Assessment of Learning 2
TONGUE TWISTER
Assessment of Learning 2
• There is no single way of reporting
the level of achievement of the
students
• Different schools utilize different
symbols to describe and report the
level of performance of their students
• These can be numbers, percentages,
letter grade equivalents and
descriptions
The succeeding table presents an
example of reporting grades for
tertiary level.
Percentages Numbers Letters Descriptions
98 – 100 1.00 A+ Outstanding/Excellent
95 – 97 1.25 A Outstanding/Excellent
92 – 94 1.50 A- Very good
89 – 91 1.75 B+ Very good
86 – 88 2.00 B Good
83 – 85 2.25 B- Good
80 – 82 2.50 C+ Fair
77 – 79 2.75 C+ Fair
75 – 76 3.00 C- Passed
Below 75 5.00 D Failed
Assessment of Learning 2
• In case of basic education, the grading system
being used is based on DepEd order number 33,
series 2004, replacing the DECS order NO.70,
series 1998. the new grading system of DepEd is
about giving grades that are mainly based on
the students’ performance. The features of the
new grading system are the following:
1. The lowest grade or the minimum
performance standard for the students in
public elementary and secondary schools is set
at 75%. The lowest falling grade that may
appear in the report card is set at 65%.
2. The same standard shall apply to students in
the bridge program.
3. In assessing the learning outcomes, the
construction of test items consist of basic
terms(factual information ) 60%, moderately
difficult or more advanced questions 30%, and
higher order thinking skills (items for
distinguishing honor students 10%. Questions in
each category should have different weights.
Test and non – test items should cover only
materials actually taken up in the class.
4. Grading system by subject shall follow the
guidelines in enclosure 1 and enclosure 2 of
DepEd order 33, series 2004.
5. Transmutation tables shall not be used in the
computation grades. Test scores shall be
recorded as raw scores, totaled at the end of
each grading period, and then computed as
percentage [(student’s score ÷ highest
possible) x 100%]. This is also known as the
Table of Equivalence
6. The final grade shall be determined by
averaging the marks for the four quarters. In
the case of secondary level, averaging across
quarters shall be by subject only.
7. Promotion at the secondary level shall be by
subject.
Assessment of Learning 2
Assessment of Learning 2

More Related Content

PPT
authentic vs. traditional assessment
PPTX
The outcomes assessment phases in the instructional cycle
PPTX
Assessment
PPTX
Basic concepts in assessing student learning
PDF
12 Principles of High Quality Assessments (RE-UPLOADED)
DOCX
Semi-detailed lesson plan
PPTX
Norm reference grading system.ppt
PPTX
authentic vs. traditional assessment
The outcomes assessment phases in the instructional cycle
Assessment
Basic concepts in assessing student learning
12 Principles of High Quality Assessments (RE-UPLOADED)
Semi-detailed lesson plan
Norm reference grading system.ppt

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Assessment of learning 1
PPTX
Preparing The Table of Specification
PPT
Classroom assessment for the k to 12 (BEC)
PPT
Curriculum
PPT
Grading and Reporting
PPTX
Facilitating Learning Module 4
PPTX
preparing a TOS
PPTX
Ed8 Assessment of Learning 2
PPTX
Table of specifications
PPTX
Performance assessment
PPTX
Portfolio Assessment
PPTX
7 Types of Curriculum Operating in Schools
PPTX
Shift to educational focus from content to learning outcome
PPTX
Constructing test Items
PDF
Assessing student learning outcomes
PPTX
Function of Grading and Reporting System
PPTX
Philosophy of education
PPTX
Rubrics (Analytic and Holistic)
PPSX
Brain-Based Education
PPTX
Pedagogical Approaches
Assessment of learning 1
Preparing The Table of Specification
Classroom assessment for the k to 12 (BEC)
Curriculum
Grading and Reporting
Facilitating Learning Module 4
preparing a TOS
Ed8 Assessment of Learning 2
Table of specifications
Performance assessment
Portfolio Assessment
7 Types of Curriculum Operating in Schools
Shift to educational focus from content to learning outcome
Constructing test Items
Assessing student learning outcomes
Function of Grading and Reporting System
Philosophy of education
Rubrics (Analytic and Holistic)
Brain-Based Education
Pedagogical Approaches
Ad

Viewers also liked (6)

PPTX
Introduction to developmental biology
PPT
Biology: First lecture for Cell and Developmental Biology #bs1003 bs1003 Leic...
PPTX
Human developmental Biology
 
PPT
Assessment of Learning
PPTX
Assessment of learning2
PPT
Assessment Of Student Learning
Introduction to developmental biology
Biology: First lecture for Cell and Developmental Biology #bs1003 bs1003 Leic...
Human developmental Biology
 
Assessment of Learning
Assessment of learning2
Assessment Of Student Learning
Ad

Similar to Assessment of Learning 2 (20)

PPTX
GRADING-AND-REPORTING-SYSTEMS REPORT.pptx
PPTX
Utilization & Reporting Test Results
PPTX
Grading and reporting By: leo domondon
PPTX
Sample Curriculum Design for Elem. Grade 1 English
PPTX
Seminar presentation
DOCX
Two-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling System
PPT
Assessment matrix elem
PPTX
Interpretation of scores and the grading system in public schools
PPTX
Utilization of Assessment Data_ Grading (1).pptx
PPTX
Curriculum development in the philippines
PPT
depedwithnaruto
PPTX
Grading-System (Norm and Criterion).pptx
PPTX
Grading-Computations_roda.pptxcvhvjhdcvhj
PPT
Evaluation vi viii
PPTX
Chap 15
PPT
20101004 principalsconference
PPT
20101004 principalsconference
PPTX
Presentation2.pptx
PPTX
Presentation (4)
PPTX
Assessment Strategies Consistent with Curriculum Requirements..pptx
GRADING-AND-REPORTING-SYSTEMS REPORT.pptx
Utilization & Reporting Test Results
Grading and reporting By: leo domondon
Sample Curriculum Design for Elem. Grade 1 English
Seminar presentation
Two-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling System
Assessment matrix elem
Interpretation of scores and the grading system in public schools
Utilization of Assessment Data_ Grading (1).pptx
Curriculum development in the philippines
depedwithnaruto
Grading-System (Norm and Criterion).pptx
Grading-Computations_roda.pptxcvhvjhdcvhj
Evaluation vi viii
Chap 15
20101004 principalsconference
20101004 principalsconference
Presentation2.pptx
Presentation (4)
Assessment Strategies Consistent with Curriculum Requirements..pptx

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Race Reva University – Shaping Future Leaders in Artificial Intelligence
PDF
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
PDF
semiconductor packaging in vlsi design fab
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PPTX
Core Concepts of Personalized Learning and Virtual Learning Environments
PDF
IP : I ; Unit I : Preformulation Studies
PDF
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 2).pdf
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PPTX
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PDF
Literature_Review_methods_ BRACU_MKT426 course material
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PDF
English Textual Question & Ans (12th Class).pdf
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PPTX
Education and Perspectives of Education.pptx
PDF
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
PPTX
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
PDF
Climate and Adaptation MCQs class 7 from chatgpt
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
Race Reva University – Shaping Future Leaders in Artificial Intelligence
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
semiconductor packaging in vlsi design fab
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
Core Concepts of Personalized Learning and Virtual Learning Environments
IP : I ; Unit I : Preformulation Studies
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 2).pdf
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
Literature_Review_methods_ BRACU_MKT426 course material
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
English Textual Question & Ans (12th Class).pdf
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
Education and Perspectives of Education.pptx
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
Climate and Adaptation MCQs class 7 from chatgpt
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide

Assessment of Learning 2

  • 4. • There is no single way of reporting the level of achievement of the students • Different schools utilize different symbols to describe and report the level of performance of their students • These can be numbers, percentages, letter grade equivalents and descriptions
  • 5. The succeeding table presents an example of reporting grades for tertiary level. Percentages Numbers Letters Descriptions 98 – 100 1.00 A+ Outstanding/Excellent 95 – 97 1.25 A Outstanding/Excellent 92 – 94 1.50 A- Very good 89 – 91 1.75 B+ Very good 86 – 88 2.00 B Good 83 – 85 2.25 B- Good 80 – 82 2.50 C+ Fair 77 – 79 2.75 C+ Fair 75 – 76 3.00 C- Passed Below 75 5.00 D Failed
  • 7. • In case of basic education, the grading system being used is based on DepEd order number 33, series 2004, replacing the DECS order NO.70, series 1998. the new grading system of DepEd is about giving grades that are mainly based on the students’ performance. The features of the new grading system are the following: 1. The lowest grade or the minimum performance standard for the students in public elementary and secondary schools is set at 75%. The lowest falling grade that may appear in the report card is set at 65%.
  • 8. 2. The same standard shall apply to students in the bridge program. 3. In assessing the learning outcomes, the construction of test items consist of basic terms(factual information ) 60%, moderately difficult or more advanced questions 30%, and higher order thinking skills (items for distinguishing honor students 10%. Questions in each category should have different weights. Test and non – test items should cover only materials actually taken up in the class.
  • 9. 4. Grading system by subject shall follow the guidelines in enclosure 1 and enclosure 2 of DepEd order 33, series 2004. 5. Transmutation tables shall not be used in the computation grades. Test scores shall be recorded as raw scores, totaled at the end of each grading period, and then computed as percentage [(student’s score ÷ highest possible) x 100%]. This is also known as the Table of Equivalence
  • 10. 6. The final grade shall be determined by averaging the marks for the four quarters. In the case of secondary level, averaging across quarters shall be by subject only. 7. Promotion at the secondary level shall be by subject.