SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Archaeological Land Use Characterization using Multispectral Remote Sensing Data Dr. Iván Esteban Villalón Turrubiates,  Member,   IEEE  María de Jesús Llovera Torres Monitoring Hidrological Variations using Multispectral SPOT-5 Data: Regional Case of Jalisco in Mexico Dr. Iván Esteban Villalón Turrubiates,  Member,   IEEE  UNIVERSIDAD DE GUADALAJARA CENTRO UNIVERSITARIO DE LOS VALLES
Overview Abstract Remote Sensing Definition Sensor Resolution Introduction to Image Classification Model Formalism Verification Protocols Simulation Experiments Concluding Remarks
Abstract Proposition  - A new and efficient classification approach of remote sensing signatures extracted from large-scale multispectral imagery. Contribution  -   This approach exploits the idea of combining the spectral signatures from a remote sensing image to perform a novel and accurate classification technique. Verification  -   Simulation results are provided to verify the efficiency of the proposed approach.
REMOTE SENSING DEFINITION
Remote Sensing Remote Sensing can be defined as: "The arte and science to obtain data from an object avoiding direct contact with it” (Jensen 2000). There is a transmission medium involved?
 
Remote Sensing Of the Environment : …  is the collection of information regarding our Planet surface and its phenomena involving sensors that are not in direct contact with the studied area. The main focus is in recollected information from a spatial perspective throughout electromagnetic radiation transmission.
 
Remote Sensing Sensor election . Reception, storage and digital signal processing of the data . Analysis of the resulting information.
A) Illumination Source B) Radiation C) Interaction with the object D) Radiation sensing E) Transmission, reception and data processing F) Analysis and interpretation G) Application Process
SENSOR RESOLUTION
Resolution All  remote sensing systems use four types of resolution: Spatial Spectral Temporal Radiometric
Spatial Resolution
Spectral Resolution
Temporal Resolution Time July 1 July 12 July 23 August 3 11 days 16 days July 2 July 8 August 3
Radiometric Resolution 6-bits Range 0 63 8-bits Range 0 255 0 10-bits Range 1023
INTRODUCTION TO IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
Image Classification Why classify? Make sense of a landscape Place landscape into categories (classes) Forest, Agriculture, Water, Soil, etc. Classification scheme = structure of classes Depends on needs of users.
Typical uses Provide context Landscape planning or assessment Research projects Natural resources management Archaeological studies Drive models Meteorology Biodiversity Water distribution Land use
Example: Near Mary’s Peak Derived from a 1988 Landsat TM image Distinguish types of forest Open Semi-open Broadleaf Mixed Young Conifer Mature Conifer Old Conifer Legend
Classification: Critical Point LAND COVER not necessarily equivalent to LAND USE We focus on what’s there: LAND COVER Many users are interested in how what is there is being used:  LAND USE Example Grass is land cover; pasture and recreational parks are  land uses  of grass
Basic Strategy: How to do it?  Use radiometric properties of remote sensor Different objects have different spectral signatures
In an easy world, all “vegetation” pixels would have exactly the same spectral signature. Then we could just say that any pixel in an image with that signature was vegetation. We could do the same for soil, water, etc. to end up with a map of classes. Basic Strategy: How to do it?
Basic Strategy: How to do it?  But in reality, that is not the case. Looking at several pixels with vegetation, you’d see variety in spectral signatures.  The same would happen for other types of pixels, as well.
The Classification Trick:  Deal with variability Different ways of dealing with the variability lead to different ways of classifying images. To talk about this, we need to look at spectral signatures a little differently.
Think of a pixel’s brightness in a 2-Dimensional space. The pixel occupies a point in that space. The vegetation pixel and the soil pixel occupy different points in a 2-D space.
With variability, the vegetation pixels now occupy a region, not a point, of n-Dimensional space. Soil pixels occupy a different region of  n-Dimensional space.
Basic Strategy:  Deal with variability Classification:  Delineate boundaries of classes in n-dimensional space Assign class names to pixels using those boundaries
Classification Strategies Two basic strategies: Supervised Classification We impose our perceptions on the spectral data. Unsupervised Classification Spectral data imposes constraints on our interpretation.
Supervised Classification The computer then creates... Supervised classification requires the analyst to select training areas where he knows what is on the ground and then digitize a polygon within that area… Mean  Spectral Signatures Known Conifer Area Known Water Area Known Deciduous Area Digital Image Conifer Deciduous Water
Supervised Classification Multispectral Image Information (Classified Image) Mean  Spectral Signatures Spectral Signature of Next Pixel to be Classified Conifer Deciduous Water Unknown
The Result: Image Signatures Water Conifer Deciduous Legend: Land Cover Map
Unsupervised Classification In unsupervised classification, the spectral data imposes constraints on our interpretation. How? Rather than defining training sets and carving out pieces of n-Dimensional space, we define  no  classes beforehand and instead use statistical approaches to divide the n-Dimensional space into clusters with the  best separation. After the fact, we assign class names to those clusters.
Unsupervised Classification Digital Image The analyst requests the computer to examine the image and extract a number of spectrally distinct clusters…  Spectrally Distinct Clusters Cluster 3 Cluster 5 Cluster 1 Cluster 6 Cluster 2 Cluster 4
Unsupervised Classification Output Classified Image Saved Clusters Cluster 3 Cluster 5 Cluster 1 Cluster 6 Cluster 2 Cluster 4 Unknown Next Pixel to be Classified
Unsupervised Classification It is a simple process to regroup (recode) the clusters into meaningful information classes (the legend). The result is essentially the same as that of the supervised classification: Conif. Hardw. Water Land Cover Map Legend Water Water Conifer Conifer Hardwood Hardwood Labels
MODEL FORMALISM
Multispectral Imaging Is a technology originally developed for space-based imaging. Multispectral images are the main type of images acquired by remote sensing radiometers. Usually, remote sensing systems have from 3 to 7 radiometers; each one acquires one digital image in a small band of visible spectra, ranging 450 to 690 nm, called  red-green-blue  (RGB) regions: Blue -> 450-520 nm. Green -> 520-600 nm. Red -> 600-690 nm. The combination of the RGB spectral bands generates the so-called True-Color RS images.
Statistical Approach. Assume normal distributions of pixels within classes. For each class, build a discriminant function  For each pixel in the image, this function calculates the probability that the pixel is a member of that class. Takes into account  mean  and  variance  of training set. Each pixel is assigned to the class for which it has the highest probability of membership. Weighted Pixel Statistics Method
Blue Green Red Near-IR Mid-IR Mean Signature 1 Candidate Pixel Mean Signature 2 It appears that the candidate pixel is closest to Signature 1.  However, when we consider the variance around the signatures… Relative Reflectance Weighted Pixel Statistics Method
Blue Green Red Near-IR Mid-IR Mean Signature 1 Candidate Pixel Mean Signature 2 The candidate pixel clearly belongs to the signature 2 group. Relative Reflectance Weighted Pixel Statistics Method
Weighted Pixel Statistics Method
Weighted Pixel Statistics Method
VERIFICATION PROTOCOLS
Verification Protocols A set of three synthesized images are used as verification protocols. All synthesized images are True-Color (RGB), presented in 1024-by-1024 pixels (TIFF format). Each synthesized image contains three different regions (in yellow, blue and black colors) with a different pattern. The developed Weighted Pixel Statistics ( WPS ) algorithm is compared with the most traditional Weighted Order Statistics ( WOS ) method [S.W. Perry, H.S. Wong, 2002].
Results: 1 st  Synthesized Scene Synthesized Scene WOS Classification WPS Classification
Quantitative Comparison 1 st  Synthesized Scene
Results: 2 nd  Synthesized Scene Synthesized Scene WOS Classification WPS Classification
Qualitative Comparison 2 nd  Synthesized Scene Synthesized Scene WOS Classification WPS Classification
Quantitative Comparison 2 nd  Synthesized Scene
Results: 3 rd   Synthesized Scene Synthesized Scene WOS Classification WPS Classification
Qualitative Comparison 3 rd  Synthesized Scene Synthesized Scene WOS Classification WPS Classification
Quantitative Comparison 3 rd  Synthesized Scene
Remarks The quantitative study is performed calculating the classified percentage obtained with the WOS and WPS methods, respectively. The  WOS  method uses only 1 spectral band. The  WPS  method uses the information from the three spectral bands to analyze the pixel-level neighborhood means and variances. The results shows a more accurate and less smoothed identification of the classes.
SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS
Archaeological Land Use A Remote Sensing Signatures (RSS) electronic map is extracted from the multispectral image. Three level RSS are selected for this particular simulation process, defined as: ██ –  Archaeological land use zones.  ██  –  Modern land use zones.  ██  –  Natural land cover zones.  ██  –  Unclassified zones.
Archaeological Site "Guachimontones", Jalisco Mexico
Simulation Results Scene from "Guachimontones" Original Scene WPS Classification
Hidrological Variations A Remote Sensing Signatures (RSS) electronic map is extracted from the multispectral image. Three level RSS are selected for this particular simulation process, defined as: ██ –  Humid zones.  ██  –  Dry zones.  ██  –  Wet zones.  ██  –  Unclassified zones.
Simulation Results Scene from "La Vega" dam, Jalisco Mexico Original Scene WPS Classification
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Remarks The  WOS  classifier generates several unclassified zones because it uses only one spectral band in the classification process. The  WPS  classifier provides a high-accurate classification without unclassified zones because it uses more robust information in the processing. The qualitative and quantitative analysis probe the efficiency of the proposed approach.
Future Work Comparison with several classification techniques. A more extensive performance analysis of the proposed approach with different synthesized images. Application to remote sensing imagery and the study of its performance. Hardware implementation of the proposed approach.
Dr. Iván Esteban Villalón Turrubiates,  Member,   IEEE UNIVERSIDAD DE GUADALAJARA CENTRO UNIVERSITARIO DE LOS VALLES THANK YOU! Questions?

More Related Content

PDF
Scale and resolution
PDF
Science
PDF
spatial resolutionin remote sensing
DOCX
Advanced Remote Sensing Project Report
PDF
Congenital Bucolic and Farming Region Taxonomy Using Neural Networks for Remo...
PPTX
Resolution and scanning system
PPT
Chapter 5: Remote sensing
PPTX
Remote sensing
Scale and resolution
Science
spatial resolutionin remote sensing
Advanced Remote Sensing Project Report
Congenital Bucolic and Farming Region Taxonomy Using Neural Networks for Remo...
Resolution and scanning system
Chapter 5: Remote sensing
Remote sensing

What's hot (7)

PDF
tesi_completa
PPTX
Optical Remote sensing with case studies
PDF
Auto Level Color Correction f or Underwater Image Matching Optimization
PDF
Classification of Radar Returns from Ionosphere Using NB-Tree and CFS
PDF
PhysRevLett.105.163602
PDF
Investigation of Chaotic-Type Features in Hyperspectral Satellite Data
PDF
An Efficient K-Nearest Neighbors Based Approach for Classifying Land Cover Re...
tesi_completa
Optical Remote sensing with case studies
Auto Level Color Correction f or Underwater Image Matching Optimization
Classification of Radar Returns from Ionosphere Using NB-Tree and CFS
PhysRevLett.105.163602
Investigation of Chaotic-Type Features in Hyperspectral Satellite Data
An Efficient K-Nearest Neighbors Based Approach for Classifying Land Cover Re...
Ad

Viewers also liked (9)

PPT
Lagios_et_al_IGARSS_2011.ppt
PPTX
3-Johnson.pptx
PPT
IGARSS_29_07_2011.ppt
PPT
2 ShengleiZhang_IGARSS2011_MO3.T04.2.ppt
PDF
IGARSS11_VC_ppt.pdf
PPT
De vigtigste dimensioneringsprincipper for gravitationsfundamenter
PDF
Ajeds volume 9 no 1 june 2012
PPTX
CHARACTERIZATION OF SINGULAR STRUCTURES IN POLARIMETRIC SAR IMAGES BY WAVELET...
PDF
Modellering af jord-struktur-interaktion i jordskælvsanalyser for Izmit Bay ...
Lagios_et_al_IGARSS_2011.ppt
3-Johnson.pptx
IGARSS_29_07_2011.ppt
2 ShengleiZhang_IGARSS2011_MO3.T04.2.ppt
IGARSS11_VC_ppt.pdf
De vigtigste dimensioneringsprincipper for gravitationsfundamenter
Ajeds volume 9 no 1 june 2012
CHARACTERIZATION OF SINGULAR STRUCTURES IN POLARIMETRIC SAR IMAGES BY WAVELET...
Modellering af jord-struktur-interaktion i jordskælvsanalyser for Izmit Bay ...
Ad

Similar to ARCHAEOLOGICAL LAND USE CHARACTERIZATION USING MULTISPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING DATA (20)

PPT
Remote Sensing Lec 11
PPTX
Digital_Image_Classification.pptx
PDF
Multispectral Image Analysis Using Random Forest
PDF
Multispectral image analysis using random
PDF
Semi-Automatic Classification Algorithm: The differences between Minimum Dist...
PPT
Lrm 111 intro remote sensing lesson vii
PDF
Performance of RGB and L Base Supervised Classification Technique Using Multi...
PPTX
Lecture 4 Digital Image Processing (1).pptx
PDF
Automatic traffic light controller for emergency vehicle using peripheral int...
PDF
CLASSIFICATION AND COMPARISION OF REMOTE SENSING IMAGE USING SUPPORT VECTOR M...
PPT
Image classification, remote sensing, P K MANI
PPTX
Digital image processing
PDF
L12 GIS (a).pdf
PDF
Image classification in remote sensing
PDF
H017344752
PDF
Object-Oriented Approach of Information Extraction from High Resolution Satel...
PPT
IGARSS_NITISH_ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR MIXED PIXEL RESOLUTION.ppt
PDF
Spectralspatial Classification Of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Images 1st Edi...
PDF
RECAP Horizon 2020 Project - 1st RECAP Webinar
PDF
Object Classification of Satellite Images Using Cluster Repulsion Based Kerne...
Remote Sensing Lec 11
Digital_Image_Classification.pptx
Multispectral Image Analysis Using Random Forest
Multispectral image analysis using random
Semi-Automatic Classification Algorithm: The differences between Minimum Dist...
Lrm 111 intro remote sensing lesson vii
Performance of RGB and L Base Supervised Classification Technique Using Multi...
Lecture 4 Digital Image Processing (1).pptx
Automatic traffic light controller for emergency vehicle using peripheral int...
CLASSIFICATION AND COMPARISION OF REMOTE SENSING IMAGE USING SUPPORT VECTOR M...
Image classification, remote sensing, P K MANI
Digital image processing
L12 GIS (a).pdf
Image classification in remote sensing
H017344752
Object-Oriented Approach of Information Extraction from High Resolution Satel...
IGARSS_NITISH_ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR MIXED PIXEL RESOLUTION.ppt
Spectralspatial Classification Of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Images 1st Edi...
RECAP Horizon 2020 Project - 1st RECAP Webinar
Object Classification of Satellite Images Using Cluster Repulsion Based Kerne...

More from grssieee (20)

PDF
Tangent height accuracy of Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission S...
PDF
SEGMENTATION OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA WITH A MULTI-TEXTURE PRODUCT MODEL
PPTX
TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMET...
PPT
THE SENTINEL-1 MISSION AND ITS APPLICATION CAPABILITIES
PPTX
GMES SPACE COMPONENT:PROGRAMMATIC STATUS
PPTX
PROGRESSES OF DEVELOPMENT OF CFOSAT SCATTEROMETER
PPT
DEVELOPMENT OF ALGORITHMS AND PRODUCTS FOR SUPPORTING THE ITALIAN HYPERSPECTR...
PPT
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
PPT
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
PPT
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
PDF
Test
PPT
test 34mb wo animations
PPT
Test 70MB
PPT
Test 70MB
PDF
2011_Fox_Tax_Worksheets.pdf
PPT
DLR open house
PPT
DLR open house
PPT
DLR open house
PPT
Tana_IGARSS2011.ppt
PPT
Solaro_IGARSS_2011.ppt
Tangent height accuracy of Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission S...
SEGMENTATION OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA WITH A MULTI-TEXTURE PRODUCT MODEL
TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMET...
THE SENTINEL-1 MISSION AND ITS APPLICATION CAPABILITIES
GMES SPACE COMPONENT:PROGRAMMATIC STATUS
PROGRESSES OF DEVELOPMENT OF CFOSAT SCATTEROMETER
DEVELOPMENT OF ALGORITHMS AND PRODUCTS FOR SUPPORTING THE ITALIAN HYPERSPECTR...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
Test
test 34mb wo animations
Test 70MB
Test 70MB
2011_Fox_Tax_Worksheets.pdf
DLR open house
DLR open house
DLR open house
Tana_IGARSS2011.ppt
Solaro_IGARSS_2011.ppt

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
PDF
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
PPTX
Detection-First SIEM: Rule Types, Dashboards, and Threat-Informed Strategy
PDF
Bridging biosciences and deep learning for revolutionary discoveries: a compr...
PDF
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
PDF
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
PDF
Chapter 3 Spatial Domain Image Processing.pdf
PDF
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
PDF
[발표본] 너의 과제는 클라우드에 있어_KTDS_김동현_20250524.pdf
PDF
GDG Cloud Iasi [PUBLIC] Florian Blaga - Unveiling the Evolution of Cybersecur...
PDF
GamePlan Trading System Review: Professional Trader's Honest Take
PDF
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
PDF
Advanced Soft Computing BINUS July 2025.pdf
DOCX
The AUB Centre for AI in Media Proposal.docx
PPTX
PA Analog/Digital System: The Backbone of Modern Surveillance and Communication
PPTX
Big Data Technologies - Introduction.pptx
PDF
Optimiser vos workloads AI/ML sur Amazon EC2 et AWS Graviton
PDF
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
PDF
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
PPTX
Effective Security Operations Center (SOC) A Modern, Strategic, and Threat-In...
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
Detection-First SIEM: Rule Types, Dashboards, and Threat-Informed Strategy
Bridging biosciences and deep learning for revolutionary discoveries: a compr...
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
Chapter 3 Spatial Domain Image Processing.pdf
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
[발표본] 너의 과제는 클라우드에 있어_KTDS_김동현_20250524.pdf
GDG Cloud Iasi [PUBLIC] Florian Blaga - Unveiling the Evolution of Cybersecur...
GamePlan Trading System Review: Professional Trader's Honest Take
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
Advanced Soft Computing BINUS July 2025.pdf
The AUB Centre for AI in Media Proposal.docx
PA Analog/Digital System: The Backbone of Modern Surveillance and Communication
Big Data Technologies - Introduction.pptx
Optimiser vos workloads AI/ML sur Amazon EC2 et AWS Graviton
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
Effective Security Operations Center (SOC) A Modern, Strategic, and Threat-In...

ARCHAEOLOGICAL LAND USE CHARACTERIZATION USING MULTISPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING DATA

  • 1. Archaeological Land Use Characterization using Multispectral Remote Sensing Data Dr. Iván Esteban Villalón Turrubiates, Member, IEEE María de Jesús Llovera Torres Monitoring Hidrological Variations using Multispectral SPOT-5 Data: Regional Case of Jalisco in Mexico Dr. Iván Esteban Villalón Turrubiates, Member, IEEE UNIVERSIDAD DE GUADALAJARA CENTRO UNIVERSITARIO DE LOS VALLES
  • 2. Overview Abstract Remote Sensing Definition Sensor Resolution Introduction to Image Classification Model Formalism Verification Protocols Simulation Experiments Concluding Remarks
  • 3. Abstract Proposition - A new and efficient classification approach of remote sensing signatures extracted from large-scale multispectral imagery. Contribution - This approach exploits the idea of combining the spectral signatures from a remote sensing image to perform a novel and accurate classification technique. Verification - Simulation results are provided to verify the efficiency of the proposed approach.
  • 5. Remote Sensing Remote Sensing can be defined as: "The arte and science to obtain data from an object avoiding direct contact with it” (Jensen 2000). There is a transmission medium involved?
  • 6.  
  • 7. Remote Sensing Of the Environment : … is the collection of information regarding our Planet surface and its phenomena involving sensors that are not in direct contact with the studied area. The main focus is in recollected information from a spatial perspective throughout electromagnetic radiation transmission.
  • 8.  
  • 9. Remote Sensing Sensor election . Reception, storage and digital signal processing of the data . Analysis of the resulting information.
  • 10. A) Illumination Source B) Radiation C) Interaction with the object D) Radiation sensing E) Transmission, reception and data processing F) Analysis and interpretation G) Application Process
  • 12. Resolution All remote sensing systems use four types of resolution: Spatial Spectral Temporal Radiometric
  • 15. Temporal Resolution Time July 1 July 12 July 23 August 3 11 days 16 days July 2 July 8 August 3
  • 16. Radiometric Resolution 6-bits Range 0 63 8-bits Range 0 255 0 10-bits Range 1023
  • 17. INTRODUCTION TO IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
  • 18. Image Classification Why classify? Make sense of a landscape Place landscape into categories (classes) Forest, Agriculture, Water, Soil, etc. Classification scheme = structure of classes Depends on needs of users.
  • 19. Typical uses Provide context Landscape planning or assessment Research projects Natural resources management Archaeological studies Drive models Meteorology Biodiversity Water distribution Land use
  • 20. Example: Near Mary’s Peak Derived from a 1988 Landsat TM image Distinguish types of forest Open Semi-open Broadleaf Mixed Young Conifer Mature Conifer Old Conifer Legend
  • 21. Classification: Critical Point LAND COVER not necessarily equivalent to LAND USE We focus on what’s there: LAND COVER Many users are interested in how what is there is being used: LAND USE Example Grass is land cover; pasture and recreational parks are land uses of grass
  • 22. Basic Strategy: How to do it? Use radiometric properties of remote sensor Different objects have different spectral signatures
  • 23. In an easy world, all “vegetation” pixels would have exactly the same spectral signature. Then we could just say that any pixel in an image with that signature was vegetation. We could do the same for soil, water, etc. to end up with a map of classes. Basic Strategy: How to do it?
  • 24. Basic Strategy: How to do it? But in reality, that is not the case. Looking at several pixels with vegetation, you’d see variety in spectral signatures. The same would happen for other types of pixels, as well.
  • 25. The Classification Trick: Deal with variability Different ways of dealing with the variability lead to different ways of classifying images. To talk about this, we need to look at spectral signatures a little differently.
  • 26. Think of a pixel’s brightness in a 2-Dimensional space. The pixel occupies a point in that space. The vegetation pixel and the soil pixel occupy different points in a 2-D space.
  • 27. With variability, the vegetation pixels now occupy a region, not a point, of n-Dimensional space. Soil pixels occupy a different region of n-Dimensional space.
  • 28. Basic Strategy: Deal with variability Classification: Delineate boundaries of classes in n-dimensional space Assign class names to pixels using those boundaries
  • 29. Classification Strategies Two basic strategies: Supervised Classification We impose our perceptions on the spectral data. Unsupervised Classification Spectral data imposes constraints on our interpretation.
  • 30. Supervised Classification The computer then creates... Supervised classification requires the analyst to select training areas where he knows what is on the ground and then digitize a polygon within that area… Mean Spectral Signatures Known Conifer Area Known Water Area Known Deciduous Area Digital Image Conifer Deciduous Water
  • 31. Supervised Classification Multispectral Image Information (Classified Image) Mean Spectral Signatures Spectral Signature of Next Pixel to be Classified Conifer Deciduous Water Unknown
  • 32. The Result: Image Signatures Water Conifer Deciduous Legend: Land Cover Map
  • 33. Unsupervised Classification In unsupervised classification, the spectral data imposes constraints on our interpretation. How? Rather than defining training sets and carving out pieces of n-Dimensional space, we define no classes beforehand and instead use statistical approaches to divide the n-Dimensional space into clusters with the best separation. After the fact, we assign class names to those clusters.
  • 34. Unsupervised Classification Digital Image The analyst requests the computer to examine the image and extract a number of spectrally distinct clusters… Spectrally Distinct Clusters Cluster 3 Cluster 5 Cluster 1 Cluster 6 Cluster 2 Cluster 4
  • 35. Unsupervised Classification Output Classified Image Saved Clusters Cluster 3 Cluster 5 Cluster 1 Cluster 6 Cluster 2 Cluster 4 Unknown Next Pixel to be Classified
  • 36. Unsupervised Classification It is a simple process to regroup (recode) the clusters into meaningful information classes (the legend). The result is essentially the same as that of the supervised classification: Conif. Hardw. Water Land Cover Map Legend Water Water Conifer Conifer Hardwood Hardwood Labels
  • 38. Multispectral Imaging Is a technology originally developed for space-based imaging. Multispectral images are the main type of images acquired by remote sensing radiometers. Usually, remote sensing systems have from 3 to 7 radiometers; each one acquires one digital image in a small band of visible spectra, ranging 450 to 690 nm, called red-green-blue (RGB) regions: Blue -> 450-520 nm. Green -> 520-600 nm. Red -> 600-690 nm. The combination of the RGB spectral bands generates the so-called True-Color RS images.
  • 39. Statistical Approach. Assume normal distributions of pixels within classes. For each class, build a discriminant function For each pixel in the image, this function calculates the probability that the pixel is a member of that class. Takes into account mean and variance of training set. Each pixel is assigned to the class for which it has the highest probability of membership. Weighted Pixel Statistics Method
  • 40. Blue Green Red Near-IR Mid-IR Mean Signature 1 Candidate Pixel Mean Signature 2 It appears that the candidate pixel is closest to Signature 1. However, when we consider the variance around the signatures… Relative Reflectance Weighted Pixel Statistics Method
  • 41. Blue Green Red Near-IR Mid-IR Mean Signature 1 Candidate Pixel Mean Signature 2 The candidate pixel clearly belongs to the signature 2 group. Relative Reflectance Weighted Pixel Statistics Method
  • 45. Verification Protocols A set of three synthesized images are used as verification protocols. All synthesized images are True-Color (RGB), presented in 1024-by-1024 pixels (TIFF format). Each synthesized image contains three different regions (in yellow, blue and black colors) with a different pattern. The developed Weighted Pixel Statistics ( WPS ) algorithm is compared with the most traditional Weighted Order Statistics ( WOS ) method [S.W. Perry, H.S. Wong, 2002].
  • 46. Results: 1 st Synthesized Scene Synthesized Scene WOS Classification WPS Classification
  • 47. Quantitative Comparison 1 st Synthesized Scene
  • 48. Results: 2 nd Synthesized Scene Synthesized Scene WOS Classification WPS Classification
  • 49. Qualitative Comparison 2 nd Synthesized Scene Synthesized Scene WOS Classification WPS Classification
  • 50. Quantitative Comparison 2 nd Synthesized Scene
  • 51. Results: 3 rd Synthesized Scene Synthesized Scene WOS Classification WPS Classification
  • 52. Qualitative Comparison 3 rd Synthesized Scene Synthesized Scene WOS Classification WPS Classification
  • 53. Quantitative Comparison 3 rd Synthesized Scene
  • 54. Remarks The quantitative study is performed calculating the classified percentage obtained with the WOS and WPS methods, respectively. The WOS method uses only 1 spectral band. The WPS method uses the information from the three spectral bands to analyze the pixel-level neighborhood means and variances. The results shows a more accurate and less smoothed identification of the classes.
  • 56. Archaeological Land Use A Remote Sensing Signatures (RSS) electronic map is extracted from the multispectral image. Three level RSS are selected for this particular simulation process, defined as: ██ – Archaeological land use zones. ██ – Modern land use zones. ██ – Natural land cover zones. ██ – Unclassified zones.
  • 58. Simulation Results Scene from "Guachimontones" Original Scene WPS Classification
  • 59. Hidrological Variations A Remote Sensing Signatures (RSS) electronic map is extracted from the multispectral image. Three level RSS are selected for this particular simulation process, defined as: ██ – Humid zones. ██ – Dry zones. ██ – Wet zones. ██ – Unclassified zones.
  • 60. Simulation Results Scene from "La Vega" dam, Jalisco Mexico Original Scene WPS Classification
  • 62. Remarks The WOS classifier generates several unclassified zones because it uses only one spectral band in the classification process. The WPS classifier provides a high-accurate classification without unclassified zones because it uses more robust information in the processing. The qualitative and quantitative analysis probe the efficiency of the proposed approach.
  • 63. Future Work Comparison with several classification techniques. A more extensive performance analysis of the proposed approach with different synthesized images. Application to remote sensing imagery and the study of its performance. Hardware implementation of the proposed approach.
  • 64. Dr. Iván Esteban Villalón Turrubiates, Member, IEEE UNIVERSIDAD DE GUADALAJARA CENTRO UNIVERSITARIO DE LOS VALLES THANK YOU! Questions?

Editor's Notes

  • #6: Information usually gathered from spacecraft or an airplane, but can be a handheld or boom-mounted device. Originally defined in 1960’s according to Jensen, to encompass photogrammertry and information gathered from nonphotometric sources.