Critically review the attached ASDA case entitled “Cracking the Code of Change
- 2. Although every business's change initiative is unique, research suggests there are two models or theories of change. These theories are based on very different and often unconscious assumptions by senior executives – and the consultants that advice them – about why and how changes should be made. Theory E is change based on economic value: ◦ Shareholder value is the only legitimate driver and measure of corporate success. ◦ Change usually involves heavy use of economic incentives, drastic layoffs, downsizing, and restructuring. Theory O is change based on organizational capability: ◦ The goal is to develop corporate culture and human capability through individual and organizational learning. ◦ Typically have strong, long-held, commitment-based psychological contracts with their employees. https://casestudyhelp.com/
- 3. Few companies subscribe to just one theory. Most companies have used a mix of both. However, managers try to apply both theories in tandem, without resolving the inherent tensions between them. Employees distrust leaders who alternate between nurturing and cutthroat corporate behavior. Recent research suggests, however, that there is a way to resolve the tension so that businesses can satisfy their shareholders while building viable institutions. Companies that effectively combine hard and soft approaches to change can reap big payoffs in profitability and productivity. https://casestudyhelp.com/
- 5. If the objective is to build a company that can adapt, survive, and prosper over the years, Theory E strategies must somehow be combined with Theory O strategies. The obvious way to combine E and O is to sequence them. But precisely because it is more difficult than mere sequencing, the simultaneous use of O and E strategies is more likely to be a source of sustainable competitive advantage. https://casestudyhelp.com/
- 6. Change efforts have gone under many banners: total quality management, reengineering, rightsizing, restructuring, cultural change, and turnaround. In almost every case, the basic goal has been the same: to make fundamental changes in how business is conducted in order to help cope with a new, more challenging market environment. The most general lesson to be learned from the more successful cases is that the change process goes through a series of phases. A second very general lesson is that critical mistakes in any of the phases can have a devastating impact. https://casestudyhelp.com/
- 7. Many changes fail. Possible reasons include: ◦ Sometimes, executives underestimate how hard it can be to drive people out of their comfort zones. ◦ Sometimes, they overestimate how successful they have already been in increasing urgency. ◦ Sometimes, they lack patience An incapable senior management often comes from having too many managers and not enough leaders. Change initiatives typically go nowhere until enough real leaders are promoted or hired into senior-level jobs. https://casestudyhelp.com/
- 8. In the most successful cases, the coalition is always pretty powerful – in terms of titles, information and expertise, reputations, and relationships. ◦ In both small and large organizations, a successful guiding team may consist of only three to five people during the first year of a renewal effort. ◦ A high sense of urgency within the managerial ranks helps enormously in putting a guiding coalition together. ◦ Someone needs to get these people together, help them develop a shared assessment of their company’s problems and opportunities, and create a minimum level of trust and communication. ◦ No matter how capable or dedicated the staff head, groups without strong line leadership never achieve the power that is required. https://casestudyhelp.com/
- 9. In a successful change management program, the guiding coalition develops a picture of the future that is relatively easy to communicate and appeals to customers, stockholders, and employees. Vision emerges after a lot of efforts from the guiding coalition through their tough analytical thinking and a little dreaming. Without a sensible vision, a transformation effort can easily dissolve into a list of confusing and incompatible projects that can take the organization in the wrong direction or nowhere at all. https://casestudyhelp.com/
- 10. In more successful transformation efforts, executives use all existing communication channels to broadcast the vision. ◦ They turn boring, unread company newsletters into lively articles about the vision. ◦ They take ritualistic, tedious quarterly management meetings and turn them into exciting discussions of the transformation. ◦ They throw out much of the company’s generic management education and replace it with courses that focus on business problems and the new vision. Most of the executives in successful cases of major change learn to “walk the talk.” Nothing undermines change more than behavior by important individuals that is inconsistent with their words. https://casestudyhelp.com/
- 11. Successful transformations begin to involve large numbers of people as the process progresses. ◦ Employees are encouraged to try new approaches, to develop new ideas, and to provide leadership. Sometimes, the obstacle is the organizational structure. Sometimes, compensation or performance-appraisal systems make people choose between the new vision and their own self-interest. Worst of all are bosses who refuse to change and who make demands that are inconsistent with the overall effort. If the blocker is a person, it is important that he or she be treated fairly and in a way that is consistent with the new vision. https://casestudyhelp.com/
- 12. Real transformation takes time, and a renewal effort risks losing momentum if there are no short- term goals to meet and celebrate. Most people won’t go on the long march unless they see compelling evidence in 12 to 24 months that the journey is producing expected results else they join the ranks of those people who have been resisting change. In a successful transformation, managers actively look for ways to obtain clear performance improvements, establish goals in the yearly planning system, achieve the objectives, and reward the people involved with recognition, promotions, and even money. Commitments to produce short-term wins help keep the urgency level up and force detailed analytical thinking that can clarify or revise visions. https://casestudyhelp.com/
- 13. Until changes sink deeply into a company’s culture, a process that can take five to ten years, new approaches are fragile and subject to regression. Instead of declaring victory, ◦ leaders of successful efforts use the credibility afforded by short-term wins to tackle even bigger problems. ◦ They understand that renewal efforts take not months but years. https://casestudyhelp.com/
- 14. Two factors are particularly important in institutionalizing change in corporate culture. ◦ The first is a conscious attempt to show people how the new approaches, behaviors, and attitudes have helped improve performance. ◦ The second factor is taking sufficient time to make sure that the next generation of top management really does personify the new approach. https://casestudyhelp.com/