A Novel Rotor Resistance Estimation Technique for Vector Controlled Induction Motor Drive Using TS Fuzzy

International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive System (IJPEDS)
Vol. 6, No. 3, September 2015, pp. 538~553
ISSN: 2088-8694  538
Journal homepage: http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJPEDS
A Novel Rotor Resistance Estimation Technique for Vector
Controlled Induction Motor Drive Using TS Fuzzy
Saji Chacko*, Chandrashekhar N. Bhende**, Shailendra Jain*, R.K. Nema*
* Department of Electrical Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology (MANIT), Bhopal (MP), India.
** School of Electrical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Bhubaneswar (Orissa), India.
Article Info ABSTRACT
Article history:
Received Feb 18, 2015
Revised Jul 17, 2015
Accepted Aug 1, 2015
Induction motor with indirect field oriented control is well suited for high
performance applications due to its excellent dynamic behavior. However it
is sensitive to variations in rotor time constant, especially variation in rotor
resistance. In this study a scheme based on the Rotor flux Model Reference
Adaptive Controller is used for on line identification of the rotor resistance
and thus improving the steady state performance of the drive. The overriding
feature of this estimation technique is the accurate identification of rotor
resistance during transient and steady state conditions for drive operation at
full load and at zero speed condition. Moroever, the effectiveness of the TS
fuzzy controller utilizing rotor flux for online estimation of rotor resistance
for four quadrant operation of motor drive is investigated and compared with
the conventional PI and Mamdani fuzzy controller.Simulation results in
MATLAB/Simulink environment have been presented to confirm the
effectiviness of the proposed technique.
Keyword:
Adaptive system
Indirect rotor flux oriented
Induction motor
Mamdani fuzzy controller
Takagi Sugeno fuzzy controller
Proportional Integral controller
Rotor flux Model Reference
Vector Control Copyright © 2015 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science.
All rights reserved.
Corresponding Author:
Saji Chacko
Department of Electrical Engineering
Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology (MANIT)
Bhopal (MP), India.
Contact: +91- 9893174845, Fax. : 0755-2670562
E-mail:chackosaji68@gmail.com
1. INTRODUCTION
Till the beginning of 1980’s all such applications which require high speed holding accuracy, wide
range of speed control and fast transient response used DC motor drives. Traditionally AC machines were
used in applications like fan, pump and compressor which requires rough speed regulation and where the
transient response is not critical [1]. The advances in the field of power electronics has contributed to the
development of control techniques where the performance of an AC machine became comparable with that
of a DC machine [2]. These techniques are known as vector control techniques and are classified as
Direct/feedback field oriented control method (DFOC) and indirect/ feed forward method (IRFOC) [3]. The
method depends on the determination of instantaneous rotor flux phasor position known as field angle or
unit vector.
One of the main issues of vector control is its dependence on motor model and is therefore sensitive
to the motor parameter variations [4]. The variations are mainly due to the saturation of the magnetizing
inductance and the stator / rotor resistance due to temperature and skin effect. These variations will lead to
error on the flux amplitude and its orientation along the d-axis. The system thus becomes unstable and also
increases the losses in the system. In general the field oriented control method most commonly used in
industries is the indirect field oriented control where the orientation of the flux space vector is estimated
using the slip signal and the measured speed. However the feed forward adjustment of the slip signal requires

 ISSN: 2088-8694
IJPEDS Vol. 6, No. 3, September 2015 : 538 – 553
539
knowledge of rotor resistance, rotor inductance and magnetizing inductance values and is estimated from the
equivalent circuit model [5].
It has been given that the variations of rotor resistance and therefore the rotor time constant is the
most critical in indirect field oriented vector controlled drives [6]. If this change is not estimated, the
orthogonality between the synchronous frame variables is lost leading to cross coupling and poor
dynamic performance of the drive system. Therefore major efforts were put in for online estimation of rotor
resistance. The online parameter estimation technique can be broadly classified as spectral analysis
technique, observer based technique, model reference adaptive system technique and artificial intelligence
techniques [7-12].
The model reference adaptive systems scheme as shown in Figure 1 is the most popularly used for
rotor resistance estimation because of its simpler implementation and less computational efforts compared to
other methods. The technique proposes calculation of a parameter to be identified in two different ways [13-
15]. The first calculation is based on references inside the control system known as the estimated value and
the second known as the reference value depends on measured signals. One of the two values should be
independent of the parameter which is to be estimated. The accuracy of this technique is based heavily on the
machine model. The difference obtained between the reference and the estimated value is taken as an error
signal and is used to drive an adaptive mechanism .Based on the formulation of the error signal the MRAC
are further subcategorized as electromagnetic torque based, rotor flux based, voltage based and
reactive power based. The adaptive mechanism normally uses a PI controller for the generation of the change
in rotor resistance ∆ [16]. The PI controller may not give satisfactory performance for operating condition
where frequent variation in motor speed and load torque is required. Fuzzy logic controllers as compared to
PI controller do not require precise mathematical model,can handle nonlinearity and are more robust [17, 18].
Based on the rule consequent the fuzzy controllers are further classified as Mamdani and TS fuzzy controller.
In TS-Fuzzy the linguistic rule consequent is made variable by means of its parameters and hence, it can
produce an infinite number of gain variation characteristics [19] .Morever it has a definite edge over the
Mamdani fuzzy due to the less number of fuzzy sets used for the inputs, leading to lesser rule sets.
Figure 1. Block diagram of MRAC
As per the author’s knowledge, no work has been reported where the TS fuzzy controller has been
used as an adaptive mechanism for identification of rotor resistance based on Rotor Flux Model Reference
Adaptive Controlller (RF-MRAC) instead of the existing PI and Mamdani fuzzy controllers as stated in paper
[16-18]. In this paper the RF-MRAC using TS fuzzy controller as adaptive mechanism is devoloped and is
investigated for an IRFOC induction motor drive.The objective of the proposed work is 1) to obtain an
accurate online rotor resistance identification scheme for a four quadrant drive operation and also to
minimize the over excitation/under excitation of the motor flux due to rotor resistance variations, 2) accurate
identification of rotor resistance under symmetrical short circuit condition of rotor circuit and 3) to oberve the
effectiveness of the identification technique when the drive is operating at zero speed with rated load torque
condition. This paper evaluates the performance index of the rotor resistance identification as integral time
square error (ITSE) for the proposed scheme and is compared with the other two controllers i.e. the PI and
the Mamdani fuzzy.
The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 provides a brief overview of the dynamic modeling of
the field oriented vector control drive. Section 3 describes the functions of the various block involved in the
modeling of the vector controlled I.M drive and also the rotor resistance identification scheme using RF -
.MRAC. Section 4 describes the Mamdani fuzzy control scheme as an adaptive mechanism of the rotor flux
model reference adaptive system. Section 5 describes in detail the design and implementation of the proposed
TS fuzzy control scheme as the adaptive mechanism of RF-MRAS. Section 6 details the simulation results of

IJPEDS ISSN: 2088-8694 
A Novel Rotor Resistance Estimation Technique for Vector Controlled Induction Motor…(Saji Chacko)
540
the PI, Mamdani and proposed TS fuzzy adaptive scheme under different drive operating conditions and
conclusion is given in Section 7.
2. DESIGN FOR VECTOR CONTROL DRIVES
The dynamic model of induction motor for rotor flux oriented vector control application can be
written as follows
_ _
0
1
0
1
0
0
(1)
Where denotes the derivative operator , , are the stator currents and , the rotor
fluxes in frame. Similarly , , and are the stator résistance, stator self inductance, rotor
resistance and the rotor self inductance respectively. The rotor time constant is given as and leakage
inductance is where 1 .
For rotor flux oriented control the rotor flux is directed along the d-axis and is equal to and
therefore 0. Thus the equation (1a) modifies to as shown below
0
_ _
0
0
0
1
0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0
(2)
From equation (2b) it can be seen that the axis voltage are coupled by the following terms:
(3)
(4)
To achieve linear control of stator voltage it is necessary to remove the decoupling terms and is
cancelled by using a decoupled method that utilizes nonlinear feedback of the coupling voltage.
3. MODELING OF VOLTAGE CONTROLLED IM DRIVE WITH ROTOR RESISTANCE
ESTIMATOR
The main aim of the vector control of induction motor is to control it just like a separately excited
DC motor drive where one can obtain independent control of the two variables armature and field current
which are orthogonal to each other thus having independent control over torque and flux. The block diagram
of an indirect rotor flux oriented speed control of induction motor is shown in Figure 2. The scheme consists
of the current control loop within the speed control loop. The scheme uses PI controllers for the d-axis and q-
axis current whose proportional and integral gains are as shown in Appendix-III, the bandwidth of the inner
current loop is chosen higher than the flux and speed controller. The voltage decoupling equations (3) & (4)
are adjusted with the output of the controllers to obtain good current control action. The d-axis and q-axis
reference voltages and thus obtained are transformed to the stationary i.e. stator reference frame
with the help of field angle .The two phase voltage and in the stator reference frame are then
transformed to three phase stator reference voltages , , which acts as modulating voltage for the

 ISSN: 2088-8694
541
modulator by using the sine-triangle pulse width modulation (SPWM) scheme . The modulator output which
is in the form of pulses is used to drive the IGBT with anti-parallel diode acting as switches for the
conventional two level voltage source inverter (VSI).
As shown in Figure 2 the stator currents are measured and transformed as d-q axis currents, which
are then used as feedback signals for the current controller. The d- axis current is passed through a low
pass filter with time constant equal to rotor time constant to obtain the rotor flux which acts as feedback to
the flux controller. The rotor speed , torque current rotor flux and rotor time constant are used
to determine the slip speed and from it the rotor flux position for and transformation.
Figure 2. Block diagram of a voltage controlled IFOC drive.
a. Rotor Resistance Identification using Rotor Flux
The block diagram of the rotor flux based MRAC for identification of rotor resistance is shown in
Figure 3, where the inputs , , , & are the motor terminal voltages, current and speed feedbacks.
The rotor flux obtained from the voltage model which acts as the reference output of the model adaptive
reference scheme is obtained by measuring the machine terminal voltage and currents, which are then
transformed to the stationary reference frame as , , & .
Figure 3. Proposed rotor flux based MRAC for rotor resistance estimation
The rotor flux where and are the d-axis and q-axis rotor flux in the
stationary reference frame which are derived as:
(5)
and
(6)

542
given that = and = are the stator d-q flux in stationary
reference frame, is the leakage inductance and is the stator resistance.
Similarly the flux output is obtained from the current model for the adjustable
model is obtained by measuring the current and motor speed , where
1
(7)
and
1
(8)
The difference between and acts as the error signal for the adaptive mechanism whose
output indicates the change in rotor resistance ∆ which is then added up with the nominal resistance value
i.e. to achieve the actual rotor resistance .The obtained new value of corresponding to change in
rotor resistance is then used to determine the slip speed and is added up with the rotor speed to obtain
the synchronous speed .
4. IMPLEMENTATION OF FUZZY CONTROLLER
In this study the conventional PI controller as an adaptive mechanism has been replaced by
Mamdani fuzzy controller. The fuzzy controller as shown in Figure 4 consists of two inputs e k and
e k and one output ∆u. The input e k is the difference between the reference rotor flux “ψr ” and actual
rotor flux "ψr i.e. k ψr ψr , and the input e k which indicates the change in error and is given
as e k e k e k 1 . There are two normalizing factors k1&k2 for inputs e1and e2 and one de-
normalizing factor for output ∆u. In normalization process the input values are scaled in the range [-1, 1] and
the de-normalization process converts the crisp output value of the fuzzy controller to a value depending on
the output control element. In the fuzzifier the crisp values of input and are converted into fuzzy values
[20]. For this purpose seven triangular fuzzy membership functions are defined for each input as well as the
output.
Figure 4. Block diagram of a Fuzzy controller
Figure 5 illustrates the triangle membership functions of the first input i.e. which are defined
by seven linguistic variables as Negative Big (NB) Negative Medium (NM), Negative Small (NS), Zero (Z),
Positive Small (PS), Positive Medium (PM) and Positive Big (PB). The overlap rates of the membership are
taken as 50%.
The fuzzy rule base represent the knowledge of human operators who make necessary changes in
the controller output to obtain system with minimum error and faster response. For this the behavior of the
error signals and has to be observed and accordingly it is to be decided whether the controller
output ∆ is to be increased or decreased. The controller for the study make use of the sliding mode rule base
shown in Figure 6 as it is easy to implement for real time application
The developed fuzzy logic uses the min – max compositional rule of inference. The inference
mechanism of the fuzzy controller is implemented with regard to the rule base given by μ
min μ 1 , μ 2 .

 ISSN: 2088-8694
543
The defuzzifier process makes use of the centre of gravity method and is given as ∆μ
∑
∑
where, n is the number of fuzzy sets in the output.
Figure 5. Input variable e1 (k) membership function

NB NM NS Z PB PM PB
NB NB NB NB NB NM NS Z
NM NB NB NB NM NZ Z PS
NB NB NB NM NS Z PS PM
Z NB NM NS Z PS PM PB
PS NM NS Z PS PM PB PB
PM NS Z PS PM PB PB PB
PB Z PB PM PB PB PB PB
Figure 6. Mamdani Fuzzy rule base for rotor resistance estimation
5. DESIGN OF PROPOSED TS FUZZY CONTROLLER
The major difference betweenthe Mamdani and the TS fuzzy controller is that the former employ
fuzzy sets as the consequent where as the later employ linear function as the consequent [21]. The linguistic
rule consequent is made variable by means of its parameters and therefore the TS fuzzy control scheme can
produce a large number of gain variations. For the study the input variables are and same as
defined above.for Mamdani fuzzy. Each variable was fuzzified by two inputs fuzzy sets named as positive
(P) and negative (N) respectively as shown in Figure 7. The mathematical representation of positive and
negative membership function for the input variables are given below.
μ
0,
2
1,
, (9)
μ
1,
2
0,
, (10)
The value of μ μ is either 0 or 1 when is outside the interval [-L, L]. The value
of L plays an important role in the controller performance and should be judiciously chosen. As there are two
fuzzy sets for each input, there will be (2 x 2) fuzzy values to cover all these combinations. The fuzzy control
rules for the two inputs use the following simplified rules as shown in Table 1.
-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Eflux
Degreeofmembership
NL NM NS Z PS PM PL

544
Figure7. Input variables membership function
Table 1. TS fuzzy rule set
Rule No. IF 1 AND 2 THEN
R1 Positive Positive 1 1 1 ∗ 1 2 ∗ 2
R2 Positive Negative 2 2 ∗ 1
R3 Negative Positive 3 3 ∗ 1
R4 Negative Negative 4 4 ∗ 1
The corresponding incremental output of the fuzzy controller is
μ 1 ∗
∑ μ
∑ μ
(11)
where 1 1 ∗ 1 2 ∗ 2
For this study the algorithm of the proposed TS fuzzy controller is developed and programmed in
MATLAB M-file and is then used as a Simulink block in the model with the help of Embedded M Function
block available in the MATLAB/Simulink library. The values of the six constants 1, 2, 3, 4 1 2
as given in Appendix-II are determined by trial and error with performance indice as the integral time square
error of (k). In general the number of unknown constants for 2 rules are given by 2 , where M
stands for the number of inputs.
6. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
A simulation model of voltage controlled IRFOC as shown in Figure 2 is developed in a
MATLAB/Simulink environment to ascertain the effectiveness of the proposed adaptive algorithm. The
parameters and ratings of the test motor are given in Appendix-I. The SPWM based indirect rotor flux
oriented controller is tested for step increase in rotor resistance by connecting a three phase star connected
resistor bank to the rotor of the three phase slip ring induction motor externally. Similarly a step decrease in
rotor resistance is obtained by instrumenting the wrong rotor resistance value in the controller. The
simulation time used are only to explain the concepts, as such sudden practical changes in rotor resistance
due to temperature variation rarely occurs in practice due to the large thermal time constant of the motor. The
IRFOC drive is subjected to different operating conditions noted as Case-II to IV below, during which step
increase and decrease in rotor resistance is initiated to test the effectiveness of the adaptive mechanism.
Under these operating conditions the performance analysis of the proposed TS fuzzy controller based RF-
MRAC in terms of settling time and steady state error is made and is compared with the other established
controllers i.e. the PI and Mamdani fuzzy controller.
6.1. Case-I: Speed and Load Torque Constant with RF-MRAS Disabled
The IRFOC drive is operated at constant speed set of 1000 rpm and load torque of 4 Nm. as shown
in Figures 8 and 9. A step change in motor rotor resistance above by 50% and below by 30% of its nominal
value is done at t=12sec with rotor flux model reference adaptive mechanism kept inactive. From
Figure 10 (a) & (b) it is observed that the actual and the reference value of the d-axis flux remains same i.e.
0.936 ωb till the instrumented and actual value of rotor resistance are equal. At t=12 sec when the change in
rotor resistance is initiated it is seen that, the increase in rotor resistance has resulted in sudden changes in the
motor actual flux with its value increasing from 0.936 ωb to 1.195ωb. Similarly the decrease in rotor

 ISSN: 2088-8694
545
resistance has resulted in the actual flux decreasing from 0.936 ωb to 0.6 respectively. The increase in
rotor flux may lead to over excitation of the motor resulting in increased core losses and saturation. It also
seen from Figure11 that the electromagnetic developed by the motor has also decreased when the rotor
resistance is decreased.
Figure 8. Tracking of constant speed reference of 1000 rpm
Figure 9. Tracking the constant load torque reference 4Nm
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
time (sec)
Rotorspeed(rpm)
Reference rotor speed
Actual rotor speed for PI based MRAS
Actual rotor speed for Mamdani fuzzybased MRAS
Actual rotor speed for TS fuzzybase MRAS

546
(b)
Figure 10. Rotor flux for step (a) increase (b) decrease in rotor resistance with identification disabled
Figure 11. Effect on Torque devolped for step increase in rotor resistance with identification disabled
6.2. Case-II: Speed and Load Torque Constant with RF-MRAS Enabled
The IFOC drive is now subjected to the same operating condition as above, with step change in rotor
resistance at t = 12 sec. The integral time square error performance index is used for finding the coefficients
k and k of the PI controller acting as the adaptive mechanism and are found to be 5 and 80 respectively. It
is observed from Figure 12 (a) and (b) that during motor starting condition with PI controller, peak overshoot
of rotor flux occurs which lasts for about 1.5sec before tracking the reference flux value whereas for
Mamdani and TS fuzzy controller no such overshoot in rotor flux during starting transient is observed. At
t=12 sec the change in resistance has resulted in increase of the d-axis flux from its nominal value of 0.936
ωb for all the three controllers with peak overshoot again more pronounced for the PI controller before
settling to its steady state flux value. From Figure 13 (a) & (b) it is also seen that the performance of the TS
fuzzy controller is excellent as it can track the step change in rotor resistance in 1.5 sec compared to the other
two controllers with its steady state error taken as integral time square error (ITSE) very low as shown in
Table 2. The same performance index is obtained from the TS fuzzy controller when the instrumented value
of the rotor resistance is made less than the actual motor resistance value.

 ISSN: 2088-8694
547
(a)
(b)
Figure12. Rotor flux for step (a) increase (b) decrease in rotor resistance, Case-II
(a)

548
(b)
Figure13. Rotor resistance identification for step (a) increase (b) decrease in rotor resistance, Case-II
6.3. Case III: Variable Motor Speed with Constant Load with RF-MRAS Enabled
The IFOC drive is subjected to speed changes as shown in Figure 14 where the drive operates at
1000 rpm from 2-16 sec and then operates at zero speed at full load torque from 16-22 sec and thereafter
operates in the reverse direction at 500 rpm from 22 -25 sec. exhibiting the condition of industrial overhead
crane drive. The step increase and decrease in rotor resistance as described above is again initiated at t
=12sec. It is seen from Figure 15 (a) that the actual flux oscillates from its reference value with PI adaptive
mechanism during motor starting and again sustained oscillation in rotor flux is observed when it is rotating
in the reverse direction, which becomes more pronounced when the step decrease in rotor resistance is made
as seen in Figure 15 (b) It is also observed from Figure 16 (a) the steady state error in terms of rotor
resistance estimation is the lowest for TS fuzzy., but its performance when the rotor resistance is decreased
detoriates considerably when compared with Mamdani fuzzy controller and also sustained oscillations in
rotor resistance estimation is obseverd in Figure 16 (b) when the drive is operating at zero speed.
Figure 14. Variable reference rotor speed track for step increase in rotor resistance

 ISSN: 2088-8694
549
(a)
(b)
Figure 15. Rotor flux for step (a) increase (b) decrease in rotor resistance, Case-III
(a)

550
(b)
Figure 16. Rotor resistance identification for step (a) increase (b) decrease in rotor resistance, Case-III
6.4. Case IV: Motor Speed Constant with Variable Load Torque and RF-MRAS Enabled
The IRFOC drive is subjected to variable load torque as shown in Figure 17 depicting the operating
condition of a crusher motor drive with load torque made negative equal to 2 Nm at t=22sec representing
regenerative braking condition. It is very well observed from Figure 18 (a)& (b) and from Figure 19 (a) & (b)
that amongst the three controllers the steady state error in terms of rotor flux and estimation of rotor
resistance value is the lowest for TS fuzzy controller as shown by the performance index listed in Table 2.
Figure 17. Tracking of variable torque reference with RF-MRAS enabled
(a)

 ISSN: 2088-8694
551
(b)
Figure 18. Rotor flux for step (a) increase (b) decrease in rotor resistance, Case-IV
(a)
(b)
Figure 19. Rotor resistance identification for step (a) increase (b) decrease in rotor resistance, Case-IV
7. CONCLUSION
A new approach for the rotor resistance identification of induction motor drive based on rotor flux
model reference adaptive system using TS fuzzy controller as an adaptive mechanism has been presented.
The identification is online and is based on the steady state model of indirect field oriented controller. From
the investigations it can be appreciated that the performance of the TS fuzzy controller is better than the PI
and Mamdani fuzzy controller under stringent motor operating condition as well as when the drive is under
zero speed operating condition. It is observed from the simulation results that the d-axis flux settles
approximately in 2-2.5 sec and its peak overshoot during change in operating condition or motor rotor
resistance parameter variation is less compared to the other two controllers. Moreover, it is also observed
from the results that leaving apart Case- III. (b) which, of course can be improved by optimizing the fewer no

552
of TS fuzzy parameters as compared to Mamdani fuzzy using Evolutionary Algorithm, the tracking of change
in rotor resistance by TS fuzzy controller in terms of steady state error (ITSE) and peak overshoot is superior
to both PI and Mamdani fuzzy controller.
Table 2. Comparison of controller performance with regard to rotor resistance identification for step (a)
increase (b) decrease in I.M rotor resistance at t=12 sec for Case II-IV
Description
Controller Type
PI Mamdani Fuzzy TSFuzzy
Steady State error
(ITSE)
Steady State error
(ITSE)
Steady State error
(ITSE)
CCase
II
(a) 4.738 4.929 0.01505
(b) 1.201 2.067 0.06346
CCase
III
(a) 102.4 46.91 45.32
(b) 150 45.61 184.6
CCase
IV
(a) 62.52 20.87 7.43
(b) 22.64 17.79 6.6
APPENDIX-I
Parameters of the IM used
Ratings
Power: - 0.746 KW. Frequency: - 50Hz, Voltage:-415V, Stator current:-1.8Amp, Speed:-1450 rpm, Pole
pair:-2
Machine constants
Stator Resistance (Rs) = 10.75 Ω., Rotor Resistance (Rr) = 9.28 Ω, Stator/Rotor Self Inductance (Ls/Lr)
=0.5318 H Moment of Inertia (J) = 0.011787 kgm2,
Friction coefficient (B) = 0.0027 Nm/rad/sec
APPENDIX-II
TS Fuzzy Parameters Used In Simulation: a1 = 3; a2 = 1.5; k1 = 1.18; k2= 0.15; k3=0; k4= 5;
APPENDIX-III
Proportional ( ) and Integral ( ) Gains of PI Controller
PI Controller
Speed control loop 1.295 0.2967
Flux control loop 110.6 1083.5
Inner current loops 98.61 9087.04
REFERENCES
[1] Finch J. W. Controlled AC Electrical Drives. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2008; 55(2): 481-491.
[2] Bose B. K. Power electronics and motor drives, recent progress and perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Industrial
Electronics. 2009; 56(2): 581-588.
[3] S. Ogasawara. H., Akagi, Akira. Nabae. The generalized theory of indirect vector controlled AC machines. IEEE
Transactions on Industry Applications. 1998; 24(3): 470-478.
[4] R. Krishnan, F.C. Doran. Study of parameter sensitivity in high-performance inverter-fed induction motor drive
systems. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 1987; IA-23: 623-635.
[5] R. Krishnan, A.S. Bhardawaj. A Review of Parameter sensvitivity and adaptation in indirect vector controlled
induction motor drive systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 1991; 6(4): 695-703.
[6] A. Shiri, A. Vahedi. A. Shoulaie. The effect of parameter variation on the performance of indirect vector controlled
IM Drive. IEEE 5th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference. 2006; vol. 2, pp. 1,5, 14-16,
[7] T. Matsuo, T. Lipo. Rotor parameter identification scheme for vector controlled Induction motor drive. IEEE
Transactions on Industry Applications. 1985; IA-21(3): 624-632.
[8] Garces L. J. Parameter adaption for the Speed Controlled Static AC drive with a squirrel cage Induction Motor.
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Applications. 1986; IA-22(2): 173-178.
[9] T.M. Rowan, R.J. Kerkman, D. Leggate. A simple online adaption for indirect field orientation of an induction
machine. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 1991; 27(4): 720-727.
[10] M. Jannati, N.R.N. Idris, M.J.A Aziz. Indirect Rotor Field Oriented Control of Fault Tolerant Drive System for
Three Phase Induction Motor with Rotor Resistance Estimation Using EKF. TELKOMNIKA Indonesian Journal of
Electrical Engineering. 2014; 12: 6633-6643

 ISSN: 2088-8694
553
[11] Slobadan N. Vukosavic, Milc R. Stojic. On Line Tuning of the Rotor Time Constant for Vector Controlled
Induction motor in Position control applications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 1993; 40(1): 130-
138.
[12] Hamid. A. Toliyat, Emil Levi, Mona Raina. A review of RFO induction motor parameter estimation techniques.
IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversions. 2003; 18(2): 271-283.
[13] S. Maiti, C. Chakraborty, Yoichi Hori, Minch. C. Ta. Model reference adaptive Controller based rotor resistance
techniques for vector controlled I.M using reactive power. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2008;
55(2): 594-601.
[14] Z. Li, Z .Yin, Y.Xiong, X.Liu. Rotor Speed and Stator Resistance Identification Scheme for Sensorless Induction
Motor Drives. TELKOMNIKA Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering. 2013; 11: 503-512.
[15] Mohammed K Metwally. Control of Four Switch Three Phase Inverter Fed Induction Motor Drives Based Speed
and Stator Resistance Estimation. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems. 2014; 4: 192-203.
[16] B. Karanyil, M.F. Rahman, C.Grantham. PI and fuzzy Estimators for on line tracking of rotor resistance of Indirect
vector controlled Induction motor drive; Proceedings of the International Electrical machine and drives conference
IEMDC .Masschusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. USA, 2001: 820-825
[17] Edson Bim. Fuzzy optimization for rotor constant identification of an indirect F.O.C induction motor drive. IEEE
Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2001; 48(6): 1293-1295.
[18] B. Karanyil, M. F. Rahman. Stator and rotor resistance observer for I.M. drive using Fuzzy logic and ANN. IEEE
Tranactions on Energy Conservations. 2005; 20(4):770-778.
[19] C.N. Bhende, S. Mishra, S.K. Jain. TS-Fuzzy Controlled Active Power Filter for Load Compensation. IEEE
Tranactions. On Power Delivery. 2006; 21: 1459-1465.
[20] Lee C.C. Fuzzy logic in control systems: Fuzzy logic controller Part I and II. IEEE Tranasactions on System Man,
and Cybernetics. 1990; 20: 404-485.
[21] Hao Ying. The Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Controllers using the simplified linear control rules are nonlinear variable
gain controllers. Automatika, Elsevier Science Ltd. 1998; 34:157-167.
BIBLIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS
Saji T Chacko was born in Chattisgarh, (C.G), India in 1968. He is a faculty of Electrical and
Electronics Engineering at Shri Shankaracharya Technical Campus, Bhilai, C.G, India and is
currently pursuing his PhD from Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, M.P,
India. He is the author of 3 International Journal and Conference and 5 National conferences. His
area of research interest is Power Electronics and drives, Application of soft computing techniques
for estimation and fault detection in Electric Drives.
Chandrakant Narayan Bhende was born in Nagpur, Maharashtra, India in 1977. He got his PhD
degree from Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India in 2008 and thereafter did his Post
Doctoral Research from University of Wollongong, He is currently Assistant Professor, School of
Electrical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Bhubhaneshwar, Orissa, India. He is the author
of 10 International journals His area of research interest includes Power Quality, Custom Power
Devices, Renewable Energy sources and application of Soft computing Techniques in Power
systems
Shailendra Jain was born in Madhya Pradesh (M.P), India in 1968. He got his Ph.D. degree from
Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India, in 2003, and the PDF from the University of
Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, in 2007. He is Professor in the Department of Electrical
Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, M.P, India, He is the
author of more than 70 Journals and 50 conference papers in National and International
Publication like IEEE, Elsevier etc and reviewer of National and International Journals.. He has
authored a book on “Modeling and Simulation “by Wiley, India. His area of research interests are
power electronics and electric drives, power quality improvement, multi-level inverters,
Rajesh Kumar Nema was born in Madhya Pradesh (M.P) India in 1963. He got his PhD degree
from Bhopal University, Bhopal, India in 2004. Received “Colombo award” under Cultural
Exchange programme “Indo-UK REC Project”. He is Professor in the Department of Electrical
Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, M.P, India, He is the author
of more than 7 Journals and 50 conference papers in National and International Publication. His
principle areas of research interest are Power Electronics, Solar Photovoltaics, Instrumentation,
Distributed Generation. Multilevel Inverters, Microprocessor and DSP.

A Novel Rotor Resistance Estimation Technique for Vector Controlled Induction Motor Drive Using TS Fuzzy

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to A Novel Rotor Resistance Estimation Technique for Vector Controlled Induction Motor Drive Using TS Fuzzy (20)

More from IAES-IJPEDS (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

A Novel Rotor Resistance Estimation Technique for Vector Controlled Induction Motor Drive Using TS Fuzzy