SlideShare a Scribd company logo
3
Most read
4
Most read
5
Most read
October 24, 2014 
1 
---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- 
Calculation of Maximum Flow of Natural Gas through a Pipeline using Dynamic Simulation in Aspen HYSYS 
Muhammad Waqas Manzoor 
Process Engineer 
Email: engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com 
Synopsis: 
A dynamic simulation in Aspen HYSYS was performed to assess the maximum gas carrying capacity of a NPS 6” SCH 80 pipeline having length of 12 km. At upstream end, the pipeline is connected with a Natural Gas Regulating Station and at downstream end the pipeline is connected with domestic consumer pipeline network. The pressure required by domestic consumer is very less compared with the pipeline pressure i.e. about 4 inches WC = 0.144 psig. Therefore, to calculate the maximum flow (or choke flow) through the pipeline, 0 psig has been considered at downstream of the NPS 6” SCH 80 12 km long pipeline. The pipeline absolute roughness for calculation of frictional pressure drop has been considered to be equal to 0.04572 millimeters, which is the same as of carbon steel pipes. 
Background Information: 
The Natural Gas Regulating Station can supply gas at a pressure of 40 psig to 100 psig, using a pressure control valve, as per the seasonal consumer demand. During winter season the pressure may be increased to 100 psig and during summer season the pressure may be reduced to 50 psig because gas consumption during winter season is higher as compared to that in summer season, and only by increasing the gas pressure at the downstream of the Natural Gas Regulating Station, the gas flow rate can be increased. The pressure at the upstream of the Natural Gas Regulating Station is about 395 psig. However, it depends on pressure setting at downstream of Natural Gas Regulating Station. Higher the downstream pressure, higher would be gas flow rate and lower would be the upstream pressure. 
Natural Gas Regulating Station 
Inlet Pressure = 400 to 500 psig 
Outlet Pressure = 50 to 100 psig 
6”Pipeline 12km 
Domestic Consumer Network 
Required 2 to 3 MMSCFD in 2014 
Forecast for 2015 is 5 to 6 MMSCFD 
6”Offtake 20 meters 
16”Burried Mainline near Natural Gas Regulating Station
October 24, 2014 
2 
---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- 
HYSYS Simulation Results: 
Following are the results of the Dynamic Simulation, 
S. No. 
Pressure at U/S of Regulating Station (psig) 
Pressure at D/S of Regulating Station (psig) 
Max. Flow rate across NPS 6” 12 km long pipeline at D/S of Regulating Station (MMSCFD) 
1. 
397.0 
50 
2.08 
2. 
396.4 
60 
2.46 
3. 
395.2 
80 
3.23 
4. 
394.6 
90 
3.62 
5. 
394.0 
100 
4.01 
It may also be noted that the actual absolute roughness would also be higher than 0.0457 millimeters depending on the aging of pipeline and therefore, the actual maximum flow rate would be less than the values calculated in this simulation. Therefore, the said line would be unable to cater the natural gas demand if it increases beyond 4 MMSCFD in 2015, as per the forecast. 
The application of Dynamic Simulation in this particular case holds significance because Steady State Simulation cannot simulate pressure balancing and therefore, can never imitate actual process in which flow rate depends on pressure differential only. Even the pipe model in Steady State Simulation was unable to calculate natural gas flow rate after the total pressure drop had been specified across the 6” dia. 12 km long pipeline.
October 24, 2014 
3 
---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- 
Gas Composition 
The average gas composition for last month at the Regulating Station is used in the HYSYS Simulation. 
HYSYS Simulation Snapshots 
All these simulation snapshots were taken after the variables had reached their maximum or minimum values. 
Maximum Flow rate for 50 psig is 2.08 MMSCFD
October 24, 2014 
4 
---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- 
Maximum Flow rate for 60 psig is 2.46 MMSCFD 
Maximum Flow rate for 80 psig is 3.23 MMSCFD
October 24, 2014 
5 
---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- 
Maximum Flow rate for 90 psig is 3.62 MMSCFD 
Maximum Flow rate for 100 psig is 4.01 MMSCFD
October 24, 2014 
6 
---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- 
Steady State Simulation 
The pipe model in Steady State Simulation was unable to calculate natural gas flow rate after the total pressure drop had been specified across the 6” dia. 12 km long pipeline. Total Pressure Drop = 50 psig - 0 psig = 50 psi
October 24, 2014 
7 
---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- 
Flow rate calculation using Different Pressure Drop Correlations 
Below is the comparison between flow rate calculated using different pressure drop correlations in the Dynamic Simulation of only the 6” pipe,

More Related Content

PDF
HTRI PRESENTATION.pdf
PDF
Psv scenario-and-calculation
PDF
Impact of No. of Pipe Segments on the flow rate calculated by Pipe Model (Pag...
PDF
PSV Sizing - API Based
PPTX
Pressure Relief Valve Sizing for Single Phase Flow
PDF
Determination of vacuum pump operational efficiency
PPTX
To Study Well Design Aspects in HPHT Environment
PPT
psv and pvrvdesign calculation.ppt
HTRI PRESENTATION.pdf
Psv scenario-and-calculation
Impact of No. of Pipe Segments on the flow rate calculated by Pipe Model (Pag...
PSV Sizing - API Based
Pressure Relief Valve Sizing for Single Phase Flow
Determination of vacuum pump operational efficiency
To Study Well Design Aspects in HPHT Environment
psv and pvrvdesign calculation.ppt

What's hot (20)

PDF
Gas Plant Separator Design
PDF
Application of UG-140 for overpressure protection
PDF
Basics of two phase flow (gas-liquid) line sizing
PDF
ESP ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION BY UTILIZING THE OPERATIONAL TRENDS
PPTX
PDF
Pressure relief system_design
PDF
Line Sizing presentation on Types and governing Equations.
PDF
Sizing of relief valves for supercritical fluids
PPTX
Factors effecting vertical lift performance
PPTX
PDF
psv specifications
PPTX
Centrifugal compressor head - Impact of MW and other parameters
PDF
Basic Tutorial on Aspen HYSYS Dynamics - Process control (Tutorial 3)
PDF
Rupture Disks for Process Engineers
PPT
Ai Ch E Overpressure Protection Training
PDF
Design Considerations for Antisurge Valve Sizing
PPTX
Aspen HYSYS - Petroleum Assays and Oil Characterization (Slideshare)
PDF
PSV Calculation and Philosophy.pdf
PDF
Gas Compression Stages – Process Design & Optimization
PPTX
Pressure Relief valve sizing and design
Gas Plant Separator Design
Application of UG-140 for overpressure protection
Basics of two phase flow (gas-liquid) line sizing
ESP ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION BY UTILIZING THE OPERATIONAL TRENDS
Pressure relief system_design
Line Sizing presentation on Types and governing Equations.
Sizing of relief valves for supercritical fluids
Factors effecting vertical lift performance
psv specifications
Centrifugal compressor head - Impact of MW and other parameters
Basic Tutorial on Aspen HYSYS Dynamics - Process control (Tutorial 3)
Rupture Disks for Process Engineers
Ai Ch E Overpressure Protection Training
Design Considerations for Antisurge Valve Sizing
Aspen HYSYS - Petroleum Assays and Oil Characterization (Slideshare)
PSV Calculation and Philosophy.pdf
Gas Compression Stages – Process Design & Optimization
Pressure Relief valve sizing and design
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PDF
Presentation on Calculation of Polytropic and Isentropic Efficiency of natura...
PDF
Aspen hysys dynamic modeling
PDF
Calculation of pipeline capacity using steady state and dynamic simulation an...
PDF
Presentation on Calculation of Line Pack of Natural Gas Pipe using Aspen PLUS...
PDF
Dynamic Simulation of an LPG Storage Facility in Aspen HYSYS, along with a pu...
PDF
Module 1 - Introduction to Aspen HYSYS
PDF
Dynamic Simulation of Cooling Water Circuit in Aspen HYSYS
PDF
Hysys simulation
PPTX
reciprocating compressor
PDF
Baijan Savalan Hysys v8.0
PPT
Sngpl
DOCX
PPL Report
PPTX
Presentation1
PPTX
SEMINAR AGA REPORT NO 7
PDF
Module 2 - Fluid Characterization
PDF
Tutorial hysys
PDF
Summer Internship Project Report on 'e-Procurement' SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY
PDF
Hysys tutorial
PPS
Multivariable Flow Measurement
PDF
Final Exercise - Methanol Process
Presentation on Calculation of Polytropic and Isentropic Efficiency of natura...
Aspen hysys dynamic modeling
Calculation of pipeline capacity using steady state and dynamic simulation an...
Presentation on Calculation of Line Pack of Natural Gas Pipe using Aspen PLUS...
Dynamic Simulation of an LPG Storage Facility in Aspen HYSYS, along with a pu...
Module 1 - Introduction to Aspen HYSYS
Dynamic Simulation of Cooling Water Circuit in Aspen HYSYS
Hysys simulation
reciprocating compressor
Baijan Savalan Hysys v8.0
Sngpl
PPL Report
Presentation1
SEMINAR AGA REPORT NO 7
Module 2 - Fluid Characterization
Tutorial hysys
Summer Internship Project Report on 'e-Procurement' SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY
Hysys tutorial
Multivariable Flow Measurement
Final Exercise - Methanol Process
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
PPTX
Engineering Ethics, Safety and Environment [Autosaved] (1).pptx
PPTX
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
PDF
Enhancing Cyber Defense Against Zero-Day Attacks using Ensemble Neural Networks
PPT
Project quality management in manufacturing
PPTX
Internet of Things (IOT) - A guide to understanding
PPTX
FINAL REVIEW FOR COPD DIANOSIS FOR PULMONARY DISEASE.pptx
PDF
composite construction of structures.pdf
PPTX
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction
PPTX
Current and future trends in Computer Vision.pptx
PDF
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
PDF
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf
PDF
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
PDF
TFEC-4-2020-Design-Guide-for-Timber-Roof-Trusses.pdf
PPTX
UNIT-1 - COAL BASED THERMAL POWER PLANTS
PDF
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
PDF
PREDICTION OF DIABETES FROM ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS
PPTX
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
PDF
keyrequirementskkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
PPTX
additive manufacturing of ss316l using mig welding
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
Engineering Ethics, Safety and Environment [Autosaved] (1).pptx
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
Enhancing Cyber Defense Against Zero-Day Attacks using Ensemble Neural Networks
Project quality management in manufacturing
Internet of Things (IOT) - A guide to understanding
FINAL REVIEW FOR COPD DIANOSIS FOR PULMONARY DISEASE.pptx
composite construction of structures.pdf
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction
Current and future trends in Computer Vision.pptx
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
TFEC-4-2020-Design-Guide-for-Timber-Roof-Trusses.pdf
UNIT-1 - COAL BASED THERMAL POWER PLANTS
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
PREDICTION OF DIABETES FROM ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
keyrequirementskkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
additive manufacturing of ss316l using mig welding

Calculation of Maximum Flow of Natural Gas through a Pipeline using Dynamic Simulation in Aspen HYSYS

  • 1. October 24, 2014 1 ---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- Calculation of Maximum Flow of Natural Gas through a Pipeline using Dynamic Simulation in Aspen HYSYS Muhammad Waqas Manzoor Process Engineer Email: engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com Synopsis: A dynamic simulation in Aspen HYSYS was performed to assess the maximum gas carrying capacity of a NPS 6” SCH 80 pipeline having length of 12 km. At upstream end, the pipeline is connected with a Natural Gas Regulating Station and at downstream end the pipeline is connected with domestic consumer pipeline network. The pressure required by domestic consumer is very less compared with the pipeline pressure i.e. about 4 inches WC = 0.144 psig. Therefore, to calculate the maximum flow (or choke flow) through the pipeline, 0 psig has been considered at downstream of the NPS 6” SCH 80 12 km long pipeline. The pipeline absolute roughness for calculation of frictional pressure drop has been considered to be equal to 0.04572 millimeters, which is the same as of carbon steel pipes. Background Information: The Natural Gas Regulating Station can supply gas at a pressure of 40 psig to 100 psig, using a pressure control valve, as per the seasonal consumer demand. During winter season the pressure may be increased to 100 psig and during summer season the pressure may be reduced to 50 psig because gas consumption during winter season is higher as compared to that in summer season, and only by increasing the gas pressure at the downstream of the Natural Gas Regulating Station, the gas flow rate can be increased. The pressure at the upstream of the Natural Gas Regulating Station is about 395 psig. However, it depends on pressure setting at downstream of Natural Gas Regulating Station. Higher the downstream pressure, higher would be gas flow rate and lower would be the upstream pressure. Natural Gas Regulating Station Inlet Pressure = 400 to 500 psig Outlet Pressure = 50 to 100 psig 6”Pipeline 12km Domestic Consumer Network Required 2 to 3 MMSCFD in 2014 Forecast for 2015 is 5 to 6 MMSCFD 6”Offtake 20 meters 16”Burried Mainline near Natural Gas Regulating Station
  • 2. October 24, 2014 2 ---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- HYSYS Simulation Results: Following are the results of the Dynamic Simulation, S. No. Pressure at U/S of Regulating Station (psig) Pressure at D/S of Regulating Station (psig) Max. Flow rate across NPS 6” 12 km long pipeline at D/S of Regulating Station (MMSCFD) 1. 397.0 50 2.08 2. 396.4 60 2.46 3. 395.2 80 3.23 4. 394.6 90 3.62 5. 394.0 100 4.01 It may also be noted that the actual absolute roughness would also be higher than 0.0457 millimeters depending on the aging of pipeline and therefore, the actual maximum flow rate would be less than the values calculated in this simulation. Therefore, the said line would be unable to cater the natural gas demand if it increases beyond 4 MMSCFD in 2015, as per the forecast. The application of Dynamic Simulation in this particular case holds significance because Steady State Simulation cannot simulate pressure balancing and therefore, can never imitate actual process in which flow rate depends on pressure differential only. Even the pipe model in Steady State Simulation was unable to calculate natural gas flow rate after the total pressure drop had been specified across the 6” dia. 12 km long pipeline.
  • 3. October 24, 2014 3 ---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- Gas Composition The average gas composition for last month at the Regulating Station is used in the HYSYS Simulation. HYSYS Simulation Snapshots All these simulation snapshots were taken after the variables had reached their maximum or minimum values. Maximum Flow rate for 50 psig is 2.08 MMSCFD
  • 4. October 24, 2014 4 ---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- Maximum Flow rate for 60 psig is 2.46 MMSCFD Maximum Flow rate for 80 psig is 3.23 MMSCFD
  • 5. October 24, 2014 5 ---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- Maximum Flow rate for 90 psig is 3.62 MMSCFD Maximum Flow rate for 100 psig is 4.01 MMSCFD
  • 6. October 24, 2014 6 ---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- Steady State Simulation The pipe model in Steady State Simulation was unable to calculate natural gas flow rate after the total pressure drop had been specified across the 6” dia. 12 km long pipeline. Total Pressure Drop = 50 psig - 0 psig = 50 psi
  • 7. October 24, 2014 7 ---- Muhammad Waqas Manzoor ---- Process Engineer ---- Engr.waqasmanzoor@gmail.com ---- Flow rate calculation using Different Pressure Drop Correlations Below is the comparison between flow rate calculated using different pressure drop correlations in the Dynamic Simulation of only the 6” pipe,