SlideShare a Scribd company logo
CHAPTER II
CLASSIFICATION
OF
BACTERIA
 Bacteria are classified and identified to distinguish one
organism from another and to group similar organisms
by criteria of interest to microbiologists or other
scientists.
Approaches to Taxonomy
1. Numerical Approach
 In numerical taxonomy (also called computer or phenetic
taxonomy) many (50 to 200) biochemical, morphological,
and cultural characteristics, as well as susceptibilities to
antibiotics and inorganic compounds, are used to
determine the degree of similarity between organisms.
 In numerical studies, investigators often calculate the
coefficient of similarity or percentage of similarity
between strains (where strain indicates a single isolate
from a specimen).
 A dendrogram or a similarity matrix is constructed that
joins individual strains into groups and places one group
with other groups on the basis of their percentage of
similarity.
Figure :1.Example of dendogram
2. Phylogenetic Approach
 The ideal means of identifying and classifying bacteria
would be to compare each gene sequence in a given
strain with the gene sequences for every known species.
 This cannot be done, but the total DNA of one organism
can be compared with that of any other organism by a
method called nucleic acid hybridization or DNA
hybridization.
 This method can be used to measure the number of
DNA sequences that any two organisms have in
common and to estimate the percentage of divergence
within DNA sequences that are related but not identical.
 DNA relatedness studies have been done for yeasts,
viruses, bacteriophages, and many groups of bacteria.
 Five factors can be used to determine DNA relatedness:
 Genome size,
 Guanine-plus-cytosine (G+C) content,
 DNA relatedness under conditions optimal for DNA
reassociation,
 thermal stability of related DNA sequences, and
 DNA relatedness under conditions supraoptimal for
DNA reassociation.
 Genome Size
 True bacterial DNAs have genome sizes (measured as
molecular weight) between 1 X 109 and 8 X 109.
 Genome size determinations sometimes can distinguish
between groups.
 They were used to distinguish Legionella pneumophila (the
legionnaire's disease bacterium) from Bartonella (Rickettsia)
quintana, the agent of trench fever. L pneumophila has a
genome size of about 3 X 109; that of B quintana is about 1
X 109.
 Guanine-plus-Cytosine Content
 The G+C content in bacterial DNA ranges from about
25 to 75 percent. This percentage is specific, but not
exclusive, for a species; two strains with a similar
G+C content may or may not belong to the same
species. If the G+C contents are very different,
however, the strains cannot be members of the same
species.
 DNA Relatedness under Conditions Optimal for DNA
Reassociation
DNA relatedness is determined by allowing single-
stranded DNA from one strain to reassociate with
single-stranded DNA from a second strain, to form a
double-stranded DNA molecule (Figure).
This is a specific, temperature-dependent reaction.
The optimal temperature for DNA reassociation is 25
to 30°C below the temperature at which native
double-stranded DNA denatures into single strands.
 Many studies indicate that a bacterial species is
composed of strains that are 70 to 100 percent related.
 In contrast, relatedness between different species is 0 to
about 65 percent.
 It is important to emphasize that the term "related" does
not mean "identical" or "homologous."
 Similar but non identical nucleic acid sequences can re-
associate.
Fig. Diagram of DNA reassociation.
3. Polyphasic Approach
 In practice, the approach to bacterial taxonomy should
be polyphasic.
 The first step is phenotypic grouping of strains by
morphological, biochemical and any other
characteristics of interest.
 The phenotypic groups are then tested for DNA
relatedness to determine whether the observed
phenotypic homogeneity (or heterogeneity) is reflected
by phylogenetic homogeneity or heterogeneity.
 The third and most important step is re examination of
the biochemical characteristics of the DNA relatedness
groups.
 This allows determination of the biochemical borders of
each group and determination of reactions of diagnostic
value for the group.
 For identification of a given organism, the importance of
specific tests is weighted on the basis of correlation with
DNA results.
 Occasionally, the reactions commonly used will not
distinguish completely between two distinct DNA
relatedness groups.
 In these cases, other biochemical tests of diagnostic
value must be sought.
Fig. Bacterial identification.
Phenotypic Characteristics Useful in Classification and
Identification
 Morphologic Characteristics
 Both wet-mounted and properly stained bacterial cell
suspensions can yield a great deal of information.
 These simple tests can indicate the Gram reaction of
the organism; whether it is acid-fast; its motility; the
arrangement of its flagella; the presence of spores,
capsules, and inclusion bodies; and, of course, its
shape.
 This information often can allow identification of an
organism to the genus level, or can minimize the
possibility that it belongs to one or another group.
 Colony characteristics and pigmentation are also quite
helpful.
 For example, colonies of several Porphyromonas
species auto fluoresce under long-wavelength ultraviolet
light, and Proteus species swarm on appropriate media.
 Growth Characteristics
 A primary distinguishing characteristic is whether an organism
grows aerobically, anaerobically, facultatively (i.e., in either the
presence or absence of oxygen), or microaerobically (i.e., in the
presence of a less than atmospheric partial pressure of oxygen).
 The proper atmospheric conditions are essential for isolating and
identifying bacteria.
 Other important growth assessments include the incubation
temperature, pH, nutrients required, and resistance to antibiotics.
 Antigens and Phage Susceptibility
Cell wall (O), flagellar (H), and capsular (K) antigens are
used to aid in classifying certain organisms at the species
level, to serotype strains of medically important species for
epidemiologic purposes, or to identify serotypes of public
health importance. Serotyping is also sometimes used to
distinguish strains of exceptional virulence or public health
importance, for example with V cholerae (O1 is the
pandemic strain) and E coli (enterotoxigenic, enteroinvasive,
enterohemorrhagic, and enteropathogenic serotypes).
 Biochemical Characteristics
Most bacteria are identified and classified largely on the
basis of their reactions in a series of biochemical tests.
Some tests are used routinely for many groups of
bacteria (oxidase, nitrate reduction, amino acid
degrading enzymes, fermentation or utilization of
carbohydrates); others are restricted to a single family,
genus, or species (coagulase test for staphylococci,
pyrrolidonyl arylamidase test for Gram-positive cocci).
 Both the number of tests needed and the actual tests
used for identification vary from one group of organisms
to another.
 Therefore, the lengths to which a laboratory should go in
detecting and identifying organisms must be decided in
each laboratory on the basis of its function, the type of
population it serves, and its resources.
Classification below Species Level
 Below the Species Level
 Particularly for epidemiological purposes, clinical
microbiologists must distinguish strains with particular
traits from other strains in the same species.
 For example, serotype O157:H7 E coli are identified in
stool specimens because of their association with bloody
diarrhea and subsequent hemolytic uremic syndrome.
 Below the species level, strains are designated as groups
or types on the basis of common serologic or biochemical
reactions, phage or bacteriocin sensitivity, pathogenicity,
or other characteristics.
 serotype, phage type, colicin type, biotype, bioserotype (a
group of strains from the same species with common
biochemical and serologic characteristics that set them
apart from other members of the species), and pathotype
(e.g., toxigenic Clostridium difficile, invasive E coli, and
toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae).
MICROBIAL CLASSIFICATION AND CELLS
 Since Aristotle’s time, naturalists have attempted to classify and
name plants, animals, and microorganisms in a meaningful way,
on the basis of their appearance and behavior. Thus the
science of taxonomy (biological classification) was devised
based on the binomial system developed in the 18th century.
 In binomial system, each organism is given two names. ( eg.
homo sapiens for humans ) The first is the genus or genera
(plural) and the second is the species.
 Each organism is categorized in to larger groups based
on their similarities and difference.
 According to the presently popular classification scheme,
all the living (and extinct) organisms can be placed in
five kingdoms
 Since written reference is often made to genera and
species, biologists have adopted a standard method of
expressing these names that identify a specific organism.
 To express genus capitalize the fist letter of the word and
underline or italicize it for example Esherchia. To express
genus and species together, capitalize the first letter of the
genus name (and then underline or in italicize the entire
name- for example Eschelchia coli. The genes can be
abbreviated as E.coli
Eukaryotic and Prokaryotic cells
 Prokaryotic cell
(Pro -means primitive)
( Karyote - means nucleus)
 Prokaryotic cells are less complex cells. Which posses
naked (unbound) DNA with out associated basic
proteins, they divide by binary fission are bounded by a
semi rigid cell wall.
 The prokaryotic cells include bacteria and cyanobacteria
(blue- green algae.)
Fig. Prokaryotic cell
 Eukaryotic cells.
(Eu- means true,
(Karyote- means nucleus)
 The Eukaryotic cell is more complex, has membrane
bound nucleus, and many organells.
 Eukaryotic cells include protozoa, fungi, algae, (green,
brown and red algae) and plant and animal cells.
Fig. Eukaryotic cell
 Viruses: are composed of only a few genes protected by
a protein coat, a few enzymes and little other material
and depend on the energy and metabolic machinery of
the host cell to live and reproduce.
 There fore, because they are not truly viable cells, they
are usually, placed in a completely separate category
and are not classified with the simple prokaryotic cells.
CLASSIFICATION OF BACTERIA
 Bacteria are classified in to 19 different categories in
Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 8th
(1974), and the classification is based on
1. Morphology 8. Amino acid sequencing of proteins
2. Staining 9. Genetic composition
3. Motility
4. Growth
5. Nutritional requirement
6. Bio chemical and metabolic activity
7. Pathogenecity
Morphology: - Bacteria vary widely in size, ranging from
0.2 um to 10um long
-There are there basic shapes
1. Spherical or coccoid/cocci- (singular –coccus)
2. Rods or bacilli (singular - bacillus)
3. Spirals or spirilla (Singular - Spirillum)
A B C
Fig . Different bacterial morphologies A. Cocci, B. Bacilli, C. Spiral
shape
 The cells of cocci may be found in various arrangements
depending on the species and the way they divide
e.g – Micrococcus:-Cocci occurring single.
- Diplococci- Pairs of cocci
- Strepto cocci – Cocci in chain
- Staphylococci- Cocci in cluster
- Tetrads – Four cocci as in box
- Octads – Eight cocci as in box
 Bacilli (rods) may be short or long, thick or thin, pointed
or with blunt ends,
- Some rods resemble cocci and are often called
coccobalilli because they are very short small bacilli.
- Some bacilli stack up next to each other eg. Diphteroids,
Some are coma shaped e.g. V.cholara
 Spiralls usually occur singly.
-The different species of spirilla varies in size, length,
rigidity, number and amplitude of their coils.
Fig. different bacterial arrangements

More Related Content

PPT
Classification of bacteria.ppt
PPT
[Micro] classification of prokaryotes
PPTX
Classification of microorganisms
PDF
Bacterial Taxonomy for B.Sc. 1st year students
PDF
Bacterial taxonomy
PDF
Bacterial taxonomy
PDF
Bacterial Taxonomy.pdf
PPTX
Bacterial taxonomy by Dr. Himanshu Khatri
Classification of bacteria.ppt
[Micro] classification of prokaryotes
Classification of microorganisms
Bacterial Taxonomy for B.Sc. 1st year students
Bacterial taxonomy
Bacterial taxonomy
Bacterial Taxonomy.pdf
Bacterial taxonomy by Dr. Himanshu Khatri

Similar to Chapter II Classification of bacteria.ppt (20)

PPT
Bacterial taxonomy
 
PPTX
Bacterialtaxonomypixel copy2-131001071958-phpapp01 (1)
PPTX
Lecture 2.pptxAAAAAAA..........................................................
PPTX
Microbial taxonomy
PPT
Classification of Enterobacteriaceae family
PPTX
8 chapter 10 a survey of the microbial world
PPTX
Mbp 02 microbial taxonomy classification
PPTX
Bacterial taxonomy, pixel copy (2)
PPTX
Bacterial taxonomy.pptx
PPTX
Nomenclature, classification and identification of bacteria by Anil Shrestha
PPTX
Classification of Bacteria.pptx
PPT
Classification of microorganisms lecture note by rm patel
PPT
Classification of microorganisms lecture note by rm patel
PPT
1.2-Classification of bacthhhf fteria(0).ppt
PPTX
Nomenclature and classification of microorganisms - 2021
PPTX
Introduction to prokaryotes Introduction to prokaryotes
PPTX
Taxonomy of prokaryotes
PDF
Bacterial taxonomy & classification
PDF
Bacterial-Classification.pdf
Bacterial taxonomy
 
Bacterialtaxonomypixel copy2-131001071958-phpapp01 (1)
Lecture 2.pptxAAAAAAA..........................................................
Microbial taxonomy
Classification of Enterobacteriaceae family
8 chapter 10 a survey of the microbial world
Mbp 02 microbial taxonomy classification
Bacterial taxonomy, pixel copy (2)
Bacterial taxonomy.pptx
Nomenclature, classification and identification of bacteria by Anil Shrestha
Classification of Bacteria.pptx
Classification of microorganisms lecture note by rm patel
Classification of microorganisms lecture note by rm patel
1.2-Classification of bacthhhf fteria(0).ppt
Nomenclature and classification of microorganisms - 2021
Introduction to prokaryotes Introduction to prokaryotes
Taxonomy of prokaryotes
Bacterial taxonomy & classification
Bacterial-Classification.pdf
Ad

More from seraphimkassa (9)

PPTX
Overview of vigjjhhgghi is 8jto iuuurology.pptx
PPTX
Introduction togjhghjhgggjjh PH for_PCI.pptx
PPTX
01A.Protein Metabyyyyyyyggohism ppt.pptx
PPTX
1.3. Bacterial Growth and Nutrition-2024.pptx
PDF
introduction and cell injury hh GI by it th
PPTX
aaGeneral pharmayuuuuuyyjhuucofhjlogy.pptx
PDF
Global Trend CHAPTER ONE jjjiiiuyy I iuyy.pdf
PDF
Global Affairs Lecture Notes 5 (Chapter 1).pdf
PPTX
A2☀️. Global Trends, Chapter 2 new-1 (1).pptx
Overview of vigjjhhgghi is 8jto iuuurology.pptx
Introduction togjhghjhgggjjh PH for_PCI.pptx
01A.Protein Metabyyyyyyyggohism ppt.pptx
1.3. Bacterial Growth and Nutrition-2024.pptx
introduction and cell injury hh GI by it th
aaGeneral pharmayuuuuuyyjhuucofhjlogy.pptx
Global Trend CHAPTER ONE jjjiiiuyy I iuyy.pdf
Global Affairs Lecture Notes 5 (Chapter 1).pdf
A2☀️. Global Trends, Chapter 2 new-1 (1).pptx
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
STEEL- intro-1.pptxhejwjenwnwnenemwmwmwm
PDF
PPT Determiners.pdf.......................
PPTX
Presentacion compuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
PPTX
quadraticequations-111211090004-phpapp02.pptx
PPTX
material for studying about lift elevators escalation
PPTX
Lecture-3-Computer-programming for BS InfoTech
PPTX
PLC ANALOGUE DONE BY KISMEC KULIM TD 5 .0
PPTX
title _yeOPC_Poisoning_Presentation.pptx
PPTX
5. MEASURE OF INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR- MATATAG CURRICULUM.pptx
PPT
Lines and angles cbse class 9 math chemistry
PPTX
making presentation that do no stick.pptx
PPTX
KVL KCL ppt electrical electronics eee tiet
PPTX
了解新西兰毕业证(Wintec毕业证书)怀卡托理工学院毕业证存档可查的
DOCX
A PROPOSAL ON IoT climate sensor 2.docx
PPTX
Embeded System for Artificial intelligence 2.pptx
PPT
FABRICATION OF MOS FET BJT DEVICES IN NANOMETER
PPTX
Computers and mobile device: Evaluating options for home and work
PPTX
Sem-8 project ppt fortvfvmat uyyjhuj.pptx
PPTX
ERP good ERP good ERP good ERP good good ERP good ERP good
PPTX
Prograce_Present.....ggation_Simple.pptx
STEEL- intro-1.pptxhejwjenwnwnenemwmwmwm
PPT Determiners.pdf.......................
Presentacion compuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
quadraticequations-111211090004-phpapp02.pptx
material for studying about lift elevators escalation
Lecture-3-Computer-programming for BS InfoTech
PLC ANALOGUE DONE BY KISMEC KULIM TD 5 .0
title _yeOPC_Poisoning_Presentation.pptx
5. MEASURE OF INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR- MATATAG CURRICULUM.pptx
Lines and angles cbse class 9 math chemistry
making presentation that do no stick.pptx
KVL KCL ppt electrical electronics eee tiet
了解新西兰毕业证(Wintec毕业证书)怀卡托理工学院毕业证存档可查的
A PROPOSAL ON IoT climate sensor 2.docx
Embeded System for Artificial intelligence 2.pptx
FABRICATION OF MOS FET BJT DEVICES IN NANOMETER
Computers and mobile device: Evaluating options for home and work
Sem-8 project ppt fortvfvmat uyyjhuj.pptx
ERP good ERP good ERP good ERP good good ERP good ERP good
Prograce_Present.....ggation_Simple.pptx

Chapter II Classification of bacteria.ppt

  • 2.  Bacteria are classified and identified to distinguish one organism from another and to group similar organisms by criteria of interest to microbiologists or other scientists.
  • 3. Approaches to Taxonomy 1. Numerical Approach  In numerical taxonomy (also called computer or phenetic taxonomy) many (50 to 200) biochemical, morphological, and cultural characteristics, as well as susceptibilities to antibiotics and inorganic compounds, are used to determine the degree of similarity between organisms.
  • 4.  In numerical studies, investigators often calculate the coefficient of similarity or percentage of similarity between strains (where strain indicates a single isolate from a specimen).  A dendrogram or a similarity matrix is constructed that joins individual strains into groups and places one group with other groups on the basis of their percentage of similarity.
  • 6. 2. Phylogenetic Approach  The ideal means of identifying and classifying bacteria would be to compare each gene sequence in a given strain with the gene sequences for every known species.  This cannot be done, but the total DNA of one organism can be compared with that of any other organism by a method called nucleic acid hybridization or DNA hybridization.
  • 7.  This method can be used to measure the number of DNA sequences that any two organisms have in common and to estimate the percentage of divergence within DNA sequences that are related but not identical.  DNA relatedness studies have been done for yeasts, viruses, bacteriophages, and many groups of bacteria.
  • 8.  Five factors can be used to determine DNA relatedness:  Genome size,  Guanine-plus-cytosine (G+C) content,  DNA relatedness under conditions optimal for DNA reassociation,  thermal stability of related DNA sequences, and  DNA relatedness under conditions supraoptimal for DNA reassociation.
  • 9.  Genome Size  True bacterial DNAs have genome sizes (measured as molecular weight) between 1 X 109 and 8 X 109.  Genome size determinations sometimes can distinguish between groups.  They were used to distinguish Legionella pneumophila (the legionnaire's disease bacterium) from Bartonella (Rickettsia) quintana, the agent of trench fever. L pneumophila has a genome size of about 3 X 109; that of B quintana is about 1 X 109.
  • 10.  Guanine-plus-Cytosine Content  The G+C content in bacterial DNA ranges from about 25 to 75 percent. This percentage is specific, but not exclusive, for a species; two strains with a similar G+C content may or may not belong to the same species. If the G+C contents are very different, however, the strains cannot be members of the same species.
  • 11.  DNA Relatedness under Conditions Optimal for DNA Reassociation DNA relatedness is determined by allowing single- stranded DNA from one strain to reassociate with single-stranded DNA from a second strain, to form a double-stranded DNA molecule (Figure). This is a specific, temperature-dependent reaction. The optimal temperature for DNA reassociation is 25 to 30°C below the temperature at which native double-stranded DNA denatures into single strands.
  • 12.  Many studies indicate that a bacterial species is composed of strains that are 70 to 100 percent related.  In contrast, relatedness between different species is 0 to about 65 percent.  It is important to emphasize that the term "related" does not mean "identical" or "homologous."  Similar but non identical nucleic acid sequences can re- associate.
  • 13. Fig. Diagram of DNA reassociation.
  • 14. 3. Polyphasic Approach  In practice, the approach to bacterial taxonomy should be polyphasic.  The first step is phenotypic grouping of strains by morphological, biochemical and any other characteristics of interest.  The phenotypic groups are then tested for DNA relatedness to determine whether the observed phenotypic homogeneity (or heterogeneity) is reflected by phylogenetic homogeneity or heterogeneity.
  • 15.  The third and most important step is re examination of the biochemical characteristics of the DNA relatedness groups.  This allows determination of the biochemical borders of each group and determination of reactions of diagnostic value for the group.  For identification of a given organism, the importance of specific tests is weighted on the basis of correlation with DNA results.
  • 16.  Occasionally, the reactions commonly used will not distinguish completely between two distinct DNA relatedness groups.  In these cases, other biochemical tests of diagnostic value must be sought.
  • 18. Phenotypic Characteristics Useful in Classification and Identification  Morphologic Characteristics  Both wet-mounted and properly stained bacterial cell suspensions can yield a great deal of information.  These simple tests can indicate the Gram reaction of the organism; whether it is acid-fast; its motility; the arrangement of its flagella; the presence of spores, capsules, and inclusion bodies; and, of course, its shape.
  • 19.  This information often can allow identification of an organism to the genus level, or can minimize the possibility that it belongs to one or another group.  Colony characteristics and pigmentation are also quite helpful.  For example, colonies of several Porphyromonas species auto fluoresce under long-wavelength ultraviolet light, and Proteus species swarm on appropriate media.
  • 20.  Growth Characteristics  A primary distinguishing characteristic is whether an organism grows aerobically, anaerobically, facultatively (i.e., in either the presence or absence of oxygen), or microaerobically (i.e., in the presence of a less than atmospheric partial pressure of oxygen).  The proper atmospheric conditions are essential for isolating and identifying bacteria.  Other important growth assessments include the incubation temperature, pH, nutrients required, and resistance to antibiotics.
  • 21.  Antigens and Phage Susceptibility Cell wall (O), flagellar (H), and capsular (K) antigens are used to aid in classifying certain organisms at the species level, to serotype strains of medically important species for epidemiologic purposes, or to identify serotypes of public health importance. Serotyping is also sometimes used to distinguish strains of exceptional virulence or public health importance, for example with V cholerae (O1 is the pandemic strain) and E coli (enterotoxigenic, enteroinvasive, enterohemorrhagic, and enteropathogenic serotypes).
  • 22.  Biochemical Characteristics Most bacteria are identified and classified largely on the basis of their reactions in a series of biochemical tests. Some tests are used routinely for many groups of bacteria (oxidase, nitrate reduction, amino acid degrading enzymes, fermentation or utilization of carbohydrates); others are restricted to a single family, genus, or species (coagulase test for staphylococci, pyrrolidonyl arylamidase test for Gram-positive cocci).
  • 23.  Both the number of tests needed and the actual tests used for identification vary from one group of organisms to another.  Therefore, the lengths to which a laboratory should go in detecting and identifying organisms must be decided in each laboratory on the basis of its function, the type of population it serves, and its resources.
  • 24. Classification below Species Level  Below the Species Level  Particularly for epidemiological purposes, clinical microbiologists must distinguish strains with particular traits from other strains in the same species.  For example, serotype O157:H7 E coli are identified in stool specimens because of their association with bloody diarrhea and subsequent hemolytic uremic syndrome.
  • 25.  Below the species level, strains are designated as groups or types on the basis of common serologic or biochemical reactions, phage or bacteriocin sensitivity, pathogenicity, or other characteristics.  serotype, phage type, colicin type, biotype, bioserotype (a group of strains from the same species with common biochemical and serologic characteristics that set them apart from other members of the species), and pathotype (e.g., toxigenic Clostridium difficile, invasive E coli, and toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae).
  • 26. MICROBIAL CLASSIFICATION AND CELLS  Since Aristotle’s time, naturalists have attempted to classify and name plants, animals, and microorganisms in a meaningful way, on the basis of their appearance and behavior. Thus the science of taxonomy (biological classification) was devised based on the binomial system developed in the 18th century.  In binomial system, each organism is given two names. ( eg. homo sapiens for humans ) The first is the genus or genera (plural) and the second is the species.
  • 27.  Each organism is categorized in to larger groups based on their similarities and difference.  According to the presently popular classification scheme, all the living (and extinct) organisms can be placed in five kingdoms
  • 28.  Since written reference is often made to genera and species, biologists have adopted a standard method of expressing these names that identify a specific organism.  To express genus capitalize the fist letter of the word and underline or italicize it for example Esherchia. To express genus and species together, capitalize the first letter of the genus name (and then underline or in italicize the entire name- for example Eschelchia coli. The genes can be abbreviated as E.coli
  • 29. Eukaryotic and Prokaryotic cells  Prokaryotic cell (Pro -means primitive) ( Karyote - means nucleus)  Prokaryotic cells are less complex cells. Which posses naked (unbound) DNA with out associated basic proteins, they divide by binary fission are bounded by a semi rigid cell wall.  The prokaryotic cells include bacteria and cyanobacteria (blue- green algae.)
  • 31.  Eukaryotic cells. (Eu- means true, (Karyote- means nucleus)  The Eukaryotic cell is more complex, has membrane bound nucleus, and many organells.  Eukaryotic cells include protozoa, fungi, algae, (green, brown and red algae) and plant and animal cells.
  • 33.  Viruses: are composed of only a few genes protected by a protein coat, a few enzymes and little other material and depend on the energy and metabolic machinery of the host cell to live and reproduce.  There fore, because they are not truly viable cells, they are usually, placed in a completely separate category and are not classified with the simple prokaryotic cells.
  • 34. CLASSIFICATION OF BACTERIA  Bacteria are classified in to 19 different categories in Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 8th (1974), and the classification is based on 1. Morphology 8. Amino acid sequencing of proteins 2. Staining 9. Genetic composition 3. Motility 4. Growth 5. Nutritional requirement 6. Bio chemical and metabolic activity 7. Pathogenecity
  • 35. Morphology: - Bacteria vary widely in size, ranging from 0.2 um to 10um long -There are there basic shapes 1. Spherical or coccoid/cocci- (singular –coccus) 2. Rods or bacilli (singular - bacillus) 3. Spirals or spirilla (Singular - Spirillum)
  • 36. A B C Fig . Different bacterial morphologies A. Cocci, B. Bacilli, C. Spiral shape
  • 37.  The cells of cocci may be found in various arrangements depending on the species and the way they divide e.g – Micrococcus:-Cocci occurring single. - Diplococci- Pairs of cocci - Strepto cocci – Cocci in chain - Staphylococci- Cocci in cluster - Tetrads – Four cocci as in box - Octads – Eight cocci as in box
  • 38.  Bacilli (rods) may be short or long, thick or thin, pointed or with blunt ends, - Some rods resemble cocci and are often called coccobalilli because they are very short small bacilli. - Some bacilli stack up next to each other eg. Diphteroids, Some are coma shaped e.g. V.cholara
  • 39.  Spiralls usually occur singly. -The different species of spirilla varies in size, length, rigidity, number and amplitude of their coils.
  • 40. Fig. different bacterial arrangements

Editor's Notes

  • #3: Approaches to Taxonomy Numerical Approach In their studies on members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, Edwards and Ewing established the following principles to characterize, classify, and identify organisms (Lennette et al., 1985): Classification and identification of an organism should be based on its overall morphologic and biochemical pattern. A single characteristic (pathogenicity, host range, or biochemical reaction), regardless of its importance, is not a sufficient basis for classifying or identifying an organism. A large and diverse strain sample must be tested to determine accurately the biochemical characteristics used to distinguish a given species. Atypical strains often are perfectly typical members of a given biogroup within an existing species, but sometimes they are typical members of an unrecognized new species. In numerical taxonomy (also called computer or phenetic taxonomy) many (50 to 200) biochemical, morphological, and cultural characteristics, as well as susceptibilities to antibiotics and inorganic compounds, are used to determine the degree of similarity between organisms. In numerical studies, investigators often calculate the coefficient of similarity or percentage of similarity between strains (where strain indicates a single isolate from a specimen). A dendrogram or a similarity matrix is constructed that joins individual strains into groups and places one group with other groups on the basis of their percentage of similarity. In the dendrogram in Figure 3-1, group 1 represents three Citrobacter freundii strains that are about 95 percent similar and join with a fourth C freundii strain at the level of 90 percent similarity. Group 2 is composed of three Citrobacter diversus strains that are 95 percent similar, and group 3 contains two E coli strains that are 95 percent similar, as well as a third E coli strain to which they are 90 percent similar. Similarity between groups 1 and 2 occurs at the 70 percent level, and group 3 is about 50 percent similar to groups 1 and 2. In some cases, certain characteristics may be weighted more heavily; for example, the presence of spores in Clostridium might be weighted more heavily than the organism's ability to use a specific carbon source. A given level of similarity can be equated with relatedness at the genus, species, and, sometimes, subspecies levels. For instance, strains of a given species may cluster at a 90% similarity level, species within a given genus may cluster at the 70 percent level, and different genera in the same family may cluster at the 50 percent or lower level (Fig. 3-1). When this approach is the only basis for defining a species, it is difficult to know how many and which tests should be chosen; whether and how the tests should be weighted; and what level of similarity should be chosen to reflect relatedness at the genus and species levels. Most bacteria have enough DNA to specify some 1,500 to 6,000 average-sized genes. Therefore, even a battery of 300 tests would assay only 5 to 20 percent of the genetic potential of a bacterium. Tests that are comparatively simple to conduct (such as those for carbohydrate utilization and for enzymes, presence of which can be assayed colorimetrically) are performed more often than tests for structural, reproductive, and regulatory genes, presence of which is difficult to assay. Thus, major differences may go undetected. Other types of errors may occur when species are classified solely on the basis of phenotype. For example, different enzymes (specified by different genes) may catalyze the same reaction. Also, even if a metabolic gene is functional, negative reactions can occur because of the inability of the substrate to enter the cell, because of a mutation in a regulatory gene, or by production of an inactive protein. There is not necessarily a one-to one correlation between a reaction and the number of genes needed to carry out that reaction. For instance, six enzymatic steps may be involved in a given pathway. If an assay for the end product is performed, a positive reaction indicates the presence of all six enzymes, whereas a negative reaction can mean the absence or non function of one to six enzymes. Several other strain characteristics can affect phenotypic characterization; these include growth rate, incubation temperature, salt requirement, and pH. Plasmids that carry metabolic genes can enable strains to carry out reactions atypical for strains of that species. The same set of "definitive" reactions cannot be used to classify all groups of organisms, and there is no standard number of specific reactions that allows identification of a species. Organisms are identified on the basis of phenotype, but, from the taxonomic standpoint, definition of species solely on this basis is subject to error.
  • #5: Figure1, group 1 represents three Citrobacter freundii strains that are about 95 percent similar and join with a fourth C freundii strain at the level of 90 percent similarity. Group 2 is composed of three Citrobacter diversus strains that are 95 percent similar, and group 3 contains two E coli strains that are 95 percent similar, as well as a third E coli strain to which they are 90 percent similar. Similarity between groups 1 and 2 occurs at the 70 percent level, and group 3 is about 50 percent similar to groups 1 and 2. When this approach is the only basis for defining a species, it is difficult to know how many and which tests should be chosen; whether and how the tests should be weighted; and what level of similarity should be chosen to reflect relatedness at the genus and species levels. Most bacteria have enough DNA to specify some 1,500 to 6,000 average-sized genes. Therefore, even a battery of 300 tests would assay only 5 to 20 percent of the genetic potential of a bacterium. Tests that are comparatively simple to conduct (such as those for carbohydrate utilization and for enzymes, presence of which can be assayed colorimetrically) are performed more often than tests for structural, reproductive, and regulatory genes, presence of which is difficult to assay. Thus, major differences may go undetected. Other types of errors may occur when species are classified solely on the basis of phenotype. For example, different enzymes (specified by different genes) may catalyze the same reaction. Also, even if a metabolic gene is functional, negative reactions can occur because of the inability of the substrate to enter the cell, because of a mutation in a regulatory gene, or by production of an inactive protein.
  • #6: Phylogenetic Approach The ideal means of identifying and classifying bacteria would be to compare each gene sequence in a given strain with the gene sequences for every known species. This cannot be done, but the total DNA of one organism can be compared with that of any other organism by a method called nucleic acid hybridization or DNA hybridization. This method can be used to measure the number of DNA sequences that any two organisms have in common and to estimate the percentage of divergence within DNA sequences that are related but not identical. DNA relatedness studies have been done for yeasts, viruses, bacteriophages, and many groups of bacteria. Five factors can be used to determine DNA relatedness: genome size, guanine-pluscytosine (G+C) content, DNA relatedness under conditions optimal for DNA reassociation, thermal stability of related DNA sequences, and DNA relatedness under conditions supraoptimal for DNA reassociation. Because it is not practical to conduct these genotypic or phylogenetic evaluations in clinical laboratories, the results of simpler tests usually must be correlated with known phylogenetic data. For example, yellow strains of Enterobacter cloacae were shown, by DNA relatedness, to form a separate species, Enterobacter sakazakii, but were not designated as such until results of practical tests were correlated with the DNA data to allow routine laboratories to identify the new species.
  • #11: DNA Relatedness under Conditions Optimal for DNA Reassociation DNA relatedness is determined by allowing single-stranded DNA from one strain to reassociate with single-stranded DNA from a second strain, to form a double-stranded DNA molecule (Figure 3-2). This is a specific, temperature-dependent reaction. The optimal temperature for DNA reassociation is 25 to 30°C below the temperature at which native double-stranded DNA denatures into single strands. Many studies indicate that a bacterial species is composed of strains that are 70 to 100 percent related. In contrast, relatedness between different species is 0 to about 65 percent. It is important to emphasize that the term "related" does not mean "identical" or "homologous." Similar but nonidentical nucleic acid sequences can reassociate. Thermal Stability of Related DNA Sequences Each 1 percent of unpaired nucleotide bases in a double-stranded DNA sequence causes a 1 percent decrease in the thermal stability of that DNA duplex. Therefore, a comparison between the thermal stability of a control double-stranded molecule (in which both strands of DNA are from the same organism) and that of a heteroduplex (DNA strands from two different organisms) allows assessment of divergence between related nucleotide sequences. DNA Relatedness under Supraoptimal Conditions for DNA Reassociation When the incubation temperature used for DNA reassociation is raised from 25-30° C below the denaturation temperature to only 10-15° C below the denaturation temperature, only very closely related (and therefore highly thermally stable) DNA sequences can reassociate. Strains from the same species are 60 percent or more related at these supraoptimal incubation temperatures. Defining Species on the Basis of DNA Relatedness Use of these five factors allows a species definition based on DNA. Thus, E coli can be defined as a series of strains with a G+C content of 49 to 52 moles percent, a genome molecular weight of 2.3 X 109 to 3.0 X 109, relatedness of 70 percent or more at an optimal reassociation temperature with 0 to 4 percent divergence in related sequences, and relatedness of 60 percent or more at a supraoptimal reassociation temperature. Experience with more than 300 species has produced an arbitrary phylogenetic definition of a species to which most taxonomists subscribe: "strains with approximately 70% or greater DNA-DNA relatedness and with 5° C or less divergence in related sequences." When these two criteria are met, genome size and G+C content are always similar, and relatedness is almost always 60 percent or more at supraoptimal incubation temperatures. The 70 percent species relatedness rule has been ignored occasionally when the existing nomenclature is deeply ingrained, as is that for E coli and the four Shigella species. Because these organisms are all 70 percent or more related, DNA studies indicate that they should be grouped into a single species, instead of the present five species in two genera. This change has not been made because of the presumed confusion that would result. DNA relatedness provides one species definition that can be applied equally to all organisms. Moreover, it cannot be affected by phenotypic variation, mutations, or the presence or absence of metabolic or other plasmids. It measures overall relatedness, and these factors affect only a very small percentage of the total DNA.
  • #14: Polyphasic Approach In practice, the approach to bacterial taxonomy should be polyphasic (Fig. 3-3). The first step is phenotypic grouping of strains by morphological, biochemical and any other characteristics of interest. The phenotypic groups are then tested for DNA relatedness to determine whether the observed phenotypic homogeneity (or heterogeneity) is reflected by phylogenetic homogeneity or heterogeneity. The third and most important step is reexamination of the biochemical characteristics of the DNA relatedness groups. This allows determination of the biochemical borders of each group and determination of reactions of diagnostic value for the group. For identification of a given organism, the importance of specific tests is weighted on the basis of correlation with DNA results. Occasionally, the reactions commonly used will not distinguish completely between two distinct DNA relatedness groups. In these cases, other biochemical tests of diagnostic value must be sought.
  • #18: Phenotypic Characteristics Useful in Classification and Identification Morphologic Characteristics Both wet-mounted and properly stained bacterial cell suspensions can yield a great deal of information. These simple tests can indicate the Gram reaction of the organism; whether it is acid-fast; its motility; the arrangement of its flagella; the presence of spores, capsules, and inclusion bodies; and, of course, its shape. This information often can allow identification of an organism to the genus level, or can minimize the possibility that it belongs to one or another group. Colony characteristics and pigmentation are also quite helpful. For example, colonies of several Porphyromonas species autofluoresce under long-wavelength ultraviolet light, and Proteus species swarm on appropriate media. Growth Characteristics A primary distinguishing characteristic is whether an organism grows aerobically, anaerobically, facultatively (i.e., in either the presence or absence of oxygen), or microaerobically (i.e., in the presence of a less than atmospheric partial pressure of oxygen). The proper atmospheric conditions are essential for isolating and identifying bacteria. Other important growth assessments include the incubation temperature, pH, nutrients required, and resistance to antibiotics. For example, one diarrheal disease agent, Campylobacter jejuni, grows well at 42° C in the presence of several antibiotics; another, Y enterocolitica, grows better than most other bacteria at 4° C. Legionella, Haemophilus, and some other pathogens require specific growth factors, whereas E coli and most other Enterobacteriaceae can grow on minimal media. Antigens and Phage Susceptibility Cell wall (O), flagellar (H), and capsular (K) antigens are used to aid in classifying certain organisms at the species level, to serotype strains of medically important species for epidemiologic purposes, or to identify serotypes of public health importance. Serotyping is also sometimes used to distinguish strains of exceptional virulence or public health importance, for example with V cholerae (O1 is the pandemic strain) and E coli (enterotoxigenic, enteroinvasive, enterohemorrhagic, and enteropathogenic serotypes). Phage typing (determining the susceptibility pattern of an isolate to a set of specific bacteriophages) has been used primarily as an aid in epidemiologic surveillance of diseases caused by Staphylococcus aureus, mycobacteria, P aeruginosa, V cholerae, and S typhi. Susceptibility to bacteriocins has also been used as an epidemiologic strain marker. In most cases recently, phage and bacteriocin typing have been supplanted by molecular methods. Biochemical Characteristics Most bacteria are identified and classified largely on the basis of their reactions in a series of biochemical tests. Some tests are used routinely for many groups of bacteria (oxidase, nitrate reduction, amino acid degrading enzymes, fermentation or utilization of carbohydrates); others are restricted to a single family, genus, or species (coagulase test for staphylococci, pyrrolidonyl arylamidase test for Gram-positive cocci). Both the number of tests needed and the actual tests used for identification vary from one group of organisms to another. Therefore, the lengths to which a laboratory should go in detecting and identifying organisms must be decided in each laboratory on the basis of its function, the type of population it serves, and its resources. Clinical laboratories today base the extent of their work on the clinical relevance of an isolate to the particular patient from which it originated, the public health significance of complete identification, and the overall cost-benefit analysis of their procedures. For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reference laboratory uses at least 46 tests to identify members of the Enterobacteriaceae, whereas most clinical laboratories, using commercial identification kits or simple rapid tests, identify isolates with far fewer criteria.
  • #21: Phage typing (determining the susceptibility pattern of an isolate to a set of specific bacteriophages) has been used primarily as an aid in epidemiologic surveillance of diseases caused by Staphylococcus aureus, mycobacteria, P aeruginosa, V cholerae, and S typhi. Susceptibility to bacteriocins has also been used as an epidemiologic strain marker. In most cases recently, phage and bacteriocin typing have been supplanted by molecular methods.
  • #23: For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reference laboratory uses at least 46 tests to identify members of the Enterobacteriaceae, whereas most clinical laboratories, using commercial identification kits or simple rapid tests, identify isolates with far fewer criteria.
  • #24: Classification Below and Above the Species Level Below the Species Level Particularly for epidemiological purposes, clinical microbiologists must distinguish strains with particular traits from other strains in the same species. For example, serotype O157:H7 E coli are identified in stool specimens because of their association with bloody diarrhea and subsequent hemolytic uremic syndrome. Below the species level, strains are designated as groups or types on the basis of common serologic or biochemical reactions, phage or bacteriocin sensitivity, pathogenicity, or other characteristics. Many of these characteristics are already used and accepted: serotype, phage type, colicin type, biotype, bioserotype (a group of strains from the same species with common biochemical and serologic characteristics that set them apart from other members of the species), and pathotype (e.g., toxigenic Clostridium difficile, invasive E coli, and toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae). Above the Species Level In addition to species and subspecies designations, clinical microbiologists must be familiar with genera and families. A genus is a group of related species, and a family is a group of related genera. An ideal genus would be composed of species with similar phenotypic and phylogenetic characteristics. Some phenotypically homogeneous genera approach this criterion (Citrobacter, Yersinia, and Serratia). More often, however, the phenotypic similarity is present, but the genetic relatedness is not. Bacillus, Clostridium, and Legionella are examples of accepted phenotypic genera in which genetic relatedness between species is not 50 to 65 percent, but 0 to 65 percent. When phenotypic and genetic similarity are not both present, phenotypic similarity generally should be given priority in establishing genera. Identification practices are simplified by having the most phenotypically similar species in the same genus. The primary consideration for a genus is that it contain biochemically similar species that are convenient or important to consider as a group separate from other groups of organisms. The sequencing of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, which have been highly conserved through evolution, allows phylogenetic comparisons to be made between species whose total DNAs are essentially unrelated. It also allows phylogenetic classification at the genus, family, and higher taxonomic levels. The rRNA sequence data are usually not used to designate genera or families unless supported by similarities in phenotypic tests.
  • #25: Designation of New Species and Nomenclatural Changes Species are named according to principles and rules of nomenclature set forth in the Bacteriological Code. Scientific names are taken from Latin or Greek. The correct name of a species or higher taxon is determined by three criteria: valid publication, legitimacy of the name with regard to the rules of nomenclature, and priority of publication (that is, it must be the first validly published name for the taxon). To be published validly, a new species proposal must contain the species name, a description of the species, and the designation of a type strain for the species, and the name must be published in the International Journal for Systematic Bacteriology (IJSB). Once proposed, a name does not go through a formal process to be accepted officially; in fact, the opposite is true a validly published name is assumed to be correct unless and until it is challenged officially. A challenge is initiated by publishing a request for an opinion (to the Judicial Commission of the International Association of Microbiological Societies) in the IJSB. Designation of New Species and Nomenclatural Changes Species are named according to principles and rules of nomenclature set forth in the Bacteriological Code. Scientific names are taken from Latin or Greek. The correct name of a species or higher taxon is determined by three criteria: valid publication, legitimacy of the name with regard to the rules of nomenclature, and priority of publication (that is, it must be the first validly published name for the taxon). To be published validly, a new species proposal must contain the species name, a description of the species, and the designation of a type strain for the species, and the name must be published in the International Journal for Systematic Bacteriology (IJSB). Once proposed, a name does not go through a formal process to be accepted officially; in fact, the opposite is truea validly published name is assumed to be correct unless and until it is challenged officially. A challenge is initiated by publishing a request for an opinion (to the Judicial Commission of the International Association of Microbiological Societies) in the IJSB. This occurs only in cases in which the validity of a name is questioned with respect to compliance with the rules of the Bacteriological Code. A question of classification that is based on scientific data (for example, whether a species, on the basis of its biochemical or genetic characteristics, or both, should be placed in a new genus or an existing genus) is not settled by the Judicial Commission, but by the preference and usage of the scientific community. This is why there are pairs of names such as Providencia rettgeri/Proteus rettgeri, Moraxella catarrhalis/Branhamella catarrhalis, and Legionella micdadei/Tatlockia micdadei. More than one name may thus exist for a single organism. This is not, however, restricted to bacterial nomenclature. Multiple names exist for many antibiotics and other drugs and enzymes. A number of genera have been divided into additional genera and species have been moved to new or existing genera, such as Arcobacter (new genus for former members of Campylobacter) and Burkholderia species (formerly species of Pseudomonas). Two former Campylobacter species (cinaedi and fennelliae) have been moved to the existing genus Helicobacter in another example. The best source of information for new species proposals and nomenclatural changes is the IJSB. In addition, the Journal of Clinical Microbiology often publishes descriptions of newly described microorganisms isolated from clinical sources. Information, including biochemical reactions and sources of isolation, about new organisms of clinical importance, disease outbreaks caused by newer species, and reviews of clinical significance of certain organisms may be found in the Annals of Internal Medicine, Journal of Infectious Diseases, Clinical Microbiology Reviews, and Clinical Infectious Diseases. The data provided in these publications supplement and update Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, the definitive taxonomic reference text.