Pimpisa Jular
                                                                           494 53466 28
AGAINST STATEMENT

       As the consequences of teenage drinking problem are rampant, the Minister of
Public Health is aiming to raise the drinking age in Thailand to 24 years. Nonetheless,
on the behalf of Thai students, the proposal is violating many students’ rights to their
own freewill.

        Firstly, the Minister of Public Health claims that by raising the drinking age to
24 years will help prevent underage drinkers from gaining access to pubs or buying
alcohol as they will look too young. This solution will not only agitate teenagers’
curiosity but it will also lead to following problems such as duplicating fake ID card
or teenagers might even ask people who are of age to buy alcohol for them. Therefore,
what should be done to solve this first issue is to develop more responsibility and
conscience among teenagers rather than prohibiting them.
        Secondly, the proposal claims that the new regulation will ensure students
concentration on their studies rather than social activities. This point raises a question
that the term “social activities” expand or cover up to what extent. This is because,
there are other social activities that they could do as well as going out to pubs or
drinking alcohol, which could also distract them from their studies. The issue should
be addressed by building more self-containment among teenagers and teaching them
about time allocation, so that they can balance their own time between studying and
doing leisure.
        Lastly, the most severe consequence of drinking is drunk driving, which often
cause much consternation such as accidents and deaths. Basically, drunk drivers can
be persons of any age range. Drivers above the age of 24 may be the cause of drunk
driving as well as drivers below the age of 24. To solve this issue, the law should shift
to being more stringent with drunk drivers. There should be alcohol testing stops all
around pubs areas to make sure that drunk drivers are under strict control of the
police.

        As one of the students, I strongly disagree with the proposal, and thus, oppose
to the enforcement of this regulation.

More Related Content

PDF
Schools
DOCX
Marcos
PPTX
10 reasons why you should quit smoking
DOCX
PPSX
Teenagers are unaware of the dangers of smoking
DOCX
Task 3
PPT
Safe Sensible Social
PPT
The influence of alcohol consumption on university students aged 18 to 24
Schools
Marcos
10 reasons why you should quit smoking
Teenagers are unaware of the dangers of smoking
Task 3
Safe Sensible Social
The influence of alcohol consumption on university students aged 18 to 24

What's hot (20)

PPT
Youth Alcohol Action Plan
PPTX
Teen smoking.2
PPTX
The university of lahore smoking
DOC
Alcohol - Olaya
PPTX
Thinking Before Drinking
DOCX
DOCX
Rodrigo
PPTX
What drug testing, where- school
PPTX
PPTX
Shirley Should Tobacco Be Banned Ppt
 
DOCX
Interview prep sheet 2nd story
DOC
Alcohol - David González
PPTX
Smoking In Public
PPT
Up in smoke power point
PPTX
Ethical issue in Cigarette Industry.pptx
PPTX
Coram Life Education - ADEPIS seminar
DOCX
DOCX
Eliana
PDF
ENG ESSAY
PPTX
Problems of the youth
Youth Alcohol Action Plan
Teen smoking.2
The university of lahore smoking
Alcohol - Olaya
Thinking Before Drinking
Rodrigo
What drug testing, where- school
Shirley Should Tobacco Be Banned Ppt
 
Interview prep sheet 2nd story
Alcohol - David González
Smoking In Public
Up in smoke power point
Ethical issue in Cigarette Industry.pptx
Coram Life Education - ADEPIS seminar
Eliana
ENG ESSAY
Problems of the youth
Ad

Viewers also liked (10)

DOC
Claim Letter
DOC
News Reporting
DOC
ECHO's Editorial
DOC
Anydy Warhol
DOC
Media Alert
PPT
Consumer Behavior Course
PPT
Reporting and the News Process
PPTX
Journalism basics pp
PPT
IKEA Marketing Idea
PPT
Principle marketing nescafe slides
Claim Letter
News Reporting
ECHO's Editorial
Anydy Warhol
Media Alert
Consumer Behavior Course
Reporting and the News Process
Journalism basics pp
IKEA Marketing Idea
Principle marketing nescafe slides
Ad

Against Statement

  • 1. Pimpisa Jular 494 53466 28 AGAINST STATEMENT As the consequences of teenage drinking problem are rampant, the Minister of Public Health is aiming to raise the drinking age in Thailand to 24 years. Nonetheless, on the behalf of Thai students, the proposal is violating many students’ rights to their own freewill. Firstly, the Minister of Public Health claims that by raising the drinking age to 24 years will help prevent underage drinkers from gaining access to pubs or buying alcohol as they will look too young. This solution will not only agitate teenagers’ curiosity but it will also lead to following problems such as duplicating fake ID card or teenagers might even ask people who are of age to buy alcohol for them. Therefore, what should be done to solve this first issue is to develop more responsibility and conscience among teenagers rather than prohibiting them. Secondly, the proposal claims that the new regulation will ensure students concentration on their studies rather than social activities. This point raises a question that the term “social activities” expand or cover up to what extent. This is because, there are other social activities that they could do as well as going out to pubs or drinking alcohol, which could also distract them from their studies. The issue should be addressed by building more self-containment among teenagers and teaching them about time allocation, so that they can balance their own time between studying and doing leisure. Lastly, the most severe consequence of drinking is drunk driving, which often cause much consternation such as accidents and deaths. Basically, drunk drivers can be persons of any age range. Drivers above the age of 24 may be the cause of drunk driving as well as drivers below the age of 24. To solve this issue, the law should shift to being more stringent with drunk drivers. There should be alcohol testing stops all around pubs areas to make sure that drunk drivers are under strict control of the police. As one of the students, I strongly disagree with the proposal, and thus, oppose to the enforcement of this regulation.