CBC 2022_FinalDraftGuidlines_Design.pdf

Draft Guidelines
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA)
Government of India
Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi
BEAUTY
2022

This document presents draft guidelines for the city beauty competition launched by the Ministry of
Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India. Any feedback, comments and suggestions on these
guidelines could be submitted over email to cbc.asci@gmail.com before 15th
January 2023.
City Beauty Competition
Draft Guidelines

5
Sh. Hardeep Singh Puri
Union Minister for Housing and Urban Affairs
Message
As the pace of urbanization gains momentum in India, there is a growing need to not only transform
wards and cities into more beautiful and livable habitats, but also to revive and preserve the rich
cultural heritage and local pride of these places. Recognizing this, Hon’ble Prime Minister in the
‘National Conference of Chief Secretaries’ held at Dharmshala, Himachal Pradesh in June 2022,
observed that beautification of cities may be accorded high priority with a competition based
approach right down to the ward level.
The ‘City Beauty Competition’ has been designed and conceived by Ministry of Housing and Urban
Affairs to encourage and recognize the transformational efforts made by the cities and wards in India
towards creating beautiful, innovative and inclusive public spaces. This Competition aims to open up
opportunities for wards and cities to showcase their interventions towards creating beautiful public
spaces. It would promote conservation of the rich traditions and cultural heritage of cities, create
sustainable communities, usher in ecological conservation, while also boosting the local economy.
Participation in the City Beauty Competition is voluntary. However, all wards and cities are
encouraged to participate, as this would generate healthy competition amongst them, while also
inculcating a sense of community ownership & pride.

7
Sh. Kaushal Kishore
Minister of State for Housing and Urban Affairs
Message
Growing urbanization brings with it several challenges. Cities of today need to ensure quality life to
its citizens. Good urban infrastructure and access to basic amenities are key to making our cities
beautiful, vibrant and livable. Well-maintained, sustainable and beautiful cities stimulate economic
growth and also foster a sense of pride and ownership among community members, while also
conserving the ecology.
Hon’ble Prime Minister stressed on the need to beautify cities through a competition based approach
while addressing the first National Conference of Chief Secretaries held at Dharamshala in June 2022.
In keeping with his vision, the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) is launching the
‘City Beauty Competition’ at the ward and city levels.
The City Beauty Competition is a platform to celebrate and promote the efforts of wards and cities
across India in developing and revitalizing public spaces including green spaces, waterfronts, heritage
sites, and market spaces. The competition will facilitate peer learning across states and cities and
promote creation of beautiful and sustainable public spaces in urban India. I urge all wards and cities
to participate whole-heartedly in this competition.

9
Sh. Manoj Joshi
Secretary, MoHUA
Message
The ‘City Beauty Competition’ designed by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA)
has been conceived and designed as a platform to evaluate, recognize and reward wards and public
spaces in cities across five broad pillars viz. aesthetics, accessibility, amenities, activities and ecology.
It aims to encourage cities to conserve their rich traditional heritage, streamline their delivery
mechanisms for efficient provisioning of basic infrastructure, develop community participation,
imbibe the tenets of ecological conservation, and promote local economy.
The competition would felicitate most beautiful wards both at the city and State levels, while Cities
would be awarded for their most beautiful public places both at State and National level for their most
beautiful Waterfronts, Green spaces, tourist/heritage spaces and market/commercial places. Healthy
competition amongst wards and cities would encourage urban local bodies to improve their basic
infrastructure, and also make the urban spaces beautiful, sustainable and inclusive.
I hope that this initiative of MoHUA will encourage wards and cities to come forward to showcase
their initiatives and interventions towards creating functionally beautiful public spaces, while also
preserving their rich cultural heritage.

11
Contents
1. Context ..................................................................................................................13
2. City beauty competition........................................................................................14
3. Award categories and process...............................................................................14
4. Guiding principles and evaluation ........................................................................16
5. Annexures..............................................................................................................20
Annexure 1: Composition of independent jury at state and national level..............20
Annexure 2: Supporting material for submitting the application ............................21
Annexure 3: Assessment factors and weightage......................................................22

13
1. Context
India’s urban population is estimated to be 60 crores by 2030. Ramping up the urban infrastructure
and access to basic amenities are important. Making our cities beautiful and vibrant is equally
important to improve the quality of life and happiness of citizens. Beautiful cities will also attract
tourists, both from within the country and abroad, thus boosting the economy of the cities.
While addressing the first National Conference of Chief Secretaries held at Dharamshala in June
2022, the Hon’ble Prime Minister stated that the beautification of cities should be accorded high
priority with a competition-based approach at the ward level. In keeping with this vision of the
Hon’ble Prime Minister, the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) is launching the ‘City
Beauty Competition’ for the wards and cities. The competition is an opportunity for the wards and
cities to showcase their initiatives toward creating beautiful public spaces.
This document presents the process and methodology to be followed by urban local bodies for
participating in the ‘City Beauty Competition.’
The city beauty competition focuses on the visual and functional beauty of public spaces in
creating liveable and enjoyable Indian cities.
Visual beauty refers to the visual appeal of urban spaces by achieving vibrancy through design in the
form of colour, light, form and structure. The functional beauty is the quality urban infrastructure
providing ease of access to basic amenities for a quality life. These can help to create public spaces
that are both visually appealing and sustainable, contributing to the overall beauty of the city.

14
2. City Beauty Competition
The ‘City Beauty Competition’ aims to encourage and recognise the transformational efforts made
by the cities and wards in India to create beautiful, innovative and inclusive public spaces, enabling:
• Community ownership & pride
• Improved quality of life
• Heritage and cultural conservation
• Neighborhood revitalization
• Sustainable communities and ecological conservation
• Impetus to the local economic development
This competition is a platform to celebrate and promote the efforts made by Indian cities in developing
and revitalising public spaces, viz., green spaces, waterfront, heritage and tourist sites, and
commercial and market spaces. It will facilitate peer learning across states and cities to build
exemplary public spaces in urban India. This initiative also includes a ward-level competition to
inculcate a competitive spirit within the cities.
3. Award Categories and Process
Stage 1 - Registration
All the cities are eligible to participate in the ‘City Beauty Competition’. The cities and wards shall
participate in the competition voluntarily. The following is the list of award categories:
A. City and State-level Awards: Beautiful Wards
B. State and National-level Awards: Beautiful Public Spaces
1. Beautiful waterfront
2. Beautiful green spaces
3. Beautiful tourist/heritage site
4. Beautiful market/commercial place
A dedicated online portal is developed for the competition. The portal provides a secure environment
for submitting, reviewing, and approval of data related to the competition. The wards will register at
the online portal to participate in the competition. The cities are eligible to register and participate in
multiple categories listed above. However, cities have to register as a separate entry for each category.
On registration, the cities and wards shall submit the required information in the prescribed format.
The prescribed format comprises input data against indicators (Ref. Annexure 3), a comprehensive

15
presentation, and a video (Ref. Annexure 2). Applications complete in all respect will be considered
for the competition.
Stage 2 – Third Party Validation
State government can engage a Third-Party Agency (TPA) to validate the data submitted by the wards
and cities through the web portal.
Stage 3 – Evaluation of Entries and Awards
A. Establishing an independent jury
The state governments will constitute an independent jury comprising eminent experts (Ref.
Annexure 1) that will evaluate the ward and city-level entries for the awards. The jury will take inputs
from TPA for evaluation.
Likewise, MoHUA will establish an independent jury to shortlist entries for the national awards.
B. Awards categories – State and the National level
City and State level Awards: Beautiful Wards
• The state-level jury will select the best ward in each city.
• The state-level jury will also select the top three in the state from the short-listed best wards.
Then, the state government will felicitate the best wards with an award at a state-level event.
State-level Awards: Beautiful Public Spaces
The state-level jury will select the best three entries per category i.e. waterfront, green space, tourism
& heritage, market & commercial places submitted by the cities. Then, the state government will
felicitate the three best cities per category at a state-level event.
National level Awards: Beautiful Public Spaces
The state governments will nominate the top entry per public spaces category for the national award.
The national-level independent jury will select the top public places (up to three) per category from
the state governments’ entries. The Government of India will felicitate the winners at a national-level
event.

16
4. Guiding Principles and Evaluation
Guiding principles are essential to ensure the evaluation process is conducted rigorously, with
integrity, and objectively. Evaluation of a beautiful place can be subjective. Therefore, the
independent jury will evaluate the entries using well-defined indicators related to accessibility, public
amenities and activities, aesthetics, and ecology (Figure 1).
Figure 1 Guiding principles for evaluation

17
These principles are designed to provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating the beauty of the
cities. Each principle has a set of indicators (Ref. Annexure 3) that are used to measure and compare
the various aspects of public spaces.
1. Accessibility refers to the ease with which people can access and use public spaces in a city.
This includes factors such as the availability of transportation options, the proximity of public
spaces to people's homes and workplaces, and inclusive services catering for groups of people
to access the public spaces.
2. Amenities denote the features and services available in a city's public spaces. This includes
areas for children, restrooms, seating areas, public amenities, drinking water and other
facilities that make using these spaces more comfortable and convenient.
3. Aesthetics refers to the visual appeal of a city's public space. This includes factors such as the
design and layout of the spaces, the use of colour and lighting, and the presence of natural
features or landscaping. The aesthetics of public spaces can have a profound impact on the
quality of life of its citizens
4. Activities refer to the types of activities enjoyed in a city's public spaces. This includes sports,
concerts, festivals, and other events in these spaces.
5. Ecology includes factors such as the presence of green spaces, the use of sustainable materials
and practices, and the overall environmental health of the city.
Table 1 Weightage for the evaluation
No. Parameters Weightage
1 Accessibility 10 %
2 Amenities 15 %
3 Aesthetics 50 %
4 Activities 10 %
5 Ecology 15 %
The independent jury is responsible for the evaluation at the state and national levels. The framework
helps the independent jury to create a fair and unbiased assessment of public spaces by providing
valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of these spaces.
In addition to the indicators, a Third-Party Agency (TPA) will be engaged to verify the completeness
and accuracy of the entries. TPA shall support the independent jury with additional expertise and
perspective for the evaluation. Overall, third party verification can help to create a more transparent
and fair evaluation process for the city beauty competition.
Overall, the comprehensive framework is a well-rounded approach for evaluating public spaces. It
also ensures objectivity and provides insight into the effectiveness of interventions. It can provide a

18
platform for continuous monitoring and evaluation of public spaces and enable the development of
appropriate interventions and policy decisions. The framework is helpful for the city, state, national
governments, as it helps them identify and prioritise public spaces for improvement and provides a
basis for a data-driven approach to planning and management.
This document presents draft guidelines for the city beauty competition launched by the
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India. Any feedback, comments
and suggestions on these guidelines could be submitted over email to
cbc.asci@gmail.com before 15th
January 2023.

20
5. Annexures
Annexure 1: Composition of independent jury at state and national level
The assessment of all the applications/ nominations received will be done by an independent jury at
state and national levels. The independent jury shall be constituted by the concerned state
governments, whereas the independent jury for national level awards will be constituted by the
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA).
The jury will comprise four experts, including the chair, drawn from any of the following fields:
a. Urban planner/ Urban designer/ landscape architect/ environmental scientist/
conservation architect – Two (2)
b. Traffic Engineer/ Civil Engineer – One (1)
c. Art historian/ artist/ sculptor/ expert on environmental issues – One (1)

21
Annexure 2: Supporting material for submitting the application
Supporting material Details
Presentation by the Applicant
Maximum 15 slides
Format: PDF
File size: 20 MB
File Name:
WARD NAME_CITY
NAME_Intervention 1
1. Ward submission: Rational of interventions in the
locality
2. City submissions: Selection of the Location (Process
and rationale behind site selection)
3. Site Context: City-level plans showing the chosen
site in the broader context
4. Architectural/ Landscape drawings of the entire
site, including all site features such as trees
5. Year of development
6. Site Opportunities and weakness
7. Highlights of the initiatives/activities
8. Social initiatives and awareness campaigns
High resolution images
Format: JPEG, PNG
Maximum file size: 1 MB
each
File Name:
WARD NAME_CITY
NAME_Image 1
Maximum 20 Photos
Geotag the location of intervention and upload the 360-
degree image
Photos document how a place changes and the actions that
bring it to life.
Make sure the images are:
• Of a high resolution (above 1080 pixels)
• Well lit- not too bright, not too dark
• With people actively using the space
A few images that would be good to have include:
• An impactful aerial photo of the design intervention
• Impactful before-after images of the design
intervention from the same
• Vantage point
• Image showing women, children, elderly and other
vulnerable groups using the new design intervention
Video • 1080 p video of max 2 mins

22
Annexure 3: Assessment factors and weightage
Ward level assessment factors
Dimension Assessment Factors
Accessibility
(10%)
1. Access to public transport within 400 m
2. Dedicated parking area for vehicles
3. Footpaths, walkways and cycle tracks
4. Crosswalks at key areas in the ward (near school zones, parks,
hospitals, junctions, roundabouts etc.)
5. Easy access for all - ramps, kerbs (for wheelchairs etc.), bollards,
railings at regular intervals and tactile pathways for the visually
impaired.
6. Signages directing users to public toilets, water points, shops, etc.
Amenities
(15%)
1. Adequate lighting
2. Parks and playground with equipment for outdoor activities.
3. Good quality seating (benches, mobile chairs, wide steps etc.) in
public places.
4. Presence of litter and garbage bins
5. Functional public toilets for all age groups, genders and specially-
abled.
6. Clean drainage network.
7. Parking facility in public spaces
Aesthetics
(50%)
1. Clean, well-maintained water bodies and green spaces.
2. Tree-lined avenues
3. Dedicated vending zones / well-structured markets.
4. Design elements and their upkeep – Painting, murals, fountains,
hanging art, sculptures, vandalism-free walls, electric poles and
billboards
5. Preservation and upkeep of architecturally significant public
buildings
6. Preservation, upkeep and adaptive re-use of architecturally
significant private buildings
Ecology
(15%)
1. Trees of native species
2. Rainwater harvesting in public buildings
3. Energy conservation and use of solar panels in public buildings
4. Plastic free
5. Water bodies with plant and aquatic life

23
6. Waste segregation at the source
7. Treatment of grey water
Activities
(10%)
1. Adequate community activity zones for children.
2. Spaces for health clubs, yoga center, recreational area for women,
public performance (dance/ drama)
3. Multi-sport playing area for youth.
4. Accessible, well-maintained areas for the elderly, differently-
abled, and women with proper amenities for social interaction.
5. Safe streets (no stray animals, well-lit, covered sewer holes, etc.)
6. Back lane management (as community places for women and
children)
7. Organized vegetable vending zones

24
Assessment factors for beautiful public spaces
Green spaces
Dimension Assessment factor
Accessibility
(10%)
1. Connectivity through public transport
2. Easy last-mile connectivity from public transit point
3. Hindrance-free accessibility to green spaces.
4. Signages in the approach area for easy navigation
5. Ramps for differently-abled persons at entry
6. Stray animal restrictions.
Amenities
(15%)
1. Seating facility
2. Toilets/drinking water facility with signages
3. Well-lit precincts
4. Litter bins that are periodically emptied
5. Organized parking
6. Security & surveillance systems
Aesthetics
(50%)
1. Visual appeal from close quarters and from a distance of
uninterrupted green spaces.
2. Well-maintained green spaces
3. Minimum concrete space, maximum use of natural materials
4. Vandalism-free walls, electric poles and billboards
5. Educative, informative design elements (e.g., usage of recycled
plastic, theme-based designs, etc.)
6. Biodiversity zones
7. Design elements - Paintings, murals, fountains, hanging art,
sculptures
Ecology
(15%)
1. Existing trees at the site are retained; Trees planted at the site
are of native species.
2. Allows for areas with native undergrowth and management for
attracting bees, birds etc.
3. Effective rainwater harvesting
4. Energy efficient -sensitively placed solar panels – outside green
spaces
5. Leaf litter is retained in designated areas
6. Park is plastic free
7. Signage for trees/ plants

25
8. Recycling of leaves to improve the quality of soil and measures
such as composting/ vermicomposting
9. Soil conservation efforts to promote microbial life, insects and
worms that sustain soil
10. Water bodies with plant and aquatic life
Activities
(10%)
1. Park attracts a diversity of visitors – with varied interests.
2. Designed spaces are well utilised by visitor groups for activities
such as Fitness activities/ walking, yoga, Open air gym, playing
area, cycling facilities
3. Cultural performances and activities
Waterfront
Dimension Assessment factors
Accessibility
(10%)
1. Easy connectivity with public transport
2. Organized signages and centrally located way finders
3. Pedestrian-friendly and encroachment-free roads and streets
leading to water bodies
4. Waterfront zone free from encroachments
Amenities
(15%)
1. Quality lighting
2. Public seating facility
3. Vending zones
4. Public toilet/ drinking water points
5. Information Boards for safety, security and alertness
6. Security infrastructure, including lifeguards.
Aesthetics
(50%)
1. Visual appeal from close quarters and from a distance
2. Popularity as evidenced by footfall
3. Periodic cleaning of the water body, litter-removal
4. Elements like small wooden bridges & platforms to promote
closer human interface with water
Ecology
(15%)
1. Waterbody supporting habitat for aquatic life (flowering plants,
fishes, fishing birds)
2. Ecological management of surrounding green spaces
3. Plastic free
4. Signage for trees/ plants
5. No discharge of untreated effluents or sewage or grey water into
the water bodies
6. Water quality is monitored and kept clean through aeration and
other natural means and without chemicals.

26
7. Water bodies free of hyacinth and algae
Activities
(10%)
1. Unless an environmentally protected area, provision for Water
sports, boating
2. Entertainment, food, recreational activities
3. Spaces for street performers, open art galleries, public
gatherings, etc.
Tourist/Heritage
Accessibility
(10%)
1. Easy connectivity with public transport
2. Pedestrian-friendly and encroachment-free roads/pathways and
streets leading to water bodies
3. Organized signages and centrally located way finders
4. Parking is available for visitor cars and buses.
Amenities
(15%)
1. For major heritage sites, well-established and managed tourist
guides systems are in place.
2. Availability of drinking water/toilets
3. Seating facilities
4. Heritage Plaques with description/ history of the precincts
5. Proper ticketing systems with ease of payment
6. Wi-Fi/ phone networks are available
7. Security infrastructure is available
Aesthetics
(50%)
1. Visual appeal from close quarters and from a distance of the
heritage asset evoking its glorious history. Its original state is
discernible to visitors
2. Preservation/conservation/rejuvenation/revitalisation of the
historic structures/precincts and natural elements
3. Popularity as evidenced by footfall
4. Free from plastic, litter and vandalism of walls/ advertisements,
etc.
5. Design elements - Paintings, murals, fountains, hanging art,
sculptures.
Ecology
(15%)
1. Maintenance of green spaces and water-bodies in an
ecologically sensitive manner
2. Green space planted with native tree species.
3. Allows for areas with native undergrowth and planting and
management for attracting bees, birds and butterflies
4. Effective rainwater harvesting systems

27
5. Portions of the site are used to create urban forests
6. Measures such as composting/ vermicomposting
7. Site is plastic free
8. Signage for trees and plants are installed
Activities
(10%)
1. Organized periodic events such as Heritage walks.
2. Site Interpretation through exhibitions/ digital content is
available to visitors.
3. Where permitted, a café for visitors
4. Dedicated spaces for street performers, open art galleries,
public gatherings, and recreational spaces.
Market/Commercial spaces
Accessibility
(10 %)
1. Layout – easy entry/exit.
2. Proximity/availability of public transport
3. Dedicated parking area for private vehicles (including parking
reserved for people with women and people with special needs)
4. Ramps and curbs for easy accessibility of specially-abled.
Amenities
(15 %)
1. Signages for public toilets, water points, shops, etc., located at
required places
2. Adequate lighting
3. Public conveniences
4. Public seating area
5. Periodic garbage removal and segregation at the source
6. Dedicated parking area for vehicles
7. Footpaths/ walkways
Aesthetics
(50 %)
1. Visual appeal of orderliness from close quarters and from a
distance of an orderly, well-spaced out, un-cluttered market,
vibrant, colorful market
2. Architectural design considers the massing of the building
blocks and incorporates landscape design.
3. Traditional Indian architectural elements are incorporated into
the design.
4. Uniformity of design of signages and shops
5. Free from defacement and litter
6. Design elements – Painting, murals, fountains, etc.
7. Green spaces and water-bodies in the market place
8. Organized electrical lines or underground electrical system

28
Ecology
(15%)
1. Active surveillance elements like guards, CCTV, etc.]
2. Energy consumption is monitored and reduced with the help of
advanced building systems and AI.
3. Open/ green space is planted with native tree species.
4. Green rooftops wherever possible
5. Effective rainwater harvesting systems
6. Site is plastic free
7. Waste segregation at the source
Activities
(10%)
1. Treatment of greywater
2. Entertainment, food, recreational activities
3. Organized periodic events (Food, music, culture, arts, health
drives, melas, etc.)

Nirman Bhawan
New Delhi - 110011
Knowledge partner
Administrative Staff College of India
Bella Vista, Raj Bhavan Road, Khairtabad
Hyderabad, Telangana - 500082

CBC 2022_FinalDraftGuidlines_Design.pdf

More Related Content

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured (20)

CBC 2022_FinalDraftGuidlines_Design.pdf