Co-creation - what, why and (a bit about) how
0 likes573 views
This document discusses the concept of co-creation in the context of learning and education. It begins by defining co-creation as active collaboration between stakeholders where all parties contribute knowledge to create a shared solution. It then provides examples of co-creation from an NVL pilot project in Finland. The document considers how co-creation impacts aspects of learning like content, roles, and didactic design. It analyzes similarities between cases in the NVL project and discusses how co-creation can be a learning process in itself through experience and facilitating boundary encounters between perspectives.
![7
2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
NEW ROLES AND PERCEPTIONS OF SELF
I: okay… What do you get out of taking part in this?
NN: there you pull some threads – you have influence
yourself. So your opinion matters.
I: What do you get out of it?
NN: It's important, after all. So I'm not just a participant
or a companion. So I also help create the road, instead of
following the road. [...] You learn to create something.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/cocreationnvlaakjaer2019small-191126161743/85/Co-creation-what-why-and-a-bit-about-how-7-320.jpg)
Co-creation - what, why and (a bit about) how
- 2. Contact: Marie Aakjær | maaa@pha.dk
- 3. • What do we mean by co-creation? • Why does the concept emerge? why is it relevant? • Example from NVL pilot project • Considerations on co-creation and implications on content, roles, etc. in didactic designs
- 4. 2016 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 5. AARHUS UNIVERSITY Social Innovation in the Prison Service Marie Aakjær 2014
- 6. 6 NN: We usually do ... or we don't really make it that way. But when we finally do - for example, here we have the Summer Olympics there - and then a man arranges it all. And that's the only thing I can relate to. But ... there we do nothing. So we are not involved in the games or we are not involved in what to do or ... we are just participants. NEW ROLES AND PERCEPTIONS OF SELF 2016 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D. 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 7. 7 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D. NEW ROLES AND PERCEPTIONS OF SELF I: okay… What do you get out of taking part in this? NN: there you pull some threads – you have influence yourself. So your opinion matters. I: What do you get out of it? NN: It's important, after all. So I'm not just a participant or a companion. So I also help create the road, instead of following the road. [...] You learn to create something.
- 8. Global trends • From hierarchies to more horizontal relationships (family, organizations, between the state & citizens) • Technological development • International competition • Pressure on public budgets (Meijer, 2014) 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 9. http://b.bimg.dk/ https://youtu.be/t7-CERo-_qM Copenhagen 2. juli 2011 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 10. Foto fra www.danskbeton.dk RABALDERPARKEN, ROSKILDE 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 11. CITIZEN PUBLIC AGENCY SERVICE + CONTROL Welfare system 1.0 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 12. WELFARE SYSTEM 2.0 FAMILY, FRIENDS, NETWORK PRIVATE COMPANIES, NGO’S & CIVIL SOCIETY PUBLIC AGENCY OTHER PUBLIC PARTNERS CITIZEN 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 13. CO-CREATION – what are we talking about? ? 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 14. • Active collaboration between various stakeholder groups • The ‘challenge’ is shared (cannot be owned by a single party) • All parties contribute resources, especially in the form of knowledge • Synergy: The product/result of co-creation cannot be created or achieved without the total sum of participants Co-creation – in my understanding 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 15. CO-CREATION: THEORETICALLY A RICH MIX PSYCHOLOGY MARKETING & BUSINESS PUCLIC MANAGEMENT DESIGN MANAGEMT INNOVATION 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D. CO-CREATION (e.g. Degnegaard, 2014)
- 16. OPEN INNOVATION (Chesbrough 2003) Unknown market Projects Projects Known market 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 17. Citizen Change | The Laundry 14. november 2019 17 "How do we create a training ground for mental disabled people to help them enter a working community?" http://sagerdersamler.dk/sager/vaskeriet-en-oevebane-for-udviklingshaemmede/ https://youtu.be/8WbC6rTUdvQ
- 18. INNOVATION of the concept of innovation Tech-driven Marked-driven Socially driven 50-70’ties Consumption Production Products Hardware Passive users/consumers Tech innovation 80-00’ties Experience Marketing/Branding Emotions Service Active users User driven innovation 2005 - Transformation Business & models of collaboration Processes Network Co-creators Employee driven innovation Open innovation Social innovation2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 19. NVL – Helsinki 2014
- 20. Co-creation & NVL “an approach to collaboration and innovation, which seeks to bring together people with diverse backgrounds in co- creation of sustainable and meaningful solutions for new learning experiences or environments for learning.” (Aakjær 2014)
- 21. 4 Levels of co-creation in learning (Aakjær 2014, adapted from Buchanan 1992) 1. Topic, content 2. Curriculum and topics 3. Organisation of activities, including didactics 4. Complex systems, environments or arenas for living, working, playing and learning
- 22. Qualities of a co-creational approach to learning and teaching (Bovill, 2014) • increased engagement and motivation • awareness of meta-cognitive perspectives • enhanced learning experiences ANALYSIS A CO-CREATIONAL APPROACH TO LEARNING 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 23. Co-creation pushes conceptions of: • ‘Problem’ definition • Expert- and ’user’ roles and knowledge • Responsibility and influence • Ideas or degrees of completeness • Boundaries: individual, professional, sector
- 24. In a co-creation approach, participants are addressed not as receivers of information, but as shapers of knowledge. CO-CREATION & learning 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 25. To which extend can participants (here in the meaning the ‘learner’ or ‘student’) influence the frames and content? • ‘Frames’ may include structure, time, legislation, process, order and sequence of activities • ‘Content’ may include topic, actors or participants and approach ANALYSIS CO-CREATION & NVL 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 26. ! ! User/challenge, driven,or,co1 created,content, Pre1defined, curriculum,, Cross, organisational, boundaries, Diversity,in, knowledge, domains, Individual/, social,focus, Learning1 by1doing, Aesthetic, learning, processes, Open, Arena, x! #! x! x! Social! x! x! IFS, x! #! x! x! Individual! x! #! Pro, Academy, x! x! x! x! Individual/! social! x! #! IBC, x! #! x! x! Social! x! x! Biophilia, #! x! x! x! Individual! x! x! ! ANALYSIS NVL CASES - SIMILARITIES? 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 27. ANALYSIS NVL CASES - SIMILARITIES? TOPIC /CURRICULUM DRIVEN USER/CHALLENGE DRIVEN TEACHER / EXPERT(TEACHER AS) FACILITATER Pro Academy IBC Open Arena Biophilia IFS Key words: • Agency • Identity formation • Motivation • Responsibility • Drive 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 28. CO- CREATION AS A LEARNING PROCESS Co-creation cannot be taught through lecturing, but a learning process can be facilitated by setting the context (Darsø, 2014) • Co-creation skills are developed and learned through experience (action learning) 2016 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D.
- 29. ANALYSIS | NVL-project PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH • Based in participants practice, challenges and motivation • Experience based • Co-creational approach • Experimental approach • Visible meaning for participants • Awareness and responsibility Learning by doing (Dewey, 1969) Experiential learning (Kolb, 1985)
- 30. • Through boundary encounters • Dialogue between multiple perspectives • Horizontal (as complementary to vertical) • Through action • A facilitated process 30 HOW DOES LEARNING TAKE PLACE IN CO-CREATION? 2019 | Marie Aakjær | Ph.D. Aakjær, M. (2018). Co-design in the prison service – A learning perspective on employee- driven innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management (IJEIM), 2018, Vol. 22 No. 4/5
- 31. Innovation competency (Darsø, 2012) Mastering social interaction that enhances innovation • Leadership • Communication • Facilitation Intra-innovative competency Socio- innovative competency Consciousness and sensitivity in relation to own and others’ talents, preferences and potentials for development and innovation • Inner transformation • Conscious awareness of self and others
- 32. How might we work with co-creation? 1. How Might We work with equality in co-creation? 2. HMW create a flexible framework for contributing and participating? 3. What can support us in working with dynamic processes where the goal, or the path to the goal, is not necessarily known? 4. HMW create a mutual openness, where one is curious and open to the project to be co-created? 5. HMW create a shared commitment with the actors involved so that we lift in droves? Model & inspiration from Sund by Netværket https://sund-by- net.dk/?s=samskabelse