CCXG Global Forum October 2018 Summary Slides Breakout Groups A and D
0 likes93 views
1. The document summarizes key discussions from breakout groups at an OECD climate change expert group meeting regarding tracking progress on climate actions and reviewing technical reports. 2. There was general agreement that indicators to track progress in implementing climate commitments should be consistent with those used to track achievement of commitments. Methodological consistency in reporting was also deemed important. 3. Reviews of technical reports could support continuous improvements, with guidance and priorities for enhancing clarity and information sharing. An effective review system would need to handle larger report volumes as climate actions increase.
CCXG Global Forum October 2018 Summary Slides Breakout Groups A and D
- 1. Climate Change Expert Group www.oecd.org/env/cc/ccxg.htm Breakout Group A: Information needed to track progress towards (I)NDCs: relevant linkages and potential challenges OECD Conference Centre, Paris 8 October 2018 Wifi network: “OECD hotspot” (no password)
- 2. 2 Climate Change Expert Group Key takeaways 1. Common elements in reporting on tracking progress can be defined at general level 2. Common understanding that different information can be provided at different stages in the reporting – important to ensure consistent flow of information from beginning to end of NDC 3. General agreement that indicators are nationally determined; convergence on the view that indicators to track progress made in implementing should be the same as the indicators used to track progress made in achieving NDCs. 4. Methodological consistency was considered to be important for flow of information
- 3. Climate Change Expert Group www.oecd.org/env/cc/ccxg.htm Breakout Group D: Technical Expert Review: relevant experience and options OECD Conference Centre, Paris 8 October 2018 Wifi network: “OECD hotspot” (no password)
- 4. 4 Climate Change Expert Group Key takeaways Reviews strongly supported continuous improvements of the reports and setting of priorities for improvements and also supported clarity of information towards the outside world Review needs clear reporting guidance as a basis Important to design effective review system that is able to deal with larger number of reports, different suggestions how this can be implemented