Blended Learning: Components,Considerations & an eSTP Case
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like178 views
This document discusses blended learning and its components. Blended learning combines online and face-to-face instruction through synchronous and asynchronous methods. It allows for flexibility in instruction and evaluation. Considerations for blending include ensuring the right mix of learning strategies and taking an integrated approach. The document outlines the components of a case study on establishing an aerodrome manual that uses a blended learning approach combining self-paced eLearning modules, virtual classroom sessions, mastery tests, and peer discussion.
![Source: Chapman, B. (2010). How Long
Does it Take to Create Learning?
[Research Study]. Published by Chapman
Alliance LLC.
http://www.chapmanalliance.com/howlo
ng/
Pre-reading,
6% Pretest, 3%
Classroom
Session(s) -
ILT, 24%
Virtual
Classroom,
12%
Self-paced
eLearning,
23%
Online
Simulations,
7%
Live
Simulations,
5%
Assigned
Homework,
4%
Assigned on-
the-job
training
tasks, 4%
Knowledge-
Based Test,
6%
Posttest, 3%
Post Course
Observation
Worksheets,
2%
Other, 2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
© The ASI Institute 5
Blended
Learning
Components
Radar chart showing
components most
frequently used as part
of a blended learning
course](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/icaotpistanbulkschneider-170730055943/85/Blended-Learning-Components-Considerations-an-eSTP-Case-5-320.jpg)
![Source: Chapman, B. (2013). Large Scale,
Blended Learning Development: Benchmark
[Research Study]. Published by Chapman
Alliance LLC.
http://www.chapmanalliance.com/blendedlear
ningstudy/
The median duration of course is 3-days in
length (24 hours)
Range from 45 minutes to 800 hours (100 days)
Average development ratio 49:1
Average cost per finished hour $3,938 USD
Creating “new” content
increases development
ratio to 69:1
Outsourcing content
reduces development
ratio to 31:1, but
increases the cost per
finished hour by $1,158
Shorter courses (>1 day)
increase the
development ratio to
81:1
© The ASI Institute 10
Blended
Learning
Development
Benchmarks
List of key research
findings on Blended
Learning Production](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/icaotpistanbulkschneider-170730055943/85/Blended-Learning-Components-Considerations-an-eSTP-Case-10-320.jpg)
![References
Bonk, C. J. & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (in press). Handbook of blended learning:
Global Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
http://www.publicationshare.com/c083_bonk_future.pdf
Chapman, B. (2010). How Long Does it Take to Create Learning? [Research
Study]. Published by Chapman Alliance LLC. www.chapmanalliance.com
Chapman, B. (2013). Large Scale, Blended Learning Development: Benchmark
[Research Study]. Published by Chapman Alliance LLC.
www.chapmanalliance.com
Garrison, R., & Vaughan, H. (2008). Blended learning in higher education:
Framework, principles and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Greenlaw, S. A., & DeLoach, S. B. (2004). Teaching critical thinking with
electronic discussion. Journal of Economic Education, 34(1).
Rovai, A. P. (2000). Online and traditional assessments: what is the difference?
The Internet and Higher Education 3(3).
Tabor, S. (2007). Narrowing the distance: Implementing a hybrid learning
model for information security education. The Quarterly Review of Distance
Education, 8(1), 47-57.
© The ASI Institute 26](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/icaotpistanbulkschneider-170730055943/85/Blended-Learning-Components-Considerations-an-eSTP-Case-26-320.jpg)
Blended Learning: Components,Considerations & an eSTP Case
- 1. Full Member Blended Learning: Components, Considerations & an eSTP Case Kristina Schneider Director, Learning Strategies and Educational Technology Services The ASI Institute - A Division of Aviation Strategies International
- 2. © The ASI Institute Defining Blended Learning Integrated instructional approach, which combines • online and face-to-face instruction • synchronous and asynchronous learning • collaborative and self- paced learing •Instructor-led training and workshops •Coaching •On-the-job training Face-to-face •Webinars live streaming •Live simulations •Serious games •Coaching Online Synchronous •Discussion forums •Social media networking •Case-based group work Asynchronous Collaborative •Self-paced eLearning •Edublogging •Progress and mastery tests Asynchronous Self-Paced
- 3. Considerations for Blending Should not be developed in silos but rather must be managed from a focal point. Requires ensuring that the right mix of learning strategies is used Requires taking an integrated systemic approach © The ASI Institute 3
- 4. © The ASI Institute 4 Blended Learning Components Allows for flexibility to combine methods for instruction and evaluation objective-based self-evaluation peer assessment observation case-based simulation on-the-job professional review evaluation methods instructor-led self-study collaborative peer-to-peer coaching on-the-job methods of instruction
- 5. Source: Chapman, B. (2010). How Long Does it Take to Create Learning? [Research Study]. Published by Chapman Alliance LLC. http://www.chapmanalliance.com/howlo ng/ Pre-reading, 6% Pretest, 3% Classroom Session(s) - ILT, 24% Virtual Classroom, 12% Self-paced eLearning, 23% Online Simulations, 7% Live Simulations, 5% Assigned Homework, 4% Assigned on- the-job training tasks, 4% Knowledge- Based Test, 6% Posttest, 3% Post Course Observation Worksheets, 2% Other, 2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% © The ASI Institute 5 Blended Learning Components Radar chart showing components most frequently used as part of a blended learning course
- 6. Blended Learning Course Compositions Fully online course with a blend of synchronous and asynchronous components. Self-paced learning activities online, supplemented with face-to-face workshops Supplementary role, helping to support face to face instruction. © The ASI Institute 6 There is no standard blend: each project will require a different set of components
- 7. Motivations for Blending To train larger groups in a cost efficient manner To allow learners learn at their pace, on their time To appeal to generation Y workers To keep up with trends To… (insert your reason here) © The ASI Institute 7
- 8. © The ASI Institute 8 Future Directions of Blended Learning Future predictions of most widely used pedagogical techniques for e-learning in workplace learning settings Bonk, C. J. & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (in press). Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing. http://www.publicationshare.com/c083_b onk_future.pdf
- 9. © The ASI Institute 9 Future Directions of Blended Learning Emerging technologies for e-learning that will have the greatest impact on the delivery of e-learning in workplace learning settings during the next few years Bonk, C. J. & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (in press). Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing. http://www.publicationshare.com/c083_b onk_future.pdf Extremely useful for performance support, job aids and online communities of practice
- 10. Source: Chapman, B. (2013). Large Scale, Blended Learning Development: Benchmark [Research Study]. Published by Chapman Alliance LLC. http://www.chapmanalliance.com/blendedlear ningstudy/ The median duration of course is 3-days in length (24 hours) Range from 45 minutes to 800 hours (100 days) Average development ratio 49:1 Average cost per finished hour $3,938 USD Creating “new” content increases development ratio to 69:1 Outsourcing content reduces development ratio to 31:1, but increases the cost per finished hour by $1,158 Shorter courses (>1 day) increase the development ratio to 81:1 © The ASI Institute 10 Blended Learning Development Benchmarks List of key research findings on Blended Learning Production
- 11. Benefits Challenges © The ASI Institute 11 Blended Learning Benefits and Challenges In each instance, it is crucial to weight the benefits against the challenges.
- 12. Blended Learning Strategy Improved performance: stronger participant learning outcomes Reduction of costs: rapid and efficient delivery of learning Increased access: via online systems integrated to existing networks Increased convenience and flexibility: e- learning 24/7 anywhere Increased digital literacy: a required professional skill © The ASI Institute 12 Blended Learning Strategy The blended learning environment leverages the best of the available learning strategies in order to deliver the content in a more effective and efficient way
- 13. eSTP Case © The ASI Institute 13 Establishmen t of an Aerodrome Manual
- 14. Learning Portal Participants access the ASI Institute Learning Portal, which is where they will find all their course content and support. © The ASI Institute 14
- 15. Learning and Technical Guidance Participants will be accompanied through each course by a team of instructors as well as a technical support team. How can we help you? © The ASI Institute 15
- 16. Preparatory Tutorial Participants are provided with a Getting Started Tutorial with the basics on how to navigate the Learning Portal and their Online Course. © The ASI Institute 16
- 17. © The ASI Institute 17 Learning Portal Participants have access to all the resources they will need in one Virtual Learning Environment.
- 18. Course Components Interactive self-paced e-learning modules Two modules are released each Thursday for the following week Interactive online sessions Mondays at 20:00 ET Tuesdays at 08:00 ET participants are required to attend only one session Mastery Tests Due on Wednesdays and Saturdays © The ASI Institute 18 The Online Courses last 4 weeks online, however the workload is equivalent to 1 week face-to-face.
- 19. Virtual Classroom, 10% Self-paced eLearning, 40% Progress Tests, 10% Mastery Tests, 30% Peer Discussion, 10% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% © The ASI Institute 19 Blended Learning Course Components Radar chart showing components employed in the ASI Institute eSTP.
- 20. Self-paced E-learning Modules © The ASI Institute 20
- 21. Virtual Meeting Session © The ASI Institute 21
- 22. Success Conditions Organizational Readiness Instructor Readiness Participant Readiness Instructor-led Approach Totally Blended Approach Sharing of Experience Technical Support © The ASI Institute 22
- 23. Development and Delivery Resources eSTPs in development by the ASI Institute in cooperation with ICAO, available in 2014 Design and Development of an eSTP Online Instructor Techniques © The ASI Institute 23
- 24. Next eSTP Offering © The ASI Institute 24
- 25. Thank you for your time © The ASI Institute 25
- 26. References Bonk, C. J. & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (in press). Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing. http://www.publicationshare.com/c083_bonk_future.pdf Chapman, B. (2010). How Long Does it Take to Create Learning? [Research Study]. Published by Chapman Alliance LLC. www.chapmanalliance.com Chapman, B. (2013). Large Scale, Blended Learning Development: Benchmark [Research Study]. Published by Chapman Alliance LLC. www.chapmanalliance.com Garrison, R., & Vaughan, H. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Greenlaw, S. A., & DeLoach, S. B. (2004). Teaching critical thinking with electronic discussion. Journal of Economic Education, 34(1). Rovai, A. P. (2000). Online and traditional assessments: what is the difference? The Internet and Higher Education 3(3). Tabor, S. (2007). Narrowing the distance: Implementing a hybrid learning model for information security education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 47-57. © The ASI Institute 26