SlideShare a Scribd company logo
CIVE 702
MIDTERM
WINTER 2015
Cyle Teal
CIVE 702
February 12, 2015
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1
FLEXIBILITY MATRIX COMPUTATION ....................................................................2
Beam length ...............................................................................................................2
Geometric centroid....................................................................................................2
Principal Second Moments of Area...........................................................................2
Polar Second Moment of Area ..................................................................................2
Shear Center...............................................................................................................3
Material Properties ....................................................................................................3
Flexibility Matrix........................................................................................................3
SECTION PROPERTY COMPARISON.........................................................................3
Discussion ..................................................................................................................4
STRESS COMPUTATION.............................................................................................4
Bending.......................................................................................................................4
Shear Stress ................................................................................................................5
Shear Area ..................................................................................................................6
Torsion........................................................................................................................7
DISPLACEMENT COMPUTATION .............................................................................7
Comparison .............................................................................................................. 10
CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................ 10
INTRODUCTION
The cantilevered beam shown in Figure 1, an L4x4 angle with length of 84 inches,
was analyzed in the following steps:
1. Section properties, specifically, principal second moments of area,
geometric centroid and shear center, were computed by hand. Hand results
were compared with results obtained from SolidWorks.
2. Stress distributions due to shear, bending and torsion were computed by
hand. Also, the principle of virtual forces was leveraged to compute the
shear areas of the cross section, and this result was compared with values
published for this cross section1.
3. The three displacements (𝑈𝑈1, 𝑈𝑈2, 𝑈𝑈3) and three rotations (𝑈𝑈4, 𝑈𝑈5, 𝑈𝑈6) of the
cantilever tip, induced by a vertical force applied to the free end of the
beam and through the shear center, were computed using the generalized
beam element formulation. MATLAB was used for matrix computation and
results were compared to those obtained from a 3-D beam element model
in Abaqus.
In all steps, percentage errors were computed from the comparison and values
were reported in table format.
Figure 1. L4x4x1/4 Aluminum Alloy, Grade 6061-76, cantilevered beam
1
Zureick, A., Emkin, L., Gwangseok, N., Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Materials Research
Report No. 07-1, February 2007
PAGE 1
Figure 2. L4x4 Cross Section Dimensions
FLEXIBILITY MATRIX COMPUTATION
All computations for the property values presented hereafter can be found in
Appendix A.
BEAM LENGTH
Beam length, 𝐿𝐿, was given in the problem statement as 84 inches.
GEOMETRIC CENTROID
Geometric centroid was computed to be 𝑦𝑦� = 𝑧𝑧̅ = 1.093 in., relative to bottom left
corner of section.
PRINCIPAL SECOND MOMENTS OF AREA
The angle of rotation that relates the coordinate system shown in Figure 1 to the
principal coordinate system was computed to be 𝜗𝜗 = 45°. Using this value,
principal second area moments for the y’ and z’ axis were computed to be 𝐼𝐼𝑦𝑦′ =
4.855 in4
and 𝐼𝐼𝑦𝑦′ = 1.225 in4
.
POLAR SECOND MOMENT OF AREA
𝐽𝐽 = .0403 in4
Y
Z
PAGE 2
SHEAR CENTER
The following values for location of the shear center are given in the principal
coordinate system with origin located at geometric centroid
𝑦𝑦𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 = −1.369 in
𝑧𝑧𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 = 0 in
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Modulus of Elasticity, Shear Modulus, and Poisson’s ratio for Grade 6061-T6
aluminum obtained from asm.matweb.com
𝐸𝐸 = 10E + 07 psi
𝐺𝐺 = 3.77E + 06 psi
𝜈𝜈 = 0.33
FLEXIBILITY MATRIX
A MATLAB script was used, see Appendix B, to generate the following flexibility
matrix for a general beam element with the properties presented above
4.34E-06 0 0 0 0 0
0 0.016155 0 0 0 0.000288
[𝐹𝐹] = 0 0 0.004096 0 -7.3E-05 0
0 0 0 0.000553 0 0
0 0 -7.3E-05 0 1.73E-06 0
0 0.000288 0 0 0 6.86E-06
SECTION PROPERTY COMPARISON
As stated in the introduction, the section property values for L4x4 angle were
obtained by hand and compared to those obtained from modeling the section in
SolidWorks and online sources. The comparison, including percentage errors, is
presented in Table 1.
PAGE 3
Table 1. Section Property Value Comparison
Property Hand SolidWorks Percentage Error
(%)
𝑦𝑦� 1.093 in 1.0723 in 1.93
𝑧𝑧̅ 1.093 in 1.0723 in 1.93
𝐼𝐼𝑦𝑦′ 4.855 in4 4.7333 in4 2.57
𝐼𝐼𝑧𝑧′ 1.225 in4 1.2245 in4 4.08E-02
𝐽𝐽 .0403 in4 .0404 in4 (1) 0.25
1. SolidWorks’ value differed greatly, so obtained value of 0.0404 from Zureick et al., 2007
DISCUSSION
The percentage errors for all section properties were acceptable. The main reason
for the observed differences is the cross section was modeled in SolidWorks with
fillets of 𝑅𝑅 = 0.375 in at the edge formed by the joining of the two legs and 𝑅𝑅 =
0.25 in at the end of the legs. The addition of material in the region were the edges
meet and the subtraction of material at the end of the legs causes a change in
section properties.
STRESS COMPUTATION
Derivation of the equations presented in this section can be found in Appendix A
BENDING
Axial stress due to bending in the principle coordinate system is given by
𝜎𝜎𝑥𝑥 = 688.78𝑧𝑧′
+ 2511.8𝑦𝑦′
psi
Table 2 presents values for axial stress at the locations shown in Figure 3.
Table 2. Axial Stress at Select Locations
Point 𝒚𝒚 𝒛𝒛 𝒚𝒚′ 𝒛𝒛′ 𝝈𝝈𝒙𝒙 (psi)
A -0.968 2.907 1.37108 2.740039 5180.461
B -0.968 0.907 -0.04313 1.325825 731.9387
C -0.968 -0.968 -1.36896 0 -3438.55
D 0.907 -0.968 -0.04313 -1.32583 -948.624
E 2.907 -0.968 1.37108 -2.74004 1707.297
PAGE 4
Figure 3. Locations for Stress Computation
SHEAR STRESS
For a principal coordinate system, shear flow is given by
𝜏𝜏𝜏𝜏 =
𝑉𝑉𝑦𝑦′ 𝑄𝑄𝑧𝑧′
𝐼𝐼𝑧𝑧′
+
𝑉𝑉𝑧𝑧′ 𝑄𝑄𝑦𝑦′
𝐼𝐼𝑦𝑦′
The equations for 𝑄𝑄𝑦𝑦′ and 𝑄𝑄𝑧𝑧′ were computed for each rectangle of the cross
section in MATLAB, see Appendix C.
Vertical leg
𝑄𝑄𝑦𝑦′ = �
𝑧𝑧̅
4
−
2907
4000
� �
121√2
250
−
√2�𝑧𝑧̿ + 2907
1000� �
4
� , −.843 ≤ 𝑧𝑧̅ ≤ 2.907
𝑄𝑄𝑧𝑧′ = − �
𝑧𝑧̅
4
−
2907
4000
� �
121√2
250
+
√2�𝑧𝑧̿ + 2907
1000� �
4
� , −.843 ≤ 𝑧𝑧̅ ≤ 2.907
Horizontal leg
𝑄𝑄𝑦𝑦′ = �
𝑦𝑦�
4
−
2907
4000
� �
121√2
250
−
√2�𝑦𝑦� + 2907
1000� �
4
� , −1.093 ≤ 𝑦𝑦� ≤ 2.907
A
C
B
D
E
𝒛𝒛
𝒚𝒚
PAGE 5
𝑄𝑄𝑧𝑧′ = �
𝑦𝑦�
4
−
2907
4000
� �
121√2
250
+
√2�𝑦𝑦� + 2907
1000� �
4
� , −1.093 ≤ 𝑦𝑦� ≤ 2.907
Shear stress was computed for eight locations in the cross section and is presented
in the following table.
Table 3. Shear Stress at Select Locations
Point 𝒚𝒚�
(in)
𝒛𝒛�
(in)
𝒍𝒍
(in)
𝑨𝑨
(in2)
𝒚𝒚′
(in)
𝒛𝒛′
(in)
𝑸𝑸𝒚𝒚′
(in3)
𝑸𝑸𝒛𝒛′
(in3)
𝝉𝝉
(psi)
A -0.968 2.907 0.000 0.000 1.371 2.740 0.000 0.000 0.000
B -0.968 1.907 1.000 0.250 0.664 2.033 0.166 0.508 -4.112
C -0.968 0.907 2.000 0.500 -0.043 1.326 -0.022 0.663 -4.915
D -0.968 0.000 2.907 0.727 -0.684 0.684 -0.497 0.497 -2.780
E -0.968 -0.968 3.875 0.969 -1.369 0.000 -1.326 0.000 2.501
F 0.000 -0.968 2.907 0.727 -0.684 -0.684 -0.497 -0.497 4.657
G 0.907 -0.968 2.000 0.500 -0.043 -1.326 -0.022 -0.663 4.996
H 1.907 -0.968 1.000 0.250 0.664 -2.033 0.166 -0.508 3.486
J 2.907 -0.968 0.000 0.000 1.371 -2.740 0.000 0.000 0.000
SHEAR AREA
Shear area was determined for the principal directions using the following
equations
𝐴𝐴𝑦𝑦′ =
𝑡𝑡𝐼𝐼𝑦𝑦′
2
∫ 𝑄𝑄𝑦𝑦′
2𝑏𝑏
𝑎𝑎
𝐴𝐴𝑧𝑧′ =
𝑡𝑡𝐼𝐼𝑧𝑧′
2
∫ 𝑄𝑄𝑧𝑧′
2𝑏𝑏
𝑎𝑎
MATLAB was used to perform the computations for shear area and results are as
follows
𝐴𝐴𝑦𝑦′ = 0.821 in2
𝐴𝐴𝑧𝑧′ = 0.809 in2
PAGE 6
A comparison was made to published values for shear area of an L4 x 4 x 1/4 angle
section and is presented in Table 4.
Table 4. Shear Area Comparison
Hand
(in2)
Published
(in2)
Percentage Error
(%)
𝐴𝐴𝑦𝑦′ 0.821 0.820 0.1
𝐴𝐴𝑧𝑧′ 0.809 0.833 2.88
TORSION
Since end load was applied through the shear center of the cross section, no
moment about the x-axis was generated (i.e., 𝑀𝑀1 = 0). Hence, no torsional stress
due to torsion should be present in the beam, theoretically.
DISPLACEMENT COMPUTATION
Translational displacements (𝑈𝑈1, 𝑈𝑈2, 𝑈𝑈3) and rotational displacements (𝑈𝑈4, 𝑈𝑈5, 𝑈𝑈6)
of the free end of the beam were computed in MATLAB using the following
equation
{𝑢𝑢} = [𝐹𝐹]{𝑓𝑓}
where [𝐹𝐹] is the flexibility matrix, presented previously, {𝑓𝑓} the force vector,
{𝑓𝑓} =
⎩
⎪
⎨
⎪
⎧
0
−36.63
−36.63
0
3077
−3077⎭
⎪
⎬
⎪
⎫
and {𝑢𝑢} the displacement vector.
The displacements resulting from the computation are given as
{𝑢𝑢} =
⎩
⎪
⎨
⎪
⎧
0
−1.4778
−.3736
0
. 008
−.0316 ⎭
⎪
⎬
⎪
⎫
PAGE 7
Figure 4 - Figure 6 show displacement results obtained from a 3-D beam model in
Abaqus, modeled with 20 elements along the length.
Figure 4. Displacement U1 – Abaqus
Figure 5. Displacement U2 – Abaqus
PAGE 8
Figure 6. Displacement U3 – Abaqus
The displacements U2 and U3 in Abaqus can be related to 𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈′ and 𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈′ in the
following way
𝑈𝑈𝑦𝑦′ = −𝑈𝑈3 cos 45° + 𝑈𝑈2 sin 45°
𝑈𝑈𝑧𝑧′ = 𝑈𝑈2 cos 45° + 𝑈𝑈3 sin 45°
Figure 7 and Figure 8 show displacement as a function of distance from the
clamped end in the y’ and z’ directions, respectively. The data was exported from
Abaqus and converted using relations just mentioned.
Figure 7. Uy' vs. distance
-0.70
-0.60
-0.50
-0.40
-0.30
-0.20
-0.10
0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100
Uy'(in)
x (in)
Uy'
PAGE 9
Figure 8. Uz' vs. distance
COMPARISON
Table 5 presents the comparison of the results obtained from MATLAB to those
obtained from Abaqus.
Table 5. Displacement Comparison
MATLAB Abaqus Percentage Error (%)
𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈 0 -1.46E-02 100
𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈′ -1.4778 -0.597 149
𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈′ -.3736 -0.150 147
𝜗𝜗𝑥𝑥 0 -3.2E-18 100
𝜗𝜗𝑦𝑦′ 0.008 9.422E-03 15.1
𝜗𝜗𝑧𝑧′ -0.0316 -5.65E-03 459
CONCLUSION
Hand computation of section properties is fairly straight forward and compare well
with values obtained from structural analysis or CAD software; however, getting
displacements computed via beam element formulation and flexibility method to
agree with those obtained from said software is much more difficult. In the latter
case, special care has to be taken while constructing the flexibility matrix and
accounting for location of shear center of cross section.
-0.16
-0.14
-0.12
-0.10
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100
Uz'(in)
x (in)
Uz'
PAGE 10
Appendix A
CIVE702 Midterm Report Combined
CIVE702 Midterm Report Combined
CIVE702 Midterm Report Combined
CIVE702 Midterm Report Combined
CIVE702 Midterm Report Combined
1
Table of Contents
Parameters ......................................................................................................................... 1
Force vector ....................................................................................................................... 1
Flexibility matrix ................................................................................................................ 2
Displacement vector ............................................................................................................ 2
Parameters
P = 51.8; % [lb]
L = 7*12; % [in]
% Material Properties
E = 1*10^7; % [psi]
G = 3.77*10^6; % [psi]
nu = 0.33;
% Areas [in^2]
Ax = 1.9375;
Ay = 0.821;
Az = 0.833;
% Second-area moments [in^4]
J = .0403;
Iy = 4.855;
Iz = 1.225;
% Shear center
Zsc = 0;
%Ysc = -1.36;
Ysc = 0;
% Angle to principal axes
theta = pi/4;
Force vector
F1-F3 in [lb], M1-M3 in [in-lb]
F1 = 0;
F2 = -P*cos(theta);
F3 = -P*sin(theta);
M1 = 0;
M2 = -F2*L;
M3 = F3*L;
f = [F1;F2;F3;M1;M2;M3]
f =
1.0e+03 *
0
-0.0366
-0.0366
Appendix B
2
0
3.0768
-3.0768
Flexibility matrix
F = zeros(6,6);
F(1,1) = L/(Ax*E);
F(2,2) = L/(G*Ay)+L^3/(3*E*Iz)+L*Zsc^2/(G*J);
F(2,3) = -L*Zsc*Ysc/(G*J);
F(2,4) = L*Zsc/(G*J);
F(2,6) = L^2/(2*E*Iz);
F(3,2) = F(2,3);
F(3,3) = L/(G*Az)+L^3/(3*E*Iy)+L*Ysc^2/(G*J);
F(3,4) = -L*Ysc/(G*J);
F(3,5) = -L^2/(2*E*Iy);
F(4,2) = F(2,4);
F(4,3) = F(3,4);
F(4,4) = L/(G*J);
F(5,3) = F(3,5);
F(5,5) = L/(E*Iy);
F(6,2) = F(2,6);
F(6,6) = L/(E*Iz);
F
F =
0.0000 0 0 0 0 0
0 0.0162 0 0 0 0.0003
0 0 0.0041 0 -0.0001 0
0 0 0 0.0006 0 0
0 0 -0.0001 0 0.0000 0
0 0.0003 0 0 0 0.0000
Displacement vector
u = F*f
u =
0
-1.4778
-0.3736
0
0.0080
-0.0316
1
Table of Contents
Symbolic variables .............................................................................................................. 1
Constants ........................................................................................................................... 1
Shear Area ......................................................................................................................... 1
Shear stress ........................................................................................................................ 2
Symbolic variables
syms y z
Constants
based on section geometry [units]
t = 0.25; % [in]
h1 = 3.75; % [in]
h2 = 4; % [in]
A1 = h1*t; % [in^2]
A2 = h2*t; % [in^2]
Ycg = (A1*t/2+A2*h2/2)/(A1+A2); % [in]
Zcg = (A1*(h1/2+t)+A2*t/2)/(A1+A2); % [in]
Zmax = h2-Zcg; % [in]
Ymax = h2-Ycg; % [in]
a1 = -Ycg+t; % [in]
a2 = -Ycg; % [in]
ybar = -Ycg+t/2; % [in]
zbar = -Ycg+t/2; % [in]
Iy_prime = 4.855; % [in^4]
Iz_prime = 1.225; % [in^4]
theta = pi/4; % [rad]
Shear Area
Computation Ay' and Az'
% Shear area for y', Ay_prime
Qy_prime_1 = t*(Zmax-z)*(ybar*cos(theta)+(Zmax+z)*sin(theta)/2);
Qy_prime_2 = t*(Ymax-y)*((Ymax+y)*cos(theta)/2+zbar*sin(theta));
Ay_prime = t*Iz_prime^2/...
(double(int(Qy_prime_1^2,z,a1,Zmax)+int(Qy_prime_2^2,y,a2,Zmax)))
% Shear area for z', Az_prime
Qz_prime_1 = t*(Zmax-z)*((Zmax+z)*cos(theta)/2-ybar*sin(theta));
Qz_prime_2 = t*(Ymax-y)*(zbar*cos(theta)-(Ymax+y)*sin(theta)/2);
Az_prime = t*Iy_prime^2/...
(double(int(Qz_prime_1^2,z,a1,Zmax)+int(Qz_prime_2^2,y,a2,Ymax)))
Appendix C
2
Ay_prime =
0.8202
Az_prime =
0.8094
Shear stress
Computation of Tau for rectangle 1 (vertical leg) and 2 (horizontal)
Vy_prime = -36.63;
Vz_prime = -36.63;
Tau1 = t*(Vy_prime*Qy_prime_1/Iz_prime+Vz_prime*Qz_prime_1/Iy_prime)
Tau2 = t*(Vy_prime*Qy_prime_2/Iz_prime+Vz_prime*Qz_prime_2/Iy_prime)
Tau1 =
(3663*(z/4 - 721/992)*((15*2^(1/2))/31 + (2^(1/2)*(z + 721/248))/4))/1942 - (3663*(
Tau2 =
- (3663*(y/4 - 721/992)*((15*2^(1/2))/31 - (2^(1/2)*(y + 721/248))/4))/490 - (3663*
Published with MATLAB® R2014b

More Related Content

PDF
FEM_Modeling_Project_Evaluation of a Steel Pulley and Shaft Design
PDF
Beginner's idea to Computer Aided Engineering - ANSYS
DOCX
FEM project # 2
PDF
Torque on Thin rod
PDF
An Advanced learning FEA, CAE - Ansys, Inventor CAM
PDF
Force of rotating system
PPTX
MAR-2020-Final
PDF
Mutt_Wind_Tunnel_Results_v2
FEM_Modeling_Project_Evaluation of a Steel Pulley and Shaft Design
Beginner's idea to Computer Aided Engineering - ANSYS
FEM project # 2
Torque on Thin rod
An Advanced learning FEA, CAE - Ansys, Inventor CAM
Force of rotating system
MAR-2020-Final
Mutt_Wind_Tunnel_Results_v2

What's hot (19)

PDF
AERO390Report_Xiang
PDF
MINI SLED CRASH PROJECT
PDF
ES3323 - Project 2 Report - Reverse Engineering a Gear Shaft
PDF
Shaft design Erdi Karaçal Mechanical Engineer University of Gaziantep
PDF
lab report structure deflection of cantilever
PDF
Girth flange load calculation using by fea techniques
PDF
NEW APPROACH FOR COMPUTER-AIDED STATIC BALANCING OF TURBINES ROTORS
PDF
Surveying problem solving
PDF
Aircraft Loads 5 Report
DOCX
Deflection of simply supported beam and cantilever
PDF
Solid mechanics 1 BDA 10903
PDF
Twice yield method for assessment of fatigue life assesment of pressure swing...
PDF
LAB REPORT SHEAR FORCE IN A BEAM
PDF
Mechanical Lifting machine | Design project | Mechanical Engineering Undergra...
PDF
Shi20396 ch18
PDF
Solid_Modeling_Project_#2_ Reverse engineering of a connecting rod and docume...
PDF
Study of Effect of Friction on the Pin of Pantograph Mechanism
DOC
thermal project # 2
PPTX
Experiment 6 MOS LAB
AERO390Report_Xiang
MINI SLED CRASH PROJECT
ES3323 - Project 2 Report - Reverse Engineering a Gear Shaft
Shaft design Erdi Karaçal Mechanical Engineer University of Gaziantep
lab report structure deflection of cantilever
Girth flange load calculation using by fea techniques
NEW APPROACH FOR COMPUTER-AIDED STATIC BALANCING OF TURBINES ROTORS
Surveying problem solving
Aircraft Loads 5 Report
Deflection of simply supported beam and cantilever
Solid mechanics 1 BDA 10903
Twice yield method for assessment of fatigue life assesment of pressure swing...
LAB REPORT SHEAR FORCE IN A BEAM
Mechanical Lifting machine | Design project | Mechanical Engineering Undergra...
Shi20396 ch18
Solid_Modeling_Project_#2_ Reverse engineering of a connecting rod and docume...
Study of Effect of Friction on the Pin of Pantograph Mechanism
thermal project # 2
Experiment 6 MOS LAB
Ad

Similar to CIVE702 Midterm Report Combined (20)

PDF
A Comparative Analysis of Structure of Machine Tool Component using Fuzzy Logic
DOCX
ME 5720 Fall 2015 - Wind Turbine Project_FINAL
PDF
Design And Analysis of Test Rig for Rudder Pedal
PDF
Vertical Screw Conveyor - Design Project
PDF
IRJET- Investigation of Stresses in Rear Half Axle of an Automobile
PDF
4 Shaft Design.pdf
PDF
ANALYSIS OF KNUCKLE JOINT
PDF
Computation of a gearbox for a wind power plant
PDF
Staircase Design Report
PDF
To develop algorithm to create node at desired location on beam using absorber
PPTX
Sustainable Manufacturing: Optimization of single pass Turning machining oper...
PDF
Shafts and Shafts Components
PPT
Engineering plant facilities 15 mechanics welding
PDF
IRJET- Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Rectangular, Tapered and Tapere...
PDF
Empirical relation to estimate the reduction of root fillet stress in spur ge...
PDF
IRJET - An Investigation of Stresses Induced in Curved Beams using MATLAB...
PDF
ANALYSIS OF CNC LATHE SPINDLE FOR MAXIMUM CUTTING FORCE CONDITION AND BEARING...
PDF
BENDING STRESS IN A BEAMS
PDF
Design of a Lift Mechanism for Disabled People
PDF
CSI ETABS & SAFE MANUAL: Slab Analysis and Design to EC2
A Comparative Analysis of Structure of Machine Tool Component using Fuzzy Logic
ME 5720 Fall 2015 - Wind Turbine Project_FINAL
Design And Analysis of Test Rig for Rudder Pedal
Vertical Screw Conveyor - Design Project
IRJET- Investigation of Stresses in Rear Half Axle of an Automobile
4 Shaft Design.pdf
ANALYSIS OF KNUCKLE JOINT
Computation of a gearbox for a wind power plant
Staircase Design Report
To develop algorithm to create node at desired location on beam using absorber
Sustainable Manufacturing: Optimization of single pass Turning machining oper...
Shafts and Shafts Components
Engineering plant facilities 15 mechanics welding
IRJET- Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Rectangular, Tapered and Tapere...
Empirical relation to estimate the reduction of root fillet stress in spur ge...
IRJET - An Investigation of Stresses Induced in Curved Beams using MATLAB...
ANALYSIS OF CNC LATHE SPINDLE FOR MAXIMUM CUTTING FORCE CONDITION AND BEARING...
BENDING STRESS IN A BEAMS
Design of a Lift Mechanism for Disabled People
CSI ETABS & SAFE MANUAL: Slab Analysis and Design to EC2
Ad

CIVE702 Midterm Report Combined

  • 1. CIVE 702 MIDTERM WINTER 2015 Cyle Teal CIVE 702 February 12, 2015
  • 2. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1 FLEXIBILITY MATRIX COMPUTATION ....................................................................2 Beam length ...............................................................................................................2 Geometric centroid....................................................................................................2 Principal Second Moments of Area...........................................................................2 Polar Second Moment of Area ..................................................................................2 Shear Center...............................................................................................................3 Material Properties ....................................................................................................3 Flexibility Matrix........................................................................................................3 SECTION PROPERTY COMPARISON.........................................................................3 Discussion ..................................................................................................................4 STRESS COMPUTATION.............................................................................................4 Bending.......................................................................................................................4 Shear Stress ................................................................................................................5 Shear Area ..................................................................................................................6 Torsion........................................................................................................................7 DISPLACEMENT COMPUTATION .............................................................................7 Comparison .............................................................................................................. 10 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................ 10
  • 3. INTRODUCTION The cantilevered beam shown in Figure 1, an L4x4 angle with length of 84 inches, was analyzed in the following steps: 1. Section properties, specifically, principal second moments of area, geometric centroid and shear center, were computed by hand. Hand results were compared with results obtained from SolidWorks. 2. Stress distributions due to shear, bending and torsion were computed by hand. Also, the principle of virtual forces was leveraged to compute the shear areas of the cross section, and this result was compared with values published for this cross section1. 3. The three displacements (𝑈𝑈1, 𝑈𝑈2, 𝑈𝑈3) and three rotations (𝑈𝑈4, 𝑈𝑈5, 𝑈𝑈6) of the cantilever tip, induced by a vertical force applied to the free end of the beam and through the shear center, were computed using the generalized beam element formulation. MATLAB was used for matrix computation and results were compared to those obtained from a 3-D beam element model in Abaqus. In all steps, percentage errors were computed from the comparison and values were reported in table format. Figure 1. L4x4x1/4 Aluminum Alloy, Grade 6061-76, cantilevered beam 1 Zureick, A., Emkin, L., Gwangseok, N., Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Materials Research Report No. 07-1, February 2007 PAGE 1
  • 4. Figure 2. L4x4 Cross Section Dimensions FLEXIBILITY MATRIX COMPUTATION All computations for the property values presented hereafter can be found in Appendix A. BEAM LENGTH Beam length, 𝐿𝐿, was given in the problem statement as 84 inches. GEOMETRIC CENTROID Geometric centroid was computed to be 𝑦𝑦� = 𝑧𝑧̅ = 1.093 in., relative to bottom left corner of section. PRINCIPAL SECOND MOMENTS OF AREA The angle of rotation that relates the coordinate system shown in Figure 1 to the principal coordinate system was computed to be 𝜗𝜗 = 45°. Using this value, principal second area moments for the y’ and z’ axis were computed to be 𝐼𝐼𝑦𝑦′ = 4.855 in4 and 𝐼𝐼𝑦𝑦′ = 1.225 in4 . POLAR SECOND MOMENT OF AREA 𝐽𝐽 = .0403 in4 Y Z PAGE 2
  • 5. SHEAR CENTER The following values for location of the shear center are given in the principal coordinate system with origin located at geometric centroid 𝑦𝑦𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 = −1.369 in 𝑧𝑧𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 = 0 in MATERIAL PROPERTIES Modulus of Elasticity, Shear Modulus, and Poisson’s ratio for Grade 6061-T6 aluminum obtained from asm.matweb.com 𝐸𝐸 = 10E + 07 psi 𝐺𝐺 = 3.77E + 06 psi 𝜈𝜈 = 0.33 FLEXIBILITY MATRIX A MATLAB script was used, see Appendix B, to generate the following flexibility matrix for a general beam element with the properties presented above 4.34E-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.016155 0 0 0 0.000288 [𝐹𝐹] = 0 0 0.004096 0 -7.3E-05 0 0 0 0 0.000553 0 0 0 0 -7.3E-05 0 1.73E-06 0 0 0.000288 0 0 0 6.86E-06 SECTION PROPERTY COMPARISON As stated in the introduction, the section property values for L4x4 angle were obtained by hand and compared to those obtained from modeling the section in SolidWorks and online sources. The comparison, including percentage errors, is presented in Table 1. PAGE 3
  • 6. Table 1. Section Property Value Comparison Property Hand SolidWorks Percentage Error (%) 𝑦𝑦� 1.093 in 1.0723 in 1.93 𝑧𝑧̅ 1.093 in 1.0723 in 1.93 𝐼𝐼𝑦𝑦′ 4.855 in4 4.7333 in4 2.57 𝐼𝐼𝑧𝑧′ 1.225 in4 1.2245 in4 4.08E-02 𝐽𝐽 .0403 in4 .0404 in4 (1) 0.25 1. SolidWorks’ value differed greatly, so obtained value of 0.0404 from Zureick et al., 2007 DISCUSSION The percentage errors for all section properties were acceptable. The main reason for the observed differences is the cross section was modeled in SolidWorks with fillets of 𝑅𝑅 = 0.375 in at the edge formed by the joining of the two legs and 𝑅𝑅 = 0.25 in at the end of the legs. The addition of material in the region were the edges meet and the subtraction of material at the end of the legs causes a change in section properties. STRESS COMPUTATION Derivation of the equations presented in this section can be found in Appendix A BENDING Axial stress due to bending in the principle coordinate system is given by 𝜎𝜎𝑥𝑥 = 688.78𝑧𝑧′ + 2511.8𝑦𝑦′ psi Table 2 presents values for axial stress at the locations shown in Figure 3. Table 2. Axial Stress at Select Locations Point 𝒚𝒚 𝒛𝒛 𝒚𝒚′ 𝒛𝒛′ 𝝈𝝈𝒙𝒙 (psi) A -0.968 2.907 1.37108 2.740039 5180.461 B -0.968 0.907 -0.04313 1.325825 731.9387 C -0.968 -0.968 -1.36896 0 -3438.55 D 0.907 -0.968 -0.04313 -1.32583 -948.624 E 2.907 -0.968 1.37108 -2.74004 1707.297 PAGE 4
  • 7. Figure 3. Locations for Stress Computation SHEAR STRESS For a principal coordinate system, shear flow is given by 𝜏𝜏𝜏𝜏 = 𝑉𝑉𝑦𝑦′ 𝑄𝑄𝑧𝑧′ 𝐼𝐼𝑧𝑧′ + 𝑉𝑉𝑧𝑧′ 𝑄𝑄𝑦𝑦′ 𝐼𝐼𝑦𝑦′ The equations for 𝑄𝑄𝑦𝑦′ and 𝑄𝑄𝑧𝑧′ were computed for each rectangle of the cross section in MATLAB, see Appendix C. Vertical leg 𝑄𝑄𝑦𝑦′ = � 𝑧𝑧̅ 4 − 2907 4000 � � 121√2 250 − √2�𝑧𝑧̿ + 2907 1000� � 4 � , −.843 ≤ 𝑧𝑧̅ ≤ 2.907 𝑄𝑄𝑧𝑧′ = − � 𝑧𝑧̅ 4 − 2907 4000 � � 121√2 250 + √2�𝑧𝑧̿ + 2907 1000� � 4 � , −.843 ≤ 𝑧𝑧̅ ≤ 2.907 Horizontal leg 𝑄𝑄𝑦𝑦′ = � 𝑦𝑦� 4 − 2907 4000 � � 121√2 250 − √2�𝑦𝑦� + 2907 1000� � 4 � , −1.093 ≤ 𝑦𝑦� ≤ 2.907 A C B D E 𝒛𝒛 𝒚𝒚 PAGE 5
  • 8. 𝑄𝑄𝑧𝑧′ = � 𝑦𝑦� 4 − 2907 4000 � � 121√2 250 + √2�𝑦𝑦� + 2907 1000� � 4 � , −1.093 ≤ 𝑦𝑦� ≤ 2.907 Shear stress was computed for eight locations in the cross section and is presented in the following table. Table 3. Shear Stress at Select Locations Point 𝒚𝒚� (in) 𝒛𝒛� (in) 𝒍𝒍 (in) 𝑨𝑨 (in2) 𝒚𝒚′ (in) 𝒛𝒛′ (in) 𝑸𝑸𝒚𝒚′ (in3) 𝑸𝑸𝒛𝒛′ (in3) 𝝉𝝉 (psi) A -0.968 2.907 0.000 0.000 1.371 2.740 0.000 0.000 0.000 B -0.968 1.907 1.000 0.250 0.664 2.033 0.166 0.508 -4.112 C -0.968 0.907 2.000 0.500 -0.043 1.326 -0.022 0.663 -4.915 D -0.968 0.000 2.907 0.727 -0.684 0.684 -0.497 0.497 -2.780 E -0.968 -0.968 3.875 0.969 -1.369 0.000 -1.326 0.000 2.501 F 0.000 -0.968 2.907 0.727 -0.684 -0.684 -0.497 -0.497 4.657 G 0.907 -0.968 2.000 0.500 -0.043 -1.326 -0.022 -0.663 4.996 H 1.907 -0.968 1.000 0.250 0.664 -2.033 0.166 -0.508 3.486 J 2.907 -0.968 0.000 0.000 1.371 -2.740 0.000 0.000 0.000 SHEAR AREA Shear area was determined for the principal directions using the following equations 𝐴𝐴𝑦𝑦′ = 𝑡𝑡𝐼𝐼𝑦𝑦′ 2 ∫ 𝑄𝑄𝑦𝑦′ 2𝑏𝑏 𝑎𝑎 𝐴𝐴𝑧𝑧′ = 𝑡𝑡𝐼𝐼𝑧𝑧′ 2 ∫ 𝑄𝑄𝑧𝑧′ 2𝑏𝑏 𝑎𝑎 MATLAB was used to perform the computations for shear area and results are as follows 𝐴𝐴𝑦𝑦′ = 0.821 in2 𝐴𝐴𝑧𝑧′ = 0.809 in2 PAGE 6
  • 9. A comparison was made to published values for shear area of an L4 x 4 x 1/4 angle section and is presented in Table 4. Table 4. Shear Area Comparison Hand (in2) Published (in2) Percentage Error (%) 𝐴𝐴𝑦𝑦′ 0.821 0.820 0.1 𝐴𝐴𝑧𝑧′ 0.809 0.833 2.88 TORSION Since end load was applied through the shear center of the cross section, no moment about the x-axis was generated (i.e., 𝑀𝑀1 = 0). Hence, no torsional stress due to torsion should be present in the beam, theoretically. DISPLACEMENT COMPUTATION Translational displacements (𝑈𝑈1, 𝑈𝑈2, 𝑈𝑈3) and rotational displacements (𝑈𝑈4, 𝑈𝑈5, 𝑈𝑈6) of the free end of the beam were computed in MATLAB using the following equation {𝑢𝑢} = [𝐹𝐹]{𝑓𝑓} where [𝐹𝐹] is the flexibility matrix, presented previously, {𝑓𝑓} the force vector, {𝑓𝑓} = ⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ 0 −36.63 −36.63 0 3077 −3077⎭ ⎪ ⎬ ⎪ ⎫ and {𝑢𝑢} the displacement vector. The displacements resulting from the computation are given as {𝑢𝑢} = ⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ 0 −1.4778 −.3736 0 . 008 −.0316 ⎭ ⎪ ⎬ ⎪ ⎫ PAGE 7
  • 10. Figure 4 - Figure 6 show displacement results obtained from a 3-D beam model in Abaqus, modeled with 20 elements along the length. Figure 4. Displacement U1 – Abaqus Figure 5. Displacement U2 – Abaqus PAGE 8
  • 11. Figure 6. Displacement U3 – Abaqus The displacements U2 and U3 in Abaqus can be related to 𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈′ and 𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈′ in the following way 𝑈𝑈𝑦𝑦′ = −𝑈𝑈3 cos 45° + 𝑈𝑈2 sin 45° 𝑈𝑈𝑧𝑧′ = 𝑈𝑈2 cos 45° + 𝑈𝑈3 sin 45° Figure 7 and Figure 8 show displacement as a function of distance from the clamped end in the y’ and z’ directions, respectively. The data was exported from Abaqus and converted using relations just mentioned. Figure 7. Uy' vs. distance -0.70 -0.60 -0.50 -0.40 -0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0 20 40 60 80 100 Uy'(in) x (in) Uy' PAGE 9
  • 12. Figure 8. Uz' vs. distance COMPARISON Table 5 presents the comparison of the results obtained from MATLAB to those obtained from Abaqus. Table 5. Displacement Comparison MATLAB Abaqus Percentage Error (%) 𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈 0 -1.46E-02 100 𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈′ -1.4778 -0.597 149 𝑈𝑈𝑈𝑈′ -.3736 -0.150 147 𝜗𝜗𝑥𝑥 0 -3.2E-18 100 𝜗𝜗𝑦𝑦′ 0.008 9.422E-03 15.1 𝜗𝜗𝑧𝑧′ -0.0316 -5.65E-03 459 CONCLUSION Hand computation of section properties is fairly straight forward and compare well with values obtained from structural analysis or CAD software; however, getting displacements computed via beam element formulation and flexibility method to agree with those obtained from said software is much more difficult. In the latter case, special care has to be taken while constructing the flexibility matrix and accounting for location of shear center of cross section. -0.16 -0.14 -0.12 -0.10 -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0 20 40 60 80 100 Uz'(in) x (in) Uz' PAGE 10
  • 19. 1 Table of Contents Parameters ......................................................................................................................... 1 Force vector ....................................................................................................................... 1 Flexibility matrix ................................................................................................................ 2 Displacement vector ............................................................................................................ 2 Parameters P = 51.8; % [lb] L = 7*12; % [in] % Material Properties E = 1*10^7; % [psi] G = 3.77*10^6; % [psi] nu = 0.33; % Areas [in^2] Ax = 1.9375; Ay = 0.821; Az = 0.833; % Second-area moments [in^4] J = .0403; Iy = 4.855; Iz = 1.225; % Shear center Zsc = 0; %Ysc = -1.36; Ysc = 0; % Angle to principal axes theta = pi/4; Force vector F1-F3 in [lb], M1-M3 in [in-lb] F1 = 0; F2 = -P*cos(theta); F3 = -P*sin(theta); M1 = 0; M2 = -F2*L; M3 = F3*L; f = [F1;F2;F3;M1;M2;M3] f = 1.0e+03 * 0 -0.0366 -0.0366 Appendix B
  • 20. 2 0 3.0768 -3.0768 Flexibility matrix F = zeros(6,6); F(1,1) = L/(Ax*E); F(2,2) = L/(G*Ay)+L^3/(3*E*Iz)+L*Zsc^2/(G*J); F(2,3) = -L*Zsc*Ysc/(G*J); F(2,4) = L*Zsc/(G*J); F(2,6) = L^2/(2*E*Iz); F(3,2) = F(2,3); F(3,3) = L/(G*Az)+L^3/(3*E*Iy)+L*Ysc^2/(G*J); F(3,4) = -L*Ysc/(G*J); F(3,5) = -L^2/(2*E*Iy); F(4,2) = F(2,4); F(4,3) = F(3,4); F(4,4) = L/(G*J); F(5,3) = F(3,5); F(5,5) = L/(E*Iy); F(6,2) = F(2,6); F(6,6) = L/(E*Iz); F F = 0.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0162 0 0 0 0.0003 0 0 0.0041 0 -0.0001 0 0 0 0 0.0006 0 0 0 0 -0.0001 0 0.0000 0 0 0.0003 0 0 0 0.0000 Displacement vector u = F*f u = 0 -1.4778 -0.3736 0 0.0080 -0.0316
  • 21. 1 Table of Contents Symbolic variables .............................................................................................................. 1 Constants ........................................................................................................................... 1 Shear Area ......................................................................................................................... 1 Shear stress ........................................................................................................................ 2 Symbolic variables syms y z Constants based on section geometry [units] t = 0.25; % [in] h1 = 3.75; % [in] h2 = 4; % [in] A1 = h1*t; % [in^2] A2 = h2*t; % [in^2] Ycg = (A1*t/2+A2*h2/2)/(A1+A2); % [in] Zcg = (A1*(h1/2+t)+A2*t/2)/(A1+A2); % [in] Zmax = h2-Zcg; % [in] Ymax = h2-Ycg; % [in] a1 = -Ycg+t; % [in] a2 = -Ycg; % [in] ybar = -Ycg+t/2; % [in] zbar = -Ycg+t/2; % [in] Iy_prime = 4.855; % [in^4] Iz_prime = 1.225; % [in^4] theta = pi/4; % [rad] Shear Area Computation Ay' and Az' % Shear area for y', Ay_prime Qy_prime_1 = t*(Zmax-z)*(ybar*cos(theta)+(Zmax+z)*sin(theta)/2); Qy_prime_2 = t*(Ymax-y)*((Ymax+y)*cos(theta)/2+zbar*sin(theta)); Ay_prime = t*Iz_prime^2/... (double(int(Qy_prime_1^2,z,a1,Zmax)+int(Qy_prime_2^2,y,a2,Zmax))) % Shear area for z', Az_prime Qz_prime_1 = t*(Zmax-z)*((Zmax+z)*cos(theta)/2-ybar*sin(theta)); Qz_prime_2 = t*(Ymax-y)*(zbar*cos(theta)-(Ymax+y)*sin(theta)/2); Az_prime = t*Iy_prime^2/... (double(int(Qz_prime_1^2,z,a1,Zmax)+int(Qz_prime_2^2,y,a2,Ymax))) Appendix C
  • 22. 2 Ay_prime = 0.8202 Az_prime = 0.8094 Shear stress Computation of Tau for rectangle 1 (vertical leg) and 2 (horizontal) Vy_prime = -36.63; Vz_prime = -36.63; Tau1 = t*(Vy_prime*Qy_prime_1/Iz_prime+Vz_prime*Qz_prime_1/Iy_prime) Tau2 = t*(Vy_prime*Qy_prime_2/Iz_prime+Vz_prime*Qz_prime_2/Iy_prime) Tau1 = (3663*(z/4 - 721/992)*((15*2^(1/2))/31 + (2^(1/2)*(z + 721/248))/4))/1942 - (3663*( Tau2 = - (3663*(y/4 - 721/992)*((15*2^(1/2))/31 - (2^(1/2)*(y + 721/248))/4))/490 - (3663* Published with MATLAB® R2014b