SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Time-Frequency Representation of
Microseismic Signals using the
Synchrosqueezing Transform
Roberto H. Herrera, J.B. Tary and M. van der Baan
University of Alberta, Canada
rhherrer@ualberta.ca
New Time-Frequency Tool
• Research objective:
– Introduce two novel high-resolution approaches for time-frequency
analysis.
• Better Time & Frequency Representation.
• Allow signal reconstruction from individual components.
• Possible applications:
– Instantaneous frequency and modal reconstruction.
– Multimodal signal analysis.
– Nonstationary signal analysis.
• Main problem
– All classical methods show some spectral smearing (STFT, CWT).
– EMD allows for high res T-F analysis.
– But Empirical means lack of Math background.
• Value proposition
– Strong tool for spectral decomposition and denoising . One more thing … It
allows mode reconstruction.
Why are we going to the T-F domain?
• Study changes of frequency content of a signal with
time.
– Useful for:
• attenuation measurement (Reine et al., 2009)
• direct hydrocarbon detection (Castagna et al., 2003)
• stratigraphic mapping (ex. detecting channel structures) (Partyka et al.,
1998).
• Microseismic events detection (Das and Zoback, 2011)
• Extract sub features in seismic signals
– reconstruct band‐limited seismic signals from an improved spectrum.
– improve signal-to-noise ratio of the attributes (Steeghs and
Drijkoningen, 2001).
– identify resonance frequencies (microseismicity). (Tary & van der
Baan, 2012).
The Heisenberg Box
FT  Frequency Domain
STFT  Spectrogram (Naive TFR)
CWT  Scalogram
𝜎𝑡 𝜎𝑓 ≥
1
4𝜋
Time
Domain
All of them share the same limitation:
The resolution is limited by the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle!
There is a trade-off between frequency and time resolutions
The more precisely the position is determined,
the less precisely the momentum is known in
this instant, and vice versa.
--Heisenberg, uncertainty paper, 1927
http://www.aip.org/history/heisenberg/p08.htm
Hall, M. (2006), first break, 24, 43–47.
Gabor Uncertainty Principle
• Localization: How well two spikes
in time can be separated from
each other in the transform
domain. (Axial Resolution)
• Frequency resolution: How well
two spectral components can be
separated in the frequency
domain.
𝜎𝑡 = ± 5 ms
𝜎𝑓= 1/(4𝜋*5ms)  ± 16 Hz
Hall, M. (2006), first break, 24, 43–47.
𝜎𝑡 𝜎𝑓 ≥
1
4𝜋
The Heisenberg Box
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
Choice of analysis window:
Narrow window  good time resolution
Wide window (narrow band)  good frequency resolution
Extreme Cases:
(t)  excellent time resolution, no frequency resolution
(f) =1  excellent frequency resolution (FT), no time information
0
t
(t)
0

1
F(j)




 dtett tj
)()]([F 1
0



t
tj
e
1)( F
t
Constant Q
cf
Q
B

f0 2f0 4f0 8f0
B 2B 4B 8B
B B B B BB
f0 2f0 3f0 4f0 5f0 6f0
STFTCWT
Time-frequency representations
• Non-parametric methods
• From the time domain to the frequency domain
• Short-Time Fourier Transform - STFT
• S-Transform - ST
• Continuous Wavelet Transform – CWT
• Synchrosqueezing transform – SST
• Parametric methods
• Time-series modeling (linear prediction filters)
• Short-Time Autoregressive method - STAR
• Time-varying Autoregressive method - KS (Kalman Smoother)
The Synchrosqueezing Transform (SST)
- CWT (Daubechies, 1992)
*1
( , ) ( ) ( )sW a b s t
a
d
a
t
t
b


 
Ingrid Daubechies
Instantaneous frequency is the time derivative
of the instantaneous phase
𝜔 𝑡 =
𝑑𝜃(𝑡)
𝑑𝑡
(Taner et al., 1979)
- SST (Daubechies, 2011)
the instantaneous frequency 𝜔𝑠(𝑎, 𝑏) can be computed as the derivative
of the wavelet transform at any point (𝑎, 𝑏) .
( , )
( , )
( , )
s
s
s
W a bj
a b
W a b b




Last step: map the information from the time-scale plane to the time-frequency plane.
(𝑏, 𝑎) → (𝑏, 𝜔𝑠(𝑎, 𝑏)), this operation is called “synchrosqueezing”
SST – Steps
Synchrosqueezing depends on the continuous wavelet transform and reassignment
Seismic signal 𝑠(𝑡)
Mother wavelet 𝜓(𝑡)  𝑓, Δ𝑓
CWT 𝑊𝑠(𝑎, 𝑏)
IF 𝑤𝑠 𝑎, 𝑏
Reassignment step:
Compute Synchrosqueezed function 𝑇𝑠 𝑓, 𝑏
Extract dominant curves from
𝑇𝑠 𝑓, 𝑏
Time-Frequency
Representation
Reconstruct signal
as a sum of modes
Reassignment procedure:
Placing the original wavelet coefficient 𝑊𝑠(𝑎, 𝑏) to the
new location 𝑊𝑠(𝑤𝑠 𝑎, 𝑏 , 𝑏)  𝑇𝑠 𝑓, 𝑏
Auger, F., & Flandrin, P. (1995).
Dorney, T., et al (2000).
Extracting curves
Synthetic Example 1
Noiseless synthetic signal 𝑠 𝑡 as the sum of the
following components:
𝑠1 𝑡 = 0.5 cos 10𝜋𝑡 , 𝑡 = 0: 6 𝑠
𝑠2 𝑡 = 0.8 cos 30𝜋𝑡 , 𝑡 = 0: 6 𝑠
𝑠3(𝑡) = 0.7 cos 20𝜋𝑡 + sin(𝜋𝑡) , 𝑡 = 6: 10.2 𝑠
𝑠4(𝑡) = 0.4 cos 66𝜋𝑡 + sin(4𝜋𝑡) , 𝑡 = 4: 7.8 𝑠
𝑓𝑠1 (𝑡) = 5
𝑓𝑠2 (𝑡) = 15
𝑓𝑠3 𝑡 = 10 + cos 𝜋𝑡 /2
𝑓𝑠4 𝑡 = 33 + 2 ∗ cos 4𝜋𝑡
𝑓 𝑡 =
𝑑𝜃(𝑡)
2𝜋 𝑑𝑡
0 2 4 6 8 10
Signal
Component 4
Component 3
Component 2
Component 1
Synthetic 1
Time [s]
Synthetic Example 1: STFT vs SST
Noiseless synthetic signal 𝑠 𝑡 as the sum of the
following components:
𝑓𝑠1 (𝑡) = 5
𝑓𝑠2 (𝑡) = 15
𝑓𝑠3 𝑡 = 10 + cos 𝜋𝑡 /2
𝑓𝑠4 𝑡 = 33 + 2 ∗ cos 4𝜋𝑡
𝑓 𝑡 =
𝑑𝜃(𝑡)
2𝜋 𝑑𝑡
𝑠1 𝑡 = 0.5 cos 10𝜋𝑡 , 𝑡 = 0: 6 𝑠
𝑠2 𝑡 = 0.8 cos 30𝜋𝑡 , 𝑡 = 0: 6 𝑠
𝑠3(𝑡) = 0.7 cos 20𝜋𝑡 + sin(𝜋𝑡) , 𝑡 = 6: 10.2 𝑠
𝑠4(𝑡) = 0.4 cos 66𝜋𝑡 + sin(4𝜋𝑡) , 𝑡 = 4: 7.8 𝑠
Synthetic Example 2 - SST
The challenging synthetic signal:
- 20 Hz cosine wave, superposed 100 Hz Morlet atom at 0.3 s
- two 30 Hz zero phase Ricker wavelets at 1.07 s and 1.1 s,
- three different frequency components between 1.3 s and 1.7 s of respectively 7, 30 and 40
Hz.
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time (s)
Amplitude
Synthetic Example 2
STFT SST
The challenging synthetic signal:
- 20 Hz cosine wave, superposed 100 Hz Morlet atom at 0.3 s
- two 30 Hz zero phase Ricker wavelets at 1.07 s and 1.1 s,
- three different frequency components between 1.3 s and 1.7 s of respectively 7, 30 and 40 Hz.
Synthetic Example 2 – STFT vs SST
Signal Reconstruction - SST
1 - Difference between the original signal and
the sum of the modes
2- Mean Square Error (MSE)
𝑀𝑆𝐸 =
1
𝑁
|𝑠 𝑡 − 𝑠(𝑡)|2
𝑁−1
𝑛=0
The challenging synthetic signal:
- 20 Hz cosine wave, superposed 100 Hz Morlet atom at 0.3 s
- two 30 Hz zero phase Ricker wavelets at 1.07 s and 1.1 s,
- three different frequency components between 1.3 s and 1.7 s of respectively 7, 30 and 40 Hz.
MSE = 0.0021
Signal Reconstruction - SSTIndividualComponents
0.5 1 1.5 2
-1
0
1
2
Time (s)
Amplitude
Orginal(RED) and SST estimated (BLUE)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
Reconstruction error with SST
Time (s)
Amplitude
-1
0
1
Mode1
SST Modes
-1
0
1
Mode2
-1
0
1
Mode3
-1
0
1
Mode4
-1
0
1
Mode5
-1
0
1
Mode6
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-1
0
1
Mode7
Time (s)
Real Example: TFR. 5 minutes of data
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
-1
0
1
2
x 10
-3
Time [min]
Amplitude[Volts]
Real Example. Rolla Exp. Stage A2
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
x 10
4
Amplitude
Time (s)
s(t)
Real Example. Rolla Exp. Stage A2
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
x 10
4
Amplitude
Time (s)
s(t)
Real Example. Rolla Exp. Stage A2
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-1
0
1
x 10
4 Original trace
Amplitude
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-5000
0
5000
Mode 1
Amplitude
Time (s)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-6000
-4000
-2000
0
2000
4000
Mode 2
Amplitude
Time (s)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-1000
0
1000
Mode 3
Amplitude Time (s)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-500
0
500
Mode 4
Amplitude
Time (s)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-1
0
1
Mode 5Amplitude
Time (s)
More applications of SST: seismic reflection data
Seismic dataset from a sedimentary basin in Canada
Original data. Inline = 110
Time(s)
CMP
50 100 150 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Erosional
surface Channels
Strong reflector
CMP 81- Located at the first channel
More applications of SST: seismic reflection data
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
x 10
4
Time (s)
Amplitude CMP 81
CMP 81- Located at the first chanel
More applications of SST: seismic reflection data
Time slice at 420 ms
SST - 20 Hz
Inline (km)
Crossline(km)
1 2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4
5
SST - 40 Hz
Inline (km)
Crossline(km)
1 2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4
5
SST - 60 Hz
Inline (km)
Crossline(km)
1 2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4
5
Frequency decomposition
More applications of SST: seismic reflection data
Channel
Fault
Original data. Inline = 110
Time(s)
CMP
50 100 150 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Erosional
surface Channels
Strong reflector
Frequency
Frequency
More applications of SST: seismic reflection data
C80 Spectral
Energy
Conclusions
• SST provides good TFR.
– Recommended for post processing and high precision
evaluations.
– Attractive for high-resolution time-frequency analysis of
microseismic signals.
• SST allows signal reconstruction
– SST can extract individual components.
• Applications of Signal Analysis and Reconstruction
– Instrument Noise Reduction,
– Signal Enhancement
– Pattern Recognition
Acknowledgment
Thanks to the sponsors of the
For their financial support.

More Related Content

PPTX
Speech signal time frequency representation
PPTX
A review of time­‐frequency methods
PDF
Short-time homomorphic wavelet estimation
PPTX
Automated seismic-to-well ties?
PDF
Time reversed acoustics - Mathias Fink
PDF
DSP_2018_FOEHU - Lec 02 - Sampling of Continuous Time Signals
PPT
Lecture13
PDF
Slide Handouts with Notes
Speech signal time frequency representation
A review of time­‐frequency methods
Short-time homomorphic wavelet estimation
Automated seismic-to-well ties?
Time reversed acoustics - Mathias Fink
DSP_2018_FOEHU - Lec 02 - Sampling of Continuous Time Signals
Lecture13
Slide Handouts with Notes

What's hot (20)

PPT
Matched filter
PPTX
SAMPLING & RECONSTRUCTION OF DISCRETE TIME SIGNAL
PPTX
Fundamentals of music processing chapter 5 발표자료
PPT
Isi and nyquist criterion
PPTX
Fundamentals of music processing chapter 6 발표자료
PDF
Nyquist criterion for zero ISI
PDF
DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING: Sampling and Reconstruction on MATLAB
PDF
Slightly fishy - Combining NSOM with SEA TADPOLE
PPT
Sampling
PDF
Dsp 2018 foehu - lec 10 - multi-rate digital signal processing
PDF
Lecture 2 sapienza 2017
PDF
DSP_2018_FOEHU - Lec 06 - FIR Filter Design
PPTX
Nyquist criterion for distortion less baseband binary channel
PPTX
Dissertation Slides
PPTX
Digital Communication Unit 1
PDF
DSP_2018_FOEHU - Lec 08 - The Discrete Fourier Transform
PDF
Lecture 1 sapienza 2017
PPT
1 radar signal processing
PPT
10 range and doppler measurements in radar systems
Matched filter
SAMPLING & RECONSTRUCTION OF DISCRETE TIME SIGNAL
Fundamentals of music processing chapter 5 발표자료
Isi and nyquist criterion
Fundamentals of music processing chapter 6 발표자료
Nyquist criterion for zero ISI
DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING: Sampling and Reconstruction on MATLAB
Slightly fishy - Combining NSOM with SEA TADPOLE
Sampling
Dsp 2018 foehu - lec 10 - multi-rate digital signal processing
Lecture 2 sapienza 2017
DSP_2018_FOEHU - Lec 06 - FIR Filter Design
Nyquist criterion for distortion less baseband binary channel
Dissertation Slides
Digital Communication Unit 1
DSP_2018_FOEHU - Lec 08 - The Discrete Fourier Transform
Lecture 1 sapienza 2017
1 radar signal processing
10 range and doppler measurements in radar systems
Ad

Similar to Time-Frequency Representation of Microseismic Signals using the SST (20)

PPTX
Wavelets AND counterlets
PPTX
Spectral analysis methods
PPTX
A seminar on INTRODUCTION TO MULTI-RESOLUTION AND WAVELET TRANSFORM
PDF
Numerical parametric study on interval shift variation in simo sstd technique...
PDF
Packets Wavelets and Stockwell Transform Analysis of Femoral Doppler Ultrasou...
PDF
Analisis de calidad de red y disturbios S-Transdorm
PDF
Implementation of adaptive stft algorithm for lfm signals
PPTX
Wavelet Transform and DSP Applications
PPTX
Dft,fft,windowing
PPT
fft.ppt MATHEMATICS FOR ENGINEERING
PDF
DSP_note_for_lab especially ofr Lab finals
PPTX
EEG Signal processing
PPTX
Presentation in the Franhoufer IIS about my thesis: A wavelet transform based...
PPTX
A wavelet transform based application for seismic waves. Analysis of the perf...
PPTX
Introduction to Time-Frequency Analysis and Wavelets
PDF
Convolution and deconvolution
PPT
Ch15 transforms
PPTX
Wavelets AND counterlets
Spectral analysis methods
A seminar on INTRODUCTION TO MULTI-RESOLUTION AND WAVELET TRANSFORM
Numerical parametric study on interval shift variation in simo sstd technique...
Packets Wavelets and Stockwell Transform Analysis of Femoral Doppler Ultrasou...
Analisis de calidad de red y disturbios S-Transdorm
Implementation of adaptive stft algorithm for lfm signals
Wavelet Transform and DSP Applications
Dft,fft,windowing
fft.ppt MATHEMATICS FOR ENGINEERING
DSP_note_for_lab especially ofr Lab finals
EEG Signal processing
Presentation in the Franhoufer IIS about my thesis: A wavelet transform based...
A wavelet transform based application for seismic waves. Analysis of the perf...
Introduction to Time-Frequency Analysis and Wavelets
Convolution and deconvolution
Ch15 transforms
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
O5-L3 Freight Transport Ops (International) V1.pdf
PDF
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
PDF
Physiotherapy_for_Respiratory_and_Cardiac_Problems WEBBER.pdf
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
PPTX
master seminar digital applications in india
PDF
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
PDF
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
PPTX
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx
PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PPTX
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
PPTX
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
PDF
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
PPTX
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
PDF
FourierSeries-QuestionsWithAnswers(Part-A).pdf
PDF
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
O5-L3 Freight Transport Ops (International) V1.pdf
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
Physiotherapy_for_Respiratory_and_Cardiac_Problems WEBBER.pdf
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
master seminar digital applications in india
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
FourierSeries-QuestionsWithAnswers(Part-A).pdf
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf

Time-Frequency Representation of Microseismic Signals using the SST

  • 1. Time-Frequency Representation of Microseismic Signals using the Synchrosqueezing Transform Roberto H. Herrera, J.B. Tary and M. van der Baan University of Alberta, Canada rhherrer@ualberta.ca
  • 2. New Time-Frequency Tool • Research objective: – Introduce two novel high-resolution approaches for time-frequency analysis. • Better Time & Frequency Representation. • Allow signal reconstruction from individual components. • Possible applications: – Instantaneous frequency and modal reconstruction. – Multimodal signal analysis. – Nonstationary signal analysis. • Main problem – All classical methods show some spectral smearing (STFT, CWT). – EMD allows for high res T-F analysis. – But Empirical means lack of Math background. • Value proposition – Strong tool for spectral decomposition and denoising . One more thing … It allows mode reconstruction.
  • 3. Why are we going to the T-F domain? • Study changes of frequency content of a signal with time. – Useful for: • attenuation measurement (Reine et al., 2009) • direct hydrocarbon detection (Castagna et al., 2003) • stratigraphic mapping (ex. detecting channel structures) (Partyka et al., 1998). • Microseismic events detection (Das and Zoback, 2011) • Extract sub features in seismic signals – reconstruct band‐limited seismic signals from an improved spectrum. – improve signal-to-noise ratio of the attributes (Steeghs and Drijkoningen, 2001). – identify resonance frequencies (microseismicity). (Tary & van der Baan, 2012).
  • 4. The Heisenberg Box FT  Frequency Domain STFT  Spectrogram (Naive TFR) CWT  Scalogram 𝜎𝑡 𝜎𝑓 ≥ 1 4𝜋 Time Domain All of them share the same limitation: The resolution is limited by the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle! There is a trade-off between frequency and time resolutions The more precisely the position is determined, the less precisely the momentum is known in this instant, and vice versa. --Heisenberg, uncertainty paper, 1927 http://www.aip.org/history/heisenberg/p08.htm Hall, M. (2006), first break, 24, 43–47. Gabor Uncertainty Principle
  • 5. • Localization: How well two spikes in time can be separated from each other in the transform domain. (Axial Resolution) • Frequency resolution: How well two spectral components can be separated in the frequency domain. 𝜎𝑡 = ± 5 ms 𝜎𝑓= 1/(4𝜋*5ms)  ± 16 Hz Hall, M. (2006), first break, 24, 43–47. 𝜎𝑡 𝜎𝑓 ≥ 1 4𝜋 The Heisenberg Box
  • 6. Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Choice of analysis window: Narrow window  good time resolution Wide window (narrow band)  good frequency resolution Extreme Cases: (t)  excellent time resolution, no frequency resolution (f) =1  excellent frequency resolution (FT), no time information 0 t (t) 0  1 F(j)      dtett tj )()]([F 1 0    t tj e 1)( F t
  • 7. Constant Q cf Q B  f0 2f0 4f0 8f0 B 2B 4B 8B B B B B BB f0 2f0 3f0 4f0 5f0 6f0 STFTCWT
  • 8. Time-frequency representations • Non-parametric methods • From the time domain to the frequency domain • Short-Time Fourier Transform - STFT • S-Transform - ST • Continuous Wavelet Transform – CWT • Synchrosqueezing transform – SST • Parametric methods • Time-series modeling (linear prediction filters) • Short-Time Autoregressive method - STAR • Time-varying Autoregressive method - KS (Kalman Smoother)
  • 9. The Synchrosqueezing Transform (SST) - CWT (Daubechies, 1992) *1 ( , ) ( ) ( )sW a b s t a d a t t b     Ingrid Daubechies Instantaneous frequency is the time derivative of the instantaneous phase 𝜔 𝑡 = 𝑑𝜃(𝑡) 𝑑𝑡 (Taner et al., 1979) - SST (Daubechies, 2011) the instantaneous frequency 𝜔𝑠(𝑎, 𝑏) can be computed as the derivative of the wavelet transform at any point (𝑎, 𝑏) . ( , ) ( , ) ( , ) s s s W a bj a b W a b b     Last step: map the information from the time-scale plane to the time-frequency plane. (𝑏, 𝑎) → (𝑏, 𝜔𝑠(𝑎, 𝑏)), this operation is called “synchrosqueezing”
  • 10. SST – Steps Synchrosqueezing depends on the continuous wavelet transform and reassignment Seismic signal 𝑠(𝑡) Mother wavelet 𝜓(𝑡)  𝑓, Δ𝑓 CWT 𝑊𝑠(𝑎, 𝑏) IF 𝑤𝑠 𝑎, 𝑏 Reassignment step: Compute Synchrosqueezed function 𝑇𝑠 𝑓, 𝑏 Extract dominant curves from 𝑇𝑠 𝑓, 𝑏 Time-Frequency Representation Reconstruct signal as a sum of modes Reassignment procedure: Placing the original wavelet coefficient 𝑊𝑠(𝑎, 𝑏) to the new location 𝑊𝑠(𝑤𝑠 𝑎, 𝑏 , 𝑏)  𝑇𝑠 𝑓, 𝑏 Auger, F., & Flandrin, P. (1995). Dorney, T., et al (2000).
  • 12. Synthetic Example 1 Noiseless synthetic signal 𝑠 𝑡 as the sum of the following components: 𝑠1 𝑡 = 0.5 cos 10𝜋𝑡 , 𝑡 = 0: 6 𝑠 𝑠2 𝑡 = 0.8 cos 30𝜋𝑡 , 𝑡 = 0: 6 𝑠 𝑠3(𝑡) = 0.7 cos 20𝜋𝑡 + sin(𝜋𝑡) , 𝑡 = 6: 10.2 𝑠 𝑠4(𝑡) = 0.4 cos 66𝜋𝑡 + sin(4𝜋𝑡) , 𝑡 = 4: 7.8 𝑠 𝑓𝑠1 (𝑡) = 5 𝑓𝑠2 (𝑡) = 15 𝑓𝑠3 𝑡 = 10 + cos 𝜋𝑡 /2 𝑓𝑠4 𝑡 = 33 + 2 ∗ cos 4𝜋𝑡 𝑓 𝑡 = 𝑑𝜃(𝑡) 2𝜋 𝑑𝑡 0 2 4 6 8 10 Signal Component 4 Component 3 Component 2 Component 1 Synthetic 1 Time [s]
  • 13. Synthetic Example 1: STFT vs SST Noiseless synthetic signal 𝑠 𝑡 as the sum of the following components: 𝑓𝑠1 (𝑡) = 5 𝑓𝑠2 (𝑡) = 15 𝑓𝑠3 𝑡 = 10 + cos 𝜋𝑡 /2 𝑓𝑠4 𝑡 = 33 + 2 ∗ cos 4𝜋𝑡 𝑓 𝑡 = 𝑑𝜃(𝑡) 2𝜋 𝑑𝑡 𝑠1 𝑡 = 0.5 cos 10𝜋𝑡 , 𝑡 = 0: 6 𝑠 𝑠2 𝑡 = 0.8 cos 30𝜋𝑡 , 𝑡 = 0: 6 𝑠 𝑠3(𝑡) = 0.7 cos 20𝜋𝑡 + sin(𝜋𝑡) , 𝑡 = 6: 10.2 𝑠 𝑠4(𝑡) = 0.4 cos 66𝜋𝑡 + sin(4𝜋𝑡) , 𝑡 = 4: 7.8 𝑠
  • 14. Synthetic Example 2 - SST The challenging synthetic signal: - 20 Hz cosine wave, superposed 100 Hz Morlet atom at 0.3 s - two 30 Hz zero phase Ricker wavelets at 1.07 s and 1.1 s, - three different frequency components between 1.3 s and 1.7 s of respectively 7, 30 and 40 Hz. 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Time (s) Amplitude Synthetic Example 2
  • 15. STFT SST The challenging synthetic signal: - 20 Hz cosine wave, superposed 100 Hz Morlet atom at 0.3 s - two 30 Hz zero phase Ricker wavelets at 1.07 s and 1.1 s, - three different frequency components between 1.3 s and 1.7 s of respectively 7, 30 and 40 Hz. Synthetic Example 2 – STFT vs SST
  • 16. Signal Reconstruction - SST 1 - Difference between the original signal and the sum of the modes 2- Mean Square Error (MSE) 𝑀𝑆𝐸 = 1 𝑁 |𝑠 𝑡 − 𝑠(𝑡)|2 𝑁−1 𝑛=0
  • 17. The challenging synthetic signal: - 20 Hz cosine wave, superposed 100 Hz Morlet atom at 0.3 s - two 30 Hz zero phase Ricker wavelets at 1.07 s and 1.1 s, - three different frequency components between 1.3 s and 1.7 s of respectively 7, 30 and 40 Hz. MSE = 0.0021 Signal Reconstruction - SSTIndividualComponents 0.5 1 1.5 2 -1 0 1 2 Time (s) Amplitude Orginal(RED) and SST estimated (BLUE) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 Reconstruction error with SST Time (s) Amplitude -1 0 1 Mode1 SST Modes -1 0 1 Mode2 -1 0 1 Mode3 -1 0 1 Mode4 -1 0 1 Mode5 -1 0 1 Mode6 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 -1 0 1 Mode7 Time (s)
  • 18. Real Example: TFR. 5 minutes of data 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 -1 0 1 2 x 10 -3 Time [min] Amplitude[Volts]
  • 19. Real Example. Rolla Exp. Stage A2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 x 10 4 Amplitude Time (s) s(t)
  • 20. Real Example. Rolla Exp. Stage A2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 x 10 4 Amplitude Time (s) s(t)
  • 21. Real Example. Rolla Exp. Stage A2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -1 0 1 x 10 4 Original trace Amplitude 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -5000 0 5000 Mode 1 Amplitude Time (s) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -6000 -4000 -2000 0 2000 4000 Mode 2 Amplitude Time (s) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -1000 0 1000 Mode 3 Amplitude Time (s) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -500 0 500 Mode 4 Amplitude Time (s) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -1 0 1 Mode 5Amplitude Time (s)
  • 22. More applications of SST: seismic reflection data Seismic dataset from a sedimentary basin in Canada Original data. Inline = 110 Time(s) CMP 50 100 150 200 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 Erosional surface Channels Strong reflector
  • 23. CMP 81- Located at the first channel More applications of SST: seismic reflection data 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 x 10 4 Time (s) Amplitude CMP 81
  • 24. CMP 81- Located at the first chanel More applications of SST: seismic reflection data
  • 25. Time slice at 420 ms SST - 20 Hz Inline (km) Crossline(km) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 SST - 40 Hz Inline (km) Crossline(km) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 SST - 60 Hz Inline (km) Crossline(km) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Frequency decomposition More applications of SST: seismic reflection data Channel Fault
  • 26. Original data. Inline = 110 Time(s) CMP 50 100 150 200 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 Erosional surface Channels Strong reflector Frequency Frequency More applications of SST: seismic reflection data C80 Spectral Energy
  • 27. Conclusions • SST provides good TFR. – Recommended for post processing and high precision evaluations. – Attractive for high-resolution time-frequency analysis of microseismic signals. • SST allows signal reconstruction – SST can extract individual components. • Applications of Signal Analysis and Reconstruction – Instrument Noise Reduction, – Signal Enhancement – Pattern Recognition
  • 28. Acknowledgment Thanks to the sponsors of the For their financial support.