Artificial intelligence ai choice mechanism hypothesis of a mathematical method

Advances in Physics Theories and Applications www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-719X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0638 (Online)
Vol 7, 2012

Artificial Intelligence AI
Choice Mechanism
Hypothesis of a Mathematical Method that
Describes Quantum Numbers, Quantum Entanglement And
Expanding Universe or Universes
Proving
That
Something can evolve from Nothing
(.i.e. numbers evolving from non-existent illusion)
Martins Kolawole Alabi
E-mail: alabikmartins@gmail.com
Abstract
1. To device a mathematical method that can generate quantum numbers showing a complete model of a
quantum system which includes a wavefunction, a quantum state which is a set of mathematical variables that
fully describes a quantum system. For example, set of 4 numbers {n, l, m, s} that defines the state of an
electron.
2. To show quantum entanglement- the spin of an electron (plus and minus value) is opposite.
3. To show a shift of all quantum numbers with homogeneity having the same observational evidence available
to observers at different locations that can be mapped with an expanding universe.
4. To test that the spin quantum number labeled as equal plus and minus values is powered by co-existence of
triplet numbers 1, 2 and 3 which determine (wavefunction) the location of finding a particle in space. This can
lead to a mechanism that would return the information down black holes .i.e. numbers evolving from a
non-existent illusion.
Keywords: quantum numbers, quantum entanglement, wave function, expanding universe, shape of the
universe

1. Introduction
Basic constituents of matter are quarks and leptons. Both of these subatomic particles are fermions and bosons.
Fermions are defined by half-integer: They are elementary particles that have a particle spin equal to a
half-integer value (-1/2, 1/2, 3/2. etc). They include (electrons, neutrinos, quarks, protons and neutrons, and
helium-3 atoms). These particles made up of the matter that we observe in our universe. Bosons are defined by

21

Vol 7, 2012

integers: They are elementary particles that have a particle spin that is equal to an integer (1, 2, 3, etc). They
include (photons, gluons, and helium-4). These particles are what mediate the fundamental forces of physics
under the quantum field theories.
Premise 1: Let a quantum state, a set of mathematical variable {n, l, m, s} that describe a quantum system
represents a universe.
The principal quantum number, n, or electron shell describes the energy of the electron and is always an integer.
In fact, it can be any positive integer.
The angular or azimuthal quantum number, l, describes the orbital angular momentum of each electron and is
always an integer. The set of orbitals associated with a particular value of l are collectively called a subshell.
The magnetic quantum number, m, describes the magnetic moment of an electron in an arbitrary direction, and
is also always an integer.
The spin quantum number, s, describes the spin or direction (clockwise or counter-clockwise) in which an
electron spins. If there are two electrons in any one orbital, they will have opposite spins.

2. The Algorithm for Wavefunction
(Format to generate quantum numbers)
Quantum wavefunction defines equation of motion in the universe expressing all motion in the form of a series
of probability. They give the probability of finding a particle at each position.
Premise 2: Let the coexistent of triplet numbers 1, 2 and 3 represent a wave function.
Symbolic Representation
Given that in scale A and B;
Variables A and G:
A implies Arithmetic growth mechanism +A.
G implies Geometric growth mechanism × G.
y implies Index number .i.e. a set of all numbers on the number line.
z implies pair of Spin.
To generate a spin (conjugate equal and opposite value):
Formula for the variables
A=y–1
G=A/2+1
Scale A
1 ×G minus 1 + A = +z -z
2 ×G minus 2 + A = 0 0
3 ×G minus 3 + A = -z +z
Conversely,
Scale B
1 + A minus 1 ×G = -z +z
2 + A minus 2 ×G = 0 0
3 + A minus 3 ×G = +z -z

22

Vol 7, 2012

3. Combinations of Quantum Numbers
Using the algorithm
Formula for the variables:
A=y–1
G=A/2+1
When y = -1 and n = 1
1 × 0 – 1 + (-2) 0 – (-1) = +1
2 × 0 – 2 + (-2) 0–0=0
3 × 0 – 3 + (-2) 0 – 1 = -1
When y = 0 and n = 2
1 × 0.5 – 1 + (-1) 0.5 – 0 = +0.5
2 × 0.5 – 2 + (-1) 1–1=0
3 × 0.5 – 3 + (-1) 1.5 – 2 = -0.5
1 ×1 – 1 + 0 1–1=0
2 ×1 – 2 + 0 2–2=0
3 ×1 – 3 + 0 3–3=0
1 × 1.5 – 1 + 1 1.5 – 2 = -0.5
2 × 1.5 – 2 + 1 3–3=0
3 × 1.5 – 3 + 1 4.5 – 4 = +0.5
1 ×2 – 1 + 2 2 – 3 = -1
2 ×2 – 2 + 2 4–4=0
3 ×2 – 3 + 2 6 – 5 = +1

Note: The 3 consecutive coloured numbers in this text represents the last-two subshell for each shell and this
applies to figures (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7).

4. Quantum Numbers
The -1 as shown in (Fig.1) is based on the math that describes it though it does not necessarily need to be there.

23

Vol 7, 2012

l, subshell (angular quantum number)

y, indexes

n, shell or principal quantum number

s, spin quantum number

(Fig.1) For (n - 1) .e.g. If n = 4, l can be 0, 1, 2, and 3 where n is some integer ranges across all integer values

5. Subshell Name


y, indexes



(Fig.2) The subshell name for example Phosphorus having the atomic number of 15 is 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p3
6. Magnetic Quantum Number m
"m" can be any integer between -l and +l.
For 1s, m = 0. For 2s, m = 0. For 2p, m = -1, 0, 1. For 3s, m = 0. For 3p, m = -1, 0, 1. For 3d, m = -2, -1, 0, 1, 2.
For 4s, m = 0. For 4p, m = -1, 0, 1. For 4d, m = -2, -1, 0, 1, 2. For 4f, m = -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3.etc

24

Vol 7, 2012

7. Number of Electrons


y, indexes


s, spin quantum number number

(Fig.3) An atom’s nth electron shell can accommodate 2n2 electrons

8. Quantum Entanglement
Given that in scale A and B;
A implies Arithmetic growth mechanism +A.
G implies Geometric growth mechanism × G.
y implies Index number .i.e. a set of all numbers on the number line.
A = y – 1 and G = A / 2 + 1
Scale A: (SPIN UP) about the x-axis;
When y = -1 When y = 3
(1 × 0) - (1 + (-2)) = +1 (1 × 2) - (1 + 2) = -1
(2 × 0) - (2 + (-2)) = 0 LEFT SIDE (2 ×2) - (2 + 2) = 0 RIGHT SIDE
(3 × 0) - (3 + (-2)) = -1 (3 × 2) - (3 + 2) = +1
Negative infinity α Positive infinity α
Conversely, thus the converse of scale A also exists as scale B and vise versa.
Scale B: (SPIN DOWN) about the y-axis;
When y = -1 When y = 3
(1 + (-2)) - (1 × 0) = -1 (1 + 2) - (1 × 2) = +1
(2 + (-2)) - (2 × 0) = 0 LEFT SIDE (2 + 2) - (2 × 2) = 0 RIGHT SIDE
(3 + (-2)) - (3 × 0) = +1 (3 + 2) - (3 × 2) = -1
Negative infinity α Positive infinity α
NOTE: Without turning scale A to scale B or vise versa each of the scale pretends to turn to the other.
Conclusion
Since both scales A and B has the same variable. Therefore any changes in one would instantaneously reflect in
the other and the other would immediately fix its results to the opposite value. This abstractly describes
quantum entanglement.
Choice mechanism
Since both scales are right, a computer can be used to choose between scale A and scale B. If it chooses one
path even though is random that means it has a choice mechanism otherwise it wouldn’t have chosen any one

25

Vol 7, 2012

either.
Superpositioning
There can be superposition of the two states (scale A and scale B) just like decayed –no decayed in radio active
atoms. This kind of super correlation is entanglement.

9. Shifting of Quantum Numbers
(This can be mapped with expanding universe and universes)
Assertion
Our new hypothesis predicts that if the universe as cool enough it reaches a certain limit and there is another
big bang for another big bang such that the universe expands forever and would not eventually become too cold
to sustain life.
Let consider an input x where x implies a system to shift all quantum numbers or system which all the spin (+
and - values ‘z’) belongs.
What its postulates
It postulates that for every given input x, there exist a turning point at y = x i.e. the point at which a very
significant change occurs; a decisive moment designated as {0, 0, 0} in figures (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7).

NOTE: the plus and minus value below represents the spin of identical particles e.g.
Fermions- elementary particles that have a particle spin equal to a half-integer value
(-1/2, 1/2, 3/2. etc) and it’s the same with half integer value (-0.5, 0.5, 1.5, etc).
Bosons- elementary particles that have a particle spin that is equal to an integer value
(1, 2, 3. etc)

When input x = 1, output is:
(y): Spin (+/-value):
-1........1.0, 0.0, -1.0
0.........0.5, 0.0, -0.5
1..........0.0, 0.0, 0.0
2.........-0.5, 0.0, 0.5
3.........-1.0, 0.0, 1.0
Thus when input x = 1 combination of quantum numbers are:

26

Vol 7, 2012


y, indexes



(Fig.4) Input x = 1 to give combination of quantum numbers

(y): Spin (value):
-1.....1.5, 0.0, -1.5
0......1.0, 0.0, -1.0
1......0.5, 0.0, -0.5
2.......0.0, 0.0, 0.0
3......-0.5, 0.0, 0.5


y, indexes



(y): Spin (value):
-1.....2.0, 0.0, -2.0

27

Vol 7, 2012

0......1.5, 0.0, -1.5
1......1.0, 0.0, -1.0
2.......0.5, 0.0, -0.5
3.......0.0, 0.0, 0.0


y, indexes




Observation
Quantum numbers shift via a continual increase in the number of discrete units that they contained as their spin
continue to expand in figures (4, 5 and 6) towards a positive infinity.
Since the basic building blocks of the universe and all of the known matter in the universe is made up of
fundamental particles having all quantum numbers. Therefore, let all quantum numbers represents an
expanding universe.
Inference
There is Homogeneity In figures (4, 5 and 6), the same observational evidence is available to observers at
different locations for every given input x having a uniform structure throughout and this can also be mapped
with an expanding universe and universes.
Conclusion
This support the evidence that the universe is homogenous even as it expands. Therefore, the universe or
universes expand(s) via a continual increase in the number of discrete units that it contained.
10. Test Validity
(To show that + and - value is referencing the coexistence of 1 and 3)
If a decimal number (excluding consecutive half of any integer) is input once and only once via floating point
numbers the two opposite plus and minus values would be different but would not if an integer or consecutive
half of an integer is input.

28

Vol 7, 2012

For example through a command prompt (where zero is a constant result for every input x):
If input = 2. Then at index number y = -13 (.i.e. a number on the number line)
The two opposite results would be: +7.5 and -7.5
If input = 3.5. Then at index number y = 8 (.i.e. a number on the number line)
If input = 0.1 Then at index number y = 1 (.i.e. a number on the number line)
Difference: 2.220446049250313E-16
If input = 4.7 Then at index number y = 13 (.i.e. a number on the number line)
Difference: -1.7763568394002505E-15

Observation
The plus and minus values does not come from the same entity because of their differences.
Inference
What is done to achieve one value is not the opposite of what is done to achieve the other value.
Conclusion
The difference in the plus and minus values is as a result of the difference in the coexistence of number 1 and 3
from the wavefunction (triplet numbers 1, 2 and 3). Thus, the test is valid otherwise the result would have been
the same for every given input x.

11. Numbers Evolving from Non-Existent Illusion
(Condition that satisfy principal quantum number n)
Given that n ≥ 1 exists or can be considered as a reality region.
Such that n = 1 at the ground state where y = -1 from the algorithm based on the math that describe it. Note: n
and y are conjugate according to the algorithm e.g. If n = 0, l can be -2, and -1 where y is the same as the l = -2.
For n ≠ 0 according to quantum mechanics, n, describes the energy of the electron and is always a positive
integer.
Therefore, n ≤ 0 and l ≤ -1 does not exist or can be considered as a non-existent illusion region. So that n = 0
where y = -2 is a hypothetical point in space, the point of the big bang. This can lead to a mechanism that
would return the information down black holes .i.e. numbers evolving from a non-existent illusion.
When input x = -2, output is:
(y): Spin (+/-value):
-3…..-0.5, 0.0, 0.5 Non-existent illusion region -α
-2…...0.0, 0.0, 0.0 HERE IS THE TURNING POINT THE POINT OF THE BIG BANG.
-1.......0.5, 0.0, -0.5
0........1.0, 0.0, -1.0 Reality region +α
2........1.5, 0.0, -1.5
3........2.0, 0.0, -2.0

29

Vol 7, 2012

Thus, when input x = -2 combination of quantum numbers are:


y, indexes



(Fig.7) Input x = -2 to give combination

What logic demands
Logic demands that since numbers are usually run from a negative infinity to a positive infinity on the number
line. Therefore, numbers can evolve from a non-existent illusion as shown in figures (4, 5, 6 and 7) and this can
be mapped with the universe that evolves from nothing.
Conclusion
If assumed an arithmetic growth mechanism (+A) and a geometric growth mechanism (× numbers can G)
evolve from nothing i.e. numbers evolving from a non-existent illusion.
PROPOSED MODEL FOR THE GLOBAL GEOMETRY OF THE UNIVERSE
12. Conic section analysis of the hyperbolic appearance of circles
In general, this is a graph of when input x is a positive number after the turning point i.e. after the after the big
bang.

When input x = 1.

30

Vol 7, 2012

(Fig.8) The graph shows that shape of the universe is a cone

The graph of when input (x) = …-2, -1, 0, 1, 2… where {-1, 0, +1} are conjugate at the ground state according
the math that describe it.

(Fig.9) The graph shows that the universe could be made up of hexagram
The graph of when input (x) = …-3,-2, -1, 0, 1, 2, -3…

32

Vol 7, 2012

(Fig.10) A continual increase as the graph moves up

13. Reference
Quantum number, Electron shell (subshell name), Electron configuration- Wikipedia.

33

This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science,
Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access
Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is
Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.

More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage:
http://www.iiste.org

The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and
collaborating with academic institutions around the world. Prospective authors of
IISTE journals can find the submission instruction on the following page:
http://www.iiste.org/Journals/

The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified
submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the
readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than
those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the
journals is also available upon request of readers and authors.

IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners

EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open
Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar

Artificial intelligence ai choice mechanism hypothesis of a mathematical method

More Related Content

What's hot (14)

Viewers also liked (7)

Similar to Artificial intelligence ai choice mechanism hypothesis of a mathematical method (20)

More from Alexander Decker (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Artificial intelligence ai choice mechanism hypothesis of a mathematical method