SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Advanced Filtration Processes
Unit-3
Introduction
• Filtration: Water flows through a filter designed to remove particles from
samples. The filters are made of layers of sand and gravel, and in some
cases, crushed anthracite.
• Filtration collects the suspended impurities in water, enhancing the
effectiveness of disinfection.
• Activated carbon filtration is most effective at removing or reducing
impurities and contaminants such as chlorine, sediment, volatile organic
compounds, bad taste and odour from water, etc.
• The difference between carbon filtration and reverse osmosis is the
presence of the high-quality reverse osmosis membrane. (
https://youtu.be/4RDA_B_dRQ0).
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Cont.…
• Filtration is a key unit operation in water reclamation, providing a separation
of suspended and colloidal particles, including microorganisms, from water.
• The three main purposes of filtration are to (1) allow more effective
disinfection; (2) provide pretreatment for subsequent advanced treatment
steps, such as carbon adsorption, membrane filtration, or chemical oxidation;
and (3) remove chemically precipitated phosphorus.
• At larger reuse facilities (>1,000 m3
/d), mono/dual-media filters are most
commonly used for filtration with gravity or pressure as the driving force.
• Both mono/dual-media filters using sand and anthracite have typical filtration
rates between (4,900–14,600 L/m2
per hour) while achieving effluent
turbidities between 0.3 and 4 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU).
Cont.…
• Membrane filters, such as microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF), are
surface filtration devices, with pore sizes in the range from 0.1 and 10 µm
for MF and 0.005 to 0.1 μm for UF.
• In addition to removing suspended matter, MF and UF can remove large
organic molecules, large colloidal particles, and many microorganisms.
• The advantages of membrane filtration as compared with conventional
filtration are the smaller space requirements, reduced labour requirements,
ease of process automation, and more effective pathogen removal.
• An additional advantage is the generation of a consistent effluent quality
with respect to suspended matter and pathogens.
• This treatment usually results in effluent turbidities well below 1 NTU.
• The drawbacks of this technology are potentially higher capital costs, the
limited life span of membranes requiring replacement, the complexity of the
operation, and the potential for irreversible membrane fouling that reduces
productivity.
Advanced filtration techniques include the following:
• Reverse osmosis (RO): In this process, water moves through a membrane with pores that
block the passage of molecules larger than water.
• RO is the most commonly used advanced filtration method, produces water of especially
high purity, and is vital to desalination, water recycling, and wastewater treatment.
• Nanofiltration, microfiltration, and ultrafiltration: These are all membrane processes
similar to reverse osmosis. All three processes operate on roughly the same principle, though
each is best suited for removing contaminant particles of different sizes. For example,
microfiltration is best used with fresh water, because the contaminants found in it are of
larger size than those found in saltwater, for which reverse osmosis is most often used.
Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration
• MF and UF membrane processes can be configured using pressurized or submerged
membrane modules.
• In the pressurized configuration, a pump is used to pressurize the feedwater and
circulate it through the membrane.
• In a submerged system, membrane elements are immersed in the feedwater tank, and
permeate is withdrawn through the membrane by applying a vacuum.
• The key operational parameter that determines the efficiency of MF and UF
membranes and operating costs is flux, which is the rate of water flow volume per
membrane area.
• Factors affecting the flux rate include the applied pressure, fouling potential, and
reclaimed water characteristics.
• Typically, MF and UF processes operate at flux rates ranging from 48 to 190 L/m2
per hour.
Cont.…
• An ultrafiltration filter has a pore size of around 0.01 microns. A
microfiltration filter has a pore size of around 0.1 microns, so when water
undergoes microfiltration, many microorganisms are removed, but viruses
remain in the water. Ultrafiltration would remove these larger particles and
may remove some viruses
• However, filtration efficiencies vary with the type of membrane and the
physical and chemical characteristics of the wastewater, resulting in a wide
range of removal efficiencies for pathogens.
• MF and certain UF membranes should not be relied upon for the complete
removal of viruses for several reasons.
• Nevertheless, it is generally believed that the new filtration systems have
significantly improved performance for microbial removal.
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Cont.…..
• Combining MF with chlorination is likely to improve the rate of virus
removal.
• MF and UF membranes sometimes in combination with coagulation can
also physically retain large dissolved organic molecules and colloidal
particles.
• Effluent organic matter and hydrophobic trace organic chemicals can also
adsorb to MF and UF membranes, but this initial adsorption capacity is
quickly exhausted.
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis
• For reuse projects that require the removal of dissolved solids and trace organic
chemicals and where consistent water quality is desired, the use of integrated
membrane systems incorporating MF or UF followed by NF or RO can be required.
• RO and NF are pressure-driven membrane processes that separate dissolved
constituents from a feed stream into a concentrate and permeate stream.
• Treating reclaimed water with RO and NF membranes usually results in product water
recoveries of 70 to 85 %.
• Thus, the use of NF or RO results in a net loss of water resources through the disposal
of the brine concentrate.
• RO applications in water reuse have been favored in coastal settings where the RO
concentrate can be conveniently discharged to the ocean.
• Thus, existing inland water reuse installations employing RO membranes are limited
in capacity and commonly discharge brine to the sewer or a receiving stream provided
that there is enough dilution capacity.
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Cont.…
• Most commonly used RO and NF membranes provide apparent molecular weight cutoffs of less
than 150 and 300 Daltons, respectively, and are therefore highly efficient in the removal of
organic matter and selective for trace organic chemicals.
• Some of the organic constituents that are only partially removed by NF and RO membranes are
low-molecular-weight organic acids as well as certain disinfection byproducts.
• Recent advances in membrane development have resulted in low-pressure RO membranes and
NF membranes that can be operated at significantly lower feed pressure while providing
approximately the same product water quality.
• However, certain monovalent ions (e.g., Cl–
, Na+
, NO3
–
) are only partially rejected by NF, and
NF membranes result in product water with higher TDS than RO.
• Nowadays, most integrated membrane systems applied in reuse employ RO rather than NF.
• However, certain low-pressure NF membranes offer opportunities for wider applications in water
reclamation projects because they have lower energy requirements and can achieve selective
rejection of salts and organic constituents that results in less concentrated brine streams.
Cont..
• For wastewater applications, RO and ultra-low-pressure RO membrane
facilities typically operate at feed pressures between 1,000 and 2,100 kPa in
order to produce between 13.5 and 20 L/m2
per hour of permeate.
Substances and contaminants are nominally removed by pressure-
driven membrane processes
Cont.….
Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights
Video 1: What is reverse osmosis?
Video 2: How does RO work?
Tasks
Cont.…
Question. Estimate the quantity and quality of the waste stream, and the total
quantity of water that must be processed, from a reverse osmosis facility that is
to produce 4000 m3
/d of water to be used for industrial cooling operations.
Assume that both the recovery and rejection rates are equal to 90 % and that
the concentration of the feed stream is 400 g/m3
.
Thanks

More Related Content

PPTX
Membrane Filtration & Insights into water purification.pptx
PPTX
Membrane Filtration & its role in water purification.pptx
PPTX
Membrane Filtration & Insights to water purification.pptx
PPTX
ENS 37.pptx
PPTX
Membrane based water purification technology(ultra filteration,dialysis and e...
PPTX
LOW-COST & LOW-RISK SOLUTIONS IN WATER TREATMENT, RECYCLING, AND REUSE
PDF
Paper id 23201432
PDF
The Membrane Filtration of wastestream.pdf
Membrane Filtration & Insights into water purification.pptx
Membrane Filtration & its role in water purification.pptx
Membrane Filtration & Insights to water purification.pptx
ENS 37.pptx
Membrane based water purification technology(ultra filteration,dialysis and e...
LOW-COST & LOW-RISK SOLUTIONS IN WATER TREATMENT, RECYCLING, AND REUSE
Paper id 23201432
The Membrane Filtration of wastestream.pdf

Similar to Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights (20)

PDF
The Membrane Filtration of wastestream.pdf
PDF
The Membrane Filtration of wastestream.pdf
PPTX
Water recycling & membrane technology
PPTX
Ultra filtration and reverse osmosis
DOCX
Between uf and ro
DOCX
Between uf and ro
PPT
Chapter 2. Membrane technologies for Industrial Wastewaters Treatment.ppt
PPTX
Microfiltration
PPT
13 membranes
PPTX
Membrane filtration by Akram Hossain, Food and Process Engineering, HSTU
PDF
Membrane technology
PPTX
Tertiary treatment
PPTX
Membrane Processing and its application in food industry.
PPT
membrane process & different application in filtration
PPTX
Membrane Separation Processes
PPT
membgka.ppt
PDF
Berrigan- Nitrate-Removal_April-7-2016-Minnesota-AWWA-Metro-District
PDF
Membrane technology
PPTX
Nanofiltration
PDF
A review of pressure driven
The Membrane Filtration of wastestream.pdf
The Membrane Filtration of wastestream.pdf
Water recycling & membrane technology
Ultra filtration and reverse osmosis
Between uf and ro
Between uf and ro
Chapter 2. Membrane technologies for Industrial Wastewaters Treatment.ppt
Microfiltration
13 membranes
Membrane filtration by Akram Hossain, Food and Process Engineering, HSTU
Membrane technology
Tertiary treatment
Membrane Processing and its application in food industry.
membrane process & different application in filtration
Membrane Separation Processes
membgka.ppt
Berrigan- Nitrate-Removal_April-7-2016-Minnesota-AWWA-Metro-District
Membrane technology
Nanofiltration
A review of pressure driven
Ad

More from Saif Khan (10)

PPTX
Electrocoagulation for treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater- A CASE STUDY.pptx
PPTX
Environmental damage caused by Micropollutant.pptx
PPTX
AIR POLLUTION ISSUES & WAYS TO CONTROL.pptx
PPTX
water treatment & its importance-introduction.pptx
PPTX
17 sustainable development goals SDG.pptx
PPTX
climatechange-240310145757-f223a4fc edited.pptx
PPTX
plastic pollution & its impact on health.pptx
PPTX
water conflicts and claims arising due to water shortages
PDF
ECOSYSTEM Classification Structure & Functioning (1).pdf
PDF
Bioremediation as a treatment method.pdf
Electrocoagulation for treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater- A CASE STUDY.pptx
Environmental damage caused by Micropollutant.pptx
AIR POLLUTION ISSUES & WAYS TO CONTROL.pptx
water treatment & its importance-introduction.pptx
17 sustainable development goals SDG.pptx
climatechange-240310145757-f223a4fc edited.pptx
plastic pollution & its impact on health.pptx
water conflicts and claims arising due to water shortages
ECOSYSTEM Classification Structure & Functioning (1).pdf
Bioremediation as a treatment method.pdf
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Bai bao Minh chứng sk2-DBTrong-003757.pdf
PPTX
Unit 1 - Environmental management, politics and.pptx
PPTX
TERI-Lighting-the-Way-to-a-Sustainable-Future.pptx
PPTX
Biodiversity of nature in environmental studies.pptx
DOCX
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Crude Oil Large-Scale Raw Oil Containment...
PPTX
Plant_Cell_Presentation.pptx.com learning purpose
PPTX
Arugula. Crop used for medical plant in kurdistant
PPTX
AUTO IRRIGATION USING GRID SYSTEM123.pptx
PDF
Global Natural Disasters in H1 2025 by Beinsure
PDF
Effective factors on adoption of intercropping and it’s role on development o...
PPTX
Corporate Social Responsibility & Governance
DOCX
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Agricultural Waste Biogas Digesters Turns...
PDF
Cave Diggers Simplified cave survey methods and mapping
PPT
Environmental pollution for educational study
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Bio-gas Tanks Reliable containment for biofuel gas....
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Biogas Tanks Securely store produced biogas.docx
PPTX
RadiationSafetyPt120252026nucchemis.pptx
PPTX
Conformity-and-Deviance module 7 ucsp grade 12
DOCX
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Farm Digesters Supports On-Farm Organic W...
PDF
FMM Slides For OSH Management Requirement
Bai bao Minh chứng sk2-DBTrong-003757.pdf
Unit 1 - Environmental management, politics and.pptx
TERI-Lighting-the-Way-to-a-Sustainable-Future.pptx
Biodiversity of nature in environmental studies.pptx
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Crude Oil Large-Scale Raw Oil Containment...
Plant_Cell_Presentation.pptx.com learning purpose
Arugula. Crop used for medical plant in kurdistant
AUTO IRRIGATION USING GRID SYSTEM123.pptx
Global Natural Disasters in H1 2025 by Beinsure
Effective factors on adoption of intercropping and it’s role on development o...
Corporate Social Responsibility & Governance
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Agricultural Waste Biogas Digesters Turns...
Cave Diggers Simplified cave survey methods and mapping
Environmental pollution for educational study
Double Membrane Roofs for Bio-gas Tanks Reliable containment for biofuel gas....
Double Membrane Roofs for Biogas Tanks Securely store produced biogas.docx
RadiationSafetyPt120252026nucchemis.pptx
Conformity-and-Deviance module 7 ucsp grade 12
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Farm Digesters Supports On-Farm Organic W...
FMM Slides For OSH Management Requirement

Advanced Filtration Processes & Insights

  • 2. Introduction • Filtration: Water flows through a filter designed to remove particles from samples. The filters are made of layers of sand and gravel, and in some cases, crushed anthracite. • Filtration collects the suspended impurities in water, enhancing the effectiveness of disinfection. • Activated carbon filtration is most effective at removing or reducing impurities and contaminants such as chlorine, sediment, volatile organic compounds, bad taste and odour from water, etc. • The difference between carbon filtration and reverse osmosis is the presence of the high-quality reverse osmosis membrane. ( https://youtu.be/4RDA_B_dRQ0).
  • 8. Cont.… • Filtration is a key unit operation in water reclamation, providing a separation of suspended and colloidal particles, including microorganisms, from water. • The three main purposes of filtration are to (1) allow more effective disinfection; (2) provide pretreatment for subsequent advanced treatment steps, such as carbon adsorption, membrane filtration, or chemical oxidation; and (3) remove chemically precipitated phosphorus. • At larger reuse facilities (>1,000 m3 /d), mono/dual-media filters are most commonly used for filtration with gravity or pressure as the driving force. • Both mono/dual-media filters using sand and anthracite have typical filtration rates between (4,900–14,600 L/m2 per hour) while achieving effluent turbidities between 0.3 and 4 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU).
  • 9. Cont.… • Membrane filters, such as microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF), are surface filtration devices, with pore sizes in the range from 0.1 and 10 µm for MF and 0.005 to 0.1 μm for UF. • In addition to removing suspended matter, MF and UF can remove large organic molecules, large colloidal particles, and many microorganisms. • The advantages of membrane filtration as compared with conventional filtration are the smaller space requirements, reduced labour requirements, ease of process automation, and more effective pathogen removal. • An additional advantage is the generation of a consistent effluent quality with respect to suspended matter and pathogens. • This treatment usually results in effluent turbidities well below 1 NTU.
  • 10. • The drawbacks of this technology are potentially higher capital costs, the limited life span of membranes requiring replacement, the complexity of the operation, and the potential for irreversible membrane fouling that reduces productivity.
  • 11. Advanced filtration techniques include the following: • Reverse osmosis (RO): In this process, water moves through a membrane with pores that block the passage of molecules larger than water. • RO is the most commonly used advanced filtration method, produces water of especially high purity, and is vital to desalination, water recycling, and wastewater treatment. • Nanofiltration, microfiltration, and ultrafiltration: These are all membrane processes similar to reverse osmosis. All three processes operate on roughly the same principle, though each is best suited for removing contaminant particles of different sizes. For example, microfiltration is best used with fresh water, because the contaminants found in it are of larger size than those found in saltwater, for which reverse osmosis is most often used.
  • 12. Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration • MF and UF membrane processes can be configured using pressurized or submerged membrane modules. • In the pressurized configuration, a pump is used to pressurize the feedwater and circulate it through the membrane. • In a submerged system, membrane elements are immersed in the feedwater tank, and permeate is withdrawn through the membrane by applying a vacuum. • The key operational parameter that determines the efficiency of MF and UF membranes and operating costs is flux, which is the rate of water flow volume per membrane area. • Factors affecting the flux rate include the applied pressure, fouling potential, and reclaimed water characteristics. • Typically, MF and UF processes operate at flux rates ranging from 48 to 190 L/m2 per hour.
  • 13. Cont.… • An ultrafiltration filter has a pore size of around 0.01 microns. A microfiltration filter has a pore size of around 0.1 microns, so when water undergoes microfiltration, many microorganisms are removed, but viruses remain in the water. Ultrafiltration would remove these larger particles and may remove some viruses • However, filtration efficiencies vary with the type of membrane and the physical and chemical characteristics of the wastewater, resulting in a wide range of removal efficiencies for pathogens. • MF and certain UF membranes should not be relied upon for the complete removal of viruses for several reasons. • Nevertheless, it is generally believed that the new filtration systems have significantly improved performance for microbial removal.
  • 15. Cont.….. • Combining MF with chlorination is likely to improve the rate of virus removal. • MF and UF membranes sometimes in combination with coagulation can also physically retain large dissolved organic molecules and colloidal particles. • Effluent organic matter and hydrophobic trace organic chemicals can also adsorb to MF and UF membranes, but this initial adsorption capacity is quickly exhausted.
  • 17. Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis • For reuse projects that require the removal of dissolved solids and trace organic chemicals and where consistent water quality is desired, the use of integrated membrane systems incorporating MF or UF followed by NF or RO can be required. • RO and NF are pressure-driven membrane processes that separate dissolved constituents from a feed stream into a concentrate and permeate stream. • Treating reclaimed water with RO and NF membranes usually results in product water recoveries of 70 to 85 %. • Thus, the use of NF or RO results in a net loss of water resources through the disposal of the brine concentrate. • RO applications in water reuse have been favored in coastal settings where the RO concentrate can be conveniently discharged to the ocean. • Thus, existing inland water reuse installations employing RO membranes are limited in capacity and commonly discharge brine to the sewer or a receiving stream provided that there is enough dilution capacity.
  • 33. Cont.… • Most commonly used RO and NF membranes provide apparent molecular weight cutoffs of less than 150 and 300 Daltons, respectively, and are therefore highly efficient in the removal of organic matter and selective for trace organic chemicals. • Some of the organic constituents that are only partially removed by NF and RO membranes are low-molecular-weight organic acids as well as certain disinfection byproducts. • Recent advances in membrane development have resulted in low-pressure RO membranes and NF membranes that can be operated at significantly lower feed pressure while providing approximately the same product water quality. • However, certain monovalent ions (e.g., Cl– , Na+ , NO3 – ) are only partially rejected by NF, and NF membranes result in product water with higher TDS than RO. • Nowadays, most integrated membrane systems applied in reuse employ RO rather than NF. • However, certain low-pressure NF membranes offer opportunities for wider applications in water reclamation projects because they have lower energy requirements and can achieve selective rejection of salts and organic constituents that results in less concentrated brine streams.
  • 34. Cont.. • For wastewater applications, RO and ultra-low-pressure RO membrane facilities typically operate at feed pressures between 1,000 and 2,100 kPa in order to produce between 13.5 and 20 L/m2 per hour of permeate.
  • 35. Substances and contaminants are nominally removed by pressure- driven membrane processes
  • 38. Video 1: What is reverse osmosis?
  • 39. Video 2: How does RO work?
  • 40. Tasks
  • 41. Cont.… Question. Estimate the quantity and quality of the waste stream, and the total quantity of water that must be processed, from a reverse osmosis facility that is to produce 4000 m3 /d of water to be used for industrial cooling operations. Assume that both the recovery and rejection rates are equal to 90 % and that the concentration of the feed stream is 400 g/m3 .