ME 138: Formula SAE ChassisFinal DesignJed EscovillaJoe FiniBen LyJesse ThompsonGustavo Ortiz
Goals and Ideas 2010 ChassisTorsional Rigidity:	370 lb-ft / degreeThe Use of FEA
F-SAE 2010 Chassis: WeightWeight: 		Under 63 lbsThe Lighter 		The Faster
F-SAE 2010 Chassis: ComfortDrivers Seating Angle & Front Hoop:	Increase Comfort and Ease Driver Egress
Concurrent Engineering Principles UsedDesign for ManufacturingDesign for CostDesign for Serviceability
Design for ManufacturingRedesigned frame has reduced amount of welded joints Reduced the number of tubing for the frame
Redesign of Front Hoop2009 front hoop had too many butt welded joints, these are replaced with bends.
Reduction in Frame TubingRemoved tubing from engine mounting structure
Design for CostsManufacturing Costs were reduced by :Replace welds with bending when possibleReducing number of tubes for frameMaterial CostsSteel used for frame increased but only by a small amount to make up for loss rigidity.
Design for ServiceabilityMain hoop bracing redesign for engine serviceability.
FEA Analysis and testing
Torsional RigidityWithout proper rigidity significant frame bending occurs (strain)With major flexing in the frame, clearances will be affectedFrame flex induces forces not originally intended
Torsional Rigidity testingFt-lbsUnits:degree
2010 Frame Rigidity
Race Conditions SimulationApplying loads during race conditions Most extreme case: Turning
FSAE Autocross ConditionsD7.2 Autocross Course Specifications & SpeedsD7.2.1 The following standard specifications will suggest the maximum speeds that will be encountered onthe course. Average speeds should be 40 km/hr (25 mph) to 48 km/hr (30 mph).Straights: No longer than 60 m (200 feet) with hairpins at both ends (or) no longer than 45 m(150 feet) with wide turns on the ends.Constant Turns: 23 m (75 feet) to 45 m (148 feet) diameter.Hairpin Turns: Minimum of 9 m (29.5 feet) outside diameter (of the turn).Slaloms: Cones in a straight line with 7.62 m (25 feet) to 12.19 m (40 feet) spacing.Miscellaneous: Chicanes, multiple turns, decreasing radius turns, etc. The minimum track width will be 3.5 m (11.5 feet).F=20.5slugs*44ft/s^2/29.5ft = 1,331 Pounds of Force OR (66ft/s^2)/(32.2ft/s^2)=2 *Gs
COST
FSAE Cost GuidelinesCost Event – The Cost Event Rules (abbreviated)1. Standardized Prices – The prices for parts, materials and processes have been standardized and the prices in the official Cost Tables must be used. If you use a part or process that’s not in the table there is a procedure for having it added. The standardized Cost Tables will be published through the FSAE website.2. No Receipts – Since prices are standardized no receipts are required – except when requesting items be added to the table.3. No Maximum Cost – You can spend as much as you like on your FSAE car with the understanding that your total cost is a significant factor in your Cost Event score.
2010 CostCost estimate for frame design consisting of 57 tubes and 114 tube ends
Material Costs:- frame weight = 63.25 lbm - standardized cost = $4.95/lbm - material cost = $313.09
2010 CostManufacturingStandardized Costs:Tube prep = $0.75/endTube cut = $1.20/endTube weld = $1.20/endTube bend = $0.75/bend
2010 CostManufacturing Costs - 114 welds = $136.80- 8 bends = $6.00- 114 tube preps = $85.50- 114 tube cuts = $136.80- Total = $365.10
2010 CostMaterials Cost = $313.09Manufacturing Cost = $365.10Total = $678.19
Old VS NewCost ReductionsShorter Chassis
Less Manufacturing Costs

More Related Content

PDF
Seated back-extension
DOCX
Design procedure for dts (revised)
PDF
Dolium - warehouse & transport stacking
PDF
Design procedure for Cast iron pulley, Flat belt drive, V belt drive, Chain d...
PDF
DTS procedure
PPTX
2.flat belts & sample problem
PPTX
HSA_FINALPRESENTATION
PPT
Senior Design Project Final Presentation
Seated back-extension
Design procedure for dts (revised)
Dolium - warehouse & transport stacking
Design procedure for Cast iron pulley, Flat belt drive, V belt drive, Chain d...
DTS procedure
2.flat belts & sample problem
HSA_FINALPRESENTATION
Senior Design Project Final Presentation

What's hot (7)

PPTX
Final Presentation
PPTX
ASME HPVC 2017, LNMIIT jaipur, ACETII-II , Aloha college of Eng. & Tech.
PDF
Final Presentation - Senior Design Project
PPTX
Virtual baja 2016 17355 alpha college of engg. and tech._presentation.ppt
PDF
CIT SAEINDIA BAJA 2018 REPORT
PDF
Pedal reciprocating piston_pump[1]
PPTX
GOKART PROJECT
Final Presentation
ASME HPVC 2017, LNMIIT jaipur, ACETII-II , Aloha college of Eng. & Tech.
Final Presentation - Senior Design Project
Virtual baja 2016 17355 alpha college of engg. and tech._presentation.ppt
CIT SAEINDIA BAJA 2018 REPORT
Pedal reciprocating piston_pump[1]
GOKART PROJECT
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPT
Concurrent Engineering
PPTX
Concurrent engineering
PPT
Concurrent engineering
PPT
Concurrent Engineering
PPTX
Concurrent engineering TOYOTA
PPTX
Benefits of Concurrent Engineering
PPTX
AIRBUS-CONCURRENT ENGINEERING, by Jeevan B M
PPTX
Concurrent engineering
PPTX
Concurrent engineering
PPTX
Fms seminar
PDF
Application of Composite Materials for different mechanical components
PPTX
Composite materials
PDF
Airbus Presentation - How They Improved Delivery Speed and Quality
PDF
Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA)
PPT
Composite materials
PDF
Fmea presentation
PDF
Concurrent Disorders Case Study
PPTX
Ford figo c1presentation
PDF
Can we efficiently verify concurrent programs under relaxed memory models in ...
Concurrent Engineering
Concurrent engineering
Concurrent engineering
Concurrent Engineering
Concurrent engineering TOYOTA
Benefits of Concurrent Engineering
AIRBUS-CONCURRENT ENGINEERING, by Jeevan B M
Concurrent engineering
Concurrent engineering
Fms seminar
Application of Composite Materials for different mechanical components
Composite materials
Airbus Presentation - How They Improved Delivery Speed and Quality
Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Composite materials
Fmea presentation
Concurrent Disorders Case Study
Ford figo c1presentation
Can we efficiently verify concurrent programs under relaxed memory models in ...
Ad

Similar to Concurrent Engineering (20)

PPTX
BM Chassis PDR Revision_Jan30 (in progress2)
PPTX
Va.ve approach
PPTX
SpinArc® Welding Process Technology - Overview
PDF
Team Kashpiers "Baja 2013"
PPTX
Zero Turn Radius Presentation - Team Panache
PPTX
Grabis_Michael_Presentation
PDF
Design of a Gear Reducer for a Tractor
PPTX
SpinArc® Productivity Case Studies
DOCX
PDF
MULTI CAVITY DIE PREPARATION, ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESS OF DIESEL EN...
PPT
Peb 1234330943765774 1
PDF
Jack hammer
PDF
2005 polaris 700 xc sp m 10 snowmobile service repair manual
PDF
2005 polaris 600 xc sp snowmobile service repair manual
PDF
2005 polaris 500 xc sp m 10 snowmobile service repair manual
PDF
2005 polaris 700 xc sp edge snowmobile service repair manual
PPTX
description description ETM551Lecture04.pptxpresentation
PPT
Cem 350 hvac distribution systems sizing 10 2016
PDF
Design of half shaft and wheel hub assembly for racing car
BM Chassis PDR Revision_Jan30 (in progress2)
Va.ve approach
SpinArc® Welding Process Technology - Overview
Team Kashpiers "Baja 2013"
Zero Turn Radius Presentation - Team Panache
Grabis_Michael_Presentation
Design of a Gear Reducer for a Tractor
SpinArc® Productivity Case Studies
MULTI CAVITY DIE PREPARATION, ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESS OF DIESEL EN...
Peb 1234330943765774 1
Jack hammer
2005 polaris 700 xc sp m 10 snowmobile service repair manual
2005 polaris 600 xc sp snowmobile service repair manual
2005 polaris 500 xc sp m 10 snowmobile service repair manual
2005 polaris 700 xc sp edge snowmobile service repair manual
description description ETM551Lecture04.pptxpresentation
Cem 350 hvac distribution systems sizing 10 2016
Design of half shaft and wheel hub assembly for racing car

Concurrent Engineering

  • 1. ME 138: Formula SAE ChassisFinal DesignJed EscovillaJoe FiniBen LyJesse ThompsonGustavo Ortiz
  • 2. Goals and Ideas 2010 ChassisTorsional Rigidity: 370 lb-ft / degreeThe Use of FEA
  • 3. F-SAE 2010 Chassis: WeightWeight: Under 63 lbsThe Lighter The Faster
  • 4. F-SAE 2010 Chassis: ComfortDrivers Seating Angle & Front Hoop: Increase Comfort and Ease Driver Egress
  • 5. Concurrent Engineering Principles UsedDesign for ManufacturingDesign for CostDesign for Serviceability
  • 6. Design for ManufacturingRedesigned frame has reduced amount of welded joints Reduced the number of tubing for the frame
  • 7. Redesign of Front Hoop2009 front hoop had too many butt welded joints, these are replaced with bends.
  • 8. Reduction in Frame TubingRemoved tubing from engine mounting structure
  • 9. Design for CostsManufacturing Costs were reduced by :Replace welds with bending when possibleReducing number of tubes for frameMaterial CostsSteel used for frame increased but only by a small amount to make up for loss rigidity.
  • 10. Design for ServiceabilityMain hoop bracing redesign for engine serviceability.
  • 12. Torsional RigidityWithout proper rigidity significant frame bending occurs (strain)With major flexing in the frame, clearances will be affectedFrame flex induces forces not originally intended
  • 15. Race Conditions SimulationApplying loads during race conditions Most extreme case: Turning
  • 16. FSAE Autocross ConditionsD7.2 Autocross Course Specifications & SpeedsD7.2.1 The following standard specifications will suggest the maximum speeds that will be encountered onthe course. Average speeds should be 40 km/hr (25 mph) to 48 km/hr (30 mph).Straights: No longer than 60 m (200 feet) with hairpins at both ends (or) no longer than 45 m(150 feet) with wide turns on the ends.Constant Turns: 23 m (75 feet) to 45 m (148 feet) diameter.Hairpin Turns: Minimum of 9 m (29.5 feet) outside diameter (of the turn).Slaloms: Cones in a straight line with 7.62 m (25 feet) to 12.19 m (40 feet) spacing.Miscellaneous: Chicanes, multiple turns, decreasing radius turns, etc. The minimum track width will be 3.5 m (11.5 feet).F=20.5slugs*44ft/s^2/29.5ft = 1,331 Pounds of Force OR (66ft/s^2)/(32.2ft/s^2)=2 *Gs
  • 17. COST
  • 18. FSAE Cost GuidelinesCost Event – The Cost Event Rules (abbreviated)1. Standardized Prices – The prices for parts, materials and processes have been standardized and the prices in the official Cost Tables must be used. If you use a part or process that’s not in the table there is a procedure for having it added. The standardized Cost Tables will be published through the FSAE website.2. No Receipts – Since prices are standardized no receipts are required – except when requesting items be added to the table.3. No Maximum Cost – You can spend as much as you like on your FSAE car with the understanding that your total cost is a significant factor in your Cost Event score.
  • 19. 2010 CostCost estimate for frame design consisting of 57 tubes and 114 tube ends
  • 20. Material Costs:- frame weight = 63.25 lbm - standardized cost = $4.95/lbm - material cost = $313.09
  • 21. 2010 CostManufacturingStandardized Costs:Tube prep = $0.75/endTube cut = $1.20/endTube weld = $1.20/endTube bend = $0.75/bend
  • 22. 2010 CostManufacturing Costs - 114 welds = $136.80- 8 bends = $6.00- 114 tube preps = $85.50- 114 tube cuts = $136.80- Total = $365.10
  • 23. 2010 CostMaterials Cost = $313.09Manufacturing Cost = $365.10Total = $678.19
  • 24. Old VS NewCost ReductionsShorter Chassis
  • 27. Reduces the number of tube ends to be notched and welded
  • 28. Bending is cheaper than cutting, prepping, and welding ends2009 ChassisItem Qty Cost Tube Cuts 130 $ 156.00Tube Prep 130 97.50Tube Welds 130 156.00Bends 4 3.00Material Costs 306.90Total Cost 719.402010 ChassisItem Qty Cost Tube Cuts 114 $ 136.80Tube Prep 114 85.50Tube Welds 114 136.80Bends 8 6.00Material Costs 313.08Total Cost 678.19