Continuous Alignment

PM World Today – April 2011 (Vol. XIII, Issue IV)

PM WORLD TODAY – FEATURED PAPER – APRIL 2011

Continuous Alignment in Engineering & Construction
Programs Utilizing a Program Management Approach

By Bob Prieto

Alignment of project participants, especially during the pre-project planning phase is a
recognized key to project success.1 Alignment activities within a project context are
focused on defining, understanding and meeting project objectives by the various
project participants.

Source: Fluor

Within a program context the same raison d’etre exists but with even greater influence
on overall program success and with a broader scope of participants and alignment
vectors. This expanded context for alignment in programs utilizing a program
management approach is described.

© 2011 Bob Prieto

PM World Today is a free monthly eJournal - Subscriptions available at http://www.pmworldtoday.net Page 1


At each stage, the basic alignment process is the same:

 Pre-alignment preparation
 Alignment meeting
 Document alignment
 Monitor alignment

This process is reflected in the following figure and one or more alignment processes
may be undertaken at each stage in order to address specific items in more depth.
Examples of alignment activities requiring separate sessions from the main alignment
activity include alignment processes focused on automation alignment; invoice process,
procedure and associated documentation; and industrial relations.

Pre-alignment Alignment Document Monitor
Preparation Meeting Alignment Alignment

Alignment Activities

Major programs face challenges of scale and complexity but fundamentally are about
the achievement of a set of well defined strategic business objectives. These strategic
business objectives or SBOs represent the most fundamental outcomes to be achieved
through the implementation of a major program. This outcomes focus versus outputs
focus represents a principle difference between programs and projects and by
extension the nature, timing and parties involved in alignment activities changes to
reflect this difference.

As we move through this paper we will see the more typical project level alignment
processes with their focus on project objectives (outputs). Programs, however, require
much earlier alignment activities to be undertaken around an organization’s Strategic
Business Objectives or SBOs to be achieved by undertaking a major program.

Strategic Business Objectives represent the fundamental business drivers in a well
executed program. But not all programs are well executed and as such understanding
how the selection and translation of strategic business objectives into program strategy
and execution affects program performance and outcomes is essential.

Equally essential is to assure top level alignment on a program’s strategic business
objectives. Lack of consensus often acts as a passive drag on many programs. A
review of large engineering and construction program experiencing scope, schedule

© 2011 Bob Prieto



and cost growth suggests that both articulation of the businesses strategic business
objectives and broad stakeholder consensus were lacking. Simply put, strategy was
flawed and organizational alignment inadequate since there was not agreement on the
fundamental strategic business objectives to be achieved.

This needed alignment around Strategic Business Objectives must begin with not only
executive alignment but equally important peer alignment since this later group’s roles,
responsibilities or authorities may be modified under a program management approach.

Strategic Business Objectives for a private, for profit company can include:

• Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
• Market share
• Satisfy a market need by providing a service
• Targeted growth rates

or a number of other quantifiable and measurable objectives. These strategic business
objectives may also include other top level objectives that define the business rationale
or approach such as:

• Patents granted
• New products launched
• Net zero carbon or other triple bottom line (TBL) objectives

For public sector owners, strategic business objectives will include more social and
environmental objectives including:

• Improved access to transportation
• Reduced congestion
• Improved access to clean water
• New jobs created
• New industries created

While the nature and form of the investment decision process will differ, each type of
owner will undertake a process that will define one or more programs to achieve these
overarching strategic business objectives while cascading elements of the SBOs down
as top level key result areas (KRAs) of individual projects.

© 2011 Bob Prieto



Alignment in major programs around Strategic Business Objectives is not confined to
internal stakeholders even though these objectives represent organizational goals. Key
external stakeholders will need to be engaged to ensure that these top level SBOs are
achievable. Examples of key external stakeholders can include:

 Major investors including founding shareholders, large institutional investors,
pension funds
 Bond holders
 Institutional lenders or others who will provide capital to achieve the program’s
objectives
 Executive Branch leadership for governmental programs
 Legislature, in general, and appropriating committees, in particular, for
government funded or subsidized projects
 Regulatory authorities for objectives requiring significant regulatory support.

Alignment with key external stakeholders is reflected in the next chart.

© 2011 Bob Prieto



Programs utilizing a dedicated program manager must achieve alignment on more than
just Strategic Business Objectives. This is essential since major programs may drive the
adoption of new engineering, procurement, construction and risk management
approaches versus an organization’s traditional approaches. The timing and nature of
involvement of many or the owner’s team’s organizational elements is likely to be
modified and without proactive alignment, friction, differing expectations and delays may
result.

The nature of strategy alignment in a major program must include not only the Program
Manager but also all those elements of the owner’s organization that collectively
encompass the owner’s team. Alignment cannot be limited to the owner’s element with
direct responsibility for Program Manager oversight.

© 2011 Bob Prieto



A key benefit of alignment activities undertaken around program strategy is the
continued fostering of alignment within the owner’s own team.

With alignment now in place for both the program’s Strategic Business Objectives as
well as its top level execution strategy, the Program Manager now turns his attention to
developing a detailed Program Execution Plan (PrEP) to implement the detailed
strategy. The PrEP will lay out detailed approaches for all program activities including
planning, studies, engineering, procurement, construction management, construction,
HSE, risk management, materials management, logistics, commissioning, startup,
testing, acceptance of work, quality, sustainability, treasury and accounting, invoicing,
payment, sustainability, stakeholder management, change control and reporting.

© 2011 Bob Prieto



The PrEP will define interactions, roles, responsibilities and authorities between the
Program Manager and Owner’s Team at a much more granular level of detail. Workflow
and work processes will be described and these may differ from those previously used
by the Owner’s Team or even components of the Program Manager. Alignment
activities at this stage are focused on getting the program execution team on the same
sheet of paper.

An effective alignment session at this stage will result in:

 Reinforcement of Strategic Business Objectives, ensuring that they cascade
down into the Program Execution Plan

 Clear linkage between the agreed to program strategy and the defined program
execution approach

 Clear, unambiguous definition of roles and responsibilities of the owner and
program management organizations. These will include the development of
detailed RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) charts.

 Key result areas (KRAs) for project success, linked to top level KPI’s associated
with the SBOs, that have been clearly defined, including associated metrics, and
agreed to by alignment participants.

 Communication channels, protocols and authorities well defined and commonly
understood by alignment participants

It is at this stage that alignment activities requiring separate sessions from the main
alignment activity including alignment focused on automation; invoicing; and industrial
relations will likely occur for the first time. These added alignment sessions will likely
cascade down to individual projects as the program gets underway.

© 2011 Bob Prieto



With an agreed to Program Execution Plan in hand the Program Manager now begins
the process of initiating the various projects that will comprise the program. Project
selection and definition are key to overall program success and alignment around these
projects would have happened between the owner and program manager at both the
strategy alignment and PrEP alignment stages.

© 2011 Bob Prieto



Project initiation activities are very much consistent with a project traditional alignment
approach with the Program Manager undertaking many of the activities the owner would
have performed in a discrete project setting.

Alignment between the Program Manager and Contractor will be explicitly around the
project outputs as distinguished from the program outcomes. Project scope, purpose,
KRAs, open issues, program or externally imposed constraints, work processes,
required approvals and value improving opportunities will all be discussed.

Separate alignment sessions may be held around automation technology and industrial
relations with the later important because of its potential program affecting nature.

Pre-alignment efforts will include extensive interviews, development of an explicit
description of outcomes desired, definition of a manageable attendee list comprised of
personnel responsible for project execution and a formal agenda.

The alignment of the Program Manager and a specific project contractor is reflected in
the next figure.

© 2011 Bob Prieto



The Program Manager’s project level alignment efforts cannot stop at this project by
project alignment process more typical of a project delivery effort. Rather the Program
Manager must recognize that the multiplicity of projects that may be competing for the
same labor, sourcing to the same suppliers, or competing for the same construction
equipment must be aligned as well.

© 2011 Bob Prieto



These multi-project alignment activities provide the program manager the ability to
identify potential issues and conflicts early. They will also provide a basis for identifying
critical controls essential for overall achievement of the program’s desired outcomes.

This alignment across projects can be seen below.

© 2011 Bob Prieto



Returning now to a specific project context, the selected project level Contractor now
prepares a Project Execution Plan (PEP) that build off the initial project alignment
session and reflects the Contractor’s approach to work, consistent with project
requirements laid out in the various contract documents including any referenced
sections of the PrEP or other program management procedures incorporated.

In many instances the Contractor’s project activities will interface with a set of external
stakeholders which may include permitting or regulatory agencies; key suppliers and
vendors; community based groups; other Contractors under management by the
Program Manager; or the general public.

Alignment with these external stakeholders is key to project success and one or more
alignment activities may be undertaken around various aspects of the project.

© 2011 Bob Prieto



Program and project level alignments are not singular activities. They are subject to
change as projects and the program evolve; as the various projects comprising the
program interact with each other; and as stakeholder involvement changes and new
program and project level issues emerge. Continuous alignment is a key task of the
Program Manager and is one of the differentiators between successful and
unsuccessful programs. While change may be inevitable, surprises that are otherwise
manageable need not be.

© 2011 Bob Prieto



Major programs move through a series of phases. Many of these phases may be linked
to the owner’s tollgate process for program and project approval. As the program moves
from one phase to another it is important for the program manager to reconfirm the
Strategic Business Objectives and continuing validity of the overall program strategy.

As each phase will likely change the nature of interaction between owner, program
manager and project level contractors it is important to undertake alignment activities to
reconfirm or re-baseline, as needed, the roles, responsibilities and authorities of
individual participants. New RACI charts may be appropriate in subsequent phases,
KRAs or associated metrics may evolve, and stakeholders may change.

This continuous alignment effort falls squarely on the shoulders of the Program
Manager. At each stage he is assuring that the necessary pre-alignment activities have
been comprehensively undertaken; effective alignment meetings conducted; alignment
documented (project purpose; roles & responsibilities; KRAs including critical success
factors; and an action plan); and achievement of the KRAs and other action plan items
carefully monitored.

© 2011 Bob Prieto



Continuous alignment in engineering and construction programs utilizing a program
management approach is essential to meeting an organization’s and program’s
Strategic Business Objectives. While the alignment process will share many
characteristics of those traditionally employed on well executed engineering projects,
the nature and timing of the various alignment activities will be much more extensive.
This is driven not only by the added scale and complexity of such programs but the
importance of understanding the issues and interfaces that exist in the “white space”
between the various projects comprising the program.

References:

1) Alignment During Pre-Project Planning; Implementation Resource 113-3, Version
2.1; Construction Industry Institute; December, 2009

2) Getting Off on the Right Foot; PM World Today; December 2010

3) Strategic Program Management; published by the Construction Management
Association of America (CMAA); ISBN 978-0-9815612-1-9; July 24, 2008

© 2011 Bob Prieto



About the Author:

Bob Prieto

Author

Bob Prieto is a Senior Vice President of Fluor Corporation,
one of America’s largest engineering, construction and
project management firms, where he is responsible for strategy in support of the
firm’s Industrial & Infrastructure Group and its key clients. He focuses on the
development, delivery and oversight of large, complex projects worldwide. Prior
to joining Fluor, Bob served as chairman of Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc. He served
as a member of the executive committee of the National Center for Asia-Pacific
Economic Cooperation, a member of the Industry Leaders’ Council of the
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), and co-founder of the Disaster
Resource Network. He currently serves on a number of committees looking at
issues related to infrastructure delivery and resiliency and disaster response and
rebuilding. Until 2006 he served as one of three U.S. presidential appointees to
the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Business Advisory Council
(ABAC) and previously served as chairman of the Engineering and Construction
Governors of The World Economic Forum and co-chair of the infrastructure task
force formed after September 11th by the New York City Chamber of
Commerce. He recently completed a ten year tenure as a member of the board
of trustees of Polytechnic University of New York culminating in its merger with
New York University. Bob is the author of “Strategic Program Management”
published by the Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) and
more recently a companion work entitled “Topics in Strategic Program
management”.

© 2011 Bob Prieto


Continuous Alignment

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Continuous Alignment (20)

More from Bob Prieto (20)

Continuous Alignment