Analysis of forced draft cooling tower performance using ansys fluent software

IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Apr-2015, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 217
ANALYSIS OF FORCED DRAFT COOLING TOWER
PERFORMANCE USING ANSYS FLUENT SOFTWARE
S. Parimala Murugaveni1
, P. Mohamed Shameer2
1
Asisstant Professor (Senior Grade), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Government College of Technology-
Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India
2
PG student (Thermal Engineering), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Government College of Technology-
Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India
Abstract
In this project the cooling tower performance has been analyzed by varying air inlet parameters with different air inlet angles
and by attaching a nozzle in air inlet. The cooling tower analyzed here is used specifically for small scale industries, which is
forced draft counter-flow cooling tower with single module capacities from 10 to 100 cooling tons. In this project 50 tons
cooling capacity model has been taken as reference model. The analysis has been done using computational fluid dynamics
(CFD) ANSYS 14.5 software. The cooling tower models have been modeled using SOLIDWORKS 2013 software and they have
been meshed using ICEM CFD 14.5 software. The meshed models have been analyzed using FLUENT software. The air inlet
angles varied in horizontal direction, vertical direction and by combining both horizontal and vertical inclination. A convergent
nozzle has been modeled and assembled to the inlet pipe. The temperature contours of the cooling tower models have been
taken from the analysis. Based on the outlet cold water temperature, the improved effectiveness of the cooling tower model has
been obtained.
Keywords: Forced draft cooling tower, Air inlet parameter, Convergent nozzle, Cooling ton capacity, Counter flow
cooling tower, Ansys 14.5, Solidworks 2013, ICEM CFD 14.5, Effectiveness of cooling tower.
-------------------------------------------------------------------***------------------------------------------------------------------
1. INTRODUCTION
A cooling tower is a type of heat exchanger used to reduce
the temperature of a water stream by extracting heat from
water and emitting it to the atmosphere. Cooling towers use
the evaporation of water to remove process heat and cool the
working fluid to near the wet-bulb air temperature. Cooling
towers are able to lower the water temperatures more than
devices that use only air to reject heat, like the radiator in a
car, and are therefore more cost-effective and energy
efficient. They are generally used in HVAC application.
There are many types of cooling tower available. The forced
draft cross flow and counter flow cooling tower are the most
common ones used in HVAC application.
Forced draft cooling tower is a type of mechanical draft
tower which has a blower type fan at the air intake. With the
fan on the air intake, the fan is more susceptible to
complications due to freezing conditions. The benefit of the
forced draft design is its ability to work with high static
pressure. Such setups can be installed in more-confined
spaces and even in some indoor situations. This fan
geometry is also known as blow-through. The fan forces air
into the tower, creating high entering and low exiting air
velocities. The low exiting velocity is much more susceptible
to recirculation.
Priyanka G, M. R. Nagraj [1] in their research they carried
out with a view to predicting the performance of a shell and
finned tube heat exchanger in the light of waste heat
recovery application. The performance of the heat exchanger
has been evaluated by using the CFD package ANSYS13.0.
They made an attempt to predict the performance of the heat
exchanger by considering different heat transfer fluid and
the result so obtained have been compared. The analysis is
carried out and pressure drop and temperature rise along the
tube surfaces has been investigated. They found that energy
extraction rate is quite significant, that means the
effectiveness of exchanger is higher by increasing the
contact surface area of hot and cold fluid by using the finned
tube heat exchanger.
Mohd Amir, Fithry, Yusoff, MohdZamri [2] in their paper
explored the area in the cross-flow cooling tower where the
focus on where the porous media or the fill / packing are
located and the area in the vicinity for a single phase flow.
The behavior of the air intake flow into the cooling tower
from the side part through the fill was observed and how it
affects the distribution of the air flow inside the fill will be
analyzed. The solution of the related governing equation for
the basic flow and for flow involving porous media was
presented. It was revealed that the porosity introduced a high
pressure drop inside the cooling tower. The pressure inside
the cooling tower generally is lower that before the porous

_______________________________________________________________________________________
media was introduced. The results also revealed that if the
heat transfer inside the porous media is to be improved,
higher dynamic pressure inside the cooling tower is required
which would result in higher fan power output.
Ramzi R. Ibraheem , Sherzad N. Muhammed [3] in their
paper studied the performance of forced draft cooling tower
used in central cooling system is studied as experimental
work and carried out at residential area in the city of Erbil.
Their work includes the estimation of the number of transfer
units for the cooling tower of interest and the effect of
outside conditions such as air temperature and the inlet
water temperature of the cooling tower. The experimental
results show the number of transfer unit is increasing by
increasing the water to air flow ratio and decreases the
approach. The properties of air (temperature, vapor pressure,
enthalpy and humidity) are increased by increasing the water
to air flow ratio and there was no affect of approach. They
estimated that the reduction in the temperature of hot water
takes place by 70% of evaporation and 30% of heat taken out
by the air flowing in counter direction. The effectiveness of
water and air is increased by increasing the water to air flow
ratio. Increasing the range leads to an increase of many
variables and parameters such as number of transfer unit,
water and air properties, and heat load through the tower.
Dr. Jalal M. Jalil, Dr.Talib K.Murtadha, Dr. Qasim S.
Mehdi [4] conducted numerical and experimental studies for
open type forced draft water cooling tower. The numerical
part includes a three dimensional computational solution of
air and water simultaneous equations which represents the
fluid flow, heat transfer and mass transfer. They estimated
that high air flow rate gives low approach that leads to
increase in effectiveness of cooling tower and also the cold
water temperature increases with increment in the air wet
bulb temperature. Experimentally, mechanical forced draft
counter-flow cooling tower was used to validate the
numerical results. The agreement seems acceptable between
the numerical and experimental results.
Dr. D. Al. D.H. Alwan Dr. I. W. Maid A. H. Soheel [5] in
their article, presents an experimental and numerical
investigation of the performance of a forced draft counter
flow cooling tower with two kinds of wire mesh packing.
The packing used in this study is wire mesh with small
square holes (WMSSHSP) and expanded wire mesh with
diamond holes (EWMDHSP) configurations. In the
numerical investigation, the two dimensional CFD model
with finite volume scheme has utilized the standard
turbulence model to computes the air properties, while one-
dimensional model is used to get the water properties. From
the results it is concluded that the (EWMDHSP) enhance the
performance of the cooling tower. That is due to the pressure
drop in the (WMSSHSP) is higher than that for the
(EWMDHSP) because air resistance of the former pack is
higher than the latter pack. The agreement seems to be
acceptable between the numerical and the experimental
results.
Nader Pourmahmoud, Amir Hassan Zadeh, Omid Moutaby,
And Abdolreza Bramo [6] performed research on the energy
separation and flow field behavior of a vortex tube by
utilizing both straight and helical nozzles. They mentioned
that higher swirl velocity is obtained at 450
in divergent
nozzle and at 300
in convergent nozzle. Higher swirl velocity
due to appropriately nozzle shapes can effectively influence
the exit gold gas temperature. Three kinds of nozzles set
include of 3 and 6 straight and 3 helical nozzles have been
investigated and their principal effects as cold temperature
difference was compared by using CFD software.
The refrigeration cycle requires that the heat absorbed from
a refrigerated space be rejected and this is done through the
condenser where the water from the cooling tower
exchanges heat so that it can be discharged by the cooling
tower. It is essential that the performance of the cooling
tower be improved so the refrigerant cycle can take place at
its optimum and hence it increases the effectiveness of the
cooling tower. So this project aimed at analyzing whether
the change in air inlet parameter enhances the effectiveness
or not.
2. WORKING PRINCIPLE
All the cooling towers are working on the principle of water
evaporation. On evaporation of water, both heat and mass
transfer takes place, and water gets cooled. Rate of
evaporation is increased by increasing air velocity. In case of
cooling tower we call this an air draft. This air draft is
created by mechanical system of power driven fan at the
bottom of the cooling tower by using a blower. Hot water is
sprayed into the tower by using specially designed spray
nozzles. Evaporation is a natural phenomenon. Water will
evaporate till air in contact with it gets saturated with
moisture.
Evaporation cannot be more than the saturation point of air.
Thus total evaporation will depend upon the moisture
holding capacity of air, which depends on humidity. When
hot water is sprayed from top of the cooling tower through
our nozzles and air is made to contact from the area
surrounding each nozzle. Air and water travel in co current
direction down to the basin. During this travel, air cools
down the water to desired temperature, and escape through
louvers at the top exit.
3. REFERENCE COOLING TOWER MODEL
Pioneer cooling towers are a forced draft counter-flow
cooling tower with single module capacities from 10 to 100
cooling tons. These towers are a unique design that Delta
Cooling Towers [7] has been manufacturing since 1971 and
have been very well received in both commercial and
industrial applications.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Fig - 1: Reference Model – Pioneer Cooling Tower
The towers are corrosion-proof, which is an important
distinction of Delta towers. Cooling towers are outdoor
equipment, either on roofs or sides of buildings, and are
subjected to weather extremes continuously.
In this project the design considerations are taken for 50
cooling ton capacity.
Fig - 2: Cooling Tower Design Specification
4. MODIFICATIONS IN COOLING TOWER
PARAMETERS
Cooling tower works on the Principle of water evaporation.
Based on rate of evaporation, the hot water could be cooled
more effectively. The rate of evaporation of hot water by,
 Increasing time of contact of air with hot water.
 Increasing air velocity.
 Increasing area of contact of air and hot water.
Table 1: Modifications in Cooling Tower Parameters
Objectives Methodologies
Increasing contact
time of air with hot
water
Changing the air inlet
angle
Increasing air
velocity
Implementing
convergent type nozzle
Increasing area of
contact of air and
hot water
Nozzle implementation
enhances swirl motion
of air
4.1 Air Inlet Pipe Angles
 0o
degree
 30o
degree about horizontal axis
 30o
degree about vertical axis
 30o
degree about both horizontal and vertical axis
5. SOLIDWORKS MODELING
Based on the obtained specification from the reference
cooling tower model, the cooling tower has been modeled
using Solidworks 2013 Modeling Software.
In this project the performance of this cooling tower has
been analyzed by changing the air inlet parameters, by
varying air inlet angles as 0o
, 30o
horizontally, 30o
vertically, 30o
both horizontally and vertically. These varied
air inlet angle models have been designed without changing
any other parameters of reference model. Then these 4
models have been again modeled by assembling convergent
nozzle at the air inlet. Totally 8 cooling tower models have
been modeled and analyzed.
Fig - 3: Isometric View of Cooling Tower Model

_______________________________________________________________________________________
5.1 Varied Air Inlet Angles without Nozzle
Fig - 4: Air Inlet Pipe at 0o
Cooling Tower Model
Inclined Horizontally-Cooling
Tower Model
Inclined Vertically-Cooling
Tower Model
Inclined Horizontally and
Vertically-Cooling Tower Model
5.2 Convergent Nozzle Modeling
The convergent type nozzle has been designed and
implemented at the air inlet pipe inside the cooling tower
shell in order to increase the air velocity and enhancing
swirl motion of air inside the shell, so that the air and water
contact will be comparatively increased that enhance the rate
of evaporation of hot water. For convergent nozzle, the swirl
motion is high at 30o
convergence angle. Based on this
specification the nozzle is designed and modeled.
Fig - 8: Convergent Nozzle Model
5.3 Nozzle Assembled Cooling Tower Models
with Nozzle-Cooling Tower
Model
Fig - 10: Air Inlet Pipe 30o
Inclined Horizontally With
Nozzle-Cooling Tower Model

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Inclined Vertically with Nozzle-
Cooling Tower Model
Inclined Vertically and
Horizontally With Nozzle-Cooling Tower Model
6. CFD PREPROCESSING
The cooling tower models have been imported as the
geometries into IGES (Initial Graphics Exchange
Specification) format. Then the models have been meshed
using ICEM CFD software.
For improved element quality, the Tetra mesher
incorporates a powerful smoothing algorithm, as well as
tools for local adaptive mesh refinement and coarsening.
Fig - 13: Meshed Model of Cooling Tower with 00
Air Inlet
Pipe
All the 8 cooling tower models are meshed and its
geometrics are repaired and then imported to FLUENT
software and boundary conditions are applied and the
solution has been initialized. Figure 13 shows the meshed
model of cooling tower with 0o
air inlet pipe.
6.1 Mesh Details
Total no of elements = 188943
Total no of nodes = 31060
Surface Mesh
No of shells = 9100
Volume Mesh
No of cells = 171887
6.2 Boundary Conditions Applied
 Air inlet diameter, DA = 0.18 m
 Water inlet diameter, DW = 1.66 m
 Mass flow rate of water, mW = 0.055 kg/s
 Mass flow rate of air, mA = 0.0404 kg/s
 Water inlet temperature, T1 = 329 K
 Air inlet WB temperature, TWB = 300 K
7. ANALYZED COOLING TOWER MODELS
The imported models are solved by applying boundary
conditions, the solution is initialized and the temperature
contours have been obtained after the solution convergence
criteria get reached up to its minimum value. The analyzed
cooling tower models are displayed below,

_______________________________________________________________________________________
7.1 Air Inlet Pipe at 0o
without Nozzle
Fig - 14: Temperature Contours for Cooling Tower - Air Inlet Pipe at 0o
Air Inlet Temperature 300 K
Water Inlet Temperature 329 K
Water Outlet Temperature 304 K
Inclined Horizontally without Nozzle

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Inclined Horizontally
Air inlet temperature 300 k
Water inlet temperature 329 k
Water outlet temperature 312 k
7.3 Air Inlet Pipe 30o
Inclined Vertically without Nozzle

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Inclined Horizontally
Inclined about Vertically & Horizontally without Nozzle
Inclined Vertically and Horizontally

_______________________________________________________________________________________
with Nozzle
with Nozzle
Air Inlet temperature 300 K
Inclined Horizontally with Nozzle

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Inclined Vertically with Nozzle

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Inclined about Vertically & Horizontally with Nozzle
Inclined Vertically and Horizontally with Nozzle
8. COOLING TOWER PERFORMANCE
ANALYSIS CALCULATION
Formulae:
I. Range
CT Range (K) = T1 – T2
II. Approach
CT Approach (K) = T2 – TWB
III. Effectiveness
CT Effectiveness (%) = [Range / (Range + Approach)] x 100
IV. Evaporation loss
Evaporation loss (E.L) (m3
/hr) = 0.00085 x 1.8 x QW x (T1 –
T2)
V. Percentage evaporation loss
Percentage evaporation loss (%) = (E.L / QW) x 100
Where,
T1 - Hot water inlet temp (K)
T2 - Cold water outlet temp (K)
TWB - Air Wet bulb temp (K)
QW - Water Circulation rate (m3
/hr)

_______________________________________________________________________________________
Case 1: Air inlet pipe at 0o
T1 = 329 K, T2 = 304 K, TWB = 300 K, QW = 0.198 m3
/hr
i. CT Range (°C) = T1 – T2 = 329 – 304 = 25 K
ii. CT Approach (°C) = T2 – TWB = 304 – 300 = 4 K
iii. CT Effectiveness (%) = [Range / (Range +
Approach)] x 100
= [25 / (25+4)] x 100 = 86.21%
iv. Evaporation loss (E.L) = 0.00085 x 1.8 x QW x (T1 – T2)
= 0.00085 x 1.8 x 0.198 x (329 – 304) = 7.5735x10-3
m3
/hr
v. Percentage evaporation loss (%) = (E.L / QW) x 100
= (7.5735x10-3
/0.198)x100 = 3.825 %
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
By using above formulae, the performance parameters of all
8 cooling tower models have been found out and tabulated
and graphed as follows,
9.1 Calculation Tabulation
Table 2: Calculated Performance Parameters for all 8
Cooling Tower Models
Models Effectiveness
Evaporation
loss
Percentage
evaporatio
n loss
Units % m3
/hr %
I 86.21 7.5735x10-3
3.825
II 58.62 5.149x10-3
2.601
III 75.86 6.666x10-3
3.366
IV 87.66 7.876x10-3
3.978
V 68.97 6.058x10-3
3.062
VI 65.52 5.756x10-3
2.907
VII 55.17 4.847x10-3
2.448
VIII 79.31 6.968x10-3
3.519
9.2 Performance Graph
Fig - 22: Performance Graph comparing all 8 Cooling
Tower Models
I - Air Inlet Pipe at 0o
without Nozzle
II - Air Inlet Pipe at 30o
Inclined Horizontally without
Nozzle
III - Air Inlet Pipe at 30o
Inclined Vertically without
Nozzle
IV - Air Inlet Pipe at 30o
Inclined Vertically &
Horizontally without Nozzle
V - Air Inlet Pipe at 0o
with Nozzle
VI - Air Inlet Pipe at 30o
VII - Air Inlet Pipe at 30o
VIII - Air Inlet Pipe at 30o
Inclined Vertically &
Horizontally with Nozzle
9.3 Discussion
From the results of analyzed 8 models of cooling tower, the
reference cooling tower model has effectiveness of about
86.21%, meanwhile the modified cooling tower model with
air inlet pipe inclined at 300
about both horizontal and
vertical axis have derived an improved effectiveness of about
87.66%.
Hence the evaporation rate characteristic between air and
water have been varied for cooling tower models due to the
change in contact surface of air and water which have been
caused by varying air inlet angles.
Model
s
Water
inlet
temp
Air
inlet
temp
Water
outlet
temp
Rang
e
Approach
Units K K K K K
I 329 300 304 25 4
II 329 300 312 17 12
III 329 300 307 22 7
IV 329 300 303 26 3
V 329 300 309 20 9
VI 329 300 310 19 10
VII 329 300 313 16 13
VIII 329 300 306 23 6

_______________________________________________________________________________________
As the rate of evaporation has been changing, the amount of
cold water exiting at the outlet varied due to the evaporation
of water. If the rate of evaporation increases then the
effectiveness increases that leads to loss of some amount of
cold water at the outlet which is considered as the
evaporation loss. As the improved effectiveness model has
increased rate of evaporation, the evaporation loss has also
been increased, that leads to loss of some amount of water.
This lost water quantity has to be compensated by make-up
water supply.
Nozzle assembled cooling tower models also show variations
in the outlet water temperature, but improvement in
effectiveness has not been obtained, hence this modification
of air inlet pipe – nozzle assemblage has not reach the
expected objective of effectiveness enhancement.
10. CONCLUSION
On comparing the effectiveness values of 8 cooling tower
models, the cooling tower with air inlet pipe at 0o
and the
cooling tower with air inlet pipe inclined at 300
about both
horizontal and vertical axis have nearly same effectiveness.
Hence both models could be validated experimentally and
implemented for forced draft cooling towers specifically for
small scale industries. Nozzle assembled air inlet pipe
cooling tower models have not obtained any performance
enhancement.
REFERENCES
[1] Priyanka G, M. R. Nagraj, “CFD Analysis of Shell
and Tube Heat Exchanger With and Without Fins for
Waste Heat Recovery Applications”, International
Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN: 2319-
7064 (Online).
[2] Mohd Amir, Fithry, Yusoff, MohdZamri, “Numerical
Investigation of a Single Phase Air Flow inside
Porous Media of a Cross Flow Cooling Tower”,
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR),
ISSN: 2319-7064 (Online).
[3] Ramzi R. Ibraheem , Sherzad N. Muhammed, “Study
Performance of Forced Draft Counter Flow Cooling
Tower”, International Journal of Advances in
Engineering Science and Technology ISSN: 2319-
1120 (Journal).
[4] Dr. Jalal M. Jalil, Dr.Talib K.Murtadha, Dr. Qasim
S. Mehdi, “CFD Prediction of Forced Draft Counter-
Flow Cooling Tower Performance”, Eng. &Tech.
Journal, Vol.28, No.11, 2010. (Journal)
[5] Dr. D. Al. D.H. Alwan Dr. I. W. Maid A. H. Soheel,
“Numerical and Experimental Study of Counter Flow
Cooling Tower Performance with Difference Packs
Porosity and Configuration”, Alwan Technical Report
at Baghdad. (Technical Report)
[6] Nader Pourmahmoud, Amir Hassan Zadeh, Omid
Moutaby, And Abdolreza Bramo, “Computational
Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Helical Nozzles Effects
on the Energy Separation in a Vortex Tube”, Thermal
Science, Year 2012, Vol. 16, No. 1, Pg. 151-166.
(Journal)
[7] “General Design Brochure” , DELTA Cooling
Towers, Inc., PIONEER®, Forced Draft, Counter
Flow Design, 10 - 100 Ton Single Modules. (Design
Brochure)
[8] “ASHRAE Systems and Equipment Hand Book”
(2000), Cooling Towers, Chapter 39. (Hand Book)
[9] “An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics”,
Chapter 20 in Fluid Flow Handbook by Nasser
Ashgriz & Javad Mostaghimi, Department of
Mechanical & Industrial Eng., University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario.(Handbook)
BIOGRAPHIES
S. Parimala Murugaveni received B.E
Mechanical Engineering in Sri
Ramakrishna Engineering College,
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India and
received M.E Engineering Design in
Government College of Technology,
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India and now
she is working as Assistant Professor (Senior Grade) of
Mechanical Engineering Department in Government
College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
P. Mohamed Shameer received the B.E
in Mechanical Engineering from
National College of Engineering,
Kovilpatti, and Tamil Nadu, India in
2013 and he is pursuing M.E in Thermal
Engineering in Government College of
Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu,
India.

Analysis of forced draft cooling tower performance using ansys fluent software

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Analysis of forced draft cooling tower performance using ansys fluent software (20)

More from eSAT Journals (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Analysis of forced draft cooling tower performance using ansys fluent software