this research
2nd
10
3-3 The Multiple Relationships
We now know that
"Matter Is A Rate"
So
The moon diameter is a rate between his orbital distance from perigee to
apogee and the Earth orbital distance…
3475 km (moon diameter) x 43000 km ( moon orbital distance from
perigee –apogee) = 149.6 mkm (Earth orbital distance)
The previous equation confirms this meaning!
But the moon diameter isn't only that!!
Table No. 2
The Moon diameter is a Rate between many players
The value Error
Moon diameter x Venus diameter = Venus – Earth distance 1.6%
Moon diameter x Jupiter circumference = Jupiter orbital diameter -
Moon diameter x the sun diameter = Jupiter orbital circumference 1.1%
Moon circumference x Mars circumference = Mars orbital distance 2.2%
I want to say …
I- The Matter is A Rate
II- A Rate between many players in the same time
So, when the Matter is found, there are many several relationships found with
this same matter creation because this same matter is the same Rate between all
these relationships players…
So the Moon diameter is a rate between many players in the same time
That's why the data direction isn't clear..
because many relationship support the same concept but the original
relationship point is hidden under many other relationships.
So we may conclude that all planets are components in one machine which is
the solar group, each planet does a task integrating with the other's to perofm
the same one general job
Before to discuss the second & most important reason, we need to discover one
great surprise…

I do this research
2nd
11
The Venus diameter = (109)2
! (error 1.8%)
That also supports the claim "the Matter is a rate"
That enable me to define Any planet orbital distance by the following
interesting equation
(Gerges Francis Equation)
D= AR2
v Пn
Where
D= the planet distance to the sun or to another planet
A= constant
Rv= Venus diameter
Let's see that in following
Table No. 3
Constant *Πn
The distance Error
(Venus
diameter)2
* Π0
149.6 mkm Earth orbital distance 2%
* Π 455.8 m km Mars Orbital diameter -
* Π2
1433.5 mkm Saturn Orbital distance -
* Π2
/2 720.3 mkm Mercury Jupiter distance -
* Π2
*2 Uranus orbital distance -
* Π2
*4 Pluto orbital distance 1.4%
* Π3
Neptune orbital distance 1.1%
* Π-1
*2 Earth Mercury distance 2%
* Π-2
*4 Mercury orbital distance 2.5%
* Π-2
*8 Venus Mars distance -
Note please
(-) means the error less than 1%
Table No. 3 discussion
Venus diameter Equation supports our claim that, the solar planets are
depended on each other …
I may claim that the solar group is one machine, each planet is a component in
this same machine…
That's why the Equation was inconsistent, because many relationships support
the same concept but the original point still hidden under others….
And How can we reach to the consistent equation?
Let's try to do that
While we discuss the second reason (the most important one).

I do this research
2nd
12
3-4 – The Solar Group Two Heads
I- Earth Followers
cedisEarthMarth
diameterMars
cedisorbitalSaturn
diameterSaturn
cedisorbitalMercury
diameterMercury
cedisorbitalEarth
diameterEarth
tantantantan 










ncecircumfereorbitalEarth
cedisPlutoJupiter
diameterPluto
diameterEarth




 tan
(Mars Equation error 3%- Pluto Equation error 1.3%- no more errors)
II- Sun Followers
cedisVenusSun
cedisOrbitalUranus
DiameterUranus
diameterSunthe
tan
tan





(error 2.5%)
cedisorbitalEarth
cedisMarsNeptune
DiameterNeptune
diameterSunthe
tan
tan





(error 1.5%)
cedisMarsEarth
cedisorbitalJupiter
DiameterJupiter
diameterSunthe
tan
tan





(error 2%)
cedisVenusMercury
cedisorbitalPluto
DiameterVenus
diameterSunthe
tan
tan





(error 1.5%)
cedisMoonEarth
cedisorbitalEarth
DiameterMoon
diameterSunthe
tan
tan





The Discussion
The previous equations tell us there are 2 categories in the solar group
Some planets follow the Earth (Mercury , Mars , Saturn and Pluto)!
and others follow the sun (Venus, Moon, Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune)!
So we understand now why the equation was inconsistent
Because The Solar System Description Is Incorrect
To describe the solar system correctly we need to put the sun as the Group
focus point (as the current description does)
But also
We need to put the Earth as a representative of the sun…
So We Have 2 Heads In The Solar Group
The Great head is the sun
The second one is the Earth….
Now we can see why we need to modify Copernicus-Kepler Model.
This modification we will study in details in point N. 5 of this paper.

I do this research
2nd
13
4- The Matter definition
Introduction
I need to reminder the respected reader always by our main conclusion and
hypothesis, that
- The Matter is a rate, and no matter is independent
- The Motion is relative and no meaning for "the absolute
motion"
And what means, the matter is a rate?
means,
because the Matter is found, so many relationships are found between the
planets different data…
the Matter is a rate between 2 values, may be 2 matter values or distances
values or others….
Because the solar planets matters are found, we know that the solar group is
one machine, each planet is a component in this same machine, they integrates
with each other and complete together the same one job…
For that reason, we understand that the matter found is considered the solar
planets geometrical relationships proof.
Based on this concept, we can easily found geometrical relationships between
the solar planets diameters! That disproves the current theory of the solar group
creation randomly from a big star explosion…
Because the geometrical relationships between the solar planets diameters
proved that the planets diameter are created mentioned geometrically and not
randomly.
Let's start with the geometrical relationships between the planets diameters
each other.

I do this research
2nd
14
4-1 The Planets Diameters Relationships
As we have seen the solar planets are related to each other strongly…
So, it's logical to find one Equation expresses any Planet diameter relating to
any other…
This also tells us, there's some coupling between the solar planets…
Let's see that in details
Gerges Francis Equation
diameterplanetanother
dameterPlanet
diameterNeptune
diameerUranus
n










Let's consider the left Term of Equation is = An
When
n =2
RadiusEarth
diameterMars
diameterVenus
diameterEarth
A





2
(error 1%, 0 resp.)
n= 3
diametervenus
ncecircumferemoon
ncecircumferePluto
diameterMars
diameterMars
RadiusVenus
A








3
(error 1.2% , 0 , 0 respectively)
n=5
diameterEarth
ncecircumfereMercury
diameterSaturn
diameterJupiter
A





5
(error 1.2%, 2.5% respectively)
The previous equations contain all solar planets in addition to the Earth moon
We can see the equation works easily…. Where max. error just (2.5%)
Note Please
Mercury Radius = Pluto diameter
Mars Radius = Moon diameter
The discussion
The previous equation tells us many information let's summarize them as
following:
1- The Solar Planets diameters are NOT created randomly, but created
connected to each other geometrically.
2- The Planets diameters geometrical relationships part of the whole solar
system Geometry…
3- No planet diameter is independent from the others

I do this research
2nd
15
4-2 The Solar Group Mass Distribution
Because "The Matter is A Rate" the Planet Mass is NOT a property of the
planet, but distributed by the Geometrical structure!! Please see the proof…
The solar group total mass distribution gives us new vision about the Mass
Let's see that as following…
 The solar group total mass = 2667 *1024
kg,
 This mass total is divided into 2 parts with rate 1: (3.66)2
= 200 :2467
 Value 2467 *1024
kg is divided with rate 3/10 (Saturn Mass/Jupiter mass)
 200 *1024
kg is into 2 equal parts 100 (Neptune Mass) + 100 (others mass)
 100*1024
kg is divided the total mass of (Uranus + Mercury + Venus +
Earth+ the moon + Pluto) this value is distribution according to the
following Equations..
MassMercury
MassVenus
MassEarth
MassUranus





(I)
)( ninclinatioorbitalMarsMassMercuryMassMars  (II)
)(100 ninclinatioorbitalmoonMassPluto
MassEarth
MassVenus
MassMoon 



 From this distribution, we found that,
The Earth Mass = (Mercury + Venus+ Moon +Mars) masses total
That means
massesotherswithuranus
MassNeptune
totalMassesplanets
MassEarth
)(4 




(III)
I found, that's very hard to distribute the solar group masses total by previous
explanation randomly!
Specially, we found the used rate (3.66)2
is the same rate we found between
many diameters
Also we found the moon orbital inclination used for the moon mass definition
(and Mars orbital inclination is used for Mars Mass)
The previous discussion gives us a clear vision, that the Particle Mass is NOT a
property of the particle,
Where
The Solar Planets Total Masses are Distributed According To The Whole
Solar Geometrical Structure And Not As Property For Each Planet!

I do this research
2nd
16
4-3 The Sun Gravity
Because "The Matter is A Rate" the Planet gravity depends on other Planets
gravity! And even the sun follows this same concept and equation!
I provide An Equation to define any planet gravity based on Earth gravity
Gerges Francis Equation
gravityEarth)
MassEarthThe
MassPlanetThe
()
DiameterPlanetThe
DiameterEarth
(gravityplanetThe 2

Let's use this equation to define the solar planets gravities & The Sun Gravity
The Planets Gravities Table
Planet Equation Resulted Registered Error
The Sun (Earth/Sun diameters rate)2
(Sun
Mass/ Earth Mass)* earth gravity
= (1/109)2
* 333000*9.8= 274
274 274 0
Moon (3.66)2
x (0.073 / 5.97) x 9.8 1.6 m/sec2
1.6 m/sec2
0
Mercury (2.61)2
x (0.23/5.97) x 9.8 3.7 m/sec2
3.7 m/sec2
0
Venus (1.0538)2
x 4.87 /5.97) x 9.8 8.9 m/sec2
8.9 m/sec2
0
Earth 9.8 9.8 9.8 0
Mars (1.878)2
x (0.642 / 5.97) x 9.8 3.7 m/sec2
3.7 m/sec2
0
Jupiter (0.0892)2
x (1898 / 5.97) x 9.8 24.7 m/sec2
23.1 m/sec2
6.9%
Saturn (0.10582)2
x (568/5.97) x 9.8 10.44 m/sec2
9 m/sec2
16%
Neptune (0.2575)2
x (102/ 5.97) x 9.8 11.1 m/sec2
11 m/sec2
0.9%
Pluto (6.97)2
(0.0131 / 5.97) x 9.8 1.04 m/sec2
1.1 m/sec2
5.4%
Note please: The Big errors caused by using of the squared values i.e. Saturn error
isn't 16% but just 4% and Jupiter error isn't 6.9% but just 2.6% .. etc)
The Table Comments:
A- Why The sun follows the same equation? If she is created independently
from the solar planets?
B- Why the gravity equation is working? If Each Planet Mass is
independent?

I do this research
2nd
17
4-4 The Matter Creation
the Matter is A Rate
How the Matter is created?
Einstein gave us an equation to change the mass value
2
2
2
1
c
v
m
m o


This interesting equation tells us the mass is changing with the higher
velocity…
To understand what's going on we need to concentrate our data and ideas as
following
1- If The Light beams are produced by Earth motion where the Earth
transforms her motion mechanical waves into light waves producing the
light beams. (planets total velocities based on Earth new rate of time).
Let's ask, why we don't see these light beams, but we see the
Earth As just matter?
2- Because The Earth moves with C velocity relative to the sun and we
move with the Earth by the same velocity…
i.e.
No difference in velocities are found between our and Earth motions
For that we see the Earth as matter only because there's no difference in
velocities between both.
But we see the sun as a source of light, spite the sun light is produced by
the Earth and not by the sun?
3- Because the Sun moves very slowly relative to the Earth with rate 1:366
for that reason the sun can emerged the light to us based on the
velocities difference.

I do this research
2nd
18
Can we define the Matter based on this explanation?
4- The reason to see the matter or the light is the velocities difference, this
idea we learnt from the Relativity theory.. the point here is the motion,
because the Earth and all planets move with c velocity, and so all of
them are matter relative to us because we also move with c velocity
relative to the sun, so we need a stationary point to produce the light …
Is there any real proof for this idea?
5- There are many, but one remarkable proof I discussed in the previous
paper (The Earth moves with light velocity relative to the sun) in sub-
point (No.5-4) in which I claimed that the Lorentz contraction
phenomenon is seen many time based on the sun angle 7.25 degrees.
Please Review this paper
Link /

I do this research
2nd
19
5- The Copernicus – Kepler Model Modification
5-1 The Light is produced by Earth motion
5-2 How the Sun velocity = 1/366 times Earth velocity?
5-3 The Copernicus – Kepler Model Modification
5-1 The Light is produced by Earth motion
In "the Earth moves with the light velocity relative to the sun"
this subject is discussed in full details, so here I refer to points only
We may remember
"Gerges Francis Tawdrous Equation"
2
4
4
1
CCC 
Where
 1/4 C : The planets velocities total relative to the sun
 4C :The light high velocity I claimed is found behind the solar
group Geometry
Note Please: if this velocity is found that means, the
Relativity principle hypothesis was mistaken..
 C2
:The squared light Velocity (the sun light source and
Lorentz equation factor)
I wish the reader will review the previous paper for full details
I provided the following description to explain why I use all solar planets
velocities total …
All solar planets rotate in the same direction around the sun, that enable the
velocities addition easily.
Let's imagine the solar group is a big disc has many layers, and the sun is a
point in the center (or focus), where her motion is low relative to the solar
group motion.
Now let's imagine that, any layer motion in this group causes the whole disc to
move together ….
Let's see that deeply
When the Earth rotates one complete revolution around the sun, the whole disc
(the solar group) will rotate around the sun by her revolution, that means all the
solar group will revolve by the earth motion only..!
Now if the Earth and Mars rotate one revolution for each, so the whole group
will rotate 2 times.. i.e.

I do this research
2nd
20
If each planet rotates one revolution around the sun, So the whole group
together will revolve 9 times around the sun…
this is the imaginary description!
What we get in truth?
The planets velocities addition, can be a logical idea effective on the whole
group motion…
So let's perform the solar planets velocities additions in following
We use the solar planets velocities for one day
The planet Velocity per day
Mercury 4.095 million km /day
Venus 3.094 million km /day
Earth 2.57 million km /day
The Moon1
2.41 million km /day
Mars 2.082 million km /day
Jupiter 1.1318 million km /day
Saturn 0.838 million km /day
Uranus 0.5875 million km /day
Neptune 0.4665 million km /day
Pluto 0.40608 million km /day
Total 17.61 m km
So The Solar Planets Velocities Total Per Day = 17.61 mkm
Note/
In Research Methodology I explained How the moon daily motion = 2.41 mkm
5-1-1 A New Time Rate
10921 km (moon circumference) x 86400 second (solar day) = 943 m km
(943 million km = Earth orbital circumference)
and the conclusion is,
If the Earth rotates her complete revolution around the sun in one day only, The
Moon circumference will be 1 second distance of her motion!
And for whom such time?
For the sun!
We have 2 different times in the solar group..
The Earth time which we know perfectly
And the sun time
Where
1 Day Of The Sun Time = 1 Year Of The Earth Time
1
- The Moon here is The Earth- Moon, I never refer to any other moon in this paper

I do this research
2nd
21
New time rate..!
Let's see if it's useful for our velocities total
The solar planets velocities total = 17.6 million km / day
What's this velocity relative to the sun time?
1 sun day = 1 Earth year
237 seconds of sun time = 1 Earth day
Now we have a distance = 17.6 million km
And
A time = 237 seconds
What's the velocity?
V= d/t = 1/4 C (The Light Velocity)
So, what result we have?
The planets velocities total = 1/4 light velocity relative to the sun
5-1-2 The Light higher velocity 4 C (1.2 mkm)
I claimed in the previous paper
The solar planets group are created from the light,
where, the high light velocity 4C is the source from which the solar planets
group is created
the previous short explanation tells us that, the light is produced by the Earth
lorded Motion (Earth loaded velocity)
for full details please review

I do this research
2nd
22
5-2 How the Sun velocity = 1/366 times Earth velocity?
L
- In one year (365.25 days) the Earth rotates he complete revolution
around the sun, which is a distance = 940 million km
- Also in one year (365.25 days) the Sun rotates one time around here
axis, where the sun circumference = 4.37 million km
- But the rate between both = 97.214
374.4
3.940

- The previous rate 215 is not equal 366, So where is the equation error?
I- The Sun Circumference is contracted by percentage 7.25% because
of Lorentz contraction concept as we discussed in point No. 5-4 of
my paper (page No. 38), So the New sun circumference = 4.05688
mkm
II- The Sun doesn't rotate completely around her axis yearly, but moves
hesitating motion to forward and backward to maximum angle 63.7
degrees which equals the sun decline angle … So the sun motion
distance will be (63.7 * 4.05688)/100 = 2.57 million km, which
equals the Earth motions daily….
III- i.e. the Sun moves in one year a distance = a distance the Earth
moves in one day…. That's way the sun velocity = 1/366 of the
Earth velocity
The General Conclusion
The Earth moves with light velocity relative to the sun, transforming the
motion mechanical waves into light waves and producing the light
beams. These same light beams will be reflected on the sun, which we
see as the sun rays, because the sun herself is just a mirror…..
Note Please
Because the Sun is just a mirror, she can't rotate, so the sun truth motion
is the hesitating motion to forward and backward with angle 63.7 degrees
So the Sun doesn't rotate!
But
Why we see her rotate around her axis once yearly?
(because the sun gives the same face to the Earth along year)..
Let's answer this question in following.

I do this research
2nd
23
5-3 The Copernicus – Kepler Model Modification
This picture is mine,
I created it
S
E

I do this research
2nd
24
The Copernicus–Kepler Model Modification
1- The sun is on the vertical level relative to the Earth.
2- All solar planets are found on the horizontal level relative to
the Earth
3- The Sun is higher than the Earth, and higher than all solar
planets
4- The straight line from the Sun to the Earth is the main line in
the solar group
5- The planets revolve around this line, and not around the sun
herself..
6- i.e. the Planets revolve around the line connected between the
Sun and the Earth…
7- That means when the planet revolve around the sun, he will
revolve around the Earth also because both of them connected
by this same one line
8- That's why, the Ptolemy model lived very long time, because it
was correct
9- So if the planet revolve around the sun or around the Earth the
result will be the same, because both of them contributed to
create the main line in the solar group
10-And because the sun is higher than the Earth, we see the sun
hesitating motion to forward and backward with angle 63.7
degrees yearly, as a circle motion
11-So the sun circle motion is NOT true, but resulted from our
wrong vision for the sun motion…
12-I claim, the planets from the Earth to Pluto move toward the
sun, but Mercury and Venus move in the reverse direction
13-The Earth daily displacement toward the sun = 1 km
14-The previous modification can give us some explanation for
the Egyptian astronomical phenomenon 2737, in which
Mercury, Venus and Saturn were perpendicular on the Earth
on 3/12/2012(on the Egyptian pyramids heads-appendix No.1),
15-Which proves, that the planets Not only revolve around the sun
but also revolve around the Earth, supports this modification.

I do this research
2nd
25
No. 1 The Planets alignment in December 2012
( I called: The Egyptian Astronomic Phenomenon 2737)
1- Introduction
On 3rd
December 2012 aligned 3 planets (Mercury, Venus
and Saturn) on the three Great Pyramids heads in Egypt, the
Phenomenon repeated just once each 2737 years.
I called this phenomenon
"The 2737 Egyptian Astronomic Phenomenon"
In this paper I present the proof that the 2737 Egyptian
Phenomenon Cycle depends on the Moon Metonic Cycle!
And then in the 3rd
Chapter I'll discuss how the three planets (Mercury, Venus
and Saturn) depend on the Earth- moon orbit in their motions!
In this introduction I'll refer just to some interests we got by the 2737 Egyptian
phenomenon.
Some interests we got by 2737 Egyptian phenomenon:
 First we know that the Pyramids builders recognized the different
astronomic cycles, and especially 2737 phenomenon, for that they built
just 3 pyramids at its parallel line.
 Second, we know that the Pyramids builders knew the relative distances
between the planets and built the pyramids at their rates!
 Third where the 2737 phenomenon repeated on 3rd
December 2012 for
the third time, so the Number 8211 years is important number for human
life or at least for the pyramids age.
 Fourth, I may claim that the Pyramids builders built the three Pyramids
specifically for the 2737 Egyptian phenomenon.
 Note: The Great Pyramid Height is 5776 Egyptian inches = the distance
between the Sun & Pluto (each inch = 1 million kilometer)

I do this research
2nd
26
1ST
SECTION
Why the Lunar year doesn't correspond with the sidereal year at any
cycle?2
We know that the moon turns with the Earth around the sun, so why the lunar
year which equals 354.36 days (lunar Synodic period 29.53 days x 12 months)
doesn't correspond to the Sidereal year that equals 365.25 days at any cycle?
We see the 32 Sidereal year a cycle = 11688 days
But the Lunar year cycle =33 years - 5.81 days =11693.88-5.8= 11688
And why there's this addition 5.81 days to prevent both periods to meet each
other
We know that the plane of lunar orbit regresses 19 degrees each year that
causes the eclipse to come early 19 days each year3
So that said the movement of 19 degrees causes change for 19 days
And now we see the lunar year come early 5.81 days, and the lunar plane has
inclination to ecliptic equal approximately 5.14 degrees…
Can I suppose that this difference between Sidereal Cycle 11688 days and
Lunar Cycle 11693.88 days which equals 5.8 days caused by the lunar plane
inclination 5.14 degrees (later we will discuss How?) When we divided this
inclination value 5.14 degrees (or the period 5.8 days) at 360 we find that,
The Lunar orbital inclination causes the lunar Synodic day to come early
approximately 21 minutes daily..
That lead to the following results
- The correct Synodic month is 29.515
- The correct Synodic year is 354.1818 days And by such way
The lunar cycle which contain 33 Synodic year = 11687.999days
The Sidereal Cycles which contain 32 sidereal year = 11688 days
Where both come to end in the same day
And So the cycle of 32 sidereal years equals 33 modified Lunar Synodic years
(modified lunar year = 354.1818 days) perfectly
2
- the day defines here approximately 86164 seconds where the sidereal year is
365.25 days.
3
- Total Solar Eclipses and how to Observe them- Martin Mobberley- page. 11

I do this research
2nd
27
2ND
SECTION
The Basic Lunar Year 360 Days
Now I modified the lunar year already from 354.36 to be 354.1818 days
But there's another year related to the moon,
In this year we should added the modified year 354.1818 to the difference of
days caused by the lunar orbital inclination which was 5.8 days approximately
So 5.8+ 354.1818 = 360 days approximately
That's the ancient biblical year And I'll call it
The Basic Lunar Year
Now we have three types of years
- The Basic Lunar Year =360 days
- The modified lunar Synodic year =354.1818 days
- The Sidereal year = 365.25 days
And we'll see how the Metonic Cycle effect on each of them

I do this research
2nd
28
3RD
SECTION
The 2737 Egyptian Astronomic Phenomenon depends on Metonic Cycle
The Metonic Cycle defines as a moon Cycle continues for 19 Sidereal Orbit
year which equals 6939.75 days, and Metonic Cycle made because the Lunar
orbit plane regresses yearly 19 degrees that causes the eclipses to come early 19
days yearly.
The Following Table shows How The Metonic Cycle Effect On The Different
Years
Metonic
Cycle Number
Sidereal
years No.
(365.25
days)
Number of modified Lunar year (equals 354.1818
days)
The Basic lunar Year Numbers (360
days)
For each Metonic CycleLunar years in
each Metonic
cycle
The Lunar years
(354.1818days) Numbers
For each Metonic Cycle
M. Cycle 1 19 S. Year 19 19 Lunar Y. + 210.295 days 19 BLY (Basic Lunar Year) +
99.75d(days)
M. Cycle 2 38 S. Y 20 38 L. Y. +420.59d =
39 L. Y + 66.408 d
38 BLY+ 199.5 d
M. Cycle 3 57 S. Y 19 58 L. Y + 276.703 d 57 BLY+ 299.25d
M. Cycle 4 76 S. Y 20 77 L. Y +486.998 d =
78 L. Y +132.8162 d
76 BLY+399d =
77 BLY+39 days
M. Cycle 5 95 S. Y 19 97 L. Y + 343.111d 96 BLY+138.75d
M. Cycle 6 114 S. Y 20 116 L.Y +553.406d =
117 L. Y + 199.224d
115 BLY+ 238.5d
M. Cycle 7 133 S. Y 20 136 L. Y +409.519d=
137 L. Y +55.3374d
134BLY+ 338.25d
M. Cycle 8 152 S. Y 19 156 L. Y +265.6324d 153 BLY+438d= 154 BLY+78days
M. Cycle 9 171 S. Y 20 175 L. Y +475.9274d=
176 L. Y + 121.745d
173 BLY+ 17.75d
M. Cycle 10 190 S. Y 19 195 L. Y+ 332.0406d 192 BLY+ 277.5d
M. Cycle 11 209 S. Y 20 214L.Y +542.3356d=
215 L. Y +188.1538d
211 BLY+ 37.25d = 212 BLY+
17.25d
M. Cycle 12 228 S. Y 20 234 L. Y +398.4488d=
235 L. Y +44.267d
231 BLY+117d
M. Cycle 13 247 S. Y 19 254 L. Y +254.652d 250BLY+ 216.75d
M. Cycle 14 266 S. Y 20 273 L. Y +464.857d=
274 L. Y + 110.675d
269 BLY+216.5d
M. Cycle 15 285 S. Y 19 293 L. Y +320.9702d 288 BLY+416.25d= 289
BLY+56.25d
M. Cycle 16 304 S. Y 20 321L.Y +531.2653d=
313 L. Y +17.0834d
308 BLY+156d
M. Cycle 17 323 S. Y 20 332 L. Y +387.378d=
333 L. Y + 33.1966d
327 BLY+255.75d
M. Cycle 18 342 S. Y 19 352L.Y+ 243.4916d 346 BLY+ 355.5d
M. Cycle 19 361 S. Y 20 371L.Y +453.7866d=
372 L. Y + 99.60486d
365 BLY+455.25d=
366 BLY+ 95.25d
M. Cycle 20 380 S. Y 19 391 L. Y + 309.8992d 385 BLY+195d
M. Cycle 21 399 S. Y 20 410 L. Y + 520.1948d=
411 L. Y +166.013d
404 BLY+294.75 d
M. Cycle 22 418 S. Y 20 430 L. Y +376.308d
431 L. Y +22.12626d
423 BLY+394.5d=
424 BLY+ 34.25d
M. Cycle 23 437 S. Y 19 450 L. Y + 232.4212d 443 BLY+ 134.25d
M. Cycle 24 456 S. Y 20 469 L. Y +442.7162d=
470 L. Y + 88.5344d
462 BLY+ 234d
M. Cycle 25 475 S. Y 19 489 L. Y +298.829d 481 BLY+ 333.75d

I do this research
2nd
29
M. Cycle 26 494 S. 20 508 L. Y + 509.1244d=
509 L. Y + 154.9426d
500 BLY+433.5d=
501 BLY+ 73.5d
M. Cycle 27 513 S. Y 20 528 L. Y +365.2376d=
529 L. Y +11.0558d
520 BLY+173.25d
M. Cycle 28 532 S. Y 19 548 L. Y +221.3508d 539 BLY+273d
M. Cycle 29 551 S. Y 20 567 L. Y +431.6458d=
568 L. Y + 77.464d
558 BLY+ 372.75d=
559 BLY+ 12.5d
M. Cycle 31 589 S. Y 20 606 L. Y + 498.054d=
607 L. Y + 143.8722d
597 BLY+ 212.25d
M. Cycle 32 608 S. Y 20 626 L. Y + 354.1872=627 L.
Y
616 BLY+ 312d
M. Cycle 33 627 S. Y 19 646 L. Y + 210.295 635 BLY+ 441.75d =
636BLY+51.75d
M. Cycle 34 646 S. Y 20 665 L. Y + 420.5754d=
666 L. Y + 66.3936d
655 BLY+151.5d
M. Cycle 35 665 S. Y 19 685 L. Y + 276.6886d 674 BLY+ 251.25 d
M. Cycle 36 684 S. Y 20 704 L. Y +486.9836d=
705 L. Y ++132.801d
693 BLY+ 351 d
=713BLY+90.75d
M. Cycle 38 722 S. Y 20 743 L. Y + 553.391d=
744 L. Y + 199.2092d
732 BLY+190.5d
M. Cycle 39 741 S. Y 20 763 L. Y +409.5042d=
764 L. Y + 55.3224d
751BLY+289.5d
M. Cycle 40 760 S. Y 19 783 L.Y + 265.6174d= 770BLY+389d=
771 BLY +29 days

I do this research
2nd
30
The Previous Table Study classified into 2 parts
First Part : The study of the column of the modified lunar year (which
equals 354.1818days)
1- Each 32 Metonic Cycles the last day of modified lunar year (equals
354.1818 days) corresponds with the last day of Metonic cycle which is
the Sidereal Year last day where the lunar modified years equal 627
lunar years that equals 608 sidereal years perfectly.
2- The difference days between the Modified lunar year with the Metonic
Cycle moves in Cycle and decreases as following (66.4- 55.33- 44.26-
33.19- 22.126- 11.0558 – 0.00 days) at 98 years interval (98 modified
Lunar years – which equals 354.1818 days)
3- The modified Lunar years number for each Metonic Cycle shown in the
table, and I found the following Modified Lunar Year order "19-20-19-
20-19-20" repeats once with each Cycle consist of 627 modified Lunar
year
a. That means with the last day of the Metonic Cycle No. 32 which
equals 608 Sidereal Years but equals 627 Modified lunar year.
after this Cycle ends, and starts the new one the modified lunar
year order 19-20-19-20-19-20 will repeat once again as a mark
for the new Cycle starting (this order in table marks by Gray
color)
b. We can call the Metonic Cycle no. 32 a Cycle for the modified
Lunar year with the Metonic Cycle (this Cycle in Table remarked
by Yellow)
Second Part: The Study Of The column of the Basic Lunar Year ( equals =
360 Days)
1- We see in the table the day common fractions spread through the cycles
but these fractions unify to be one day each 4th
Metonic Cycle which
equals 76 Sidereal years (that similar to the Sidereal Year, 3 years equals
365 days and the 4th
year is 366 days)…..
2- but after 4th
Metonic Cycle the last day of Basic Lunar year (which
equals 360 days) doesn't correspond the last day of the Metonic Cycle
because there are 39 days addition to the Basic Lunar years (means 76
Sidereal years = 77 Basic Lunar Years +39 days). And with the

I do this research
2nd
31
following cycles this number increases regularly by addition 39 days
each 76 Sidereal years. (so after more 76 years we finds at the 8th
Metonic Cycle 154 Basic Lunar Year + 78 days…. And that continues)
3- But at Metonic Cycle No. 40th
which equals 760 Sidereal Years we find
this number equals 771 Basic Lunar years + 29 days, and that means the
rest days decreased from 39 days to be 29 days during period (760
Sidereal Years -76 Sidereal years = 684 years) and this is the
difference between the Metonic Cycle No. 4 and Metonic Cycle No.
40…and all that says… EACH 684 SIDEREAL YEARS, THE REST
DAYS DECREASE 10 DAYS
4- Now we know that 39 days prevented the basic lunar year to end in the
same day with the 4th
Metonic Cycle, and we know this period 39 days
decreases by 10 days each 684 sidereal years, and that means we need
four Cycles which will decrease the 39 days to be (-1 day) which is the
most near to the metonic Cycle.
5- Now we need 4 Cycles of the period 684 years where These 4 Cycles
Equals 2736 Sidereal Years
6- And based on that the 2736 Phenomenon was a Metonic Cycle and this
period was needed to Correspond the Basic Lunar year with the last day
of Metonic Cycle (the Basic Lunar Year equals 360 days – the bible
year which no one considers in modern life)
7- Now we saw 39 days which found in Metonic Cycle No. 4, have
decreased as (10/10/10/9) at interval 684 Sidereal years for each 10
days, by that we found the 2737 Egyptian phenomenon for which we
researched,
8- But still there are two questions, first about the number because we got
the Cycle of 2736 Sidereal Years and not 2737 Sidereal Years, and the
second question about the last day we need because 39 equals
(10/10/10/9) and the decreasing EACH 684 years equals 10 days and
that means the last cycle will have -1 day
We still have 2 question to answer respectively

I do this research
2nd
32
The First Question
says we got relation to the Cycle 2736 Sidereal years and not to 2737 Sidereal years
phenomenon? And how 2736 Cycle related to 2737 Cycle?
the answer
As we know Metonic Cycle is 6939.75days
We know Saros Cycle is 6585.35 days
And the difference between both is 354.2 days
Which equals a modified lunar year approximately..
While Metonic Cycle connected to Saros Cycle completely because the Metonic
Cycle is The lunar Orbit Cycle and Saroc Cycle is The Eclipse Cycles that made by
the Moon itself.. all that say to us, there's great connection between both Cycles..
Because there's a complete year difference between them (regardless the explanation
of How that occur!)
And we see this Cycle 2736 Sidereal years needs a complete sidereal year to be our
phenomenon 2737 …
So Both connected with Great Relation
While the first one depends on the Metonic Cycle that means the second also does.
The Second question about the minus day
39 days we found and the decreasing is 10 days each 684 Sidereal years means after
4 Cycles (2736 Sidereal years) the number 39 will decrease to be -1 day.. means the
Metonic Cycle will finish after the last Basic lunar year day with one complete day..
So each 2736 Sidereal years we have -1 day
So this Cycle will continues to be 10 (-10) days and to consume in one Cycle 3736
Sideral Years
Where 27360 Sidereal years = 1440 Metonic Cycles (which we may call astronomy
full day where the solar day equals 1440 Minutes).

I do this research
2nd
33
A comment on
The Egyptian Astronomic Phenomenon 2737
I'm very surprised that there's no any study dealt "the 2737 Egyptian
astronomic phenomenon"!
I see that not logical because the phenomenon tells us there were other people
understood perfectly the universe astronomy and they gave us a great gift by
building the great three pyramids as a references to such phenomenon, so why
the modern astronomy doesn't try to compare our knowledge with theirs
through encourage the studies and reports about this 2737 Egyptian astronomic
phenomenon.. actually it's illogical to neglect such very great gift we didn't
work for, but even got it without any payments or efforts, and its data are
available to us to compare our knowledge with ancient knowledge and correct
ourselves if it's necessary!!

I do this research
2nd
34
AUTHOR CURRICULUM VITAE
Freelance Translator
CONTACTS - Name : Gerges Francis Tawdrous
- Mobil : +201022532292
- Telephone : +222550186
- E-mail :mrwaheid@gmail.com
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com
- Address : 11 Mohmed Rageb St – madenet El Saada
El Materiya – Cairo – Egypt
EDUCATION
(All Certificates
Are Attached)
- Moscow -Russia –Peoples Friendship University
Of Russia –Since 2009 Till 2013 –Faculty Of Science.
- Nizhniy Novgorod –Russia- The Russian Language
Training Course 2007- 2008.
- Goethe institute - Cairo – 2001 to 2007
- Ain Shams University - Cairo- Bachelor Degree Of
Commerce -2000
LANGUAGES I provide the following translation
 English into Arabic and vice versa
 Russian into Arabic
 German into Arabic
SERVICES  Translation, Proofreading, and Editing.
 The rate around 3500 words daily
WORK
EXPERIENCE
 I have worked as freelance translator since 2003 till now,
so I gained a great expertise in different fields.
 I achieved special experience in the legal, economic &
technical fields, So I provide the perfect translation for the
contracts, agreements, memorandums, specifications,
laws, decrees, …etc.
 I provide the English authenticated translation (acceptable by
all courts, official organizations and the foreign embassies)
COMPUTER SKILLS I am an experienced computer user, I work with MS Office (Word,
Excel, etc.), Reader, Adobe Acrobat (full), WinZip, WinRar, etc.
PERSONAL
DATA
 Date of Birth : 09/10/1974 – Cairo.
 Martial status : Single
 Nationality : Egyptian
 Religion :Christian
BEST REGARDS

I do this research
2nd
35

I do this research
2nd
36

I do this research
2nd
37

I do this research
2nd
38

I do this research
2nd
39

I do this research
2nd
40
The Author Other Papers
I- The Holy Bible Studies
The Tabernacle Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/pdf/1701.0344v1.pdf
II- The Physics & Astronomy Studies
"the Solar System Part 4"
"The Solar System Geometry (Part No.3)"
also
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-solar-system-geometry-part-no3
"The Solar System Geometry (Part 2)"
also
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-solar-system-geometry-part-2
" The Solar System Geometry (Part I)"
also
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-solar-system-geometry-part-i-
51989014?qid=a789c6b2-5395-4cde-be61-b777af04e643&v=&b=&from_search=2
The Time And Distance Definitions In The Solar System
The Solar Eclipse Geometry Basics
The 2737 Egyptian Phenomenon & Its identical distance 2737 millions km
The Mars Data Analysis Proves the Rest Mass Concept is Unreal
The Solar Eclipse "The Gravitation Theory Puzzle"
All Manuscripts
https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

A modification for copernicus kepler model

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to A modification for copernicus kepler model (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

A modification for copernicus kepler model