SlideShare a Scribd company logo
CONCEPTS OF RIDGE AUGMENTATION
Dr R VISWA CHANDRA MDS;DNB
Professor and Head
Department of Periodontics
SVSIDS, Mahabubnagar, TS
“The lesser the indication, the greater the complication”
Basal bone
is stable
Alveolar
bone
resorbs
predictably
*Supporting Alveolar Bone *Alveolar Bone Proper *Bundle Bone
Tal H et al. pp 139-184 in “Bone Regeneration”; Intech Open
Botticelli, D., Berglundh, T. & Lindhe, J. (2004). Journal of Clinical Periodontology 31, 820–828
*
**
DISUSE ATROPHY
Paper thin
buccal
cortical bone
56% 27%
1.9mm 0.8mm
**
*
*Supporting Alveolar Bone *Alveolar Bone Proper *Bundle Bone
J.Pietrokovski, M.Massler. Journal of Dental Research, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 222–231, 1967
Phase 1
Vertical Loss
Phase 2
Horizontal Loss
30%
3 months
50%
12 months
1.2mm
B/L disparity
Schropp, L., et al. (2003). International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 23, 313–323.
ANATOMIC
Gingiva thickness
Socket anatomy
Socket number
Ridge density
Atwood DA, Coy WA. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 26(3): 280-95
Age
Nutritional
Hormonal
METABOLIC
FUNCTIONAL
Intensity
Duration
Frequency
of the Forces
PROSTHETIC
Prosthesis involved
RIDGEPRESERVATION Socket preservation or
ARP reduces bone loss after tooth extraction to preserve
the dental alveolus in the alveolar bone.
AUGMENTATION Predictable procedure to recreate
and regenerate hard and soft tissues lost due to
extraction or any other reason.
CORRECTION Any procedure designed to establish the
best hard and soft tissue contour over the alveolar bone.
Tolstunov L, Journal of Oral Implantology. 2014;40(S1):365-370.
SEIBERT, 1983
Lateral/Horizontal defects/Class I
Vertical defects/Class II
Combined/Class III
ALLEN, 1985
Tolstunov L, Journal of Oral Implantology. 2014;40(S1):365-370.
Hourglass ridge
Tolstunov L, Journal of Oral Implantology. 2014;40(S1):365-370.
10-POINT RIDGE ASSESSMENT
1 Type of grafting
2 Graft Resorption
3 Donor site morbidity
4 Recipient site morbidity
5 Wound closure
6 Buccal flap
7 Wound healing
8 Immediate implant placement
9 Delayed implant placement
10 Environmental factors
1. TYPE Of GRAFTING
1-TYPEOfGRAFTING
Jamjoom A, Cohen RE. Grafts for ridge preservation. J Funct Biomater 2015;6:833-48.
1-TYPEOfGRAFTING
Jamjoom A, Cohen RE. Grafts for ridge preservation. J Funct Biomater 2015;6:833-48.
Tolstunov L, Journal of Oral Implantology. 2014;40(S1):365-370.
1-TYPEOfGRAFTING
Ridge
width
>10 8-10
Minimal
6-8
Mild
4-6
Moderate
2-4
Severe
<2
Extreme
6-10/2-4
Hourglass
2-4/6-10
Bottleneck
RIDGE
ANATOMY
THERAPYOF
CHOICE
NOT
INDICATED
RARELY
INDICATED
GBR
or
RIDGE SPLIT
RIDGE SPLIT RIDGE SPLIT
or
BLOCK
GRAFT
EXTRAORAL
BLOCK
GRAFT
MIDLEVEL
GBR
RIDGE
RESHAPING
IMMEDIATE
INSERTION
YES YES YES/NO YES/NO
NOT
RECOMMENDED
NO YES/NO YES
1-TYPEOfGRAFTING
External defect*
Internal defect*
Sinus defect
Cologne Classification of Alveolar Ridge Defects (CCARD)
Consensus paper at the 8th European Consensus Conference (EuCC)
CologneClassificationofAlveolarRidgeDefects(CCARD)
Consensuspaperatthe8thEuropeanConsensusConference(EuCC)
1-TYPEOfGRAFTING
CologneClassificationofAlveolarRidgeDefects(CCARD)
Consensuspaperatthe8thEuropeanConsensusConference(EuCC)
1-TYPEOfGRAFTING
H.1.e V.3.i +S.3
CologneClassificationofAlveolarRidgeDefects(CCARD)
Consensuspaperatthe8thEuropeanConsensusConference(EuCC)
1-TYPEOfGRAFTING
Concepts of ridge augmentation
1-TYPEOfGRAFTING
How effective are different ridge augmentation
strategies at resolving alveolar ridge deficiencies
prior to staged or simultaneous approach
with dental implant placement?
1-TYPEOfGRAFTING
Staged Immediate
MOST
SUCCESSFUL
MOST
COMMONLY
DONE
MOST
SUCCESSFUL
MOST
COMMONLY
DONE
GBR procedure +
Graft + Growth
Factor
(>95%)
Bone block
augmentation
Block exposure in
16% of cases
GBR procedure +
Autologous Bone
Graft
(>95%)
Ridge expansion
Regrafting
required in 0% to
23.5% of cases
Horizontal defects
Vertical defects-Maxilla1-TYPEOfGRAFTING
Vertical defects-Mandible
To Graft or Not to Graft? Evidence-Based Guide to Decision Making in Oral Bone Graft Surgery
Bernhard Pommer, Werner Zechner, Georg Watzek and Richard Palmer
Ridge expansion by Splitting- 6 months follow up
Implant after extraction- 6 months follow up
Vertical Augmentation
Novebone® Putty + NBR
6 months follow up
2. GRAFT RESORPTION
2-GRAFTRESORPTION
HAEMATOMA
INFLAMMATION
VASULARIZATION
OSTEOCLASTIC ACTIVITY
BONE FORMATION
Infection, Micro
motion of the graft
↑inflammation
In Cortical grafts,
vascularization is
slower and occurs
along Haversian Canals.
In cancellous bone, it is
because of Creeping
Substitution.
2-GRAFTRESORPTION
To Graft or Not to Graft? Evidence-Based Guide to Decision Making in Oral Bone Graft Surgery
Bernhard Pommer, Werner Zechner, Georg Watzek and Richard Palmer
3. DONOR SITE MORBIDITY
Weibull L, Widmark G, Ivanoff CJ, Borg E, Rasmusson L.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Jun;11(2):149-57.
Soft tissue sensitivity “wooden teeth” 7.6%
Local radiographic changes around normal teeth 1.7%
Apical pathologies around normal teeth 1%
Weibull L, Widmark G, Ivanoff CJ, Borg E, Rasmusson L.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Jun;11(2):149-57.
Bone healing after chin graft harvesting NEVER regenerates to the
preoperative level. The donor site shows good remineralization but
leaves a radiologic concavity in the majority of cases.
3-DONORSITEMORBIDITY
4. RECEPIENT SITE MORBIDITY
To Graft or Not to Graft? Evidence-Based Guide to Decision Making in Oral Bone Graft Surgery
Bernhard Pommer, Werner Zechner, Georg Watzek and Richard Palmer
BLOCK EXPOSURE
Lateral Block Augmentation
In 65% of the cases with block exposure, inability
to obtain primary closure is the main cause.
Tolstunov L, Hicke B. Journal of Oral Implantology. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-0011.
4-RECEPIENTSITEMORBIDITY
4-RECEPIENTSITEMORBIDITY4-RECEPIENTSITEMORBIDITY
3x4 mm exposure results in 45% graft resorption.
4x5 mm exposure results in 75% graft resorption.
AlGhamdi AS. Saudi Med J. 2013 Jun;34(6):609-15.
BLOCK EXPOSURE
Vertical Block Augmentation
4-RECEPIENTSITEMORBIDITY
GBR EXPOSURE
4-RECEPIENTSITEMORBIDITY
GBR EXPOSURE
Primary closure of the flaps and an unexposed
membrane are vital for success in GBR.
Kim Y, Kim TK, Leem DH. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(5):1113-8. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3586.
4-RECEPIENTSITEMORBIDITY
GBR EXPOSURE
5–45% membrane exposure.
In 45% of the affected cases, outcome is affected
Lindfors LT, Tervonen EA, Sándor GK, Ylikontiola LP. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jun;109(6):825-30.
10 days
4-RECEPIENTSITEMORBIDITY
GBR EXPOSURE-EMERGING CONCEPTS
Is primary
closure
an absolute
necessity in
GBR?
Can there be
exposure resistant
GBR and
membranes which
cause no exposure
at all?
4-RECEPIENTSITEMORBIDITY GBR EXPOSURE- OPEN GBR CONCEPT*
*Rosen PS, Rosen AD. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Jan;34(1):34-8, 40.
PRIMARY CLOSURE IN EXTRACTION SOCKETS MAY LEAD TO
Altering the amount of keratinized tissue
Altering soft-tissue landmarks
Increased pain, swelling or paraesthesia
ProTiss®
4-RECEPIENTSITEMORBIDITY GBR EXPOSURE
Natural BR* vs GBR
Marco Del Corso, Alain Vervelle, Alain Simonpieri, Ryo Jimbo, Francesco Inchingolo, Gilberto Sammartino and David M. Dohan Eh renfest.
Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 2012, 13, 1207-1230
Cell-proof barrierBioactive barrier (L-PRF)
NBR is the clot itself Stabilize the blood clot
Might delay gingival
healing
Repair the gingival tissue
EGF
4-RECEPIENTSITEMORBIDITY GBR EXPOSURE
Natural BR vs GBR
4-RECEPIENTSITEMORBIDITY GBR EXPOSURE
Natural BR vs GBR
4-RECEPIENTSITEMORBIDITY
RIDGE SPLIT PROCEDURES
Buccal plate fractureDelayed implants
3 mm
Anitua E, Alkhraisat MH. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Nov;74(11):2182-2191. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.182. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
Postoperative ridge
resorption
Bone graft
Expansion devices
5. WOUND CLOSURE, 6. BUCCAL FLAP
7. HEALING
De Stavola L, Tunkel J. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):921-6. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3370
"Obtained Primary Closure”
87.6% “Compromised closure”
44.6% of complications
Attributable to improper closure
5.WOUNDCLOSURE6.BUCCALFLAP7.HEALING
Amount of BUCCAL FLAP advancement required is based on
complexity of the surgical procedure*
*Greenstein G et al. Flap advancement: practical techniques to attain tension-free primary closure. J Periodontol. 2009
Jan;80(1):4-15.
Minor Flap
Advancement
(<3mm)
Moderate Flap
Advancement
(3 to 6 mm)
Major Flap
Advancement
( ≥7 mm)
5.WOUNDCLOSURE6.BUCCALFLAP7.HEALING
Major Flap Advancement
“EXTREME” REMOTE INCISIONS
Ashok Sethi, Thomas Kaus. Practical Implant Dentistry The Science and Art. Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd, UK.
5.WOUNDCLOSURE6.BUCCALFLAP7.HEALING
C
R
ER
5.WOUNDCLOSURE6.BUCCALFLAP7.HEALING
5.WOUNDCLOSURE6.BUCCALFLAP7.HEALING
5.WOUNDCLOSURE6.BUCCALFLAP7.HEALING
5.WOUNDCLOSURE6.BUCCALFLAP7.HEALING
5.WOUNDCLOSURE6.BUCCALFLAP7.HEALING
Wang HL, Boyapati L. "PASS" principles for predictable bone
regeneration. Implant Dent. 2006;15:8–17
8. IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT
FOR AGAINST
Immediate implant placement
might reduce ridge resorption
during the healing of the
alveolar socket
Barzilay, GN et al.
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants,
I. vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 277–284, 1991.
After 12 weeks, the buccal
crest is located >2mm
apical of the
implant margin
M Caneva, and D Botticelli
Clinical Oral Implants Research,
vol.21,no. 1, pp. 43–49, 2010.
8-IMMEDIATEIMPLANTPLACEMENT
OSTEOGENIC JUMPING DISTANCE
(Harris, 1983)/D. Botticelli, T. Berglundh, D. Buser, and J. Lindhe, “The jumping distance
revisited,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 35– 42, 2003
0.2 mm- Perfect osteon growth
0.5 mm- Osteon like
compartment
1 mm- Incomplete healing
Bone wont be able to cross
gaps wider than 1mm by
one single jump in 3-4 weeks
8-IMMEDIATEIMPLANTPLACEMENT
Compensating for osteogenic jumping distance
LARGER DIAMETER IMPLANT
BUCCAL POSITIONING
GRAFTING ON BUCCAL BONE
X Bone response?
X Loss of prosthetic centre
X More Bone loss
M. G. Araujo, F. Sukekava, J. L. Wennstrom, and J. Lindhe, Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 17, no. 6,
pp. 615–624, 2006.
8-IMMEDIATEIMPLANTPLACEMENT
Compensatingforosteogenicjumpingdistance
0.8 mm deeper
Slightly lingual
Bone Overbuilding
B. I. Simon et al. Journal of Periodontology,
vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 1774– 1791, 2000.
Soft tissue grafting
H.Tal. Clinical Oral Implants Research,
vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 289–296, 1999.
9. DELAYED IMPLANT PLACEMENT
Type 1: Implants in fresh extraction sockets
Type 2: Implants placed within 4–8 weeks
Type 3: Implants within 12–16 weeks in a socket
with partial bone healing
Type 4: implants placed in a fully healed
edentulous site (>6 month)
C. H. F. Hammerle, et al, “Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures
regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial
Implants, vol. 19, pp. 26–28, 2004.
9-DELAYEDIMPLANTPLACEMENT
N. P. Lang, L. Pun, K. Y. Lau, K. Y. Li, and M. C. Wong, “A systematic review on survival and success rates of
implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least
1 year,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 23, supplement 5, pp. 39–66, 2012.
10. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
*Dimitriou R et al. BMC Med. 2011 May 31;9:66.
Busenlechner et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Oct;20(10):1078-83
“All human beings err, but they err frequently
and in predictable, patterned ways.”
Atul Gawande
Complications: A Surgeon's Notes on an Imperfect Science
“Everything intelligent is so
boring”

More Related Content

PPTX
Ridge augmentation
PPTX
Hard Tissue Augmentation.pptx
PPTX
Vertical ridge augmentation
PPTX
Approaches to ridge augmentation
PPTX
Ridge augmentation - Dr. Kinjal ghelani
PPTX
Ridge Augmentation Procedures
PPTX
Ridge augmentation seminar
PPTX
Localized bone augmentation and implant site development
Ridge augmentation
Hard Tissue Augmentation.pptx
Vertical ridge augmentation
Approaches to ridge augmentation
Ridge augmentation - Dr. Kinjal ghelani
Ridge Augmentation Procedures
Ridge augmentation seminar
Localized bone augmentation and implant site development

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Ridge split in implantology
PPTX
Ridge Split Techniques.pptx
PPTX
Implant failure , complications and treatment, management- Partha Sarathi Adhya
PPTX
Immediate implants
PPTX
Implant dentistry in esthetic zone
PPTX
"Sinus Lift in Implant Dentistry"
PPTX
Implant complications
PPTX
Drilling sequence in implants
PPTX
Root coverage procedures. Dr. Kinjal ghelani
PPTX
Guided bone regeneration
PPTX
Landmark studies in periodontics isp webinar
PPTX
Soft tissue management around dental implant
PPTX
5. Vestibuloplasty.pptx
PPT
Modified Papilla Preservation Technique
PPTX
Bone grafts
PPTX
Mucosa- Implant Interface.pptx
PPTX
Soft tissue considerations for implant placement
PPTX
PLATFORM SWITCHING
PPTX
Immediate implant placement
Ridge split in implantology
Ridge Split Techniques.pptx
Implant failure , complications and treatment, management- Partha Sarathi Adhya
Immediate implants
Implant dentistry in esthetic zone
"Sinus Lift in Implant Dentistry"
Implant complications
Drilling sequence in implants
Root coverage procedures. Dr. Kinjal ghelani
Guided bone regeneration
Landmark studies in periodontics isp webinar
Soft tissue management around dental implant
5. Vestibuloplasty.pptx
Modified Papilla Preservation Technique
Bone grafts
Mucosa- Implant Interface.pptx
Soft tissue considerations for implant placement
PLATFORM SWITCHING
Immediate implant placement

Similar to Concepts of ridge augmentation (20)

PPTX
Horizintal ridge augmentations worth or vain
PDF
Classification of alveolar bone width
PPTX
The lost buccal plate
PPTX
Ridge Augmentation II.pptx
PPT
Socket Preservation _NIDM January 2011
PPTX
When not to use regenerative materials in periodontics
PPTX
Selection of bone grafts in periodontics
PDF
3 mucoderm puisys_eao2011 poster
PPTX
IMPLANT SITE PREPARATION.pptx
PPTX
SOCKET PRESERVATION TECHNIQUE- A Case Presentation.pptx
PDF
3rd publication JCDR-8th name.pdf
PPTX
PONTICS as a part of fixed partial denture
PPTX
It is of topic PONTICS in fixed partial deture.pptx
PPTX
Treatment of the edentulous patient
PDF
3RD PUBLICATION - JCDR - Dr. RAHUL VC TIWARI, SIBAR INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIE...
PPTX
Implant Site Preparation.pptx
PPTX
flat ridge management .pptx
PPTX
Socket shield
PPT
Immediate implant lecture
PPT
alveolar ridge expansion and socket preservation
Horizintal ridge augmentations worth or vain
Classification of alveolar bone width
The lost buccal plate
Ridge Augmentation II.pptx
Socket Preservation _NIDM January 2011
When not to use regenerative materials in periodontics
Selection of bone grafts in periodontics
3 mucoderm puisys_eao2011 poster
IMPLANT SITE PREPARATION.pptx
SOCKET PRESERVATION TECHNIQUE- A Case Presentation.pptx
3rd publication JCDR-8th name.pdf
PONTICS as a part of fixed partial denture
It is of topic PONTICS in fixed partial deture.pptx
Treatment of the edentulous patient
3RD PUBLICATION - JCDR - Dr. RAHUL VC TIWARI, SIBAR INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIE...
Implant Site Preparation.pptx
flat ridge management .pptx
Socket shield
Immediate implant lecture
alveolar ridge expansion and socket preservation

More from R Viswa Chandra (20)

PPTX
PeriImplantitis Concepts.pptx
PPTX
Is Flap Surgery Being Undermined in this Era of Implantology
PPTX
Periodontal Regeneration- The right way forward
PPTX
Periodontitis and Systemic Diseases- A Broken Two-way Mirror
PPTX
Tissue engineering
PPT
Hypoxia in periodontal disease
PPT
Osteogenic Potential of Bone Grafts
PPTX
Dysbiosis and Host in Periodontics
PPTX
Cytokines and Periodontal Disease
PPTX
Active and passive implants and Microgap around implants
PPTX
Complement system and periodontitis
PPTX
Periodontal pocket
PPTX
Controversies in periodontics
PPTX
Publish and submit
PPT
Dissertation dilemmas
PPTX
Preparing PRF
PPTX
Platelet concentrates
PPTX
Growth factors applications and limitations
PPTX
Sinus lift
PeriImplantitis Concepts.pptx
Is Flap Surgery Being Undermined in this Era of Implantology
Periodontal Regeneration- The right way forward
Periodontitis and Systemic Diseases- A Broken Two-way Mirror
Tissue engineering
Hypoxia in periodontal disease
Osteogenic Potential of Bone Grafts
Dysbiosis and Host in Periodontics
Cytokines and Periodontal Disease
Active and passive implants and Microgap around implants
Complement system and periodontitis
Periodontal pocket
Controversies in periodontics
Publish and submit
Dissertation dilemmas
Preparing PRF
Platelet concentrates
Growth factors applications and limitations
Sinus lift

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
PEDIATRIC OSCE, MBBS, by Dr. Sangit Chhantyal(IOM)..pptx
PPTX
SPIROMETRY and pulmonary function test basic
PPTX
3. Adherance Complianace.pptx pharmacy pci
PPTX
PE and Health 7 Quarter 3 Lesson 1 Day 3,4 and 5.pptx
PDF
MINERAL & VITAMIN CHARTS fggfdtujhfd.pdf
PPTX
DeployedMedicineMedical EquipmentTCCC.pptx
PDF
NURSING INFORMATICS AND NURSE ENTREPRENEURSHIP
PPTX
1. Drug Distribution System.pptt b pharmacy
PDF
chapter 14.pdf Ch+12+SGOB.docx hilighted important stuff on exa,
PPTX
community services team project 2(4).pptx
PPT
Parental-Carer-mental-illness-and-Potential-impact-on-Dependant-Children.ppt
PPTX
Trichuris trichiura infection
DOCX
ch 9 botes for OB aka Pregnant women eww
PDF
2E-Learning-Together...PICS-PCISF con.pdf
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 8
PPTX
unit1-introduction of nursing education..
PPTX
Immunity....(shweta).................pptx
PPTX
guidance--unit 1 semester-5 bsc nursing.
PPT
Pyramid Points Acid Base Power Point (10).ppt
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 1
PEDIATRIC OSCE, MBBS, by Dr. Sangit Chhantyal(IOM)..pptx
SPIROMETRY and pulmonary function test basic
3. Adherance Complianace.pptx pharmacy pci
PE and Health 7 Quarter 3 Lesson 1 Day 3,4 and 5.pptx
MINERAL & VITAMIN CHARTS fggfdtujhfd.pdf
DeployedMedicineMedical EquipmentTCCC.pptx
NURSING INFORMATICS AND NURSE ENTREPRENEURSHIP
1. Drug Distribution System.pptt b pharmacy
chapter 14.pdf Ch+12+SGOB.docx hilighted important stuff on exa,
community services team project 2(4).pptx
Parental-Carer-mental-illness-and-Potential-impact-on-Dependant-Children.ppt
Trichuris trichiura infection
ch 9 botes for OB aka Pregnant women eww
2E-Learning-Together...PICS-PCISF con.pdf
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 8
unit1-introduction of nursing education..
Immunity....(shweta).................pptx
guidance--unit 1 semester-5 bsc nursing.
Pyramid Points Acid Base Power Point (10).ppt
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 1

Concepts of ridge augmentation

Editor's Notes

  • #3: Mark M. Ravitch said this
  • #4: After the loss of teeth atrophy of the alveolar processes occurs in a vertical as well as a horizontal plane. The term atrophy is defined in the dictionary as “a wasting away; a diminution in the size of a cell, tissue, organ, or part”. This process is starting and continuous throughout life because of the lack of stimuli (disuse atrophy) seen on alveolar process of the jaws. A classification of the edentulous jaws has been developed based on a randomised cross-sectional study from a sample of 300 dried skulls. It was noted that whilst the shape of the basalar process of the mandible and maxilla remains relatively stable, changes in shape of the alveolar process is highly significant in both the vertical and horizontal axes. In general, the changes of shape of the alveolar process follows a predictable pattern.
  • #5: Different views of sites of a dry mandible. a. cross section through an empty alveolar socket of a mandibular canine tooth; the red line represents the expected bone contour that would be established had the tooth been removed; note that the buccal wall contains exclusively cortical bone. b. cross section through an empty alveolar socket of a mandibular premolar tooth; note that the buccal wall contains exclusively cortical bone in spite of its being relatively thick c. cross section through an empty alveolar socket of a mandibular canine tooth; the red line represents the expected bone contour that would be established had the tooth been removed; note that the buccal wall is extremely thin ("paper thin") and contains exclusively cortical bone d. cross section of an edentulous inter-radicular site a few months after tooth loss; there is less bone loss in this area compared with extraction socket sites. e. upper view of an empty socket of the lower second molar showing the cribriform alveolar bone proper f. clinical view of the anterior segment of an edentulous mandible 1 year after extraction; severe disuse atrophy is noted
  • #6: Healing of the extraction socket with and without socket grafting. When socket grafting is not adopted, major alveolar ridge resorptionoccurs.Inafirstphase,initiallythebloodclot,subsequentlythegranulationtissueandlatertheprovisionalmatrixandthewoven bone fill up the alveolus. The bundle bone is completely resorbed causing a reduction in the vertical ridge. In a second phase, the buccal wall and the woven bone are remodeled causing the horizontal and further vertical ridge reduction. When socket grafting is adopted, the first phase and vertical bone reduction still occur, however, the second phase and the horizontal contraction are reduced.
  • #8: Atwood evaluated the resorption process in the postextraction anterior ridge of the edentulous mandible in several clinical and cephalometric studies [11-13]. Atwood and Coy divided the factors affecting the rate of resorption into four categories: anatomic, metabolic, functional and prosthetic. Anatomic factors included the thickness of the mucosa covering the ridge, the ridge relationship, the depth of the socket, the number of sockets present, the size, shape, and density of the ridges. Metabolic factors influence the cellular activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts by way of nutritional, hormonal, and other metabolic facets. Functional factors involved the intensity, duration, frequency, and direction of forces applied to bone. These factors affected cellular activity, bone formation or resorption, depending upon a patient’s resistance to the forces. Primarily, prosthetic factors concerned the type of prostheses involved and the materials and principles used to obtain a restorative goal. All categories as described by A
  • #10: In 1983, Seibert classified alveolar crestal defects:[1] Class I: buccolingual loss of tissue with normal apicocoronal ridge height Class II: apicocoronal loss of tissue with normal buccolingual ridge width Class III: combination-type defects (loss of both height and width) Seibert in 19832 and later modified by Allen in 1985Allen further quantified the loss of ridge dimension into mild (<3 mm), moderate (3–6 mm) and severe (>6 mm).
  • #18: Part 1: Orientation of the defect H: horizontal V: vertical C: combined S (or +S): sinus area Part 2: Reconstruction needs associated with the defect 1: low: < 4 mm 2: medium: 4-8 mm 3: high: > 8 mm Part 3: Relation of augmentation and defect region i: internal, inside the contour e: external, outside the ridge contour
  • #38: L-PRF membranes are not comparable to resorbable collagen or non-resorbable ePTFE membranes, they belong to a completely different category of membrane [145]. However, the difference between GTR and NTR is not only the replacement of the various heterologous membranes used in GTR by a new kind of natural autologous membrane: it is also a true evolution of the concept behind. Indeed, L-PRF membranes are optimized blood clot, and therefore their interactions with the tissues do not follow strictly the core principles of GTR: GTR membranes had to stabilize the blood clot and to create a cell-proof barrier against soft tissue invagination, a NBR membrane is the blood clot itself (therefore rich in cells) and is only a bioactive competitive barrier. While other membranes are considered as foreign bodies by the host tissues and interfere with the natural tissue healing process, a L-PRF membrane is as natural as the host tissue: it is a blood clot prepared in an optimized form and that can be easily handled by a surgeon. mThe use of L-PRF membranes during the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects was called NTR and represented an alternative technique to GTR. Logically GBR can evolve into a new form of bone regeneration using L-PRF membranes, called Natural Bone Regeneration (NBR). NBR is based on the same principles than NTR described previously, the main difference being that NBR only targets to regenerate bone (and not the periodontal ligament and gingival attachment on the teeth), and consequently also to regenerate the gingival tissue covering this bone: in the NBR core concept, like in NTR, hard and soft tissues can not be considered separately.
  • #41: The survival rate of the 31 implants was 100% and the prosthesis success rate was 96.8%.
  • #44: If buccal vertical releasing incisions and periosteal fenestrations do not provide enough flap advancement to achieve tensionless primary closure, it is necessary to cut deeper into the sub mucosa. This is done only when necessary as the patient experiences increased morbidity with regard to swelling, hemorrhage, and discomfort.
  • #52: Chemical composition of bone consists of 65% mineral, mostly hydroxyapatite, 25% organic matrix (90% collagen, 10% proteoglycan and noncollagenous protein), and 10% water. Bone is formed by osteoblast. Bone formation starts with the deposition of osteoid, which subsequently mineralized. Woven bone formed at faster rate than lamellar bone. The mineralization of woven bone is initiated by matrix vessicle pinched off from the cytoplasmic process. It is able to form struts and bridges and its apposition rate depends on osteoblast recruitment. Woven bone grew at rapid rate and the interval between deposition and mineralization is only from 1 to 3 days. Lamellar bone grows about 1 to 2 micron per day. The interval between deposition and mineralization is 10 days. Mineralization of lamellar bone occurred with some basic criterias: an adequate concentration of calcium and phosphate ions, the presence of a calcifiable matrix and nucleating agens, and the control by regulators (promoters and inhibitors). Collagen is thought to have a major role in being a nucleator. Study of the repair of bony of bony defects of various diameters have shown that when the diameter of the bony defect is .2mm in diameter or less, we will have a new perfect osteon growth. When the defect is approaching .5mm in diameter, osteon like compartment resulted from branching vessel will form. When the defect is 1.0mm or more in diameter, blood vessel could not traverse the area and thus the result is the incomplete healing of the defect. The distance of which the blood vessel can branching and allow complete healing of the defect is called the osteogenic jumping distance (Harris 1983). It indicates that bone is not able to cross gaps wider than 1mm by one single jump. Thus in the case of the defect which is greater than 1.0mm in diameter, we have exceeds the osteogenic jumping distance. The osteogenic jumping distance is species specific (Rat has high osteogenic jumping distance and therefore experiment with rat should allowed for creation of greater defect). The distance of which the blood vessel can branch and allow complete bridging by woven bone healing of a defect is called the “osteogenic jumping distance” 46. The osteogenic jumping distance is around 1 mm for rabbit cortical bone and is species specific. Larger gaps or holes will take longer time to complete repair. Bone filling of larger defects is facilitated by osteoconduction, ie, by offering a framework or scaffold for bone deposition. There are certain conditions that will influence the osteoconduction: 1) Biocompatibility of the scaffold and 2) The external and internal structure of the scaffold should favor tissue ingrowth and bone deposition
  • #59: Leo Tolstoy, Anna Karenina