The document discusses the debate around whether college athletes should be compensated. It provides arguments both for and against compensation. Those arguing for compensation say college athletes generate billions in revenue but receive very little in return, while coaches' salaries have increased dramatically. Those against compensation argue that college athletes receive significant non-financial benefits like scholarships, training, and exposure that can increase their professional prospects and lifetime earnings. There are also concerns that compensation could harm non-revenue sports and create a bidding war for top recruits. The NCAA maintains that college athletes are students, not employees.