SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Choice Lab
Presentation
BY: THOMAS CORNETTE & SCARLETT HARRIS
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Choice Lab Presentation (final)
Muscular Strength:
 The maximum amount of force that is produce by
a muscle or muscle group at a specific attachment
site on the skeleton.
 Examples of assessment methods:
1. 1-RM test (ex: bench press, squat, power clean)
2. Isokinetic strength test (ex: Biodex)
3. Grip strength (ex: dynamometer)
(
(Hamill & Knutzen, 2009)
Grip Strength:
 The force applied by the hand during
concentric contraction.
 Grip strength is often used to get a general
indication of muscular strength and it is also a
good indicator of upper limb strength.
 It is measured in either pounds or kilograms
(Heyward & Gibson, 1998)
(Narazaki, Matsuo, Honda, Nofuji, Yonemeto, & Kumagai, 2014)
Hand Grip Dynamometer:
 This is the chosen assessment for
hand grip strength for this lab
 https://www.youtube.com/watc
h?v=frcNPiLnWRo
(Muscular strength, 2014)
Power:
 Power is defined as the product of force and velocity
 Power is the distinguisher between mediocre and elite
athletes
 All energy systems are used but the primary ones are:
1. Phosphocreatine
2. ATP storage
(Heyward & Gibson, 1998)
(Hamill & Knutzen, 2009)
Power Assessment Methods:
 Standing long (broad) jump
 Vertical jump test
 Just jump mats
 Shock put back throw
 Punch power
 Overhead medicine ball throw (forwards)
(Speed & Power fitness tests, 2014)
Vertical Jump Test:
 The vertical jump shows the power someone has as they jump
from a stand still position as high as they can.
 Dominantly focuses on the power of the legs
 The equipment used for this lab was the Vertec
 Jump testing choice of many college and professional teams
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85EtdsmFCoY
(McArdle, Katch & Katch, 2010)
Girth:
 The measurement around the middle of
something also known as circumference or
perimeter.
 Measured in inches or centimeters
 Gulick tape is used to measure girth
 Examples of girth measurements:
1. Waist
2. Hip
3. Forearm
4. Thigh
5. Calf
6. Neck
(How FIT are you?…test yourself!, 2012)
(Heyward & Gibson, 1998)
Muscle: How It Works
(McArdle, Katch & Katch, 2010)
1.Nerve Action
Potential.
2. Acetylcholine
3. Calcium
4. Troponin
5. Tropomyosin
6. Myosin
Head/Actin Binding
Site
Applications:
Grip Strength:
 Good measure for total upper body strength
 Used in rehabilitation
 Athletes gauge of progress
Vertical Jump:
 Measure of lower body power
 Athletes gauge of progress
 Possible use in rehabilitation
(McArdle, Katch & Katch, 2010)
(Heyward & Gibson, 1998)
Purpose:
 The purpose of this lab was to determine
if larger forearm girth results in higher grip
strength and if larger thigh girth results in a
higher vertical jump.
Hypothesis:
 The hypothesis is that the larger the
forearm girth, the higher the grip strength
will be and that the larger the thigh girth,
the higher the vertical jump will be.
Choice Lab Presentation (final)
Subjects:
 6 subjects
 3 males & 3 females
 All healthy young adults (ages between 20-21)
Hand Grip Strength:
 Height & Weight was conducted first (inches and kilograms)
 Each subject had his or her right and left forearm girth measured with gulick tape at the
point of highest circumference.
 The subject was asked to straighten their arm out with their palms facing upward.
 Circumference of the forearm was measured in centimeters.
 Clinical Health Services hand grip dynamometer was used to assess grip strength.
 The subjects were then given a handgrip dynamometer (adjusted to their grip preference)
 When instructed, the subject squeezed the dynamometer as hard as possible until no
increases in strength was observed.
 Each subject performed the test two times on both hands and the highest number for
each one was recorded.
 The same manufacturer for the hand grip dynamometer was used to eliminate data
errors.
Vertical Jump Test:
 Height & Weight was conducted first (inches and kilograms)
 Each subject had his or her right, and left thigh measured using gulick tape at the
point of highest circumference.
 The subject was asked to place their foot on a chair
 Thigh circumference was measured in centimeters
 The Vertec vertical jump tool was used to assess vertical jump max.
 The Vertec was adjusted 12 inches above finger tip reach of the subject.
 When instructed, the subjects were told to jump and touch the highest marker
possible.
 Upon two unsuccessful jumps, the inches were added up to max vertical jump
height.
 The same procedure was used for each subject.
Variables:
 Independent: Girth measurements of the
forearm and thigh.
 Dependent: Grip strength and vertical
jump height.
Choice Lab Presentation (final)
Mean SD Range
Height 174.42 5 I67.64-182.88
Weight 78.47 16.47 70.91-104.55
D FA Girth 27.42 2.20 25-31
ND FA Girth 26.83 1.83 25-30
D Grip 48.17 10.17 40-66
ND Grip 45.67 11.06 36-66
D Thigh Girth 57.5 6.13 51.5-66
ND Thigh Girth 57.58 6.97 51.5-66
Vertical 21.42 4.73 17-28.5
Table 1. Mean, SD, and Range of results
Height is measured in cm. Weight is measured in kg. FA= Forearm which is measured in girth. D=dominant, ND= non dominant. Grip is
measured in kg. Girth is measured in cm. Vertical measured in inches.
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
55.00
60.00
65.00
70.00
23.00 24.00 25.00 26.00 27.00 28.00 29.00 30.00 31.00 32.00
GripStength(kg)
Forearm Girth (cm)
Forearm Girth in Relation to Grip Strength
Figure 1. Forearm Girth In Relation to Grip Atrength
r=.93 (dominant hand), r=.94 (non-dominant hand)
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
50.00 52.00 54.00 56.00 58.00 60.00 62.00 64.00 66.00 68.00
JumpHeight(Inches)
Thigh Girth (cm)
Thigh Girth in Relation to Vertical Jump
Figure 2. Thigh Girth in Relation to Vertical Jump Height
r= -.63
Choice Lab Presentation (final)
Normative Data Comparison:
 For men aged 20-29 normal grip strength for the right hand is 47(9.5)
kg, for the left hand it is 45(8.8) kg. 1/3 of the males fell into well
above average category, and 2/3 fell into the average category.
 For females, ages 20-29, the normal grip strength for the right hand is
30(7) kg, and for the left hand 28(6.1) kg. All of the females fell into
the above average category.
 The average vertical jump for males aged 21-30 is 22.1(3.4) inches.
1/3 of males in this study fell below average, and 2/3 fell above
average.
 The average vertical jump for females ages 21-30 is 14.1(2.5) inches.
All females in this study fell above average.
(Massey-Westropp, Gill, Taylor, Bohannon, & Hill, 2011)
(Patterson & Peterson, 2004)
Correlations:
Grip Strength (kilograms) & Forearm Girth (centimeters):
 The strong positive correlation between grip strength and forearm girth
somewhat agrees with the literate found. The literature shows that there
is a positive correlation between fore arm girth and grip strength, but
mostly in males. One study shows weak negative correlation for
females and another shows a weak positive correlation.
 The differences in the present study could stem from the fact that the
females in the present study are all athletes.
Vertical Jump Height (inches) & Thigh Girth (centimeters):
 The negative correlation between thigh girth and vertical jump height is
consistent with the literature.
(Anakwe, Huntly, & Mceachan, 2006)
(Davis, Briscoe, Markowski, Saville, & Taylor, 2003)
Applications:
 Grip Strength and Forearm
 Athletes can do forearm exercise to increase grip strength for sport
related activities and use forearm girth as a gauge to whether or
not their current program is working for them in this area.
 Clinicians can use forearm exercises to increase hand strength after
surgery or injury to the wrist, hand , or arm. Forearm girth can be
used as a measure to determine if the current rehabilitation
program is working or not.
 Thigh Girth and Vertical Jump
 Thigh girth does not correspond to vertical jump. Athletes can use
this information to understand that thigh girth does not mean a
higher jump.
Conclusion:
 The original hypothesis stated that larger forearm
girth would result in a higher grip strength and
that a larger thigh girth would result in a higher
vertical jump.
 Forearm girth and grip strength was confirmed
 Thigh girth and vertical jump was refuted
References:
 Anakwe, R. E., Huntly, J. S., & Mceachan, J. E. (2006). Grip Strength and Forearm Circumference in
a Healthy Population. Journal Of Hand Surgery (European Volume) , 203-209.
 Davis, S. D., Briscoe, D. A., Markowski, C. T., Saville, S. E., & Taylor, C. J. (2003). Physical
Characteristics That Predict Vertical Jump Performance In Recreational Male Athletes . Physical
Therapy In Sport , 167-174.
 Heyward, V., & Gibson, A. (1998). Advanced fitness assessment & exercise prescription (3rd ed.).
Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
 Massey-Westropp, N. M., Gill, T. K., Taylor, A. W., Bohannon, R. W., & Hill, C. L. (2011). Hand Grip
Strength: Age and Gender Stratified Normative Data in a Population-Based Study . BMC research
Notes , 1-5.
 McArdle, W. D., Katch, F. I., & Katch, V. L. (2010). Exercise Physiology (Seventh ed.). Baltimore, MD.
 Patterson, D. D., & Peterson, F. D. (2004). Vertical jump and Leg Power Norms For Young
Adults. Measurement In Physical Education and Exercise Science , 33-41.
 Speed & Power Fitness Tests. (2014, December 3). Retrieved December 3, 2014, from
http://www.topendsports.com/testing/anaerob.htm

Picture References:
 How FIT are you?…test yourself! (2012, February 9). Retrieved
December 1, 2014.
 Muscle Strength. (2014, February 2). Retrieved November 26, 2014.
 Padilla, E. (2014, March 28). The Strength of Green. Retrieved
November 25, 2014.

More Related Content

PPTX
Cga ifa 2015 7 why we walk the way we do
PDF
Hamstring Strains Project- FINAL!
PPTX
Pulling Exercises: Analyzing the Deadlift
PPTX
NSCA National Conference (2013) Podium Presentation
PDF
Correlation between conventional clinical tests and a new movement assessment...
PPTX
Cga ifa 2015 10 impairment focussed interpretation
PPTX
Case study: Revision ACLR rehab complicated by PFPS
PPTX
Presentazione villa stuart
Cga ifa 2015 7 why we walk the way we do
Hamstring Strains Project- FINAL!
Pulling Exercises: Analyzing the Deadlift
NSCA National Conference (2013) Podium Presentation
Correlation between conventional clinical tests and a new movement assessment...
Cga ifa 2015 10 impairment focussed interpretation
Case study: Revision ACLR rehab complicated by PFPS
Presentazione villa stuart

What's hot (20)

PDF
Dissertation Completed
PPTX
Fitness tools and trends
PPTX
Lower Extremity Stiffness Lecture
PPTX
KC MV poster_Stegall Lab
PPT
Application of Biomechanical Analysis to Performance Testing & Program Design
PDF
John Orchard - hamstrings injuries
PPTX
Research Proposal
PDF
Changes in Body Position during a 2-Minute Push-Up Test: Crimson Publishers
PDF
Mi gliaccio et al. 2018 leg press vs. smith
PDF
Tania Pizzari - Risk factors for hamstring strain
DOCX
Final Project Template - FINAL EDIT
PDF
Effect of sand training on jumping abilities of junior volleyball players
PPT
PHYSIOLOGY Chap6
PPTX
Basics of biomechanics
PPTX
Veterans Affairs Student Inservice
PPTX
Why we walk the way we do (ug)
PPTX
The needs analysis
PDF
Poster SIF morra_LP
PDF
Quadriceps Muscle Injuries: James Moore
PPTX
Principles and practices of agility training
Dissertation Completed
Fitness tools and trends
Lower Extremity Stiffness Lecture
KC MV poster_Stegall Lab
Application of Biomechanical Analysis to Performance Testing & Program Design
John Orchard - hamstrings injuries
Research Proposal
Changes in Body Position during a 2-Minute Push-Up Test: Crimson Publishers
Mi gliaccio et al. 2018 leg press vs. smith
Tania Pizzari - Risk factors for hamstring strain
Final Project Template - FINAL EDIT
Effect of sand training on jumping abilities of junior volleyball players
PHYSIOLOGY Chap6
Basics of biomechanics
Veterans Affairs Student Inservice
Why we walk the way we do (ug)
The needs analysis
Poster SIF morra_LP
Quadriceps Muscle Injuries: James Moore
Principles and practices of agility training
Ad

Similar to Choice Lab Presentation (final) (20)

PPT
Power measurement
PPTX
Athletic Testing
PDF
IBDP CAS Fitness Handbook
PDF
J Str Cond Res-2001-Coppack
PPTX
CHAPTER-3-PE Self-Testing-Activities.pptx
PPTX
PPTX
mapeh 8 (lesson 1).pptx
PPTX
PE 01
PDF
Physical fitness assessment
PPT
Strength Assessment
DOCX
Senior Thesis (Casey Robbins)
PPTX
PE 7 | Lesson 2: PHYSICAL FITNESS TEST AND ASSESSMENT
PDF
grade7lesson2-200612095835.pdf
PPTX
PPTX
Physical fitness test2
PPTX
Physical Fitness Assessment
PPTX
The relationship between different types of strength and flexibility on verti...
PDF
Hand Grip Strength Norms
PDF
Correlation_between_Sargent_jump (2)
PDF
physicalfitnesstestlecture-141117053550-conversion-gate01.pdf
Power measurement
Athletic Testing
IBDP CAS Fitness Handbook
J Str Cond Res-2001-Coppack
CHAPTER-3-PE Self-Testing-Activities.pptx
mapeh 8 (lesson 1).pptx
PE 01
Physical fitness assessment
Strength Assessment
Senior Thesis (Casey Robbins)
PE 7 | Lesson 2: PHYSICAL FITNESS TEST AND ASSESSMENT
grade7lesson2-200612095835.pdf
Physical fitness test2
Physical Fitness Assessment
The relationship between different types of strength and flexibility on verti...
Hand Grip Strength Norms
Correlation_between_Sargent_jump (2)
physicalfitnesstestlecture-141117053550-conversion-gate01.pdf
Ad

Choice Lab Presentation (final)

  • 1. Choice Lab Presentation BY: THOMAS CORNETTE & SCARLETT HARRIS
  • 4. Muscular Strength:  The maximum amount of force that is produce by a muscle or muscle group at a specific attachment site on the skeleton.  Examples of assessment methods: 1. 1-RM test (ex: bench press, squat, power clean) 2. Isokinetic strength test (ex: Biodex) 3. Grip strength (ex: dynamometer) ( (Hamill & Knutzen, 2009)
  • 5. Grip Strength:  The force applied by the hand during concentric contraction.  Grip strength is often used to get a general indication of muscular strength and it is also a good indicator of upper limb strength.  It is measured in either pounds or kilograms (Heyward & Gibson, 1998) (Narazaki, Matsuo, Honda, Nofuji, Yonemeto, & Kumagai, 2014)
  • 6. Hand Grip Dynamometer:  This is the chosen assessment for hand grip strength for this lab  https://www.youtube.com/watc h?v=frcNPiLnWRo (Muscular strength, 2014)
  • 7. Power:  Power is defined as the product of force and velocity  Power is the distinguisher between mediocre and elite athletes  All energy systems are used but the primary ones are: 1. Phosphocreatine 2. ATP storage (Heyward & Gibson, 1998) (Hamill & Knutzen, 2009)
  • 8. Power Assessment Methods:  Standing long (broad) jump  Vertical jump test  Just jump mats  Shock put back throw  Punch power  Overhead medicine ball throw (forwards) (Speed & Power fitness tests, 2014)
  • 9. Vertical Jump Test:  The vertical jump shows the power someone has as they jump from a stand still position as high as they can.  Dominantly focuses on the power of the legs  The equipment used for this lab was the Vertec  Jump testing choice of many college and professional teams  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85EtdsmFCoY (McArdle, Katch & Katch, 2010)
  • 10. Girth:  The measurement around the middle of something also known as circumference or perimeter.  Measured in inches or centimeters  Gulick tape is used to measure girth  Examples of girth measurements: 1. Waist 2. Hip 3. Forearm 4. Thigh 5. Calf 6. Neck (How FIT are you?…test yourself!, 2012) (Heyward & Gibson, 1998)
  • 11. Muscle: How It Works (McArdle, Katch & Katch, 2010) 1.Nerve Action Potential. 2. Acetylcholine 3. Calcium 4. Troponin 5. Tropomyosin 6. Myosin Head/Actin Binding Site
  • 12. Applications: Grip Strength:  Good measure for total upper body strength  Used in rehabilitation  Athletes gauge of progress Vertical Jump:  Measure of lower body power  Athletes gauge of progress  Possible use in rehabilitation (McArdle, Katch & Katch, 2010) (Heyward & Gibson, 1998)
  • 13. Purpose:  The purpose of this lab was to determine if larger forearm girth results in higher grip strength and if larger thigh girth results in a higher vertical jump.
  • 14. Hypothesis:  The hypothesis is that the larger the forearm girth, the higher the grip strength will be and that the larger the thigh girth, the higher the vertical jump will be.
  • 16. Subjects:  6 subjects  3 males & 3 females  All healthy young adults (ages between 20-21)
  • 17. Hand Grip Strength:  Height & Weight was conducted first (inches and kilograms)  Each subject had his or her right and left forearm girth measured with gulick tape at the point of highest circumference.  The subject was asked to straighten their arm out with their palms facing upward.  Circumference of the forearm was measured in centimeters.  Clinical Health Services hand grip dynamometer was used to assess grip strength.  The subjects were then given a handgrip dynamometer (adjusted to their grip preference)  When instructed, the subject squeezed the dynamometer as hard as possible until no increases in strength was observed.  Each subject performed the test two times on both hands and the highest number for each one was recorded.  The same manufacturer for the hand grip dynamometer was used to eliminate data errors.
  • 18. Vertical Jump Test:  Height & Weight was conducted first (inches and kilograms)  Each subject had his or her right, and left thigh measured using gulick tape at the point of highest circumference.  The subject was asked to place their foot on a chair  Thigh circumference was measured in centimeters  The Vertec vertical jump tool was used to assess vertical jump max.  The Vertec was adjusted 12 inches above finger tip reach of the subject.  When instructed, the subjects were told to jump and touch the highest marker possible.  Upon two unsuccessful jumps, the inches were added up to max vertical jump height.  The same procedure was used for each subject.
  • 19. Variables:  Independent: Girth measurements of the forearm and thigh.  Dependent: Grip strength and vertical jump height.
  • 21. Mean SD Range Height 174.42 5 I67.64-182.88 Weight 78.47 16.47 70.91-104.55 D FA Girth 27.42 2.20 25-31 ND FA Girth 26.83 1.83 25-30 D Grip 48.17 10.17 40-66 ND Grip 45.67 11.06 36-66 D Thigh Girth 57.5 6.13 51.5-66 ND Thigh Girth 57.58 6.97 51.5-66 Vertical 21.42 4.73 17-28.5 Table 1. Mean, SD, and Range of results Height is measured in cm. Weight is measured in kg. FA= Forearm which is measured in girth. D=dominant, ND= non dominant. Grip is measured in kg. Girth is measured in cm. Vertical measured in inches.
  • 22. 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 23.00 24.00 25.00 26.00 27.00 28.00 29.00 30.00 31.00 32.00 GripStength(kg) Forearm Girth (cm) Forearm Girth in Relation to Grip Strength Figure 1. Forearm Girth In Relation to Grip Atrength r=.93 (dominant hand), r=.94 (non-dominant hand)
  • 23. 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 50.00 52.00 54.00 56.00 58.00 60.00 62.00 64.00 66.00 68.00 JumpHeight(Inches) Thigh Girth (cm) Thigh Girth in Relation to Vertical Jump Figure 2. Thigh Girth in Relation to Vertical Jump Height r= -.63
  • 25. Normative Data Comparison:  For men aged 20-29 normal grip strength for the right hand is 47(9.5) kg, for the left hand it is 45(8.8) kg. 1/3 of the males fell into well above average category, and 2/3 fell into the average category.  For females, ages 20-29, the normal grip strength for the right hand is 30(7) kg, and for the left hand 28(6.1) kg. All of the females fell into the above average category.  The average vertical jump for males aged 21-30 is 22.1(3.4) inches. 1/3 of males in this study fell below average, and 2/3 fell above average.  The average vertical jump for females ages 21-30 is 14.1(2.5) inches. All females in this study fell above average. (Massey-Westropp, Gill, Taylor, Bohannon, & Hill, 2011) (Patterson & Peterson, 2004)
  • 26. Correlations: Grip Strength (kilograms) & Forearm Girth (centimeters):  The strong positive correlation between grip strength and forearm girth somewhat agrees with the literate found. The literature shows that there is a positive correlation between fore arm girth and grip strength, but mostly in males. One study shows weak negative correlation for females and another shows a weak positive correlation.  The differences in the present study could stem from the fact that the females in the present study are all athletes. Vertical Jump Height (inches) & Thigh Girth (centimeters):  The negative correlation between thigh girth and vertical jump height is consistent with the literature. (Anakwe, Huntly, & Mceachan, 2006) (Davis, Briscoe, Markowski, Saville, & Taylor, 2003)
  • 27. Applications:  Grip Strength and Forearm  Athletes can do forearm exercise to increase grip strength for sport related activities and use forearm girth as a gauge to whether or not their current program is working for them in this area.  Clinicians can use forearm exercises to increase hand strength after surgery or injury to the wrist, hand , or arm. Forearm girth can be used as a measure to determine if the current rehabilitation program is working or not.  Thigh Girth and Vertical Jump  Thigh girth does not correspond to vertical jump. Athletes can use this information to understand that thigh girth does not mean a higher jump.
  • 28. Conclusion:  The original hypothesis stated that larger forearm girth would result in a higher grip strength and that a larger thigh girth would result in a higher vertical jump.  Forearm girth and grip strength was confirmed  Thigh girth and vertical jump was refuted
  • 29. References:  Anakwe, R. E., Huntly, J. S., & Mceachan, J. E. (2006). Grip Strength and Forearm Circumference in a Healthy Population. Journal Of Hand Surgery (European Volume) , 203-209.  Davis, S. D., Briscoe, D. A., Markowski, C. T., Saville, S. E., & Taylor, C. J. (2003). Physical Characteristics That Predict Vertical Jump Performance In Recreational Male Athletes . Physical Therapy In Sport , 167-174.  Heyward, V., & Gibson, A. (1998). Advanced fitness assessment & exercise prescription (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.  Massey-Westropp, N. M., Gill, T. K., Taylor, A. W., Bohannon, R. W., & Hill, C. L. (2011). Hand Grip Strength: Age and Gender Stratified Normative Data in a Population-Based Study . BMC research Notes , 1-5.  McArdle, W. D., Katch, F. I., & Katch, V. L. (2010). Exercise Physiology (Seventh ed.). Baltimore, MD.  Patterson, D. D., & Peterson, F. D. (2004). Vertical jump and Leg Power Norms For Young Adults. Measurement In Physical Education and Exercise Science , 33-41.  Speed & Power Fitness Tests. (2014, December 3). Retrieved December 3, 2014, from http://www.topendsports.com/testing/anaerob.htm 
  • 30. Picture References:  How FIT are you?…test yourself! (2012, February 9). Retrieved December 1, 2014.  Muscle Strength. (2014, February 2). Retrieved November 26, 2014.  Padilla, E. (2014, March 28). The Strength of Green. Retrieved November 25, 2014.