Atlas 3 1-atmosphere-screen

72
T
he Earth’s atmosphere is a collec-
tion of gases, vapor, and particu-
lates that together form a blanket
of “air” that surrounds the planet. The
atmosphere extends over 560 km (348
miles) from the surface of the Earth out
toward space, and can be roughly divided
into ﬁve major layers or sections (Figure
3.4). The primary components of the at-
mosphere are three gases: nitrogen (N2, 78
per cent), oxygen (O2, 21 per cent), and
argon (Ar, 1 per cent). Other components,
present in smaller amounts, include water
vapor (H2O, 0-7 per cent), ozone (O3, 0-
0.01 per cent), and carbon dioxide (CO2,
0.01-0.1 per cent) (Phillips 1995).
The Earth’s atmosphere plays many
vital roles essential to sustaining life on
the planet. The air we breathe circulates
through its lowest level. The chemical ele-
ments carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and hy-
drogen, which are constituents of all living
things, are cycled and recycled in the atmo-
sphere. Organisms convert these elements
into carbohydrates, proteins, and other
chemical compounds. The atmosphere
also shields life on the planet’s surface
from harmful solar radiation, and—for the
most part—from the threat of meteorites,
which typically burn up as they go through
the atmosphere (UNEP 1999a).
Human activities impact the Earth’s
atmosphere in many ways. Some activities
produce a quite direct effect, such as gen-
erating and releasing pollutants that foul
the air, and adding carbon dioxide and
other greenhouse gases to the atmosphere
that induce global warming and climate
change. Other human impacts, such as
water pollution, land degradation, and
human-induced loss of biodiversity, can
indirectly affect the atmosphere, as well as
the water and land.
In this section, four major issues that in-
volve human impacts on the atmosphere—
ozone depletion, global warming, climate
change, and air pollution—are addressed.
Ozone Depletion
Ozone is a relatively unstable molecule,
made up of three oxygen atoms (O3). In
the atmosphere, ozone is formed naturally
in the stratosphere. It is concentrated
there as an “ozone layer” that acts as a
protective shield against harmful ultravio-
let (UV) radiation coming from the Sun.
The loss of stratospheric ozone allows
more UV radiation to reach the Earth’s
surface, where it can cause skin cancer and
cataracts in people and negatively affect
other living things as well.
Ozone is also found in the troposphere,
the layer of the Earth’s atmosphere that is
closest to the planet’s surface. Ozone can
3.1 Atmosphere
Figure 3.4: The Earth’s atmosphere Credit: Used with permission from Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Cam-
bridge, UK. Source: http://www.atm.ch.cam.ac.uk/tour/atmosphere.html
Exosphere
Thermosphere
Mesosphere
Stratosphere
Troposphere
300 km
400 km altitude
50 km
40 km
10 km
Credit: Image Analysis Laboratory, NASA Johnson Space Center

73
be formed naturally in the troposphere—
for example, by lightning. However,
tropospheric ozone is also a byproduct of
certain human activities. Vehicle exhaust
contributes large quantities of ozone to the
troposphere each year.
Depending on where ozone resides,
it can protect or harm life on the Earth
(Figure 3.5). In the stratosphere, ozone
is “good” as it shields life on the surface
from harmful solar radiation. In the tropo-
sphere, ozone can be “bad” as it becomes
a type of air pollution. Changes in the
amount of ozone in either the stratosphere
or the troposphere can have serious
consequences for life on the Earth. For
several decades, “bad” tropospheric ozone
has been increasing in the air we breathe,
while “good” stratospheric ozone has been
decreasing, gradually eroding the Earth’s
protective ozone shield (Thompson 1996).
Since the late 1970s, scientists have
detected a slow but steady decline in the
amount of ozone in the stratospheric
ozone layer. This ozone destruction re-
sults from the presence of certain types
of chemicals in the atmosphere, espe-
cially chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and
other chlorine- and bromine-containing
compounds, coupled with fluctuations in
stratospheric temperature.
In polar regions, particularly the area
of the atmosphere that overlies Antarctica,
ozone depletion is so great that an “ozone
hole” forms in the stratosphere there every
Ozone in the Earth’s Atmosphere
Stratosphere:
Troposphere: Earth
Mesosphere
In this region,ozone is
“bad.”It can damage
lung tissure and plants.
In this region,ozone
is “good.”It protects
us from the sun’s
harmful ultraviolet
radiation.
Figure 3.5: Ozone in the stratosphere forms the protective ozone layer that shields the Earth’s sur-
face from harmful solar radiation. Ozone in the troposphere, the lowest part of the atmosphere,
can be a form of air pollution. Source: http://www.atmos.umd.edu/~owen/CHPI/IMAGES/ozonefig1.html
Credit: Image Analysis Laboratory, NASA Johnson Space Center

74
austral spring (late August through early
October). In the past few years, the Ant-
arctic ozone hole has been about the size
of North America. In 2000, the Antarctic
ozone hole was the largest on record,
covering 29.6 million km2 (11.4 million
square miles). In the austral spring of
2003, it was almost as large, covering 28.9
million km2 (11.1 million square miles)
(Figure 3.6).
Seasonal ozone depletion is also
noticeable around the North Pole. More
than 60 per cent of stratospheric ozone
north of the Arctic
Circle was
lost during the winter and early spring of
1999-2000 (Shah 2002).
Some ozone-depleting chemicals, such
as CFCs, also contribute to global warm-
ing. Like carbon dioxide and methane,
CFCs are powerful greenhouse gases
that trap heat radiating from the Earth’s
surface and prevent it from immediately
escaping into space. This causes the part
of the atmosphere nearest the Earth’s sur-
face to warm, resulting in global warming.
This warming in the troposphere, how-
ever, leads to colder-than-normal tempera-
tures in the stratosphere. This, in turn,
enhances the formation of certain types of
stratospheric clouds that foster ozone-de-
stroying chemical reactions in the strato-
sphere (Shanklin n.d.).
Fortunately, bans against the produc-
tion and use of CFCs and other strato-
spheric ozone-destroying chemicals ap-
pear to be working to reverse the damage
that has been done to the ozone layer. In
the past few years, the Antarctic ozone
hole has not increased signiﬁcantly in size
Figure 3.7: Growth of the Antarctic ozone
hole over 20 years, as observed by the satel-
lite-borne Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer
(TOMS). Darkest blue areas represent regions
of maximum ozone depletion. Atmospheric
ozone concentration is measured in Dobson
Units. A “normal” stratospheric ozone mea-
surement is approximately 300 Dobson Units.
Measurements of 220 Dobson Units and below
represent signiﬁcant ozone depletion. Source:
http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/topstory/2004/0517aura.html
1979
1982
1984
1986
1988
24 Sep 200306 Sep 2000
Ozone • Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS)
Figure 3.6: Every austral spring, an area of severe stratospheric ozone depletion— an “ozone
hole”—forms in the atmosphere over Antarctica. The ozone holes that formed in 2000 and 2003
were the largest and second largest on record, respectively. Source: http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/gsfc/earth/
pictures/2003/0925ozonehole/still_hires_24Sept2003.tif and http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/ftp/pub/ozone/ozone_still_2000_09_06.tif
(NASA 2004a)

75
1990
1992
1994
1997
1999
or intensity. Some researchers predict that
if atmospheric concentrations of ozone-de-
stroying chemicals drop to pre-ozone-hole
levels, the Antarctic ozone hole should dis-
appear in approximately 50 years (Figure
3.7) (WMO-UNEP 2002).
Global Warming
Atmospheric temperature and chemistry
are strongly influenced by the amount
and types of trace gases present in the
atmosphere. Examples of human-made
trace gases are chlorofluorocarbons, such
as CFC-11, CFC-12, and halons. Carbon
dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane (CH4)
are naturally formed trace gases produced
by the burning of fossil fuels,
released by living and
dead biomass,
and resulting from various metabolic
processes of microorganisms in the soil,
wetlands, and oceans. There is increasing
evidence that the percentages of environ-
mentally significant trace gases (green-
house gases) are changing due to both
natural and human factors, and contribut-
ing to global warming.
Global warming is recognized as one of
the greatest environmental threats facing
the world today. Global warming is the
gradual rise of the Earth’s average surface
temperature caused by an enhancing of the
planet’s natural greenhouse effect. Radi-
ant energy leaving the planet is naturally
retained in the atmosphere thanks to the
presence of certain gases such as water
vapor and carbon dioxide. This heat-trap-
ping effect is, in fact, what makes life on the
Earth possible.
Global warming, by contrast, is an
intensification of the Earth’s greenhouse
effect. The Earth’s average surface tem-
perature, which has been relatively stable
for more than 1 000 years, has risen by
about 0.5 degrees Celsius in the past 100
years (Figure 3.8). The nine warmest
years in the 20th century have all occurred
since 1980; the 1990s were probably the
warmest decade of the second millennium
(IPCC 2001).
Global warming has occurred in the dis-
tant past as the result of natural influences.
However, since the industrial era, the term
is most often used to refer to the current
warming predicted as a result of increases
in the atmospheric concentrations of cer-
tain heat-trapping greenhouse gases gener-
ated by human activities (Figure 3.9).
Most scientists
Credit: NOAA Photo Library

76
Figure 3.8: Satellite data of Arctic regions show
warming is taking place there at an accelerat-
ing rate. These two maps show temperature
anomalies in the Arctic in 1981 and in 2003.
The anomalies range from 7ºC (12.6ºF) below
normal to 7ºC (12.6ºF) above normal. Shades
of orange and red show areas of warming;
shades of blue shows areas of cooling; white
represents little or no change (map adapted
from Comiso). The data reveal that some re-
gions are warming faster than 2.5ºC (4.5ºF) per
decade (NASA 2003b).
Source: http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a002800/
a002830/

77
believe that much of this global tempera-
ture increase is due to increased use of
fossil fuels, which when burned, release
carbon dioxide into the atmosphere where
it absorbs infrared radiation that normally
would pass through the atmosphere and
travel out into space (Brehm 2003).
The planet is not as warm as it was ap-
proximately 1 000 years ago (Figure 3.10).
Nevertheless, CO2 currently accounts for
the greatest proportion of greenhouse gas
emissions. Much of the CO2 added to the
atmosphere comes from the burning of
fossil fuels in vehicles, for heating,
and for the production of electricity
(Figure 3.11).
In addition to carbon dioxide, ris-
ing levels of methane in the atmosphere
are also of concern. The relative rate of
increase of methane has greatly exceeded
that of carbon dioxide in the last several
decades. Methane is released into the
atmosphere in many ways: as a result of ag-
riculture and ranching activities; through
the decay of organic matter, including
waste dumps; through deforestation; and
as a by-product of the hydrocarbon econo-
my. None of these sources are anticipated
to decrease in the future. On the contrary,
methane emissions are expected to in-
crease, as each year an additional 100 mil-
lion people require food and fuel as world
population expands (Figure 3.12).
Most scientists believe that recent
global warming is mainly due to human
activities and related increases in concen-
trations of greenhouse gases (Figure 3.13),
primarily CO2, CH4, nitrous oxide (N2O),
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluoro-
carbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride
(SF6). These changes are driven by world-
wide population and economic growth,
and the underlying production and
consumption of fossil fuels, as well as by
the intensification of agricultural activity
and changes in land use and land cover.
Energy production and use, the largest
sole source of CO2 emissions and a large
contributor of CH4 and N2O emissions, ac-
counted for 81.7 per cent of emissions in
industrialised countries in 1998
(UNFCCC 2000).
From far out in space, instruments
carried aboard satellites, such as NASA’s
Figure 3.9: Human activities directly influence the abundance of greenhouse gases and aerosols in
the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, and sulfur aerosols have all increased
significantly in the past 50 years. Source: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC (2001)
Figure 3.10: Variations in the Earth’s temperature for the past 140 years (global) and for the past
1 000 years (Northern Hemisphere). Source: IPCC (2001)

78
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrora-
diometre (MODIS) sensor, are taking the
temperature of the Earth’s surface. Satel-
lite data confirm that the Earth’s average
surface temperature has been slowly rising
for the past few decades (Figure 3.14).
Satellite records are more detailed and
comprehensive than previously available
ground measurements, and are essential
for improving climate analyses and com-
puter modeling.
One of the more predictable effects of
global warming will be a rise in sea levels
(Figure 3.15). It is already under way at
a pace of about a millimetre a year—a
consequence of both melting land ice and
the thermal expansion of the oceans (Har-
rison and Pearce 2001). Predictions as to
how much global sea levels may rise over
the next century range from half a metre
(1.5 feet) (Houghton et al. 2001) to be-
tween 1 and 2 m (3 to 6 feet) (Nicholls et
al. 1999). Such an increase would drown
many coastal areas and atoll islands. Un-
less countries take action to address rising
sea levels, the resulting flooding is ex-
pected to impact some 200 million people
worldwide by the 2080s. In addition,
around 25 per cent of the world’s coastal
wetlands could be lost by this time due to
sea-level rise (DETR 1997).
Global warming may have some posi-
tive impacts. It could, for example, open
Figure 3.13: The role of different gases and aerosols in global warming. Source: IPCC (2001)
Figure 3.14: Global warming is an increase in
the Earth’s average surface temperature. These
graphs illustrate how a shift in the mean temper-
ature and its variance can affect weather. Source:
IPCC (2001)
Figure 3.12: Methane is the second largest contributor to global warming and its atmospheric
concentration has increased significantly over the last two decades. Methane emissions from
human-related activities now represent about 70 per cent of total emissions, as opposed to less
than 10 per cent 200 years ago. Source: IPCC (2001)
Figure 3.11: Between 1971 and 1998, energy use and carbon dioxide emissions both increased
significantly, contributing to the likelihood of global warming. Source: IPCC (2001)

79
new lands for agriculture and forestry in
the far north. During the past 30 years in
Iceland, old farmlands have been exposed,
and are being used, as the Breidamerkur-
jökull Glacier has receded. All told,
however, the negative impacts of un-
checked global warming outweigh any
positive benefits.
Climate Change
Climate is the statistical description in
terms of the mean and variability of rel-
evant measures of the atmosphere-ocean
system over periods of time ranging from
weeks to thousands or millions of years.
Climate change is defined as a statistically
significant variation in either the mean
state of the climate or in its variability,
persisting for an extended period (typically
decades or longer). Climate change may be
due to natural internal processes or to ex-
ternal forcing (Figure 3.16). Volcanic gases
and dust, changes in ocean circulation,
fluctuations in solar output, and increased
concentrations of greenhouse gases in the
Figure 3.15: Reasons for sea level change Source: IPCC (2001)
European Heat Wave, July 2003 Credit: NASA—
Satellite Thermometers Show Earth Has a Fever (2004)
Case Study: European Heat Wave
July 2003
This image shows the differences
in daytime land surface temperatures
(temperature anomalies) collected over
Europe between July 2001 and July 2003
by the Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s
Terra satellite. A blanket of deep red across
southern and eastern France (left of im-
age center) reveals that temperatures in
this region were 10ºC (18ºF) hotter dur-
ing 2003 than in 2001. Temperatures were
similar in white areas and cooler in blue
areas. Although models predict an overall
increase in global average temperatures,
regional differences may be pronounced,
and some areas, such as mid-continental
zones in North America and Asia, may
actualy experience some degree of cooling
(NASA 2003c).
79

80
atmosphere can all cause climate changes
(USCCSP 2003).
Global warming, whatever its underly-
ing causes, is expected to have adverse,
possibly irreversible effects on the Earth’s
climate, including changes in regional tem-
perature and rainfall patterns and more
frequent extreme weather events. Climate
change will affect the ecology of the planet
by impacting biodiversity, causing species
extinctions, altering migratory patterns,
and disturbing ecosystems in countless
ways. Climate change will impact human
societies by affecting agriculture, water
supplies, water quality, settlement patterns,
and health.
Overall, climate change is likely to in-
tensify the already increasing pressures on
various sectors. Although the impact of cli-
mate change may, in some cases, be smaller
than other stresses on the environment,
even relatively small changes can have seri-
ous adverse effects, especially where there
may be critical thresholds, where
development is already marginal, or where
a region is less able to implement adapta-
tion measures (DETR 1997).
For example, climate change is likely
to exacerbate already increasing pressure
being put on water resources by a growing
global population, particularly in Africa,
Central America, the Indian subcontinent,
and southern Europe. By the 2050s, mod-
els indicate that there may be an additional
100 million people living in countries with
extreme water stress due to climate change
alone (DETR 1997).
Figure 3.16: Climate change is the result of complex interactions among many factors. Source: IPCC (2001)
Credit: Topfoto

81
Carbon dioxide, the gas largely blamed
for global warming, has reached record-
high levels in the atmosphere (Hanley
2004). Carbon dioxide levels have risen
by 30 per cent in the last 200 years as a
result of industrial emissions, automobiles,
and rapid forest burning, especially in the
tropics. Much of this increase has occurred
since 1960. This increase in CO2 is thought
to enhance the Earth’s natural greenhouse
effect and thus increase global tempera-
tures (Figure 3.17).
The Intergovernmental Panel on Cli-
mate Change projects that, if unchecked,
atmospheric carbon dioxide concentra-
tions will range from 650 to 970 ppm by
2100. As a result, the panel estimates, aver-
age global temperature may rise by 1.4ºC
(2.5ºF) to 5.8ºC (10.4ºF) between 1990 and
2100 (Hanley 2004).
Interestingly, increased levels of atmo-
spheric CO2 may stimulate the growth of
some kinds of plants. Researchers in the
Amazon have noted increased growth rates
in several species of trees (Laurance et al.
2004). The forests are also becoming more
dynamic, with existing trees dying and be-
ing replaced by new trees at a more rapid
pace. In addition, the species composition
of the forest is changing. Rising atmospher-
ic CO2 concentrations may explain these
changes, although the effects of this and
other large-scale environmental alterations
remain uncertain.
Air Pollution
Air pollution is the presence of contami-
nants or pollutant substances in the air that
interfere with human health or welfare
or produce other harmful environmental
effects (EEA 2004). The term “smog”—first
coined in London, England, to describe
a combination of smoke and fog—is now
used in reference to a specific combination
of airborne particles, gases, and chemicals
that together affect peoples’ health and
their natural environment (Health
Canada 2003).
Aerosols are tiny particles suspended
in the air. Some occur naturally, originat-
ing from volcanoes, dust storms, forest
and grassland fires, living vegetation, and
sea spray. Human activities, such as the
burning of fossil fuels and the alteration of
natural land cover, also generate aerosols.
Averaged over the globe, human-gener-
ated aerosols currently account for about
ten per cent of total atmospheric aerosols.
Most of those aerosols are concentrated
in the Northern Hemisphere, especially
downwind of industrial sites, slash-and-
burn agricultural regions, and overgrazed
grasslands (Figure 3.18).
As the composition of Earth’s atmo-
sphere changes, so does its ability to ab-
sorb, reflect and retain solar energy. Green-
house gases, including water vapor, trap
heat in the atmosphere. Airborne aerosols
from human and natural sources absorb or
reflect solar energy based on colour, shape,
size, and substance. The impact of aerosols,
tropospheric ozone, and upper tropospher-
ic water vapor on Earth’s climate remains
largely unquantified (NASA 1989).
About 25 per cent of the world’s popu-
lation is exposed to potentially harmful
amounts of SO2, O3, and particulate matter
in smog (Schwela 1995). Globally, some 50
per cent of cases of chronic respiratory ill-
ness are now thought to be associated with
air pollution (UNEP 1999b).
Some pollutants travel long distances
on the wind, causing acid deposition in
the surrounding countryside and even in
neighboring countries. In the 1980s, “acid
rain” was identified as a major internation-
al environmental problem, moving from
Figure 3.17: For more than 40 years, researchers at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, have tracked the steady
increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide (concentration expressed in parts per million, or ppm). Source: SIO
(2004) and SeaWiFS: NASA Carbon Cycle Initiative, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio (2004).
Source: NASA (2004b)
Figure 3.18: Aerosol particles larger than 1 mi-
crometre are composed primarily of windblown dust
and sea salt from sea spray. Aerosols smaller than
1 micrometre are mostly formed by condensation
processes, such as the conversion of SO2
gas released
by volcanic eruptions to sulfate particles and by for-
mation of soot and smoke during burning processes.
After aerosols form, they are mixed and transported
throughout the atmosphere by wind and weather; they
are removed from the atmosphere primarily through
cloud formation and precipitation. Source: http://earthob-
servatory.nasa.gov/Library/Aerosols/ (NASA 2004c)

82
heavily industrialized areas of both Europe
and North America into prime agricultural
areas that lay downwind. Mountain regions
suffered the most because their higher
rainfall increased the volume of acid depo-
sition and their often thin soils could not
neutralize the acid. Lakes and streams in
pristine parts of Scandinavia and Scotland
became acidified, and fish populations
were decimated in some areas. The most
intense acid rain fallout occurred in the
so-called Black Triangle region bordered
by Germany, Czech Republic, and Poland
(Harrison and Pearce 2001) (Figure 3.19).
Acid precipitation decreased through-
out the 1980s and 1990s across large por-
tions of North America and Europe. Many
recent studies have attributed observed
reversals in surface-water acidification at
national and regional scales to this de-
cline (Stoddard et al. 1999; Larssen 2004).
Decreases in acid precipitation have been
achieved largely through improved flue gas
treatments, fuel switching, use of low-sulfur
fuels in power stations, and use of catalytic
converters in automobiles. Since 1985,
international treaties and heavy investment
in desulphurization equipment by power
station operators have cut sulfur pollution
in Europe and North America by as much
as 80 per cent (Harrison and Pearce 2001).
Although significant progress has been
made in controlling acid-forming emissions
in some countries, the global threat from
acid precipitation still remains. In fact, the
problem is growing rapidly in Asia, where
1990s-level SO2 emissions could triple by
2010 if current trends continue. Curtailing
the already substantial acid precipitation
damage in Asia, and avoiding much more
severe damage in the future, will require
investments in pollution control similiar to
those made in Europe and North America
over the past 20 years (Downing 1997;
WRI 1998).
Nitrogen dioxide is the orange gas that
is the most visible component of most air
pollution. In many cities, NO2 and other
pollutants are suspended in the air to form
a brownish haze commonly called smog.
Nitrogen dioxide is formed when oxygen
in the air combines with nitric oxide.
Nitric oxide comes from automobiles,
aerosols, and industrial emissions, and
contributes to the formation of acid rain.
In addition, this pollutant can cause a wide
range of environmental damage, including
eutrophication of water bodies—explosive
algae growth that can deplete oxygen and
kill aquatic organisms.
Fig.3.19: Aerosols affect climate both directly by reflecting and absorbing sunlight and indirectly by modifying clouds. The Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer
(TOMS) aerosol index is an indicator of smoke and dust absorption. This figure shows aerosols—the hazy green, yellow, and red patches—crossing the Atlantic and
Pacific Oceans. Dust from the Sahara Desert is carried westward toward the Americas and provides nutrients for Amazon forests. Asian dust and pollution travel to
the Pacific Northwest. Source: NASA (http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/topstory/2004/0517aura.html) (NASA 2004a)

83
Case Study: Emissions in Paris
1999-2003
Paris, France, lies on a relatively flat plain.
Most of the time, Paris benefits from a wet
and windswept oceanic climate that en-
courages the dispersal of air pollution and
thus cleans the air. However, under certain
meteorological conditions (anticyclones
and a lack of wind), pollutants can remain
trapped in the atmosphere above the city,
where they become concentrated, resulting
in significantly higher levels of pollution.
Thus, for equivalent pollutant emissions in
terms of location and intensity, the levels of
pollutants recorded in the atmosphere can
vary by a factor of 20 according to meteoro-
logical conditions.
This explains why peaks in secondary
pollutants often affect wider areas than
peaks in primary pollutants. For example,
when the wind blows from the city in a
certain direction, the rural area surround-
ing the Paris region is also subject to ozone
pollution. Indeed, ozone levels registered
in these areas are often much higher than
those in the centre of Paris itself.
In 1994, according to the Centre
Interprofessionnel Technique d’Etude
de la Pollution Atmosphérique (CITEPA,
Inter-professional Technical Centre for
Research into Air Pollution) SO2 emissions
in the Paris region corresponded to eight
per cent of national emissions (mainland
France and overseas territories), oxides
of nitrogen (NOx) emissions to 10
per cent, Volatile Organic Compound
(non-methane) (VOCNM) emissions to 12
per cent, carbon monoxide (CO) emis-
sions to 15 per cent, and CO2 emissions to
14 per cent. Given that 19 per cent of the
population lives in the Paris region, emis-
sions per inhabitant in this area are less
than the national average for all substances
(CITEPA 1994).
Existing air-quality-monitoring tools
in the greater region of Paris provide a
constant indication of air pollution levels
at specific background and roadside loca-
tions. In addition to standard monitoring,
specific modeling applications give ex-
tensive descriptions of air-quality patterns
for several significant pollutants. Despite
the involvement of the transport sector in
monitoring local atmospheric emissions,
there is no direct and constant traffic
data feed. Recently, a project known as
HEAVEN (Healthier Environment through
the Abatement of Vehicle Emissions and
Noise) was implemented in Paris. Its main
objective was to integrate real-time traffic
information with the air quality monitoring
tools. HEAVEN helped develop and dem-
onstrate new concepts and tools to allow
cities to estimate emissions from traffic in
near-real time. This enhanced the identifi-
cation and evaluation of the best strategies
for transport demand management.
Souce: http://heaven.rec.org
Concentrations of SO2
, NOx, CO, and VOC over Paris. Source: http://www.airparif.asso.fr/english/polluants/default.htm
Annual SO2 emmissions in the Paris region Annual NOx emmissions in the Paris region
Annual CO emmissions in the Paris region Annual VOC emmissions in the Paris region
Air quality dynamics over the region of Paris, France, from 1999 to 2003. Source: http://www.airparif.asso.fr/eng-
lish/polluants/default.htm
Annual averages of SO2 in Ile-de-France from
1999 to 2003
Regional cartography of the annual level of
benzene evaluated within the framework of the
European project LIFE “RESOLUTION”
83

84
Northern Hemisphere seasonal variation in atmospheric carbon monoxide and its global distribution. Source: http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a002100/
a002150/ (NASA 2004d)
Case Study: Pollution from Wild Fires
2003–2004
Whether started by people or natural
events, fires add large quantities of pollut-
ants to the atmosphere every year, primar-
ily in the form of CO and aerosols. Satellite
sensors can help researchers distinguish
between wildfires and urban or industrial
fires. Some can also distinguish different
types of fire-generated pollutants. For
instance, two sensors aboard NASA’s Terra
satellite—the Measurements of Pollution
in the Troposphere (MOPITT) instru-
ment and the Moderate Resolution Imag-
ing Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instru-
ment—gather data on CO and aerosols,
respectively.
Carbon monoxide is one of the more
easily mapped air pollutants. In the
MOPITT-generated series of maps shown
below, global seasonal variations in CO
concentration are clearly visible (high-
est concentrations of CO appear as red).
Major concentrations of CO during dif-
ferent seasons can be easily identified and
tracked over time on such images, leading
to better understanding of sources of CO
pollution and its transcontinental trans-
port (NASA 2004d). For example, in the
summer image of this series, a very high
concentration of CO appears over west
central Africa, largely due to forest fires.
Wildfires in southern Africa are a ma-
jor source of carbon monoxide pollution.
Every August in southern Africa, thou-
sands of people equipped with lighters or
torches travel out onto the savanna and
intentionally set the dry grasslands ablaze.
Burned grasses send up tender new growth
that is ideal for cattle consumption. The
fires typically scorch an area the size of
Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, and the Dako-
tas combined. Long plumes of smoke rise
like hundreds of billowing smokestacks,
and herds of animals are sent scurrying
across open grassland.
During this fire season, a thick pall of
smoke clouds the sky for many weeks. The
smoke is laced with a number of pollut-
ants, including nitrogen oxides, carbon
monoxide, and hydrocarbons. Some of
these substances react with the intense
heat and sunlight to form ozone. Ground-
level ozone contributes to respiratory
diseases and can seriously damage crops.
At higher levels in the troposphere, ozone
molecules trap thermal radiation emanat-
ing from the Earth’s surface in the same
way as carbon dioxide and other green-
house gases do. In fact, up to 20 per cent
of the global warming experienced by the
Earth over the past 150 years is thought to
be from ozone.
In the spring of 2003, the MODIS and
MOPITT instruments were used to moni-
tor fires and fire-produced air pollutants
in Siberia, especially in the Baikal region.
These fires produced large amounts of fine
carbon aerosols that spread out over the
Pacific Ocean and remained suspended
in the atmosphere for a few days. Carbon
monoxide was also produced by the fires,
84

85
but unlike the aerosols, remained airborne
for a much longer period of time, allowing
it to cross the Pacific Ocean and reduce air
quality over North America before continu-
ing on around the globe.
Gas and particle emissions produced
as a result of fires in forests and other
vegetation impact the composition of the
atmosphere (WHO 2000). These gases and
particles interact with those generated by
fossil-fuel combustion or other technologi-
cal processes, and are major causes of ur-
ban air pollution. They also create ambient
pollution in rural areas. When biomass fuel
is burned, the process of combustion is not
complete and pollutants released include
particulate matter, carbon monoxide, ox-
ides of nitrogen, sulfur dioxide and organic
compounds. Once emitted, the pollut-
ants may undergo physical and chemical
changes. Thus, vegetation fires are major
contributors of toxic gaseous and particle
air pollutants into the atmosphere. These
fires are also sources of “greenhouse” and
reactive gases. Particulate pollution affects
more people globally on a continuing
basis than any other type of air pollu-
tion. In 1997/98, forest fires in Southeast
Asia affected at least 70 million people in
Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia,
the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand.
Thousands of people fled the fires and
smoke and the increase in the number of
emergency visits to hospitals demonstrated
the severity of the fires and pollution they
caused (WHO 2000).
Case Study: African Fires
2002
Wildfires—from forest fires and brush fires
to grass fires and slash-and-burn agricul-
ture—can be sweeping and destructive
conflagrations, especially in wilderness or
rural areas. As biomass burns, particulates,
black carbon, and gases including CO2,
CO, NOx, CH4, and CH3Cl are produced
in great quantities. All of these pollutants
can be lofted relatively high in the atmo-
sphere due to the convective heating of a
raging fire (Graedel and Crutzen 1993).
The image at right shows fire activity in
Africa from 1 January 2002 to 31 Decem-
ber 2002. The fires are shown as tiny dots
with each dot depicting the geographic re-
gion in which fire was detected. The color
of a dot represents the number of days
since a sizable amount of fire was detected
in that region, with red-orange represent-
ing less than 20 days, orange representing
20 to 40 days, yellow representing 40 to 60
days, and gray to black representing more
than 60 days. These data were gathered
by the MODIS instrument on the Terra
satellite. MODIS detects fires by measuring
the brightness temperature of a region in
several frequency bands and looking for
hot spots where this temperature is greater
than the surrounding region.
Global statistics on the amount of land
burned worldwide every year vary consid-
erably. It has been estimated that from
7.5 million to 8.2 million km2 (4.6 million
to 5.1 million square miles) are burned
and between 1 800 million and 10 000
million metric tonnes of dry biomass are
consumed in fires annually. Global change
scenarios predict an increase in total area
burned, with an increase in very large and
intense fires.
Pollution outflow from spring 2003 fires in Siberia can be seen in the top and middle image.
These fires produced large amounts of fine carbon aerosol detected by MODIS instrument
(bright colours) on the Terra satellite, which spread over the Pacific Ocean but lasted only a few
days. They also produced carbon monoxide, which was detected by the MOPITT instrument on
the Terra satellite (bottom image). This gas can last over a month, which allowed it to cross the
Pacific Ocean and reduce air quality over North America before continuing on around the globe.
Credit: David Edwards, The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) (NASA 2004e)
African Fires during 2002 Credit: http://svs.gsfc.nasa.
gov/vis/a000000/a002800/a002890/index.html (NASA 2004f)
85

86
Case Study: Pollution in China
2001 and 2004
During February 2004, a considerable out-
flow of pollution stemmed from China and
Southeast Asia. The image at right shows
atmospheric concentrations of carbon
monoxide at an altitude of roughly 3 km
(1.9 miles) over this region that were mov-
ing across the Pacific Ocean and at some
points reaching the western coast of the
United States.
Carbon monoxide is a good indicator
of air pollution since it is produced during
combustion processes, such as the burning
of fossil fuels in urban and industrial areas,
as well as by wildfires and biomass burn-
ing in more rural areas. Industrial emis-
sions were mainly
responsible for the
high levels of car-
bon monoxide over
China in this image,
whereas emissions in
Southeast Asia were
due primarily to agri-
cultural fires.
Natural pro-
cesses and events can
also be a source of
transcontinental air pollution. In 2001, a
large dust storm developed over China (see
below). Prevailing winds swept particulates
from this storm all the way to the eastern
coast of North America.
6 April 2001 normal aerosol levels are apparent on the first day of the dust storm. 7 April 2001 - Blue represents just slightly higher-than-normal aerosols and red repre-
sents the highest concentration of aerosols.
10 April 2001 - The aerosol impact from the dust storm can clearly be seen over
China, Mongolia, Russia, Korea, Japan, and the Pacific Ocean.
13 April 2001 - The aerosol impact from the dust storm can clearly be seen over
Japan, the Pacific Ocean, Alaska, and the United States.
14 April 2001 - The aerosol impact from the dust storm can clearly be seen in the
Pacific Ocean, and the United States.
17 April 2001 - High levels of aerosols are visible over the East Coast of the United
States, especially Maine.
A large dust storm developed over China on 6-7 April 2001. This series of images shows air-borne dust from the storm moving over China, Russia, Japan,
the Pacific Ocean, Canada, and ultimately over the United States on 17 April 2001 (NASA 2004g). Visualization Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific
Visualization Studio Source: http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a002900/a002957/index.html
This image was developed from a composite of car-
bon monoxide data collected over China and South-
east Asia from 1-25 February 2004, by the Measure-
ments of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT)
instrument aboard NASA’s Terra satellite. The colors
represent the mixing ratios of carbon monoxide in
the air, given in parts per billion by volume. The
grey areas show where no data were collected due to
persistent cloud cover. Source: http://earthobservatory.nasa.
gov/Natural (NASA 2004g)
86

Atlas 3 1-atmosphere-screen

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (13)

Similar to Atlas 3 1-atmosphere-screen (20)

More from João Soares (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Atlas 3 1-atmosphere-screen