discipline-training-classroom-procedures.pptx

Discipline Training:
Classroom Procedures
Behavioral Expectations, Behavioral Violations, Other Forms of
Discipline, and Classroom Exclusion

Webinar Q&A Protocols
• Please submit questions in writing through the question log
• Please keep questions related to the webinar content
• OSPI staff and guests will not be able to answer questions about
specific scenarios, students, or experiences
• OSPI staff is readily available to provide technical assistance
following the webinar
• There will be a 5 minute break between the presentation and Q&A
portions of the webinar
• OSPI staff will review and group questions for Q&A portion

OSPI Equity Statement
Each student, family, and community possesses strengths and cultural knowledge that
benefit their peers, educators, and schools.
Ensuring educational equity:
• Goes beyond equality; it requires education leaders to examine the ways current
policies and practices result in disparate outcomes for our students of color,
students living in poverty, students receiving special education and English Learner
services, students who identify as LGBTQ+, and highly mobile student populations.
• Requires education leaders to develop an understanding of historical contexts;
engage students, families, and community representatives as partners in decision-
making; and actively dismantle systemic barriers, replacing them with policies and
practices that ensure all students have access to the instruction and support they
need to succeed in our schools.
https://www.k12.wa.us/about-ospi/about-agency

Legal Disclaimer
These materials constitute OSPI’s interpretation of discipline policies and
procedures under chapter 28A.600 RCW and chapter 392-400 WAC and are
provided to support school districts’ understanding of their obligations under
these laws. The information in these materials is subject to change based on
future legal and policy changes. Before taking action based on the information in
these materials, please review state and federal laws and regulations or consult
with legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances. These materials
are intended for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Training Considerations
OSPI discipline training contains some content related to Multi-Tiered System of
Supports (MTSS), Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS), restorative
justice practices, culturally responsive teaching, family engagement, trauma-informed
approaches, function-based thinking, classroom management strategies, etc.
However, effective implementation of MTSS/PBIS frameworks or any particular best
practices and strategies, interventions, or approaches should include ongoing and job-
embedded professional learning.
OSPI discipline training can be used to support such efforts, but the content is not
comprehensive. Therefore, participants should identify areas where school and district
staff could benefit from additional training and supplemental resources.

Learning Objectives
• Identify strategies for adopting positive behavioral expectations and
clearly defined behavioral violations
• Integrate best practices and strategies into district, school, and classroom
discipline policies and procedures
• Describe differential selection and equitable approaches to reducing
disproportionality in discipline
• List the conditions for using classroom exclusion and related procedures

Classroom Decision-Making
Differential Selection
“School discipline processes generally begin with an office referral, most
often made by a classroom teacher.” (Anyon, et al., 2014, p. 380)
• Disparities in discipline begin at the classroom level
• Primarily minor and subjective categories (e.g. defiance and disrespect),
instead of major and objective categories (e.g. firearms possession)
• Racial/ethnic disparities persist even when accounting for student
characteristics that include family income and likelihood of misbehavior
(Anyon, et al., 2014; Gregory, Skiba, & Noguera, 2010)

The Discipline Continuum
Selection (Teacher)

Administrative Decision-Making
Differential Processing
“There is tremendous local flexibility in the types of infractions that move forward from the
classroom to the office and in the types of consequences issued by administrators.”
(Gregory, Skiba, & Noguera, 2010, p. 63)
• Following a classroom exclusion, school administrators are primarily responsible for
deciding and assigning consequences
• Subjective discipline situations “have the greatest potential for bias in processing, as
administrators' behavioral expectations – like those of teachers' and students' – are
shaped by perception, culture, and context” (Anyon, et al., 2014, p. 380)
(Anyon, et al., 2014; Gregory, Skiba, & Noguera, 2010)

The Discipline Continuum
Selection (Teacher) Processing (Principal)

Proactive Supports in Regular Educational
Settings
• Continuum of supports for students and staff
• Screening for additional supports (academic, social-emotional, and behavioral)
• Intervention programs (push-in, pull-out, or extended learning opportunities)
• Progress monitoring to determine whether the intervention should be changed
or modified
• Diagnostic data to align interventions with students’ strengths and needs
• Clear entrance and exit criteria for intervention programs
• Implementation fidelity and program evaluation

Purpose of Discipline Rules
One of the purposes of OSPI discipline regulations is to ensure that
school districts in Washington:
“Administer discipline in ways that respond to the needs and
strengths of students, support students in meeting behavioral
expectations, and keep students in the classroom to the maximum
extent possible;” See WAC 392-400-010(5)

Defining Regular Educational Setting
The particular classroom, instructional or activity area in which a
student is provided the instructional program of basic education
as required under WA law.
• Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
• Differentiated instruction
• Supplemental instruction and services
• Academic standards and rigor
• Behavioral expectations

Behavioral Expectations: Reflection
CC0 Public Domain via Pixabay.com
Make a list of behavioral expectations
and examples that are common in
your school setting.

Behavioral Expectations: Positive with
Examples
Positive behaviors that are well-
defined for students and staff:
Schools should develop common
language around positively stated
behavioral expectations. School
staff should teach, model, and
reinforce desired behaviors.
Negative practices that are
identified for change can be
reframed positively.
Examples that are identified for
specific school settings: Schools
should identify common locations
where behavioral expectations can
be demonstrated and observed.
Schools should then provide
examples of what positive
behaviors look like in various
school settings.

Behavioral Expectations: Feedback
Transitioning from reprimanding
negative behavior:
You are being very
disrespectful. Correct
your behavior now
and stop interrupting
me.
(Approach: shaming, punitive, deterring)
To acknowledging
positive behavior:
You are listening very
attentively. Thanks for
actively engaging in
the lesson.
(Approach: acknowledging, positive, reinforcing)

Establishing Behavioral Expectations
The establishment of classroom norms and behavioral expectations
should:
• Promote inclusive and reflective processes through culturally
responsive decision-making that respects the cultural values of the
surrounding community and diverse students’ funds of knowledge
• Establish high standards for all students that serve a legitimate
purpose within the school setting (i.e. school safety) without
devaluing family norms and values in different cultures and home
settings
(González, Moll, & Amanti, 2005; Green, et al., 2015; Gregory, Skiba, & Mediratta, 2017; Leverson, Smith, McIntosh, Rose, & Pinkelman, 2019)

Behavioral Expectations Activity
Look at your list of behavioral expectations and examples. Label each expectation
as either positive (P) or negative (N) and each example as either specific (S) or
general (G).
• Are there more behavioral expectations on your list that are framed negatively
than positively? Why?
• Are the examples on your list more general or specific to a variety of common
school settings (i.e. classroom, hallway, bathroom, cafeteria, etc.)
• Are the behavioral expectations known by students, families and staff? Are
they modeled consistently by all staff? If not, why and under what conditions
would they be modeled?
• Are the behavioral expectations primarily representative of dominant white
cultural values? Do they serve a legitimate purpose within the school settings?
• Are there any behavioral expectations or specific examples that have not been
explicitly identified and taught?

Behavioral Expectations: School
Environments
Behavioral expectations must be taught:
• Embedded in existing curriculum
• Delivered through ongoing explicit instruction
• Re-taught through instructional interventions
• Inclusive of the English language levels of all learners
to ensure equitable and shared understandings
Behavioral expectations should be visible:
• Student handbooks and communication with families
• Posters and visual displays throughout the building

Teaching Behavioral Expectations
Students need to be taught context-specific behavioral expectations
within school settings.
All school staff need to model and actively teach behavioral
expectations to:
• Build fluency among students, parents, and staff
• Evaluate student’s understanding
• Give students opportunities to demonstrate skills
• Reinforce staff and student agreement about expectations

Behavioral Expectations: Practical Example
“Keep It Clean” by A&M Consolidated High School.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SILZ82YEpcM

Content Break
• Drink
• Think
• Digest
• Discuss
• Journal
• Kinesthetic activity

Behavioral Violation
WAC 392-400-025(1) “Behavioral violation" means a student's behavior that violates
a school district's discipline policy adopted under WAC 392-400-110.
In accordance with WAC 392-400-100, district policies and procedures must:
(a) Clearly state the types of behaviors for which discipline, including suspension
and expulsion, may be administered;
(b) Have a real and substantial relationship to the lawful maintenance and
operation of the school district including, but not limited to, the preservation of the
health and safety of students and employees and the preservation of an educational
process that is conducive to learning;

Defining Behavioral Violations
Behaviors that constitute a behavioral violation should be
operationally defined:
• Specific: clearly defined in detail
• Observable: action that can be seen
• Measurable: action that can be counted or timed
(Borgmeier, C., 2018; Green, et al., 2015)

Categorizing Behavioral Violations
Behavioral violations should be organized into minor and major
categories or levels of severity with distinct procedures for
responding to each:
Minor
• Handled at the classroom level
• May not result in classroom exclusion or suspension
Major
• Referred to a school administrator
• May result in an administrative decision to suspend or expel
(Green, et al., 2015)

Behavioral Expectations and Violations
Not meeting
behavioral
expectations
Behavioral
violation

Behavioral Violations and Implicit Bias
Implicit bias can play a role in interpreting student behaviors:
• Subjectively defined behavioral violations
• Assumptions about students’ family environment or norms
• Labeling (media stereotypes, tracking, program eligibility, etc.)
• Educator over-attention (expect certain misbehavior)
• Educator under-attention (minimalize certain misbehavior)
• Cultural mismatch
• Low expectations
• Developmentally unrealistic expectations
(Bal, Schrader, Afacan, & Mawene, 2016; Bradshaw, Mitchell, O’Brennan, & Leaf, 2010; Gilliam, et al., 2016; Hatt, 2012; Morris & Perry, 2017;
Smolkowski, Girvan, McIntosh, Nese, & Horner, 2016)

Classroom Practices: Protective Factors
• Increased positive adult interactions
• High academic expectations
• Engaging instruction
• Self-regulation techniques to mitigate impact of educator biases
• Opportunities to respond
• Behavioral expectations explicitly taught and modeled
• Culturally responsive teaching
• Commitment to racial equity
• Continuum of developmentally and age-appropriate responses
• Trauma-informed strategies that foster resiliency
• Classroom routines and environmental arrangements
(Cook, et al., 2018; Green, et al., 2015; Larson, Pas, Bradshaw, Rosenberg, & Day-Vines, 2018)

Adult Interpretations of Student Behavior
“School suspensions are an adult behavior” Rosemarie Allen TEDxTalks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8nkcRMZKV4&feature=youtu.be

Equitable Systems & Data-
Based Decision-Making

Identifying Inequities in School Discipline
Setting Event
Poor instruction
and few positive
adult interactions
Antecedent
Directives and
perceptions of
neglect, injustice,
or illegitimacy
Behavior
Resistance,
deviance,
attention-seeking,
or disengagement
Consequence
Involuntary
compliance and
exclusionary
discipline
(Curran, 2016; McIntosh, Girvan, Horner, & Smolkowski, 2014; McIntosh & Payno, 2018; Perry & Morris, 2014; Way, 2011)

Increasing Equity in School Discipline
Setting Event
Engaging
instruction and
frequent positive
adult interactions
Antecedent
Opportunities to
respond and
perception of
fairness
Behavior
Pro-social skills
and human error
Consequence
Positive feedback
and instructional
discipline
(Curran, 2016; McIntosh, Girvan, Horner, & Smolkowski, 2014; McIntosh & Payno, 2018; Perry & Morris, 2014; Way, 2011)

Data Collection Tools and Strategies
Data Collection Tools
• Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence (ABC) forms
• Incident Reports
• Office Discipline Referral (ODR)
• Time Out of Class form or Missed Instruction log
Data Collection Strategies
• Consistent entry of school enrollment and discipline data by student
race/ethnicity, gender, etc.
• Standardized definitions and data collection methods
• Format to use data for principal and parent notice

Data Analysis Strategies
• Patterns of disproportionality to identify differential selection that is occurring
early in the discipline continuum (behavior types, times/days/months, location,
setting events, triggers, possible motivations, referring staff)
• Disaggregated by student subgroups (demographics and characteristics)
• Disaggregated by behavior types (severity level and categories)
• Cross-tabulated at the student level (demographics and characteristics) and
school level (e.g. behavior type and location)
• Integrated analysis to identify correlations between student academic and
behavioral outcomes

Vulnerable Decision Points
Contextual variables that increase the likelihood of implicit bias
influencing discipline decision-making:
• Subjective behavior (ambiguously defined, adult-rated level of severity,
etc.)
• School setting (classrooms, academic tasks, etc.)
• Time of day (stress, hunger, fatigue, etc.)
• Unfamiliar with student (in-group bias, etc.)
(McIntosh, Girvan, Horner, & Smolkowski, 2014; McIntosh & Payno, 2018; Smolkowski, Girvan, McIntosh, Nese, & Horner, 2016)

Vulnerable Decision Points
Promising strategies for neutralizing implicit bias:
• Delay decision (interrupt potential escalation and model calm
behavior)
• Reframe the situation (assume student is communicating a need, etc.)
• Self-awareness (recognition of internal state and personal biases)
• Self-regulate (internal check, breathing techniques, etc.)
(McIntosh, Girvan, Horner, & Smolkowski, 2014; McIntosh & Payno, 2018; Smolkowski, Girvan, McIntosh, Nese, & Horner, 2016)

Exclusionary Adult Behaviors
Exclusionary practices are adult behaviors that:
• May provide temporary relief
• Do not support students in meeting behavioral expectations
• May incentivize repeated use of exclusionary practices
Educators that overly rely on exclusionary practices:
• Are capable of learning replacement behaviors
• Should receive support through professional learning opportunities,
additional classroom or school personnel, coaching, etc.
(Cook, et al., 2018; Gregory, 2016; Larson, Pas, Bradshaw, Rosenberg, & Day-Vines, 2018; Okonofua, Paunesku, & Walton, 2016)

Vulnerable Decision Points & Classroom
Exclusion Analysis
WHAT problem behaviors are associated with disproportionate classroom
exclusions?
WHERE are there disproportionate classroom exclusions (i.e., for what
locations)?
WHEN are there disproportionate classroom exclusions (i.e., for what times of
day/days of the week/months of the school year)?
WHAT MOTIVATIONS are associated with disproportionate classroom
exclusions (e.g., for what perceived functions of problem behavior)?
WHO is issuing disproportionate classroom exclusions (e.g., for what staff)?
(Adapted from McIntosh, Barnes, Eliason, & Morris, 2014 p. 16)

Equitable Learning Environments Example
“Why We Need Trauma-Sensitive Schools” by Trauma Sensitive Schools
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyQdOLl6d2c

Other Forms of Discipline
and Classroom Exclusion

Classroom Exclusion: Definition
WAC 392-400-025 defines classroom exclusion as “the exclusion of a
student from a classroom or instructional or activity area for behavioral
violations” and provides that “[c]lassroom exclusion does not include
actions that result in missed instruction for a brief duration when:
(a) a teacher or other school personnel attempts other forms of
discipline to support the student in meeting behavioral expectations,
and
(b) the student remains under the supervision of the teacher or other
school personnel during such brief duration.

Other Forms of Discipline Definition
"Other forms of discipline" refers to actions used in response to
behavioral violations, which may involve the use of best
practices and strategies included in the state menu for behavior.
See WAC 392-400-025(9)
• Identify other forms of discipline. See WAC 392-400-110(1)(e)
• Attempt other forms of discipline. See WAC 392-400-330(2)

• Teach, model, and reinforce behavioral expectations
• Parent communication
• Active supervision
• Correct misbehaviors in private
• Increase opportunities to respond
• Restorative practices
• Environmental adjustments
• Collaborative problem-solving
• Function-based thinking/assessment
Classroom Best Practices and Strategies

Classroom Exclusion: Teacher Authority &
RCW 28A.600.020(2)
Teachers and principals must develop shared understandings,
establish agreed upon protocols, and receive ongoing professional
learning related to:
• District and building definitions of behavioral violations considered
disruptive enough to the educational process that a classroom
exclusion would be allowable
• District and building policies and procedures for first attempting one
or more other forms of discipline
• District and building procedures for the principal and teacher to
confer following a classroom exclusion

Classroom Exclusion Procedures
Behavioral
Violation
Other Forms of
Discipline
Classroom
Exclusion
Principal
Notice
Parent
Notice
Grievance
Procedure
Procedures
Conditions and Limitations
Teacher Principal or Designee
District and Building Policy
Process for principal and teacher
to confer regarding the classroom
exclusion and returning the
student to class
RCW 28A.600.020(2)
Process for principal and teachers to
confer regarding building disciplinary
standards (e.g. classroom-managed /
office-managed)
RCW 28A.400.110; RCW 28A.600.020(3)

Classroom Exclusion Considerations
• Emergency circumstances
• Exclusion duration
• Removal from school
• Brief duration of missed instruction
• Educational services
• Non-curricular activities
Student Discipline Rules Q&A: A Technical Guide

Recess Exclusions
Washington laws do not prohibit school districts from excluding students from recess
in response to behavioral violations but research demonstrates that limiting physical
activities can increase problem behaviors.
• The Washington State School Directors’Association (WSSDA) model policy explicitly
provides that “[p]hysical activity during the school day (including but not limited to
recess, brain boosters/energizers, or physical education) will not be used or withheld
as punishment for any reason.” See WSSDA 6700P Procedure – Nutrition, Health, and
Physical Fitness. www.wssda.org
• The SHAPE America Position Statement on Using Physical Activity as Punishment
and/or Behavior Management considers withholding recess time as a consequence
for behavioral violations to be an inappropriate and unsound educational practice.
www.shapeamerica.org

Reasons to Contest Discipline Decisions
1) Disagree that student committed behavioral violation and with
discipline action
2) Agree student committed behavioral violation but disagree with
discipline action
• Concerned that discipline action was too severe
• Concerned about impact on educational progress

Options to Contest Discipline Decisions
Informal conversation
Courts
Grievance procedure
Appeal process for short-term
and in-school suspension
Appeal process for emergency
expulsion, long-term suspension,
and expulsion
Mediation

Grievance Procedures Considerations
School districts must establish grievance procedures to address parent
or student grievances related to classroom exclusions and other forms
of discipline
• At a minimum, provide the student an opportunity to share their
perspective and explanation regarding the behavioral violation
• Opportunities for grievance procedures at the building, district, and
school board levels
• Parent and student notification regarding the student and parent’s
right to address grievances through the district’s procedures

True or False? A classroom exclusion includes any instance
where a teacher might send a student from the classroom to
another location in the school.
False
• Classroom exclusion must be in response to a behavioral violation.
• Sending a student to another classroom, the nurse, the counselor’s office, etc.
for reasons unrelated to a behavioral violation is not a classroom exclusion.
• Taking actions in response to a behavioral violation—such as issuing an office
discipline referral (ODR) to send a student to the dean’s office—would
constitute a classroom exclusion.
• Asking a student to step out into the hallway to have a brief conversation for
the purpose of re-teaching or reviewing classroom expectations would not
constitute a classroom exclusion

True
• The student’s parent(s) must be informed as soon as reasonably possible.
• The person responsible for making parent contact can be the teacher,
principal, or other school personnel.
• School districts must ensure language access when communicating to
parents with limited-English proficiency.
• The timeliness and medium of communication (e.g. phone, email, in-
person, etc.) may depend on parent preference.
True or False? The student’s parent(s) must be informed
about a classroom exclusion.

False
• It is not the absence or presence of educational or behavioral services (or the
quality of such services) that define an action as exclusionary or not—it is the
act of excluding a student from a particular “classroom or instructional or
activity area” in response to an alleged behavioral violation. See RCW
28A.600.015(8); RCW 28A.600.020(2).
• RCW 28A.600.015(8) provides that “[s]chool districts may not suspend the
provision of educational services to a student as a disciplinary action.”
• If a teacher excludes a student from their classroom in response to a
behavioral violation that disrupts the educational process that action would
constitute a classroom exclusion—regardless of what location the student is
excluded to and what services the student is receiving in that location.
True or False? If a student is sent to the office, library, or
other location in the school for a behavioral violation but
the student is provided coursework from their regular
class to complete, then it is not exclusionary.

True or False? Unless it’s an emergency situation, a teacher
must always attempt one or more other forms of discipline
prior to administering a classroom exclusion.
True
• In the majority of circumstances a teacher is required to first attempt one or more
other forms of discipline before resorting to classroom exclusion
• However, in emergency circumstances a teacher may immediately exclude a student.
• Emergency circumstances are limited to rare instances when the student’s
presence poses an immediate and continuing danger to other students or school
personnel, or an immediate and continuing threat of material and substantial
disruption of the educational process.
• In emergency circumstances, the teacher must immediately notify the principal or
designee, and the principal or designee must meet with the student as soon as
reasonably possible to administer appropriate discipline.

Family Engagement and District Procedures
RCW 28A.600.020(3) educators “make every reasonable attempt to involve the parent or guardian
and the student in the resolution of student discipline”
District procedures “shall be developed with the participation of parents and the community”
“must provide for early involvement of parents in attempts to improve the student's behavior.”
RCW 28A.320.211(3) School districts, in consultation with school district staff, students, families, and
the community, shall periodically review and update their discipline rules, policies, and procedures.

Discipline Procedures Review Strategies
Build trust with the families and the community
• Establish cultural awareness of the entire community
• Gain an understanding of histories between groups
• Listen and respond respectfully
Create spaces for engagement and collaboration
• Provide opportunities for diverse participation
• Consider transportation and language accessibility
• Promote open and honest discussion
Include school personnel
• Encourage participation from diverse viewpoints
Provide clear messaging and goals
• Provide agendas in advance and set timelines for follow-up
• Ensure consistent communication across all groups (Davis, 2017)

Research-Based Framework:
Equity in School Discipline
(Gregory, Skiba, & Mediratta, 2017, p. 255.)

Implementation Stages
Exploration Installation Initial Full
“It is clear that implementation is not an event, but a process, involving
multiple decisions, actions, and corrections to change the structures and
conditions through which organizations and systems support and promote
new program models, innovations, and initiatives.”— Metz & Bartley, 2012

Implementation Iterative Processes
Image from sisep.fpg.unc.edu CC BY-NC-ND

References
Anyon, Y., Jenson, J. M., Altschul, I., Farrar, J., McQueen, J., Greer, E., Downing, B., & Simmons, J. (2014). The persistent effect of race
and the promise of alternatives to suspension in school discipline outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 379–386.
Bal, A., Schrader, E. M., Afacan, K., & Mawene, D. (2016). Using learning labs for culturally responsive positive behavioral
interventions and supports. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52, 122–128.
Borgmeier, C. (2018). Understanding and supporting Students with Challenging Behavior: Building Capacity in Teachers and Schools
[PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://www.oregonrti.org/copy-of-resources-handouts-annual-conference-april-2018
Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., O'brennan, L. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Multilevel exploration of factors contributing to the
overrepresentation of black students in office disciplinary referrals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 508.
Cook, C. R., Duong, M. T., McIntosh, K., Fiat, A. E., Larson, M., Pullmann, M. D., & McGinnis, J. (2018). Addressing discipline
disparities for Black male students: Linking malleable root causes to feasible and effective practices. School Psychology Review, 47,
135-152.
Curran, F. C. (2016). Estimating the effect of state zero tolerance laws on exclusionary discipline, racial discipline gaps, and student
behavior. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 647–668.
Davis, C. R. (2017). " Why Are the Black Kids Being Suspended?" An Examination of a School District's Efforts to Reform a Faulty
Suspension Policy Through Community Conversations. School Community Journal, 27, 159.
Gilliam, W. S., Maupin, A. N., Reyes, C. R., Accavitti, M., & Shic, F. (2016). Do early educators’ implicit biases regarding sex and race
relate to behavior expectations and recommendations of preschool expulsions and suspensions?. Yale Child Study Center,
September, 991–1013.
González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms.
Routledge.

References
Green, A. L., Nese, R. N. T., McIntosh, K., Nishioka, V., Eliason, B., & Canizal Delabra, A. (2015). Key elements of policies to address
disproportionality within SWPBIS: A guide for district and school teams. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral
Interventions and Supports.
Gregory, A., Hafen, C. A., Ruzek, E., Mikami, A. Y., Allen, J. P., & Pianta, R. C. (2016). Closing the racial discipline gap in classrooms by
changing teacher practice. School Psychology Review, 45, 171–191.
Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Mediratta, K. (2017). Eliminating Disparities in School Discipline: A Framework for Intervention. Review of
Research in Education, 41, 253–278.
Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Noguera, P. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin?. Educational
Researcher, 39, 59–68.
Hatt, B. (2012). Smartness as a cultural practice in schools. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 438-460.
Larson, K. E., Pas, E. T., Bradshaw, C. P., Rosenberg, M. S., & Day-Vines, N. L. (2018). Examining how proactive management and
culturally responsive teaching relate to student behavior: Implications for measurement and practice. School Psychology Review,
47, 153-166.
Leverson, M., Smith, K., McIntosh, K., Rose, J., & Pinkelman, S. (2019). PBIS Cultural Responsiveness Field Guide: Resources for trainers and
coaches. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
McIntosh, K., Barnes, A., Eliason, B., & Morris, K. (2014). Using discipline data within SWPBIS to identify and address disproportionality: A
guide for school teams. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
McIntosh, K., Girvan, E. J., Horner, R., & Smolkowski, K. (2014). Education not incarceration: A conceptual model for reducing racial
and ethnic disproportionality in school discipline. Journal of Applied Research on Children, 5, 1–22.

References
McIntosh, K., & Payno, R., (2018). Neutralizing Implicit Bias in School Discipline [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from
https://www.pbis.org/presentations/chicago-forum-18
Metz, A., & Bartley, L. (2012). Active implementation frameworks for program success: How to use implementation science to
improve outcomes for children. Zero to Three, 32, 11-18.
Morris, E. W., & Perry, B. L. (2017). Girls behaving badly? Race, gender, and subjective evaluation in the discipline of African
American girls. Sociology of Education, 90, 127-148.
Okonofua, J., Paunesku, D., & Walton, G. (2016). Brief intervention to encourage empathic discipline cuts suspension rates in half
among adolescents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201523698.
Perry, B. L., & Morris, E. W. (2014). Suspending progress: Collateral consequences of exclusionary punishment in public schools.
American Sociological Review, 79, 1067–1087.
Smolkowski, K., Girvan, E. J., McIntosh, K., Nese, R. N., & Horner, R. H. (2016). Vulnerable decision points for disproportionate
office discipline referrals: Comparisons of discipline for African American and White elementary school students. Behavioral
Disorders, 41, 178-195.
Way, S. (2011). School discipline and disruptive classroom behavior: The moderating effects of student perceptions. The Sociological
Quarterly, 52, 346–375.

Except where otherwise noted, this work by Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owners.
This presentation may contain or reference links to websites operated by third parties. These links are provided for your
convenience only and do not constitute or imply any affiliation, endorsement, sponsorship, approval, verification, or
monitoring by OSPI of any product, service, or content offered on the third party websites. In no event will OSPI be
responsible for the information or content in linked third party websites or for your use of or inability to use such websites.
Please confirm the license status of any third-party resources and understand their terms of use before reusing them.
The information contained in this presentation and power point is an overview of student discipline requirements. The
presentation is not intended as legal advice. The state regulations that implement student discipline statutes under Chapter
28A.600 RCW are located under Chapter 392-400 WAC. Outside resources are not intended to be an endorsement of any
service or product. District personnel should always review their district’s procedures and review questions with their
administrative staff.

Webinar Q&A Protocols
• Please submit questions in writing through the question log
• Please keep questions related to the webinar content
• OSPI staff and guests will not be able to answer questions about
specific scenarios, students, or experiences
• OSPI staff is readily available to provide technical assistance
following the webinar

Questions?
Joshua Lynch, Program Supervisor, Student Discipline,
Behavior & Readiness to Learn
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction
email: joshua.lynch@k12.wa.us

discipline-training-classroom-procedures.pptx

More Related Content

Similar to discipline-training-classroom-procedures.pptx (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

discipline-training-classroom-procedures.pptx

Editor's Notes