Constraints in Discourse 172nd Edition Anton Benz (Ed.)
Constraints in Discourse 172nd Edition Anton Benz (Ed.)
Constraints in Discourse 172nd Edition Anton Benz (Ed.)
Constraints in Discourse 172nd Edition Anton Benz (Ed.)
1. Download the full version and explore a variety of ebooks
or textbooks at https://ebookultra.com
Constraints in Discourse 172nd Edition Anton Benz
(Ed.)
_____ Tap the link below to start your download _____
https://ebookultra.com/download/constraints-in-
discourse-172nd-edition-anton-benz-ed/
Find ebooks or textbooks at ebookultra.com today!
2. We believe these products will be a great fit for you. Click
the link to download now, or visit ebookultra.com
to discover even more!
Wilhelm Reich in Hell Robert Anton Wilson
https://ebookultra.com/download/wilhelm-reich-in-hell-robert-anton-
wilson/
Conversion to Islam in the Balkans Anton Minkov
https://ebookultra.com/download/conversion-to-islam-in-the-balkans-
anton-minkov/
Uncle Vanya Anton Chekhov
https://ebookultra.com/download/uncle-vanya-anton-chekhov/
Advances in Insect Physiology Vol 29 1st Edition Peter
Evans
https://ebookultra.com/download/advances-in-insect-physiology-
vol-29-1st-edition-peter-evans/
3. Calculus 10th Edition Howard Anton
https://ebookultra.com/download/calculus-10th-edition-howard-anton/
Lenin as Philosopher Anton Pannekoek
https://ebookultra.com/download/lenin-as-philosopher-anton-pannekoek/
Immunogenetics 1st Edition Anton W. Langerak
https://ebookultra.com/download/immunogenetics-1st-edition-anton-w-
langerak/
Anton Chekhov 1st Edition Rose Whyman
https://ebookultra.com/download/anton-chekhov-1st-edition-rose-whyman/
Adobe InDesign Classroom in a Book 2022 release 1st
Edition Kelly Anton
https://ebookultra.com/download/adobe-indesign-classroom-in-a-
book-2022-release-1st-edition-kelly-anton/
5. Constraints in Discourse 172nd Edition Anton Benz (Ed.)
Digital Instant Download
Author(s): Anton Benz (ed.), Peter Kühnlein (ed.)
ISBN(s): 9789027291431, 9027291438
Edition: 172
File Details: PDF, 4.06 MB
Year: 2008
Language: english
8. Volume 172
Constraints in Discourse
Edited by Anton Benz and Peter Kühnlein
Editor
Andreas H. Jucker
University of Zurich, English Department
Plattenstrasse 47, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
e-mail: ahjucker@es.uzh.ch
Editorial Board
Shoshana Blum-Kulka
Hebrew University of
Jerusalem
Jean Caron
Université de Poitiers
Robyn Carston
University College London
Bruce Fraser
Boston University
Thorstein Fretheim
University of Trondheim
John C. Heritage
University of California at Los
Angeles
Susan C. Herring
Indiana University
Masako K. Hiraga
St.Paul’s (Rikkyo) University
David Holdcroft
University of Leeds
Sachiko Ide
Japan Women’s University
Catherine Kerbrat-
Orecchioni
University of Lyon 2
Claudia de Lemos
University of Campinas, Brazil
Marina Sbisà
University of Trieste
Associate Editors
Jacob L. Mey
University of Southern
Denmark
Herman Parret
Belgian National Science
Foundation, Universities of
Louvain and Antwerp
Jef Verschueren
Belgian National Science
Foundation,
University of Antwerp
Emanuel A. Schegloff
University of California at Los
Angeles
Deborah Schiffrin
Georgetown University
Paul Osamu Takahara
Kobe City University of
Foreign Studies
Sandra A. Thompson
University of California at
Santa Barbara
Teun A. van Dijk
Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona
Richard J.Watts
University of Berne
Pragmatics & Beyond New Series is a continuation of Pragmatics & Beyond and
its Companion Series. The New Series offers a selection of high quality work
covering the full richness of Pragmatics as an interdisciplinary field, within
language sciences.
Pragmatics & Beyond New Series (P&BNS)
9. Constraints in Discourse
Edited by
Anton Benz
Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaften
Peter Kühnlein
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Amsterdam/Philadelphia
11. Table of contents
Acknowledgements vii
1. Constraints in discourse: An Introduction 1
part i
The Right Frontier 27
2. Troubles on the right frontier 29
Nicholas Asher
3. The moving right frontier 53
Laurent Prévot and Laure Vieu
part ii
Comparing Frameworks 67
4. Strong generative capacity of rst, sdrt and discourse dependency dags 69
Laurence Danlos
5. Rhetorical distance revisited: A parameterized approach 97
Christian Chiarcos and Olga Krasavina
6. Underspecified discourse representation 117
Markus Egg and Gisela Redeker
part iii
The Cognitive Perspective 139
7.
Dependency precedes independence: Online evidence from discourse
processing 141
Petra Burkhardt
8.
Accessing discourse referents introduced in negated phrases: Evidence for
accommodation? 159
Barbara Kaup and Jana Lüdtke
12. Table of contents
part iv
Language Specific Phenomena 179
9. Complex anaphors in discourse 181
Manfred Consten and Mareile Knees
10. The discourse functions of the present perfect 201
Atsuko Nishiyama and Jean-Pierre Koenig
11. German right dislocation and afterthought in discourse 225
Maria Averintseva-Klisch
12. A discourse-relational approach to continuation 249
Anke Holler
13. German Vorfeld-filling as constraint interaction 267
Augustin Speyer
Index 291
13. Acknowledgements
The contributions collected in this volume are based on the proceedings of the first
conference on Constraints in Discourse held at the University of Dortmund. All con-
tributions have been reviewed again and thoroughly revised before publication. The
conference was organised by the two editors Anton Benz and Peter Kühnlein together
with Claudia Sassen. Both editors regret that Claudia Sassen, who did a great job at
organising the conference, had to leave the editorial board.
We thank Angelika Storrer from the Institute for German Language at the Univer-
sity of Dortmund as well as the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for their financial
support. Furthermore, we have to thank our employers, the IFKI at the University of
Southern Denmark, the University of Bielefeld, the ZAS in Berlin and the University
of Groningen for their help and encouragement.
John Tammena has helped reduce the unreadability of our introductory chapter.
We want to thank him as well as Paul David Doherty who helped setting up the index.
Our special thanks, however, go to Andreas Jucker, the series editor of PBns, and
of course to Isja Conen from John Benjamins’ publishing company, for their untiring
help and patience.
15. Constraints in discourse
An introduction
1. General remarks
For a long time the development of precise frameworks of discourse interpretation has
been hampered by the lack of a deeper understanding of the dependencies between
different discourse units. The last 20 years have seen a considerable advance in this
field. A number of strong constraints have been proposed that restrict the sequencing
and attaching of segments at various descriptive levels, as well as the interpretation of
their interrelations. An early and very influential work on the sequencing and acces-
sibility of expressions across sentence boundaries was concerned with the rfc (Right
Frontier Constraint), often associated with a paper by Polanyi (1988). The rfc formu-
lates a restriction on the possible discourse positions of pronominal expressions. Another
much discussed constraint governing pronominal reference is the centering principle
formulated by Grosz and Sidner (1986). In addition to the proposal of new discourse
constraints, recent years saw the development of competing formal frameworks for
discourse generation and interpretation, most importantly, Rhetorical Structure Theo-
ry (rst, Mann and Thompson 1987) and Segmented Discourse Representation Theory
(sdrt). Especially the recent publication of Asher and Lascarides (2003), which sum-
marises more than ten years of joint research in sdrt, gave a strong impulse to the field
of discourse semantics and led to the publication of an increasing number of papers.
Constraints play a role not only in diverse fields of linguistics, but in a wide variety
of fields of research in general, such as computer science, especially artificial intelli-
gence (cf., e.g., (Blache 2000)). What the use of constraints has in common in all these
fields is that they describe properties of objects in order to specify whether certain
objects are well-formed from the point of view of the background theory. As soon as
an object carries the property or properties specified by all of the constraints defined
by the theory, it counts as well-formed and is accepted as (part of) a model of the
theory. The object is then said to satisfy the constraints set by the theory.
Inthepresentcollection,anumberofauthorscontributedtodefineconstraintsthus
understood to specify properties that are relevant in the context of research on dis-
course. The multiplicity of identified constraints mirrors the multiple facets of this re-
search area itself. To give a rough understanding of major issues in discourse research,
we will lay out three paradigms in this introduction and relate them to each other and
to the texts in this volume.
The three paradigms we selected share a focus on rhetorical relations: a discourse
is conceived as such only if every part of it is connected to the rest via certain relations
16. Constraints in discourse — an introduction
that specify its role. This property of discourse is classically related to coherence and
cohesion and can be used as a constraint to distinguish well-formed discourses from
arbitrary sets of objects.
The paradigms were developed during the last 20 years and within their frame-
works, a number of such constraints have been proposed for the description and
explanation of the multiplicity of dependencies between units of discourse. Segmented
Discourse Representation Theory (sdrt), for example, posits a selection principle over
interpretations of discourse: among possible interpretations of a discourse the one is
selected that renders the discourse as coherent as possible. This is operationalised via
the number of rhethorical relations that connect parts of the discourse and an order-
ing over preferences for those relations: the more the better, given their type for some
discourse. This principle is called Maximise Discourse Coherence (mdc) and of course
is a constraint over the selection of interpretations as well as discourses: of those
interpretations that can be generated for a given discourse only those are acceptable
that have the highest possible degree of coherence. And among objects generally only
those count as discourse for which some interpretation establishes coherence. Con-
sider what would happen if (1b) and (1c) were exchanged in example (1), taken from
(Asher and Lascarides 2003); the resulting discourse would clearly be less acceptable,
and one might well argue that this would be due to the loss of coherence.
(1) a. One plaintiff was passed over for promotion three times.
b. Another didn’t get a raise for five years.
c.
A third plaintiff was given a lower wage compared to males who were
doing the same work.
d. But the jury didn’t believe this.
One prominent constraint that is recognised by almost all theories of discourse is the
so-called Right Frontier Constraint (rfc), see especially the chapters in Part I of this
book. This constraint amounts to a restriction over attachment points in a discourse.
(We will give a short characterization here and discuss the rfc a little more extensively
in Section 3.) Consider Example (1) again. Under any reasonable interpretation, (1d)
can only be related to either the immediately preceding utterance (1c) or to the totality
of the preceding utterances (1a–1c). In the first case, what the jury didn’t believe was
just the fact that one plaintiff was given a lower wage compared to males who were
doing the same work. In the second case, the jury wouldn’t believe any of the reported
facts. What should not be possible—and that is the claim connected with the rfc—is
an attachment of (1d) to (1a) or (1b) alone. These two utterances should be blocked as
attachment points.
The name Right Frontier Constraint derives from an assumption over representa-
tions stating that more recent utterances, or, more general, constituents in a discourse
are graphically represented to the right of less recent ones. Discussion of formal repre-
sentations of discourse structure and measures of anaphoric distances can be found in
the chapters of Part II of this book. The most recent constituents in discourse (1) prior
17. Constraints in discourse — an introduction
to the utterance of (1d) are either (1c) or the compound constituent (1a–1c), which
makes these two being situated on the right hand side of the representation given
this assumption. As accordingly all and only those constituents that are accessible for
pronominal anaphoric attachment are on the right hand side of the representation,
this constraint is called rfc.
As a reaction to the variety of constraints, there will be discussions on a broad
spectrum of restrictions on well-formedness, be these universal, language indepen-
dent restrictions, like the two mentioned seem to be, or language specific constraints.
It is one interesting property of constraints that they can be more or less specific, and
their effects can add to each other. Thus, one can end up with a very strong filter over
admissible structures by combining constraints that pertain to different properties of
objects. Exemplarily, there are discussions on language-specific constraints that don’t
seem to be readily transferable to other languages from, e.g., German. For more on
language specific constraints, see the chapters in Part IV of this book.
Other chapters, Part III, deal with psycholinguistic or neurolinguistic reflexes of
constraints and their empirical testing. During the processing of discourses by human
participants, the linguistic constraints can be expected to produce effects and generate
preferences for strategies or solutions. These predictions of course should be empiri-
cally testable.
2. The cognitive status of rhetorical relations
The theory of rhetorical relations is a cornerstone of discourse analysis. In general, it
is undisputed that the meaning of text is more than the conjunction of the meanings
of its sentences, but there are different opinions about the cognitive status of rhetori-
cal relations. One position assumes that rhetorical relations are part of the linguistic
inventory of language users and therefore of their linguistic competence. When faced
with a sequence of two text segments, the hearer or reader searches a closed list of
Figure 1. A graphical representation of what it means for a node to be on the right frontier:
node α represents the last utterance in a discourse. α and every node dominating α (like β) is
thus on the right frontier and available for attachment for a subsequent utterance γ.
α
β
γ
18. Constraints in discourse — an introduction
rhetorical relations and chooses that relation which fits best, where the criterion for
fitting best varies from theory to theory. From this we may distinguish positions that
assume that the extra information that the reader infers from the concatenation of two
text segments is derived e.g., from assumptions about the speaker’s intentions, com-
monsense world knowledge, and conversational maxims alone. Rhetorical relations
are then not part of our basic linguistic inventory. We may call the first position a
non–reductionist position and the second position a reductionist position. Within re-
ductionist positions we may roughly distinguish between approaches that take their
starting point in plan-based reasoning, and approaches that take their starting point in
Gricean pragmatics. The most important frameworks of discourse analysis discussed
in this volume are non–reductionist in character, e.g., the Linguistic Discourse Model
(Polanyi 1986), Rhetorical Structure Theory (Mann and Thompson 1987), and Seg-
mented Discourse Representation Theory (Asher and Lascarides 2003). As an illustra-
tion, we discuss the following example:
(2) Ann calls a taxi service.
Ann: (1) I need a taxi now. (2) Pick me up at the Dortmund railway station and
(3) drop me at Haus Bommerholz.
The first sentence is a directive speech act asking the taxi service to supply a transpor-
tation to Ann. Propositions (2) and (3) provide more information about the lift. They
elaborate the content of the first sentence. A non–reductionist would assume that there
exists a rhetorical relation Elaboration that is inferred by the addressee. The inference
of text coherence begins with an interpretation of the sentences (1), (2) and (3). The
addressee then searches a mental library of rhetorical relations. We may assume that
it contains the entries Elaboration, Explanation, and Result. Each rhetorical relation
defines constraints that must be fulfilled by text segments which are connected by the
relation. For example, a text segment β can only elaborate a text segment α if β denotes
a sub-eventuality of α, whereas Explanation and Result assume that the eventualities
are non-overlapping and that one is the result of the other. Hence, the addressee can
infer Elaboration, and therefore text coherence, from the fact that the propositions in
(2) and (3) refer to sub-eventualities of the event mentioned in (1). (For more on this
cf. Section 6.)
A reductionist tries to show discourse coherence without reference to a predefined
set of rhetorical relations. Instead, the explanation may for example rest on assumptions
about the speaker’s domain plans. Taking a lift with a taxi is an activity which can be bro-
ken down into being picked up by the taxi at a certain place, the taxi ride, and being dropped
at the destination. Schematically, we can describe this decomposition as follows:
→
1
(S ) TakingTaxi(P) PickUp(P, Time1, Place1), TaxiRide, Drop(P, Time2, Place2)
An analysis of Example (2) may proceed as follows: Sentence (1) states the speak-
er’s domain intention. This activates schema (S1), which is shared knowledge in the
19. Constraints in discourse — an introduction
relevant language community. In order to make the directive in (1) felicitous, some of
the parameters in (S1) have to be specified. This is done in sentences (2) and (3); they
state the place of departure Place1 and the destination Place2. Coherence is achieved
by direct reference to a schema like (S1). Discourse becomes incoherent if the hearer
cannot find a domain schema which connects the text segments, as seen in the follow-
ing example:
(3) Ann calls a taxi service.
Ann: (1) I need a taxi now. (2) I grew up in Bielefeld, Ostwestfahlen–Lippe.
A reductionist position which is based on plan recognition is widespread among
approaches in artificial intelligence, e.g., (Grosz and Sidner 1986; Litman and Allen
1990).
The assumption that rhetorical relations are part of our linguistic inventory has
consequences for our understanding of both pragmatics and, especially, conversation-
al implicatures (Grice, 1975). For an example we look at:1
(4) Ann: Smith doesn’t seem to have a girl friend.
Bob: He’s been paying lots of visits to New York lately.
Implicature: Smith possibly has a girl friend in New York (p).
In order to understand Bob’s utterance as a contribution to the ongoing conversation,
Ann has to find a rhetorical relation that connects his utterance to her contribution.
We may assume that there exists a rhetorical relation of Counterevidence. The infer-
ence of Counterevidence can proceed from the semantic content of the utterances and
their prosodic and other linguistic properties. It is not necessary that the inference
takes into account the interlocutors’ intentions.
If Counterevidence holds between Ann’s and Bob’s utterances, then Bob’s utterance
must provide evidence for the negation of Ann’s claim, i.e., it must provide evidence
for the claim that Smith has a girl friend. This is the case if one assumes that Smith
possibly has a girl friend in New York. Hence, the construction of a rhetorical relation
between the two utterances leads to an accommodation of the implicature (p).
We may contrast this reasoning with the standard theory of conversational impli-
catures (Grice 1975), (Levinson 1983, Ch. 3), which assumes that the implicatures are
derived by reasoning about each other’s intentions. According to Grice, interlocutors
adhere to a number of conversational principles which spell out how discourse par-
ticipants should behave in order to make their language use rational and efficient. In
particular, Grice assumes that each contribution to the ongoing conversation serves a
joint goal of speaker and hearer. A possible derivation of the implicature may proceed
1. For a more thorough discussion of this example and the relation between Grice’ theory
of conversational implicatures and the assumption of rhetorical relations see (Asher and
Lascarides 2003, Sec. 2.6).
20. Constraints in discourse — an introduction
as follows: (1) Ann’s utterance raises the question whether Smith has a girl friend; (2)
Bob’s contribution must be relevant to this question; (3) Bob’s contribution can only be
relevant if Smith possibly has a girl friend in New York; (4) as Bob has done nothing
in order to stop Ann from inferring that (p), it follows that she safely can infer that (p).
In contrast to the first explanation, this explanation infers implicatures directly from
joint intentions and a general principle of relevance.2
3. Topics in the analysis of discourse constraints
In the previous section, we were introduced to different positions concerning the status
of rhetorical relations. Rhetorical relations provide the backbone of some of the most
important formal frameworks in discourse analysis. In this section, we want to address
some topics in discourse analysis which are related to the investigation of discourse
constraints. We start with constraints related to rhetorical relations and the discourse
structures constructed by them. In this context, we introduce, for example, the Right
Frontier Constraint as first codified by Livia Polanyi (1986) in her ldm (for more detail
see Section 4).
Text coherence is the result of interconnectedness of text segments. The analysis
using rhetorical relations naturally leads to a representation as a graph. The terminal
nodes of the graph can be identified with elementary illocutionary acts. The graph in
Figure 2 shows an analysis of the following example, in which Ann tells how she came
to Haus Bommerholz:
(5)
Ann: (1) I arrived at 10 am. (2) I took a taxi then. (3) It picked me up at the
Dortmund railway station and (4) dropped me at Haus Bommerholz. (5)
I thought it might be quite complicated to get to this place but (6) it wasn’t.
A natural question that arises concerns the general structure of these graphs. First
we may ask, what kind of branches are associated with the different rhetorical rela-
tions. Are they always of the same kind or can we distinguish between different types
of relations? Closely related to this question is that for the types of graphs that can be
generated. For example, the graph in Figure 2 has a tree like structure and only binary
branches. A third question concerns the comparability of different representations.
The tree in Figure 2 is an rst graph (Mann and Thompson 1987). These trees are dif-
ferent from trees which we usually find in syntax. In syntactic trees, the relations that
connect two constituents are normally attached to the branching nodes. In rst graphs
2. Asher and Lascarides (2003) point out that any existing theory of conversational implica-
tures in the tradition of Grice, has to assume that interlocutors carry out costly computations
about each other’s intentions. Hence, a theory of conversational implicatures which is based on
the theory of rhetorical relations is attractive from a cognitive point of view as it makes weaker
assumptions about the inference capabilities of the interlocutors.
25. The Project Gutenberg eBook of Consolation in
Life and Death, Derived from the Life of Christ
26. This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.
Title: Consolation in Life and Death, Derived from the Life of
Christ
Author: J. Church
Release date: October 6, 2018 [eBook #58048]
Language: English
Credits: Transcribed from the 1824 R. Weston edition by David
Price
*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK CONSOLATION IN
LIFE AND DEATH, DERIVED FROM THE LIFE OF CHRIST ***
27. Transcribed from the 1824 R. Weston edition by David Price, email
ccx074@pglaf.org
28. CONSOLATION
IN
LIFE AND DEATH,
DERIVED FROM THE
Life of Christ;
BEING THE SUBSTANCE OF
A SERMON
On the Death of Mrs. Turner,
PREACHED AT THE
SURREY TABERNACLE,
ON
Sunday Evening, the 15th of August, 1824,
BY J. CHURCH.
“And blessed is she that believeth, for there shall be a
performance of those things which are told her from the Lord.”
LONDON:
R. WESTON, PRINTER, CROSBY ROW, SOUTHWARK.
30. SERMON, c.
John, Chap. xiv. Ver. 19.
“And because I shall Live, ye shall Live also.”
Among the many awful charges brought against backsliding Israel by
the prophet Isaiah, this was reckoned not the smallest. “The
righteous perisheth, (sleepeth) and no man layeth it to heart; and
merciful men are taken away, none considering that the righteous
are taken away from the evil to come.” The day of life—of the world
—and the professing church—is far spent—the sun is going down
over the prophets—the birds are hastening home—the labourer
returning—the substance of religion declining, and the shadows of it
are stretching out. With these solemn reflections, well may we
entreat the company and presence of the dear Redeemer, as the
disciples did. Abide with us, for it is towards evening, and the day is
far spent; the removal of the Lord’s people from us, although it is
their salvation, and affords peculiar joy to the surviving spiritual
friends and relatives that have been eye and ear witnesses of their
peaceful end; yet demands attention, reflection, self-examination,
and solemnity of mind. When God strikes he demands an hearing—
when he knocks by his messengers, affliction and death, it is—that
we may open the door, receive the message, detain the messenger,
and enquire for what purpose he is sent. For the Lord’s voice crieth
unto the city, and the man of wisdom shall see thy name; hear ye
the rod, and who hath appointed it. I consider, therefore it is our
duty to pay attention to this present affliction, for the loss of a
spiritual friend, a pious and steady member of the church, an
31. affectionate wife, a kind mother and a good neighbour. Although it
is her eternal gain, it is a grief and affliction to us; but I trust that
this, as well as every other appointed trial, was sanctified for us in
the eternal covenant of grace, and as an evidence of it, produce in
our minds its suitable effects. Death is at all times solemn and
affecting in the world, in the neighbourhood, and amongst our
acquaintance; but when sent more immediately into our families, to
bereave us of those who are very dear to our hearts, we are the
more sensibly touched with the stroke, when the Lord says to us, as
he did to the prophet Ezekiel, “Son of man, behold I take away from
thee the desire of thine eyes with a stroke; and at even my wife
died.” [4]
Such painful dispensations are most keenly felt; and while
we deplore the ravages of death, we cannot help reverting to its
instrumental cause—“Sin, which brought death into the world, and
all our woe:” to this king of terrors, and often a terror to kings, all
have submitted but two, Enoch and Elijah; and all must submit,
except those of the people of God, who will be found alive at the
second coming of our Lord; these will probably experience a
momentary change, equivalent to the stroke of death, and be
changed body and soul, in the twinkling of an eye. This great
mystery was revealed to the apostle Paul; perhaps, the first that was
ever led to know it. All beside, the Lord’s people as well as the
world at large, must pass through the gloomy territories of this king:
but, the dear Saviour has engaged to go with all his people, and
conduct them safely through; and though all do not go through with
the same joy, yet all are led on safely. Their enemies keep still as a
stone, while the purchased people passed over. Nothing, in heaven
above or the earth beneath, can possibly prevent the execution of
the decreed sentence, “Dust thou art and unto dust shalt thou
return.” It is the pulling down of the house,—it must come down—
the leprosy is in it,—sin has entered every room in the house; and in
consequence of bad tenants, which occupy it, the Almighty Landlord
has ordered us to quit it; we have received, with many a pain, a writ
of ejectment; but we feel reluctant to leave this house of clay,
though in such a damaged state; the indescribable unity which
32. subsists between the soul and the body, like mutual friends, renders
parting painful here, although they have often been clogs to each
other; but they will meet again under the most glorious and happy
circumstances in the resurrection morning. And what soul can
conceive the joyful meeting of the glorified spirit, and the newly-
raised, beautiful, immortalized body? Each will know its own again.
—“Nor shall the conscious soul
Mistake its partner, but amidst the crowd,
Singling its other half, into its arms
Shall rush, with all the impatience of a man
That’s new come home; and having long been absent,
With haste runs over different rooms,
In pain to see the whole. Thrice happy meeting!
Nor time nor death shall ever part them more.”
But however dear to each other, the union must be dissolved; the
bands and ligaments, by which soul and body are united, must be
separated; this earthly house must be dissolved;—this tabernacle
must be removed—its cords unpinned—its stakes pulled up—and the
whole must be taken down. “Knowing,” saith the apostle, “I must
put off the earthly house of this my tabernacle.” Death is
represented as a departure—it is going from one house to another—
it is a loosing from port, and launching into the ocean.—Death is the
ship or boat which wafts us over to the shores of eternity. It is
going the way of all the earth—going a journey to man’s long home
—to an invisible world—through a dark valley, where we need a
guide; and a Covenant God has promised to guide us through.—It is
going to sleep in hope of waking again, sweetly refreshed in the
morning of the resurrection; fresh, lively, active, and divinely fitted
for heavenly exercises. The shipwrecked mariner has gained the
shore;—the weary traveller—the fatigued labourer—the afflicted
child, is at rest. Death, through covenant mercy, is the full, the final
deliverance. And John is commanded, by God the Holy Spirit, to
write it down, and send it to the churches: “Blessed are the dead
which die in the Lord, even so saith the spirit, for they rest from
33. their labours, and their works of faith and love do follow them.” Like
Abraham leaving his native country at the command of God;—like
Jacob leaving Padan Aram, with all his substance, to return to his
kindred. Such the believer’s death. Perhaps, indeed, a thousand
alarms may seize his spirit, hearing that Esau, with his armed men,
is coming out against him; but by prayer and faith he obtains the
blessings, and meets Esau with comfort. For when a man’s ways,
through grace, by prayer and faith, thus please the Lord, he makes
even death to be at peace with him. Death is the enemy to our
natures, although it is a covenant blessing. The last enemy that
shall be destroyed, is death: but its enmity is slain in the death of
Christ. Here that serpent that crawled up the hill of Calvary, and
entwined round the cross, left his sting in the sacred body of a dying
Saviour: nor can all the powers of darkness, all the sins,
backslidings, and infirmities of God’s people, ever unite the sting to
death again. Sin is abolished; the guilt is gone.—It has been said,
that when a bee has fastened its sting in a man’s flesh, it is lost for
ever after, and becomes a drone. Death, like such a bee, can only
hum and affright, but never sting or hurt: it may, it must destroy the
body, but it cannot hurt; like a fierce dog, whose teeth are broken
out, it can bark and tear a mere tattered coat, but it cannot bite to
the bone. What a feeble weak enemy is death, since it took a walk
to Mount Calvary! Unatoned guilt is the sting of death. But the
Lord’s dear people are led, in some degree, to see for themselves,
that Christ has borne away their guilt, has removed the iniquity of
that land in one day; and when we are cheered, quickened,
strengthened, and well-established in this pleasing fact, this hope-
supporting, spirit-giving, soul-animating assurance, we feel ready to
go, to depart, and be for ever with the Lord, in this sweet well-
founded confidence:—
“Lord, let me rest my head, close last these eyes,
Yield thee my breath; and, with exulting soul,
Smile a peace-uttered, dying, sweet Amen.”
34. But amidst the dissolutions made by death, what an unspeakable
mercy it is for the Lord’s dear people, the union betwixt Christ and
their souls can never be dissolved: they are his property, his
children, his bride; he is precious to them in life and death, as the
blessed effect of his love to them, and their value in his sight.
Hence, it is said, “Since thou wast precious in my sight thou hast
been honourable, and I have loved thee;” and precious shall their
blood be in his sight; and as they are precious to him living, it is
written, “Precious in the sight of the Lord, is the death of his saints;”
nor should their death be grievous to us, especially dying in lively
hope, cheerful confidence, sweet assurance, clear views, and fervent
desires. This is the blessed effect of the glorious union between
Christ and the soul, as the eternal spring of life, and the glorious
head of his body, the church, who has graciously declared in most
positive terms, “Because I live ye shall live also.” These most
blessed words were very precious to our dear departed friend; upon
one occasion, after a season of peculiar trial, while at the ordinance
of the Lord’s Supper, and just receiving the cup, these words were
sweetly dropped into her mind—they were ever precious to her
afterwards: she chose them for her funeral text; and blessed be
God, she most divinely understands them, now in perfect
enjoyment; they have been much blest to thousands, and I trust the
Lord will bless them to us in noticing the gracious declaration and
the precious promise as connected with it.
Let us notice the life of our most adorable Saviour. First, as God—
He liveth from eternity; he is the living God, he is emphatically called
life, the true God, and our eternal life; and this is the eternal life
which John says was manifested: the very knowledge of whom is
eternal life begun in the soul. In his divine essence, his eternal
nature, he is the self-existent, independent Jehovah; underived,
unoriginated, and incommunicably God, without beginning,
succession, or end; without the shadow of a change; he is eternal,
immortal, who only hath immortality from everlasting to everlasting;
and of his years there is no end; one in the divine Trinity, co-equal,
co-essential, and co-eternal with the Father and the Holy Spirit; one
35. in the sacred society of the adorable Trinity, enjoying the most
inconceivable delight and complacency in his own divine perfections;
and in the holy ones, the Father and the Spirit; the divine nature,
essence, and perfections were not communicated to him as God, but
were originally, independently, and eternally his own, in conjunction
with the Father, and the Holy Spirit—and as the self-existent God, he
has solemnly declared to all the enemies of his Godhead—“If ye
believe not that “I AM”—ye shall die in your sin.”—This awful truth,
one would think, is enough to put to silence all the cavil in the world
against the divinity of the Son of God, as God. Some indeed admit
all that can be said about his divinity, but they vainly suppose that
his Godhead was communicated to him from the Father; but this
thought is an awful insult upon him, no better than high treason and
daring blasphemy. Let such read again and tremble,—“If ye believe
not that I AM—ye shall die in your sins.” “I AM,” is the self-existent,
independent God—and as the living God, he is author of all the life
which has been, or shall be given to creatures; in him was life, for
by him were all things made, and by him do all things subsist,
created by him, and upheld by him; and, while I exist as God, ye
shall live also.
2.—As the Son of God in his divine person, which implies his eternal
relationship to the Father, he lived in eternity as a person existing
with the Father; He is in the bosom of the father, the only begotten
of the Father, the express image of the Father, the son of God,
without the consideration of the human nature, either body or soul.
He was a divine person: the human nature did not make him a
person; but the Son of God did take the human nature into union
with himself, and though possessing two natures he is but one
person. As the adorable son of God, he lived before all the world, a
life with the Father—a life of inconceivable delight. Hence the Father
has said of his dear son, “in whom my soul delighteth;” and the dear
Son of God has said of the Father, “I was daily his delight—
constantly and invariably rejoicing—always before him—delighting in
the Father before the world was rejoicing,” that he possessed the
same nature, being, and perfections, and that he stood in such a
36. relation to him as the Son of the Father—and “because I live as the
Son of God, ye shall live also.”
3.—As the Head of the Church.—In this most blessed relation he
ever lived, does now, and ever will; he is their head as a general is
head to his army; as a king is head to his subjects; as a husband is
head to his wife; as a father is head to his children; as a master is to
his servants; but besides these, our most blessed Lord is that to his
people as the natural head is to the natural body; and the members
of it, of the same nature with it; superior to it; communicates life,
sense, and motion to it; overlooks and protects it; he is the
representative head of his body, the church; being united to him, we
are in him, and have a representative existence in him; he was
chosen to be the head of the elect family, out of the boundless love
of God the Father; and they were chosen in him. Eternal election
gives us a subsistence, a representative being, in Christ; he lives in
God’s eternal mind and love, as the head of the church, and his
people live in him, and shall live for ever in him; nor sin, nor time,
nor death, can part them. Christ as head, and his people were
chosen together; He first, in order of nature, as the head, and they
as members; as in the womb, head and members are not conceived
apart, but together, so was the church and Christ in the womb of
eternal election. God views us in him, and never did, nor never will,
consider his dear people separate from him as the chosen head of
the chosen body. All other blessings flow to us from, and by virtue
of, this union. We live in Christ, we have a covenant subsistence
and representative being in him; and as the root, the trunk, the
branches, and leaves, are folded up in the acorn, so all God’s family
are in Christ, and shall be brought forth in their appointed time; their
adoption, justification, redemption, preservation, pardon, calling,
perseverance, resurrection, and glorification, all depend upon their
election union,—and this union depends upon the everlasting love of
God; it is not faith that unites to the Lamb, that is only a spiritual
faculty given to us by the holy spirit, to discern this blessing, which
leads forth the mind, in affection and gratitude, to a covenant God
for it. This union is dated from eternity, revealed in the word,
37. preached in the gospel, manifested in our effectual calling, enjoyed
by faith, and will be celebrated in the most open and glorious
manner, in the thousand years personal reign of our Lord Jesus
Christ upon earth, and blessed are they that are called to the
marriage supper of the Lamb. Nothing done by he church of God,
before or after calling, can destroy this union. In the very existence
of Christ, as head, they must live—“For because I live, ye shall live
also.”
4.—As Mediator—he ever did, now does, and ever will, live for his
people; and in his glorious title as the son of God, as God-man, he
has received all blessings for his church; and these are
comprehended under the term LIFE. The Lord hath commanded his
blessing, even life for evermore; and as the Father hath life in
himself, even so hath he given to the son to have life in himself.
Christ, as God-man lived in the purpose of God from eternity; and
though he is compared to many things which have not life—to water,
to bread, to a stone, a way, a tree—yet they have these additions,
living water, living bread, living stone, living way, tree of life. In this
most blessed character the ancient saints saw him by faith, received
him, and lived and died upon him. Job’s faith was fixed here, and
rose to sweet confidence, to full assurance—“I know that my
redeemer liveth”—yes, now—in this character before God for me,
and I see my interest in him. Every believer is now more or less
thus favoured. God gives, 1st. Faith to believe in him as such—
2ndly. To rely upon him—and, 3rdly. To enjoy interest in him. He
lives, the ever-living Mediator; considered as God-man, he is the
Mediator of union between God and his creatures—as elect—both
angels and men; and he is the Mediator of reconciliation for his
church, as fallen; as the Head of the Church, and the Son of God, he
was called to act for her as fallen; and when declared Son of God by
the Father, he was sworn into his office as High Priest; to which, in
the boundless love of his heart, he gave his consent to make
reconciliation for the sins of his people, to give perfect satisfaction,
and to harmonize all the sacred perfections of Jehovah. In this most
sacred character he appeared in heaven as the Lamb slain, from the
38. foundation of the world; to him the old testament church looked,
and in the fullness of time, he came and began his work in the
wonderful and mysterious act of his incarnation:—made of a woman
—made under the law, he was circumcised, and became a debtor to
fulfil the whole law for his people. The nature that he assumed,
although it was perfectly flesh and blood, yet it was perfectly holy.
Hence his appeal to God the Judge of all: “Search me, O, God, and
try me, and see if there be any wicked way in me.” His human
nature was a holy thing; and possessed in it more holiness than all
the angels of light; and in it, he did all the churches’ duty in
obedience to the law; he obeyed the ceremonial law as the seed of
Abraham, and kept the law of God in thought, mind, will, and deed
perfectly. He worshipped one God, never bowed to creatures, or
profaned the holy name: honored the sabbath and his parents; nor
felt a base desire; nor tinged with sinful anger, much less murder;
nor with heart or hand did he ever rob God or man; nor ever bore
false witness against any; nor could a covetous thought enter his
sacred breast; but with his whole nature loved God and his
neighbour, and did unto all men what men in their doings ought to
do to each other. This he performed for us; and, in consequence of
the essential dignity of his person, as God as well as man, He is
styled Jehovah, our righteousness. This is imputed and placed to
the account of his people by the Father. God the Holy Spirit opens
the grand subject to us, we receive it in the mind and affections.
Conscience testifying this, we have peace with God. In this
righteousness the church is perfected; in it they stand justified
before God, and shall never come in to condemnation. But in his
glorious character as Mediator, his having become surety for his
people, he had to pay the dreadful debt of suffering the awful
penalty. As the consequence of the sins of his church, he engaged
to endure the hell we had merited. The curse of a broken law, and
all which that awful idea contains. He took the bitter draught, the
dreadful cup, and drank eternal health to his dear people.
“He sunk beneath our heavy woes.”
39. All our guilt met on him—the chastisement due to us he bore—the
pangs of the damned seized his holy soul; and with convulsive
struggles on the ground, with heart-rending sighs, and prayers, and
tears; with thorns, scourges, contempt, griefs, and unknown
agonies, awful storms, and inconceivable torments, he sweat out,
cried out, and bled out the sins of his people. He by himself purged
our sins—the physician’s heart was opened by a spear to heal all the
diseases of his patients—was ever love like this?
“Our ransom paid in blood for deadliest guilt—
Oh! hide thy shame-spread face, and turn thy eyes
In mournful prospect back to Calvary, now
Back to the garden, to the dolorous ground,
Grief-moistened with his blood-sweat agony.
Ah, what agony! ah! felt for whom?
Say, angel, near him then that heard: ‘Behold
Thy humbled Maker’—agonized thyself—
Asked, but thou canst not say.—No thought can pierce
Of man or angel, that profound of pains:—
’Twas the soul’s travail, sorrow’s sharpest throe.”
As our surety, sponsor, representative, and mediator, he has put
away all our sins; he died, he rose, he triumphed over all his and our
foes, and kindly speaks to us—“Fear not, I am he that liveth, was
dead, am alive for evermore, and because I live, ye shall also.”
While he lived upon earth, he lived a life of faith, hope, dependance,
love, humility, and holy zeal, and the believer’s privilege is to live and
say, as he lives, “The life I live in the flesh, I live by the faith of the
son of God”—a life of faith, dependance, hope, confidence, love,
humility, and zeal, though daily interrupted, and the subject of much
deadness, carnality, and unbelief; yet as fresh life is given from his
fulness, I possess a life that will never die. The Lord has promised
to water his people every moment—“every thing liveth where this
water comes; and it is in the believer, a well, springing up to eternal
life.” And as we use the means, we sing, “Spring up, O, well.” Sing
ye unto it: for as well the singers as the players on instruments, shall
40. be there. All my fresh springs in Thee, who hast said, “because I
live, ye shall live also.”
4.—His life of intercession and advocacy in heaven. Hence the
apostle declares, that “he ever liveth to make intercession for all that
come unto God by him;” and as we have been redeemed and
reconciled to God by his death; much more, being reconciled, we
shall be saved by his life. He appears in the high court of heaven for
us, in the full virtue of his blood, and righteousness—
“Looks like a lamb, that’s newly slain,
And wears his priesthood still.”
This is ever available to the Father for us; he is our priest before the
throne, carrying on the work of manifestatives. Salvation, the great
sacrifice, once offered, has infinitely more voices for us before God,
than all our sins can have against us. His blood is said to speak for
us; it cries aloud to the God of justice for the church; yea, for every
sensible sinner, that mercy might be shewn, and pardon enjoyed by
him upon the ground of strict justice, truth, holiness, righteousness,
and judgment; it speaks for us to God—and to us from God—“I have
loved thee, I have redeemed thee, I have called thee, thou art
mine.” Our great high priest bears all the names of his dear people
upon his heart, and though exalted above all principalities and
powers, he cannot forget his poor relations on earth. The days of
his passion are ended, but not of his compassion. Our spiritual
Joseph, though Lord of all, is not ashamed to own his brethren, the
poor. Many, when exalted, forget their former poor acquaintances;
but our ever-living, ever-loving, everlasting friend, has sworn by
himself as the living God—“I will not forget you;” he lives in heaven
for his people; by his death he paid the debt; by his resurrection he
came out of prison; and by his ascension he shews himself openly to
God, the creditor, and pleads satisfaction; he in acting in heaven as
our advocate with the Father; he is the faithful friend at the bar of
justice, answering all the charges that sin, natural conscience, and
Satan, can accuse us of. Hence, for his people, he gives the
41. challenge—“who is mine adversary, let him come near,” and by the
apostle asks, “who shall lay any thing (unpardoned) to the charge of
God’s elect, seeing he maketh intercession with God,” and this
precious portion has warned and cheered thousands. “My little
children, I write these things unto you, that you sin not; but if any
man sin, we have an advocate with the Father,” and such an
advocate must carry the cause; he has never failed—and demands
no fee, but the fruit of the lips giving thanks to his name; and while
his personal appearance in heaven has any virtue before God, his
mourning disciples are safe, to whom he has said, “and because I
live, ye shall live also.”
5.—His life of glory in heaven. He is the very glory of the place. We
say at times, of some persons, they are the very life of the company
—Christ will be the very bliss, the very joy, the very life of the church
above for ever, when he is surrounded with all his blood-bought
throng, and with all his holy loving angels; the lamb in the midst will
make all their heaven; his person, his glory, his looks, his smile, his
love, will feast their happy minds to all eternity; while the glorious
majesty of God shall be enjoyed, through the all glorious body of
Jesus Christ, as the rainbow round the throne, to behold this glory.
The Lord has made choice of his people, set them apart for this very
purpose, redeemed them to God, called, fitted, qualified their souls,
and will raise them up again in the last day, and for this the
Redeemer prays and demands, “Father, I will that those whom thou
hast given be with me, where I am, that they may behold my
glory,”—and as he smiles, they will sing—or,
“Overwhelmed with raptures sweet,
Sink down, adoring at his feet.”
And what adds a blessing to the whole is, that this bliss, this felicity,
will be for ever; yea, lasting as the very existence of him, who, for
the everlasting consolation of his people, hath said, “and because I
live, ye shall live also.” Our most blessed Lord is the author, giver,
and maintainer, of all natural, spiritual, and eternal life, for all live in
42. him; he is the root and spring of all the life of sanctification, and
glorification of his people, and though they are said to live in him by
faith, yet more properly it is Christ living in them. Christ liveth in me
—all the blessings of the covenant of grace are in him—the eternal
favor of God, which is our life, is in him—and this is the grace which
was given us in him before the foundation of the world; he came,
that his people might have life, and have it more abundantly in
experience and enjoyment; he came that he might abolish death,
and bring life and immortality to light by the gospel. Justifying,
pardoning, and regenerating grace, is brought to light in the word,
and often brought to light in the souls of God’s children, and they by
virtue of union to their covenant head, live—live in the love, favour,
mind, purposes, decrees, covenant, and promises of God—live in
Christ, secured, hid, locked up—where Christ is hid as head, there
they are hid—live representatively before God—live spiritually by
quickning power, and this life in the soul is the holy spirit as the
spirit of life. The Lord and giver of life, producing as an evidence of
his indwelling—a spiritual hungring and thirsting after the favor of
God, the sense of pardon, holiness, love, and communion, humility,
self-abhorrence, spiritual repentance, holy confidence, resignation,
and joy—and where these are found in the soul, by divine teaching
they are the evidences of being disciples indeed, and it is to such
genuine disciples our dear Lord speaks in the sweet language of the
text—“ye see me; and because I live, ye shall live also.” Such
indeed was our dear departed friend—spiritually quickened and
made alive to God, she possessed those immortal principles which
supported her through the changing scenes of her pilgrimage—
cheered her heart at times—subdued her fears—brought her mind to
God—endeared the Saviour—bowed her will to the Lord’s will—and
caused her to long to be dissolved, and to be with Christ: to grace,
and grace alone, she attributed all her salvation from first to last;
her soul hated every system that was calculated to exalt the
creature in any sense whatever. Convinced deeply of the depravity
of the human heart, she was often led to self-abasement, self-
loathing, and self-condemnation, taught out of God’s law—she felt
her need of a surety, a mediator, a law fulfiller, a better
43. righteousness than her own; she saw the way of forgiveness by the
great atoning sacrifice of Christ; and was taught to believe, to
receive Christ with his whole finished salvation; she loved to hear
him extolled; his very name was precious to her; his word was dear
to her; she loved his people who stood manifest to her conscience,
that they were taught of God; she highly esteemed those ministers,
whom she considered faithful to God, to truth, and to souls; she
prized the ordinances, because they were of divine appointment,
and because the Lord had often met her in them. Her poor mind
was often discouraged by heavy trials, within and without; her path,
in many instances, was rough; she was often in many waters; the
floods at times lifted up their waves; but here she learned the vanity
of all things below the stars, the emptiness of the creature, her own
weakness, unbelief, and rebellion, these were matters of humility to
her; but in this right though rough way, she also learnt the
faithfulness, power, wisdom, and goodness of God—the value of a
throne of grace to carry her burden to, and empty her ashes at the
foot of the altar. Her mind was seldom long from the general
infirmity of the Lord’s people, I mean the fear of death; she often
gloomily anticipated the last act, the struggle of body and soul at
parting her weak nerves, lowness, and dejection. Satan also, taking
the advantage, was frequently the cause of great distress in the
prospect; yet her dear Lord, in due time, delivered her from these
fears; and that same grace which made her willing to be saved in
God’s way, made her also willing, yea, desirous of departing, to be
with Christ. How true is the language of our poet,
“Who can take Death’s portrait true?—Fear shakes the
Pencil—Fancy loves excess—Dark ignorance is lavish of
Her shades—and these the formidable picture draws:
Man forms a death that nature never made;
Then on the point of his own fancy falls,
And feels a thousand deaths, in fearing one.”
None, indeed, return from the grave to tell us what it is; but it is well
known, that most of those who have been much troubled in mind all
44. their days, have had the most serene moments at last. That God,
who has delivered in six troubles, has always been found faithful in
the seventh, the last.—Descending into the waters of Jordan, the
deep has never swallowed them up: they have found the rock of
ages for their feet to stand upon, at the bottom of the brook.
I remember, after a season of long and painful affliction our dear
friend was enabled to come up to chapel. I was totally ignorant of
her coming: but previous to this, I could find no portion of scripture
to speak on but this: “And came to deliver them who, all their life-
time, were subject to bondage, through fear of death.” This was the
last sermon she ever heard: and the truths contained in it, she
sweetly felt. Her direful complaint increased. Her sufferings were
very great indeed. And as all other persons in like sorrows, so she
ebbed and flowed in mind; but her God was with her in her final
hour.—
“Her final hour brought glory to her God.”
In point of gospel principles, she was always at a point: but at times
sorely troubled about an interest in Christ, by reason of the cloud
that cometh betwixt. But every fresh smile from the Saviour, every
sweet word dropped into her mind. Frequently reading the word
and precious hymns, the visits of God’s dear people and humble
prayer relieved her again.
The last visit I paid her, I perceived she was near home. Not being
able to speak for a time, I feared she would speak no more: but
after waiting a little while, (as a proof of what her mind was fixed
upon) she exclaimed, with peculiar solemnity, “By thine agony and
bloody sweat, by thy cross and passion, by thy precious death and
burial, by thy glorious resurrection and ascension, good Lord deliver
me!” Here, on this rock her faith was built in life, and firm in death.
A friend asked her if she was happy. After pausing, she said,
“Happy, happy! I know that Christ died for sinners, and it is there I
am fixed.” She requested the twelfth chapter of Isaiah to be read to
her. While reading, she said, “How precious!” and begged to hear it
45. again. At the last verse, “Cry out and shout thou inhabitant of Zion,”
she said, “Do so, do so; for our God is a great God.” Soon after this,
she repeated, in a very peculiar manner, the whole of Mr. Hart’s
hymn:
“Christ is the friend of sinners, be that forgotten never.”
On this she commented as she went on, in a most striking manner.
One thing she observed: “Oh, it is easy to say we are sinners, but
hard to feel it. Yes it is the righteousness of Christ that I must
appear in before God—nothing but the work of a precious Christ
wherein I can stand justified before God, and whether I sink or swim
I am fixed there.” She then wished to hear the eighth chapter of
Acts; and coming to the fifth verse, she seemed delighted. “Philip
went down to Samaria, and preached Christ unto them.” “He did not
tell them some great nobleman was coming to bestow great riches
upon them; but he went simply to preach Christ to poor sinners.”
She then repeated the sweet verses: “Not all the blood of beasts,
c.” She begged the prayers of the Church when they met; and
often asked if she had been remembered by them. To those around
her, she said, “Oh, do beg of the Lord to cut the thread, for I long to
be with him.” Then she said:
“The holy triumphs of my soul,
Shall death itself out-brave;
Leave dull mortality behind,
And fly beyond the grave.”
One of her dear daughters telling her, she would soon be with her
dear Jesus, she said, “do you think I shall, you have told me so so
many times—Oh, why is he so long coming.” Soon after, finding
herself very low, nature sinking, and feeling she was going, she said
to her daughter: “Are yon alone? call up the rest of the family:” and
while standing around her, they witnessed her struggle. But
recovering, she burst into tears. “Come back again! dear Lord! I
thought that I was going! how long, Lord.” She requested a
46. gentleman to fetch a doctor, merely to let her know, by her pulse,
the pleasing news, that she was near her end. On being informed
she was near, she was more composed. At one time, she exclaimed:
“As the hart panteth after the water-brooks, so panteth my soul after
thee, O, God.—I want to drink at the fountain.” Lifting up her hands,
as if filled with increased joy, she said; “Too much, dear Lord—dear
Jesus, I want to embrace thee, as thou dost embrace me.” She
begged they would lift her poor suffering arm out of bed, that she
might embrace her dear Jesus. Some sweet verses were spoken to
her, on the soul’s entrance into glory. She said: “Jesus said unto the
woman, ‘Go, and sin no more.’” “Now,” said she, “is the time for
that; those words used once to distress me; but Christ the Heavenly
Lamb takes all our sins away—that is where I rest.” One of her
daughters said, “Upon the rock still, mother?” She answered: “None
but Jesus!—look up to the Lord for me.—Why are his chariot wheels
so long in coming?” Just before her departure, she said to her
husband, waving her hand: “All is well.” Mr. King and Mr. Borrows
coming into the room—one of them observed, that though she had
lost her sight, what a mercy that the light and holy fire in the
tabernacle, should never go out—nor never be put out. On hearing
these words, she waved her hand; and presently, without a sigh, she
breathed her last.
And blessed are the dead which thus die in the Lord: all the Lord’s
people die safe—all die in faith. They all die in peace and friendship
with God and conscience. But this is meeting death, and finishing
the warfare in militant glory. May the dear family, who were kind,
affectionate, and perpetually attentive to her, experience the like
grace in death—sweetly sleep in Jesus; and whatever may be their
fears in life—Oh, that their end may be blessed.
“Shudder not to pass the stream,
Rest with all thy care on him;
Him whose dying love and power,
Still’d its tossing, hush’d its roar.
Safe is the expanding wave,
47. Gentle as a summer’s eve;
Not an object of his care
Ever suffered shipwreck there.”
And while we thus record the riches of sovereign grace, as
experienced in life and death, by our dear departed friend, we must
not, we cannot, forget the memory of departed worth. Again,
another friend in the Lord, a lover of his truth, a respectable
member of the church, Mrs. Walton, who sat just before Mrs. Turner,
in the chapel; a debtor to grace indeed; she was the daughter of a
most respectable and pious deacon of a church, who was much
esteemed for his piety and usefulness—beloved of his God, and by
those who knew him—and after a life of usefulness in the church,
was suddenly called home to a grace-provided glory. While at
chapel, he had joined in singing the hymn before the sermon; the
minister gave out his text—“Oh come taste and see that the Lord is
gracious; blessed is the man that trusteth in him,”—when he was
seized with death, and shortly after expired; to the grief of his
family, the church, and the neighbourhood. Our departed friend was
of course religiously educated, which is no small mercy impressed by
grace; at a very early period of her life, the Lord led her to see her
own state, as a sinner before God, and gradually drew her mind into
a spiritual acquaintance with divine truth—led her soul to the
glorious person, and finished work of Christ, as her refuge, surety,
atonement, righteousness, and advocate—here she often found rest
and peace—these important truths were the very delight of her soul,
when she thought, read, conversed, or heard of them—she loved the
truth, as it is in Jesus, nor would she attend any place of worship
where she thought the Minister was shy of any precious doctrine of
the gospel—she was decided, though far from being disputatious;
and as grace made her so, the Lord fulfilled his promise in her soul’s
experience—“Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also
will keep thee in the hour of temptation, and if any man love me,
and keep my words, I also will love him” (manifestatively); but like
almost all the family of God, she often experienced much lowness,
dejection, fear, unbelief, and doubtings; sweetly revived again, the
48. graces of the holy spirit gained the victory over these sad
corruptions of the human heart. Sinking and rising, rising and
sinking in mind, was her experience till victorious grace gained the
conquest in death. For
“To patient faith the prize is sure,
And all, who to the end endure
The cross, shall wear the crown.”
Her attendance upon the word was early, constant, and uniform—as
a wife, a relation, a neighbour, and a friend, few could equal her—
diffident, humble, and serious, loving, kind, peaceable, and
benevolent, none perhaps exceeded her; and this she was by the
power of electing grace. How great her gain, how deep the loss of
all who were related to her in her respectable family, and in the
church of God; possessing a spiritual knowledge of Christ, precious
faith in him, a hope that maketh not ashamed, founded alone on the
person, blood, and righteousness of the Son of God, love to his
person, to his truth, his people, his ministers, his ways, and works,
evidenced her eternal election of God, her complete redemption
from the ruins of the fall, and that the work of grace was genuine on
heart, carried by the arms of divine power and faithfulness. She
persevered, because carried to the end of her days; this is indeed
the privilege of all the Lord’s people. For in his love, and in his pity,
he saved them, bare them, and carried them all their days; nor can
there be any final perseverance of the saints, but as they are carried
—
“But he that hath loved them, bears them through,
And makes them more than conquerors too.
Hallelujah.”
However dear the Lord’s people may be to their families, or to the
church on earth; as sinners, all must bow to the awful sentence of
“dust thou art, and to dust thou must return.”—Even
49. “An angel’s arm can’t snatch me from the grave;
Legions of Angels can’t confine me there.”
An old divine of the last century remarks that “mankind are like
sheep grazing upon a common—death is the butcher appointed to
take away first one and then another.” Surely then we may ask who
next shall be summoned away, my merciful God is it I?
What a mercy for the people of God they cannot die unprepared—
none unfit; the grace that provided the kingdom has provided a
fitness for it, in the person and work of the dear Redeemer, and in
the effectual operations of the holy-making God the Divine Spirit;
and without this holiness no man shall see the Lord—without this
holy change of state, of principle, and of pursuit, none can enjoy
either the liberty of the Gospel now, or the glory beyond the grave;
and however the wicked may be driven away in his wickedness, the
righteous hath hope in his death, “for thou shalt come to thy grave
in full age, like a shock of corn, that cometh in his season, fully
ripened for the heavenly garner.” Such was our dear departed friend
—deeply afflicted in body, such as baffled all human skill; she
gradually descended to the grave, sweetly supported, kept up by
mighty grace, and consoled by the word of truth. She beheld her
pious and affectionate family around her. On one occasion she had
been remarkably low in thinking of death, when the Lord kindly, but
very powerfully whispered to her heart, “blessed are the dead which
die in the Lord, even so saith the Spirit.” This sweet sentence being
clothed with such energy delivered her mind from all fears of death.
Often did she exclaim “oh! why is the Lord so long in coming? come,
come Lord, I long to be at home;” and although her sufferings were
great, her faculties were kept amazingly strong, so much as to
enable her to repeat the whole of her favorite hymn she had often
heard sung at the chapel, on preparation to meat God, ending with
—
“And if pale death to me appears,
Creating new alarming fears,
50. My last appeal to Calvary’s blood,
And I’m prepar’d to meet my God.”
One of her affectionate family read to her the 40th Isaiah, and
sweetly commented upon it, which she very much enjoyed. Her
desire to depart and be with Christ seemed to increase, and her
affliction continuing still, she hastened quickly to meet the last
enemy of her nature, though the covenant friend of her soul;
prayerful, sincerely, solemnly, and composedly she breathed her soul
into the hands of her redeeming Lord; she slept in peace—she fell
asleep in Jesus, and experienced all that is contained, in the
precious declaration, “blessed are the dead which die in the Lord.”—
Her sun sweetly set to rise in another horizon, where it will never be
clouded—never set again—never, no never go down: but there the
Lord is her everlasting light—her God—her glory; and the days of
her mourning are for ever over.
“Forbear the righteous to deplore,
They enter into rest;
Released from care, and sin, and woe,
To everlasting bliss they go,
And learn what they might doubt below,
To die is to be blest.”
51. Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and
personal growth!
ebookultra.com