SlideShare a Scribd company logo

Digital 2022 Chile (February 2022) v01

DataReportal, profile picture
DataReportal

The document provides a comprehensive overview of digital adoption and connected behaviors globally, highlighting shifts in social media user figures and internet connections as of February 2022. It emphasizes that data sources and calculations may have changed over time, leading to potential disparities with previous reports, and includes specific data for Chile, including year-on-year changes in population and internet usage. Additionally, it discusses evolving trends in digital culture, such as social media's increasing role in self-directed learning and content creation.

Internet
1 of 88
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Most read
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Most read
29
30
31
32
33
34
Most read
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO THE LATEST CONNECTED BEHAVIOURS DIGITAL 2022 CHILE
Digital 2022 Chile (February 2022) v01
APP ANNIE SIMILARWEB LOCOWISE SKAI GWI STATISTA GSMA INTELLIGENCE SEMRUSH PARTNERS THAT MAKE THE GLOBAL DIGITAL REPORTS SERIES POSSIBLE
DATAREPORTAL.COM/LIBRARY FIND THOUSANDS OF REPORTS EXPLORING DIGITAL TRENDS IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD IN OUR FREE ONLINE LIBRARY:
! The findings published in this report use the latest data available at the time of production. This may include revised figures for historical data points that were not available when we published previous reports in the Global Digital Reports series. From time to time, we may also change the data sources that we use to inform specific data points, and we may also change how we calculate certain values. Similarly, our data partners may change the ways in which they source, calculate, or report the data that they share with us. As a result, findings published in this report may not correlate with findings published in our previous reports, especially where such findings represent change over time (e.g. annual growth). Where we report figures for change over time, such figures will use the latest available data, so we recommend using the values published in this report, rather than trying to recalculate such values using data from previous reports. Wherever we’re aware of the potential for historical mismatches, we’ve included a note on comparability in the footnotes of each relevant slide. Please read these advisories carefully to understand how data sources or calculations have changed since previous reports, and beware of making any comparisons with historical data. In addition to changes in data sources and calculations, please note that social media user numbers may not represent unique individuals. This is because some people may manage multiple social media accounts, and because some social media accounts may represent β€˜non-human’ entities (e.g. businesses, animals, bands, etc.). As a result, the figures we publish for social media users may exceed the figures we publish for total population or for internet users. This may seem counter-intuitive, but such differences do not represent mistakes. For more information, please read our notes on data variance, mismatches, and curiosities: https://datareportal.com/notes-on-data. IMPORTANT NOTES ON COMPARING DATA
GLOBAL HEADLINES
7 7.91 8.28 4.95 4.62 BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION +1.0% +2.9% +4.0% +10.1% 57.0% 104.6% 62.5% 58.4% TOTAL POPULATION MOBILE CONNECTIONS INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE URBANISATION TOTAL vs. POPULATION TOTAL vs. POPULATION TOTAL vs. POPULATION SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; GOVERNMENT BODIES; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; ITU; GWI; EUROSTAT; CNNIC; APJII; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND EARNINGS REPORTS; OCDH; TECHRASA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. GLOBAL OVERVIEW GLOBAL OVERVIEW OVERVIEW OF THE ADOPTION AND USE OF CONNECTED DEVICES AND SERVICES AT A WORLDWIDE LEVEL GLOBAL DIGITAL HEADLINES FEB 2022
8 OCEANIA SOUTH-EASTERN ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA EASTERN ASIA CENTRAL ASIA WESTERN ASIA SOUTHERN AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA EASTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE NORTHERN EUROPE WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN AMERICA CARIBBEAN CENTRAL AMERICA NORTHERN AMERICA 73% 72% 73% 46% 66% 66% 26% 24% 42% 63% 86% 87% 98% 94% 75% 66% 70% 92% 72% SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; UNITED NATIONS. NOTE: REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. GLOBAL OVERVIEW INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET ADOPTION FEB 2022
9 OCEANIA SOUTH-EASTERN ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA EASTERN ASIA CENTRAL ASIA WESTERN ASIA SOUTHERN AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA EASTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE NORTHERN EUROPE WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN AMERICA CARIBBEAN CENTRAL AMERICA NORTHERN AMERICA 0.6% 9.8% 24.7% 18.1% 1.0% 0.9% 2.5% 0.9% 3.6% 3.2% 5.1% 2.7% 2.1% 3.7% 6.6% 0.6% 2.6% 7.0% 4.2% SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. NOTES: FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. GLOBAL OVERVIEW INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL GLOBAL INTERNET USERS SHARE OF GLOBAL INTERNET USERS FEB 2022
10 OCEANIA SOUTH-EASTERN ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA EASTERN ASIA CENTRAL ASIA WESTERN ASIA SOUTHERN AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA EASTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE NORTHERN EUROPE WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN AMERICA CARIBBEAN CENTRAL AMERICA NORTHERN AMERICA 66% 72% 69% 34% 33% 70% 45% 10% 8% 16% 56% 70% 76% 85% 84% 79% 55% 73% 82% SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS; CNNIC; TECHRASA; OCDH. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. NOTES: DOES NOT INCLUDE DATA FOR SUDAN OR SYRIA. REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE, BASE, AND METHODOLOGY CHANGES, INCLUDING SIGNIFICANT SOURCE DATA REVISIONS AND CHANGES IN REPORTING APPROACHES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH THOSE PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS. FIGURES FOR LOCAL AND REGIONAL SOCIAL MEDIA USE RELY ON DIFFERENT DATASETS TO GLOBAL FIGURES. GLOBAL OVERVIEW ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION (NOTE: USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) SOCIAL MEDIA USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION FEB 2022
11 OCEANIA SOUTH-EASTERN ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA EASTERN ASIA CENTRAL ASIA WESTERN ASIA SOUTHERN AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA EASTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE NORTHERN EUROPE WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN AMERICA CARIBBEAN CENTRAL AMERICA NORTHERN AMERICA 0.7% 11.6% 27.6% 15.7% 0.6% 4.5% 0.7% 1.1% 0.3% 1.6% 2.8% 4.9% 2.8% 2.1% 3.9% 8.2% 0.6% 3.2% 7.2% SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS; CNNIC; TECHRASA; OCDH. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. NOTES: FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. DOES NOT INCLUDE DATA FOR SUDAN OR SYRIA. REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE, BASE, AND METHODOLOGY CHANGES, INCLUDING SIGNIFICANT SOURCE DATA REVISIONS AND CHANGES IN REPORTING APPROACHES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH THOSE PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS. FIGURES FOR LOCAL AND REGIONAL SOCIAL MEDIA USE RELY ON DIFFERENT DATASETS TO GLOBAL FIGURES. GLOBAL OVERVIEW ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS IN EACH REGION AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL GLOBAL ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS SHARE OF GLOBAL SOCIAL MEDIA USERS FEB 2022
12 OCEANIA SOUTH-EASTERN ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA EASTERN ASIA CENTRAL ASIA WESTERN ASIA SOUTHERN AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA EASTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE NORTHERN EUROPE WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN AMERICA CARIBBEAN CENTRAL AMERICA NORTHERN AMERICA 104% 137% 116% 87% 105% 174% 67% 55% 95% 102% 147% 127% 116% 124% 110% 79% 98% 105% 98% SOURCES: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; UNITED NATIONS. NOTE: FIGURES MAY EXCEED 100% BECAUSE SOME INDIVIDUALS MAY USE MORE THAN ONE CELLULAR CONNECTION. REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. GLOBAL OVERVIEW CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS COMPARED WITH TOTAL POPULATION MOBILE CONNECTIVITY FEB 2022
ESSENTIAL DATA FOR DIGITAL ADOPTION AND USE IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD DIGITAL 2022 LOCAL COUNTRY HEADLINES REPORT THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO THE WORLD’S CONNECTED BEHAVIOURS GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT DIGITAL 2022 CLICK HERE TO READ OUR DIGITAL 2022 LOCAL COUNTRY HEADLINES REPORT, WITH ESSENTIAL STATS FOR DIGITAL ADOPTION IN EVERY COUNTRY AROUND THE WORLD CLICK HERE TO READ OUR FLAGSHIP DIGITAL 2022 GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT, PACKED WITH ALL THE NUMBERS YOU NEED TO MAKE SENSE OF THE CURRENT STATE OF DIGITAL EXPLORE OUR COMPLETE COLLECTION OF DIGITAL 2022 GLOBAL DATA
_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_ DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022 _DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_ DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022 WE ARE SOCIAL T H I N K F O R W A R D 2 0 2 2 BRAVE NEW WORLDS You’ve heard about the metaverse, right? Actually, 87% of social media users globally haven’t. But does that even matter, when businesses from Facebook to Fortnite are vying to stake their claim in it? What about web3? Or blockchain? Do you know what an NFT is? As we’ve renegotiated our relationship with digital in the wake of Covid-19, from the fringes of the internet, a wealth of new terms have become mainstays in the marketing press and mainstream media alike, rushing to alleviate the tensions of our new reality . We’re at a tipping point, and the gold rush is in full swing. We’re stepping into Brave New Worlds. In the seventh issue of our annual report Think Forward, we unpick the complex and ever-changing web of digital culture and behaviour, and explore the role brands can play in reflecting and shaping it. The report was informed by ongoing intelligence from our global Cultural Insights team, and supported by a survey of 3,000 people aged 18+ who use social media daily from the US, UK, France, Italy, China and Australia. T H E T R E N D S 1. IN-FEED SYLLABUSES SOCIAL IS BEING REPURPOSED AS A SPACE FOR SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING 2. THE VIBE ECONOMY THE CURATION OF MOODS AND FEELINGS HAS BECOME A COVETED CREATIVE SKILL 3. PRIME TIME PLATFORMS SOCIAL HAS LEVELLED UP FROM ITS ROLE AS A SECOND SCREEN 4. SOCIAL CYNICISM CREATORS ARE FIGHTING TO OVERCOME THE TROPES OF SOCIAL 5. NEW MATERIALISTS PEOPLE ARE INVESTING IN DIGITAL CONTENT AND CREATIVITY PARTNER CONTENT
CHILE
16 19.23 26.32 17.70 17.85 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION 87.9% 136.9% 92.0% 92.8% URBANISATION vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION TOTAL POPULATION CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; GOVERNMENT BODIES; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; ITU; GWI; EUROSTAT; CNNIC; APJII; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND EARNINGS REPORTS; OCDH; TECHRASA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. CHILE OVERVIEW OF THE ADOPTION AND USE OF CONNECTED DEVICES AND SERVICES ESSENTIAL DIGITAL HEADLINES FEB 2022
17 +0.3% +2.3% [N/A] +11.6% +67 THOUSAND +581 THOUSAND [NEW DATA SOURCE] +1.9 MILLION YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE TOTAL POPULATION CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; GOVERNMENT BODIES; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; ITU; GWI; EUROSTAT; CNNIC; APJII; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND EARNINGS REPORTS; OCDH; TECHRASA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: DUE TO COVID-19-RELATED DELAYS IN RESEARCH AND REPORTING, FIGURES FOR INTERNET USER GROWTH MAY UNDER-REPRESENT ACTUAL TRENDS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR MORE DETAILS. SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. CHILE CHANGE IN THE USE OF CONNECTED DEVICES AND SERVICES OVER TIME DIGITAL GROWTH FEB 2022
18 87.9% 25.9 96.4% 96.3% 96.5% 19.23 50.7% 49.3% +0.3% 36.3 MILLION +67 THOUSAND URBAN POPULATION POPULATION DENSITY (PEOPLE PER KM2 ) OVERALL LITERACY (ADULTS AGED 15+) FEMALE LITERACY (ADULTS AGED 15+) MALE LITERACY (ADULTS AGED 15+) TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE POPULATION MALE POPULATION YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN TOTAL POPULATION MEDIAN AGE OF THE POPULATION SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; WORLD BANK; UNESCO; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; OUR WORLD IN DATA; INDEXMUNDI; KNOEMA. CHILE DEMOGRAPHICS AND OTHER KEY INDICATORS POPULATION ESSENTIALS FEB 2022
19 17.3 M 17.5 M 17.7 M 17.9 M 18.1 M 18.3 M 18.6 M 18.8 M 19.0 M 19.2 M 19.2 M +1.0% +1.0% +1.1% +1.3% +1.4% +1.4% +1.3% +1.0% +0.7% +0.3% JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, β€œK” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G. β€œ123 K” = 123,000), β€œM” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND β€œB” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE CHANGES AND BASE REVISIONS. FIGURES MAY NOT CORRELATE WITH VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE TOTAL POPULATION AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE POPULATION OVER TIME FEB 2022 DATAREPORTAL
20 16.0% 14.4% 13.0% 11.4% 13.2% 19.23 5.8% 10.4% 6.5% 9.4% MILLION 65+ 55-64 45-54 35-44 25-34 18-24 13-17 5-12 0-4 POPULATION AGED 25-34 POPULATION AGED 35-44 POPULATION AGED 45-54 POPULATION AGED 55-64 POPULATION AGED 65+ TOTAL POPULATION POPULATION AGED 0-4 POPULATION AGED 5-12 POPULATION AGED 13-17 POPULATION AGED 18-24 SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. CHILE SHARE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION BY AGE GROUP POPULATION BY AGE FEB 2022
INTERNET
22 17.70 92.0% [N/A] 98.9% MILLION [NEW DATA SOURCE] TOTAL INTERNET USERS INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS MOBILE INTERNET PROXY1 : SHARE OF SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE DEVICES SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES; UNITED NATIONS. NOTE: (1) STANDALONE FIGURES FOR MOBILE INTERNET USE WERE UNAVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF REPORT PRODUCTION, BUT THE PERCENTAGE SHARE OF SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACCESSING SOCIAL PLATFORMS VIA MOBILE DEVICES MAY OFFER A REPRESENTATIVE BENCHMARK FOR MOBILE INTERNET USE. ADVISORY: DUE TO COVID-19-RELATED DELAYS IN RESEARCH AND REPORTING, FIGURES FOR INTERNET USER GROWTH MAY UNDER-REPRESENT ACTUAL TRENDS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR MORE DETAILS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. CHILE ESSENTIAL INDICATORS OF INTERNET ADOPTION AND USE OVERVIEW OF INTERNET USE FEB 2022
23 9.05 M 9.63 M 10.2 M 10.9 M 13.9 M 15.3 M 15.3 M 15.5 M 15.7 M 15.8 M 17.7 M CHANGE IN DATA SOURCE +6.4% +6.4% +6.5% +27.0% +10.6% -0.08% +1.3% +1.0% +0.7% [N/A] JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, β€œK” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G. β€œ123 K” = 123,000), β€œM” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND β€œB” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. ADVISORY: DUE TO COVID-19-RELATED DELAYS IN RESEARCH AND REPORTING, FIGURES FOR INTERNET USER GROWTH AFTER 2020 MAY UNDER-REPRESENT ACTUAL TRENDS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR MORE DETAILS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. FIGURES MAY NOT MATCH OR CORRELATE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE INTERNET USERS OVER TIME NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE FEB 2022 DATAREPORTAL
24 15.83 15.83 14.11 MILLION MILLION MILLION 82.3% 82.3% 73.4% vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION INTERNET USERS: ITU INTERNET USERS: CIA WORLD FACTBOOK INTERNET USERS: INTERNETWORLDSTATS SOURCES: AS STATED ABOVE EACH ICON. NOTES: WHERE SOURCES PUBLISH INTERNET ADOPTION AS A PERCENTAGE (I.E. PENETRATION), WE COMPARE THE LATEST PUBLISHED ADOPTION RATES IN EACH COUNTRY TO OUR LATEST FIGURES FOR POPULATION TO DERIVE ABSOLUTE USER NUMBERS. WHERE SOURCES PUBLISH ABSOLUTE USER NUMBERS, WE COMPARE THESE ABSOLUTE USER FIGURES TO OUR LATEST FIGURES FOR POPULATION TO DERIVE VALUES FOR β€œvs. POPULATION”. COMPARABILITY: POTENTIAL MISMATCHES. INTERNET USER FIGURES QUOTED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT USE DATA FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES, INCLUDING SOURCES NOT FEATURED ON THIS SLIDE. CHILE INTERNET USER NUMBERS PUBLISHED BY DIFFERENT SOURCES INTERNET USER PERSPECTIVES FEB 2022
25 14.15 +17.1% 173.09 +94.8% MBPS +2.07 MBPS MBPS +84.22 MBPS MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEED OF CELLULAR MOBILE INTERNET CONNECTIONS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN MEDIAN CELLULAR MOBILE INTERNET CONNECTION SPEED MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEED OF FIXED INTERNET CONNECTIONS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN MEDIAN FIXED INTERNET CONNECTION SPEED SOURCE: OOKLA. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEEDS IN MEGABITS PER SECOND (MBPS) IN NOVEMBER 2021. COMPARABILITY: THE VALUES FOR INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS THAT WE FEATURED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS REFLECTED MEAN CONNECTION SPEEDS, WHEREAS WE NOW FEATURE MEDIAN CONNECTION SPEEDS, WHICH OFFER A MORE REPRESENTATIVE INDICATION OF THE CONNECTION SPEEDS THAT β€œTYPICAL” USERS CAN EXPECT. AS A RESULT, VALUES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH THE VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEEDS (IN MEGABITS PER SECOND) OF MOBILE AND FIXED INTERNET CONNECTIONS INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS FEB 2022
26 52.47% 46.40% 1.06% 0.06% -4.5% (-247 BPS) +5.7% (+252 BPS) -5.4% (-6 BPS) [UNCHANGED] YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE MOBILE PHONES LAPTOP AND DESKTOP COMPUTERS TABLET DEVICES OTHER DEVICES SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO BROWSERS RUNNING ON EACH TYPE OF DEVICE COMPARED WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO BROWSERS RUNNING ON ANY DEVICE IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. CHILE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS RUNNING ON EACH KIND OF DEVICE SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICE FEB 2022
27 1.99% 4.24% 0.04% 0.83% -20.1% (-50 BPS) +76.7% (+184 BPS) [UNCHANGED] -36.6% (-48 BPS) 78.80% 9.29% 2.75% 2.06% -1.8% (-146 BPS) +1.4% (+13 BPS) +45.5% (+86 BPS) -15.9% (-39 BPS) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE SAMSUNG INTERNET OPERA UC BROWSER OTHER YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE CHROME SAFARI MICROSOFT EDGE FIREFOX SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS SERVED TO EACH BROWSER AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PAGE VIEWS SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS RUNNING ON ANY KIND OF DEVICE IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. CHILE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB PAGES SERVED TO EACH BRAND OF WEB BROWSER RUNNING ON ANY DEVICE SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY BROWSER FEB 2022
28 11 FALABELLA.COM 24.2M 7.28M 12M 28S 4.80 12 EMOL.COM 24.0M 3.57M 14M 37S 2.99 13 LATERCERA.COM 23.9M 6.38M 13M 25S 2.18 14 INSTAGRAM.COM 22.3M 5.20M 19M 24S 4.43 15 REDGOL.CL 21.5M 5.60M 10M 22S 1.62 16 PORNHUB.COM 19.2M 4.16M 13M 43S 7.59 17 LACUARTA.COM 19.0M 4.42M 8M 22S 2.11 18 TRANSBANK.CL 17.9M 5.53M 2M 52S 4.34 19 RIPLEY.CL 15.4M 5.64M 11M 22S 5.80 20 YAPO.CL 15.2M 3.30M 13M 53S 8.71 01 GOOGLE.COM 280M 19.6M 20M 49S 5.34 02 YOUTUBE.COM 88.0M 11.1M 7M 33S 3.51 03 FACEBOOK.COM 58.0M 8.73M 20M 48S 5.98 04 BANCOESTADO.CL 56.3M 9.04M 6M 02S 6.38 05 XVIDEOS.COM 54.2M 6.39M 18M 21S 8.31 06 GOOGLE.CL 51.4M 6.32M 15M 57S 6.11 07 XNXX.COM 40.8M 5.77M 18M 12S 8.14 08 BIOBIOCHILE.CL 37.7M 6.92M 10M 55S 2.21 09 MERCADOLIBRE.CL 35.7M 10.4M 10M 05S 5.39 10 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 31.7M 8.42M 10M 02S 2.02 # WEBSITE TOTAL VISITS UNIQUE VISITORS TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT # WEBSITE TOTAL VISITS UNIQUE VISITORS TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT SOURCE: SEMRUSH. FIGURES REPRESENT TRAFFIC VALUES FOR NOVEMBER 2021. NOTE: β€œUNIQUE VISITORS” REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF DISTINCT β€˜IDENTITIES’ ACCESSING EACH SITE, BUT MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AS SOME PEOPLE MAY USE MULTIPLE DEVICES OR BROWSERS. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE METHODOLOGY CHANGES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES: SEMRUSH RANKING RANKING OF THE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES ACCORDING TO SEMRUSH, BASED ON TOTAL MONTHLY WEBSITE TRAFFIC IN NOVEMBER 2021 FEB 2022
29 01 GOOGLE.COM 65.4% 34.6% 2.41% 0.68% 1.29% 0.11% 0.07% 0.02% 0.16% <0.01% 02 YOUTUBE.COM 18.9% 81.1% 0.58% 0.08% 0.09% 0.19% <0.01% <0.01% 0.04% – 03 FACEBOOK.COM 81.3% 18.7% 0.01% 0.07% 0.22% 0.06% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% 04 BANCOESTADO.CL 81.9% 18.1% 0.21% 0.02% 0.03% 0.02% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% – 05 XVIDEOS.COM 94.2% 5.8% 0.12% <0.01% 0.05% 0.07% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% – 06 GOOGLE.CL 55.3% 44.7% 1.06% 0.07% 0.18% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% 0.03% – 07 XNXX.COM 95.9% 4.1% 0.06% <0.01% 0.03% 0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% – 08 BIOBIOCHILE.CL 90.9% 9.1% 0.46% <0.01% 0.04% 0.98% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% – 09 MERCADOLIBRE.CL 67.2% 32.8% 0.13% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% – 10 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 64.7% 35.3% 0.04% <0.01% 0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% – # WEBSITE SHARE OF TRAFFIC FROM MOBILES SHARE OF TRAFFIC FROM COMPUTERS TRAFFIC FROM FACEBOOK REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM YOUTUBE REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM INSTAGRAM REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM TWITTER REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM LINKEDIN REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM PINTEREST REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM REDDIT REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM VK REFERRALS SOURCE: SEMRUSH. FIGURES REPRESENT TRAFFIC VALUES FOR NOVEMBER 2021. NOTE: TRAFFIC FROM SOCIAL MEDIA REFERRALS REPRESENT THE SHARE OF TOTAL WEBSITE VISITS THAT ORIGINATED FROM A CLICK OR A TAP ON A LINK PUBLISHED ON THE RESPECTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE METHODOLOGY CHANGES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE SHARE OF WEBSITE TRAFFIC BY DEVICE, AND SHARE OF WEBSITE TRAFFIC REFERRED BY A SELECTION OF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS IN NOVEMBER 2021 TOP WEBSITE TRAFFIC DETAIL (SEMRUSH) FEB 2022
30 11 NETFLIX.COM 396M 5.8% 94.2% 9M 38S 4.15 12 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 377M 55.6% 44.4% 3M 43S 2.66 13 ZOOM.US 347M 34.2% 65.8% 4M 27S 2.92 14 XNXX.COM 342M 97.3% 2.7% 3M 47S 10.83 15 FALABELLA.COM 299M 63.9% 36.1% 6M 56S 5.75 16 EMOL.COM 287M 50.3% 49.7% 5M 50S 2.90 17 LIVE.COM 263M 25.0% 75.0% 8M 12S 7.99 18 CLAVEUNICA.GOB.CL 257M 46.2% 53.8% 3M 16S 2.54 19 BIOBIOCHILE.CL 251M 80.8% 19.2% 4M 47S 2.52 20 TRANSBANK.CL 219M 42.0% 58.0% 4M 09S 7.58 01 GOOGLE.COM 8.78B 51.1% 48.9% 12M 25S 8.85 02 YOUTUBE.COM 3.06B 13.5% 86.5% 24M 05S 13.43 03 FACEBOOK.COM 1.74B 55.1% 44.9% 9M 24S 7.80 04 INSTAGRAM.COM 801M 56.1% 43.9% 10M 01S 13.16 05 GOOGLE.CL 679M 40.0% 60.0% 7M 54S 11.61 06 BANCOESTADO.CL 660M 74.8% 25.2% 4M 39S 7.82 07 WHATSAPP.COM 643M 8.1% 91.9% 3M 37S 1.49 08 TWITTER.COM 546M 52.7% 47.3% 10M 22S 10.56 09 XVIDEOS.COM 539M 92.0% 8.0% 10M 07S 8.29 10 MERCADOLIBRE.CL 401M 45.3% 54.7% 7M 31S 7.92 # WEBSITE TOTAL VISITS MOBILE SHARE DESKTOP SHARE TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT # WEBSITE TOTAL VISITS MOBILE SHARE DESKTOP SHARE TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT SOURCE: SIMILARWEB. FIGURES REPRESENT TRAFFIC VALUES BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS. CHILE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES: SIMILARWEB RANKING RANKING OF THE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES ACCORDING TO SIMILARWEB, BASED ON ANNUAL WEBSITE TRAFFIC FOR FULL-YEAR 2021 FEB 2022
31 11 BANCOCHILE.CL 06M 53S 5.58 12 INSTAGRAM.COM 09M 00S 11.40 13 ZOOM.US 06M 27S 3.52 14 FALABELLA.COM 06M 07S 4.70 15 EMOL.COM 05M 41S 3.01 16 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 03M 39S 3.05 17 AMAZON.COM 11M 18S 10.22 18 LIVE.COM 05M 24S 5.56 19 NETFLIX.COM 04M 46S 3.61 20 SANTANDER.CL 05M 21S 2.77 01 GOOGLE.COM 17M 26S 18.49 02 YOUTUBE.COM 19M 22S 10.53 03 BIOBIOCHILE.CL 03M 22S 2.20 04 GOOGLE.CL 04M 07S 7.34 05 MERCADOLIBRE.CL 11M 57S 12.40 06 FACEBOOK.COM 17M 46S 8.56 07 LUN.COM 06M 05S 1.70 08 SII.CL 10M 23S 10.60 09 TRANSBANK.CL 01M 55S 5.75 10 BANCOESTADO.CL 05M 10S 6.26 # WEBSITE TIME PER DAY PAGES PER DAY # WEBSITE TIME PER DAY PAGES PER DAY SOURCE: ALEXA INTERNET, USING FIGURES PUBLISHED IN DECEMBER 2021. NOTES: ALEXA INTERNET IS THE NAME OF AMAZON’S INSIGHTS ARM, AND DATA SHOWN HERE ARE NOT RESTRICTED TO ACTIVITIES ON ALEXA VOICE PLATFORMS. β€œTIME PER DAY” FIGURES REPRESENT THE AVERAGE DAILY AMOUNT OF TIME THAT GLOBAL VISITORS SPEND ON EACH DOMAIN, MEASURED IN MINUTES AND SECONDS. β€œPAGES PER DAY” REPRESENT THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF PAGES THAT GLOBAL VISITORS OPEN ON THE DOMAIN EACH DAY. BECAUSE FIGURES FOR β€œTIME PER DAY” AND β€œPAGES PER DAY” REFLECT GLOBAL ACTIVITY, VALUES WILL BE THE SAME ACROSS ALL COUNTRIES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS. CHILE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES: ALEXA RANKING RANKING OF THE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES ACCORDING TO ALEXA INTERNET, BASED ON TOTAL MONTHLY WEBSITE TRAFFIC FEB 2022
32 0.04% 0.14% 0.09% 0.10% +300% (+3 BPS) +40.0% (+4 BPS) -10.0% (-1 BP) +233% (+7 BPS) 97.09% 1.83% 0% 0.71% -1.2% (-122 BPS) +63.4% (+71 BPS) [UNCHANGED] +115% (+38 BPS) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YANDEX DUCKDUCKGO ECOSIA OTHER YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE GOOGLE BING BAIDU YAHOO! SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF PAGE VIEW REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM EACH SERVICE AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PAGE VIEW REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM SEARCH ENGINES IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. CHILE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB TRAFFIC REFERRED BY SEARCH ENGINES THAT ORIGINATED FROM EACH SEARCH SERVICE SEARCH ENGINE MARKET SHARE FEB 2022
33 01 CHILE 100 02 TIEMPO 39 03 TRADUCTOR 21 04 YOUTUBE 17 05 BANCO ESTADO 15 06 GOOGLE 15 07 WHATSAPP 14 08 FACEBOOK 14 09 IFE 14 10 FALABELLA 13 11 EL TIEMPO 12 12 TIEMPO MAΓ‘ANA 11 13 WHATSAPP WEB 11 14 RIPLEY 9 15 TRADUCTOR ESPAΓ‘OL INGLES 7 16 COLO COLO 7 17 BANCA EN LINEA 7 18 CUENTA RUT 7 19 CHILE VS 6 20 INSTAGRAM 6 # SEARCH QUERY INDEX # SEARCH QUERY INDEX SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, BASED ON SEARCHES CONDUCTED BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021. NOTES: ANY SPELLING ERRORS OR LANGUAGE INCONSISTENCIES IN SEARCH QUERIES ARE AS PUBLISHED BY GOOGLE TRENDS, AND ARE SHOWN β€œAS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CHANGES IN HOW PEOPLE ENTER WRITTEN LANGUAGE IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS. GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH ABSOLUTE SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE β€œINDEX vs. TOP QUERY” COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE SEARCH VOLUMES FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED WITH THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY. ADVISORY: GOOGLE TRENDS USES DYNAMIC SAMPLING, SO RANK ORDER AND INDEX VALUES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON WHEN THE TOOL IS ACCESSED, EVEN FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD. CHILE QUERIES WITH THE GREATEST VOLUME OF GOOGLE SEARCH ACTIVITY BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021 TOP GOOGLE SEARCHES FEB 2022
34 $23.93 $18.64 $8.07 $9.23 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION +47.5% (+$7.7 MILLION) +44.9% (+$5.8 MILLION) +52.1% (+$2.8 MILLION) +58.1% (+$3.4 MILLION) 625.1 $162.6 $78.20 $24.52 THOUSAND MILLION MILLION MILLION +11.0% (+62 THOUSAND) +51.1% (+$55 MILLION) +49.6% (+$26 MILLION) +62.5% (+$9.4 MILLION) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE VALUE OF SMART HOME SECURITY DEVICE MARKET VALUE OF SMART HOME ENTERTAINMENT DEVICE MARKET VALUE OF SMART HOME COMFORT & LIGHTING MARKET VALUE OF SMART HOME ENERGY MANAGEMENT MARKET YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE NUMBER OF HOMES WITH SMART HOME DEVICES TOTAL ANNUAL VALUE OF THE SMART HOME DEVICES MARKET VALUE OF SMART HOME APPLIANCES MARKET VALUE OF SMART HOME CONTROL & CONNECTIVITY DEVICE MARKET SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: β€œSMART HOME DEVICES” INCLUDE: DIGITALLY CONNECTED AND CONTROLLED HOME DEVICES THAT CAN BE REMOTELY CONTROLLED; SENSORS, ACTUATORS AND CLOUD SERVICES THAT ENABLE HOME AUTOMATION; CONTROL HUBS THAT CONNECT SENSORS AND ACTUATORS TO REMOTE CONTROLS AND TO EACH OTHER; AND SMART HOME-RELATED SOFTWARE SALES (INCLUDING SUBSCRIPTION FEES). DOES NOT INCLUDE SMART TVS, OR B2B OR C2C SALES. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR REVENUES FOR 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. CHILE VALUE OF THE MARKET FOR SMART HOME DEVICES (U.S. DOLLARS) SMART HOME MARKET OVERVIEW FEB 2022
35 $83.21 $59.09 $33.59 $50.07 +17.5% (+$12.37) +18.6% (+$9.28) +21.7% (+$5.99) +21.9% (+$9.01) 11.4% $260 $297 $122 +9.7% (+110 BPS) +36.2% (+$69.12) +20.3% (+$50.07) +29.1% (+$27.41) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE ARPU: SMART HOME SECURITY DEVICES ARPU: SMART HOME ENTERTAINMENT DEVICES ARPU: SMART HOME COMFORT & LIGHTING ARPU: SMART HOME ENERGY MANAGEMENT YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE PENETRATION OF SMART HOME DEVICES ARPU: SPEND ON ALL SMART HOME DEVICES ARPU: SMART HOME APPLIANCES ARPU: SMART HOME CONTROL & CONNECTIVITY DEVICES SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: β€œSMART HOME DEVICES” INCLUDE: DIGITALLY CONNECTED AND CONTROLLED HOME DEVICES THAT CAN BE REMOTELY CONTROLLED; SENSORS, ACTUATORS AND CLOUD SERVICES THAT ENABLE HOME AUTOMATION; CONTROL HUBS THAT CONNECT SENSORS AND ACTUATORS TO REMOTE CONTROLS AND TO EACH OTHER; AND SMART HOME-RELATED SOFTWARE SALES (INCLUDING SUBSCRIPTION FEES). DOES NOT INCLUDE SMART TVS, OR B2B OR C2C SALES. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR SPEND PER SMART HOME FOR 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. CHILE AVERAGE ANNUAL SPEND ON SMART HOME DEVICES PER SMART HOME (U.S. DOLLARS) AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE PER SMART HOME FEB 2022
SOCIAL MEDIA
37 +11.6% 50.1% 49.9% +1.9 MILLION 17.85 92.8% 110.8% MILLION YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN SOCIAL MEDIA USERS FEMALE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS vs. TOTAL SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MALE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS vs. TOTAL SOCIAL MEDIA USERS NUMBER OF SOCIAL MEDIA USERS SOCIAL MEDIA USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION SOCIAL MEDIA USERS vs. POPULATION AGE 13+ SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS; CNNIC; TECHRASA; OCDH; U.N.; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR FURTHER DETAILS. CHILE HEADLINES FOR SOCIAL MEDIA ADOPTION AND USE (NOTE: USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) OVERVIEW OF SOCIAL MEDIA USE FEB 2022
38 10.4 M 10.8 M 11.0 M 13.0 M 14.0 M 14.0 M 15.0 M 16.0 M 17.9 M +3.8% +1.9% +18.2% +7.7% 0% +7.1% +6.7% +11.6% JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, β€œK” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G. β€œ123 K” = 123,000), β€œM” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND β€œB” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: CHANGES TO DATA SOURCES AND SIGNIFICANT BASE REVISIONS IN SOURCE DATA MAY MEAN THAT FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE BETWEEN CERTAIN YEARS. CHILE NUMBER OF SOCIAL MEDIA USERS AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS OVER TIME FEB 2022 DATAREPORTAL
39 2.0% 2.1% 9.9% 10.7% 14.1% 15.8% 9.3% 8.7% 6.8% 6.2% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.4% 13 – 17 YEARS OLD 18 – 24 YEARS OLD 25 – 34 YEARS OLD 35 – 44 YEARS OLD 45 – 54 YEARS OLD 55 – 64 YEARS OLD 65+ YEARS OLD FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. NOTE: META ONLY PERMITS PEOPLE AGED 13 AND ABOVE TO USE ITS PLATFORMS, SO WHILE THERE MAY BE USERS BELOW THE AGE OF 13, THEY DO NOT FEATURE IN THE AVAILABLE DATA. META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE”. COMPARABILITY: IMPORTANT BASE DATA REVISIONS AND SOURCE REPORTING CHANGES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE SHARE OF COMBINED, DEDUPLICATED POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH ACROSS FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM, AND MESSENGER, BY AGE AND GENDER DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF META’S AD AUDIENCE FEB 2022 DATAREPORTAL
40 0.76% 0.73% 0.13% 0.01% 0.02% +130% (+43 BPS) +78.0% (+32 BPS) +8.3% (+1 BP) [UNCHANGED] +100% (+1 BP) 66.03% 3.47% 11.88% 12.64% 4.33% +3.1% (+197 BPS) -28.9% (-141 BPS) +26.1% (+246 BPS) +166% (+789 BPS) -73.0% (-1,168 BPS) REDDIT TUMBLR LINKEDIN VKONTAKTE OTHER FACEBOOK TWITTER PINTEREST INSTAGRAM YOUTUBE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: SHARE DOES NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC FROM MESSENGER PLATFORMS. DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR A SELECTION OF PLATFORMS, AND PERCENTAGES REFLECT SHARE OF AVAILABLE PLATFORMS ONLY. FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF WEB PAGE REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM EACH SERVICE AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB PAGE REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM THE AVAILABLE SELECTION OF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS ON ANY DEVICE IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. CHILE SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC ARRIVING ON THIRD-PARTY WEBSITES VIA CLICKS OR TAPS ON LINKS PUBLISHED IN SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS (ANY DEVICE) WEB TRAFFIC REFERRALS FROM SOCIAL MEDIA FEB 2022
SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS
! In Q4 2021, Meta made some important changes to how its self-service tools report the potential advertising reach of its platforms, including a move to publishing audience figures as a range instead of as an absolute number. Our analysis suggests that Meta also revised its base data, resulting in some important corrections to published audience figures for Facebook and Messenger. As a result, we are currently unable to provide any figures for changes over time in these platforms’ audiences, and we advise readers not to compare the advertising audience figures for Facebook and Messenger contained within this report with figures published for those platforms in previous reports. For more information, please read our complete notes on data variance, potential mismatches, and curiosities: https://datareportal.com/notes-on-data. CHANGES IN META’S DATA REPORTING
43 12.50 65.0% 77.6% 52.0% 48.0% MILLION POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT META REPORTS CAN BE REACHED WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK FACEBOOK’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION FACEBOOK’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION AGED 13+ PERCENTAGE OF ITS AD AUDIENCE THAT FACEBOOK REPORTS IS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF ITS AD AUDIENCE THAT FACEBOOK REPORTS IS MALE SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE”. COMPARABILITY: META HAS SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK FACEBOOK: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
44 98.9% 1.1% 22.4% 76.5% USE ANY KIND OF MOBILE PHONE ONLY USE LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER USE BOTH COMPUTERS AND MOBILE PHONES ONLY USE MOBILE PHONES (ANY TYPE) SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES, BASED ON DATA PUBLISHED IN JUNE 2021. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT VALUES FOR ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE. CHILE PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK’S ADVERTISING AUDIENCE THAT USES EACH DEVICE TO ACCESS THE PLATFORM, EITHER VIA AN APP OR A WEB BROWSER DEVICES USED TO ACCESS FACEBOOK FEB 2022
45 1 1 12 8 9 4 2 1 27 19 1 10 6 2 23 FACEBOOK PAGES β€œLIKED” (LIFETIME) POSTS β€œLIKED” IN THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS COMMENTS MADE IN THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS POSTS SHARED IN THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS ADS CLICKED OR TAPPED IN THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES, BASED ON DATA PUBLISHED IN JUNE 2021. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT MEDIAN VALUES FOR ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE. β€œADS” MAY INCLUDE ANY KIND OF PAID CONTENT PUBLISHED TO FACEBOOK, INCLUDING SPONSORED POSTS. CHILE THE NUMBER OF TIMES A β€œTYPICAL” USER AGED 18+ PERFORMS EACH ACTIVITY ON FACEBOOK FACEBOOK ACTIVITY FREQUENCY FEB 2022
46 13.16 88.5% 51.0% 49.0% MILLION 15.60 81.1% 88.1% +8.3% MILLION +1.2 MILLION POTENTIAL REACH OF ADS ON YOUTUBE YOUTUBE AD REACH vs. TOTAL POPULATION YOUTUBE AD REACH vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN YOUTUBE AD REACH YOUTUBE’S ADVERTISING REACH: USERS AGED 18+ YOUTUBE’S AD REACH AGE 18+ vs. TOTAL POPULATION AGE 18+ FEMALE YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+ vs. TOTAL YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+ MALE YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+ vs. TOTAL YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+ SOURCES: GOOGLE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE LOCATIONS ONLY. GOOGLE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER AND AGE DATA FOR USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE, AND ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE”. FIGURE FOR POTENTIAL REACH AGE 18+ USES A DIFFERENT AUDIENCE TOTAL TO THE ONE USED FOR REACH OF TOTAL POPULATION. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON YOUTUBE YOUTUBE: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
47 01 MUSICA 100 02 PELICULAS 83 03 CANCIONES 74 04 MARCIANEKE 72 05 PELICULAS COMPLETAS EN ESPAΓ‘OL 53 06 REGGAETON 42 07 TIK TOK 40 08 TIKTOK 37 09 MINECRAFT 34 10 PELICULAS COMPLETAS EN ESPAΓ‘OL LATINO 28 11 KAROL G 27 12 MÚSICA 26 13 BAD BUNNY 25 14 KARAOKE 23 15 SALSA 22 16 ANUEL 21 17 RAP 20 18 ELLA 20 19 FREE FIRE 18 20 DIANA 18 # SEARCH QUERY INDEX # SEARCH QUERY INDEX SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, BASED ON SEARCHES CONDUCTED ON YOUTUBE BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021. NOTE: ANY SPELLING ERRORS OR LANGUAGE INCONSISTENCIES IN SEARCH QUERIES ARE AS PUBLISHED BY GOOGLE TRENDS, AND ARE SHOWN β€œAS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CHANGES IN HOW PEOPLE ENTER WRITTEN LANGUAGE IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS. GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH ABSOLUTE SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE β€œINDEX” COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE SEARCH VOLUMES FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED WITH THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY. ADVISORY: GOOGLE TRENDS USES DYNAMIC SAMPLING, SO RANK ORDER AND INDEX VALUES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON WHEN THE TOOL IS ACCESSED, EVEN FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD. CHILE QUERIES WITH THE GREATEST VOLUME OF YOUTUBE SEARCH ACTIVITY BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021 TOP YOUTUBE SEARCHES FEB 2022
48 65.8% 72.3% 51.3% 48.7% 11.65 60.6% +9.9% +20.1% MILLION +1.1 MILLION +2.0 MILLION 90 INSTAGRAM AD REACH vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS INSTAGRAM AD REACH vs. POPULATION AGED 13+ FEMALE INSTAGRAM AD REACH vs. TOTAL INSTAGRAM AD REACH MALE INSTAGRAM AD REACH vs. TOTAL INSTAGRAM AD REACH TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH OF ADS ON INSTAGRAM INSTAGRAM AD REACH vs. TOTAL POPULATION QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE IN INSTAGRAM AD REACH YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN INSTAGRAM AD REACH SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY: META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE MAY NOT BE COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON INSTAGRAM INSTAGRAM: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
49 48.3% 57.5% 62.0% 38.0% 8.55 44.5% +11.6% [N/A] MILLION +887 THOUSAND [NEW DATA POINT] 90 TIKTOK AD REACH AGE 18+ vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS TIKTOK AD REACH AGE 18+ vs. POPULATION AGE 18+ FEMALE TIKTOK AD REACH vs. TOTAL TIKTOK AD REACH MALE TIKTOK AD REACH vs. TOTAL TIKTOK AD REACH POTENTIAL REACH OF ADS ON TIKTOK (AGE 18+ ONLY) TIKTOK AD REACH AGE 18+ vs. TOTAL POPULATION QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE IN TIKTOK AD REACH YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN TIKTOK AD REACH SOURCES: BYTEDANCE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE LOCATIONS ONLY. FIGURES USE THE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. BYTEDANCE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH AUDIENCE DATA FOR USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE, BUT ALLOW MARKETERS TO TARGET ADS TO USERS AGED 13 AND ABOVE. BYTEDANCE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE”. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE AGED 18+ THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON TIKTOK TIKTOK: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
50 8.40 43.7% 52.1% 53.3% 46.7% MILLION POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT META REPORTS CAN BE REACHED WITH ADS ON MESSENGER MESSENGER’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION MESSENGER’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION AGED 13+ PERCENTAGE OF ITS AD AUDIENCE THAT MESSENGER REPORTS IS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF ITS AD AUDIENCE THAT MESSENGER REPORTS IS MALE SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. SOME MESSENGER AD FORMATS ARE CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE IN AUSTRALIA, CANADA, FRANCE, AND THE UNITED STATES, AND THIS MAY HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH FIGURES IN THOSE COUNTRIES. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE”. COMPARABILITY: META HAS SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK MESSENGER MESSENGER: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
51 35.0% 41.7% 45.8% 54.2% 6.20 32.2% +1.6% +10.7% MILLION +100 THOUSAND +600 THOUSAND 90 LINKEDIN AD REACH vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS LINKEDIN AD REACH vs. POPULATION AGED 18+ FEMALE LINKEDIN AD REACH vs. TOTAL LINKEDIN AD REACH MALE LINKEDIN AD REACH vs. TOTAL LINKEDIN AD REACH TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH OF ADS ON LINKEDIN LINKEDIN AD REACH vs. TOTAL POPULATION QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE IN LINKEDIN AD REACH YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN LINKEDIN AD REACH SOURCES: MICROSOFT’S LINKEDIN ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE OR REGISTERED MEMBER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTE: REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY: THE FIGURES PUBLISHED IN LINKEDIN’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES REFLECT TOTAL REGISTERED MEMBERS (NOT ACTIVE USERS), SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT DIRECTLY COMPARABLE WITH OTHER PLATFORMS. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON LINKEDIN LINKEDIN: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
52 6.2% 6.8% 78.7% 20.3% 1.10 5.7% 0% -21.4% MILLION [UNCHANGED] -300 THOUSAND 90 SNAPCHAT AD REACH vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS SNAPCHAT AD REACH vs. POPULATION AGED 13+ FEMALE SNAPCHAT AD REACH vs. TOTAL SNAPCHAT AD REACH MALE SNAPCHAT AD REACH vs. TOTAL SNAPCHAT AD REACH TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH OF ADS ON SNAPCHAT SNAPCHAT AD REACH vs. TOTAL POPULATION QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE IN SNAPCHAT AD REACH YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN SNAPCHAT AD REACH SOURCES: SNAP’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA ONLY, USING MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. GENDER DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE” USERS, BUT GENDER AUDIENCE VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO THE TOTAL AUDIENCE FIGURE, SO GENDER PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100%. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON SNAPCHAT SNAPCHAT: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
53 2.90 15.1% 18.0% 16.4% +1.8% MILLION +50 THOUSAND 90 POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT TWITTER REPORTS CAN BE REACHED WITH ADS ON TWITTER TWITTER’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION TWITTER’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION AGED 13+ TWITTER’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL INTERNET USERS QUARTER-ON- QUARTER CHANGE IN TWITTER’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH SOURCES: TWITTER’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. FIGURES PUBLISHED IN TWITTER’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ARE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT FLUCTUATION, EVEN WITHIN SHORT PERIODS OF TIME. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. DUE TO ANOMALIES IN SOURCE DATA, WE ARE CURRENTLY UNABLE TO OFFER DATA FOR TWITTER USE BY GENDER. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON TWITTER TWITTER: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
MOBILE
55 26.32 136.9% +2.3% 96.3% MILLION +581 THOUSAND NUMBER OF CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS (EXCLUDING IOT) NUMBER OF CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS COMPARED WITH TOTAL POPULATION YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS SHARE OF CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE BROADBAND (3G, 4G, 5G) SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE. NOTES: TOTAL CELLULAR CONNECTIONS INCLUDE DEVICES OTHER THAN MOBILE PHONES, BUT EXCLUDE CELLULAR IOT CONNECTIONS. FIGURES MAY SIGNIFICANTLY EXCEED FIGURES FOR POPULATION DUE TO MULTIPLE CONNECTIONS AND CONNECTED DEVICES PER PERSON. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. VERSIONS OF THIS CHART PUBLISHED IN SOME OF OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS FEATURED CELLULAR CONNECTION FIGURES THAT INCLUDED CELLULAR IOT CONNECTIONS. FIGURES SHOWN HERE DO NOT INCLUDE CELLULAR IOT CONNECTIONS. CHILE USE OF MOBILE PHONES AND DEVICES THAT CONNECT TO CELLULAR NETWORKS MOBILE CONNECTIVITY FEB 2022
56 25.8 M 26.3 M 26.7 M 26.5 M 25.7 M 26.3 M +2.1% +1.4% -0.7% -2.9% +2.3% Q4 2016 Q4 2017 Q4 2018 Q4 2019 Q4 2020 Q4 2021 SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, β€œK” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G. β€œ123 K” = 123,000), β€œM” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND β€œB” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. COMPARABILITY: BASE REVISIONS. NUMBERS MAY NOT CORRELATE WITH VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE NUMBER OF CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS OVER TIME FEB 2022
57 $82.86 7.2% $0.39 0.03% PRICE OF THE CHEAPEST SMARTPHONE HANDSET (IN USD) PRICE OF THE CHEAPEST SMARTPHONE HANDSET vs. AVERAGE INCOME AVERAGE PRICE OF 1GB OF CELLULAR MOBILE DATA (IN USD) AVERAGE PRICE OF 1GB OF CELLULAR MOBILE DATA vs. AVERAGE INCOME SOURCES: HANDSET PRICES: ALLIANCE FOR AFFORDABLE INTERNET; ACCESS THE FULL DATASET AT A4AI.ORG. MOBILE DATA PRICES: CABLE.CO.UK; WORLD BANK. COMPARABILITY: VALUE FOR HANDSET PRICES vs. MONTHLY INCOME AS PUBLISHED BY A4AI, AND MAY USE A DIFFERENT VALUE FOR AVERAGE MONTHLY INCOME COMPARED WITH THE DATA USED TO CALCULATE THE PRICE OF 1GB OF MOBILE DATA vs. MONTHLY INCOME. AS A RESULT, VALUES MAY NOT CORRELATE ACROSS DATA POINTS. CHILE THE COST OF BUYING A SMARTPHONE HANDSET AND 1GB OF CELLULAR MOBILE DATA, AND COMPARISONS WITH AVERAGE MONTHLY INCOME AFFORDABILITY OF MOBILE INTERNET ACCESS FEB 2022
58 83.71% 16.07% 0.20% 0% 0.02% -1.6% (-138 BPS) +9.2% (+136 BPS) +17.6% (+3 BPS) [UNCHANGED] -33.3% (-1 BP) SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC ORIGINATING FROM ANDROID DEVICES SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC ORIGINATING FROM APPLE IOS DEVICES SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC ORIGINATING FROM SAMSUNG OS DEVICES SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC ORIGINATING FROM KAI OS DEVICES SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC ORIGINATING FROM OTHER OS DEVICES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO BROWSERS ON MOBILE PHONES RUNNING EACH OPERATING SYSTEM COMPARED WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO MOBILE BROWSERS IN NOVEMBER 2021. FIGURES FOR SAMSUNG OS REFER ONLY TO THOSE DEVICES RUNNING OPERATING SYSTEMS DEVELOPED BY SAMSUNG (E.G. BADA AND TIZEN), AND DO NOT INCLUDE SAMSUNG DEVICES RUNNING ANDROID. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. CHILE PERCENTAGE OF WEB PAGE REQUESTS ORIGINATING FROM MOBILE HANDSETS RUNNING EACH MOBILE OPERATING SYSTEM SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC BY MOBILE OS FEB 2022
59 913.0 +6% $355.0 +59% MILLION MILLION TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE APP DOWNLOADS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE APP DOWNLOADS ANNUAL CONSUMER SPEND ON MOBILE APPS AND IN-APP PURCHASES (USD) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN CONSUMER SPEND ON MOBILE APPS AND IN-APP PURCHASES SOURCES: APP ANNIE β€œSTATE OF MOBILE 2022” REPORT. SEE STATEOFMOBILE2022.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT COMBINED CONSUMER ACTIVITY ACROSS THE GOOGLE PLAY STORE, APPLE IOS APP STORE, AND THIRD-PARTY ANDROID APP STORES BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021. β€œCONSUMER SPEND” ONLY INCLUDES SPEND ON APPS AND IN-APP PURCHASES VIA APP STORES, AND DOES NOT INCLUDE REVENUES FROM ECOMMERCE TRANSACTIONS OR MOBILE ADVERTISING. CONSUMER SPEND FIGURES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. CHILE HEADLINES FOR MOBILE APP DOWNLOADS AND CONSUMER SPEND (IN U.S. DOLLARS) BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021 MOBILE APP MARKET OVERVIEW FEB 2022
60 01 WHATSAPP META 02 FACEBOOK META 03 INSTAGRAM META 04 FACEBOOK MESSENGER META 05 SPOTIFY SPOTIFY 06 BANCOESTADO BANCOESTADO 07 MERCADOLIBRE MERCADOLIBRE 08 NETFLIX NETFLIX 09 ALIEXPRESS ALIBABA GROUP 10 TWITTER TWITTER 01 POKΓ‰MON GO NIANTIC 02 FREE FIRE SEA 03 CLASH ROYALE SUPERCELL 04 CALL OF DUTY: MOBILE ACTIVISION BLIZZARD 05 AMONG US! INNERSLOTH 06 POKΓ‰MON UNITE POKEMON 07 ROBLOX ROBLOX 08 AETHERSX2 TAHLRETH 09 BRAWL STARS SUPERCELL 10 MINECRAFT POCKET EDITION MICROSOFT # MOBILE APP COMPANY # MOBILE GAME COMPANY SOURCE: APP ANNIE β€œSTATE OF MOBILE 2022” REPORT. SEE STATEOFMOBILE2022.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: RANKINGS BASED ON COMBINED MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS ACROSS IPHONES AND ANDROID PHONES BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021, EXCLUDING PRE-INSTALLED APPS (E.G. YOUTUBE ON ANDROID PHONES, IMESSAGE ON IPHONES). CHILE APP ANNIE’S RANKING OF MOBILE APPS AND MOBILE GAMES BY AVERAGE NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021 APP ANNIE APP RANKING: ACTIVE USERS FEB 2022
61 01 TIKTOK BYTEDANCE 02 WHATSAPP META 03 DISNEY+ DISNEY 04 ZOOM CLOUD MEETINGS ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS 05 INSTAGRAM META 06 QR & BARCODE READER TEACAPPS 07 SHEIN SHEIN 08 MERCADOLIBRE MERCADOLIBRE 09 BANCOESTADO BANCOESTADO 10 SHOPEE SEA 01 FREE FIRE SEA 02 ROBLOX ROBLOX 03 AMONG US! INNERSLOTH 04 PK XD NASPERS 05 BRIDGE RACE IRONSOURCE 06 DOP 2: DELETE ONE PART SAYGAMES 07 TOCA LIFE: WORLD SPIN MASTER 08 HAIR CHALLENGE ZYNGA 09 PHONE CASE DIY CRAZY LABS 10 SCULPT PEOPLE CRAZY LABS # MOBILE APP COMPANY # MOBILE GAME COMPANY SOURCE: APP ANNIE β€œSTATE OF MOBILE 2022” REPORT. SEE STATEOFMOBILE2022.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: RANKINGS BASED ON COMBINED CONSUMER ACTIVITY ACROSS THE GOOGLE PLAY STORE AND APPLE IOS APP STORE BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021. CHILE APP ANNIE’S RANKING OF MOBILE APPS AND MOBILE GAMES BY TOTAL NUMBER OF DOWNLOADS BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021 APP ANNIE APP RANKING: DOWNLOADS FEB 2022
62 01 DISNEY+ DISNEY 02 TINDER MATCH GROUP 03 TWITCH AMAZON 04 CRUNCHYROLL SONY 05 GOOGLE ONE GOOGLE 06 BADOO BUMBLE 07 TIKTOK BYTEDANCE 08 FACEBOOK META 09 AMAZON PRIME VIDEO AMAZON 10 HBO MAX AT&T 01 FREE FIRE SEA 02 ROBLOX ROBLOX 03 COIN MASTER MOON ACTIVE 04 CANDY CRUSH SAGA ACTIVISION BLIZZARD 05 CALL OF DUTY: MOBILE ACTIVISION BLIZZARD 06 CLASH ROYALE SUPERCELL 07 GENSHIN IMPACT MIHOYO 08 HOMESCAPES PLAYRIX 09 GARDENSCAPES - NEW ACRES PLAYRIX 10 BRAWL STARS SUPERCELL # MOBILE APP COMPANY # MOBILE GAME COMPANY SOURCE: APP ANNIE β€œSTATE OF MOBILE 2022” REPORT. SEE STATEOFMOBILE2022.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: RANKINGS BASED ON COMBINED CONSUMER ACTIVITY ACROSS THE GOOGLE PLAY STORE AND APPLE IOS APP STORE BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021. β€œCONSUMER SPEND” ONLY INCLUDES SPEND ON APPS AND IN-APP PURCHASES VIA APP STORES, AND DOES NOT INCLUDE REVENUES FROM ECOMMERCE OR MOBILE ADVERTISING. CHILE APP ANNIE’S RANKING OF MOBILE APPS AND MOBILE GAMES BY TOTAL CONSUMER SPEND BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021 APP ANNIE APP RANKING: CONSUMER SPEND FEB 2022
ECOMMERCE
64 70.6% 77.4% 30.8% 28.8% 58.0% 61.8% 16.1% 21.5% 61.4% 69.8% 19.4% 26.8% 24.9% 31.5% 20.6% 27.0% 65.4% 22.9% 28.0% 23.6% 73.8% 29.8% 59.8% 18.7% FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE MADE OR RECEIVED DIGITAL PAYMENTS IN THE PAST YEAR MADE A PURCHASE ON THE INTERNET IN THE PAST YEAR USED ONLINE BANKING IN THE PAST YEAR USED THE INTERNET TO PAY BILLS IN THE PAST YEAR FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE ACCOUNT WITH A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION CREDIT CARD OWNERSHIP DEBIT CARD OWNERSHIP MOBILE MONEY ACCOUNT (E.G. MPESA, GCASH) SOURCE: WORLD BANK. NOTES: SOME FIGURES HAVE NOT BEEN UPDATED IN THE PAST YEAR, SO MAY BE LESS REPRESENTATIVE OF CURRENT BEHAVIOURS. PERCENTAGES ARE OF ADULTS AGED 15 AND ABOVE, NOT OF TOTAL POPULATION. MOBILE MONEY ACCOUNTS ONLY REFER TO SERVICES THAT STORE FUNDS IN AN ELECTRONIC WALLET LINKED DIRECTLY TO A PHONE NUMBER, SUCH AS MPESA, GCASH, AND TIGO PESA. FIGURES FOR MOBILE MONEY ACCOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE PEOPLE WHO USE β€˜OVER-THE-TOP’ MOBILE PAYMENT SERVICES SUCH AS APPLE PAY, GOOGLE PAY, OR SAMSUNG PAY. CHILE PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT OWNS OR USES EACH PRODUCT OR SERVICE FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORS FEB 2022
65 12.05 $7.64 $634 36.2% MILLION BILLION +7.5% (+837 THOUSAND) +39.6% (+$2.2 BILLION) +29.9% (+$146) +4.8% (+165 BPS) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE PURCHASING CONSUMER GOODS VIA THE INTERNET TOTAL ANNUAL SPEND ON ONLINE CONSUMER GOODS PURCHASES (USD) AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE PER CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE USER (USD) SHARE OF CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE SPEND ATTRIBUTABLE TO PURCHASES MADE VIA MOBILE PHONES SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: β€œCONSUMER GOODS” INCLUDE: ELECTRONICS, FASHION, FURNITURE, TOYS, HOBBY, DIY, BEAUTY, CONSUMER HEALTHCARE, PERSONAL CARE, HOUSEHOLD CARE, FOOD, BEVERAGES, AND PHYSICAL MEDIA. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE HEADLINES FOR THE ADOPTION AND USE OF CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE (B2C ONLY) OVERVIEW OF CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE FEB 2022
66 $336.0 $236.5 $110.9 $226.1 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION +33.1% (+$84 MILLION) +70.0% (+$97 MILLION) +31.3% (+$26 MILLION) +20.1% (+$38 MILLION) $3.29 $1.29 $1.11 $1.04 BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION +54.0% (+$1.2 BILLION) +28.6% (+$286 MILLION) +21.7% (+$199 MILLION) +37.5% (+$284 MILLION) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE PERSONAL & HOUSEHOLD CARE FOOD BEVERAGES PHYSICAL MEDIA YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE ELECTRONICS FASHION FURNITURE TOYS, HOBBY, DIY SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR REVENUES FOR 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. THE β€œPERSONAL & HOUSEHOLD CARE” CATEGORY INCLUDES BEAUTY AND CONSUMER HEALTHCARE. THE β€œPHYSICAL MEDIA” CATEGORY DOES NOT INCLUDE DIGITAL DOWNLOADS OR STREAMING. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE ANNUAL SPEND IN EACH CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE CATEGORY (U.S. DOLLARS, B2C ONLY) ECOMMERCE: CONSUMER GOODS CATEGORIES FEB 2022
67 01 FALABELLA 100 02 NIKE 74 03 RIPLEY 65 04 SAMSUNG 62 05 ZAPATILLAS MUJER 53 06 MERCADO LIBRE 48 07 LIDER 48 08 SODIMAC 47 09 IPHONE 46 10 PARIS 40 11 ADIDAS 38 12 EASY 34 13 ZAPATILLAS HOMBRE 33 14 COMEDOR 26 15 HUAWEI 24 16 ESCRITORIO 23 17 NOTEBOOK 22 18 ZAPATILLAS NIKE 21 19 HITES 21 20 LA POLAR 21 # SEARCH QUERY INDEX # SEARCH QUERY INDEX SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, BASED ON GOOGLE SHOPPING SEARCHES CONDUCTED BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021. NOTES: ANY SPELLING ERRORS OR LANGUAGE INCONSISTENCIES IN SEARCH QUERIES ARE AS PUBLISHED BY GOOGLE TRENDS, AND ARE SHOWN β€œAS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CHANGES IN HOW PEOPLE USE LANGUAGE IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS. GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH ABSOLUTE SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE β€œINDEX vs. TOP QUERY” COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE SEARCH VOLUMES FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED WITH THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY. ADVISORY: GOOGLE TRENDS USES DYNAMIC SAMPLING, SO RANK ORDER AND INDEX VALUES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON WHEN THE TOOL IS ACCESSED, EVEN FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD. CHILE QUERIES WITH THE GREATEST VOLUME OF GOOGLE SHOPPING SEARCH ACTIVITY BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021 TOP GOOGLE SHOPPING QUERIES FEB 2022
68 $295.9 $349.1 $185.2 $1.57 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION +43% (+$89 MILLION) +71% (+$145 MILLION) +33% (+$46 MILLION) +89% (+$737 THOUSAND) $774.5 $174.0 $4.98 $77.75 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION +49% (+$254 MILLION) +109% (+$91 MILLION) +39% (+$1.4 MILLION) +6.4% (+$4.7 MILLION) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE HOTELS PACKAGE HOLIDAYS VACATION RENTALS CRUISES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE FLIGHTS CAR RENTALS TRAINS LONG-DISTANCE BUSES SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK; STATISTA MOBILITY MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR REVENUES FOR 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. VALUES DO NOT INCLUDE REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH PUBLIC TRANSPORT, NON-COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS, FERRIES, TAXIS, RIDE-SHARING, RIDE-HAILING, OR CHAUFFEUR SERVICES. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE ANNUAL SPEND ON ONLINE TRAVEL AND TOURISM SERVICES (U.S. DOLLARS) ONLINE TRAVEL AND TOURISM FEB 2022
69 $649.5 $258.0 $232.9 $70.22 $88.34 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION +26.7% (+$137 MILLION) +25.6% (+$53 MILLION) +26.8% (+$49 MILLION) +25.5% (+$14 MILLION) +30.5% (+$21 MILLION) TOTAL VIDEO GAMES VIDEO-ON-DEMAND EPUBLISHING DIGITAL MUSIC YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR SPEND IN 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. INCLUDES CONTENT DOWNLOADS AND SUBSCRIPTIONS TO STREAMING SERVICES AND ONLINE PUBLISHERS. DOES NOT INCLUDE PHYSICAL MEDIA OR USER-GENERATED CONTENT. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE ANNUAL SPEND ON DIGITAL MEDIA DOWNLOADS AND SUBSCRIPTIONS DIGITAL MEDIA SPEND FEB 2022
70 4.53 +21.9% $218.4 +32.0% $48.20 MILLION +814 THOUSAND MILLION +$53 MILLION YOY: +8.3% NUMBER OF PEOPLE ORDERING FOOD DELIVERY VIA ONLINE PLATFORMS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY USERS TOTAL ANNUAL VALUE OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY ORDERS (USD) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE VALUE OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY ORDERS AVERAGE ANNUAL VALUE OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY ORDERS PER USER (USD) SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. ONLY INCLUDES ORDERS MADE VIA ONLINE SERVICES. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE HEADLINES FOR THE ADOPTION AND USE OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY SERVICES ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY OVERVIEW FEB 2022
71 12.13 +7.5% $12.01 +47.7% $991 MILLION +850 THOUSAND BILLION +$3.9 BILLION YOY: +37% NUMBER OF PEOPLE MAKING DIGITAL PAYMENTS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE MAKING DIGITAL PAYMENTS TOTAL ANNUAL VALUE OF DIGITAL PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS (USD) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE VALUE OF DIGITAL PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS AVERAGE ANNUAL VALUE OF DIGITAL PAYMENTS PER USER (USD) SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: β€œDIGITAL PAYMENTS” INCLUDE MOBILE P.O.S. PAYMENTS (E.G. PAYMENTS VIA APPLE PAY OR SAMSUNG PAY), B2C DIGITAL COMMERCE, AND B2C DIGITAL REMITTANCES. VALUES DO NOT INCLUDE B2B TRANSACTIONS. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR FOR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE HEADLINES FOR THE ADOPTION AND USE OF DIGITALLY ENABLED PAYMENT SERVICES BY END CONSUMERS OVERVIEW OF CONSUMER DIGITAL PAYMENTS FEB 2022
DIGITAL MARKETING
73 $521.4 $140.2 $235.8 $128.5 $16.95 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION +37.0% (+$141 MILLION) +47.0% (+$45 MILLION) +29.8% (+$54 MILLION) +45.0% (+$40 MILLION) +13.7% (+$2.0 MILLION) TOTAL SEARCH ADS BANNER ADS VIDEO ADS CLASSIFIEDS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR SPEND IN 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. DOES NOT INCLUDE ADVERTISING REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMAIL MARKETING, AUDIO ADS, INFLUENCER MARKETING, SPONSORSHIPS, PRODUCT PLACEMENT, OR COMMISSION-BASED AFFILIATE SYSTEMS. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE ANNUAL SPEND ON DIGITAL ADVERTISING, WITH DETAIL BY ADVERTISING FORMAT (U.S. DOLLARS) VALUE OF THE DIGITAL ADVERTISING MARKET FEB 2022
74 46.5% -2.2% $242.6 +34.0% -105 BPS MILLION +$62 MILLION SOCIAL MEDIA’S SHARE OF TOTAL DIGITAL ADVERTISING SPEND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN SOCIAL MEDIA’S SHARE OF TOTAL DIGITAL ADVERTISING SPEND ANNUAL SPEND ON SOCIAL MEDIA ADVERTISING (USD) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN SOCIAL MEDIA ADVERTISING SPEND SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. DOES NOT INCLUDE ADVERTISING REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMAIL MARKETING, AUDIO ADS, INFLUENCER MARKETING, SPONSORSHIPS, PRODUCT PLACEMENT, OR COMMISSION-BASED AFFILIATE SYSTEMS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE SOCIAL MEDIA’S SHARE OF THE DIGITAL ADVERTISING MARKET SOCIAL MEDIA ADVERTISING OVERVIEW FEB 2022
75 79.9% +1.0% $416.5 +38.5% +82 BPS MILLION +$116 MILLION PROGRAMMATIC’S SHARE OF TOTAL DIGITAL ADVERTISING SPEND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN PROGRAMMATIC’S SHARE OF TOTAL DIGITAL ADVERTISING SPEND ANNUAL SPEND ON PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING (USD) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING SPEND (USD) SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. DOES NOT INCLUDE ADVERTISING REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMAIL MARKETING, AUDIO ADS, INFLUENCER MARKETING, SPONSORSHIPS, PRODUCT PLACEMENT, OR COMMISSION-BASED AFFILIATE SYSTEMS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE SHARE OF DIGITAL ADVERTISING FULFILLED VIA PROGRAMMATIC TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING OVERVIEW FEB 2022
MORE INFORMATION
DATAREPORTAL.COM/LIBRARY FIND THOUSANDS OF REPORTS EXPLORING DIGITAL TRENDS IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD IN OUR FREE ONLINE LIBRARY:
_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL 2022_ DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022 _DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL 2022_ DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022 We are a global socially-led creative agency, with unrivaled social media expertise. With 1,000+ people in 15 offices spanning four continents, we deliver a global perspective to our clients in a time when social media is shaping culture. We make ideas powered by people. We understand social behaviours within online communities, cultures and subcultures, spanning the social and gaming landscape. We work with the world’s biggest brands, including adidas, Samsung, Netflix and Google, to reach the right people in a strategic, relevant and effective way. wearesocial.com A B O U T W E A R E S O C I A L
Learn more at kepios.com LEARN MORE Β» LEARN MORE Β» LEARN MORE Β» LEARN MORE Β» LEARN MORE Β» Go beyond headlines and hypotheses to understand what people are really doing online, and turn insights into actionable plans and results. We research and produce white-label content and co- branded reports that offer rich insights into what people everywhere are doing online. Add our team’s experience and insight to your decision- making. Available through regular, retained advisory, or ad hoc for one-off sessions. Custom keynote presentations that bring the latest digital trends to life at conferences, events, and private meetings, whether online or in person. Interactive briefings that make it easy to keep track of digital trends, and identify how evolving behaviours will impact future success. CONSUMER RESEARCH REPORTS & CONTENT ADVISORY SERVICES KEYNOTE PRESENTATIONS DIGITAL BRIEFINGS In addition to producing the Global Digital Reports, we also offer: Kepios helps the world understand what’s really happening online. MAKE SENSE OF DIGITAL TRENDS
Diversity of industries and topics Statista bundles statistical data on over 80,000 topics from over 170 industries. The data comes from over 22,500 sources. Quick help for all cases With Statista, users can obtain comprehensive overviews and conduct targeted research – with minimal time expenditure. Global data from numerous countries Statista offers insights and facts on industries from 150+ countries. Markets, companies and consumers from all over the world are highlighted. Reliable and efficient research basis Statista has been the market leader in providing business data for 13 years. Companies, universities, schools and the media trust our service. CLICK HERE TO DISCOVER OUR ACCOUNTS AND FIND DATA FOR YOUR BUSINESS COSMOS Statista – a universe of data
Extensive Datasets We provide data on every mobile operator in every country worldwide, with over 30 million data points, updated daily. Annually, GSMA Intelligence publishes over 100 reports and exclusive analyses, adding greater insight into our data and supporting our customers in making stronger business choices. Our forecasting experts provide a five-year (and beyond) view into the future, enabling long-term investment planning. Updated quarterly, our forecasts are consistently accurate within +/- 2.5 % of reported data. Topical and Timely Research Pinpoint Accuracy We serve a wide array of industries in the mobile ecosystem and beyond, including most of the world’s mobile operators plus major vendors, regulators, international institutions and vertical sectors ranging from automotive to retail. Industry Trusted 3 Global Offices Delhi Barcelona London Serves over 800 organisations 40,000 users worldwide Definitive data and analysis for the mobile industry
Semrush .Trends Data. Insights. Impact. Semrush .Trends provides instant market overview and competitive digital insights for those who are looking to grow their business. It enables an in-depth view of market conditions and trends for creating a growth-driven marketing strategy. All-encompassing insights for any website, industry or market across 190 countries & regions A single solution with 50+ tools for your strategic vision Accurate data for real-time market and competitive insights
Digital 2022 Chile (February 2022) v01
Similarweb provides insights for any website, app, industry and market Websites 100M+ Apps 4.7M+ Countries 190+ Industries 210+ Search Terms 1B+ E-commerce product SKUs 250M+
Digital 2022 Chile (February 2022) v01
Prior to our Digital 2021 reports, we included data sourced from social media platforms’ self-service advertising tools in our calculations of internet user numbers, but we no longer include this data in our internet user figures. This is because the user numbers reported by social media platforms are typically based on active user accounts, and may not represent unique individuals. For example, one person may maintain more than one active presence (account) on the same social media platform. Similarly, some accounts may represent β€˜non-human’ entities, including: pets and animals; historical figures; businesses, causes, groups, and organisations; places of interest; etc. As a result, the figures we report for social media users may exceed internet user numbers. However, while this may seem counter-intuitive or surprising, such instances do not represent errors in the data or in our reporting. Rather, these differences may indicate delays in the reporting of internet user numbers, or they may indicate higher instances of individuals managing multiple social media accounts, or β€˜non-human’ social media accounts. If you have any questions about specific data points in these reports, or if you’d like to offer your organisation’s data for consideration in future reports, please email our reports team: reports@kepios.com. footnotes of each relevant chart, but please use caution when comparing data from different reports, because changes to research samples, base data, research methodologies, and approaches to reporting may mean that values are not comparable. Furthermore, due to the differing data collection and treatment methodologies, and the different periods during which data have been collected, there may be significant differences in the reported metrics for similar data points throughout this report. For example, data from surveys often varies over time, even if that data has been collected by the same organisation using the same approach in each wave of their research. In particular, reports of internet user numbers vary considerably between different sources and over time. In part, this is because there are significant challenges associated with collecting, analysing, and publishing internet user data on a regular basis, not least because research into public internet use necessitates the use of face-to-face surveys. Different organisations may also adopt different approaches to sampling the population for research into internet use, and variations in areas such as the age range of the survey population, or the balance between urban and rural respondents, may play an important role in determining eventual findings. Note that COVID-19 has limited internet user research. Note: This page is a summary of our comprehensive notes on data variance, potential mismatches, and curiosities, which you can read in full at https://datareportal.com/notes-on-data. This report features data from a wide variety of different sources, including market research agencies, internet and social media companies, governments, public bodies, news media, and private individuals, as well as extrapolations and analysis of that data. Wherever possible, we’ve prioritised data sources that provide broader geographical coverage, in order to minimise potential variations between data points, and to offer more reliable comparison across countries. However, where we believe that standalone metrics provide a more reliable reference, we use such standalone numbers to ensure more accurate reporting. Please note that some data points may only be available for a limited selection of countries, so we may not be able to report the same data in all reports. From time to time, we may also change the source(s) that we use to inform specific data points. As a result, some figures may appear to change in unexpected ways from one report to another. Wherever we’re aware of these changes, we include details in the NOTES ON DATA VARIANCE, MISMATCHES, AND CURIOSITIES
anyone else for any direct, indirect, punitive, incidental, special, consequential, exemplary or similar loss or damage, or loss or damage of any kind, suffered by you or anyone else as a result of any use, action or decision taken by you or anyone else in any way connected to this report or the information contained herein, or the result(s) thereof, even if advised of the possibility of such loss or damage. This report may contain reference to third- party data providers, however this report does not endorse any such third parties or their products or services, nor is this report sponsored by, endorsed by or associated with such third parties. Except for those portions of this report relating to the perspectives of We Are Social, this report and any opinions contained herein have been prepared by Kepios, and have not been specifically approved or disapproved by We Are Social. This report is subject to change without notice. To ensure you have the most recent version of this report, please visit our website at https://datareportal.com/. This report contains data, tables, figures, maps, flags, analyses and technical notes that relate to various geographical territories around the world, however reference to these territories and any associated elements (including names and flags) does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Kepios, We Are Social, or any of the featured brands, nor any of those organisations’ partners, affiliates, employees or agents, concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This report is provided with the understanding that it does not constitute professional advice or services of any kind and should therefore not be substituted for independent investigations, thought or judgment. Accordingly, neither Kepios, nor We Are Social, nor any of the brands and organisations featured or cited herein, nor any of their partners, affiliates, group companies, employees or agents shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be liable to you or This report has been compiled by Kepios Pte. Ltd. (β€œKepios”) on behalf of We Are Social Ltd. (β€œWe Are Social”) for informational purposes only, and relies on data from a wide variety of sources, including but not limited to public and private companies, market research firms, government agencies, NGOs, and private individuals. While Kepios and We Are Social strive to ensure that all data and charts contained in this report are, as at the time of publishing, accurate and up-to-date, neither Kepios, nor We Are Social, nor any of the other featured brands and organisations shall be responsible for any errors or omissions contained in this report, or for the results obtained from its use. All information contained in this report is provided β€œas is”, with no guarantee whatsoever of its accuracy, completeness, correctness or non-infringement of third- party rights and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including without limitation, warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. DISCLAIMER AND IMPORTANT NOTES
DATAREPORTAL.COM REPORTS@KEPIOS.COM @ESKIMON SIMON KEMP

More Related Content

PDF
Digital 2022 Costa Rica (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Ecuador (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Guatemala (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Panama (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Argentina (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Venezuela (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Australia (February 2022) v02
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Spain (February 2022) v02
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Costa Rica (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Ecuador (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Guatemala (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Panama (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Argentina (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Venezuela (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Australia (February 2022) v02
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Spain (February 2022) v02
DataReportal
Β 

What's hot (20)

PDF
Digital 2022 Gabon (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Paraguay (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 South Korea (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 New Zealand (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2021 Turkey (January 2021) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Netherlands (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Canada (February 2022) v02
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022: Essential Snapchat Stats for Q1 2022 v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Jamaica (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Sweden (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Moldova (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Peru (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Ukraine (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Dominican Republic (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022: Essential LinkedIn Stats for Q1 2022 v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Germany (February 2022) v02
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Nicaragua (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022: Essential TikTok Stats for Q3 2022 v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Wallis and Futuna (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022: Essential Facebook Messenger Stats for Q1 2022 v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Gabon (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Paraguay (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 South Korea (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 New Zealand (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2021 Turkey (January 2021) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Netherlands (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Canada (February 2022) v02
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022: Essential Snapchat Stats for Q1 2022 v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Jamaica (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Sweden (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Moldova (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Peru (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Ukraine (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Dominican Republic (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022: Essential LinkedIn Stats for Q1 2022 v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Germany (February 2022) v02
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Nicaragua (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022: Essential TikTok Stats for Q3 2022 v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Wallis and Futuna (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022: Essential Facebook Messenger Stats for Q1 2022 v01
DataReportal
Β 
Ad

Similar to Digital 2022 Chile (February 2022) v01 (20)

PDF
Digital 2022 Israel (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Uruguay (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Jordan (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Jersey (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Guinea (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Reunion (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Georgia (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Bahrain (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Guam (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Belize (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 India (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Bolivia (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Czechia (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Chad (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Grenada (February 2022) v02
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Nauru (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Hungary (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Guyana (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Palau (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2022 Andorra (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Israel (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Uruguay (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Jordan (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Jersey (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Guinea (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Reunion (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Georgia (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Bahrain (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Guam (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Belize (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 India (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Bolivia (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Czechia (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Chad (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Grenada (February 2022) v02
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Nauru (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Hungary (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Guyana (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Palau (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2022 Andorra (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Ad

More from DataReportal (20)

PDF
Digital 2023 April Global Statshot Report v01 (April 2023)
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Global Overview Report (Summary Version) (January 2023) v02
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Libya (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Zimbabwe (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Zambia (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Western Sahara (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Wallis and Futuna (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Vanuatu (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 United States Virgin Islands (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Tuvalu (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Turks and Caicos Islands (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Turkmenistan (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Trinidad and Tobago (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Tonga (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Togo (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Timor-Leste (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Tajikistan (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Suriname (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 South Sudan (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
PDF
Digital 2023 Somalia (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 April Global Statshot Report v01 (April 2023)
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Global Overview Report (Summary Version) (January 2023) v02
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Libya (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Zimbabwe (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Zambia (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Western Sahara (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Wallis and Futuna (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Vanuatu (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 United States Virgin Islands (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Tuvalu (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Turks and Caicos Islands (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Turkmenistan (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Trinidad and Tobago (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Tonga (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Togo (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Timor-Leste (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Tajikistan (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Suriname (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 South Sudan (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 
Digital 2023 Somalia (February 2023) v01
DataReportal
Β 

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Introduction to Information and Communication Technology
AkmadArzieAyao1
Β 
PDF
Cloud-Scale Log Monitoring _ Datadog.pdf
MuhammadDhomanhuriMa
Β 
PDF
The Internet -By the Numbers, Sri Lanka Edition
APNIC
Β 
PDF
Best Practices for Testing and Debugging Shopify Third-Party API Integrations...
CartCoders
Β 
PDF
Triggering QUIC, presented by Geoff Huston at IETF 123
APNIC
Β 
PDF
Sims 4 Historia para lo sims 4 para jugar
lolpopy34
Β 
PDF
Slides PDF The World Game (s) Eco Economic Epochs.pdf
Steven McGee
Β 
PPTX
presentation_pfe-universite-molay-seltan.pptx
yahyamohibme
Β 
PPT
Design_with_Watersergyerge45hrbgre4top (1).ppt
DiogoRibeiro730590
Β 
PDF
WebRTC in SignalWire - troubleshooting media negotiation
Giacomo Vacca
Β 
PDF
APNIC Update, presented at PHNOG 2025 by Shane Hermoso
APNIC
Β 
PDF
Tenda Login Guide: Access Your Router in 5 Easy Steps
tendawifi16
Β 
PPTX
June-4-Sermon-Powerpoint.pptx USE THIS FOR YOUR MOTIVATION
KuyaRogie
Β 
PPTX
Introuction about WHO-FIC in ICD-10.pptx
naveenithkrishnan
Β 
PDF
RPKI Status Update, presented by Makito Lay at IDNOG 10
APNIC
Β 
PDF
πŸ’° π”πŠπ“πˆ πŠπ„πŒπ„ππ€ππ†π€π πŠπˆππ„π‘πŸ’πƒ π‡π€π‘πˆ 𝐈𝐍𝐈 πŸπŸŽπŸπŸ“ πŸ’°
GRAB
Β 
PPTX
Internet___Basics___Styled_ presentation
poonam62133
Β 
PDF
An introduction to the IFRS (ISSB) Stndards.pdf
farhankhan13694
Β 
PPTX
INTERNET------BASICS-------UPDATED PPT PRESENTATION
poonam62133
Β 
PPTX
artificial intelligence overview of it and more
yafotin445
Β 
Introduction to Information and Communication Technology
AkmadArzieAyao1
Β 
Cloud-Scale Log Monitoring _ Datadog.pdf
MuhammadDhomanhuriMa
Β 
The Internet -By the Numbers, Sri Lanka Edition
APNIC
Β 
Best Practices for Testing and Debugging Shopify Third-Party API Integrations...
CartCoders
Β 
Triggering QUIC, presented by Geoff Huston at IETF 123
APNIC
Β 
Sims 4 Historia para lo sims 4 para jugar
lolpopy34
Β 
Slides PDF The World Game (s) Eco Economic Epochs.pdf
Steven McGee
Β 
presentation_pfe-universite-molay-seltan.pptx
yahyamohibme
Β 
Design_with_Watersergyerge45hrbgre4top (1).ppt
DiogoRibeiro730590
Β 
WebRTC in SignalWire - troubleshooting media negotiation
Giacomo Vacca
Β 
APNIC Update, presented at PHNOG 2025 by Shane Hermoso
APNIC
Β 
Tenda Login Guide: Access Your Router in 5 Easy Steps
tendawifi16
Β 
June-4-Sermon-Powerpoint.pptx USE THIS FOR YOUR MOTIVATION
KuyaRogie
Β 
Introuction about WHO-FIC in ICD-10.pptx
naveenithkrishnan
Β 
RPKI Status Update, presented by Makito Lay at IDNOG 10
APNIC
Β 
πŸ’° π”πŠπ“πˆ πŠπ„πŒπ„ππ€ππ†π€π πŠπˆππ„π‘πŸ’πƒ π‡π€π‘πˆ 𝐈𝐍𝐈 πŸπŸŽπŸπŸ“ πŸ’°
GRAB
Β 
Internet___Basics___Styled_ presentation
poonam62133
Β 
An introduction to the IFRS (ISSB) Stndards.pdf
farhankhan13694
Β 
INTERNET------BASICS-------UPDATED PPT PRESENTATION
poonam62133
Β 
artificial intelligence overview of it and more
yafotin445
Β 

Digital 2022 Chile (February 2022) v01

  • 1. THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO THE LATEST CONNECTED BEHAVIOURS DIGITAL 2022 CHILE
  • 3. APP ANNIE SIMILARWEB LOCOWISE SKAI GWI STATISTA GSMA INTELLIGENCE SEMRUSH PARTNERS THAT MAKE THE GLOBAL DIGITAL REPORTS SERIES POSSIBLE
  • 4. DATAREPORTAL.COM/LIBRARY FIND THOUSANDS OF REPORTS EXPLORING DIGITAL TRENDS IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD IN OUR FREE ONLINE LIBRARY:
  • 5. ! The findings published in this report use the latest data available at the time of production. This may include revised figures for historical data points that were not available when we published previous reports in the Global Digital Reports series. From time to time, we may also change the data sources that we use to inform specific data points, and we may also change how we calculate certain values. Similarly, our data partners may change the ways in which they source, calculate, or report the data that they share with us. As a result, findings published in this report may not correlate with findings published in our previous reports, especially where such findings represent change over time (e.g. annual growth). Where we report figures for change over time, such figures will use the latest available data, so we recommend using the values published in this report, rather than trying to recalculate such values using data from previous reports. Wherever we’re aware of the potential for historical mismatches, we’ve included a note on comparability in the footnotes of each relevant slide. Please read these advisories carefully to understand how data sources or calculations have changed since previous reports, and beware of making any comparisons with historical data. In addition to changes in data sources and calculations, please note that social media user numbers may not represent unique individuals. This is because some people may manage multiple social media accounts, and because some social media accounts may represent β€˜non-human’ entities (e.g. businesses, animals, bands, etc.). As a result, the figures we publish for social media users may exceed the figures we publish for total population or for internet users. This may seem counter-intuitive, but such differences do not represent mistakes. For more information, please read our notes on data variance, mismatches, and curiosities: https://datareportal.com/notes-on-data. IMPORTANT NOTES ON COMPARING DATA
  • 7. 7 7.91 8.28 4.95 4.62 BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION +1.0% +2.9% +4.0% +10.1% 57.0% 104.6% 62.5% 58.4% TOTAL POPULATION MOBILE CONNECTIONS INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE URBANISATION TOTAL vs. POPULATION TOTAL vs. POPULATION TOTAL vs. POPULATION SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; GOVERNMENT BODIES; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; ITU; GWI; EUROSTAT; CNNIC; APJII; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND EARNINGS REPORTS; OCDH; TECHRASA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. GLOBAL OVERVIEW GLOBAL OVERVIEW OVERVIEW OF THE ADOPTION AND USE OF CONNECTED DEVICES AND SERVICES AT A WORLDWIDE LEVEL GLOBAL DIGITAL HEADLINES FEB 2022
  • 8. 8 OCEANIA SOUTH-EASTERN ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA EASTERN ASIA CENTRAL ASIA WESTERN ASIA SOUTHERN AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA EASTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE NORTHERN EUROPE WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN AMERICA CARIBBEAN CENTRAL AMERICA NORTHERN AMERICA 73% 72% 73% 46% 66% 66% 26% 24% 42% 63% 86% 87% 98% 94% 75% 66% 70% 92% 72% SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; UNITED NATIONS. NOTE: REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. GLOBAL OVERVIEW INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION INTERNET ADOPTION FEB 2022
  • 9. 9 OCEANIA SOUTH-EASTERN ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA EASTERN ASIA CENTRAL ASIA WESTERN ASIA SOUTHERN AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA EASTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE NORTHERN EUROPE WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN AMERICA CARIBBEAN CENTRAL AMERICA NORTHERN AMERICA 0.6% 9.8% 24.7% 18.1% 1.0% 0.9% 2.5% 0.9% 3.6% 3.2% 5.1% 2.7% 2.1% 3.7% 6.6% 0.6% 2.6% 7.0% 4.2% SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. NOTES: FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. GLOBAL OVERVIEW INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL GLOBAL INTERNET USERS SHARE OF GLOBAL INTERNET USERS FEB 2022
  • 10. 10 OCEANIA SOUTH-EASTERN ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA EASTERN ASIA CENTRAL ASIA WESTERN ASIA SOUTHERN AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA EASTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE NORTHERN EUROPE WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN AMERICA CARIBBEAN CENTRAL AMERICA NORTHERN AMERICA 66% 72% 69% 34% 33% 70% 45% 10% 8% 16% 56% 70% 76% 85% 84% 79% 55% 73% 82% SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS; CNNIC; TECHRASA; OCDH. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. NOTES: DOES NOT INCLUDE DATA FOR SUDAN OR SYRIA. REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE, BASE, AND METHODOLOGY CHANGES, INCLUDING SIGNIFICANT SOURCE DATA REVISIONS AND CHANGES IN REPORTING APPROACHES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH THOSE PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS. FIGURES FOR LOCAL AND REGIONAL SOCIAL MEDIA USE RELY ON DIFFERENT DATASETS TO GLOBAL FIGURES. GLOBAL OVERVIEW ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION (NOTE: USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) SOCIAL MEDIA USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION FEB 2022
  • 11. 11 OCEANIA SOUTH-EASTERN ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA EASTERN ASIA CENTRAL ASIA WESTERN ASIA SOUTHERN AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA EASTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE NORTHERN EUROPE WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN AMERICA CARIBBEAN CENTRAL AMERICA NORTHERN AMERICA 0.7% 11.6% 27.6% 15.7% 0.6% 4.5% 0.7% 1.1% 0.3% 1.6% 2.8% 4.9% 2.8% 2.1% 3.9% 8.2% 0.6% 3.2% 7.2% SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS; CNNIC; TECHRASA; OCDH. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. NOTES: FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. DOES NOT INCLUDE DATA FOR SUDAN OR SYRIA. REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE, BASE, AND METHODOLOGY CHANGES, INCLUDING SIGNIFICANT SOURCE DATA REVISIONS AND CHANGES IN REPORTING APPROACHES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH THOSE PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS. FIGURES FOR LOCAL AND REGIONAL SOCIAL MEDIA USE RELY ON DIFFERENT DATASETS TO GLOBAL FIGURES. GLOBAL OVERVIEW ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS IN EACH REGION AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL GLOBAL ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS SHARE OF GLOBAL SOCIAL MEDIA USERS FEB 2022
  • 12. 12 OCEANIA SOUTH-EASTERN ASIA SOUTHERN ASIA EASTERN ASIA CENTRAL ASIA WESTERN ASIA SOUTHERN AFRICA EASTERN AFRICA MIDDLE AFRICA WESTERN AFRICA NORTHERN AFRICA EASTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN EUROPE NORTHERN EUROPE WESTERN EUROPE SOUTHERN AMERICA CARIBBEAN CENTRAL AMERICA NORTHERN AMERICA 104% 137% 116% 87% 105% 174% 67% 55% 95% 102% 147% 127% 116% 124% 110% 79% 98% 105% 98% SOURCES: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; UNITED NATIONS. NOTE: FIGURES MAY EXCEED 100% BECAUSE SOME INDIVIDUALS MAY USE MORE THAN ONE CELLULAR CONNECTION. REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. GLOBAL OVERVIEW CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS COMPARED WITH TOTAL POPULATION MOBILE CONNECTIVITY FEB 2022
  • 13. ESSENTIAL DATA FOR DIGITAL ADOPTION AND USE IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD DIGITAL 2022 LOCAL COUNTRY HEADLINES REPORT THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO THE WORLD’S CONNECTED BEHAVIOURS GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT DIGITAL 2022 CLICK HERE TO READ OUR DIGITAL 2022 LOCAL COUNTRY HEADLINES REPORT, WITH ESSENTIAL STATS FOR DIGITAL ADOPTION IN EVERY COUNTRY AROUND THE WORLD CLICK HERE TO READ OUR FLAGSHIP DIGITAL 2022 GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT, PACKED WITH ALL THE NUMBERS YOU NEED TO MAKE SENSE OF THE CURRENT STATE OF DIGITAL EXPLORE OUR COMPLETE COLLECTION OF DIGITAL 2022 GLOBAL DATA
  • 14. _DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_ DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022 _DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_ DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022 WE ARE SOCIAL T H I N K F O R W A R D 2 0 2 2 BRAVE NEW WORLDS You’ve heard about the metaverse, right? Actually, 87% of social media users globally haven’t. But does that even matter, when businesses from Facebook to Fortnite are vying to stake their claim in it? What about web3? Or blockchain? Do you know what an NFT is? As we’ve renegotiated our relationship with digital in the wake of Covid-19, from the fringes of the internet, a wealth of new terms have become mainstays in the marketing press and mainstream media alike, rushing to alleviate the tensions of our new reality . We’re at a tipping point, and the gold rush is in full swing. We’re stepping into Brave New Worlds. In the seventh issue of our annual report Think Forward, we unpick the complex and ever-changing web of digital culture and behaviour, and explore the role brands can play in reflecting and shaping it. The report was informed by ongoing intelligence from our global Cultural Insights team, and supported by a survey of 3,000 people aged 18+ who use social media daily from the US, UK, France, Italy, China and Australia. T H E T R E N D S 1. IN-FEED SYLLABUSES SOCIAL IS BEING REPURPOSED AS A SPACE FOR SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING 2. THE VIBE ECONOMY THE CURATION OF MOODS AND FEELINGS HAS BECOME A COVETED CREATIVE SKILL 3. PRIME TIME PLATFORMS SOCIAL HAS LEVELLED UP FROM ITS ROLE AS A SECOND SCREEN 4. SOCIAL CYNICISM CREATORS ARE FIGHTING TO OVERCOME THE TROPES OF SOCIAL 5. NEW MATERIALISTS PEOPLE ARE INVESTING IN DIGITAL CONTENT AND CREATIVITY PARTNER CONTENT
  • 15. CHILE
  • 16. 16 19.23 26.32 17.70 17.85 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION 87.9% 136.9% 92.0% 92.8% URBANISATION vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION TOTAL POPULATION CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; GOVERNMENT BODIES; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; ITU; GWI; EUROSTAT; CNNIC; APJII; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND EARNINGS REPORTS; OCDH; TECHRASA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. CHILE OVERVIEW OF THE ADOPTION AND USE OF CONNECTED DEVICES AND SERVICES ESSENTIAL DIGITAL HEADLINES FEB 2022
  • 17. 17 +0.3% +2.3% [N/A] +11.6% +67 THOUSAND +581 THOUSAND [NEW DATA SOURCE] +1.9 MILLION YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE TOTAL POPULATION CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS INTERNET USERS ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; GOVERNMENT BODIES; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; ITU; GWI; EUROSTAT; CNNIC; APJII; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND EARNINGS REPORTS; OCDH; TECHRASA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: DUE TO COVID-19-RELATED DELAYS IN RESEARCH AND REPORTING, FIGURES FOR INTERNET USER GROWTH MAY UNDER-REPRESENT ACTUAL TRENDS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR MORE DETAILS. SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. CHILE CHANGE IN THE USE OF CONNECTED DEVICES AND SERVICES OVER TIME DIGITAL GROWTH FEB 2022
  • 18. 18 87.9% 25.9 96.4% 96.3% 96.5% 19.23 50.7% 49.3% +0.3% 36.3 MILLION +67 THOUSAND URBAN POPULATION POPULATION DENSITY (PEOPLE PER KM2 ) OVERALL LITERACY (ADULTS AGED 15+) FEMALE LITERACY (ADULTS AGED 15+) MALE LITERACY (ADULTS AGED 15+) TOTAL POPULATION FEMALE POPULATION MALE POPULATION YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN TOTAL POPULATION MEDIAN AGE OF THE POPULATION SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; WORLD BANK; UNESCO; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; OUR WORLD IN DATA; INDEXMUNDI; KNOEMA. CHILE DEMOGRAPHICS AND OTHER KEY INDICATORS POPULATION ESSENTIALS FEB 2022
  • 19. 19 17.3 M 17.5 M 17.7 M 17.9 M 18.1 M 18.3 M 18.6 M 18.8 M 19.0 M 19.2 M 19.2 M +1.0% +1.0% +1.1% +1.3% +1.4% +1.4% +1.3% +1.0% +0.7% +0.3% JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, β€œK” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G. β€œ123 K” = 123,000), β€œM” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND β€œB” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE CHANGES AND BASE REVISIONS. FIGURES MAY NOT CORRELATE WITH VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE TOTAL POPULATION AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE POPULATION OVER TIME FEB 2022 DATAREPORTAL
  • 20. 20 16.0% 14.4% 13.0% 11.4% 13.2% 19.23 5.8% 10.4% 6.5% 9.4% MILLION 65+ 55-64 45-54 35-44 25-34 18-24 13-17 5-12 0-4 POPULATION AGED 25-34 POPULATION AGED 35-44 POPULATION AGED 45-54 POPULATION AGED 55-64 POPULATION AGED 65+ TOTAL POPULATION POPULATION AGED 0-4 POPULATION AGED 5-12 POPULATION AGED 13-17 POPULATION AGED 18-24 SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. CHILE SHARE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION BY AGE GROUP POPULATION BY AGE FEB 2022
  • 22. 22 17.70 92.0% [N/A] 98.9% MILLION [NEW DATA SOURCE] TOTAL INTERNET USERS INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS MOBILE INTERNET PROXY1 : SHARE OF SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACCESSING VIA MOBILE DEVICES SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES; UNITED NATIONS. NOTE: (1) STANDALONE FIGURES FOR MOBILE INTERNET USE WERE UNAVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF REPORT PRODUCTION, BUT THE PERCENTAGE SHARE OF SOCIAL MEDIA USERS ACCESSING SOCIAL PLATFORMS VIA MOBILE DEVICES MAY OFFER A REPRESENTATIVE BENCHMARK FOR MOBILE INTERNET USE. ADVISORY: DUE TO COVID-19-RELATED DELAYS IN RESEARCH AND REPORTING, FIGURES FOR INTERNET USER GROWTH MAY UNDER-REPRESENT ACTUAL TRENDS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR MORE DETAILS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. CHILE ESSENTIAL INDICATORS OF INTERNET ADOPTION AND USE OVERVIEW OF INTERNET USE FEB 2022
  • 23. 23 9.05 M 9.63 M 10.2 M 10.9 M 13.9 M 15.3 M 15.3 M 15.5 M 15.7 M 15.8 M 17.7 M CHANGE IN DATA SOURCE +6.4% +6.4% +6.5% +27.0% +10.6% -0.08% +1.3% +1.0% +0.7% [N/A] JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, β€œK” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G. β€œ123 K” = 123,000), β€œM” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND β€œB” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. ADVISORY: DUE TO COVID-19-RELATED DELAYS IN RESEARCH AND REPORTING, FIGURES FOR INTERNET USER GROWTH AFTER 2020 MAY UNDER-REPRESENT ACTUAL TRENDS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR MORE DETAILS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. FIGURES MAY NOT MATCH OR CORRELATE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE INTERNET USERS OVER TIME NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE FEB 2022 DATAREPORTAL
  • 24. 24 15.83 15.83 14.11 MILLION MILLION MILLION 82.3% 82.3% 73.4% vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION INTERNET USERS: ITU INTERNET USERS: CIA WORLD FACTBOOK INTERNET USERS: INTERNETWORLDSTATS SOURCES: AS STATED ABOVE EACH ICON. NOTES: WHERE SOURCES PUBLISH INTERNET ADOPTION AS A PERCENTAGE (I.E. PENETRATION), WE COMPARE THE LATEST PUBLISHED ADOPTION RATES IN EACH COUNTRY TO OUR LATEST FIGURES FOR POPULATION TO DERIVE ABSOLUTE USER NUMBERS. WHERE SOURCES PUBLISH ABSOLUTE USER NUMBERS, WE COMPARE THESE ABSOLUTE USER FIGURES TO OUR LATEST FIGURES FOR POPULATION TO DERIVE VALUES FOR β€œvs. POPULATION”. COMPARABILITY: POTENTIAL MISMATCHES. INTERNET USER FIGURES QUOTED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT USE DATA FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES, INCLUDING SOURCES NOT FEATURED ON THIS SLIDE. CHILE INTERNET USER NUMBERS PUBLISHED BY DIFFERENT SOURCES INTERNET USER PERSPECTIVES FEB 2022
  • 25. 25 14.15 +17.1% 173.09 +94.8% MBPS +2.07 MBPS MBPS +84.22 MBPS MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEED OF CELLULAR MOBILE INTERNET CONNECTIONS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN MEDIAN CELLULAR MOBILE INTERNET CONNECTION SPEED MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEED OF FIXED INTERNET CONNECTIONS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN MEDIAN FIXED INTERNET CONNECTION SPEED SOURCE: OOKLA. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEEDS IN MEGABITS PER SECOND (MBPS) IN NOVEMBER 2021. COMPARABILITY: THE VALUES FOR INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS THAT WE FEATURED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS REFLECTED MEAN CONNECTION SPEEDS, WHEREAS WE NOW FEATURE MEDIAN CONNECTION SPEEDS, WHICH OFFER A MORE REPRESENTATIVE INDICATION OF THE CONNECTION SPEEDS THAT β€œTYPICAL” USERS CAN EXPECT. AS A RESULT, VALUES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH THE VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEEDS (IN MEGABITS PER SECOND) OF MOBILE AND FIXED INTERNET CONNECTIONS INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS FEB 2022
  • 26. 26 52.47% 46.40% 1.06% 0.06% -4.5% (-247 BPS) +5.7% (+252 BPS) -5.4% (-6 BPS) [UNCHANGED] YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE MOBILE PHONES LAPTOP AND DESKTOP COMPUTERS TABLET DEVICES OTHER DEVICES SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO BROWSERS RUNNING ON EACH TYPE OF DEVICE COMPARED WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO BROWSERS RUNNING ON ANY DEVICE IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. CHILE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS RUNNING ON EACH KIND OF DEVICE SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICE FEB 2022
  • 27. 27 1.99% 4.24% 0.04% 0.83% -20.1% (-50 BPS) +76.7% (+184 BPS) [UNCHANGED] -36.6% (-48 BPS) 78.80% 9.29% 2.75% 2.06% -1.8% (-146 BPS) +1.4% (+13 BPS) +45.5% (+86 BPS) -15.9% (-39 BPS) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE SAMSUNG INTERNET OPERA UC BROWSER OTHER YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE CHROME SAFARI MICROSOFT EDGE FIREFOX SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS SERVED TO EACH BROWSER AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PAGE VIEWS SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS RUNNING ON ANY KIND OF DEVICE IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. CHILE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB PAGES SERVED TO EACH BRAND OF WEB BROWSER RUNNING ON ANY DEVICE SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY BROWSER FEB 2022
  • 28. 28 11 FALABELLA.COM 24.2M 7.28M 12M 28S 4.80 12 EMOL.COM 24.0M 3.57M 14M 37S 2.99 13 LATERCERA.COM 23.9M 6.38M 13M 25S 2.18 14 INSTAGRAM.COM 22.3M 5.20M 19M 24S 4.43 15 REDGOL.CL 21.5M 5.60M 10M 22S 1.62 16 PORNHUB.COM 19.2M 4.16M 13M 43S 7.59 17 LACUARTA.COM 19.0M 4.42M 8M 22S 2.11 18 TRANSBANK.CL 17.9M 5.53M 2M 52S 4.34 19 RIPLEY.CL 15.4M 5.64M 11M 22S 5.80 20 YAPO.CL 15.2M 3.30M 13M 53S 8.71 01 GOOGLE.COM 280M 19.6M 20M 49S 5.34 02 YOUTUBE.COM 88.0M 11.1M 7M 33S 3.51 03 FACEBOOK.COM 58.0M 8.73M 20M 48S 5.98 04 BANCOESTADO.CL 56.3M 9.04M 6M 02S 6.38 05 XVIDEOS.COM 54.2M 6.39M 18M 21S 8.31 06 GOOGLE.CL 51.4M 6.32M 15M 57S 6.11 07 XNXX.COM 40.8M 5.77M 18M 12S 8.14 08 BIOBIOCHILE.CL 37.7M 6.92M 10M 55S 2.21 09 MERCADOLIBRE.CL 35.7M 10.4M 10M 05S 5.39 10 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 31.7M 8.42M 10M 02S 2.02 # WEBSITE TOTAL VISITS UNIQUE VISITORS TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT # WEBSITE TOTAL VISITS UNIQUE VISITORS TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT SOURCE: SEMRUSH. FIGURES REPRESENT TRAFFIC VALUES FOR NOVEMBER 2021. NOTE: β€œUNIQUE VISITORS” REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF DISTINCT β€˜IDENTITIES’ ACCESSING EACH SITE, BUT MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AS SOME PEOPLE MAY USE MULTIPLE DEVICES OR BROWSERS. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE METHODOLOGY CHANGES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES: SEMRUSH RANKING RANKING OF THE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES ACCORDING TO SEMRUSH, BASED ON TOTAL MONTHLY WEBSITE TRAFFIC IN NOVEMBER 2021 FEB 2022
  • 29. 29 01 GOOGLE.COM 65.4% 34.6% 2.41% 0.68% 1.29% 0.11% 0.07% 0.02% 0.16% <0.01% 02 YOUTUBE.COM 18.9% 81.1% 0.58% 0.08% 0.09% 0.19% <0.01% <0.01% 0.04% – 03 FACEBOOK.COM 81.3% 18.7% 0.01% 0.07% 0.22% 0.06% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% 04 BANCOESTADO.CL 81.9% 18.1% 0.21% 0.02% 0.03% 0.02% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% – 05 XVIDEOS.COM 94.2% 5.8% 0.12% <0.01% 0.05% 0.07% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% – 06 GOOGLE.CL 55.3% 44.7% 1.06% 0.07% 0.18% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% 0.03% – 07 XNXX.COM 95.9% 4.1% 0.06% <0.01% 0.03% 0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% – 08 BIOBIOCHILE.CL 90.9% 9.1% 0.46% <0.01% 0.04% 0.98% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% – 09 MERCADOLIBRE.CL 67.2% 32.8% 0.13% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% – 10 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 64.7% 35.3% 0.04% <0.01% 0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% – # WEBSITE SHARE OF TRAFFIC FROM MOBILES SHARE OF TRAFFIC FROM COMPUTERS TRAFFIC FROM FACEBOOK REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM YOUTUBE REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM INSTAGRAM REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM TWITTER REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM LINKEDIN REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM PINTEREST REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM REDDIT REFERRALS TRAFFIC FROM VK REFERRALS SOURCE: SEMRUSH. FIGURES REPRESENT TRAFFIC VALUES FOR NOVEMBER 2021. NOTE: TRAFFIC FROM SOCIAL MEDIA REFERRALS REPRESENT THE SHARE OF TOTAL WEBSITE VISITS THAT ORIGINATED FROM A CLICK OR A TAP ON A LINK PUBLISHED ON THE RESPECTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE METHODOLOGY CHANGES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE SHARE OF WEBSITE TRAFFIC BY DEVICE, AND SHARE OF WEBSITE TRAFFIC REFERRED BY A SELECTION OF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS IN NOVEMBER 2021 TOP WEBSITE TRAFFIC DETAIL (SEMRUSH) FEB 2022
  • 30. 30 11 NETFLIX.COM 396M 5.8% 94.2% 9M 38S 4.15 12 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 377M 55.6% 44.4% 3M 43S 2.66 13 ZOOM.US 347M 34.2% 65.8% 4M 27S 2.92 14 XNXX.COM 342M 97.3% 2.7% 3M 47S 10.83 15 FALABELLA.COM 299M 63.9% 36.1% 6M 56S 5.75 16 EMOL.COM 287M 50.3% 49.7% 5M 50S 2.90 17 LIVE.COM 263M 25.0% 75.0% 8M 12S 7.99 18 CLAVEUNICA.GOB.CL 257M 46.2% 53.8% 3M 16S 2.54 19 BIOBIOCHILE.CL 251M 80.8% 19.2% 4M 47S 2.52 20 TRANSBANK.CL 219M 42.0% 58.0% 4M 09S 7.58 01 GOOGLE.COM 8.78B 51.1% 48.9% 12M 25S 8.85 02 YOUTUBE.COM 3.06B 13.5% 86.5% 24M 05S 13.43 03 FACEBOOK.COM 1.74B 55.1% 44.9% 9M 24S 7.80 04 INSTAGRAM.COM 801M 56.1% 43.9% 10M 01S 13.16 05 GOOGLE.CL 679M 40.0% 60.0% 7M 54S 11.61 06 BANCOESTADO.CL 660M 74.8% 25.2% 4M 39S 7.82 07 WHATSAPP.COM 643M 8.1% 91.9% 3M 37S 1.49 08 TWITTER.COM 546M 52.7% 47.3% 10M 22S 10.56 09 XVIDEOS.COM 539M 92.0% 8.0% 10M 07S 8.29 10 MERCADOLIBRE.CL 401M 45.3% 54.7% 7M 31S 7.92 # WEBSITE TOTAL VISITS MOBILE SHARE DESKTOP SHARE TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT # WEBSITE TOTAL VISITS MOBILE SHARE DESKTOP SHARE TIME PER VISIT PAGES PER VISIT SOURCE: SIMILARWEB. FIGURES REPRESENT TRAFFIC VALUES BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS. CHILE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES: SIMILARWEB RANKING RANKING OF THE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES ACCORDING TO SIMILARWEB, BASED ON ANNUAL WEBSITE TRAFFIC FOR FULL-YEAR 2021 FEB 2022
  • 31. 31 11 BANCOCHILE.CL 06M 53S 5.58 12 INSTAGRAM.COM 09M 00S 11.40 13 ZOOM.US 06M 27S 3.52 14 FALABELLA.COM 06M 07S 4.70 15 EMOL.COM 05M 41S 3.01 16 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 03M 39S 3.05 17 AMAZON.COM 11M 18S 10.22 18 LIVE.COM 05M 24S 5.56 19 NETFLIX.COM 04M 46S 3.61 20 SANTANDER.CL 05M 21S 2.77 01 GOOGLE.COM 17M 26S 18.49 02 YOUTUBE.COM 19M 22S 10.53 03 BIOBIOCHILE.CL 03M 22S 2.20 04 GOOGLE.CL 04M 07S 7.34 05 MERCADOLIBRE.CL 11M 57S 12.40 06 FACEBOOK.COM 17M 46S 8.56 07 LUN.COM 06M 05S 1.70 08 SII.CL 10M 23S 10.60 09 TRANSBANK.CL 01M 55S 5.75 10 BANCOESTADO.CL 05M 10S 6.26 # WEBSITE TIME PER DAY PAGES PER DAY # WEBSITE TIME PER DAY PAGES PER DAY SOURCE: ALEXA INTERNET, USING FIGURES PUBLISHED IN DECEMBER 2021. NOTES: ALEXA INTERNET IS THE NAME OF AMAZON’S INSIGHTS ARM, AND DATA SHOWN HERE ARE NOT RESTRICTED TO ACTIVITIES ON ALEXA VOICE PLATFORMS. β€œTIME PER DAY” FIGURES REPRESENT THE AVERAGE DAILY AMOUNT OF TIME THAT GLOBAL VISITORS SPEND ON EACH DOMAIN, MEASURED IN MINUTES AND SECONDS. β€œPAGES PER DAY” REPRESENT THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF PAGES THAT GLOBAL VISITORS OPEN ON THE DOMAIN EACH DAY. BECAUSE FIGURES FOR β€œTIME PER DAY” AND β€œPAGES PER DAY” REFLECT GLOBAL ACTIVITY, VALUES WILL BE THE SAME ACROSS ALL COUNTRIES. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS. CHILE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES: ALEXA RANKING RANKING OF THE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES ACCORDING TO ALEXA INTERNET, BASED ON TOTAL MONTHLY WEBSITE TRAFFIC FEB 2022
  • 32. 32 0.04% 0.14% 0.09% 0.10% +300% (+3 BPS) +40.0% (+4 BPS) -10.0% (-1 BP) +233% (+7 BPS) 97.09% 1.83% 0% 0.71% -1.2% (-122 BPS) +63.4% (+71 BPS) [UNCHANGED] +115% (+38 BPS) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YANDEX DUCKDUCKGO ECOSIA OTHER YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE GOOGLE BING BAIDU YAHOO! SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF PAGE VIEW REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM EACH SERVICE AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PAGE VIEW REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM SEARCH ENGINES IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. CHILE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB TRAFFIC REFERRED BY SEARCH ENGINES THAT ORIGINATED FROM EACH SEARCH SERVICE SEARCH ENGINE MARKET SHARE FEB 2022
  • 33. 33 01 CHILE 100 02 TIEMPO 39 03 TRADUCTOR 21 04 YOUTUBE 17 05 BANCO ESTADO 15 06 GOOGLE 15 07 WHATSAPP 14 08 FACEBOOK 14 09 IFE 14 10 FALABELLA 13 11 EL TIEMPO 12 12 TIEMPO MAΓ‘ANA 11 13 WHATSAPP WEB 11 14 RIPLEY 9 15 TRADUCTOR ESPAΓ‘OL INGLES 7 16 COLO COLO 7 17 BANCA EN LINEA 7 18 CUENTA RUT 7 19 CHILE VS 6 20 INSTAGRAM 6 # SEARCH QUERY INDEX # SEARCH QUERY INDEX SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, BASED ON SEARCHES CONDUCTED BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021. NOTES: ANY SPELLING ERRORS OR LANGUAGE INCONSISTENCIES IN SEARCH QUERIES ARE AS PUBLISHED BY GOOGLE TRENDS, AND ARE SHOWN β€œAS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CHANGES IN HOW PEOPLE ENTER WRITTEN LANGUAGE IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS. GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH ABSOLUTE SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE β€œINDEX vs. TOP QUERY” COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE SEARCH VOLUMES FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED WITH THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY. ADVISORY: GOOGLE TRENDS USES DYNAMIC SAMPLING, SO RANK ORDER AND INDEX VALUES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON WHEN THE TOOL IS ACCESSED, EVEN FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD. CHILE QUERIES WITH THE GREATEST VOLUME OF GOOGLE SEARCH ACTIVITY BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021 TOP GOOGLE SEARCHES FEB 2022
  • 34. 34 $23.93 $18.64 $8.07 $9.23 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION +47.5% (+$7.7 MILLION) +44.9% (+$5.8 MILLION) +52.1% (+$2.8 MILLION) +58.1% (+$3.4 MILLION) 625.1 $162.6 $78.20 $24.52 THOUSAND MILLION MILLION MILLION +11.0% (+62 THOUSAND) +51.1% (+$55 MILLION) +49.6% (+$26 MILLION) +62.5% (+$9.4 MILLION) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE VALUE OF SMART HOME SECURITY DEVICE MARKET VALUE OF SMART HOME ENTERTAINMENT DEVICE MARKET VALUE OF SMART HOME COMFORT & LIGHTING MARKET VALUE OF SMART HOME ENERGY MANAGEMENT MARKET YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE NUMBER OF HOMES WITH SMART HOME DEVICES TOTAL ANNUAL VALUE OF THE SMART HOME DEVICES MARKET VALUE OF SMART HOME APPLIANCES MARKET VALUE OF SMART HOME CONTROL & CONNECTIVITY DEVICE MARKET SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: β€œSMART HOME DEVICES” INCLUDE: DIGITALLY CONNECTED AND CONTROLLED HOME DEVICES THAT CAN BE REMOTELY CONTROLLED; SENSORS, ACTUATORS AND CLOUD SERVICES THAT ENABLE HOME AUTOMATION; CONTROL HUBS THAT CONNECT SENSORS AND ACTUATORS TO REMOTE CONTROLS AND TO EACH OTHER; AND SMART HOME-RELATED SOFTWARE SALES (INCLUDING SUBSCRIPTION FEES). DOES NOT INCLUDE SMART TVS, OR B2B OR C2C SALES. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR REVENUES FOR 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. CHILE VALUE OF THE MARKET FOR SMART HOME DEVICES (U.S. DOLLARS) SMART HOME MARKET OVERVIEW FEB 2022
  • 35. 35 $83.21 $59.09 $33.59 $50.07 +17.5% (+$12.37) +18.6% (+$9.28) +21.7% (+$5.99) +21.9% (+$9.01) 11.4% $260 $297 $122 +9.7% (+110 BPS) +36.2% (+$69.12) +20.3% (+$50.07) +29.1% (+$27.41) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE ARPU: SMART HOME SECURITY DEVICES ARPU: SMART HOME ENTERTAINMENT DEVICES ARPU: SMART HOME COMFORT & LIGHTING ARPU: SMART HOME ENERGY MANAGEMENT YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE PENETRATION OF SMART HOME DEVICES ARPU: SPEND ON ALL SMART HOME DEVICES ARPU: SMART HOME APPLIANCES ARPU: SMART HOME CONTROL & CONNECTIVITY DEVICES SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: β€œSMART HOME DEVICES” INCLUDE: DIGITALLY CONNECTED AND CONTROLLED HOME DEVICES THAT CAN BE REMOTELY CONTROLLED; SENSORS, ACTUATORS AND CLOUD SERVICES THAT ENABLE HOME AUTOMATION; CONTROL HUBS THAT CONNECT SENSORS AND ACTUATORS TO REMOTE CONTROLS AND TO EACH OTHER; AND SMART HOME-RELATED SOFTWARE SALES (INCLUDING SUBSCRIPTION FEES). DOES NOT INCLUDE SMART TVS, OR B2B OR C2C SALES. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR SPEND PER SMART HOME FOR 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. CHILE AVERAGE ANNUAL SPEND ON SMART HOME DEVICES PER SMART HOME (U.S. DOLLARS) AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE PER SMART HOME FEB 2022
  • 37. 37 +11.6% 50.1% 49.9% +1.9 MILLION 17.85 92.8% 110.8% MILLION YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN SOCIAL MEDIA USERS FEMALE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS vs. TOTAL SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MALE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS vs. TOTAL SOCIAL MEDIA USERS NUMBER OF SOCIAL MEDIA USERS SOCIAL MEDIA USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION SOCIAL MEDIA USERS vs. POPULATION AGE 13+ SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS; CNNIC; TECHRASA; OCDH; U.N.; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR FURTHER DETAILS. CHILE HEADLINES FOR SOCIAL MEDIA ADOPTION AND USE (NOTE: USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS) OVERVIEW OF SOCIAL MEDIA USE FEB 2022
  • 38. 38 10.4 M 10.8 M 11.0 M 13.0 M 14.0 M 14.0 M 15.0 M 16.0 M 17.9 M +3.8% +1.9% +18.2% +7.7% 0% +7.1% +6.7% +11.6% JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, β€œK” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G. β€œ123 K” = 123,000), β€œM” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND β€œB” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: CHANGES TO DATA SOURCES AND SIGNIFICANT BASE REVISIONS IN SOURCE DATA MAY MEAN THAT FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE BETWEEN CERTAIN YEARS. CHILE NUMBER OF SOCIAL MEDIA USERS AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS OVER TIME FEB 2022 DATAREPORTAL
  • 39. 39 2.0% 2.1% 9.9% 10.7% 14.1% 15.8% 9.3% 8.7% 6.8% 6.2% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.4% 13 – 17 YEARS OLD 18 – 24 YEARS OLD 25 – 34 YEARS OLD 35 – 44 YEARS OLD 45 – 54 YEARS OLD 55 – 64 YEARS OLD 65+ YEARS OLD FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. NOTE: META ONLY PERMITS PEOPLE AGED 13 AND ABOVE TO USE ITS PLATFORMS, SO WHILE THERE MAY BE USERS BELOW THE AGE OF 13, THEY DO NOT FEATURE IN THE AVAILABLE DATA. META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE”. COMPARABILITY: IMPORTANT BASE DATA REVISIONS AND SOURCE REPORTING CHANGES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE SHARE OF COMBINED, DEDUPLICATED POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH ACROSS FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM, AND MESSENGER, BY AGE AND GENDER DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF META’S AD AUDIENCE FEB 2022 DATAREPORTAL
  • 40. 40 0.76% 0.73% 0.13% 0.01% 0.02% +130% (+43 BPS) +78.0% (+32 BPS) +8.3% (+1 BP) [UNCHANGED] +100% (+1 BP) 66.03% 3.47% 11.88% 12.64% 4.33% +3.1% (+197 BPS) -28.9% (-141 BPS) +26.1% (+246 BPS) +166% (+789 BPS) -73.0% (-1,168 BPS) REDDIT TUMBLR LINKEDIN VKONTAKTE OTHER FACEBOOK TWITTER PINTEREST INSTAGRAM YOUTUBE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: SHARE DOES NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC FROM MESSENGER PLATFORMS. DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR A SELECTION OF PLATFORMS, AND PERCENTAGES REFLECT SHARE OF AVAILABLE PLATFORMS ONLY. FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF WEB PAGE REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM EACH SERVICE AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB PAGE REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM THE AVAILABLE SELECTION OF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS ON ANY DEVICE IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. CHILE SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC ARRIVING ON THIRD-PARTY WEBSITES VIA CLICKS OR TAPS ON LINKS PUBLISHED IN SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS (ANY DEVICE) WEB TRAFFIC REFERRALS FROM SOCIAL MEDIA FEB 2022
  • 42. ! In Q4 2021, Meta made some important changes to how its self-service tools report the potential advertising reach of its platforms, including a move to publishing audience figures as a range instead of as an absolute number. Our analysis suggests that Meta also revised its base data, resulting in some important corrections to published audience figures for Facebook and Messenger. As a result, we are currently unable to provide any figures for changes over time in these platforms’ audiences, and we advise readers not to compare the advertising audience figures for Facebook and Messenger contained within this report with figures published for those platforms in previous reports. For more information, please read our complete notes on data variance, potential mismatches, and curiosities: https://datareportal.com/notes-on-data. CHANGES IN META’S DATA REPORTING
  • 43. 43 12.50 65.0% 77.6% 52.0% 48.0% MILLION POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT META REPORTS CAN BE REACHED WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK FACEBOOK’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION FACEBOOK’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION AGED 13+ PERCENTAGE OF ITS AD AUDIENCE THAT FACEBOOK REPORTS IS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF ITS AD AUDIENCE THAT FACEBOOK REPORTS IS MALE SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE”. COMPARABILITY: META HAS SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK FACEBOOK: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
  • 44. 44 98.9% 1.1% 22.4% 76.5% USE ANY KIND OF MOBILE PHONE ONLY USE LAPTOP OR DESKTOP COMPUTER USE BOTH COMPUTERS AND MOBILE PHONES ONLY USE MOBILE PHONES (ANY TYPE) SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES, BASED ON DATA PUBLISHED IN JUNE 2021. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT VALUES FOR ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE. CHILE PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK’S ADVERTISING AUDIENCE THAT USES EACH DEVICE TO ACCESS THE PLATFORM, EITHER VIA AN APP OR A WEB BROWSER DEVICES USED TO ACCESS FACEBOOK FEB 2022
  • 45. 45 1 1 12 8 9 4 2 1 27 19 1 10 6 2 23 FACEBOOK PAGES β€œLIKED” (LIFETIME) POSTS β€œLIKED” IN THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS COMMENTS MADE IN THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS POSTS SHARED IN THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS ADS CLICKED OR TAPPED IN THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES, BASED ON DATA PUBLISHED IN JUNE 2021. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT MEDIAN VALUES FOR ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE. β€œADS” MAY INCLUDE ANY KIND OF PAID CONTENT PUBLISHED TO FACEBOOK, INCLUDING SPONSORED POSTS. CHILE THE NUMBER OF TIMES A β€œTYPICAL” USER AGED 18+ PERFORMS EACH ACTIVITY ON FACEBOOK FACEBOOK ACTIVITY FREQUENCY FEB 2022
  • 46. 46 13.16 88.5% 51.0% 49.0% MILLION 15.60 81.1% 88.1% +8.3% MILLION +1.2 MILLION POTENTIAL REACH OF ADS ON YOUTUBE YOUTUBE AD REACH vs. TOTAL POPULATION YOUTUBE AD REACH vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN YOUTUBE AD REACH YOUTUBE’S ADVERTISING REACH: USERS AGED 18+ YOUTUBE’S AD REACH AGE 18+ vs. TOTAL POPULATION AGE 18+ FEMALE YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+ vs. TOTAL YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+ MALE YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+ vs. TOTAL YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+ SOURCES: GOOGLE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE LOCATIONS ONLY. GOOGLE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER AND AGE DATA FOR USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE, AND ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE”. FIGURE FOR POTENTIAL REACH AGE 18+ USES A DIFFERENT AUDIENCE TOTAL TO THE ONE USED FOR REACH OF TOTAL POPULATION. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON YOUTUBE YOUTUBE: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
  • 47. 47 01 MUSICA 100 02 PELICULAS 83 03 CANCIONES 74 04 MARCIANEKE 72 05 PELICULAS COMPLETAS EN ESPAΓ‘OL 53 06 REGGAETON 42 07 TIK TOK 40 08 TIKTOK 37 09 MINECRAFT 34 10 PELICULAS COMPLETAS EN ESPAΓ‘OL LATINO 28 11 KAROL G 27 12 MÚSICA 26 13 BAD BUNNY 25 14 KARAOKE 23 15 SALSA 22 16 ANUEL 21 17 RAP 20 18 ELLA 20 19 FREE FIRE 18 20 DIANA 18 # SEARCH QUERY INDEX # SEARCH QUERY INDEX SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, BASED ON SEARCHES CONDUCTED ON YOUTUBE BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021. NOTE: ANY SPELLING ERRORS OR LANGUAGE INCONSISTENCIES IN SEARCH QUERIES ARE AS PUBLISHED BY GOOGLE TRENDS, AND ARE SHOWN β€œAS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CHANGES IN HOW PEOPLE ENTER WRITTEN LANGUAGE IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS. GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH ABSOLUTE SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE β€œINDEX” COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE SEARCH VOLUMES FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED WITH THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY. ADVISORY: GOOGLE TRENDS USES DYNAMIC SAMPLING, SO RANK ORDER AND INDEX VALUES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON WHEN THE TOOL IS ACCESSED, EVEN FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD. CHILE QUERIES WITH THE GREATEST VOLUME OF YOUTUBE SEARCH ACTIVITY BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021 TOP YOUTUBE SEARCHES FEB 2022
  • 48. 48 65.8% 72.3% 51.3% 48.7% 11.65 60.6% +9.9% +20.1% MILLION +1.1 MILLION +2.0 MILLION 90 INSTAGRAM AD REACH vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS INSTAGRAM AD REACH vs. POPULATION AGED 13+ FEMALE INSTAGRAM AD REACH vs. TOTAL INSTAGRAM AD REACH MALE INSTAGRAM AD REACH vs. TOTAL INSTAGRAM AD REACH TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH OF ADS ON INSTAGRAM INSTAGRAM AD REACH vs. TOTAL POPULATION QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE IN INSTAGRAM AD REACH YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN INSTAGRAM AD REACH SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY: META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE MAY NOT BE COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON INSTAGRAM INSTAGRAM: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
  • 49. 49 48.3% 57.5% 62.0% 38.0% 8.55 44.5% +11.6% [N/A] MILLION +887 THOUSAND [NEW DATA POINT] 90 TIKTOK AD REACH AGE 18+ vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS TIKTOK AD REACH AGE 18+ vs. POPULATION AGE 18+ FEMALE TIKTOK AD REACH vs. TOTAL TIKTOK AD REACH MALE TIKTOK AD REACH vs. TOTAL TIKTOK AD REACH POTENTIAL REACH OF ADS ON TIKTOK (AGE 18+ ONLY) TIKTOK AD REACH AGE 18+ vs. TOTAL POPULATION QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE IN TIKTOK AD REACH YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN TIKTOK AD REACH SOURCES: BYTEDANCE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE LOCATIONS ONLY. FIGURES USE THE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. BYTEDANCE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH AUDIENCE DATA FOR USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE, BUT ALLOW MARKETERS TO TARGET ADS TO USERS AGED 13 AND ABOVE. BYTEDANCE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE”. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE AGED 18+ THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON TIKTOK TIKTOK: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
  • 50. 50 8.40 43.7% 52.1% 53.3% 46.7% MILLION POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT META REPORTS CAN BE REACHED WITH ADS ON MESSENGER MESSENGER’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION MESSENGER’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION AGED 13+ PERCENTAGE OF ITS AD AUDIENCE THAT MESSENGER REPORTS IS FEMALE PERCENTAGE OF ITS AD AUDIENCE THAT MESSENGER REPORTS IS MALE SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. SOME MESSENGER AD FORMATS ARE CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE IN AUSTRALIA, CANADA, FRANCE, AND THE UNITED STATES, AND THIS MAY HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH FIGURES IN THOSE COUNTRIES. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE”. COMPARABILITY: META HAS SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK MESSENGER MESSENGER: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
  • 51. 51 35.0% 41.7% 45.8% 54.2% 6.20 32.2% +1.6% +10.7% MILLION +100 THOUSAND +600 THOUSAND 90 LINKEDIN AD REACH vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS LINKEDIN AD REACH vs. POPULATION AGED 18+ FEMALE LINKEDIN AD REACH vs. TOTAL LINKEDIN AD REACH MALE LINKEDIN AD REACH vs. TOTAL LINKEDIN AD REACH TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH OF ADS ON LINKEDIN LINKEDIN AD REACH vs. TOTAL POPULATION QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE IN LINKEDIN AD REACH YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN LINKEDIN AD REACH SOURCES: MICROSOFT’S LINKEDIN ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE OR REGISTERED MEMBER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTE: REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY: THE FIGURES PUBLISHED IN LINKEDIN’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES REFLECT TOTAL REGISTERED MEMBERS (NOT ACTIVE USERS), SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT DIRECTLY COMPARABLE WITH OTHER PLATFORMS. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON LINKEDIN LINKEDIN: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
  • 52. 52 6.2% 6.8% 78.7% 20.3% 1.10 5.7% 0% -21.4% MILLION [UNCHANGED] -300 THOUSAND 90 SNAPCHAT AD REACH vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS SNAPCHAT AD REACH vs. POPULATION AGED 13+ FEMALE SNAPCHAT AD REACH vs. TOTAL SNAPCHAT AD REACH MALE SNAPCHAT AD REACH vs. TOTAL SNAPCHAT AD REACH TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH OF ADS ON SNAPCHAT SNAPCHAT AD REACH vs. TOTAL POPULATION QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE IN SNAPCHAT AD REACH YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN SNAPCHAT AD REACH SOURCES: SNAP’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA ONLY, USING MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. GENDER DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR β€œFEMALE” AND β€œMALE” USERS, BUT GENDER AUDIENCE VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO THE TOTAL AUDIENCE FIGURE, SO GENDER PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100%. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON SNAPCHAT SNAPCHAT: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
  • 53. 53 2.90 15.1% 18.0% 16.4% +1.8% MILLION +50 THOUSAND 90 POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT TWITTER REPORTS CAN BE REACHED WITH ADS ON TWITTER TWITTER’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION TWITTER’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION AGED 13+ TWITTER’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL INTERNET USERS QUARTER-ON- QUARTER CHANGE IN TWITTER’S POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH SOURCES: TWITTER’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. FIGURES PUBLISHED IN TWITTER’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ARE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT FLUCTUATION, EVEN WITHIN SHORT PERIODS OF TIME. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. DUE TO ANOMALIES IN SOURCE DATA, WE ARE CURRENTLY UNABLE TO OFFER DATA FOR TWITTER USE BY GENDER. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. CHILE THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON TWITTER TWITTER: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW FEB 2022
  • 55. 55 26.32 136.9% +2.3% 96.3% MILLION +581 THOUSAND NUMBER OF CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS (EXCLUDING IOT) NUMBER OF CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS COMPARED WITH TOTAL POPULATION YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS SHARE OF CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS THAT ARE BROADBAND (3G, 4G, 5G) SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE. NOTES: TOTAL CELLULAR CONNECTIONS INCLUDE DEVICES OTHER THAN MOBILE PHONES, BUT EXCLUDE CELLULAR IOT CONNECTIONS. FIGURES MAY SIGNIFICANTLY EXCEED FIGURES FOR POPULATION DUE TO MULTIPLE CONNECTIONS AND CONNECTED DEVICES PER PERSON. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. VERSIONS OF THIS CHART PUBLISHED IN SOME OF OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS FEATURED CELLULAR CONNECTION FIGURES THAT INCLUDED CELLULAR IOT CONNECTIONS. FIGURES SHOWN HERE DO NOT INCLUDE CELLULAR IOT CONNECTIONS. CHILE USE OF MOBILE PHONES AND DEVICES THAT CONNECT TO CELLULAR NETWORKS MOBILE CONNECTIVITY FEB 2022
  • 56. 56 25.8 M 26.3 M 26.7 M 26.5 M 25.7 M 26.3 M +2.1% +1.4% -0.7% -2.9% +2.3% Q4 2016 Q4 2017 Q4 2018 Q4 2019 Q4 2020 Q4 2021 SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, β€œK” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G. β€œ123 K” = 123,000), β€œM” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND β€œB” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. β€œ1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. COMPARABILITY: BASE REVISIONS. NUMBERS MAY NOT CORRELATE WITH VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE NUMBER OF CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS OVER TIME FEB 2022
  • 57. 57 $82.86 7.2% $0.39 0.03% PRICE OF THE CHEAPEST SMARTPHONE HANDSET (IN USD) PRICE OF THE CHEAPEST SMARTPHONE HANDSET vs. AVERAGE INCOME AVERAGE PRICE OF 1GB OF CELLULAR MOBILE DATA (IN USD) AVERAGE PRICE OF 1GB OF CELLULAR MOBILE DATA vs. AVERAGE INCOME SOURCES: HANDSET PRICES: ALLIANCE FOR AFFORDABLE INTERNET; ACCESS THE FULL DATASET AT A4AI.ORG. MOBILE DATA PRICES: CABLE.CO.UK; WORLD BANK. COMPARABILITY: VALUE FOR HANDSET PRICES vs. MONTHLY INCOME AS PUBLISHED BY A4AI, AND MAY USE A DIFFERENT VALUE FOR AVERAGE MONTHLY INCOME COMPARED WITH THE DATA USED TO CALCULATE THE PRICE OF 1GB OF MOBILE DATA vs. MONTHLY INCOME. AS A RESULT, VALUES MAY NOT CORRELATE ACROSS DATA POINTS. CHILE THE COST OF BUYING A SMARTPHONE HANDSET AND 1GB OF CELLULAR MOBILE DATA, AND COMPARISONS WITH AVERAGE MONTHLY INCOME AFFORDABILITY OF MOBILE INTERNET ACCESS FEB 2022
  • 58. 58 83.71% 16.07% 0.20% 0% 0.02% -1.6% (-138 BPS) +9.2% (+136 BPS) +17.6% (+3 BPS) [UNCHANGED] -33.3% (-1 BP) SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC ORIGINATING FROM ANDROID DEVICES SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC ORIGINATING FROM APPLE IOS DEVICES SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC ORIGINATING FROM SAMSUNG OS DEVICES SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC ORIGINATING FROM KAI OS DEVICES SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC ORIGINATING FROM OTHER OS DEVICES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO BROWSERS ON MOBILE PHONES RUNNING EACH OPERATING SYSTEM COMPARED WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO MOBILE BROWSERS IN NOVEMBER 2021. FIGURES FOR SAMSUNG OS REFER ONLY TO THOSE DEVICES RUNNING OPERATING SYSTEMS DEVELOPED BY SAMSUNG (E.G. BADA AND TIZEN), AND DO NOT INCLUDE SAMSUNG DEVICES RUNNING ANDROID. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. CHILE PERCENTAGE OF WEB PAGE REQUESTS ORIGINATING FROM MOBILE HANDSETS RUNNING EACH MOBILE OPERATING SYSTEM SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC BY MOBILE OS FEB 2022
  • 59. 59 913.0 +6% $355.0 +59% MILLION MILLION TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE APP DOWNLOADS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE TOTAL NUMBER OF MOBILE APP DOWNLOADS ANNUAL CONSUMER SPEND ON MOBILE APPS AND IN-APP PURCHASES (USD) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN CONSUMER SPEND ON MOBILE APPS AND IN-APP PURCHASES SOURCES: APP ANNIE β€œSTATE OF MOBILE 2022” REPORT. SEE STATEOFMOBILE2022.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT COMBINED CONSUMER ACTIVITY ACROSS THE GOOGLE PLAY STORE, APPLE IOS APP STORE, AND THIRD-PARTY ANDROID APP STORES BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021. β€œCONSUMER SPEND” ONLY INCLUDES SPEND ON APPS AND IN-APP PURCHASES VIA APP STORES, AND DOES NOT INCLUDE REVENUES FROM ECOMMERCE TRANSACTIONS OR MOBILE ADVERTISING. CONSUMER SPEND FIGURES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. CHILE HEADLINES FOR MOBILE APP DOWNLOADS AND CONSUMER SPEND (IN U.S. DOLLARS) BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021 MOBILE APP MARKET OVERVIEW FEB 2022
  • 60. 60 01 WHATSAPP META 02 FACEBOOK META 03 INSTAGRAM META 04 FACEBOOK MESSENGER META 05 SPOTIFY SPOTIFY 06 BANCOESTADO BANCOESTADO 07 MERCADOLIBRE MERCADOLIBRE 08 NETFLIX NETFLIX 09 ALIEXPRESS ALIBABA GROUP 10 TWITTER TWITTER 01 POKΓ‰MON GO NIANTIC 02 FREE FIRE SEA 03 CLASH ROYALE SUPERCELL 04 CALL OF DUTY: MOBILE ACTIVISION BLIZZARD 05 AMONG US! INNERSLOTH 06 POKΓ‰MON UNITE POKEMON 07 ROBLOX ROBLOX 08 AETHERSX2 TAHLRETH 09 BRAWL STARS SUPERCELL 10 MINECRAFT POCKET EDITION MICROSOFT # MOBILE APP COMPANY # MOBILE GAME COMPANY SOURCE: APP ANNIE β€œSTATE OF MOBILE 2022” REPORT. SEE STATEOFMOBILE2022.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: RANKINGS BASED ON COMBINED MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS ACROSS IPHONES AND ANDROID PHONES BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021, EXCLUDING PRE-INSTALLED APPS (E.G. YOUTUBE ON ANDROID PHONES, IMESSAGE ON IPHONES). CHILE APP ANNIE’S RANKING OF MOBILE APPS AND MOBILE GAMES BY AVERAGE NUMBER OF MONTHLY ACTIVE BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021 APP ANNIE APP RANKING: ACTIVE USERS FEB 2022
  • 61. 61 01 TIKTOK BYTEDANCE 02 WHATSAPP META 03 DISNEY+ DISNEY 04 ZOOM CLOUD MEETINGS ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS 05 INSTAGRAM META 06 QR & BARCODE READER TEACAPPS 07 SHEIN SHEIN 08 MERCADOLIBRE MERCADOLIBRE 09 BANCOESTADO BANCOESTADO 10 SHOPEE SEA 01 FREE FIRE SEA 02 ROBLOX ROBLOX 03 AMONG US! INNERSLOTH 04 PK XD NASPERS 05 BRIDGE RACE IRONSOURCE 06 DOP 2: DELETE ONE PART SAYGAMES 07 TOCA LIFE: WORLD SPIN MASTER 08 HAIR CHALLENGE ZYNGA 09 PHONE CASE DIY CRAZY LABS 10 SCULPT PEOPLE CRAZY LABS # MOBILE APP COMPANY # MOBILE GAME COMPANY SOURCE: APP ANNIE β€œSTATE OF MOBILE 2022” REPORT. SEE STATEOFMOBILE2022.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: RANKINGS BASED ON COMBINED CONSUMER ACTIVITY ACROSS THE GOOGLE PLAY STORE AND APPLE IOS APP STORE BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021. CHILE APP ANNIE’S RANKING OF MOBILE APPS AND MOBILE GAMES BY TOTAL NUMBER OF DOWNLOADS BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021 APP ANNIE APP RANKING: DOWNLOADS FEB 2022
  • 62. 62 01 DISNEY+ DISNEY 02 TINDER MATCH GROUP 03 TWITCH AMAZON 04 CRUNCHYROLL SONY 05 GOOGLE ONE GOOGLE 06 BADOO BUMBLE 07 TIKTOK BYTEDANCE 08 FACEBOOK META 09 AMAZON PRIME VIDEO AMAZON 10 HBO MAX AT&T 01 FREE FIRE SEA 02 ROBLOX ROBLOX 03 COIN MASTER MOON ACTIVE 04 CANDY CRUSH SAGA ACTIVISION BLIZZARD 05 CALL OF DUTY: MOBILE ACTIVISION BLIZZARD 06 CLASH ROYALE SUPERCELL 07 GENSHIN IMPACT MIHOYO 08 HOMESCAPES PLAYRIX 09 GARDENSCAPES - NEW ACRES PLAYRIX 10 BRAWL STARS SUPERCELL # MOBILE APP COMPANY # MOBILE GAME COMPANY SOURCE: APP ANNIE β€œSTATE OF MOBILE 2022” REPORT. SEE STATEOFMOBILE2022.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: RANKINGS BASED ON COMBINED CONSUMER ACTIVITY ACROSS THE GOOGLE PLAY STORE AND APPLE IOS APP STORE BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021. β€œCONSUMER SPEND” ONLY INCLUDES SPEND ON APPS AND IN-APP PURCHASES VIA APP STORES, AND DOES NOT INCLUDE REVENUES FROM ECOMMERCE OR MOBILE ADVERTISING. CHILE APP ANNIE’S RANKING OF MOBILE APPS AND MOBILE GAMES BY TOTAL CONSUMER SPEND BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021 APP ANNIE APP RANKING: CONSUMER SPEND FEB 2022
  • 64. 64 70.6% 77.4% 30.8% 28.8% 58.0% 61.8% 16.1% 21.5% 61.4% 69.8% 19.4% 26.8% 24.9% 31.5% 20.6% 27.0% 65.4% 22.9% 28.0% 23.6% 73.8% 29.8% 59.8% 18.7% FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE MADE OR RECEIVED DIGITAL PAYMENTS IN THE PAST YEAR MADE A PURCHASE ON THE INTERNET IN THE PAST YEAR USED ONLINE BANKING IN THE PAST YEAR USED THE INTERNET TO PAY BILLS IN THE PAST YEAR FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE ACCOUNT WITH A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION CREDIT CARD OWNERSHIP DEBIT CARD OWNERSHIP MOBILE MONEY ACCOUNT (E.G. MPESA, GCASH) SOURCE: WORLD BANK. NOTES: SOME FIGURES HAVE NOT BEEN UPDATED IN THE PAST YEAR, SO MAY BE LESS REPRESENTATIVE OF CURRENT BEHAVIOURS. PERCENTAGES ARE OF ADULTS AGED 15 AND ABOVE, NOT OF TOTAL POPULATION. MOBILE MONEY ACCOUNTS ONLY REFER TO SERVICES THAT STORE FUNDS IN AN ELECTRONIC WALLET LINKED DIRECTLY TO A PHONE NUMBER, SUCH AS MPESA, GCASH, AND TIGO PESA. FIGURES FOR MOBILE MONEY ACCOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE PEOPLE WHO USE β€˜OVER-THE-TOP’ MOBILE PAYMENT SERVICES SUCH AS APPLE PAY, GOOGLE PAY, OR SAMSUNG PAY. CHILE PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT OWNS OR USES EACH PRODUCT OR SERVICE FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORS FEB 2022
  • 65. 65 12.05 $7.64 $634 36.2% MILLION BILLION +7.5% (+837 THOUSAND) +39.6% (+$2.2 BILLION) +29.9% (+$146) +4.8% (+165 BPS) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE PURCHASING CONSUMER GOODS VIA THE INTERNET TOTAL ANNUAL SPEND ON ONLINE CONSUMER GOODS PURCHASES (USD) AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE PER CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE USER (USD) SHARE OF CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE SPEND ATTRIBUTABLE TO PURCHASES MADE VIA MOBILE PHONES SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: β€œCONSUMER GOODS” INCLUDE: ELECTRONICS, FASHION, FURNITURE, TOYS, HOBBY, DIY, BEAUTY, CONSUMER HEALTHCARE, PERSONAL CARE, HOUSEHOLD CARE, FOOD, BEVERAGES, AND PHYSICAL MEDIA. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE HEADLINES FOR THE ADOPTION AND USE OF CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE (B2C ONLY) OVERVIEW OF CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE FEB 2022
  • 66. 66 $336.0 $236.5 $110.9 $226.1 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION +33.1% (+$84 MILLION) +70.0% (+$97 MILLION) +31.3% (+$26 MILLION) +20.1% (+$38 MILLION) $3.29 $1.29 $1.11 $1.04 BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION +54.0% (+$1.2 BILLION) +28.6% (+$286 MILLION) +21.7% (+$199 MILLION) +37.5% (+$284 MILLION) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE PERSONAL & HOUSEHOLD CARE FOOD BEVERAGES PHYSICAL MEDIA YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE ELECTRONICS FASHION FURNITURE TOYS, HOBBY, DIY SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR REVENUES FOR 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. THE β€œPERSONAL & HOUSEHOLD CARE” CATEGORY INCLUDES BEAUTY AND CONSUMER HEALTHCARE. THE β€œPHYSICAL MEDIA” CATEGORY DOES NOT INCLUDE DIGITAL DOWNLOADS OR STREAMING. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE ANNUAL SPEND IN EACH CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE CATEGORY (U.S. DOLLARS, B2C ONLY) ECOMMERCE: CONSUMER GOODS CATEGORIES FEB 2022
  • 67. 67 01 FALABELLA 100 02 NIKE 74 03 RIPLEY 65 04 SAMSUNG 62 05 ZAPATILLAS MUJER 53 06 MERCADO LIBRE 48 07 LIDER 48 08 SODIMAC 47 09 IPHONE 46 10 PARIS 40 11 ADIDAS 38 12 EASY 34 13 ZAPATILLAS HOMBRE 33 14 COMEDOR 26 15 HUAWEI 24 16 ESCRITORIO 23 17 NOTEBOOK 22 18 ZAPATILLAS NIKE 21 19 HITES 21 20 LA POLAR 21 # SEARCH QUERY INDEX # SEARCH QUERY INDEX SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, BASED ON GOOGLE SHOPPING SEARCHES CONDUCTED BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021. NOTES: ANY SPELLING ERRORS OR LANGUAGE INCONSISTENCIES IN SEARCH QUERIES ARE AS PUBLISHED BY GOOGLE TRENDS, AND ARE SHOWN β€œAS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CHANGES IN HOW PEOPLE USE LANGUAGE IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS. GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH ABSOLUTE SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE β€œINDEX vs. TOP QUERY” COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE SEARCH VOLUMES FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED WITH THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY. ADVISORY: GOOGLE TRENDS USES DYNAMIC SAMPLING, SO RANK ORDER AND INDEX VALUES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON WHEN THE TOOL IS ACCESSED, EVEN FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD. CHILE QUERIES WITH THE GREATEST VOLUME OF GOOGLE SHOPPING SEARCH ACTIVITY BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021 TOP GOOGLE SHOPPING QUERIES FEB 2022
  • 68. 68 $295.9 $349.1 $185.2 $1.57 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION +43% (+$89 MILLION) +71% (+$145 MILLION) +33% (+$46 MILLION) +89% (+$737 THOUSAND) $774.5 $174.0 $4.98 $77.75 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION +49% (+$254 MILLION) +109% (+$91 MILLION) +39% (+$1.4 MILLION) +6.4% (+$4.7 MILLION) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE HOTELS PACKAGE HOLIDAYS VACATION RENTALS CRUISES YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE FLIGHTS CAR RENTALS TRAINS LONG-DISTANCE BUSES SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK; STATISTA MOBILITY MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR REVENUES FOR 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. VALUES DO NOT INCLUDE REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH PUBLIC TRANSPORT, NON-COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS, FERRIES, TAXIS, RIDE-SHARING, RIDE-HAILING, OR CHAUFFEUR SERVICES. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE ANNUAL SPEND ON ONLINE TRAVEL AND TOURISM SERVICES (U.S. DOLLARS) ONLINE TRAVEL AND TOURISM FEB 2022
  • 69. 69 $649.5 $258.0 $232.9 $70.22 $88.34 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION +26.7% (+$137 MILLION) +25.6% (+$53 MILLION) +26.8% (+$49 MILLION) +25.5% (+$14 MILLION) +30.5% (+$21 MILLION) TOTAL VIDEO GAMES VIDEO-ON-DEMAND EPUBLISHING DIGITAL MUSIC YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR SPEND IN 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. INCLUDES CONTENT DOWNLOADS AND SUBSCRIPTIONS TO STREAMING SERVICES AND ONLINE PUBLISHERS. DOES NOT INCLUDE PHYSICAL MEDIA OR USER-GENERATED CONTENT. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE ANNUAL SPEND ON DIGITAL MEDIA DOWNLOADS AND SUBSCRIPTIONS DIGITAL MEDIA SPEND FEB 2022
  • 70. 70 4.53 +21.9% $218.4 +32.0% $48.20 MILLION +814 THOUSAND MILLION +$53 MILLION YOY: +8.3% NUMBER OF PEOPLE ORDERING FOOD DELIVERY VIA ONLINE PLATFORMS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY USERS TOTAL ANNUAL VALUE OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY ORDERS (USD) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE VALUE OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY ORDERS AVERAGE ANNUAL VALUE OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY ORDERS PER USER (USD) SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. ONLY INCLUDES ORDERS MADE VIA ONLINE SERVICES. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE HEADLINES FOR THE ADOPTION AND USE OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY SERVICES ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY OVERVIEW FEB 2022
  • 71. 71 12.13 +7.5% $12.01 +47.7% $991 MILLION +850 THOUSAND BILLION +$3.9 BILLION YOY: +37% NUMBER OF PEOPLE MAKING DIGITAL PAYMENTS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE MAKING DIGITAL PAYMENTS TOTAL ANNUAL VALUE OF DIGITAL PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS (USD) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN THE VALUE OF DIGITAL PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS AVERAGE ANNUAL VALUE OF DIGITAL PAYMENTS PER USER (USD) SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: β€œDIGITAL PAYMENTS” INCLUDE MOBILE P.O.S. PAYMENTS (E.G. PAYMENTS VIA APPLE PAY OR SAMSUNG PAY), B2C DIGITAL COMMERCE, AND B2C DIGITAL REMITTANCES. VALUES DO NOT INCLUDE B2B TRANSACTIONS. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR FOR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE HEADLINES FOR THE ADOPTION AND USE OF DIGITALLY ENABLED PAYMENT SERVICES BY END CONSUMERS OVERVIEW OF CONSUMER DIGITAL PAYMENTS FEB 2022
  • 73. 73 $521.4 $140.2 $235.8 $128.5 $16.95 MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION +37.0% (+$141 MILLION) +47.0% (+$45 MILLION) +29.8% (+$54 MILLION) +45.0% (+$40 MILLION) +13.7% (+$2.0 MILLION) TOTAL SEARCH ADS BANNER ADS VIDEO ADS CLASSIFIEDS YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR SPEND IN 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. DOES NOT INCLUDE ADVERTISING REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMAIL MARKETING, AUDIO ADS, INFLUENCER MARKETING, SPONSORSHIPS, PRODUCT PLACEMENT, OR COMMISSION-BASED AFFILIATE SYSTEMS. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE ANNUAL SPEND ON DIGITAL ADVERTISING, WITH DETAIL BY ADVERTISING FORMAT (U.S. DOLLARS) VALUE OF THE DIGITAL ADVERTISING MARKET FEB 2022
  • 74. 74 46.5% -2.2% $242.6 +34.0% -105 BPS MILLION +$62 MILLION SOCIAL MEDIA’S SHARE OF TOTAL DIGITAL ADVERTISING SPEND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN SOCIAL MEDIA’S SHARE OF TOTAL DIGITAL ADVERTISING SPEND ANNUAL SPEND ON SOCIAL MEDIA ADVERTISING (USD) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN SOCIAL MEDIA ADVERTISING SPEND SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. DOES NOT INCLUDE ADVERTISING REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMAIL MARKETING, AUDIO ADS, INFLUENCER MARKETING, SPONSORSHIPS, PRODUCT PLACEMENT, OR COMMISSION-BASED AFFILIATE SYSTEMS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE SOCIAL MEDIA’S SHARE OF THE DIGITAL ADVERTISING MARKET SOCIAL MEDIA ADVERTISING OVERVIEW FEB 2022
  • 75. 75 79.9% +1.0% $416.5 +38.5% +82 BPS MILLION +$116 MILLION PROGRAMMATIC’S SHARE OF TOTAL DIGITAL ADVERTISING SPEND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN PROGRAMMATIC’S SHARE OF TOTAL DIGITAL ADVERTISING SPEND ANNUAL SPEND ON PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING (USD) YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING SPEND (USD) SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. DOES NOT INCLUDE ADVERTISING REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMAIL MARKETING, AUDIO ADS, INFLUENCER MARKETING, SPONSORSHIPS, PRODUCT PLACEMENT, OR COMMISSION-BASED AFFILIATE SYSTEMS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). β€œBPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS. CHILE SHARE OF DIGITAL ADVERTISING FULFILLED VIA PROGRAMMATIC TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING OVERVIEW FEB 2022
  • 77. DATAREPORTAL.COM/LIBRARY FIND THOUSANDS OF REPORTS EXPLORING DIGITAL TRENDS IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD IN OUR FREE ONLINE LIBRARY:
  • 78. _DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL 2022_ DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022 _DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL 2022_ DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022 We are a global socially-led creative agency, with unrivaled social media expertise. With 1,000+ people in 15 offices spanning four continents, we deliver a global perspective to our clients in a time when social media is shaping culture. We make ideas powered by people. We understand social behaviours within online communities, cultures and subcultures, spanning the social and gaming landscape. We work with the world’s biggest brands, including adidas, Samsung, Netflix and Google, to reach the right people in a strategic, relevant and effective way. wearesocial.com A B O U T W E A R E S O C I A L
  • 79. Learn more at kepios.com LEARN MORE Β» LEARN MORE Β» LEARN MORE Β» LEARN MORE Β» LEARN MORE Β» Go beyond headlines and hypotheses to understand what people are really doing online, and turn insights into actionable plans and results. We research and produce white-label content and co- branded reports that offer rich insights into what people everywhere are doing online. Add our team’s experience and insight to your decision- making. Available through regular, retained advisory, or ad hoc for one-off sessions. Custom keynote presentations that bring the latest digital trends to life at conferences, events, and private meetings, whether online or in person. Interactive briefings that make it easy to keep track of digital trends, and identify how evolving behaviours will impact future success. CONSUMER RESEARCH REPORTS & CONTENT ADVISORY SERVICES KEYNOTE PRESENTATIONS DIGITAL BRIEFINGS In addition to producing the Global Digital Reports, we also offer: Kepios helps the world understand what’s really happening online. MAKE SENSE OF DIGITAL TRENDS
  • 80. Diversity of industries and topics Statista bundles statistical data on over 80,000 topics from over 170 industries. The data comes from over 22,500 sources. Quick help for all cases With Statista, users can obtain comprehensive overviews and conduct targeted research – with minimal time expenditure. Global data from numerous countries Statista offers insights and facts on industries from 150+ countries. Markets, companies and consumers from all over the world are highlighted. Reliable and efficient research basis Statista has been the market leader in providing business data for 13 years. Companies, universities, schools and the media trust our service. CLICK HERE TO DISCOVER OUR ACCOUNTS AND FIND DATA FOR YOUR BUSINESS COSMOS Statista – a universe of data
  • 81. Extensive Datasets We provide data on every mobile operator in every country worldwide, with over 30 million data points, updated daily. Annually, GSMA Intelligence publishes over 100 reports and exclusive analyses, adding greater insight into our data and supporting our customers in making stronger business choices. Our forecasting experts provide a five-year (and beyond) view into the future, enabling long-term investment planning. Updated quarterly, our forecasts are consistently accurate within +/- 2.5 % of reported data. Topical and Timely Research Pinpoint Accuracy We serve a wide array of industries in the mobile ecosystem and beyond, including most of the world’s mobile operators plus major vendors, regulators, international institutions and vertical sectors ranging from automotive to retail. Industry Trusted 3 Global Offices Delhi Barcelona London Serves over 800 organisations 40,000 users worldwide Definitive data and analysis for the mobile industry
  • 82. Semrush .Trends Data. Insights. Impact. Semrush .Trends provides instant market overview and competitive digital insights for those who are looking to grow their business. It enables an in-depth view of market conditions and trends for creating a growth-driven marketing strategy. All-encompassing insights for any website, industry or market across 190 countries & regions A single solution with 50+ tools for your strategic vision Accurate data for real-time market and competitive insights
  • 84. Similarweb provides insights for any website, app, industry and market Websites 100M+ Apps 4.7M+ Countries 190+ Industries 210+ Search Terms 1B+ E-commerce product SKUs 250M+
  • 86. Prior to our Digital 2021 reports, we included data sourced from social media platforms’ self-service advertising tools in our calculations of internet user numbers, but we no longer include this data in our internet user figures. This is because the user numbers reported by social media platforms are typically based on active user accounts, and may not represent unique individuals. For example, one person may maintain more than one active presence (account) on the same social media platform. Similarly, some accounts may represent β€˜non-human’ entities, including: pets and animals; historical figures; businesses, causes, groups, and organisations; places of interest; etc. As a result, the figures we report for social media users may exceed internet user numbers. However, while this may seem counter-intuitive or surprising, such instances do not represent errors in the data or in our reporting. Rather, these differences may indicate delays in the reporting of internet user numbers, or they may indicate higher instances of individuals managing multiple social media accounts, or β€˜non-human’ social media accounts. If you have any questions about specific data points in these reports, or if you’d like to offer your organisation’s data for consideration in future reports, please email our reports team: reports@kepios.com. footnotes of each relevant chart, but please use caution when comparing data from different reports, because changes to research samples, base data, research methodologies, and approaches to reporting may mean that values are not comparable. Furthermore, due to the differing data collection and treatment methodologies, and the different periods during which data have been collected, there may be significant differences in the reported metrics for similar data points throughout this report. For example, data from surveys often varies over time, even if that data has been collected by the same organisation using the same approach in each wave of their research. In particular, reports of internet user numbers vary considerably between different sources and over time. In part, this is because there are significant challenges associated with collecting, analysing, and publishing internet user data on a regular basis, not least because research into public internet use necessitates the use of face-to-face surveys. Different organisations may also adopt different approaches to sampling the population for research into internet use, and variations in areas such as the age range of the survey population, or the balance between urban and rural respondents, may play an important role in determining eventual findings. Note that COVID-19 has limited internet user research. Note: This page is a summary of our comprehensive notes on data variance, potential mismatches, and curiosities, which you can read in full at https://datareportal.com/notes-on-data. This report features data from a wide variety of different sources, including market research agencies, internet and social media companies, governments, public bodies, news media, and private individuals, as well as extrapolations and analysis of that data. Wherever possible, we’ve prioritised data sources that provide broader geographical coverage, in order to minimise potential variations between data points, and to offer more reliable comparison across countries. However, where we believe that standalone metrics provide a more reliable reference, we use such standalone numbers to ensure more accurate reporting. Please note that some data points may only be available for a limited selection of countries, so we may not be able to report the same data in all reports. From time to time, we may also change the source(s) that we use to inform specific data points. As a result, some figures may appear to change in unexpected ways from one report to another. Wherever we’re aware of these changes, we include details in the NOTES ON DATA VARIANCE, MISMATCHES, AND CURIOSITIES
  • 87. anyone else for any direct, indirect, punitive, incidental, special, consequential, exemplary or similar loss or damage, or loss or damage of any kind, suffered by you or anyone else as a result of any use, action or decision taken by you or anyone else in any way connected to this report or the information contained herein, or the result(s) thereof, even if advised of the possibility of such loss or damage. This report may contain reference to third- party data providers, however this report does not endorse any such third parties or their products or services, nor is this report sponsored by, endorsed by or associated with such third parties. Except for those portions of this report relating to the perspectives of We Are Social, this report and any opinions contained herein have been prepared by Kepios, and have not been specifically approved or disapproved by We Are Social. This report is subject to change without notice. To ensure you have the most recent version of this report, please visit our website at https://datareportal.com/. This report contains data, tables, figures, maps, flags, analyses and technical notes that relate to various geographical territories around the world, however reference to these territories and any associated elements (including names and flags) does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Kepios, We Are Social, or any of the featured brands, nor any of those organisations’ partners, affiliates, employees or agents, concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This report is provided with the understanding that it does not constitute professional advice or services of any kind and should therefore not be substituted for independent investigations, thought or judgment. Accordingly, neither Kepios, nor We Are Social, nor any of the brands and organisations featured or cited herein, nor any of their partners, affiliates, group companies, employees or agents shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be liable to you or This report has been compiled by Kepios Pte. Ltd. (β€œKepios”) on behalf of We Are Social Ltd. (β€œWe Are Social”) for informational purposes only, and relies on data from a wide variety of sources, including but not limited to public and private companies, market research firms, government agencies, NGOs, and private individuals. While Kepios and We Are Social strive to ensure that all data and charts contained in this report are, as at the time of publishing, accurate and up-to-date, neither Kepios, nor We Are Social, nor any of the other featured brands and organisations shall be responsible for any errors or omissions contained in this report, or for the results obtained from its use. All information contained in this report is provided β€œas is”, with no guarantee whatsoever of its accuracy, completeness, correctness or non-infringement of third- party rights and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including without limitation, warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. DISCLAIMER AND IMPORTANT NOTES