Activities And Resources In Online Learning From A Critical Thinking View
0 likes10 views
This document summarizes a study that investigated the relationship between online learning and critical thinking in an undergraduate online introductory computer literacy course. The study aimed to identify which parts of the course's learning modules (resources and activities) contributed most to developing students' critical thinking skills. A survey of 490 students found that interactive course components like assignments and projects were perceived to contribute more to critical thinking than static resources like textbooks. Assignments had the strongest perceived impact, followed by an Excel mini case project. Overall, results indicated students viewed interactive elements as contributing more to critical thinking development than non-interactive content, assessment, or projects. The findings suggest online course designers should focus on incorporating interactive elements to foster critical thinking skills.
Activities And Resources In Online Learning From A Critical Thinking View
- 1. Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (InSITE) 2012 Activities and Resources in Online Learning: From a Critical Thinking View Danielle Morin Concordia University, John Molson School of Business, Montreal, Quebec, Canada dmorin@jmsb.concordia.ca Jennifer D. E. Thomas Pace University, Ivan Seidenberg School of CSIS, New York, NY, USA jthomas@pace.edu Raafat George Saadé Concordia University, John Molson School of Business, Montreal, Quebec, Canada rsaade@jmsb.concordia.ca Abstract This article investigates the relationship between Web-based learning and Critical thinking (CT) in a web-based course on the fundamentals of Information Technology at a university in Mont- real, Canada. In particular, it will identify what part(s) of the course and to what extent, critical thinking is perceived to occur. The course contains two categories of learning modules namely resources and interactive activity components. The study aimed at answering the following ques- tions: (1) What is the effect of the learning modules on Critical Thinking? and (2) What is the relative contribution of the various learning modules on Critical Thinking skills requirements? Keywords: Critical Thinking, Online Learning Background It is widely accepted that for students to perform well in the future careers, they must acquire skills and absorb knowledge efficiently and effectively. The acquisition, understanding, and use of knowledge require various learning strategies, meta-cognitive skills and the desire to use them. Critical thinking is a key skill that individuals need in order to succeed (Johnson et al., 2010). In our information society today, critical thinking is regarded as the most important skill in order to discern false, incomplete, obsolete, etc. information. The Internet has become the open medium to hold all types of information. While our understanding of critical thinking has improved significantly in the last two decades, a range of views about its complex structure and many areas of uncertainty and disagreements still re- main. Yang (2007) provides a good per- spective on those issues between cogni- tive scientists, educational researchers and philosophers. The body of knowl- edge is relatively small and limited in context and most of CT types of studies Material published as part of this publication, either on-line or in print, is copyrighted by the Informing Science Institute. Permission to make digital or paper copy of part or all of these works for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage AND that copies 1) bear this notice in full and 2) give the full citation on the first page. It is per- missible to abstract these works so long as credit is given. To copy in all other cases or to republish or to post on a server or to redistribute to lists requires specific permission and payment of a fee. Contact Publisher@InformingScience.org to request redistribution permission. This paper was accepted through blinded executive review
- 2. Activities and Resources in Online Learning is related to elementary and high school education excluding the context of IT usage and CT (Marin & Halpern, 2011). There are several definitions of critical thinking (and instruments for its measurement), but there seems to be some common grounds around the ideas of analysis, evaluation, inference, and inter- pretation of CT. Follman et al., (1997) provides a comprehensive list and associated discussion. In our study presented in this article, we define critical thinking around this simpler construct as follows: “critical thinking is the process of analysis, evaluation, inference, and interpretation of resources and activities (gathered via online experiences with course material).” Students were asked to identify the extent to which they felt various activities, resources and technologies (Thomas, 2001), were perceived to support their acquisition of these skills so defined, in an en- tirely virtual, online course. Considering the scarce body of research work on CT in virtual learning environments, this study provides two significant contributions: (1) At a macro level, obtain some understanding on CT in the online learning context (higher education), and (2) At a micro level, identify the kinds of re- sources and activities that fosters/require CT skills. With this knowledge, practitioners (teachers and online courses designers) can design and implement better online (web-based) courses by integrating learning tools to foster the development of CT skills. Critical Thinking and Web-Based Learning Environments Critical thinking is certainly an important skill to foster in students engaged in the learning proc- ess, for both their professional and personal prosperity (Noll & Wilkins, 2003). An examination of the virtual learning environment literature does not however indicate consensus on how to fos- ter this skill, nor with what modes of deliver, nor how demographics may mediate the outcomes. It is acknowledged that in the online environment, the challenge is even greater than in the tradi- tional setting. Constraints on the development of critical thinking in virtual environments seems more daunting than in the traditional classroom setting, due to the lack in the body of knowledge regarding the integration of creative instructional strategies, such as constructivist learning philosophies, active learning, team-based learning, and discussion using digital media. MacKnight, (2000) expressed an important pitfall in that "we fall prey to modern communication media, which present a world where the prepackaging of intellectual positions and views is so ingenious that thinking seems unnecessary." On the other hand, some researchers suggest online can actually help by giving students opportunities for mastery learning, removal of time-constraints for learning, self-paced learning, anonymous online discussion, etc. (Benson & Samarawickrema, 2009). This complex context (critical thinking in virtual environments) (Saade, He and Kira, 2007) sets the backdrop for the study presented herein which surveys students’ perceptions of the critical thinking skills they may have acquired and/or used via the resources and activities of an entirely online course. Methodology Davis (1989) has shown that system use is tied to user’s perceptions, while Keengwe (2007) and Koohang & Durante (2003) found that a relationship exists between students’ personal computer proficiency and students’ perceptions of the effect of computer technology to improve their learn- ing. Song, et al. (2004) focused on students’ perceptions as a way to improve online or distance learning. Perceptions are, therefore, important considerations when integrating technology into learning, especially virtual learning (Thomas and Morin, 2010). Consequently, the survey used in our study measures the subjective evaluation of the students’ use and/or development of critical thinking while interacting with the course resources, activities and technologies 598
- 3. Morin, Thomas, & Saadé The Course This research investigates what observations could be made about students’ acquisition of one aspect of higher-order learning, namely critical thinking, from the perspective of students’ per- ceptions and performance in an undergraduate online introductory computer literacy course. In such a course, students are required to demonstrate acquisition of lower level skills, such as re- membering concepts as well as keystrokes in software, and additionally, how to think critically about the problems which the software is being used to solve. Learning in the course is supported by various activities and resources, as well technology, as presented in Table 1, below. Some of those items can be classified as a learning activity, while others refer to the learning content. We also distinguished between static (tangible and digital) and interactive learning. Table1. Characteristics of course components. Learning Activity Learning Content Static Interactive Activities Assignments Excel mini case (project) Access mini case (project) Quiz EISEL Resources Textbook Online book chapters Overall online system Material on the Web The Survey This course is offered completely online without any face-to-face interaction with the professor or the teaching assistants. At the end of the semester, students were asked to respond to an online survey as candidly as possible. The survey used in this study is based on an instrument developed by the third author (Thomas, 2001). Students were instructed that there were no right or wrong answers and that only their beliefs and perceptions about the course components and their experi- ences with the different tools for learning were requested. Discussion and Analysis of Results Demographics and Definition Understanding There were a total of 985 students enrolled in the course and 490 of them completed the survey online for a response rate of 51.2%. Of those who completed the survey, 44% were female stu- dents. Most respondents (73.3%) were in the 20-23 age group, 17.4% in the 24-30 age group and 4% and 5.3% were in the below 20 and above 30 categories, respectively. The average age is 22.7 599
- 4. Activities and Resources in Online Learning years, while the median is 22. We also note that approximately 86% of students claimed to have average to excellent understanding of the definition of critical thinking as proposed. Students ‘Perceived Contribution of Activities and Resources In Table 2 below, descriptive statistics, and the distribution of students’ perception of the contri- butions of activities/resources, to Critical Thinking Skills, in percentages are presented. This dis- tribution provides us with a measure of the perceived relative influence of course elements (ac- tivities/resources) on the development of critical thinking skills. The Table also presents the Posi- tive impact of each activities / resources defined as the total proportion of answers in the catego- ries ‘Moderate’ and ‘A lot’. The results in Table 2 clearly show that approximately 74% of the students bought the physical textbook and about half of them, 52%, felt that its perceived contri- bution to critical thinking skills is moderate. Moreover, it is clearly evident that students felt the activities contributed more, compared to resources, to critical thinking. In terms of the strongest positive impact, Assignments are perceived as having contributed the most, followed by the Excel mini case project. Table 2. Distribution of student perception (%) of contribution to critical thinking skills. N Mea n S.D. Not at all1 (%) Moder- ate2 (%) A lot3 (%) Positive Im- pact (%) Activities Assignments 483 2.20 0.69 15.7 48.0 36.3 84.3 Excel mini case (project) 488 2.21 0.72 17.8 43.5 38.7 82.2 Access mini case (pro- ject) 483 2.18 0.70 18.6 45.1 36.3 81.4 Quiz 488 2.18 0.73 19.3 43.6 37.1 80.7 EISEL 486 2.13 0.72 20.6 46.3 33.1 79.4 Resources Textbook 361 1.95 0.69 26.6 52.1 21.3 73.4 Online book chapters 485 1.90 0.67 28.0 54.0 17.9 71.9 Overall online system 485 2.07 0.70 21.2 50.9 27.8 78.7 Material on the Web 489 2.10 0.68 18.6 52.6 28.8 81.4 An overall ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer analysis were performed and it was found that students view the contributions of the ‘Textbook ‘and the ‘Online Book’ as significantly less than all ac- tivities in the course. The resource contributing the most to critical thinking skills was perceived to be “Material on the Web”. Conclusions Results clearly indicate that the relationship between students’ perception of learning activities and critical thinking is stronger than that with resources. More specifically, interactive compo- nents, regardless of their nature (learning activity / resources), were perceived to contribute to CT 600
- 5. Morin, Thomas, & Saadé more than other identified types such as static content, assessment and project-based. Putting everything together, it seems that the world of books for learning is fading away. Our experience, and our attempt in this study to quantify the relative importance of books, whether if they exist in physical or digital form, indicates that for any content to be perceived as contributing to thinking it must be presented in an interactive mode. When it comes to critical thinking, interactivity was shown to rank at the level of assignments (actually slightly higher), to solve a business problem using software (EXCEL and ACCESS) as a tool. From a practical perspective, designers and teachers of online courses have one primary goal, which is to enhance the student’s learning experience – this includes learning and behavior. Criti- cal thinking skills are important for the careers for which students are being prepared, in an area in which obsolescence is an ongoing threat in the digital world, given the speed at which technol- ogy changes. Without these skills and the ability to adapt to new innovations in technology, the student will be severely disadvantaged. More research is therefore needed to better understand the relationship between course activities, resources and technologies employed, and their impact on critical thinking development. References Benson, R., & Samarawickrema, G. (2009). Addressing the context of e-learning: Using transactional dis- tance theory to inform design. Distance Education, 30, 5-21. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance in information tech- nology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. Follman, J., Lavely, C., & Berger, N. (1997). Inventory of instruments of critical thinking. Informal Logic, 18(2 & 3), 261-267. Johnson, T. E., Archibald, T. N., & Tenenbaum, G. (2010). Individual and team annotation effects on stu- dents' reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills. Computers in Human Be- havior, 26, 1496-1507. Keengwe, J. (2007). Faculty integration of technology into instruction and students’ perceptions of com- puter technology to improve student learning. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 169- 180. Koohang, A., & Durante, A. (2003). Learners’ perceptions toward the web-based distance learning activi- ties/assignments portion of an undergraduate hybrid instructional model. Journal of Information Tech- nology Education, 2, 105-113. MacKnight, C. B. (2000) Teaching critically about critical thinking through online discussions. EDU- CAUSE Quarterly, 4, 38-41. Mandernach, B. J. (2006). Thinking critically about critical thinking: Integrating online tools to promote critical thinking. Critical Thinking - Insight: A Collection of Faculty Scholarship, 1, 41-50. Noll, C. L., & Wilkins, M. (2002). Critical skills of IS professionals: A model for curriculum development. Journal of Information Technology Education, 1(3), 144-154. Saadé, G. R., He, X., & Kira, D. (2007). Exploring dimensions to online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1721-1739. Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet & Higher Education, 7(1), 59-70. Thomas, J. D. E. (2001). Technology integration and higher-order learning. Proceedings of Conference in Advanced Technology in Education Conference, Banff, Calgary, Canada, May. Thomas, J. D. E. & Morin, D. (2010). Technological supports for onsite and distance education and stu- dents’ perceptions of acquisition of thinking and team-building skills, International Journal of Dis- tance Education Technologies, 8(2), 1-13. 601
- 6. Activities and Resources in Online Learning 602 lish Department. products. Yang, C. Y. (2008). A catalyst for teaching critical thinking in a large university class in Taiwan: asyn- chronous online discussions with the facilitation of teaching assistants. Educational Technology Re- search and Development, 56, 241-264. Biographies Dr. Danielle Morin is a Professor at the John Molson School of Business at Concordia Univer- sity, Montreal, Canada. She received a BSc in Mathematics and MSc Statistics from Université de Montréal, and a PhD in Statistics from McGill University. Her major academic interests are business statistics and multivariate statistics, which she has taught in both graduate and undergraduate programs. Her current research interests are focused on university education, namely the impact on technology integration and interdisciplinary on student's learning and acquisition of higher order skills. Over the years, Dr Morin has held several senior administrative positions at Concordia University. In 2005, she was awarded the YWCA Women of Excellence Award in the Education Category as well as the Concordia Alumni Recognition Award for teaching excel- lence. Jennifer D.E. Thomas is Professor of Information Systems at Pace University in New York City in the Seidenberg School of Computer Science and Information Systems. She received her Ph.D. and M.B.A. from Concordia University in Montreal, Canada, and her Bachelor of Commerce from McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Her research interests include Knowledge Management, User Experience - Human Factors, Human-Computer Interaction, Multimedia, and the Impact of Technology Integration on Learning. She teaches onsite and online courses at both the graduate and undergraduate levels – Introduction to Information Systems Concepts, User Experience – Multimedia and Human Computer Interaction, Business Telecommunications, Distrib- uted Computing, and Research Methodology. She also previously co- taught an undergraduate Beowulf and Multimedia course with the Eng- Dr. Raafat George Saadé has been teaching in the faculty since 1998. He obtained his Ph.D. in 1995 (Concordia University) after which he received the Canadian National Research Council postdoctoral fellow- ship, which he completed at McGill University in Montreal. Dr. Saade has published in journals such as Information & Management, Deci- sion Sciences, and Expert Systems with Applications. His research in- terests include the development and assessment of information sys- tems, and the supply chain of digital information