SlideShare a Scribd company logo
EARLI — SIG 16 Metacognition, 
2nd Biennial Conference — Friday 21 July 2006 
Excel spreadsheet to support 
veterinary student’s 
metacognition 
Jean-Loup Castaigne 
IFRES — LabSET 
University of Liege, Belgium
Liege, the Vet faculty 
Geographical situation 
Who am I? 
What teaching am I involved with? 
Reproduction of the cow and the mare 
5th year out of 6 — students’ mean age of 24 
390 students — 75% of girls — 10% of 
students with interest in cattle and horses. 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
2
Excel spreadsheet to 
support veterinary 
student’s metacognition 
3 
Outline 
• Theoretical background 
• Presentation of the tool 
• Survey 
• Conclusions
“Regulative” metacognition 
Bernadette Noël (1991) 
Metacognitive judgment 
Metacognitive process: being 
aware 
Metacognitive decision: 
decide to or not to regulate 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
4
Excel spreadsheet to 
support veterinary 
student’s metacognition Outline 
• Theoretical background 
• Presentation of the tool 
• Survey 
• Conclusions
Methodology (1 year) 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
Teaching 
Study 
formative 
test 1 
September 
Teaching Study 
formative 
test 2 
December 
certification 
Study Teaching test 1 (January) formative 
test 2 
February 
Study 
Oral 
exam 
(June) 
Teaching Study certification 
test 2 (March) 
from Edgar P. Jacobs 1956 - The Yellow "M" 
6 
ISBN 2-87097-010-2
Weight of each test 
Formative test #1 
Formative test #2 
Certification test #1 
Formative test #3 
Certification test #2 
Final oral examination 
100% 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 7
Pay-off for MCQ 
“cognitive” score 
Correct Answer (CA): +1 
Wrong Answer (WA): -0,5 
No answer (NoA): -0,25 
Freedom to use, or not to 
confidence marking for MCQ 
self-estimation for open questions 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
8
Hypothesis 
If confidence marking does 
NOT influence the results 
of the test, students will be 
more sincere giving the 
confidence they associate 
with the chosen answer. 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 9
Are the students sincere? 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
10 
Certitu 
de 
0-25% 25-50 
% 
50-70 
% 
70-85 
% 
85-95 
% 
95-100 
Référen % 
ce 
12,5 % 37,5 % 60 % 77,5 % 90 % 98,5 % 
cochez 0 1 2 3 4 5 
RC +13 +16 +17 +18 +19 +20 
RI +4 +3 +2 +0 -6 -20
Survey (n=369) 
In certification tests including confidence 
marking, I choose maximum 60% and less 
if I doubt because for an incorrect answer 
with a confidence of 80% ou 100% penalize 
my score. 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
11 
Confi 
dence 
0 % 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 % 
Thick 0 1 2 3 4 5 
CA +13 +16 +17 +18 +19 +20 
IA +4 +3 +2 +0 -6 -20
5 metacognitive measures 
Help Global view of a# 5 tests 
Individual test with comments 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 12
Computing and drawing 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 13
Spectral distribution 
no answer 
Incorrect answers 
Confidence : from -100 to -0 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
Jans (1999) 
Correct answers 
Confidence : from 0 to +100 Number of answers 
14
Spectral distribution 
Three types of knowledge situation 
misinformed 
uninformed 
informed 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
15 
Hunt (1993)
Spectral distribution 
uninformed 
no answer 
misinformed 
Confidence : from -100 to -0 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
Hunt (1993) Jans (1999) 
informed 
Confidence : from 0 to +100 Number of answers 16
Spectral distribution 
no answer 
misinformed 
Confidence : from -100 to -0 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
Hunt (1993) 
informed 
Confidence : from 0 to +100 Number of answers 
17 
uninformed 
Jans (1999) 
Dangerous 
Konwledge 
Usable 
Knowledge 
unusable knowledge
Four zones 
Unawareness 
Leclercq 2003 
Usable 
knowledge 
answers 
of Number Confidence : from -100 to Confidence -0 : from 0 to +100 Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 18 
Mid 
knowledge 
Dangerous 
knowledge
Drawing of graphs 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
19
Regarding all Realism graph 
MCQ for which 
you choose a 
confidence of 
40% 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
adapted "om 
Chosen confidence Leclercq & Gi$es 1995 
Percentage of CA 
For those MCQ 
you’ve reached a 
score of 63% of 
correct answers 
You’ve succeeded 
more (63%) than you 
estimate (40%): thus 
in the class of 40% 
you underestimate 
your level 
20
Comments: evaluated fields 
Cognitive field 
Metacognitive field 
Objective judgments & analysis 
Subjective judgments & analysis 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
Metacognitive regulation 
21
An experience using degrees of certitude
Excel spreadsheet to 
support veterinary 
student’s metacognition Outline 
• Theoretical background 
• Presentation of the tool 
• Survey 
• Conclusions
Cognition vs. Metacognition 
I’ve progressed in metacognition only 
because I progressed in knowledge in 
reproduction 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
24
Regulation “product” 
Filling the spreadsheet pushed me to 
study more reproduction 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
25
Regulation “process” 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
26 
Because of what I’ve learned filling the 
spreadsheet I’ve change my method of 
working
Because of what I’ve learned filling the 
spreadsheet I’ve changed the way I use 
confidence marking 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
27 
Regulation “process”
Excel spreadsheet to 
support veterinary 
student’s metacognition Outline 
• Theoretical background 
• Presentation of the tool 
• Survey 
• Conclusions
Conclusion 
“Regulative” metacognition 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
29 
Noël (1991) 
Products Processess 
pre per post pre per post 
Judgment ✔ 
Analysis ✔ 
✔ 
Regulation ✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ ✔
Conclusion 
“ I’m not sure that this system helps us to 
understand better success or failure. It is 
very complex and it doesn’t matter 
commenting numbers or graphs, it’s 
always theoretical…” 
“I was really dubious regarding the 
efficiency of this system but my own 
progresses proves me that it was hugely 
profitable.” 
Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 
30
Thank you for 
your attention.

More Related Content

PDF
Exploring the Real World: Medical Librarians' Involvement in Supporting EBM P...
PPTX
Classes inversées… avant l’invention du terme
PPTX
Accompagner mémoires et rapports d'étude
PDF
Aller plus loin avec les QCM grâce aux degrés de certitude
PDF
Teaching Architecture, incl. Studio: Education's Sciences POV
PPTX
La pédagogie du projet par le projet pour soutenir la créativité
PPT
Hollaway Pres
PPT
Presentation1
Exploring the Real World: Medical Librarians' Involvement in Supporting EBM P...
Classes inversées… avant l’invention du terme
Accompagner mémoires et rapports d'étude
Aller plus loin avec les QCM grâce aux degrés de certitude
Teaching Architecture, incl. Studio: Education's Sciences POV
La pédagogie du projet par le projet pour soutenir la créativité
Hollaway Pres
Presentation1

Viewers also liked (20)

PPT
Clvsllc
PPT
Ukk2009 Sitesi
PPT
Presentation1
PPT
Presentation1
PPTX
Skattefar: En myndighed på Twitter (September 2013)
PPT
Developing Countries Pursuing Nuclear Technology
PPT
Horse Slaughter
PDF
Metacognition in ELEKTRA
PPTX
Is it Spring Yet?
PDF
La conception et l’évolution de dispositifs numériques d’apprentissage dans u...
PPT
Pptpodcast2
PPTX
Rehearsal Ppt
PPT
Apocalypse
PPTX
Stress Management Presentation
PDF
Présentation et exercices pour découvrir LaTeX
PDF
De la doxa digital native : définition, déconstruction et impacts sur les pra...
PPTX
Compensation ensaL
PDF
Pédagogie pour adultes
PPTX
Séminaire de rentrée des étudiants de L1
PDF
L'évaluation des enseignements et des formations par les étudiants, un des él...
Clvsllc
Ukk2009 Sitesi
Presentation1
Presentation1
Skattefar: En myndighed på Twitter (September 2013)
Developing Countries Pursuing Nuclear Technology
Horse Slaughter
Metacognition in ELEKTRA
Is it Spring Yet?
La conception et l’évolution de dispositifs numériques d’apprentissage dans u...
Pptpodcast2
Rehearsal Ppt
Apocalypse
Stress Management Presentation
Présentation et exercices pour découvrir LaTeX
De la doxa digital native : définition, déconstruction et impacts sur les pra...
Compensation ensaL
Pédagogie pour adultes
Séminaire de rentrée des étudiants de L1
L'évaluation des enseignements et des formations par les étudiants, un des él...
Ad

Similar to An experience using degrees of certitude (20)

PPTX
How do we make science better?
PPT
Metacogntion seminar
PDF
Chapter 2 - Facilitating Learner-Centered Teaching
PDF
Research Methods in Psychology 10th Edition Shaughnessy Solutions Manual
PPT
’Me’ Learning: A Constructivist Approach to Web Evaluation
PPT
Assessment_basics_ictcm. in educationppt
PPTX
Concept and phases of meta cognition (1)
PPTX
22 January 2018 HEFCE open event “Using data to increase learning gains and t...
DOCX
Psychology Report on Metacognition
PPTX
Lessons learned from 200K students and 2 GB of learning gains data.
PPTX
metacognition2.pptxrequirement for the subject educ8
PDF
Research Methods in Psychology 10th Edition Shaughnessy Solutions Manual
PDF
Research Methods in Psychology 10th Edition Shaughnessy Solutions Manual
PPTX
Teaching Metacognition
PPT
Evaluation of training
PPTX
How do we make science better?
PPTX
Metacognition
PPTX
Setting Question_Dr Jamilah.pptx
DOCX
Bloom's Taxonomy
PDF
Research Methods in Psychology 10th Edition Shaughnessy Solutions Manual
How do we make science better?
Metacogntion seminar
Chapter 2 - Facilitating Learner-Centered Teaching
Research Methods in Psychology 10th Edition Shaughnessy Solutions Manual
’Me’ Learning: A Constructivist Approach to Web Evaluation
Assessment_basics_ictcm. in educationppt
Concept and phases of meta cognition (1)
22 January 2018 HEFCE open event “Using data to increase learning gains and t...
Psychology Report on Metacognition
Lessons learned from 200K students and 2 GB of learning gains data.
metacognition2.pptxrequirement for the subject educ8
Research Methods in Psychology 10th Edition Shaughnessy Solutions Manual
Research Methods in Psychology 10th Edition Shaughnessy Solutions Manual
Teaching Metacognition
Evaluation of training
How do we make science better?
Metacognition
Setting Question_Dr Jamilah.pptx
Bloom's Taxonomy
Research Methods in Psychology 10th Edition Shaughnessy Solutions Manual
Ad

More from Jean-Loup Castaigne (19)

PPTX
Formation des doctorants à l'enseignement
PPTX
Formation des nouveaux Enseignants-Chercheurs, IMT-A 2018
PPTX
Comment améliorer la qualité des apprentissages à l’aide de l’évaluation des ...
PPTX
Enseigner et Apprendre en enseignement supérieur
PPTX
Experiential Learning in Architecture Education
PPTX
Année de césure : un truc de branleur ?
PPTX
Faire participer les étudiants avec les boîtiers de vote
PPTX
Quels outils pour évaluer quels apprentissages ?
PPTX
Evaluer les acquis des étudiants
PPTX
Apprentissage par problème APP — PBL
PPTX
Accompagner mémoires et rapports d'étude en école d'architecture
PPTX
Enseigner et apprendre
PDF
Murène ou Alien ?
PDF
Qui est cette carpe ?
PDF
Quelques indices pour différencier blennies et gobies
PDF
Crabe chinois dans la Meuse Hollandaise
PDF
Plongée et otite
KEY
Apprentissage Raisonnement Clinique
PDF
Métacognition et apprentissage par le jeu
Formation des doctorants à l'enseignement
Formation des nouveaux Enseignants-Chercheurs, IMT-A 2018
Comment améliorer la qualité des apprentissages à l’aide de l’évaluation des ...
Enseigner et Apprendre en enseignement supérieur
Experiential Learning in Architecture Education
Année de césure : un truc de branleur ?
Faire participer les étudiants avec les boîtiers de vote
Quels outils pour évaluer quels apprentissages ?
Evaluer les acquis des étudiants
Apprentissage par problème APP — PBL
Accompagner mémoires et rapports d'étude en école d'architecture
Enseigner et apprendre
Murène ou Alien ?
Qui est cette carpe ?
Quelques indices pour différencier blennies et gobies
Crabe chinois dans la Meuse Hollandaise
Plongée et otite
Apprentissage Raisonnement Clinique
Métacognition et apprentissage par le jeu

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PDF
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
PPTX
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
PPTX
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PDF
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PPTX
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.

An experience using degrees of certitude

  • 1. EARLI — SIG 16 Metacognition, 2nd Biennial Conference — Friday 21 July 2006 Excel spreadsheet to support veterinary student’s metacognition Jean-Loup Castaigne IFRES — LabSET University of Liege, Belgium
  • 2. Liege, the Vet faculty Geographical situation Who am I? What teaching am I involved with? Reproduction of the cow and the mare 5th year out of 6 — students’ mean age of 24 390 students — 75% of girls — 10% of students with interest in cattle and horses. Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 2
  • 3. Excel spreadsheet to support veterinary student’s metacognition 3 Outline • Theoretical background • Presentation of the tool • Survey • Conclusions
  • 4. “Regulative” metacognition Bernadette Noël (1991) Metacognitive judgment Metacognitive process: being aware Metacognitive decision: decide to or not to regulate Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 4
  • 5. Excel spreadsheet to support veterinary student’s metacognition Outline • Theoretical background • Presentation of the tool • Survey • Conclusions
  • 6. Methodology (1 year) Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 Teaching Study formative test 1 September Teaching Study formative test 2 December certification Study Teaching test 1 (January) formative test 2 February Study Oral exam (June) Teaching Study certification test 2 (March) from Edgar P. Jacobs 1956 - The Yellow "M" 6 ISBN 2-87097-010-2
  • 7. Weight of each test Formative test #1 Formative test #2 Certification test #1 Formative test #3 Certification test #2 Final oral examination 100% Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 7
  • 8. Pay-off for MCQ “cognitive” score Correct Answer (CA): +1 Wrong Answer (WA): -0,5 No answer (NoA): -0,25 Freedom to use, or not to confidence marking for MCQ self-estimation for open questions Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 8
  • 9. Hypothesis If confidence marking does NOT influence the results of the test, students will be more sincere giving the confidence they associate with the chosen answer. Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 9
  • 10. Are the students sincere? Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 10 Certitu de 0-25% 25-50 % 50-70 % 70-85 % 85-95 % 95-100 Référen % ce 12,5 % 37,5 % 60 % 77,5 % 90 % 98,5 % cochez 0 1 2 3 4 5 RC +13 +16 +17 +18 +19 +20 RI +4 +3 +2 +0 -6 -20
  • 11. Survey (n=369) In certification tests including confidence marking, I choose maximum 60% and less if I doubt because for an incorrect answer with a confidence of 80% ou 100% penalize my score. Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 11 Confi dence 0 % 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 % Thick 0 1 2 3 4 5 CA +13 +16 +17 +18 +19 +20 IA +4 +3 +2 +0 -6 -20
  • 12. 5 metacognitive measures Help Global view of a# 5 tests Individual test with comments Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 12
  • 13. Computing and drawing Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 13
  • 14. Spectral distribution no answer Incorrect answers Confidence : from -100 to -0 Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 Jans (1999) Correct answers Confidence : from 0 to +100 Number of answers 14
  • 15. Spectral distribution Three types of knowledge situation misinformed uninformed informed Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 15 Hunt (1993)
  • 16. Spectral distribution uninformed no answer misinformed Confidence : from -100 to -0 Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 Hunt (1993) Jans (1999) informed Confidence : from 0 to +100 Number of answers 16
  • 17. Spectral distribution no answer misinformed Confidence : from -100 to -0 Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 Hunt (1993) informed Confidence : from 0 to +100 Number of answers 17 uninformed Jans (1999) Dangerous Konwledge Usable Knowledge unusable knowledge
  • 18. Four zones Unawareness Leclercq 2003 Usable knowledge answers of Number Confidence : from -100 to Confidence -0 : from 0 to +100 Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 18 Mid knowledge Dangerous knowledge
  • 19. Drawing of graphs Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 19
  • 20. Regarding all Realism graph MCQ for which you choose a confidence of 40% Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 adapted "om Chosen confidence Leclercq & Gi$es 1995 Percentage of CA For those MCQ you’ve reached a score of 63% of correct answers You’ve succeeded more (63%) than you estimate (40%): thus in the class of 40% you underestimate your level 20
  • 21. Comments: evaluated fields Cognitive field Metacognitive field Objective judgments & analysis Subjective judgments & analysis Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 Metacognitive regulation 21
  • 23. Excel spreadsheet to support veterinary student’s metacognition Outline • Theoretical background • Presentation of the tool • Survey • Conclusions
  • 24. Cognition vs. Metacognition I’ve progressed in metacognition only because I progressed in knowledge in reproduction Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 24
  • 25. Regulation “product” Filling the spreadsheet pushed me to study more reproduction Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 25
  • 26. Regulation “process” Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 26 Because of what I’ve learned filling the spreadsheet I’ve change my method of working
  • 27. Because of what I’ve learned filling the spreadsheet I’ve changed the way I use confidence marking Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 27 Regulation “process”
  • 28. Excel spreadsheet to support veterinary student’s metacognition Outline • Theoretical background • Presentation of the tool • Survey • Conclusions
  • 29. Conclusion “Regulative” metacognition Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 29 Noël (1991) Products Processess pre per post pre per post Judgment ✔ Analysis ✔ ✔ Regulation ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
  • 30. Conclusion “ I’m not sure that this system helps us to understand better success or failure. It is very complex and it doesn’t matter commenting numbers or graphs, it’s always theoretical…” “I was really dubious regarding the efficiency of this system but my own progresses proves me that it was hugely profitable.” Jean-Loup Castaigne, EARLI-SIG Metacognition, Cambridge 2006 30
  • 31. Thank you for your attention.

Editor's Notes

  • #3: The vet faculty is part of Liege university which laid south off Liege town, on a hill, in the middle of the woods. I have been graduated as a vet surgeon in 1993. In 1999 I’ve been offered a position in reproduction of large animals. The teaching happens in 5th out of 6 year of formation. 75 percent of student are girls. Only 10% pay some interest to cattle and horses.
  • #4: The vet faculty is part of Liege university which laid south off Liege town, on a hill, in the middle of the woods. I have been graduated as a vet surgeon in 1993. In 1999 I’ve been offered a position in reproduction of large animals. The teaching happens in 5th out of 6 year of formation. 75 percent of student are girls. Only 10% pay some interest to cattle and horses.
  • #5: The vet faculty is part of Liege university which laid south off Liege town, on a hill, in the middle of the woods. I have been graduated as a vet surgeon in 1993. In 1999 I’ve been offered a position in reproduction of large animals. The teaching happens in 5th out of 6 year of formation. 75 percent of student are girls. Only 10% pay some interest to cattle and horses.
  • #6: The vet faculty is part of Liege university which laid south off Liege town, on a hill, in the middle of the woods. I have been graduated as a vet surgeon in 1993. In 1999 I’ve been offered a position in reproduction of large animals. The teaching happens in 5th out of 6 year of formation. 75 percent of student are girls. Only 10% pay some interest to cattle and horses.
  • #7: My presentation will be divided in 4 parts, the main one being the presentation of the tool.
  • #8: My presentation will be divided in 4 parts, the main one being the presentation of the tool.
  • #9: My presentation will be divided in 4 parts, the main one being the presentation of the tool.
  • #10: My presentation will be divided in 4 parts, the main one being the presentation of the tool.
  • #11: Nowl 1991 workflow: to do all three in a row
  • #12: Nowl 1991 workflow: to do all three in a row
  • #13: Nowl 1991 workflow: to do all three in a row
  • #14: Nowl 1991 workflow: to do all three in a row
  • #15: Nowl 1991 workflow: to do all three in a row
  • #31: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #32: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #33: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #34: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #35: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #36: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #37: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #38: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #39: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #40: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #41: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #42: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #43: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #44: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #45: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #46: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #47: Confidence marking consists in asking to a student to add a Degree of Certainty (DC) to each answer to a test
  • #49: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #50: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #51: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #52: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #53: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #54: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #55: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #56: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #57: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #58: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #59: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #60: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #61: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #62: First course: test on the prerequisite, mainly physiology and anatomy. Formative test meaning that the score will not influence the final score of the student M stands for metacognition analysis and regulation. Judgment occurs during the test. Certification test means that the test -if taken- will influence the final score.
  • #63: Students are free to take the certification tests or not to. If they do the score of the test will influence the final score by a weight of 15% for C1 and 35% for C2. The remaining percentage to reach 100% is devoted to the oral examination. Should a student succeed both certification test then he/she is allowed either to keep that score or to take the oral exam to make it better... or not the weight of the oral remaining 50% at least.
  • #64: Students are free to take the certification tests or not to. If they do the score of the test will influence the final score by a weight of 15% for C1 and 35% for C2. The remaining percentage to reach 100% is devoted to the oral examination. Should a student succeed both certification test then he/she is allowed either to keep that score or to take the oral exam to make it better... or not the weight of the oral remaining 50% at least.
  • #65: Students are free to take the certification tests or not to. If they do the score of the test will influence the final score by a weight of 15% for C1 and 35% for C2. The remaining percentage to reach 100% is devoted to the oral examination. Should a student succeed both certification test then he/she is allowed either to keep that score or to take the oral exam to make it better... or not the weight of the oral remaining 50% at least.
  • #66: Students are free to take the certification tests or not to. If they do the score of the test will influence the final score by a weight of 15% for C1 and 35% for C2. The remaining percentage to reach 100% is devoted to the oral examination. Should a student succeed both certification test then he/she is allowed either to keep that score or to take the oral exam to make it better... or not the weight of the oral remaining 50% at least.
  • #67: Students are free to take the certification tests or not to. If they do the score of the test will influence the final score by a weight of 15% for C1 and 35% for C2. The remaining percentage to reach 100% is devoted to the oral examination. Should a student succeed both certification test then he/she is allowed either to keep that score or to take the oral exam to make it better... or not the weight of the oral remaining 50% at least.
  • #68: Students are free to take the certification tests or not to. If they do the score of the test will influence the final score by a weight of 15% for C1 and 35% for C2. The remaining percentage to reach 100% is devoted to the oral examination. Should a student succeed both certification test then he/she is allowed either to keep that score or to take the oral exam to make it better... or not the weight of the oral remaining 50% at least.
  • #69: Not to answer when you don’t know in every day situation is recommended. Not to answer during an exam after teaching, notes, time for questions, training and so on has been given is a completely different situation
  • #70: Not to answer when you don’t know in every day situation is recommended. Not to answer during an exam after teaching, notes, time for questions, training and so on has been given is a completely different situation
  • #71: our hypothesis is It is based on 3 years of data collection using confidence marking and on a survey...
  • #73: and a survey in which we asked to our student the following question. We had 369 answers in which 42% of the student admit that they use the described strategy (maybe not all the time and maybe other strategies)
  • #74: and a survey in which we asked to our student the following question. We had 369 answers in which 42% of the student admit that they use the described strategy (maybe not all the time and maybe other strategies)
  • #75: and a survey in which we asked to our student the following question. We had 369 answers in which 42% of the student admit that they use the described strategy (maybe not all the time and maybe other strategies)
  • #76: This is the empty of results spreadsheet the student receives. This sheet shows the global view of all tests. Help is provided with 1. a small step by step user guide, 2. cells that must be filled contain what is expected in terms of contents, 3. values that are computed are explained for both how they are computed and how to analyze then, and 4. a specific sheet contains all information in text. Each of the 5 test has also its own sheet for the student to type their comments.
  • #77: This is the empty of results spreadsheet the student receives. This sheet shows the global view of all tests. Help is provided with 1. a small step by step user guide, 2. cells that must be filled contain what is expected in terms of contents, 3. values that are computed are explained for both how they are computed and how to analyze then, and 4. a specific sheet contains all information in text. Each of the 5 test has also its own sheet for the student to type their comments.
  • #78: This is the empty of results spreadsheet the student receives. This sheet shows the global view of all tests. Help is provided with 1. a small step by step user guide, 2. cells that must be filled contain what is expected in terms of contents, 3. values that are computed are explained for both how they are computed and how to analyze then, and 4. a specific sheet contains all information in text. Each of the 5 test has also its own sheet for the student to type their comments.
  • #79: This is the empty of results spreadsheet the student receives. This sheet shows the global view of all tests. Help is provided with 1. a small step by step user guide, 2. cells that must be filled contain what is expected in terms of contents, 3. values that are computed are explained for both how they are computed and how to analyze then, and 4. a specific sheet contains all information in text. Each of the 5 test has also its own sheet for the student to type their comments.
  • #80: This is the empty of results spreadsheet the student receives. This sheet shows the global view of all tests. Help is provided with 1. a small step by step user guide, 2. cells that must be filled contain what is expected in terms of contents, 3. values that are computed are explained for both how they are computed and how to analyze then, and 4. a specific sheet contains all information in text. Each of the 5 test has also its own sheet for the student to type their comments.
  • #81: This is the empty of results spreadsheet the student receives. This sheet shows the global view of all tests. Help is provided with 1. a small step by step user guide, 2. cells that must be filled contain what is expected in terms of contents, 3. values that are computed are explained for both how they are computed and how to analyze then, and 4. a specific sheet contains all information in text. Each of the 5 test has also its own sheet for the student to type their comments.
  • #82: This is the empty of results spreadsheet the student receives. This sheet shows the global view of all tests. Help is provided with 1. a small step by step user guide, 2. cells that must be filled contain what is expected in terms of contents, 3. values that are computed are explained for both how they are computed and how to analyze then, and 4. a specific sheet contains all information in text. Each of the 5 test has also its own sheet for the student to type their comments.
  • #83: This is the empty of results spreadsheet the student receives. This sheet shows the global view of all tests. Help is provided with 1. a small step by step user guide, 2. cells that must be filled contain what is expected in terms of contents, 3. values that are computed are explained for both how they are computed and how to analyze then, and 4. a specific sheet contains all information in text. Each of the 5 test has also its own sheet for the student to type their comments.
  • #84: This is the empty of results spreadsheet the student receives. This sheet shows the global view of all tests. Help is provided with 1. a small step by step user guide, 2. cells that must be filled contain what is expected in terms of contents, 3. values that are computed are explained for both how they are computed and how to analyze then, and 4. a specific sheet contains all information in text. Each of the 5 test has also its own sheet for the student to type their comments.
  • #85: This is the empty of results spreadsheet the student receives. This sheet shows the global view of all tests. Help is provided with 1. a small step by step user guide, 2. cells that must be filled contain what is expected in terms of contents, 3. values that are computed are explained for both how they are computed and how to analyze then, and 4. a specific sheet contains all information in text. Each of the 5 test has also its own sheet for the student to type their comments.
  • #86: The student pasts the results into the spredsheet that compute some cognitive and metacognitive performance indicators and draws 2 graphs the first one being...
  • #87: The student pasts the results into the spredsheet that compute some cognitive and metacognitive performance indicators and draws 2 graphs the first one being...
  • #88: The student pasts the results into the spredsheet that compute some cognitive and metacognitive performance indicators and draws 2 graphs the first one being...
  • #89: The student pasts the results into the spredsheet that compute some cognitive and metacognitive performance indicators and draws 2 graphs the first one being...
  • #90: The spectral distribution of answers. On the why axis numbers of answers are plotted. On the EX axis are plotted from left to right the incorrect answers with their associated confidence from 100% (written -100) down to zero. Then there is a bar for the number of question without answers. Finally the correct answers are plotted with their associated confidence from 0% up to 100%. How should the students interpret this graph? Jans has based her first idea based on a paper from...
  • #91: The spectral distribution of answers. On the why axis numbers of answers are plotted. On the EX axis are plotted from left to right the incorrect answers with their associated confidence from 100% (written -100) down to zero. Then there is a bar for the number of question without answers. Finally the correct answers are plotted with their associated confidence from 0% up to 100%. How should the students interpret this graph? Jans has based her first idea based on a paper from...
  • #92: The spectral distribution of answers. On the why axis numbers of answers are plotted. On the EX axis are plotted from left to right the incorrect answers with their associated confidence from 100% (written -100) down to zero. Then there is a bar for the number of question without answers. Finally the correct answers are plotted with their associated confidence from 0% up to 100%. How should the students interpret this graph? Jans has based her first idea based on a paper from...
  • #93: The spectral distribution of answers. On the why axis numbers of answers are plotted. On the EX axis are plotted from left to right the incorrect answers with their associated confidence from 100% (written -100) down to zero. Then there is a bar for the number of question without answers. Finally the correct answers are plotted with their associated confidence from 0% up to 100%. How should the students interpret this graph? Jans has based her first idea based on a paper from...
  • #94: The spectral distribution of answers. On the why axis numbers of answers are plotted. On the EX axis are plotted from left to right the incorrect answers with their associated confidence from 100% (written -100) down to zero. Then there is a bar for the number of question without answers. Finally the correct answers are plotted with their associated confidence from 0% up to 100%. How should the students interpret this graph? Jans has based her first idea based on a paper from...
  • #95: The spectral distribution of answers. On the why axis numbers of answers are plotted. On the EX axis are plotted from left to right the incorrect answers with their associated confidence from 100% (written -100) down to zero. Then there is a bar for the number of question without answers. Finally the correct answers are plotted with their associated confidence from 0% up to 100%. How should the students interpret this graph? Jans has based her first idea based on a paper from...
  • #96: The spectral distribution of answers. On the why axis numbers of answers are plotted. On the EX axis are plotted from left to right the incorrect answers with their associated confidence from 100% (written -100) down to zero. Then there is a bar for the number of question without answers. Finally the correct answers are plotted with their associated confidence from 0% up to 100%. How should the students interpret this graph? Jans has based her first idea based on a paper from...
  • #97: The spectral distribution of answers. On the why axis numbers of answers are plotted. On the EX axis are plotted from left to right the incorrect answers with their associated confidence from 100% (written -100) down to zero. Then there is a bar for the number of question without answers. Finally the correct answers are plotted with their associated confidence from 0% up to 100%. How should the students interpret this graph? Jans has based her first idea based on a paper from...
  • #98: Darwin Hunt (1993) suggested to distinguish between three types of knowledge situations in which a person can be in relation to a piece of content : “misinformed, uninformed, informed”.
  • #99: Darwin Hunt (1993) suggested to distinguish between three types of knowledge situations in which a person can be in relation to a piece of content : “misinformed, uninformed, informed”.
  • #100: Darwin Hunt (1993) suggested to distinguish between three types of knowledge situations in which a person can be in relation to a piece of content : “misinformed, uninformed, informed”.
  • #101: Darwin Hunt (1993) suggested to distinguish between three types of knowledge situations in which a person can be in relation to a piece of content : “misinformed, uninformed, informed”.
  • #102: Based on Hunt (1993) suggestion Jans adapted the spectral distribution She also changed the namer of the 3 types of knowledge to allow students to understand in an easier way into...
  • #103: Based on Hunt (1993) suggestion Jans adapted the spectral distribution She also changed the namer of the 3 types of knowledge to allow students to understand in an easier way into...
  • #104: Based on Hunt (1993) suggestion Jans adapted the spectral distribution She also changed the namer of the 3 types of knowledge to allow students to understand in an easier way into...
  • #105: Based on Hunt (1993) suggestion Jans adapted the spectral distribution She also changed the namer of the 3 types of knowledge to allow students to understand in an easier way into...
  • #106: Based on Hunt (1993) suggestion Jans adapted the spectral distribution She also changed the namer of the 3 types of knowledge to allow students to understand in an easier way into...
  • #107: Based on Hunt (1993) suggestion Jans adapted the spectral distribution She also changed the namer of the 3 types of knowledge to allow students to understand in an easier way into...
  • #108: 3 types. This was ok but we thaught that the zone from -50 to +50 was really wide and so we used what Leclercq...
  • #109: 3 types. This was ok but we thaught that the zone from -50 to +50 was really wide and so we used what Leclercq...
  • #110: 3 types. This was ok but we thaught that the zone from -50 to +50 was really wide and so we used what Leclercq...
  • #111: define, keeping the two extreme zone but adding unawarness where knowledge progress are needed and mid-knowledge where the answers are right but progress in metacognitive judgment are needed.
  • #112: define, keeping the two extreme zone but adding unawarness where knowledge progress are needed and mid-knowledge where the answers are right but progress in metacognitive judgment are needed.
  • #113: define, keeping the two extreme zone but adding unawarness where knowledge progress are needed and mid-knowledge where the answers are right but progress in metacognitive judgment are needed.
  • #114: define, keeping the two extreme zone but adding unawarness where knowledge progress are needed and mid-knowledge where the answers are right but progress in metacognitive judgment are needed.
  • #115: define, keeping the two extreme zone but adding unawarness where knowledge progress are needed and mid-knowledge where the answers are right but progress in metacognitive judgment are needed.
  • #116: define, keeping the two extreme zone but adding unawarness where knowledge progress are needed and mid-knowledge where the answers are right but progress in metacognitive judgment are needed.
  • #117: define, keeping the two extreme zone but adding unawarness where knowledge progress are needed and mid-knowledge where the answers are right but progress in metacognitive judgment are needed.
  • #118: define, keeping the two extreme zone but adding unawarness where knowledge progress are needed and mid-knowledge where the answers are right but progress in metacognitive judgment are needed.
  • #119: define, keeping the two extreme zone but adding unawarness where knowledge progress are needed and mid-knowledge where the answers are right but progress in metacognitive judgment are needed.
  • #120: We also asked our student to comment a second graph
  • #121: the distance between the ideal realism line and the reached score in the 40% class
  • #122: the distance between the ideal realism line and the reached score in the 40% class
  • #123: the distance between the ideal realism line and the reached score in the 40% class