The document analyzes media coverage of sexual harassment allegations against Herman Cain from his time as head of the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s. It finds that MSNBC's coverage uses charged language like "accused" and "allegedly" frequently when discussing the story. Meanwhile, the AP treats the story as straight news when republishing the allegations. The document also examines the source of the allegations, Politico, finding that it heavily promoted the story but the reporters who broke it had varied political backgrounds. It ultimately concludes any political story will have a charged atmosphere.