A Review on Analysis on Codes using Different Algorithms

International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering (IJIRAE) ISSN: 2349-2163
Volume 1 Issue 6 (July 2014) http://ijirae.com
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
© 2014, IJIRAE- All Rights Reserved Page - 231
A Review on Analysis on Codes using Different Algorithms
Devansh Vats Gaurav Kochar Rakesh Joon
(ECE/GITAM/MDU) (ECE/GITAM/MDU) (HOD-ECE/GITAM/MDU)
Abstract-Turbo codes are a new class of forward error correcting codes that have proved to give a performance close to the
channel capacity as proposed by C. Shannon. A turbo code encoder is formed by the parallel concatenation of two identical
recursive convolutional encoders separated by an interleaver. The turbo code decoder utilizes two cascaded decoding blocks
where each block in turn share the a priori information produced by the other. The decoding scheme has the benefit to work
iteratively such that the overall performance can be improved. In this paper, a performance analysis of turbo codes is carried.
Two decoding techniques, namely, Log maximum a posteriori probability (Log-MAP) algorithm, and the soft output Viterbi
algorithm (SOVA), which uses log-likelihood ratio to produce soft outputs are used in the performance analysis. The effect of
using different decoding schemes is studied on both punctured and unpunctured codes. Finally, the performance of the two
different decoding techniques is compared in terms of bit error rate. Simulations are carried out with the help of MATLAB
tools. Results indicate that turbo codes outperform the well-accepted convolutional codes with same constraints; however the
best results are given by the unpunctured Log-MAP decoding of turbo codes.
Keywords- Turbo Codes, Interleaver, Log-likelihood Ratio, Iterative Decoding, Log-Maximum a Posteriori Probability
Algorithm, Soft Output Viterbi Algorithm, etc
I. INTRODUCTION
Wireless technologies are the veritable explosions in telecommunication industries. Once exclusively military, satellite and
cellular technologies are now commercially driven by ever more demanding consumers, who are ready for seamless
communication from their home to their car, to their office, or even for outdoor activities. The demand for wireless
communications services has grown tremendously. Although the deployment of 3rd generation cellular systems has been slower
than was first anticipated, researchers are already investigating 4th generation (4G) systems [10, 11]. These systems will transmit
at much higher rates than the actual 2G systems, and even 3G systems, in an ever crowded frequency spectrum. Signals in wireless
communication environments are impaired by fading and multipath delay spread. This leads to a degradation of the overall
performance of the systems. Hence, several avenues are available to mitigate these impairments and fulfil the increasing demands.
With this increased demand comes a growing need to transmit information wirelessly, quickly and accurately. To address this
need, communications engineer have combined technologies suitable for high rate transmission with forward error correction
techniques. Turbo codes are a new class of forward error correcting codes that have proved to give a performance close to the
channel capacity as proposed by C. Shannon [4].
II. TURBO CODE ENCODER
A turbo code is a parallel concatenation of two or more recursive systematic convolutional codes [1-3]. A generalized turbo
encoder is shown in Fig.1
Fig. 1 turbo encoder.
The input of the TC encoder is a data block x, with k information bits. To this information sequence the padding block
appends v (memory size) tail bits, which then yield the sequence c1. This sequence of bits is then fed in parallel into m parallel sets
of interleavers (αi) and encoders [7]. The aim of the interleaver is to scramble the sequence c1 before feeding the output of the
padding block into other constituent encoders [5].

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
III.TURBO CODE DECODER
Turbo codes offer the ability to build powerful codes that utilize a relative simple soft-decision decoding algorithm. This is
possible because the turbo decoder is constructed from two identical serial decoding blocks that share information. The turbo code
decoders often work iteratively (loop wise) by sharing the a priori information obtained from the log-likelihood ratio (a posteriori
information) of the previously cascaded decoder. The constituent decoders are the optimal decoders for the component codes used
by the turbo encoder. Fig.2 gives a visual representation of the iterative and information sharing nature of the decoding strategy.
Fig.2 Turbo decoder
For turbo codes, the Soft Output Viterbi Algorithm (SOVA), and the Log-MAP decoding algorithm can be used as they
produce soft-bit estimates. The Log-MAP decoding scheme is the modified version of the MAP decoding scheme and is
computationally less complex than the original MAP decoding algorithm. However, due to the push for strikingly low bit error
rates, the MAP or the Log-MAP has been most commonly used in turbo codes since they are based on the optimal decoding rule.
In contrast, the SOVA is an approximation to the MAP sequence decoder and will have a slightly worse bit error performance.
Though SOVA suffers from performance degradation as opposed to the Log-MAP decoding rules, it has much reduced
complexity.
IV.MAP ALGORITHM
To first understand the decoding of turbo codes, a preliminary understanding of the MAP algorithm is necessary. The idea
was set out to estimate the a posteriori probabilities of the states and transitions of a Markov sequence transmitted through a
discrete memoryless channel. This work resulted in an algorithm that minimizes symbol error rates while trying to decode block
and trellis codes. The aim of the MAP algorithm is to minimize the symbol error rate for the decoding of trellis and block codes.
Therefore, after receiving the information through the channel, the job of the decoder is to determine the most likely input bits
(original/uncoded information sequence), based on the received symbols. Since the input is over the binary alphabet, it is
conventional to form a log-likelihood ratio (LLR) and base the bit estimates on comparisons based on magnitude of the likelihood
ratio to a threshold. The log-likelihood ratio for the input symbol indexed at time t is defined as
In this expression, P(x t  i | r) is the a posteriori probability of the information bit, x t i, where i {0,1}, when the
knowledge of the received data r is given. The decoder produces estimates of the information bits based on the values of the log-
likelihood ratio. The magnitude of the log-likelihood ratio is defined as the soft output or soft value which can be passed after
processing to the other decoder as a priori information. The estimator obeys the following rule
(A) LOG-MAP DECODING
The Log-MAP decoding algorithm is used which in fact is based on the same idea as the MAP decoding algorithm with the
benefit that it simplifies the computation by eliminating the multiplicative operations and the need to store small values for the
probabilities by including the logarithm operator in the computation [6,9]. The multiplicative operation is computationally more
expensive than the addition operator in terms of processing speed of a microprocessor. Also the requirement of large amount of
memory to store the probabilities in the computation of the log-likelihood ratio makes the implementation of this algorithm
complex. After defining all the entities required in the decoding process the complete decoder structure for Log-MAP algorithm is
shown in Fig. 3
(B) SOVA Decoding
The SOVA decoder also estimates the soft output information for each transmitted symbol in the form of the LLR. In order to
calculate this LLR the algorithm relies on the reliability of the maximum likelihood (ML) chosen path [9]. At each node in the
trellis the absolute difference between the surviving and the competing paths determines the reliability of the decision.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Fig. 3 Log-MAP algorithm
The greater the difference between the survivor and the competing path, the more reliable is the survivor path. For this
reliability calculation, it is assumed that the survivor path’s accumulated metric is always better than the competing accumulated
metric. Furthermore, to reduce complexity, the reliability values only need to be calculated for the ML survivor path and are
unnecessary for the other survivor paths since they will be discarded. The structure of the SOVA decoding algorithm can be
shown in Fig.4
Fig. 4 SOVA decoding
V. SIMULATION RESULTS
The simulation results obtained by using both SOVA and Log- MAP decoding schemes for the additive white Gaussian noise
channel are presented. The effect of puncturing is also studied by simulating the punctured scheme by using odd-even interleaving.
The results for both punctured and unpunctured codes are obtained by simulating the schemes under identical parameters so that a
fair comparison can be made [8].
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
10
-6
10
-5
10
-4
10
-3
10
-2
10
-1
10
0
Bit Error Rate
E
b
/N
0
[dB]
BER
Iteration1
Iteration2
Fig 5 BER plot for log-map decoder: Punctured

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
10
-6
10
-5
10
-4
10
-3
10
-2
10
-1
10
0
Bit Error Rate
E
b
/N
0
[dB]
BER
Iteration1
Iteration2
Fig 6 BER plot for log-map decoder: Unpunctured
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
10
-6
10
-5
10
-4
10
-3
10
-2
10
-1
10
0
Bit Error Rate
Eb
/N0
[dB]
BER
Iteration1
Iteration2
Fig 7 BER plot for SOVA decoder: Punctured
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
10
-6
10
-5
10
-4
10
-3
10
-2
10
-1
10
0
Bit Error Rate
Eb
/N0
[dB]
BER
Iteration1
Iteration2
Fig 8 BER plot for SOVA decoder: Unpunctured

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
From Fig 5 and Fig 6 it is clear that for log Map decoder punctured code degrades the performance of the decoder as
compared to unpunctured code. From Fig7- Fig8 it is clear that for SOVA decoder punctured code degrades the performance of
the decoder as compared to unpunctured code.
From the simulation results we observed that for a fixed turbo encoder the performance of the decoder improves as the data
frame size is increased. This implies that the data frame size is an important factor in the performance of turbo codes and as the
frame size is increased the code gives better performance, which on the other hand is not the case with the conventional Viterbi
decoder. Similarly, an increase in code rate (punctured case) degrades the performance of the decoder as compared to unpunctured
code.
VI.CONCLUSION
Turbo code, a very powerful error correcting coding scheme, which is formed by the parallel concatenation of two recursive
non-systematic convolutional codes, is presented. The simulation results clearly depicts that the code has the capability of
reaching very low bit error rates at even small signal to noise ratios with increasing iterations. The objective of the iterative
process is to further reduce bit errors. However, the evaluation of the number of iterations necessary for optimal results has proven
to be a difficult task. The SOVA decoding scheme has shown less performance than the Log-MAP algorithm and this was
expected due to the fact that the SOVA decoder is an approximation to the MAP decoding scheme and hence suffers from
performance degradation. Although SOVA has the disadvantage of performance degradation, it has the hardware implementation
advantage as it does not require large memory size to store numbers, whereas Log-MAP algorithm despite its superior
performance is prone to memory overflows.
VII. REFERENCES
[1] Joshi, A. , Saini, D.S. , “Performance analysis of coded-OFDM with RS-CC and Turbo codes in various fading environment”
, Information Technology and Multimedia (ICIM), 2011 International Conference on, 14-16 Nov. 2011.
[2] Qazi, S.A. , Kahkashan, S. , “A comparative analysis of power and device utilization of LDPC and Turbo encoders” ,
Information and Communication Technologies (ICICT), 2011 International Conference on, 23-24 July 2011.
[3] Adnan, T. , Masood, A. , “Use of convolution coding for improving SER performance of OFDM system” , Communication
Software and Networks (ICCSN), 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on, 27-29 May 2011.
[4] Zhang Xinyu , “A basic research on Forward Error Correction”, Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), 2011 IEEE
3rd International Conference on, 27-29 May 2011.
[5] Soni, S.K. , Chauhan, P.S. ; Vasudevan, K. ; Shanker, Y. , “Turbo decoding in ISI channels” Emerging Trends in Networks
and Computer Communications (ETNCC), 2011 International Conference on, 22-24 April 2011.
[6] Abhishek, Kumar, S., Chakrabarti, S. ,“ Performance Evaluation of Asymmetric Turbo Codes Using Log-MAP Decoding
Technique ” , Devices and Communications (ICDeCom), 2011 International Conference, Page 1 – 5, 24-25 Feb. 2011.
[7] Saul, L.-S.; Francisco, G.-L., “A comparative study for turbo code interleavers designed for short frame size and relatively
high SNR channel”, 5th
international IEEE Conference, 2011.
[8] Jiaxiang Li; Qingchun Chen; Suyue Gao; Zheng Ma; Pingzhi Fan, “The optimal puncturing pattern design for rate-compatible
punctured Turbo codes”, international IEEE Conference , 2009.
[9] Jinhong Wu; Vojcic, B.R., “Combining iterative SOVA and Log-MAP algorithms for turbo decoding”, Information Sciences
and Systems, 43rd
IEEE Conference,2009..
[10] Theodore S. Rappaport, “Wireless Communications”, Prentice Hall, 2002.
[11] J. G. Proakis, “Digital Communications”, McGraw Hill, 2002.

A Review on Analysis on Codes using Different Algorithms

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (19)

Similar to A Review on Analysis on Codes using Different Algorithms (20)

More from AM Publications (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

A Review on Analysis on Codes using Different Algorithms