A Multidimensional Classification of 55 Enterprise Architecture Frameworks
1 like2,191 views
The document presents a multidimensional classification of 55 enterprise architecture frameworks, examining them across six dimensions including architectural domain and chronological development. It highlights that most frameworks arise from government, business, and military domains, with TOGAF recognized as the most established framework. The analysis indicates a gap in frameworks that cater specifically to corporate strategy and small to medium enterprises.
A Multidimensional Classification of 55 Enterprise Architecture Frameworks
- 1. A Multidimensional Classification of 55 Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Dr. Eldar Sultanow Dr. Carsten Brockmann Kai Schroeder Sean Cox
- 2. 2 Agenda ! Problem statement and objectives ! Methodology ! Results of the comparison ! Conclusion ! Contact persons
- 3. Problem statement and objectives 3Copyright © Capgemini 2016. All Rights Reserved Many frameworks exist Readers should be able to compare the frameworks based on a determined set of criteria Purpose of each framework not well known in the community
- 4. 4 Agenda ! Problem statement and objectives ! Methodology ! Results of the comparison ! Conclusion ! Contact persons
- 5. Methodology 5Copyright © Capgemini 2016. All Rights Reserved Comparison of 55 frameworks in six dimensions Dimension 2: Architectural domain scope: strategy, business processes, information systems, Infrastructure Dimension 3: Mutability: once formed, self-preserving Dimension 4: Alignment: socio-cultural, functionally, structurally, infological, contextually Dimension 5: Intentional dimension: government and agency frameworks, management frameworks, military frameworks, manufacturing-specific frameworks, technically oriented frameworks, interoperability frameworks, Add-on frameworks Dimension 1: Covering size of organizations: local business unit, association of local business units, spatially distributed organization, global corporate networks Dimension 6: Chronological Dimension: The arrangement of these frameworks following one after another in time when they are published or developed, a sequence according to time of occurrence
- 6. 6 Agenda ! Problem statement and objectives ! Methodology ! Results of the comparison ! Conclusion ! Contact persons
- 7. Results of the comparison (1/2) 7Copyright © Capgemini 2016. All Rights Reserved
- 8. Results of the comparison (2/2) 8Copyright © Capgemini 2016. All Rights Reserved
- 9. 9 Agenda ! Problem statement and objectives ! Methodology ! Results of the comparison ! Conclusion ! Contact persons
- 10. Conclusion 10Copyright © Capgemini 2016. All Rights Reserved Most frameworks were developed out of the following domains: Government, Business and Military EAF frameworks are usually forks of existing frameworks TOGAF is the best established framework. Many frameworks provided the foundation for TOGAF Few frameworks consider corporate strategy. TOGAF for example allows the use of the Business Motivation Model via the TOGAF Motivation Extension Very few frameworks can be applied within a SME
- 11. 11 Agenda ! Problem statement and objectives ! Methodology ! Results of the comparison ! Conclusion ! Contact persons
- 12. Contact Persons 12 Dr. Eldar Sultanow Lead Consultant / Architect Capgemini Nürnberg E-Mail: Eldar.Sultanow@capgemini.com Dr. Carsten Brockmann Lead Consultant / Architect Capgemini Berlin E-Mail: Carsten.Brockmann@capgemini.com Kai Schroeder Head of Architects Service Industries Capgemini Hamburg E-Mail: Kai.Schroeder@capgemini.com