Analysis Of Students Mathematical Literacy Skill In Solving Pisa Mathematical Problems

MaPan : Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran
p-ISSN: 2354-6883 ; e-ISSN: 2581-172X
Volume 9, No 1, June 2021 (102-118)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2021v9n1a7
[ 102 ]
Copyright © 2021, MaPan : Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran
ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL LITERACY SKILL IN
SOLVING PISA MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS
Yusfa Lestari1), Abdur Rahman As’ari2), Makbul Muksar3)
1,2,3Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Malang
1,2,3Jl. Semarang 5 Malang 65145 Jawa Timur Indonesia
Email: yusfa.lestari.1903118@students.um.ac.id1), abdur.rahman.fmipa@um.ac.id2),
makbul.muksar.fmipa@um.ac.id3)
Received June 01, 2021; Revised June 08, 2021; Accepted June 11, 2021
Abstract:
This study aims to determine students’ mathematical literacy skills in solving PISA
mathematical problems. Mathematical literacy is the capacity of individuals to
formulate, use, and interpret mathematics in various contexts. Students’ mathematical
literacy skills can be seen in the way students work in solving PISA questions. This
study is qualitative descriptive research. Data from the analysis of students’
mathematical literacy skills were obtained through tests in the form of descriptive
questions adopted from PISA questions, analysis based on indicators of mathematical
literacy skill according to PISA, and the interview results with students who worked
on the PISA questions. This study shows that students’ mathematical literacy skills
were in the medium to the low category; this can be seen from the percentage of
students’ answer scores in working on PISA questions. Therefore, it is necessary to
provide reasoning questions such as PISA questions to help students improve their
mathematical literacy skills.
Keywords: Mathematical Literacy, PISA
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIS SISWA DALAM
MENYELESAIKAN SOAL MATEMATIKA TIPE PISA
Abstrak:
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kemampuan literasi matematis
siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika tipe PISA. Kemampuan literasi matematis
merupakan kapasitas individu untuk memformulasikan, menggunakan, dan
menafsirkan matematika dalam berbagai konteks. Kemampuan literasi matematis
siswa dapat dilihat pada cara kerja siswa menyelesaikan soal-soal tipe PISA. Jenis
penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Data hasil analisis kemampuan
literasi matematis siswa diperoleh melalui pemberian tes berupa soal uraian yang
diadopsi dari soal PISA dan analisis berdasarkan indikator kemampuan literasi
matematis meurut PISA serta hasil wawancara siswa yang mengerjakan soal tersebut.
Hasil dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan literasi matematis
siswa masih tergolong pada kategori sedang hingga rendah, hal ini dapat dilihat dari
persentase skor jawaban siswa dalam mengerjakan soal PISA. Oleh karena itu di

Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Literacy Skill…
Volume 9, No 1, June 2021 |103
sekolah perlu menghadirkan pemberian soal-soal penalaran seperti soal PISA yang
dapat membantu siswa untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi matematis siswa.
Kata Kunci: Literasi Matematis, PISA
How to Cite: Lestari, Y., As’ari, A. R., & Muksar, M. (2021). Analysis of Students’
Mathematical Literacy Skill in Solving PISA Mathematical Problems. MaPan :
Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 9(1), 102-118.
https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2021v9n1a7.
INTRODUCTION
athematical literacy skills in mathematics help humans understand
the role and use of mathematics in life and make correct decisions as
educated humans. In addition, humans can use this skill to solve
problems related to various life contexts mathematically according to
mathematical principles (Rizki & Priatna, 2019); therefore, students from
elementary school to university level need to take mathematics (Newton &
Tonelli, 2020; Rogers & Kosko, 2019; Sarama & Clements 2009; Stodolsky, 1988;
Tatto, Peck, Schwille, Bankov, Senk, Rodriguez, Ingvarson, Reckase, & Rowley,
2012).
Mathematical literacy is still a major challenge in basic mathematics
education, so improving literacy is a challenge worldwide since people need
literacy skills to find, select, interpret, analyze, and produce relevant
information (Genlott & Gronlund, 2016). Previous studies reveal that teachers
have made every effort to improve the teaching and learning processes to
improve students’ mathematics learning achievement (As’ari, 2015). However,
some things remain to be followed up, one of which is related to students’ low
mathematical literacy skills in learning mathematics (Ayalon & Wilkie, 2020;
Hu, Gong, Lai, & Leung, 2018; Ketonen & Hotulainen, 2019).
Mathematical literacy is basically an individual’s ability to formulate,
employ, and interpret mathematics in various contexts. Mathematical literacy
includes mathematical reasoning and using mathematical concepts, procedures,
facts, and tools to describe, explain, and predict phenomena. Mathematical skills
help individuals recognize that mathematics plays a role in every aspect of life
and makes informed decisions needed in a constructive, engaged, and reflective
manner (Colwell & Enderson, 2016; Genlott & Gronlund, 2016; Purpura,
Schmitt, & Ganley, 2017).
M

104| Volume 9, No 1, June 2021
The results of PISA research show that the level of Indonesian
mathematical literacy is always in the bottom 5 position (Fitriyani & Mastur,
2017). The PISA report published by the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) in mathematical literacy, Indonesia was
ranked 68th out of 74 PISA participating countries in 2009, 64th out of 65 PISA
participating countries in 2012, and ranked 65th out of 72 PISA participating
countries in 2015 with 386 points (Hayati & Kamid, 2019). In 2018, Indonesia
achieved a score of 379 for mathematics, which decreased compared to the PISA
results in 2015. This result is very concerning, considering that the ability of
Indonesian students, especially in mathematics at the international level, is still
very low (Asdarina & Ridha, 2020). The data collected show that the
mathematical literacy skills of Indonesian students are low and far from
expectations. In fact, mathematical literacy is an aspect that is considered
important and used in problem-solving in student’s real life (Fitriyani & Mastur,
2017; Hayati & Kamid, 2019; Syawahid, 2019).
Mathematical literacy refers to the ability of students to apply
mathematical knowledge and skills acquired from the classroom to their real-
life experiences and understand any situation involving mathematics. In
addition, mathematical literacy includes the ability to consider ‘when’ and
‘how’ to apply mathematical knowledge. Mathematical literacy consists of two
components, namely knowledge and competence. Knowledge refers to
conceptual and procedural knowledge used to connect and solve mathematical
problems faced in real life. Conceptual knowledge refers to knowledge of facts,
meanings, constructs, ideas, principles, laws, formulas, and concepts on
mathematical topics. Meanwhile, procedural knowledge refers to knowing how
to use mathematical procedures, language and symbols, and interpret and draw
graphs and tables. Competence refers to the ability of students to apply
mathematical knowledge and skills acquired from the classroom to their real-
life and to understand situations involving mathematics (Sumirattana,
Makanong, & Thipkong, 2017).
OECD (2015) divides mathematical literacy into several dimensions,
namely: (a) Content dimension includes space and shape, change and
relationship, quantity and uncertainty; (b) Process dimension includes the
reproduction of definitions and computation, connection and integration for
problem-solving, and reflection on mathematical thinking, generalization, and
understanding; and (c) Situational or contextual dimension includes personal,
educational and occupational, community and science or intra-mathematics.

Furthermore, OECD (2017) states the mathematical processes that
become the basis for analyzing students’ mathematical literacy skills are: (a)
modeling the problem into mathematical form; (b) applying mathematical
concepts, facts, procedures, and reasoning; and (c) interpreting, applying, and
evaluating the results obtained. In addition, in developing the PISA theory,
there are seven basic mathematical skills that are the mainstay of the
mathematical literacy process: (a) Communication, mathematical literacy
involves communication. This is because, when a problem is solved, those who
solve the problem need to express and explain the results of their thoughts to
others so that other people can also understand the results of their thoughts; (b)
Mathematics, mathematical literacy skills also involve abilities in mathematics,
namely the ability to translate everyday language into mathematical forms,
either in the form of concepts, structures, making assumptions or modeling
mathematics; (c) Representation, it is the ability to represent mathematical
objects such as graphs, tables, diagrams, pictures, equations, formulas, and
other concrete forms; (d) Reasoning and arguments, reasoning and
argumentation abilities are the roots of logical thinking processes developed to
find a conclusion that can justify the solution to a problem; (e) Designing
strategies to solve problems, this ability is related to a person’s ability to use
mathematics to solve the problems at hand; (f) The use of symbols, formal and
technical language, and the use of operations, this ability involves
understanding, interpreting, the ability to manipulate a mathematical context
used in solving related problems; (g) The use of mathematical tools, it is the
ability to be able to use various kinds of tools that can help the process of saving
and knowing these limitations.
Mathematical literacy consists of 6 levels (OECD, 2015). The higher the
level, the more complex the problem is. The six levels are presented in the form
of PISA questions. The description of PISA questions based on the level of
students’ mathematical literacy skills is shown in the following table.

Table 1. PISA Students’ Mathematical Literacy Skills Level
Level Description
1 Using knowledge to solve routine problems and
solving general context problems
2 Interpreting problems and solving with formulas
3 Carrying out procedures properly in solving
problems and choosing problem-solving strategies
4 Working effectively with models and selecting and
integrating different representations, then relating
them to the real world
5 Working with models for complex situations and
solving complex problems
6 Using reasoning in solving mathematical problems,
making a generalization, formulating, and
communicating the findings.
PISA questions are used to determine students’ mathematical literacy
abilities since PISA is an international study that focuses on students’
mathematical literacy skills aged 15 years. The PISA questions are created
containing mathematical processes that aim to determine the students’
mathematical literacy skills trying to solve the problems. For this reason, it is
necessary to provide tests to measure students’ mathematical literacy skills.
Referring to the background mentioned above, the researcher raised the topic of
analyzing students’ mathematical literacy skills in solving PISA mathematics
problems.
METHODS
This study is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. This
research type is used to describe students’ mathematical literacy abilities based
on tests in the form of descriptive questions adopted from PISA questions,
analysis based on indicators of mathematical literacy skill according to PISA,
and the results of the interviews with students who worked on the PISA
questions. The analysis results refer to the mathematical literacy process, which
is an indicator in analyzing mathematical literacy skills. The indicators that
become the basis for analyzing mathematical literacy skills according to PISA
theory are: (a) Modeling questions into mathematical form; (b) Applying and
formulating mathematical concepts, facts, procedures, and reasoning; and (c)
Interpreting, applying, and evaluating the results obtained. For deeper analysis,

data was also obtained from the results of interviews about the difficulties and
what students faced when working on mathematics problems (Hu, Gong, Lai,
& Leung, 2018; OECD, 2006; She, Stacey, & Schmidt, 2018)
The research subjects are six students of Grade VII at SMP Negeri 1 Sinjai
Selatan, Sinjai Regency, South Sulawesi Province. The purposive sampling
technique is used to select the subjects based on the considerations and
objectives of the researcher. PISA is an examination system initiated by the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to evaluate
the education system for children or students aged 15 years; therefore, the
researcher’s consideration is that Grade VII students are students with an
average age of 15 years.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This research was carried out on 6 students of Grade VII selected by their
mathematics teacher since they can communicate their thought, either spoken
or written well. Ojose (2013) stated that most people have difficulty working on
literacy questions at levels 4, 5, and 6. Therefore, the researcher tested the test
instrument in the form of test questions on the description of mathematical
literacy skills, which consisted of 3 question items, namely level 4 in question
number 1, level 5 in question number 2, and level 6 in question number 3. The
results of the instrument test about the students’ mathematical literacy abilities
are shown in the following table.
Table 2. Results of the Mathematical Literacy Skill Test
Student
Maximum
Score
Question %
1 2 3 1 2 3
1 3 3 3 1
22.22% 50.00% 22.22%
2 3 0 1 1
3 3 0 1 0
4 3 0 0 1
5 3 0 1 0
6 3 1 3 1
Table 2 shows the results obtained by students in completing test
questions for mathematical literacy skills level 4, 5, and 6. Level 4 shows that the
student percentage only reached an average of 22.22%, which can be categorized
as low, meaning that some students have not been able to represent concrete but

complex real-life situations in mathematical models. Furthermore, Level 5
shows that the percentage of students reached 50%, meaning that students could
understand more complex mathematical models and were sufficiently able to
solve more complicated situations in mathematical models. Finally, Level 6
shows the same percentage as question number 1. The score of each question
item shows that no student could show maximum results, indicating that
students have not been able to do good reasoning in understanding the
mathematics problems.
Furthermore, table 2 illustrates that the mathematical literacy skills of
Grade VII students are still far from expectations, so special attention is needed
about the reasons why students’ mathematical literacy skills are low. It is
expected that students’ mathematical literacy skills can increase according to the
standard for assessing students’ mathematical literacy skills. Ojose (2013) states
that many factors cause such situations, namely home, school, parents, society,
etc. Therefore, it can be seen from a student’s perspective based on the interview
results about the difficulties and what students faced when working on
mathematics problems.
Students' low mathematical literacy skills are triggered by the number of
students who have difficulty working on mathematical literacy skill questions,
as reflected in the student statements during interviews. The following is an
analysis of the results of the students’ mathematical literacy skills test:
1. Level 4
Level 4 question: A pizza seller provides two different pizza sizes but
with the same taste and thickness. The small pizza is 20 cm in diameter and is
sold for IDR 20,000.00, and the large one is 40 cm in diameter and is sold for IDR
40,000.00. Which pizza sale is more profitable for the seller?
There are three kinds of answers given by students. Some answered that
pizza with a diameter of 40 cm, some answered that both pizzas were profitable,
and some answered that pizza with a diameter of 20 cm was more profitable.
Here is the work of students who answered the pizza with 40 cm in diameter.
Figure 1. The Work of Students who Answered 40 cm Pizza was More
Profitable

“A pizza with a diameter of 40 cm sold for IDR 40,000 is more profitable
since customers can enjoy a pizza with a larger size and the same taste and
thickness as a pizza with a diameter of 20 cm.” The initial request for solving
this problem is to find the price per unit area of each pizza. Meanwhile, finding
the idea of solving this problem requires good reasoning and analytical skills.
From the answers above, the student wrote that “customers can enjoy a
larger size pizza.” In fact, the question is which pizza benefits the seller instead
of the consumer. Thus, it can be said that the student is weak in mathematical
ability or translating everyday language into mathematical form, whether it is a
concept, a structure, making assumptions, or modeling mathematics. The
answer above shows that students could not analyze the question properly.
During the interview, students who answered the question like the one above
said they thought what they wanted to look for was pizza which was more
satisfying to customers, and they also said there might be errors when reading
the questions. These interview results indicate that the students could not
understand the contents and intent of the questions correctly, causing them to
be unable to model problems into mathematical form correctly and formulate
or conduct procedures properly. However, students could also experience
reading errors since the question is clear that what is being asked is pizza that
benefits the seller. A study by Wutsqa (2017) revealed that most students have
difficulty translating the problems posed. This is due to the characteristics of
mathematical literacy questions that adopt PISA questions containing context in
each problem, while on the other hand, students are accustomed to solving
questions with closed characteristics and are routine in nature. In addition, a
study by Fakhriyana, Mardiyana, and Aryuna (2018) stated that students who
are not always able to understand mathematics problems can be caused by
students’ low logical ability. In addition, Akbar, Diniyah, Akbar, Nurjaman, and
Bernard (2018) said that students always find it difficult to do mathematics
problems because they think mathematics is not interesting, difficult,
monotonous, and there are too many formulas that are difficult to memorize.
The following is the student’s answer stating that the sale of the two
pizzas is equally profitable:

Figure 2. The Work of Students who Answered Both Pizzas was Profitable
“Neither of the two pizzas is the most profitable since the sales value is
the same if the pizza diameters are the same: (1) We make a pizza with a
diameter of 120 cm. Thus, we make 6 pizzas with a diameter of 20 cm, and the
price is 6 x IDR 20,000 = IDR 120,000; (2) 3 pizzas with a diameter of 40 cm are
made, the price is 3 x IDR 40,000 = IDR 120,000.”
The student answered, “the two pizzas are not the most profitable
because the sales value is the same,” meaning that students understood the
meaning of the problem but were unable to formulate, apply concepts and
procedures to work on the mathematics appropriately. Students only compared
sales prices without any process of modeling and applying the concept first.
This result is in line with a study by Muslimin and Sunardi (2019), stating that
students have not been able to manipulate the questions into formulas used to
solve the problems in the questions. The results of this analysis are actually
different from the research conducted by Wati, Sugiyanti, and Muhtarom (2019),
who found that the process of students’ mathematical literacy skills was
classified as good until the stage of formulating problems mathematically. This
is also confirmed in the students’ interview results who answered questions, as
in figure 2. They said that this method was the only thing they thought of at the
time and did not think that there were other procedures in answering the
question. In addition, other students said that they were accustomed to working
on questions that have explicit formulas (had been taught during the learning
process) so that they were accustomed to working on questions that only needed
to enter numbers in mathematical formulas. This result indicates that reasoning
ability and creative thinking are also very influential on students’ mathematical
literacy skills. Masjaya and Wardono (2018) found that students are generally
not allowed to take the initiative, seek their own answers, and formulate

arguments. Students are generally faced with the question of how to solve the
problem, not why the solution is so.
The following is the student’s answer stating that the 20 cm pizza was
more profitable:
Figure 3. The Work of Students who Answered 20 cm Pizza was More
Profitable
“𝑟1 = 10 𝑐𝑚; 𝑟2 = 20 𝑐𝑚; 𝑙1 = 3,14 × 102
= 314 𝑐𝑚; 𝑙2 = 3,14 × 202
= 1256 𝑐𝑚;
Pizza 1 price =
𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒
𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎
=
20.000
314
= 63,694; Pizza 2 price =
𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒
𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎
=
40.000
1.256
= 31,847”
Figure 3 shows that students were considered to have been able to
answer the questions given and also be able to provide strong reasons for the
answers. Few students were able to answer correctly according to the procedure
for working on the questions. When the student was asked about the question
above, the student answered that he/she had never seen or encountered the
same or similar questions before, but he/she understood that the problem was
about the area of a circular shape. For students who answered question number
one with the work steps above, it can be said that they have good mathematical
literacy skills. This is because they understood the meaning of the questions and
what must be done to answer these questions, meaning that they could
represent the questions well. Choosing to find the area of the two pizzas is a
description of the student’s ability to model the problem into mathematical
form.
Furthermore, students were considered to have a good ability in
reasoning seen from the selection of work procedures before concluding that

they first looked for the price per unit of each pizza. This process measured
students’ reasoning ability. Looking for the price per unit of the two pizzas is an
initial idea. If students reach this stage, it can be said that they have good
reasoning since by knowing the price per unit of each pizza, they can conclude
that 20 cm pizza was more profitable. This result is in line with Hayati and
Kamid (2019) study stating that the essential part of mathematical literacy is the
mathematical process, i.e., the formulating process, using and interpreting, and
evaluating mathematics from various contexts.
2. Level 5
Level 5 question: The nets of a cube-shaped cardboard can be made by
opening the edges of the cardboard. The arrows in the image below show the
direction of cutting the edges of a cardboard. Draw a grid of cardboard
reflecting the image below.
Figure 4. Cube
The question is about space and shape. Only a few students were able to
answer this question. Here is the answer of students who could draw correctly.
Figure 5. The Work of Student for Question Number 2

Question number 2 is considered difficult for students. Only two
students could answer this spatial question, and the rest four students were
unable to answer correctly. Students who could answer this question are
considered to have good spatial abilities. Related to mathematical literacy skills,
this mathematics problem does not require students to design mathematical
models rather than emphasizes spatial abilities, where students were asked to
imagine the results of cubes. Based on the theory of basic mathematical literacy
skills, this problem is more directed on the ability to represent questions with
the help of pictures. If students can answer this question correctly, it can be said
that students’ literacy skills are good in the change and relationship categories.
Students who could not answer this question confirmed in the interview that “I
did not know which piece to start from and open in which direction.” This result
indicates that the students could not understand the instructions on the question
requiring them to follow the direction of the arrow so that the students were
unable to work on the question at all. Viewed from the basic mathematical skills
of students at level four, students were classified as weak in representational
abilities. The representation ability is the ability to represent mathematical
objects such as graphs, tables, diagrams, pictures, equations, formulas, and
other concrete forms. This result is in line with research conducted by
Munfarikhatin, Natsir, and Merauke (2020), stating that some students have not
been able to use their mathematical skills to solve PISA mathematics problems
related to change and relationship contents. Meanwhile, Hasibuan, Fauzi, and
Mukhtar (2019) stated that students’ mathematical literacy skills in change and
relationship contents are generally above average and classified as quite good.
This is different from the results of this study shows that most students find it
difficult to answer correctly. There are many difficulties experienced by
students when solving the PISA questions given. Students expressed that there
were difficulties they faced while answering the questions. One student said
he/she did not understand the meaning of the question, other students felt
anxious and confused when they saw questions that were considered difficult,
so that they were not able to reason or think well to solve the problem.
3. Level 6
Level 6 question: A glass manufacturer produces glasses of the same
shape and size. However, it turns out that there is 1 glass made of material A
mixed with 999 glasses made of material B. The glass made of material A has a
lighter weight than the glass made of material B. The manufacturer only has 1

scale that is able to weigh the most 700 cups with an accuracy level of up to
milligrams. Determine the minimum amount of weighing to obtain 1 glass made
of material A?
No student was able to find the correct answer. Although some of them
could find the initial idea, they failed in continuing the procedure properly.
Here is the student’s almost correct answer:
Figure 6. The Work of Student for Question Number 3
“A total of 1000 glasses. Since the scales can only accommodate 700
glasses, the glasses are divided into two parts, 500 for each. Then, the glass is
weighed, the lightest weight is glass A. Thus, there are 2 weighings.”
This question is the highest indicator category in PISA. The demand of
this question involves mathematical literacy skills in terms of mathematizing,
designing strategies, reasoning, and interpreting. In Figure 6, a student
answered, “the glass is divided into two parts, namely 500 and 500.” This
answer indicates that students already have the initial idea of dividing the same
number of existing glasses and weighing them but failed to proceed to the next
process, i.e., formulating and carrying out mathematical procedures to get the
correct answer. The student’s answer concluded that “so, there were two
weighings.” This indicates that his/her mathematical literacy skills were still
lacking because he/she only involved interpretive skills in answering questions,
namely by dividing the number of glasses in half and weighing them.
Kurniawati & Kurniasari (2019) stated that this happens because the ability to
execute strategies is still relatively lacking. Students have not been able to
continue the initial steps taken to find the correct answer.
Even students found it different to do basic things in mathematics, i.e.,
counting. They did not use the correct procedure in solving the mathematics
problem since they merely guessed the answers. This matter is in line with
Kiswanto, Kenedi, & Helsa (2017) study, stating that several variables can

determine student literacy. In general, these factors can be grouped into two
categories, namely internal and external factors. Internal factors include
cognitive aspects such as intellectual abilities, numerical abilities, and verbal
abilities, while non-cognitive aspects include interest and motivation. The
external factors include the family environment, school environment, mass
media, and social environment.
It is confirmed with the results of interviews showing that the difficulties
experienced by students include difficulties in calculations, understanding
questions, and analyzing questions. Furthermore, the higher the problem
difficulty level, the higher the percentage of difficulty in analyzing the
questions. This indicates students are not familiar with the questions that
require reasoning in solving them rather than getting used to practical
calculation problems. In addition, viewed from the type of questions, students
find it serious difficulty when they have to answer story questions or questions
about problem-solving in the context of everyday life. Thus, students need to be
accustomed to dealing with real-world problems. This is in line with a study by
Sumirattana, Makanong, & Thipkong (2017), stating that using a collaborative
model between realistic mathematics and problem-solving can improve
students’ literacy or mathematical literacy skills.
Referring to the results and discussion of this study and previous
supporting research, students’ mathematical literacy skills can be improved by
getting students to work on questions that require high-order thinking or
reasoning. In addition, it is better to include questions with everyday contexts
that emphasize students’ reasoning abilities to make them get used to digging
around mathematical problems. Thus, the ability to analyze and reason, as well
as students’ mathematical literacy skills can improve and comply with the
expected standards.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study show that students’ mathematical literacy skills
are still in the low category. This is because students found it difficult to
understand and analyzing questions as well as in representing questions in the
form of mathematics, and students are not used to being faced with PISA
standard questions. Therefore, schools need to present a more contextual and
realistic mathematics learning and provide reasoning questions such as PISA
standard questions, which are more helpful for students to improve students’
mathematical literacy skills.

REFERENCES
Akbar, G. A. M., Diniyah, A. N., Akbar, F., Nurjaman, A., & Bernard, M. (2018).
Analisis kemampuan kemampuan penalaran dan self confidence siswa
SMA dalam materi peluang. Journal on Education, 1(1), 14–21. https://
doi.org/10.31004/joe.v1i1.5.
As’ari, A. R. (2015). Berbagai permasalahan pembelajaran matematika dalam
kurikulum 2013 dan beberapa upaya untuk mencoba mengatasinya.
Conference Paper. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1782.4807.
Asdarina, O., & Ridha, M. (2020). Analisis kemampuan penalaran matematis
siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal setara pisa konten geometri. Numeracy,
7(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v7i2.1167.
Colwell, J., & Mary, E. (2016). When I hear literacy: Using pre-service teachers’
perceptions of mathematical literacy to inform program changes in
teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 63–74. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.001.
Fakhriyana, D., Mardiyana, & Aryuna, D. R. (2018). Analisis kemampuan
literasi matematika dalam memecahkan masalah model Programme For
International Student Assessment (PISA) pada konten perubahan dan
hubungan ditinjau dari kecerdasan logis matematis siswa kelas IX SMP
Muhammadiyah program khusus surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan
Matematika Dan Matematika (JPMM) Solusi, 2(6), 421–434. https://doi.
org/10.20961/jpmm%20solusi.v2i6.37672.
Fitriyani, I., & Mastur, Z. (2017). Kemampuan literasi matematika siswa ditinjau
dari kecerdasan emosional pada pembelajaran CPS berbantuan hands on
activity. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(2), 139–147.
Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/
article/view/20457.
Genlott, A. A., & Gronlund, A. (2016). Closing the gaps-improving literacy and
mathematics by ict-enhanced collaboration. Computers and Education, 99,
68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.004.
Hasibuan, S. A., Fauzi, K. M. A., & Mukhtar, M. (2019). Development of PISA
mathematical problem model on the content of change and relationship
to measure students mathematical problem-solving ability. International
Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15. https://doi.org/10.29333/
iejme/6274.
Hayati, T. R., & Kamid, K. (2019). Analysis of mathematical literacy processes in
high school students. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics
Education Research, 2(3), 116. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i3.70.
Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. S. (2018). The relationship between ICT
and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44
countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1–13. https:
//doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.021.

Ketonen, E. E., & Hotulainen, R. (2019). Development of low-stakes mathematics
and literacy test scores during lower secondary school – A multilevel
pattern-centered analysis of student and classroom differences.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101793. https://doi.org/10.1016
/j.cedpsych.2019.101793.
Kiswanto, Kenedi, A., & Helsa, Y. (2017). Literasi matematis dalam
pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan
Guru Sekolah Dasar, 165–174. Retrieved from https://osf.io/538q2.
Kurniawati, I., & Kurniasari, I. (2019). Literasi matematika siswa dalam
menyelesaikan soal pisa konten space and shape ditinjau dari kecerdasan
majemuk. MATHEdunesa, 8(2), 441–448. Retrieved from https://
jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/2
8917.
Masjaya, & Wardono. (2018). Pentingnya kemampuan literasi matematika
untuk menumbuhkan kemampuan koneksi matematika dalam
meningatkan SDM. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1,
568–574. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/
prisma/article/view/20196.
Munfarikhatin, A., Natsir, I., & Merauke, U. M. (2020). Analisis kemampuan
literasi matematika siswa pada konten space and shape. Histogram: Jurnal
Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 128–138. https://dx.doi.org/10.31100/
histogram.v4i1.569.
Muslimin, M., & Sunardi, S. (2019). Analisis kemampuan penalaran matematika
siswa sma pada materi geometri ruang. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-
Inovatif, 10(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v10i2.18323.
Newton, X. A. & Tonelli, E. P. (2020). Building undergraduate STEM majors’
capacity for delivering inquiry-based mathematics and science lessons:
An exploratory evaluation study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100833.
OECD. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A
framework for PISA 2006. Program for international student assessment, 192.
https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264026407-en.
OECD. (2015). Learning for Tomorrow’s World First Results from PISA 2003.
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Mathematics framework. 65–80. https://doi.org/
10.1787/9789264281820-5-en.
Ojose, B. (2013). Mathematics literacy : are we able to put the mathematics we
learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4, 89–100.
Purpura, D. J., Schmitt, S. A., & Ganley, C. M. (2017). Foundations of
mathematics and literacy: The role of executive functioning components.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 153, 15–34. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jecp.2016.08.010.

Rizki, L. M., & Priatna, N. (2019). Mathematical literacy as the 21st-century skill.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/
1742-6596/1157/4/042088.
Rogers, K. C., & Kosko, K. W. (2019). How elementary and collegiate instructors
envision tasks as supportive of mathematical argumentation: A
comparison of instructors’ task constructions. The Journal of Mathematical
Behavior, 53, 228–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb
.2018.08.004.
Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education
research: Learning trajectories for young children. Routledge. https://
doi.org/10.4324/9780203883785.
She, H. C., Stacey, K., & Schmidt, W. H. (2018). Science and mathematics literacy:
PISA for better school education. International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 16, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-
9911-1.
Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social
studies. USA: University of Chicago Press.
Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic
mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to
enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart
Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.
2016.06.001.
Syawahid, M. (2019). Mathematical literacy in algebra reasoning. International
Journal of Insight for Mathematics Teaching, 02(1), 33–46.
Tatto, M. T., Peck, R., Schwille, J., Bankov, K., Senk, S. L., Rodriguez, M.,
Ingvarson, L., Reckase, M., & Rowley, G. (2012). Policy, practice, and
readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries: findings
from the IEA teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-
MM). ERIC.
Wati, M., Sugiyanti, & Muhtarom. (2019). Analisis kemampuan literasi
matematika pada siswa kelas VIII SMP negeri 6 Semarang. Imajiner:
Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1, 97–106.
Wutsqa, D. U. (2017). Kemampuan literasi matematika siswa SMP Negeri se-
Kabupaten Bantul. Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa SMP Negeri Se-
Kabupaten Bantul, 5(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v5i2.
15747.

Analysis Of Students Mathematical Literacy Skill In Solving Pisa Mathematical Problems

More Related Content

Similar to Analysis Of Students Mathematical Literacy Skill In Solving Pisa Mathematical Problems (20)

More from Lisa Muthukumar (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Analysis Of Students Mathematical Literacy Skill In Solving Pisa Mathematical Problems