My Students’ Learning
    Styles versus My Teaching
    Style: A Study for Having a
       Better Teaching and
         Learning Process
               Assignment 1 HMLT 5203
                     Budi Poniam


1 Budi Poniam. February 2013
Introduction
     Much research supports the view that when
     students’ learning preferences match their
     instructor’s teaching styles, student motivation
     and achievement usually improve. (Brown,
     Bettina L. (2003). Teaching style vs. learning
     style. Myths and Realities (no. 26). Educational
     Resources Information Center.)

     A study of my students’ learning styles and my
     teaching style is conducted to have a better
     teaching and learning process in my courses;
     more effective and joyfull.
                                        Budi Poniam.   February
2
                                                          2013
Data Collection
 13 students (Higher Education) participated in the
    Don Clark’s Learning Style Survey
    (http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/styles.html),
    but only 12 completed the survey.

 Instructor (my self) was the subject of Teaching Style
    Inventory survey.
    http://www.texascollaborative.org/tools/TSI.pdf.




                                          Budi Poniam.   February
3
                                                            2013
Data Analysis

          A                                     B




                          Purple Area




          D                                     C



4       Diagram 1. Learning Styles of My studentsPoniam.
                                              Budi         February
                                                              2013
Data Analysis (Diagram 1)
    




                             Budi Poniam.   February
5
                                               2013
Data Analysis (Diagram 1)

      35.0
      30.0
      25.0                                          Purple Area
      20.0                                          Quadran A
      15.0                                          Quadran B
                                                    Quadran C
      10.0
       5.0
       0.0
               Distribution of Students (%)

         Chart 1. Distribution of Students (in %)
                                                Budi Poniam.   February
6
                                                                  2013
Data Analysis (Chart 1)
     2 major groups of students (Quadran A and C)
      in the class that have very different learning
      styles.
     Students in Quadran A (Doing and Feeling) are
      in the organizing category.
     Students in Quadran C (Watching and
      Thinking) are in the philosophy category.




                                        Budi Poniam.   February
7
                                                          2013
The Organizing Category
    In this category students prefer Doing and Feeling:

      Good at adapting to changing circumstances
        and solves problems in an intuitive, trial-and-
        error manner, such as discovery learning.
      Tend to be at ease with people.
      Prefer the challenges of new
        experiences, involvement with
        others, assimilation, and role-playing.
      Like anything new, problem solving, and small
        group discussions.

                                            Budi Poniam.   February
8
                                                              2013
The Philosophy Category
    In this category students prefer Watching and
    Thinking:

      Prefer to pull a number of different
       observations and thoughts into an integrated
       whole in a step-by-step manner (go from
       details to big-picture).
      Prefer to reason logically and design
       models, theories, and projects.
      Like lectures, analogies, systems, and case
       studies.
      Talking with experts is normally not helpful


                                         Budi Poniam.   February
9
                                                           2013
Data Analysis


                                                  (6,3)




          Diagram 2. Matrix of My Teaching Goals
                                          Budi Poniam.    February
10
                                                             2013
Data Analysis (Diagram 2)
     




                              Budi Poniam.   February
11
                                                2013
Data Analysis




                                                    (11,-2)




         Diagram 3. Matrix of My Teaching Methods
                                          Budi Poniam.   February
12
                                                            2013
Data Analysis (Diagram 3)
     




                              Budi Poniam.   February
13
                                                2013
Data Analysis
 My Students’ Learning Styles Versus My Teaching Styles


 Teaching                        Students’ Learning Styles
  Styles            The Organizing Category       The Philosophy Category

      Teaching   Instructor is expected to give
       Goals     more challenges of new           Students get most
       Matrix    experiences, discovery           benefits from this
     Quadran D   learning; not just familiar      teaching goals.
        (6,3)    applications of the concepts.

                                                  Students get most
                 Students get most benefits
      Teaching                                    benefits from theoretical
                 from group works.
      Methods                                     and symbolic cognitive
                 Instructor is expected to
       Matrix                                     processing.
                 design interactive activities
     Quadran B                                    Instructor is expected to
                 such as role play, hands-on
       (11,-2)                                    accomodate students’
                 activities.
                                                  need for individual tasks.
                                                        Budi Poniam.   February
14
                                                                          2013
Conclusion
        There are 2 major groups of students that have
         different learning styles therefore instructor has
         to design differentiated instructions that can
         accomodate the needs of most students in their
         learning process.

        More challenges of new experiences must be
         added to more familiar applications of the
         concepts.

        Individual and group tasks must be balanced.

                                               Budi Poniam.   February
15
                                                                 2013
Reflection
      In doing the Teaching Style Inventory (TSI)
       survey, instructor (my self) was reminded several
       instructional practices that were not conducted any
       more in my class such as giving individual task to
       my students. I have to reconsider some pratices in
       my future instruction.
      I need to know my students’ learning styles (by
       doing a survey at the beginning of the course) so I
       can adjust the instruction design and process to
       accomodate their needs, therefore making the
       learning process effective and joyful.
      Some surveys should be conducted and studied
       before I decide to choose the appropriate surveys of
       learning styles and also teaching styles.
                                             Budi Poniam.   February
16
                                                               2013
References
     1.   Learning Style Survey.
          http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/styles/learn_style_
          survey.html. Downloaded at 15 February 2013.
     2.   Teaching Style Inventory.
          http://www.texascollaborative.org/tools/TSI.pdf.
          Downloaded at 15 February 2013.
     3.   Brown, Bettina L. (2003). Teaching style vs. learning style.
          Myths and Realities (no. 26). Educational Resources
          Information Center.




                                                     Budi Poniam.   February
17
                                                                       2013

More Related Content

PDF
Research abstract volume_2
PPT
Problem solving
DOC
James little actionresearchplan
PPTX
Using Project-Based Learning and Standards-Based Education
DOC
Form a
PDF
Teaching Mathematics through Integrated Brain Gym in Pair Checks of Cooperati...
PPTX
Self-determination-theory-
Research abstract volume_2
Problem solving
James little actionresearchplan
Using Project-Based Learning and Standards-Based Education
Form a
Teaching Mathematics through Integrated Brain Gym in Pair Checks of Cooperati...
Self-determination-theory-

What's hot (12)

PPTX
LOS ALUMNOS DACTILARES
DOCX
Atividades de Geografia para alunos portadores de necessidades especiais do 8...
DOC
Dr. Rshan Lal Dahiya
DOC
Let Us Make the Difference in Our Numeracy Classrooms: Advanced Certifcate in...
PDF
MATH I CURRICULUM GUIDE (SEC)
PPTX
Levels of teaching
PDF
Fink Designing Courses 2004
DOC
Final impact teacher student motivation
PDF
First Grade Unit 1
PPTX
Concept of teaching
PPSX
Educ. 4 principles of teaching mara ico report
PDF
Innovative Teaching in Educational Psychology
LOS ALUMNOS DACTILARES
Atividades de Geografia para alunos portadores de necessidades especiais do 8...
Dr. Rshan Lal Dahiya
Let Us Make the Difference in Our Numeracy Classrooms: Advanced Certifcate in...
MATH I CURRICULUM GUIDE (SEC)
Levels of teaching
Fink Designing Courses 2004
Final impact teacher student motivation
First Grade Unit 1
Concept of teaching
Educ. 4 principles of teaching mara ico report
Innovative Teaching in Educational Psychology
Ad

Viewers also liked (7)

PDF
Reliability based approach for structural design and assessment performance c...
PPT
Professional Teaching Portfolio
PPTX
Field Study 6: Episode 1
PDF
FS6 Episode 3: The Teacher in a School Setting
PDF
FS6 Episode 5: The Global Teacher
PDF
FS6 Episode 1: On Becoming a Teacher
PDF
FS6 Episode 2: The Teacher's Philosophy of Education
Reliability based approach for structural design and assessment performance c...
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Field Study 6: Episode 1
FS6 Episode 3: The Teacher in a School Setting
FS6 Episode 5: The Global Teacher
FS6 Episode 1: On Becoming a Teacher
FS6 Episode 2: The Teacher's Philosophy of Education
Ad

Similar to Assignment 1 hmlt 5203 budi poniam (20)

DOCX
Tugasan 4 penilaian kendiri teks
PPT
Chapter 5 The Addie Model
PPTX
Week 1 lecture data in our classrooms
PDF
Effective online teaching and student engagement
PPT
Group 4 Program Demonstration Apr. 21, 2013
PPTX
PPTX
Differentiated learning 2
PPTX
Kenan Dikilitas "Developing ways of analyzing data"
PPTX
Summative Evaluation
DOC
Mixed Ability Class Chart
PPTX
Standard i
PDF
Course Organization for Blackboard 9.1
PDF
Differentiation intro
PDF
Teachingnotes pechakucha
DOC
Mixed Aiblity Class Chart
DOC
Mixed Ability Class Chart
PPTX
Crash course in instruction
PPTX
Meda 5700_Ch1
PPTX
TEACHING strategies for traditional madrasah asatidz under madrasah educatio...
PPT
Dallas Dunlop Reflective Pedagogy Presentation
Tugasan 4 penilaian kendiri teks
Chapter 5 The Addie Model
Week 1 lecture data in our classrooms
Effective online teaching and student engagement
Group 4 Program Demonstration Apr. 21, 2013
Differentiated learning 2
Kenan Dikilitas "Developing ways of analyzing data"
Summative Evaluation
Mixed Ability Class Chart
Standard i
Course Organization for Blackboard 9.1
Differentiation intro
Teachingnotes pechakucha
Mixed Aiblity Class Chart
Mixed Ability Class Chart
Crash course in instruction
Meda 5700_Ch1
TEACHING strategies for traditional madrasah asatidz under madrasah educatio...
Dallas Dunlop Reflective Pedagogy Presentation

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
DOCX
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx
PPTX
Module on health assessment of CHN. pptx
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART - (2) THE PURPOSE OF LIFE.pdf
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
PDF
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 2).pdf
PPTX
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
PDF
English Textual Question & Ans (12th Class).pdf
PDF
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PPTX
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
PDF
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PDF
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PDF
MICROENCAPSULATION_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI .pdf
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx
Module on health assessment of CHN. pptx
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART - (2) THE PURPOSE OF LIFE.pdf
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 2).pdf
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
English Textual Question & Ans (12th Class).pdf
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
MICROENCAPSULATION_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI .pdf

Assignment 1 hmlt 5203 budi poniam

  • 1. My Students’ Learning Styles versus My Teaching Style: A Study for Having a Better Teaching and Learning Process Assignment 1 HMLT 5203 Budi Poniam 1 Budi Poniam. February 2013
  • 2. Introduction  Much research supports the view that when students’ learning preferences match their instructor’s teaching styles, student motivation and achievement usually improve. (Brown, Bettina L. (2003). Teaching style vs. learning style. Myths and Realities (no. 26). Educational Resources Information Center.)  A study of my students’ learning styles and my teaching style is conducted to have a better teaching and learning process in my courses; more effective and joyfull. Budi Poniam. February 2 2013
  • 3. Data Collection  13 students (Higher Education) participated in the Don Clark’s Learning Style Survey (http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/styles.html), but only 12 completed the survey.  Instructor (my self) was the subject of Teaching Style Inventory survey. http://www.texascollaborative.org/tools/TSI.pdf. Budi Poniam. February 3 2013
  • 4. Data Analysis A B Purple Area D C 4 Diagram 1. Learning Styles of My studentsPoniam. Budi February 2013
  • 5. Data Analysis (Diagram 1)  Budi Poniam. February 5 2013
  • 6. Data Analysis (Diagram 1) 35.0 30.0 25.0 Purple Area 20.0 Quadran A 15.0 Quadran B Quadran C 10.0 5.0 0.0 Distribution of Students (%) Chart 1. Distribution of Students (in %) Budi Poniam. February 6 2013
  • 7. Data Analysis (Chart 1)  2 major groups of students (Quadran A and C) in the class that have very different learning styles.  Students in Quadran A (Doing and Feeling) are in the organizing category.  Students in Quadran C (Watching and Thinking) are in the philosophy category. Budi Poniam. February 7 2013
  • 8. The Organizing Category In this category students prefer Doing and Feeling:  Good at adapting to changing circumstances and solves problems in an intuitive, trial-and- error manner, such as discovery learning.  Tend to be at ease with people.  Prefer the challenges of new experiences, involvement with others, assimilation, and role-playing.  Like anything new, problem solving, and small group discussions. Budi Poniam. February 8 2013
  • 9. The Philosophy Category In this category students prefer Watching and Thinking:  Prefer to pull a number of different observations and thoughts into an integrated whole in a step-by-step manner (go from details to big-picture).  Prefer to reason logically and design models, theories, and projects.  Like lectures, analogies, systems, and case studies.  Talking with experts is normally not helpful Budi Poniam. February 9 2013
  • 10. Data Analysis (6,3) Diagram 2. Matrix of My Teaching Goals Budi Poniam. February 10 2013
  • 11. Data Analysis (Diagram 2)  Budi Poniam. February 11 2013
  • 12. Data Analysis (11,-2) Diagram 3. Matrix of My Teaching Methods Budi Poniam. February 12 2013
  • 13. Data Analysis (Diagram 3)  Budi Poniam. February 13 2013
  • 14. Data Analysis My Students’ Learning Styles Versus My Teaching Styles Teaching Students’ Learning Styles Styles The Organizing Category The Philosophy Category Teaching Instructor is expected to give Goals more challenges of new Students get most Matrix experiences, discovery benefits from this Quadran D learning; not just familiar teaching goals. (6,3) applications of the concepts. Students get most Students get most benefits Teaching benefits from theoretical from group works. Methods and symbolic cognitive Instructor is expected to Matrix processing. design interactive activities Quadran B Instructor is expected to such as role play, hands-on (11,-2) accomodate students’ activities. need for individual tasks. Budi Poniam. February 14 2013
  • 15. Conclusion  There are 2 major groups of students that have different learning styles therefore instructor has to design differentiated instructions that can accomodate the needs of most students in their learning process.  More challenges of new experiences must be added to more familiar applications of the concepts.  Individual and group tasks must be balanced. Budi Poniam. February 15 2013
  • 16. Reflection  In doing the Teaching Style Inventory (TSI) survey, instructor (my self) was reminded several instructional practices that were not conducted any more in my class such as giving individual task to my students. I have to reconsider some pratices in my future instruction.  I need to know my students’ learning styles (by doing a survey at the beginning of the course) so I can adjust the instruction design and process to accomodate their needs, therefore making the learning process effective and joyful.  Some surveys should be conducted and studied before I decide to choose the appropriate surveys of learning styles and also teaching styles. Budi Poniam. February 16 2013
  • 17. References 1. Learning Style Survey. http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/styles/learn_style_ survey.html. Downloaded at 15 February 2013. 2. Teaching Style Inventory. http://www.texascollaborative.org/tools/TSI.pdf. Downloaded at 15 February 2013. 3. Brown, Bettina L. (2003). Teaching style vs. learning style. Myths and Realities (no. 26). Educational Resources Information Center. Budi Poniam. February 17 2013