Academia letters ts_2021

ACADEMIA Letters
An observer-oriented theory with distorted time, or a
system-oriented theory with universal time.
Tuomo Suntola, Physics Foundations Society
We are taught to think that the description of relativistic phenomena requires distorted time
and distance. The message of this paper is that in a holistic perspective, time and distance are
universal coordinate quantities, and relativity is a direct consequence of the conservation of
energy. Instead of the kinematics/metrics-based approach of the theory of relativity, a holistic
approach starts from the dynamics of space as a whole and expresses relativity in terms of
locally available energy instead of locally distorted time and distance. In such an approach,
e.g., the frequency of atomic clocks at different states of motion and gravitation is obtained
from the quantum mechanical solution of the characteristic frequencies, and the unique status
of the speed of light becomes understood via its linkage to the dynamics of space.
In an observer-oriented solution by kinematics and metrics, the speed of light and the rest
mass of particles are conserved » time and distance are functions of motion and gravitation
relative to the observer which makes, e.g., clocks measure different time in moving frames.
In a system-oriented solution by dynamics, time and distance are universal coordinate
quantities, and the total energy in space is conserved » the rest energy of mass particles is
a function of local motion and gravitation, which makes, based on the quantum mechanical
solution, the frequency of atomic clocks a function of motion and gravitation.
From space-time to universal time and metric fourth dimension
In the spacetime concept, line element in the fourth dimension is ds = c�dt, the speed of light
c times a time differential dt. The fourth dimension is called time but measured in meters
[(m/s)�s=m]. Honoring the dimensions, rather than 14 billion years of time, we are at a dis-
Academia Letters, August 2021
Corresponding Author: Tuomo Suntola, tuomo.suntola@gmail.com
Citation: Suntola, T. (2021). An observer-oriented theory with distorted time, or a system-oriented theory with
universal time. Academia Letters, Article 3416. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3416.
1
©2021 by the author — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0

tance of 14 billion lightyears from a starting point. Such a starting point is common to all mat-
ter in space, which means that the observable three-dimensional space forms a hypersphere
with the radius of 14 billion lightyears increasing at the speed of light in the fourth dimension.
The barycenter of the three-dimensional space is not in space but at the center of the hyper-
sphere in the fourth dimension. Space as the expanding hypersphere offers a system-oriented
perspective as an alternative to the observer-oriented perspective of the relativity theory.
The dynamics of spherically closed space can be solved as that of a spherical pendulum;
instead of an instant explosion, the big bang, matter in space has got its energy as the energy of
motion against the release of gravitational energy in a contraction phase before the singularity
turning the contraction into the ongoing expansion. The pendulum solution shows the rest
energy of matter as the energy of motion in the fourth dimension balanced by the gravitational
energy arising from the barycenter representing the total mass in space.
Maintaining the zero-energy balance, the buildup of local structures in space converts
part of the momentum and the energy of motion in the fourth dimension into momentum and
kinetic energy in space via local bending of space. Such a process occurs in several steps
creating a system of nested energy frames linking the local states of motion and gravitation
to the state at rest in hypothetical homogeneous space. The “deeper” objects are in local
structures, the higher share of their energy is bound to local motion and gravitation which is
observed as reduced rates of internal physical processes like the ticking rate of atomic clocks.
There is no need for a separate relativity theory, relativity appears a direct consequence of the
conservation of energy - with time and distance as universal coordinate quantities.
Historical perspective
The Copernican revolution disclosed the structure of the planetary system enabling the study
of physical interactions in the system. The system-oriented heliocentric perspective replaced
the observer-oriented geocentric Ptolemaic perspective. By analogy, as an alternative to the
observer-oriented perspective of the relativity theory, space as hypersphere offers a system-
oriented perspective to whole space and allows a straightforward derivation of the dynamics
of the contraction-expansion process as well as predictions for cosmological observables and
celestial mechanics. The holistic perspective allows major simplification of the cosmological
picture and mathematics, without compromising the accuracy of predictions.
Both the zero-energy principle and spherically closed space are well-known ideas. A hy-
persphere was Einstein’s original idea of the cosmological picture of general relativity [1].
The zero-energy universe has been proposed by Dennis Sciama [2] and Pascal Jordan. Com-
bining the two is problematic without the fourth dimension of metric nature.
2

In his lectures on gravitation in the early 1960s, Richard Feynman introduced spherically
closed space as an intriguing suggestion [3] giving a natural explanation to the symmetry of
the expansion of space. Also, he pondered the equality of the total gravitational energy and
rest energy in space as a great mystery [4] but did not link the idea to spherically closed space.
A detailed analysis of the dynamics of spherically closed space is presented as the Dy-
namic Universe (DU) model [5]. DU can be seen as a detailed solution combining Feyn-
man’s “great mystery” of zero-energy space to the “intriguing suggestion of spherically closed
space”. Such a solution does not work in the framework of the theory of relativity which is
based on the constancy of the speed of light, and time as the fourth dimension. The dynamic
solution requires universal time and a metric fourth dimension that allow velocity and momen-
tum equally in the fourth dimension and the three space dimensions. Everything in DU-space
is interrelated. The speed of light, as well as the rates of most physical processes, are related to
the velocity of space in the local fourth dimension. The energy structure of space is described
as a system of nested energy frames with hypothetical homogeneous space as the universal
frame of reference to all local frames in space. The wavelike mass substance offers a basis for
the ontology behind quantum mechanics.
The choice
The theory of relativity postulates the constancy of the speed of light and the rest mass. As
a consequence, for describing relativistic effects, time and distance are distorted in frames in
motion or at a different gravitational potential relative to the observer. In the theory of rela-
tivity, distorted time and distance are authorized by the postulated relativity principle which
establishes the observer-oriented perspective.
The holistic perspective based on a hypersphere contracting and expanding with the ener-
gies of motion and gravitation in balance relies on the zero-energy principle with early roots
in Aristotle’s entelecheia, the actualization of potentiality. Time and distance are used as uni-
versal coordinate quantities essential for human comprehension [6]. Mass is the substance for
the expression of energy; mass was energized in the contraction phase preceding the ongoing
expansion phase.
Both approaches produce precise predictions. The choice is philosophical - nature is not
dependent on the way we describe it.
3

References
1. A. Einstein, Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitäts-theorie, Sitzungs-
berichte der Preussischen Akad. d. Wissenschaften (1917).
2. D.W. Sciama, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 113 34−42 (1953).
3. R. Feynman, W. Morinigo, and W. Wagner, Feynman Lectures on Gravitation (during
the academic year 1962-63), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, p. 164 (1995).
4. R. Feynman, W. Morinigo, and W. Wagner, Feynman Lectures on Gravitation (during
the academic year 1962-63), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, p. 10 (1995).
5. T. Suntola, The Dynamic Universe: Toward a unified picture of physical reality, fourth
edition, Physics Foundations Society, Espoo, Finland (2018), Academia.
6. A. Styrman, Relativity vs. Absolute Simultaneity: Varying Flow of Time or Varying Fre-
quency? Physics Essays 31(3), July 2018, DOI: 10.4006/0836-1398-31.3.256 (2018),
Academia.
4

Academia letters ts_2021

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Academia letters ts_2021 (20)

More from chebichev (6)

Recently uploaded (20)

Academia letters ts_2021