Apollon wp1 d1 summary
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like388 views
The document summarizes findings from a review of existing tools and lessons learned for cross-border living lab networks. It identifies several European and Nordic living lab networks established since 2006 with a focus on collaboration and knowledge sharing. The networks were formed through a bottom-up process but lack clear rules and procedures. Issues identified include sustainability, culture/competition, and the need for new collaboration methods and tools.
Apollon wp1 d1 summary
- 1. Apollon WP1 D1.1A Catalogue of state-of-the-art concepts, existing tools and lessons learned for cross-border Living Lab networksSummary of the FindingsMay 12, 2010
- 2. Existing tools and lessons learned for cross-border Living Lab networksProcess:WP1 conductedextensive LL network SOTA review and analysis on M1-M6 of Apollon projectFindingscollectedfrom x initiatives in interviews and projectdocumentationreviewsFindingsreported in 4 categories and analyzedwith SWOT and relevance to APOLLON projectScope:EuropeanLivingLab (cross-border) networksNetwork levelcollaboration and managementDevelopmenttrendsMethodologiesSuccessFactors, addedvalue
- 3. BackgroundSince 2006 trendtowardsmorenetworkedforms of livinglabcollaborationObjectivesemphasizelearning, sharing,harmonization and jointprojectsCommon consentregarding the vastpotentialimpact of cross-bordernetworking and sharedpracticesexistNetworks still in earlystages and no specificcriteria, rules, toolsormethodologies for networksexist
- 4. FindingsNetworks established in bottom-upprocessfromindividualinitiativesBothregional and thematicnetworksexistCollaborationprojectbasedVarious management models:based on stages of life cycle, layers of interaction, categorization by use cases, phases of development or Living Lab maturityCulture, contract and competition issues priority topics that must be agreed onIssues with sustainability
- 5. Studied Networks of LivingLabsEuropean Network of Living Labs (ENoLL) - °2006Nordic-Baltic Network of Living labs - °2007The Finnish Network of Living LabsOpen Living Labs Sweden, OLLSE - °2007Network of Dutch Living Labs: Orange Living labs - °2008UK Living labsPortuguese Network of Living LabsProjects:C@R (Collaboration at Rural)EcospaceLaboranovaCOLLABSFinlabENoLL NordicOpenLiteOpen Living Labs SwEden (OLLSE)CoreLabsPanLabII
- 6. ProcessThe applied common validation and consolidation of interview outcomes have been kept very simple by intention and comprises the following information:Main category and sub-category according to the categorization of the APOLLON methodology frameworkThe concept category distinguishing between methodologies, organizational/governance structures and toolsThe origin of the finding naming the project’s or initiative’s name and its conceptA verbal description summarizing the main facts about the findingA SWOT analysis listing strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the findingsAvailable references for further detailsAn indication of the relevance of the findings for the APOLLON methodology framework
- 7. FindingsThe exchange of best practices and lessons learned is seen as the most important goal of the network.When the network has produced concrete output, it is still more a gathering of what is available or possible within (each of) the Living labs.the sustainability of the networks is unsureThere is a lack of clear defined rules and procedures within the network that determine how partners should collaborate with each otherit is required to start developing new methods, tools, protocols, technical requirements and to establish a better exchange and re-usability of processes and procedures creating higher impact on the product / service innovator, the user and the whole local/regional eco-system.leverage their expertise and combine customers and suppliers into a seamlessly integrated value network by embedding their local ecosystems into a broader cross-border ecosystem of Living Lab networks.
- 8. SWOT Analysis of the EuropeanLivingLab Networks
- 9. Sixsuccesscriteria for networkingOpen service architecture that supports intelligent service creation and adaptationSeamless & pervasive environment for service and knowledge discoverySecure, dependable and trustworthy infrastructureNetwork, device and application interoperabilityApplication Support for variety of interfaces
- 10. Apollon Categorization for LivingLab Network Management