ATTITUDE
FORMATION
Behavioural approaches
 Belief that one’s attitudes
are the products of direct
experience with attitude
objects.
 Explanations include:
 Mere exposure, classical
conditioning, operant
conditioning, social
learning theory and self-
perception theory.
Task:
The next slide shows photos of four young people...
Apl02   attitude formation and measurement
Apl02   attitude formation and measurement
Apl02   attitude formation and measurement
Apl02   attitude formation and measurement
Apl02   attitude formation and measurement
Apl02   attitude formation and measurement
Apl02   attitude formation and measurement
Apl02   attitude formation and measurement
Out of these people,
which five of the
following do you like
most? Which would
you trust most? Which
do think would be your
friends?
Mere Exposure
 The idea that repeated exposure to an object results in a
strengthened response.
 Mere exposure has most impact when we lack information about
an issue.
Rupert Murdoch’s coverage of the 2013 Election
Classical Conditioning
 Evaluative conditioning – a
stimulus will probably
become more liked or less
liked when consistently
paired with a +ve or –ve
stimuli.
 Spreading attitude effect…
Mary
Enrique and Leon
Marek
Mary
Enrique and Leon
Enrique seen talking to Marek!
Mary dislikes Marek very much…
Marek
Operant Conditioning
 Behaviour that is followed by positive consequences
is reinforced and is more likely to be repeated,
whereas behaviour that is followed by negative
consequences is not.
 When parents reward or punish their children, they
are shaping their attitudes on many issues,
including religion or political beliefs and practices.
 Adults’ attitudes can also be shaped by verbal
reinforcers.
Social Learning theory
 The view that attitude formation is a social learning
process that does not depend on direct reinforcers.
 Based on modelling. Sources include: parents and
media.
 Bandura.
 Children see, Children do
Self-Perception Theory
 Bem (1972) – idea that we gain knowledge of
ourselves only by making self-attributions.
 That is, examining your own behaviour and asking
‘Why did I do that?’.
 E.g. if you often go for long walks, you may
conclude that ‘I must like them, as I’m always doing
that’.
 Bem’s theory suggests that people act, and form
attitudes, without much deliberate thinking.
Measuring attitudes
Explicit or Implicit?
Explicit
 Explicit: people simply asked to agree or disagree
with various statements about their beliefs.
 Assumed in 1930s that explicit measures would get
at people’s real beliefs and opinions  Gallup Polls,
attitude questionnaires on host of social issues.
 Sophisticated scales created...
Attitude Scales
– Likert scale
 Likert (1932) asked respondents to use a five-point
response scale to indicate how much they strongly
agree (5) – strongly disagree (1) with each of a series
of statements.
 Score = total sum across the statements
Guttman Scale
 Guttman (1944) used a set of statements ordered
along a continuum ranging from least extreme to
most extreme.
 Items are cumulative; acceptance of one item
implies acceptance of the others that are less
extreme.
 EgI would accept aliens (1) into my country (2) into my
neighbourhood (3) into my house
Osgood
 Osgood (1957) avoided opinion statements and
focused on the connotative meaning of
words/concepts.
 E.g. Nuclear power is ‘good/bad’, ‘nice/awful’,
‘pleasant/unpleasant’, ‘fair/unfair’,
‘valuable/worthless’
Thurstone Scale
 Thurstone (1928) collected more than 100 statements
of opinion ranging from extremely favourable to
extremely hostile.
 Participants classified statements into eleven
categories on a favourable-unfavourable continuum.
 Responses narrowed items down to twenty-two
items (two for each of the eleven points)
 A person’s attitude score is calculated by averaging
the scale values of the items endorsed.
Scales
Scale Description
Thurstone 100 statements  22 statements across eleven
categories on a favourable-unfavourable
continuum. Score = avg total scale values.
Likert Five-point scale (strongly disagree [5]  strongly
agree[1]). Score = sum of total score.
Guttman Set of statements long a continuum from least
extreme to most extreme. Acceptance of one item
implies acceptance of other items that are less
extreme.
Osgood’s semantic
differential
Focused on connotative meaning people give to a
word/concept. The concept can be measured by
several evaluative scales (good/bad, nice/awful,
pleasant/unpleasant, fair/unfair,
valuable/worthless)
Physiological measures
 Advantage over self-report measures: people may not
realise their attitudes are being assessed or alter their
responses.
 Disadvantages: most are sensitive to variables other than
attitudes and provide little information (indicates
intensity, but not direction).
 Facial expressions: Facial muscle movements linked to
underlying attitudes.
 Social neuroscience: measuring brain activity. Levin
(2000) investigated racial attitudes by measuring event-
related brain potentials that indicate electrical activity
when we respond to different stimuli.
Levin
 White participants viewed a series of white and
black faces, and ERP component indicated that
white faces received more attention
 Suggesting participants processed their racial
ingroup more deeply and the racial outgroup more
superficially.
Measures of overt/covert
behaviour
 Overt
- Unobtrusive measures: dustbins, prints on display
cases, book/DVD withdrawals, etc.
 Covert
- bias in language, priming, Implicit association test
Write 3 statements about the characteristics of a good
friend
Write 3 statements about the characteristics of a person
you dislike (use the name Scar instead of real name)
Linguistic intergroup bias: Maass and colleagues
found:
Type of description Term used Example
+veingroup Abstract/vague Kiki is honest
–veoutgroup Abstract/vague Lois is evil
-veingroup Concrete Kiki swears a lot
+veoutgroup Concrete Lois is good at art
GROUP 1
LOVE
GOOD BAD
Apl02   attitude formation and measurement
GRAND
GOOD BAD
Apl02   attitude formation and measurement
MESSY
GOOD BAD
Apl02   attitude formation and measurement
NASTY
GOOD BAD
Apl02   attitude formation and measurement
FILTH
GOOD BAD
Apl02   attitude formation and measurement
SMART
GOOD BAD
GROUP 2
GRAND
GOOD BAD
MESSY
GOOD BAD
NASTY
GOOD BAD
FILTH
GOOD BAD
SMART
GOOD BAD
PRIMING…
 Kawakami, ,Young and Dovidio (2002): Primed vs
Control (non-primed) group.
1) Primed group was shown a random series of photos of
two different age sets (older and university-age) for 250
milliseconds. Each followed by the word ‘old?’ and
participants responded yes/no on keyboard.
2) Both groups shown a list of strings of words and non-
words and asked to respond Y/N if the word string was
a real word or not. Real words were either age-
stereotypic or not age-stereotypic. (serious, distrustful,
elderly, pensioner vs. practical, jealous, teacher, florist)
Results
 Primed group (but not the control group) were a
little quicker in responding to age-stereotypic
words.
 Primed group took longer overall to respond than
the control group.
Possible reason: the concept elderly activated a
behavioural representation in the memory of people
who are mentally and physically slower than the
young. The participants may have unwittingly
slowed down when they responded.
https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/=Study?tid-1
In Sum…
 Attitudes can be formed from mere exposure, classical
conditioning, operant conditioning, social learning theory
and/or self-perception theory.
 Attitudes can be measured through explicit means (agree or
disagree with various statements about their beliefs) as well as
implicitly (scales, connotative meanings)
 Scales include Thurstone, Likert, Guttman and Osgood’s
semantic differential.
 Attitudes can be measured using physiological techniques
(facial muscle movements, brain activity)
 Measurements of covert attitudes include language bias,
priming and IAT

More Related Content

PPTX
Q3 L02 Attitude Formation and Measurement
PPTX
Attitudes
PPTX
PDF
Formation of Attitude, How it is Changed and Rule of Prejudice
PPTX
Q3L01 - Attitude: definition and components
PPTX
PPTX
Theories of Attitude Change
PPTX
Attitude: Component and Why Study Attiudes
Q3 L02 Attitude Formation and Measurement
Attitudes
Formation of Attitude, How it is Changed and Rule of Prejudice
Q3L01 - Attitude: definition and components
Theories of Attitude Change
Attitude: Component and Why Study Attiudes

What's hot (19)

PPT
If you cannot change attitude, then change behavior ?
PPTX
Attitude social psychology ppt
PPTX
ATTITUDES
PPT
Positivity slideshow 1
PPTX
Attitude and behavior
PPT
Attitudes behavior
PPTX
Presentation on Characteristic of Attitude
PDF
Attitudes & Behavior
PPTX
Attitude formation
PPT
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PPTX
Perception attitude and personality
PPTX
Attitudes
PDF
Attitudes, beliefs and social cognition
PPT
My Attitudes
PPT
Attitude revision
PPT
Attitude ppt(mba hons.)
PPTX
Attitude - A Seminar Presentation
PPTX
Psychology unit iv attitude
PPTX
3 Attitude and Behavior
If you cannot change attitude, then change behavior ?
Attitude social psychology ppt
ATTITUDES
Positivity slideshow 1
Attitude and behavior
Attitudes behavior
Presentation on Characteristic of Attitude
Attitudes & Behavior
Attitude formation
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
Perception attitude and personality
Attitudes
Attitudes, beliefs and social cognition
My Attitudes
Attitude revision
Attitude ppt(mba hons.)
Attitude - A Seminar Presentation
Psychology unit iv attitude
3 Attitude and Behavior
Ad

Similar to Apl02 attitude formation and measurement (20)

PPTX
Introduction to Social Psychology - conformity
DOCX
Chapter 4Attitudes, Attributions, and BehaviorTwo women in .docx
ODP
Introduction to Social Psychology
PPT
Chapter 11 Lecture Disco 4e
PPT
What is Sociology? Notes
PPTX
AS Social Psychology -Introducing conformity
PPT
Problem Solving
ODP
Psychology 102: Social processes, society & culture
PDF
Social influence intro asch & sherif
PPT
Middle Childhood: Cognitive Development
PPTX
Chapter 14
PDF
PSY101 Week 11 Social Psychology
PPTX
Group Theory and Process Presentation
PDF
chapter five1.pdfjckk0ibxts/28:[]%¢፬^።×^
PPT
Units 37 39
PPTX
Attitude Scale.pptx
PPT
Chapter 11 Ppp
PDF
ATTITUDE (1).pdf
Introduction to Social Psychology - conformity
Chapter 4Attitudes, Attributions, and BehaviorTwo women in .docx
Introduction to Social Psychology
Chapter 11 Lecture Disco 4e
What is Sociology? Notes
AS Social Psychology -Introducing conformity
Problem Solving
Psychology 102: Social processes, society & culture
Social influence intro asch & sherif
Middle Childhood: Cognitive Development
Chapter 14
PSY101 Week 11 Social Psychology
Group Theory and Process Presentation
chapter five1.pdfjckk0ibxts/28:[]%¢፬^።×^
Units 37 39
Attitude Scale.pptx
Chapter 11 Ppp
ATTITUDE (1).pdf
Ad

More from Dickson College (20)

PPTX
Apl08 reducing prejudice
PPTX
Apl07 causes of prejudice
PPTX
Apl06 prejudice and discrimination
PPTX
Apl05 cognitive dissonance
PPTX
Apl04 persuasion
PPTX
PPTX
Apl03 interpersonal communication
DOCX
Not Such A Trivial Pursuit Scoreboard
PPTX
12 global citizenship
PPTX
11 prosocial behaviour
PPTX
10 emotional intelligence
PPTX
09 positive relationships2
PPTX
08 stress, coping, trauma, resilience
PPTX
07 self and self efficacy
PPTX
05 parfit
PDF
04 lyubomirsky pdf
PPTX
03 broaden and build
PPTX
02 seligman
PPTX
01 emotional brain
PPTX
Autistic spectrum disorders
Apl08 reducing prejudice
Apl07 causes of prejudice
Apl06 prejudice and discrimination
Apl05 cognitive dissonance
Apl04 persuasion
Apl03 interpersonal communication
Not Such A Trivial Pursuit Scoreboard
12 global citizenship
11 prosocial behaviour
10 emotional intelligence
09 positive relationships2
08 stress, coping, trauma, resilience
07 self and self efficacy
05 parfit
04 lyubomirsky pdf
03 broaden and build
02 seligman
01 emotional brain
Autistic spectrum disorders

Apl02 attitude formation and measurement

  • 2. Behavioural approaches  Belief that one’s attitudes are the products of direct experience with attitude objects.  Explanations include:  Mere exposure, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, social learning theory and self- perception theory.
  • 3. Task: The next slide shows photos of four young people...
  • 12. Out of these people, which five of the following do you like most? Which would you trust most? Which do think would be your friends?
  • 13. Mere Exposure  The idea that repeated exposure to an object results in a strengthened response.  Mere exposure has most impact when we lack information about an issue.
  • 14. Rupert Murdoch’s coverage of the 2013 Election
  • 15. Classical Conditioning  Evaluative conditioning – a stimulus will probably become more liked or less liked when consistently paired with a +ve or –ve stimuli.  Spreading attitude effect…
  • 17. Mary Enrique and Leon Enrique seen talking to Marek! Mary dislikes Marek very much… Marek
  • 18. Operant Conditioning  Behaviour that is followed by positive consequences is reinforced and is more likely to be repeated, whereas behaviour that is followed by negative consequences is not.  When parents reward or punish their children, they are shaping their attitudes on many issues, including religion or political beliefs and practices.  Adults’ attitudes can also be shaped by verbal reinforcers.
  • 19. Social Learning theory  The view that attitude formation is a social learning process that does not depend on direct reinforcers.  Based on modelling. Sources include: parents and media.  Bandura.  Children see, Children do
  • 20. Self-Perception Theory  Bem (1972) – idea that we gain knowledge of ourselves only by making self-attributions.  That is, examining your own behaviour and asking ‘Why did I do that?’.  E.g. if you often go for long walks, you may conclude that ‘I must like them, as I’m always doing that’.  Bem’s theory suggests that people act, and form attitudes, without much deliberate thinking.
  • 23. Explicit  Explicit: people simply asked to agree or disagree with various statements about their beliefs.  Assumed in 1930s that explicit measures would get at people’s real beliefs and opinions  Gallup Polls, attitude questionnaires on host of social issues.  Sophisticated scales created...
  • 24. Attitude Scales – Likert scale  Likert (1932) asked respondents to use a five-point response scale to indicate how much they strongly agree (5) – strongly disagree (1) with each of a series of statements.  Score = total sum across the statements
  • 25. Guttman Scale  Guttman (1944) used a set of statements ordered along a continuum ranging from least extreme to most extreme.  Items are cumulative; acceptance of one item implies acceptance of the others that are less extreme.  EgI would accept aliens (1) into my country (2) into my neighbourhood (3) into my house
  • 26. Osgood  Osgood (1957) avoided opinion statements and focused on the connotative meaning of words/concepts.  E.g. Nuclear power is ‘good/bad’, ‘nice/awful’, ‘pleasant/unpleasant’, ‘fair/unfair’, ‘valuable/worthless’
  • 27. Thurstone Scale  Thurstone (1928) collected more than 100 statements of opinion ranging from extremely favourable to extremely hostile.  Participants classified statements into eleven categories on a favourable-unfavourable continuum.  Responses narrowed items down to twenty-two items (two for each of the eleven points)  A person’s attitude score is calculated by averaging the scale values of the items endorsed.
  • 28. Scales Scale Description Thurstone 100 statements  22 statements across eleven categories on a favourable-unfavourable continuum. Score = avg total scale values. Likert Five-point scale (strongly disagree [5]  strongly agree[1]). Score = sum of total score. Guttman Set of statements long a continuum from least extreme to most extreme. Acceptance of one item implies acceptance of other items that are less extreme. Osgood’s semantic differential Focused on connotative meaning people give to a word/concept. The concept can be measured by several evaluative scales (good/bad, nice/awful, pleasant/unpleasant, fair/unfair, valuable/worthless)
  • 29. Physiological measures  Advantage over self-report measures: people may not realise their attitudes are being assessed or alter their responses.  Disadvantages: most are sensitive to variables other than attitudes and provide little information (indicates intensity, but not direction).  Facial expressions: Facial muscle movements linked to underlying attitudes.  Social neuroscience: measuring brain activity. Levin (2000) investigated racial attitudes by measuring event- related brain potentials that indicate electrical activity when we respond to different stimuli.
  • 30. Levin  White participants viewed a series of white and black faces, and ERP component indicated that white faces received more attention  Suggesting participants processed their racial ingroup more deeply and the racial outgroup more superficially.
  • 31. Measures of overt/covert behaviour  Overt - Unobtrusive measures: dustbins, prints on display cases, book/DVD withdrawals, etc.  Covert - bias in language, priming, Implicit association test
  • 32. Write 3 statements about the characteristics of a good friend Write 3 statements about the characteristics of a person you dislike (use the name Scar instead of real name)
  • 33. Linguistic intergroup bias: Maass and colleagues found: Type of description Term used Example +veingroup Abstract/vague Kiki is honest –veoutgroup Abstract/vague Lois is evil -veingroup Concrete Kiki swears a lot +veoutgroup Concrete Lois is good at art
  • 52. PRIMING…  Kawakami, ,Young and Dovidio (2002): Primed vs Control (non-primed) group. 1) Primed group was shown a random series of photos of two different age sets (older and university-age) for 250 milliseconds. Each followed by the word ‘old?’ and participants responded yes/no on keyboard. 2) Both groups shown a list of strings of words and non- words and asked to respond Y/N if the word string was a real word or not. Real words were either age- stereotypic or not age-stereotypic. (serious, distrustful, elderly, pensioner vs. practical, jealous, teacher, florist)
  • 53. Results  Primed group (but not the control group) were a little quicker in responding to age-stereotypic words.  Primed group took longer overall to respond than the control group. Possible reason: the concept elderly activated a behavioural representation in the memory of people who are mentally and physically slower than the young. The participants may have unwittingly slowed down when they responded.
  • 55. In Sum…  Attitudes can be formed from mere exposure, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, social learning theory and/or self-perception theory.  Attitudes can be measured through explicit means (agree or disagree with various statements about their beliefs) as well as implicitly (scales, connotative meanings)  Scales include Thurstone, Likert, Guttman and Osgood’s semantic differential.  Attitudes can be measured using physiological techniques (facial muscle movements, brain activity)  Measurements of covert attitudes include language bias, priming and IAT

Editor's Notes

  • #32: Bias in language – people more likely to talk in abstract terms than concrete terms about undesirable characteristics of an outgroup and vice versa for desirable characteristicsPriming (activating schemas that influence how we process new information) – pressing button whether an adjective that followed very quickly after a particular image was ‘good’ or ‘bad’. White participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a black image and vice versa.IAT – Participants press different keys on a keyboard or button box to match concepts (e.g. Australian, easy-going). Where an attitude exists, reaction is faster.
  • #33: Maass and colleagues found that people are more likely to talk in abstract terms (Bob is impulsive) than concrete terms (Bob visits a friend) about undesirable characteristics of an outgroup, and vice versa for desirable characteristics.Linguistic intergroup bias!
  • #36: Press a button to indicate where an adjective that followed very quickly after a particular image was good or bad. White participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a black image and black participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a white image.
  • #38: Press a button to indicate where an adjective that followed very quickly after a particular image was good or bad. White participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a black image and black participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a white image.
  • #40: Press a button to indicate where an adjective that followed very quickly after a particular image was good or bad. White participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a black image and black participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a white image.
  • #41: Tell students that next slide will have a word. Put up left hand if the word is considered ‘good’ and right if it’s considered ‘bad’
  • #42: Press a button to indicate where an adjective that followed very quickly after a particular image was good or bad. White participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a black image and black participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a white image.
  • #48: Press a button to indicate where an adjective that followed very quickly after a particular image was good or bad. White participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a black image and black participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a white image.
  • #49: Press a button to indicate where an adjective that followed very quickly after a particular image was good or bad. White participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a black image and black participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a white image.
  • #50: Press a button to indicate where an adjective that followed very quickly after a particular image was good or bad. White participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a black image and black participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a white image.
  • #51: Press a button to indicate where an adjective that followed very quickly after a particular image was good or bad. White participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a black image and black participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a white image.
  • #52: Press a button to indicate where an adjective that followed very quickly after a particular image was good or bad. White participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a black image and black participants were slower in rating a positive adjective as good when it followed a white image.