3. Interview method
⦿ The interview method of collecting data involves
presentation of oral-verbal stimuli and reply in
terms of oral-verbal responses. This method can
be used through personal interviews and, if
possible, through telephone interviews.
⦿ A method of data collection that involves
researchers asking respondents basically open
ended questions of respondents.
⦿ Interviews are capable of generating both
standardized quantifiable data, and more
in-depth qualitative data
3
5. Personal interviews
Personal interview method requires a person
known as the interviewer asking questions
generally in a face-to-face contact to the other
person or persons. This sort of interview may be
in the form of direct personal investigation or it
may be indirect oral investigation. In the case of
direct personal investigation the interviewer has
to collect the information personally from the
sources concerned. He has to be on the spot
and has to meet people from whom data have to
be collected. This method is particularly suitable
for intensive investigations.
6. ⦿ But in certain cases it may not be possible or
worthwhile to contact directly the persons
concerned or on account of the extensive
scope of enquiry, the direct personal
investigation technique may not be used. In
such cases an indirect oral examination can
be conducted under which the interviewer
has to cross-examine other persons who are
supposed to have knowledge about the
problem under investigation and the
information, obtained is recorded. Most of
the commissions and committees appointed
by government to carry on investigations
make use of this method.
7. Merits of personal interview
method
(i) More information and that too in greater depth can be
obtained.
(ii) Interviewer by his own skill can overcome the
resistance, if any, of the respondents; the interview
method can be made to yield an almost perfect sample
of the general population.
(iii) There is greater flexibility under this method as the
opportunity to restructure questions is always there,
specially in case of unstructured interviews.
(iv) Observation method can as well be applied to
recording verbal answers to various questions.
(v)Personal information can as well be obtained easily
under this method.
8. (vi) Samples can be controlled more effectively as
there arises no difficulty of the missing returns;
non-response generally remains very low.
(vii) The interviewer can usually control which
person(s) will answer the questions. This is not
possible in mailed questionnaire approach. If so
desired, group discussions may also be held.
(ix) The language of the interview can be adopted
to the ability or educational level of the person
interviewed and as such misinterpretations
concerning questions can be avoided.
(x)The interviewer can collect supplementary
information about the respondent’s personal
characteristics and environment which is often of
great value in interpreting results.
9. Demerits of personal interview
method
(i) It is a very expensive method, specially when large and
widely spread geographical sample is taken.
(ii) There remains the possibility of the bias of interviewer
as well as that of the respondent; there also remains the
headache of supervision and control of interviewers.
(iii) Certain types of respondents such as important officials
or executives or people in high income groups may not
be easily approachable under this method and to that
extent the data may prove inadequate.
(iv) This method is relatively more-time-consuming,
specially when the sample is large and re- calls upon
the respondents are necessary.
10. (v)The presence of the interviewer on the spot may
over-stimulate the respondent, sometimes even to the
extent that he may give imaginary information just to
make the interview interesting.
(vi) Under the interview method the organization
required for selecting, training and supervising the
field-staff is more complex with formidable
problems.
(vii) Interviewing at times may also introduce
systematic errors.
(viii) Effective interview presupposes proper rapport
with respondents that would facilitate free and frank
responses. This is often a very difficult requirement.
11. Telephone interviews
This method of collecting information consists in
contacting respondents on telephone itself. It is not a
very widely used method, but plays important part in
industrial surveys, particularly in developed regions. The
chief merits of such a system are:
1.It is more flexible in comparison to mailing method.
2.It is faster than other methods i.e., a quick way of
obtaining information.
3.It is cheaper than personal interviewing method; here the
cost per response is relatively low.
4.Recall is easy; callbacks are simple and economical.
5.There is a higher rate of response than what we have in
mailing method; the non-response is generally very low.
12. 6.Replies can be recorded without causing
embarrassment to respondents and wider distribution
of sample is possible.
7. Interviewer can explain requirements more easily.
8. At times, access can be gained to respondents who
otherwise cannot be contacted for one reason or the
other.
9. No field staff is required.
10. Representative and wider distribution of sample is
possible.
13. Demerits of telephonic interview
method
1. Little time is given to respondents for considered
answers; interview period is not likely to exceed five
minutes in most cases.
2. Surveys are restricted to respondents who have
telephone facilities.
3. Extensive geographical coverage may get restricted by
cost considerations.
4. It is not suitable for intensive surveys where
comprehensive answers are required to various
questions.
5. Possibility of the bias of the interviewer is relatively
more.
6. Questions have to be short and to the point; probes are
difficult to handle.
14. Interview Types
⦿ Interviews can range from fixed to free:
› Structured: Uses pre-established questions, asked
in a predetermined order, using a standard mode of
delivery
› Semi-structured: As the name suggests, these
interviews are neither fully fixed nor fully free, and are
perhaps best seen as flexible
› Unstructured: Attempts to draw out information,
attitudes, opinions, and beliefs around particular
themes, ideas, and issues without the aid of
predetermined questions
14
15. Unstructured interviews do not follow a system of pre-determined
questions and standardized techniques of recording information. In
a non-structured interview, the interviewer is allowed much greater
freedom to ask, in case of need, supplementary questions or at
times he may omit certain questions if the situation so requires. He
may even change the sequence of questions. He has relatively
greater freedom while recording the responses to include some
aspects and exclude others. But this sort of flexibility results in lack
of comparability of one interview with another and the analysis of
unstructured responses becomes much more difficult and
time-consuming than that of the structured responses obtained in
case of structured interviews. Unstructured interviews also demand
deep knowledge and greater skill on the part of the interviewer.
Unstructured interview, however, happens to be the central
technique of collecting information in case of exploratory or
formulative research studies. But in case of descriptive studies, we
quite often use the technique of structured interview because of its
being more economical, providing a safe basis for generalization
and requiring relatively lesser skill on the part of the interviewer.
16. Interview Types
⦿ Interviews also vary in their level of formality:
› Formal: A formal interview is just that, formal.
Perhaps the best analogy is the classic job interview
that includes: the office setting; the formal
handshake; appropriate attire; order and structure;
and best professional behavior.
› Informal: An informal interview attempts to ignore
the rules and roles associated with interviewing in an
attempt to establish rapport, gain trust, and create a
more natural environment conducive to open and
honest communication.
16
17. Interview Types
⦿ Interviewing can be done one on one, or in groups:
› One on one: Most interviews are an interaction
between the interviewer and a single interviewee. It is
thought that ‘one on one’ allows the researcher
control over the process and the interviewee the
freedom to express their thoughts
› Group: Group interviews involve interviewing more
than one person at a time. This can be done in a
formal structured way, or may involve a less
structured process where the researcher acts more
as a moderator or facilitator than an interviewer
17
18. Conducting an Interview
⦿ Conducting an interview that can generate relevant and
credible data requires:
› thorough planning
› considered preparation of an interview schedule and
recording system
› sufficient piloting
› reflexive modification
› the actual interview
› and appropriate analysis
18
19. Conducting the Interview
Two important considerations in interviewing are:
⦿ Presentation of self
⦿ Preliminaries
› Be on time!
› Set up and check equipment
› Establish rapport
› Introduce the study
› Explain ethics
19
20. The Questioning Process
Listen more than talk
The main game in interviewing is to facilitate an
interviewee’s ability to answer. This involves:
› easing respondents into the interview
› asking strategic questions
› prompting and probing appropriately
› keeping it moving
› being true to your role
› winding it down when the time is right
20
21. Recording Responses
Recording responses can be done in a number of ways;
you may need to trial a couple of recording methods in
order to assess what is best for you.
› Note taking - this can range from highly structured to
open and interpretive.
› Audio recording - audio recording allows you to
preserve raw data for review at a later date.
› Video taping - video taping offers the added bonus of
being able to record visual cues, but is more intrusive;
is prone to more technical difficulties; and can generate
data that is hard to analyse.
21
22. Observation method of data collection
⦿ Observation: A systematic method of data
collection that relies on a researcher’s ability
to gather data through their senses
⦿ Observe: To notice using a full range of
appropriate senses. To see, hear, feel, taste,
and smell
22
23. ⦿ The observation method is the most commonly used
method specially in studies relating to behavioral
sciences. In a way we all observe things around us, but
this sort of observation is not scientific observation.
Observation becomes a scientific tool and the method of
data collection for the researcher, when it serves a
formulated research purpose, is systematically planned
and recorded and is subjected to checks and controls
on validity and reliability. Under the observation method,
the information is sought by way of investigator’s own
direct observation without asking from the respondent.
24. ⦿ Observation provides the opportunity for
researchers to document actual behavior
rather than responses related to behavior
⦿ However, the observed can act differently
when surveilled; and researchers’
observations are likely to be biased by their
own worldviews
24
25. Types of Observation
⦿ In conducting observations, researchers can be
anything from removed to immersed:
› Non-participant: In this role, the researcher
does not become, nor aims to become an
integral part of the system or community they
are observing
› Participant: In this role, the researcher is, or
becomes, a part of the team, community, or
cultural group they are observing
25
26. Types of Observation
› Structured: Highly systematic and often rely on
predetermined criteria related to the people, events,
practices, issues, behaviours, actions, situations, and
phenomena being observed.
› Semi-structured: Observers generally use some
manner of observation schedule or checklist to
organize observations, but also attempt to observe
and record the unplanned and/or the unexpected.
› Unstructured: Observers attempt to observe and
record data without predetermined criteria.
26
27. Advantages
⦿ Subjective bias is eliminated, if observation is done
accurately.
⦿ Information obtained under this method relates to what
is currently happening; it is not complicated by either the
past behavior or future intentions or attitudes.
⦿ This method is independent of respondents willingness
to respond and as such is relatively less demanding of
active cooperation on the part of respondents as
happens to be the case in the interview or the
questionnaire method. This method is particularly
suitable in studies which deal with subjects (i.e.,
respondents) who are not capable of giving verbal
reports of their feelings for one reason or the other
28. Limitations
⦿ Firstly, it is an expensive method.
⦿ Secondly, the information provided by this
method is very limited.
⦿ Thirdly, sometimes unforeseen factors may
interfere with the observational task. At
times, the fact that some people are rarely
accessible to direct observation creates
obstacle for this method to collect data
effectively.
29. What is a
Questionnaire?
A set of Questions
designed to generate
the statistical
information from a
specific demographic
needed to accomplish
the research
objectives.
30. ▪ Ensures standardization and comparability of the data
across interviews – everyone is asked the same
questions
▪ Increases speed and accuracy of recording
▪ Facilitates data processing
▪ Allows the researcher to collect the relevant information
necessary to address the management decision problem
Purposes of the Questionnaire
31. 1. Content - What should be asked?
2. Wording - How should each question be phrased?
3. Sequence - In what order should the questions
be presented?
4. Layout - What layout will best serve the research
objectives?
The Major Decisions in Questionnaire
Design
The most difficult step is specifying exactly
what information is to be collected from each
respondent
32. 1. General form & content
⦿ So far as the general form of a questionnaire is
concerned, it can either be structured or unstructured
questionnaire. Structured questionnaires are those
questionnaires in which there are definite, concrete and
pre-determined questions. The questions are presented
with exactly the same wording and in the same order to
all respondents.
⦿ Resort is taken to this sort of standardization to ensure
that all respondents reply to the same set of questions.
The form of the question may be either closed (i.e., of
the type ‘yes’ or ‘no’) or open (i.e., inviting free
response) but should be stated in advance and not
constructed during questioning.
33. 1. General form & content
⦿ Thus a highly structured questionnaire is one in
which all questions and answers are specified and
comments in the respondent’s own words are held to
the minimum. When these characteristics are not
present in a questionnaire, it can be termed as
unstructured or non-structured questionnaire. More
specifically, we can say that in an unstructured
questionnaire, the interviewer is provided with a
general guide on the type of information to be
obtained, but the exact question formulation is
largely his own responsibility and the replies are to
be taken down in the respondent’s own words to the
extent possible.
34. 2. Question sequence
⦿ A proper sequence of questions reduces considerably the
chances of individual questions being misunderstood. The
question-sequence must be clear and smoothly-moving,
meaning thereby that the relation of one question to another
should be readily apparent to the respondent, with questions
that are easiest to answer being put in the beginning. The first
few questions are particularly important because they are
likely to influence the attitude of the respondent and in seeking
his desired cooperation. The opening questions should be
such as to arouse human interest. The following type of
questions should generally be avoided as opening questions
in a questionnaire:
⦿ Questions that put too great a strain on the memory or intellect
of the respondent;
⦿ Questions of a personal character;
⦿ Questions related to personal wealth, etc.
35. ⦿ Relatively difficult questions must be
relegated towards the end so that even if the
respondent decides not to answer such
questions, considerable information would
have already been obtained. Thus,
question-sequence should usually go from
the general to the more specific and the
researcher must always remember that the
answer to a given question is a function not
only of the question itself, but of all previous
questions as well.
36. 3. Question formulation and wording
With regard to this aspect of questionnaire, the researcher
should note that each question must be very clear for any sort
of misunderstanding can do irreparable harm to a survey.
Question should also be impartial in order not to give a biased
picture of the true state of affairs. Questions should be
constructed with a view to their forming a logical part of a well
thought out tabulation plan. In general, all questions should
meet the following standards—
(a) should be easily understood
(b) should be simple i.e., should convey only one thought at a
time
(c) should be concrete and should conform as much as possible
to the respondent’s way of thinking.
37. 1. Are the questions relevant. Do they pertain to the
research problem
2. Are the questions accurate. Do they accurately
depict the attitudes, behaviors, etc. intended to
investigate
3. Do respondents have the necessary information?
4. Do respondents understand and interpret the
question correctly
5. Will respondents give the information?
4. Layout
38. Open-ended questions
⦿ Open-ended Questions are exploratory in nature.
Respondents provide a response in their own words.
allows for the respondent to provide any answer
they choose without forcing them to select from
concrete options.
⦿ Questions that are open-ended provide rich
qualitative data. In essence, they provide the
researcher with an opportunity to gain insight on all
the opinions on a topic they are not familiar with.
39. Open Ended Questions: key advantages
⦿ They permit an unlimited number of possible
answers.
⦿ Respondents can answer in detail and can qualify
and clarify responses
⦿ Unanticipated findings can be discovered
⦿ They permit adequate answers to complex issues
⦿ They permit creativity, self-expression, and
richness of detail
⦿ They reveal a respondent's logic, thinking process,
and frame of reference
40. Open-ended questions: Key disadvantages
⦿ Different respondents give different degrees of detail in
answers
⦿ Responses may be irrelevant or buried in useless detail
⦿ Comparisons and statistical analysis become difficult
⦿ Coding responses is difficult· articulate and highly
literate respondents have an advantage
⦿ Questions may be too general for respondents who lose
direction
⦿ A greater amount of respondent time, thought, and effort
is necessary
⦿ Answers take up a lot of space in the questionnaire.
41. Closed-ended questions
Such questions do not allow the respondent to
provide unique or unanticipated answers, but
rather, they have to choose from a list of
pre-selected options. Questions that are
closed-ended are conclusive in nature as they
are designed to create data that is easily
quantifiable. The fact that questions of this type
are easy to code makes them particularly useful
when trying to prove the statistical significance
of a survey’s results. Furthermore, the
information gained by closed-ended questions
allows researchers to categorize respondents
into groups based on the options they have
selected.
42. Closed Ended Questions: key advantages
⦿ It is easier and quicker for respondents to answer.
⦿ The answers of different respondents are easier to
compare.
⦿ Answers are easier to code and statistically analyze.
⦿ The response choices can clarify question meaning for
respondents
⦿ Respondents are more likely to answer about sensitive
topics
⦿ There are fewer irrelevant or confused answers to
questions
⦿ Less articulate or less literate respondents are not at a
disadvantage
⦿ Replication is easier
43. Closed Ended Questions: key
disadvantages
⦿ They can suggest ideas that the respondent would not
otherwise have.
⦿ Respondents with no opinion or no knowledge can answer
anyway.
⦿ respondents can be frustrated because their desired answer is
not a choice
⦿ It is confusing if many response choices are offered
⦿ Misinterpretation of a question can go unnoticed
⦿ Distinctions between respondent answers may be blurred
⦿ Clerical mistakes or marking the wrong response is possible
⦿ They force respondents to give simplistic responses to complex
issues
⦿ They force people to make choices they would not make in the
real world
45. Dichotomous Questions
▪ Questions with two options like Yes/No,
Agree/Disagree.
Advantage
It is quick and does not allow ambivalent answers.
Disadvantages
▪ Prone to large amounts of error since polarized
responses prevent gaining information on the range of
variation
▪ Fail to communicate any intensity of feeling
46. Multiple Choice Questions
▪Are all possible alternatives included?
▪Too many alternatives
▪Position Bias
Scaled Response Questions
▪ Closed ended questions where the response choices are designed
to capture an intensity of feeling (Likert, Staple, Semantic
differential)
▪Easy to code and more powerful statistical tools
▪Main problem: Respondent misunderstanding
47. ▪long-worded questions
▪ double-barreled questions. Questions that refer to two or
more issues within the same question. Where respondent
may agree with only 1 part of multipart statement.
▪ Do you think Nike offers better pricing and variety than
other brands
Things to avoid
48. Things to avoid
▪ burdensome questions - that may tax the respondent’s
memory
▪ How many tubes of toothpaste have you purchased in
the last 3 months
▪ Have you purchased toothpaste in the past week
▪Embarrassing, sensitive, or threatening questions:
▪ Have you charged more on your credit card than you
should
▪ Use third person do you think most people…..
49. Merits
⦿ There is low cost even when the universe is large and is
widely spread geographically. It is free from the bias of
the interviewer; answers are in respondents’ own words.
⦿ Respondents have adequate time to give well thought
out answers.
⦿ Respondents, who are not easily approachable, can
also be reached conveniently.
⦿ Large samples can be made use of and thus the results
can be made more dependable and reliable.
50. Demerits
⦿ Low rate of return of the duly filled in questionnaires; bias due to
no-response is often indeterminate.
⦿ It can be used only when respondents are educated and
cooperating.
⦿ The control over questionnaire may be lost once it is sent.
⦿ There is inbuilt inflexibility because of the difficulty of amending the
approach once questionnaires have been dispatched.
⦿ There is also the possibility of ambiguous replies or omission of
replies altogether to certain questions; interpretation of omissions is
difficult.
⦿ It is difficult to know whether willing respondents are truly
representative.
⦿ This method is likely to be the slowest of all.
51. The layout and physical attractiveness of a questionnaire
are important aspects
▪ Questionnaires should be designed to appear as
short as possible
▪ Questionnaires should not appear overcrowded
▪ Leave lots of space for open ended questions
▪ Questionnaires in booklet form are often
recommended
QUESTIONNAIRE LAYOUT
52. OPENING
▪Provide first name (at least)
▪Provide name of company doing research
▪Provide reason for survey and topic
▪State that no selling will be involved and no personal data other
than for statistical purposes
▪Tell respondent approximate time to complete
▪Reinforce that respondent’s time is appreciated
▪Invite to participate
AND CLOSING
▪Thank for time
▪Ask if they had a positive experience and remind them that their
opinions count
53. Schedules
This method of data collection is very much like the collection
of data through questionnaire, with little difference which lies in
the fact that schedules (Performa containing a set of
questions) are being filled in by the enumerators who are
specially appointed for the purpose. These enumerators along
with schedules, go to respondents, put to them the questions
from the performa in the order the questions are listed and
record the replies in the space meant for the same in the
performa. In certain situations schedules may be handed over
to respondents and enumerators may help them in recording
their answers to various questions in the said schedules.
Enumerators explain the aims and objects of the investigation
and also remove the difficulties which any respondent may feel
in understanding the implications of a particular question or the
definition or concept of difficult terms.
54. ⦿ This method requires the selection of enumerators for filling up
schedules or assisting respondents to fill up schedules and as
such enumerators should be very carefully selected. The
enumerators should be trained to perform their job well and the
nature and scope of the investigation should be explained to
them thoroughly so that they may well understand the
implications of different questions put in the schedule.
Enumerators should be intelligent and must possess the
capacity of cross- examination in order to find out the truth.
Above all, they should be honest, sincere, hardworking and
should have patience and perseverance.
⦿ This method of data collection is very useful in extensive
enquiries and can lead to fairly reliable results. It is, however,
very expensive and is usually adopted in investigations
conducted by governmental agencies or by some big
organizations. Population census all over the world is
conducted through this method.
55. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
QUESTIONNAIRES AND SCHEDULES
⦿ 1.The questionnaire is generally sent through mail to
informants to be answered as specified in a covering
letter, but otherwise without further assistance from the
sender. The schedule is generally filled out by the
research worker or the enumerator, who can interpret
questions when necessary.
⦿ 2.To collect data through questionnaire is relatively cheap
and economical since we have to spend money only in
preparing the questionnaire and in mailing the same to
respondents. Here no field staff required. To collect data
through schedules is relatively more expensive since
considerable amount of money has to be spent in
appointing enumerators and in importing training to them.
Money is also spent in preparing schedules.
56. ⦿ 3.Non-response is usually high in case of questionnaire
as many people do not respond and many return the
questionnaire without answering all questions. Bias due
to non-response often remains indeterminate. As
against this, non-response is generally very low in case
of schedules because these are filled by enumerators
who are able to get answers to all questions. But there
remains the danger of interviewer bias and cheating.
⦿ 4. In case of questionnaire, it is not always clear as to
who replies, but in case of schedule the identity of
respondent is known
57. 5.The questionnaire method is likely to be very slow since
many respondents do not return the questionnaire in
time despite several reminders, but in case of schedules
the information is collected well in time as they are filled
in by enumerators.
6. Personal contact is generally not possible in case of the
questionnaire method a questionnaires are sent to
respondents by post who also in turn return the same by
post. But in case of schedules direct personal contact is
established with respondents.
7. Personal contact is generally not possible in case of the
questionnaire method as questionnaires are sent to
respondents by post who also in turn return the same by
post. But in case of schedules direct personal contact is
established with respondents.
58. 8. Questionnaire method can be used only when
respondents are literate and cooperative, but in case of
schedules the information can be gathered even when
the respondents happen to be illiterate.
9. Wider and more representative distribution of sample is
possible under the questionnaire method, but in respect
of schedules there usually remains the difficulty in
sending enumerators over a relatively wider area.
10. Risk of collecting incomplete and wrong information is
relatively more under the questionnaire method,
particularly when people are unable to understand
questions properly. But in case of schedules, the
information collected is generally complete and accurate
as enumerators can remove the difficulties, if any, faced
by respondents in correctly understanding the
questions. As a result, the information collected through
schedules is relatively more accurate than that obtained
through questionnaires
59. 11. The success of questionnaire method lies more on the
quality of the questionnaire itself, but in the case of
schedules much depends upon the honesty and
competence of enumerators.
12. In order to attract the attention of respondents, the
physical appearance of questionnaire must be quite
attractive, but this may not be so in case of schedules
as they are to be filled in by enumerators and not by
respondents.
13. Along with schedules, observation method can also be
used but such a thing is not possible while collecting
data through questionnaires.
60. Other methods of data
collection
⦿ Warranty cards: Warranty cards are usually
postal sized cards which are used by dealers of
consumer durables to collect information
regarding their products. The information sought
is printed in the form of questions on the
‘warranty cards’ which is placed inside the
package along with the product with a request
to the consumer to fill in the card and post it
back to the dealer.
61. ⦿ Distributor or store audits: Distributor or store audits
are performed by distributors as well as manufactures
through their salesmen at regular intervals. Distributors
get the retail stores audited through salesmen and use
such information to estimate market size, market share,
seasonal purchasing pattern and so on. The data are
obtained in such audits not by questioning but by
observation. For instance, in case of a grocery store
audit, a sample of stores is visited periodically and data
are recorded on inventories on hand either by
observation or copying from store records. The principal
advantage of this method is that it offers the most
efficient way of evaluating the effect on sales of
variations of different techniques of in-store promotion.