This document summarizes a study that quantitatively analyzed the performance of the Snort and Suricata intrusion detection systems. The authors developed a testing framework involving over 8000 tests of the two systems using different rulesets, configurations, workloads and core counts. Initial results showed Suricata's performance dropping at 4 cores, while Snort maintained consistent single-threaded performance. Feedback from the Open Information Security Foundation and Snort.org led to configuration changes that improved Suricata's threading and implemented parallelization for Snort. Further results sections provide additional details on the comparative performance of Snort and Suricata under different testing conditions.