Davies2008
Download as PPT, PDF0 likes491 views
The National Service Framework for Quality Improvement aims to transform patient care and public health by putting knowledge to work. It provides quality assurance, management, and control for library services through national standards and developmental standards. The framework is aligned with national policy and contains five domains and outcomes to ensure high quality, consistent library services across the country. It will be implemented through self-assessment, peer review, and compliance with essential, core and developmental criteria.
Davies2008
- 1. ‘quality is everything’ Colin Davies & Tricia Ellis UHMLG Spring Forum 10th March 2008 National Service Framework for Quality Improvement
- 2. What is the aim of the National Service Framework for Quality Improvement? • The underpinning aim is to put knowledge to work, to transform patient care and public health. This will be achieved by a quality led review of current service provision, followed by the redesign and development of library services to form a modern library/knowledge service. • To ensure that NHS library/knowledge services maintain and continuously control their ‘service offer’ requires a robust quality improvement programme. • The National Service Framework for Quality Improvement is the mechanism for quality assurance, quality management and quality control for all library services.
- 4. Quality Improvement The National Service Framework for Quality Improvement provides: 1. A quality assurance tool for health library/knowledge services 2. An infrastructure through which to deliver the outcomes defined in the Framework. 3. National standards, which define the core services on offer 4. Developmental standards to ensure the provision of a quality service which is delivered consistently to a uniformly high standard across the country.
- 5. Quality Assurance The Framework is aligned to national policy and aims to complement other quality initiatives The criteria statements are referenced to legislation, statutory guidance, Department of Health guidance and other required assessments. The references will help library/knowledge service staff to understand where the statements have come from. The key assessment frameworks referenced include: – ISO 9001:2000 International standard for quality management systems – Improving Working Lives Accreditation – Standards for Better Health – NHS Litigation Authority
- 6. The National Service Framework for Quality Improvement • Provides the systematic quality improvement of library services, ensuring alignment of the library to the needs of their parent organisation and expectations of their customer. • Describes the quality outcomes required for library services, whilst the standards quality assure and performance monitor the framework.
- 7. The Framework Outcomes Outcome 1.1 (Managing Service) Outcome 1.2 (Managing Knowledge) Outcome 1.3 (Service Infrastructure) Outcome 2 (Access) Outcome 2.1 (Information Literacy) Outcome 3 (Library/Knowledge Service Staffing)
- 8. Access to knowledge Information Literacy worldclasscommissioning Management of service & knowledge Infrastructure Skilled and motivated staff
- 9. The Creation of the National Service Framework for Quality Improvement • 2006 - The creation of the National Service Framework for NHS Funded Library Services in England. • 2007 – The creation of a quality assurance tool and a set of standards supported by Health Accreditation Quality Unit • Five organisations have piloted the tool and Standards • The SHA leads and NLH Board have agreed that compliance to standards will be a national key performance indicator. • During 2008, workshops will take place to support library managers preparing for assessment and formal training of surveyors will commence. • Visits will begin in early Spring 2009 by peer review teams to assess compliance to the Standards.
- 10. The Standards Domain 1 Managing Services, Knowledge, Risk and Information Governance – Domain 1.1 Strategy – Domain 1.2 Policy – Domain 1.3 Operational Management – Domain 1.4 Performance Monitoring – Domain 1.5 Corporate Risk – Domain 1.6 Information Governance include 5 Domains:
- 11. Domain 2 Domain 2 Commissioning, Finance, Contracts and Partners – Domain 2.1 Commissioning – Domain 2.2 Finance and Budgets – Domain 2.3 Service Level Agreements and Contracts – Domain 2.3 Partnership Working
- 12. Domain 3 Domain 3 Human Resources and Staff Management – Domain 3.1 HR Strategy – Domain 3.2 Staff Structure – Domain 3.3 HR Policies – Domain 3.4 Recruitment – Domain 3.5 Orientation and induction – Domain 3.6 Job Descriptions – Domain 3.7 European Working Directive – Domain 3.8 Skill Mix – Domain 3.9 Appraisal – Domain 3.10 Training and Development – Domain 3.11 Staff Communication – Domain 3.12 Staff Involvement
- 13. Domain 4 Domain 4 Infrastructure, Facilities and Safety – Domain 4.1 Information Technology – Domain 4.2 Facilities and Equipment Management – Domain 4.3 Environmental Management – Domain 4.4 Work Space – Domain 4.5 Health and Safety
- 14. Domain 5 Domain 5 Customer Engagement – Domain 5.1 Access – Domain 5.2 Customer Induction – Domain 5.3 Customer Education – Domain 5.4 Customer Service – Domain 5.5 Customer Facilities
- 15. Weighting of the criteria To assist with prioritisation of the work, each criterion is weighted according to the following definitions: E Weighted criteria (Essential) relate to the alignment with National Library for Health strategy and good management practice that are essential and must be met in order to achieve compliance. C Weighted criteria (Core) reflect statutory and professional requirements, guidance, strategies and reports issued by the government, Department of Health and professional bodies and sound organisational practice in health care. D Weighted criteria (Developmental) relate to enhanced practice that some trusts may already offer and others should be aiming to achieve given sufficient resources and a strong commitment to quality. Over time developmental criteria will become core.
- 16. The Criteria Definition of criteria Designed to be measurable through self-assessment and survey processes. Flexible and adaptable, applicable irrespective of the size and composition of each library/knowledge service. The criteria set out what needs to be achieved, implemented according to local circumstances, with staff teams within the local knowledge services decide and manage how this is to be done. Type of criteria Corporate criteria reflect the requirements of the parent organisation (this may be a PCT, SHA, Trust or other healthcare provider.) Service criteria reflect the requirement at library/knowledge service level
- 17. Categories of compliance Full Compliance: – The criterion is in place – There is evidence to prove this – There is written, observable, established practice – All staff are aware Partial Compliance: – The criterion is not fully met – It is being worked on (but not draft documents) – There is evidence to show it is being actively addressed – resources identified, plans in place
- 18. Categories of compliance Non Compliance: – This has not been considered – No work towards implementation – May be a willingness to progress but no supporting action or plans to move forward – What is observed falls far short of the guidance – Draft documents – Unsafe systems of practice Not applicable: – Individual standards or criteria that do not apply to the knowledge service. – These need to be agreed with the lead surveyor and documented as to why they are not applicable.
- 19. Corporate and Service Criteria The ability of library/knowledge service to be high quality, timely, appropriate and safe, and provide value for money requires commitment from the organisation to ensure policies and processes are in place to enable this to happen. Also the organisation needs to be able to demonstrate the library/knowledge service is part of the corporate body with regards to strategy, policy and legislative requirements.
- 20. Example - 1.5 Corporate Risk Criterion 1.5a There is a dated, documented risk management strategy for the NHS funded library/knowledge services which is reviewed on an annual basis. Guidance The strategy details aims, objectives, committee structures and accountabilities and individual responsibilities, and covers all types of risk including environmental and organisational (finance, human resources, legal compliance, health and safety). It should include the following elements: the process for reviewing the service’s performance with regard to the management of risk, the identification of how risk is measured, key objectives for managing risk, guidance on what constitutes "acceptable" risk, links between the strategy and risk management policies and procedures and how staff are to be trained in risk management.
- 21. Example – Domain 3.2 Staff Structure Criterion 3.2e A named person is responsible for the co-ordination of local quality improvement/management activities. Guidance: The service quality co-ordinator should also link into organisation- wide quality initiatives and structures, both formally and informally. The responsibilities of this person may include leading on the implementation of the quality assurance/accreditation programme for the service.
- 22. Benefits - 1 • It provides the mechanism for quality assurance, quality management and quality control for all library/knowledge services that support healthcare organisations. • The Framework is generic to any type of knowledge service, whether a library, a resource centre, information unit or an individual in a specialised role. • Providing a standardised approach to quality improvement and service modernisation for library/knowledge services across the whole local healthcare economy including Acute Trusts, Mental Healthcare Trusts, Primary Care Trusts, Primary Health Care Teams, Voluntary Agencies, Hospices, Independent Providers and virtual library/knowledge services providers.
- 23. Benefits - 2 • Opportunities to align with organisational core business and to raise profile of the Library/Knowledge Service • Staffing opportunities to extend competencies in project management, surveying and assessing quality provision in peer review visits. • The provision of a clear action plan for service improvement will become evident through self assessment and peer review visits.
- 24. Next steps…. • The press release of the Review of NHS Library Services and the National Service Framework for Quality Improvement. • Circulation of both documents to library/knowledge organisations and networks. • Training for Quality Leads, Project Managers, Surveyors, organisations. • Workshops on standards interpretation • A range of support tools on NLH ‘For Librarians’, e.g. FAQs, guidance, etc. • Throughout 2008 self-assessment of services for compliance to the standards with preparation for peer review visits in 2009. • Planning for the accreditation of exceptional services
- 25. For further information contact colin.davies@institute.nhs.uk tricia.ellis@southwest.nhs.uk