chapter2-2-_to_be_sent.ppt................

2-1
Linear Programming:
Model Formulation and
Graphical Solution
Chapter 2
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

2-2
LP Model Formulation – Minimization (1 of 8)
Chemical Contribution
Brand
Nitrogen
(lb/bag)
Phosphate
(lb/bag)
Super-gro 2 4
Crop-quick 4 3
A farmer is preparing to plant a crop in the spring and needs to fertilize
a field. There are two brands of fertilizer to choose from, Super-gro
and Crop-quick. Each brand yields a specific amount of nitrogen
and phosphate per bag, as follows:
The farmer’s field requires at least 16 pounds of nitrogen and at least
24 pounds of phosphate. Super-gro costs $6 per bag, and Crop-
quick costs $3. The farmer wants to know how many bags of each
brand to purchase in order to minimize the total cost of fertilizing.

2-3
Figure 2.15 Fertilizing
farmer’s field

2-4
Decision Variables:
x1 = number of bags of Super-gro to purchase
x2 = number of bags of Crop-quick to purchase
The Objective Function:
Minimize Z = $6x1 + 3x2
Where: $6x1 = cost of bags of Super-Gro
$3x2 = cost of bags of Crop-Quick
Model Constraints:
2x1 + 4x2  16 lb (nitrogen constraint)
4x1 + 3x2  24 lb (phosphate constraint)
x1, x2  0 (non-negativity constraint)

2-5
Minimize Z = $6x1 + $3x2
subject to: 2x1 + 4x2  16
4x1 + 3x2  24
x1, x2  0
Figure 2.16 Graph of Both Model Constraints
Constraint Graph – Minimization (4 of 8)

2-6
Figure 2.17 Feasible Solution Area
Feasible Region– Minimization (5 of 8)
4x1 + 3x2  24
x1, x2  0

2-7
Figure 2.18 Optimum Solution Point
Optimal Solution Point – Minimization (6 of 8)
4x1 + 3x2  24
x1, x2  0

2-8
 A surplus variable is subtracted from a  constraint to
convert it to an equation (=).
 A surplus variable represents an excess above a
constraint requirement level.
 A surplus variable contributes nothing to the calculated
value of the objective function.
 Subtracting surplus variables in the farmer problem
constraints:
2x1 + 4x2 - s1 = 16 (nitrogen)
4x1 + 3x2 - s2 = 24 (phosphate)
Surplus Variables – Minimization (7 of 8)

2-9
Figure 2.19 Graph of Fertilizer Example
Graphical Solutions – Minimization (8 of 8)
Minimize Z = $6x1 + $3x2 + 0s1 + 0s2
subject to: 2x1 + 4x2 – s1 = 16
4x1 + 3x2 – s2 = 24
x1, x2, s1, s2  0

2-10
For some linear programming models, the general rules
do not apply.
 Special types of problems include those with:
 Multiple optimal solutions
 Infeasible solutions
 Unbounded solutions
Irregular Types of Linear Programming Problems

2-11
Figure 2.20 Example with Multiple Optimal Solutions
Multiple Optimal Solutions Beaver Creek Pottery
Maximize Z=$40x1 + 30x2
subject to: 1x1 + 2x2  40
4x2 + 3x2  120
x1, x2  0
Where:
x1 = number of bowls
x2 = number of mugs

2-12
Figure 2.20 Example with Multiple Optimal Solutions
Multiple Optimal Solutions Beaver Creek Pottery
The objective function is
parallel to a constraint line.
Maximize Z=$40x1 + 30x2
4x2 + 3x2  120
x1, x2  0
Where:
x1 = number of bowls
x2 = number of mugs

2-13
An Infeasible Problem
Figure 2.21 Graph of an Infeasible Problem
Maximize Z = 5x1 + 3x2
x1  4
x2  6
x1, x2  0

2-14
An Infeasible Problem
Figure 2.21 Graph of an Infeasible Problem
Every possible solution
violates at least one constraint:
x1  4
x2  6
x1, x2  0

2-15
An Unbounded Problem
Figure 2.22 Graph of an Unbounded Problem
subject to: x1  4
x2  2
x1, x2  0

2-16
An Unbounded Problem
Figure 2.22 Graph of an Unbounded Problem
Value of the objective
function increases indefinitely:
subject to: x1  4
x2  2
x1, x2  0

2-17
Characteristics of Linear Programming Problems
 A decision amongst alternative courses of action is required.
 The decision is represented in the model by decision variables.
 The problem encompasses a goal, expressed as an objective
function, that the decision maker wants to achieve.
 Restrictions (represented by constraints) exist that limit the
extent of achievement of the objective.
 The objective and constraints must be definable by linear
mathematical functional relationships.

2-18
 Proportionality - The rate of change (slope) of the objective
function and constraint equations is constant.
 Additivity - Terms in the objective function and constraint
equations must be additive.
 Divisibility -Decision variables can take on any fractional value
and are therefore continuous as opposed to integer in nature.
 Certainty - Values of all the model parameters are assumed to
be known with certainty (non-probabilistic).
Properties of Linear Programming Models

2-19
Problem Statement
Example Problem No. 1 (1 of 4)
Moore’s Meat Company produces a hot dog mixture in 1,000-pound
batches, The mixture contains two ingredients chicken and beef. The cost
per pound of each of these ingredients is as follow:
Ingredient Cost/lb.
Chicken $3
Beef $5
Each batch has the following recipe requirements:
a. At least 500 pounds of chicken.
b. At least 200 pounds of beef.
The ratio of chicken to beef must be at least 2 to 1. The company wants
to know the optimal mixture of ingredients that will minimize cost.
Formulate a linear programming model for this problem.

2-20
Problem Statement
■ Hot dog mixture in 1000-pound batches.
■ Two ingredients, chicken ($3/lb) and beef ($5/lb).
■ Recipe requirements:
at least 500 pounds of “chicken”
at least 200 pounds of “beef”
■ Ratio of chicken to beef must be at least 2 to 1.
■ Determine optimal mixture of ingredients that will
minimize costs.

2-21
Solution

2-22
Solution

2-23
Solve the following model graphically:
subject to: x1 + 2x2  10
6x1 + 6x2  36
x1  4
x1, x2  0

2-24

2-25

2-26

chapter2-2-_to_be_sent.ppt................

More Related Content

Similar to chapter2-2-_to_be_sent.ppt................ (20)

More from ssuser486a8b (13)

Recently uploaded (20)

chapter2-2-_to_be_sent.ppt................